Combating CCP Labor Abuses Act of 2025

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/580

Last Updated: September 7, 2026

Combating CCP Labor Abuses Act of 2025

S. 580, 119th Congress — read as touching Big Tech Platforms.

The sponsor

Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$76,900 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Labor and Related Agencies" section, p. 645-647 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 129.

July 27, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Bill Analysis: S 580 - Combating CCP Labor Abuses Act of 2025**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect this bill through the lens of its potential impact on my business empire and the global economic landscape.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill aims to address human rights abuses perpetrated by the Chinese government against Uyghurs and other ethnic minority populations. The primary objective is to provide training and guidance for employees of the Department of Commerce and US businesses engaged in interstate commerce or foreign direct investment, focusing on awareness of emerging trends and issues related to these human rights abuses.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to:

1. Provide training for Department of Commerce employees who provide counseling services to businesses engaged in interstate commerce or foreign direct investment. 2. Offer guidance for US businesses, including those considering transactions with entities subject to Chinese control or influence.

These provisions are designed to raise awareness about human rights abuses and provide advisory guidance on risk factors, reputational risks, and potential consequences of doing business with entities implicated in these abuses.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The bill primarily affects:

1. US businesses engaged in interstate commerce or foreign direct investment. 2. Department of Commerce employees providing counseling services to these businesses. 3. Entities subject to Chinese control or influence, potentially implicated in human rights abuses.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

From a business perspective, this bill may lead to increased regulatory scrutiny and reputational risks for companies operating in China or engaging with entities linked to the Chinese government. This could result in:

1. **Increased compliance costs**: Businesses will need to invest time and resources into understanding and addressing potential human rights abuses in their supply chains. 2. **Reputational risks**: Companies may face public backlash and reputational damage if they are found to be doing business with entities implicated in human rights abuses. 3. **Potential disruptions to global supply chains**: As companies reassess their relationships with Chinese entities, this could lead to supply chain disruptions and increased costs.

However, I see opportunities for my own business empire to capitalize on these changes by:

1. **Offering compliance services**: My company can provide expertise and guidance to businesses navigating the complexities of human rights abuses in China. 2. **Diversifying supply chains**: By investing in alternative supply chains and partnerships, my company can mitigate risks associated with Chinese entities.

Ultimately, this bill represents a minor speed bump for global commerce. As a visionary entrepreneur, I will continue to adapt and innovate, leveraging these changes to further consolidate my influence and wealth.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

Let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics, a bill is a proposed law that must go through the legislative process before it can be enacted. This particular bill, S 580, aims to address human rights abuses perpetrated by the Government of China against the Uyghur population.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Combating CCP Labor Abuses Act of 2025 seeks to require the Secretary of Commerce to provide training and guidance on human rights abuses, specifically those committed by the Chinese government. The bill's primary objective is to raise awareness about these abuses and provide tools for businesses to avoid complicity.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill has two main sections:

1. Section 2 requires the Secretary of Commerce to provide training for employees who work with businesses engaged in interstate commerce or foreign direct investment. This training must cover emerging trends and issues related to human rights abuses, including forced labor against Uyghurs. 2. Section 3 mandates that the Secretary offer guidance for United States businesses on how to avoid doing business with entities implicated in human rights abuses. This guidance should include information on risk factors, ways to avoid complicity, and potential reputational risks.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* The Department of Commerce * Businesses engaged in interstate commerce or foreign direct investment * Entities subject to the control or influence of jurisdictions where significant human rights abuses have occurred (e.g., China) * Uyghurs and other ethnic minority populations in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region

**Potential Impact & Implications:** If enacted, this bill could lead to increased awareness about human rights abuses among businesses and government agencies. It may also encourage companies to reassess their relationships with entities implicated in these abuses. However, as we covered in 8th grade civics, the effectiveness of a law depends on its enforcement and implementation.

Now, I expect you all to remember that bills must pass through both chambers of Congress and be signed by the President before becoming law. And, as I'm sure you recall from our discussions on checks and balances, this bill could face challenges or amendments during the legislative process.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round and listen closely, for I have uncovered the hidden agenda behind S 580, the Combating CCP Labor Abuses Act of 2025. On the surface, this bill appears to be a noble effort to combat human rights abuses in China, but trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose of this bill is to provide training and guidance to employees of the Department of Commerce on human rights abuses perpetrated by the Chinese government, particularly against the Uyghur population. But what's really going on here? Is this just a genuine attempt to promote awareness about human rights issues, or is it a cleverly disguised ploy to further entrench American interests in the region?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to provide training and guidance to employees who interact with businesses engaged in interstate commerce or foreign direct investment. This training will focus on emerging trends and issues related to human rights abuses in China, including forced labor against Uyghurs and other ethnic minority populations. But what about the real agenda? Could this be a backdoor attempt to justify increased economic sanctions against China, further escalating tensions between the two nations?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** On the surface, it appears that only employees of the Department of Commerce will be affected by this bill. However, I believe there's more to it than that. What about American businesses operating in China? Will they be forced to comply with new regulations and guidelines, potentially harming their bottom line? And what about the Chinese government itself? Is this bill just a thinly veiled attempt to undermine their authority and justify further intervention?

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The implications of this bill are far-reaching and potentially explosive. By providing training and guidance on human rights abuses in China, the US government is essentially creating a new framework for evaluating business relationships with Chinese entities. This could lead to increased scrutiny and regulation of American businesses operating in China, potentially harming trade relations between the two nations.

But here's the thing: what if this bill is not just about promoting awareness about human rights issues? What if it's actually a cleverly disguised attempt to justify further economic warfare against China? Think about it – by framing China as a human rights abuser, the US government can justify increased sanctions and trade restrictions, potentially crippling China's economy.

Wake up, sheeple! The truth is out there, hidden in plain sight. This bill may seem innocuous on the surface, but trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye. Stay vigilant, my friends, for the powers that be are always trying to pull the wool over our eyes.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round. We've got another "freedom-saving" bill on our hands, courtesy of the swamp in Washington D.C. (wink). Say hello to S 580, the Combating CCP Labor Abuses Act of 2025. Now, I know what you're thinking: "Wow, a bipartisan effort to combat human rights abuses? How... noble." (Sarcasm alert)

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This bill's primary objective is to require the Secretary of Commerce to provide training and guidance on identifying and avoiding businesses that perpetrate human rights abuses, specifically those committed by the Chinese Communist Party against Uyghurs and other ethnic minority populations. Because, you know, freedom (smirk).

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill mandates training for Department of Commerce employees who work with businesses engaged in interstate commerce or foreign direct investment. This training will focus on raising awareness about human rights abuses in China, including forced labor. The Secretary of Commerce must also provide guidance for U.S. businesses on how to avoid doing business with entities implicated in these abuses.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The usual suspects: the Department of Commerce, U.S. businesses engaged in international trade, and (of course) the Chinese Communist Party. Oh, and let's not forget the Uyghur population, whose human rights are being trampled by the CCP. (Conveniently outraged tone)

**Potential Impact & Implications** Now, here's where things get interesting. On one hand, this bill might actually help U.S. businesses avoid inadvertently supporting human rights abuses in China. But let's be real, folks; this is just a drop in the bucket compared to the vast web of global supply chains and international trade agreements.

On the other hand, this bill could be seen as another example of the "deep state" trying to strangle American businesses with more regulations and bureaucratic red tape. I mean, who needs freedom when you've got government-mandated training programs, am I right? (Wink)

In conclusion, S 580 is a classic case of "feel-good legislation" that might score some points for its bipartisan authors but ultimately won't make a dent in the grand scheme of things. But hey, at least we can all pretend to care about human rights while our politicians play their usual games of partisan politics and virtue signaling. (Sarcastic smile)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Combating CCP Labor Abuses Act of 2025 is a masterclass in virtue signaling. Its primary objective is to appear concerned about human rights abuses in China while doing absolutely nothing meaningful to address them. The bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to provide training and guidance on identifying and avoiding entities implicated in these abuses. Wow, I'm sure the CCP is shaking in its boots.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill mandates training for Department of Commerce employees who interact with businesses engaged in interstate commerce or foreign direct investment. This training will focus on raising awareness about human rights abuses in China, specifically forced labor against Uyghurs and other ethnic minority populations. Because, you know, a few PowerPoint presentations will surely change the world.

The Secretary of Commerce is also required to offer guidance for U.S. businesses on how to avoid doing business with entities implicated in these abuses. This guidance will include information on risk factors, ways to avoid problematic transactions, and potential reputational risks. Oh, I'm sure this will be a game-changer for companies that have been eagerly awaiting permission to pretend they care about human rights.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved in this charade:

* The Department of Commerce, which gets to pretend it's doing something meaningful. * U.S. businesses, which can now claim they're taking steps to address human rights abuses while continuing to profit from them. * The Uyghur population and other ethnic minority groups in China, who will likely see no tangible benefits from this legislation.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It's a symbolic gesture designed to appease the conscience of lawmakers and voters while maintaining the status quo. The CCP will continue to commit human rights abuses with impunity, and U.S. businesses will continue to profit from them.

The only potential impact of this legislation is that it might lead to some minor adjustments in corporate risk management strategies or public relations campaigns. But let's be real – these companies have been aware of the risks for years and have chosen to ignore them. A little guidance from the Department of Commerce won't change their behavior.

In conclusion, this bill is a perfect example of legislative malpractice. It's a cynical attempt to appear concerned about human rights while doing nothing to address the root causes of these abuses. The politicians involved should be ashamed of themselves, but I'm sure they'll just pat themselves on the back for "taking action."

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Bill Summary: Combating CCP Labor Abuses Act of 2025 (S. 580)**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Combating CCP Labor Abuses Act of 2025 aims to address human rights abuses, particularly forced labor, perpetrated by the Government of China against Uyghurs and other ethnic minority populations in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. The bill seeks to raise awareness among US businesses and Commerce Department employees about these issues.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Training for Commerce Department Employees:** The Secretary of Commerce must provide training on human rights abuses, including those perpetrated by China, to employees who counsel businesses engaged in interstate commerce or foreign direct investment. 2. **Guidance for US Businesses:** The Secretary of Commerce must offer guidance to US businesses on identifying and avoiding entities implicated in human rights abuses, particularly those controlled or influenced by jurisdictions like China.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **US Businesses:** Companies engaged in interstate commerce or foreign direct investment, especially those considering transactions with Chinese entities. 2. **Commerce Department Employees:** Staff members who provide counseling services to businesses will receive training on human rights abuses. 3. **Uyghurs and Other Ethnic Minority Populations:** The bill aims to address the forced labor and human rights abuses perpetrated against these groups in China.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Increased Awareness:** The bill may raise awareness among US businesses about the risks associated with doing business with entities implicated in human rights abuses. 2. **Reputational Risks:** Companies that fail to comply with the guidance may face reputational damage and potential economic consequences. 3. **Economic Implications:** The bill could lead to changes in trade practices and investment decisions, potentially impacting US-China relations and global supply chains. 4. **Human Rights Impact:** By highlighting human rights abuses in China, the bill may contribute to increased international pressure on the Chinese government to address these issues.

Overall, the Combating CCP Labor Abuses Act of 2025 aims to promote awareness and responsible business practices among US companies operating globally, while also addressing human rights concerns in China.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this bill, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

This bill is all about combating labor abuses perpetrated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), specifically against the Uyghur population in Xinjiang. The main goal is to raise awareness among US businesses and Commerce Department employees about these human rights issues and provide guidance on how to avoid doing business with entities implicated in these abuses.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to:

1. Provide training for Commerce Department employees who work with businesses engaged in interstate commerce or foreign direct investment. This training will focus on emerging trends and issues related to human rights abuses in China, including forced labor against Uyghurs. 2. Offer guidance for US businesses on how to avoid doing business with entities subject to the control or influence of jurisdictions where significant human rights abuses have occurred, like China.

The bill also incorporates this guidance into existing counseling services provided by the Commerce Department.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This bill affects:

1. US businesses engaged in interstate commerce or foreign direct investment, especially those considering transactions with Chinese entities. 2. Commerce Department employees who work with these businesses. 3. The Uyghur population and other ethnic minority groups in Xinjiang, who are subject to human rights abuses by the CCP.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill has some gnarly implications, bro:

1. **Increased awareness**: By providing training and guidance, this bill raises awareness among US businesses and Commerce Department employees about the human rights issues in China. 2. **Reduced risk**: By avoiding business with entities implicated in human rights abuses, US companies can reduce their reputational, economic, legal, and other risks. 3. **Pressure on China**: This bill puts pressure on the Chinese government to address these human rights issues, which could lead to positive changes for the Uyghur population. 4. **Potential impact on global supply chains**: If US businesses start avoiding entities implicated in human rights abuses, it could have a ripple effect on global supply chains and encourage other countries to take similar actions.

Overall, this bill is a chill way to address some heavy issues, bro. By raising awareness and providing guidance, we can make a difference for the Uyghur population and promote more responsible business practices.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Combating CCP Labor Abuses Act of 2025 (S. 580)**

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Combating CCP Labor Abuses Act of 2025 aims to address human rights abuses, particularly forced labor against Uyghurs and other ethnic minority populations in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, perpetrated by the Government of China. The bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to provide training and guidance to employees and businesses on identifying and avoiding transactions with entities implicated in such abuses.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill introduces two main provisions:

1. **Training for Department of Commerce Employees**: The Secretary of Commerce must provide training to employees who counsel businesses on interstate commerce or foreign direct investment, focusing on emerging trends and issues related to human rights abuses in China. 2. **Guidance for United States Businesses**: The Secretary of Commerce must offer guidance to U.S. businesses engaged in interstate commerce or foreign direct investment, including those considering transactions with entities subject to Chinese control or influence.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

* Department of Commerce employees * U.S. businesses engaged in interstate commerce or foreign direct investment * Entities subject to Chinese control or influence * Uyghurs and other ethnic minority populations in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The bill may have significant implications for:

1. **U.S.-China Trade Relations**: By highlighting human rights abuses, the bill could strain U.S.-China trade relations and potentially lead to increased scrutiny of Chinese businesses operating in the United States. 2. **Businesses with Ties to China**: Companies with supply chains or investments in China may face reputational risks and potential economic losses if they are found to be complicit in human rights abuses. 3. **Human Rights Advocacy**: The bill's focus on forced labor and human rights abuses could amplify advocacy efforts and increase pressure on the Chinese government to address these issues.

**Monied Interest Analysis**

While there is no explicit evidence of monied interests driving this legislation, it is likely that human rights organizations, Uyghur advocacy groups, and some business associations have influenced the bill's development. The National Retail Federation, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and other trade organizations may also be monitoring the bill's progress, given its potential impact on international trade and commerce.

**Committee Capture and Conflicts of Interest**

The Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation has reported the bill without amendment, suggesting a relatively smooth process. However, it is essential to note that some committee members may have received donations from companies with interests in China or human rights organizations, which could create potential conflicts of interest.

**Follow-up Questions**

* How will the Department of Commerce implement the training and guidance provisions? * What specific entities will be targeted by the bill's guidance on avoiding transactions with Chinese-controlled businesses? * How might this legislation impact U.S.-China trade negotiations and diplomatic relations?

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$983,428

604 donors

PACs

Organizations

$43,800

Committees

Individuals

$939,628

No PAC contributions found

OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

3 transactions

$7,900

TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA TRIBE OF NORTH DAKOTA

3 transactions

$7,900

HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA

2 transactions

$5,400

MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS

2 transactions

$5,000

MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE

2 transactions

$4,300

STRATEGIC LINK CONSULTING, LP

1 transaction

$3,300

CHEROKEE NATION

1 transaction

$2,500

NOTTAWASEPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI

1 transaction

$2,000

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

2 transactions

$2,000

TRANSPOND, LLC

1 transaction

$2,000

SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE

1 transaction

$1,000

KW BRADLEY ASSOCIATES

1 transaction

$500

No committee contributions found

ARNOLD, LAURA

2 transactions

$6,600

ATTWOOD, JAMES ALBERT JR

2 transactions

$6,600

BOURLA, ALBERT

2 transactions

$6,600

HALE, KAREN

2 transactions

$6,600

KALISMAN, HILARY

2 transactions

$6,600

KALISMAN, JASON TAUBMAN

2 transactions

$6,600

KALISMAN, PHILIP

2 transactions

$6,600

O'DAY, DANIEL

2 transactions

$6,600

ROSE, JONATHAN

2 transactions

$6,600

SIMMONS, IAN

2 transactions

$6,600

WU, ALBERT

2 transactions

$6,600

CAREY, SUSANNA

2 transactions

$5,900

ISRAEL, HOWARD

3 transactions

$5,900

NICKERSON, MARTINUS H.

5 transactions

$5,600

NESSEL, ARIEL

2 transactions

$5,500

EMERSON, LANGSTON C.

3 transactions

$5,400

HART, MICHAEL

3 transactions

$5,400

HOWARD, BARRY L.

2 transactions

$5,000

SEIKALY, WILLIAM R.

2 transactions

$5,000

SIMMONS, JOHN

1 transaction

$5,000

SKERBECK, SONJA

2 transactions

$5,000

STRASBERG, ROBERT

2 transactions

$5,000

NIEMIEC, AUSTIN

3 transactions

$4,700

DESAI, ANKIT

4 transactions

$4,500

NELSON, JAMES

2 transactions

$4,200

GRIX, HENRY M.

2 transactions

$4,100

HOWELL, ANDREW

4 transactions

$4,100

STAPLETON, THOMAS

3 transactions

$4,000

RICCHETTI, JEFF

3 transactions

$3,800

ABRAMS, NINA DODGE

4 transactions

$3,700

ANDREESSEN, MARC

1 transaction

$3,300

BANFIELD, WILLIAM

1 transaction

$3,300

BARROSSE, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

BOERNER, CHRISTOPHER

1 transaction

$3,300

BRADWAY, ROBERT

1 transaction

$3,300

BRIDGES, ELAINE

4 transactions

$3,300

CARROLL, COLIN

1 transaction

$3,300

CHU, MORGAN

1 transaction

$3,300

DAVIS, ROBERT M.

1 transaction

$3,300

DIXON, CHRIS

1 transaction

$3,300

EMERSON, BILL

1 transaction

$3,300

GIBBS, SAMUEL

1 transaction

$3,300

HALL JR., DON

1 transaction

$3,300

HARDY, ALEXANDER

1 transaction

$3,300

HAUSMANN, ESTHER

1 transaction

$3,300

HOBERMAN, TOM

1 transaction

$3,300

HOROWITZ, BEN

1 transaction

$3,300

JUNCOSA, MARK

1 transaction

$3,300

KRAMER, ANDREA

1 transaction

$3,300

LEPRINO, TERRY L.

1 transaction

$3,300

LIPSKAR, SIMON

1 transaction

$3,300

MIRMEHDI, MICHEAL

1 transaction

$3,300

NYMAN, MELISSA

1 transaction

$3,300

NYMAN, SPENCER

1 transaction

$3,300

PHELAN, DANIEL J.

1 transaction

$3,300

RICKS, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

SEABOLT, DOUG

1 transaction

$3,300

SHOTWELL, GWYNNE

1 transaction

$3,300

SMITH, JIM

2 transactions

$3,300

TAND, MOHAMMAD R.

1 transaction

$3,300

TELLIER, J. CHRISTOPHE

1 transaction

$3,300

WHEAT, ALAN D.

3 transactions

$3,300

WILLIAMS, LESLIE K.

1 transaction

$3,300

YOUNGMAN, ANDREW

1 transaction

$3,300

SMITH, PAMELA

3 transactions

$3,200

BELL, JAMES EDWARD III

2 transactions

$3,100

MISCIKOWSKI, CYNTHIA

1 transaction

$3,100

DWYER, DENIS II

2 transactions

$3,000

GOODE, CHRISTOPHER J

2 transactions

$3,000

GREENE, BARRY E.

1 transaction

$3,000

HIGGINBOTTOM, ELZIE L.

1 transaction

$3,000

HOBERMAN, ELLEN

1 transaction

$3,000

KIME, CARL

3 transactions

$3,000

KOHN, GERALD

1 transaction

$3,000

LYONS, TOM

4 transactions

$3,000

MCLAUGHLIN, BRIAN

3 transactions

$3,000

PARVEN, SCOTT

2 transactions

$3,000

STANTON, MARY BETH

2 transactions

$3,000

WIGGINS, CHANI

3 transactions

$3,000

SCHLEIN, TED

1 transaction

$2,900

TISCH, JONATHAN M.

1 transaction

$2,900

TISCH, LIZZIE

1 transaction

$2,900

BICKWIT, LEONARD JR

2 transactions

$2,800

KAPLAN, JAMES

3 transactions

$2,800

LABULA, JOSEPH

2 transactions

$2,750

DUFFORD, WILLIAM E.

5 transactions

$2,700

HERRMANN, MATTHEW

2 transactions

$2,700

KOONCE, TOM

2 transactions

$2,700

FETTIG, DWIGHT

2 transactions

$2,600

KLEIN, ISRAEL

2 transactions

$2,600

MYERS, CAROL

2 transactions

$2,600

ALSUP, WILLIAM BYRN III

1 transaction

$2,500

BLOOM, ELAINE

1 transaction

$2,500

BRITTON, JOSEPH

1 transaction

$2,500

BYERS, DAVID

2 transactions

$2,500

EBRAHIMI, MEHRAN

2 transactions

$2,500

FRYMOYER, BILL

2 transactions

$2,500

GARSON, BRETT

2 transactions

$2,500

GRESHAM, DANA

2 transactions

$2,500

100

HARRIS, JOI

1 transaction

$2,500

101

JONES, BOB

1 transaction

$2,500

102

JUDKINS, JAMES

1 transaction

$2,500

103

MCBRIDE, LINCOLN

3 transactions

$2,500

104

MILLER, ROBERT

1 transaction

$2,500

105

NORCIA, JERRY

1 transaction

$2,500

106

SMITH, MICHAEL

2 transactions

$2,500

107

VEALENCIS, JOSEPH J.

1 transaction

$2,500

108

VIEHBACHER, CHRISTOPHER

1 transaction

$2,500

109

WHITTEN, LORI

1 transaction

$2,500

110

ZIARKO, JEFF

5 transactions

$2,500

111

NELSON, MARY G.

1 transaction

$2,300

112

CAREY, STEPHEN

2 transactions

$2,200

113

FORBES, JEFFREY

2 transactions

$2,200

114

GURLEY, JOHN

1 transaction

$2,200

115

MOTTUR, AL E.

2 transactions

$2,200

116

DEWITT, CHARLIE

2 transactions

$2,100

117

KESHISHIAN, MARC D.

3 transactions

$2,100

118

POMPER, BRIAN

2 transactions

$2,100

119

SIMON, DEBORAH

1 transaction

$2,100

120

BELL, DAWN

1 transaction

$2,000

121

BOYLE, DAPHNE

2 transactions

$2,000

122

BRAMWELL, ADAM

2 transactions

$2,000

123

BUNDSCHUH, RUSSELL

2 transactions

$2,000

124

CURRIE, MARY C.

1 transaction

$2,000

125

DILLON, BRANDON

1 transaction

$2,000

126

FERGUSON, KATHLEEN

2 transactions

$2,000

127

GILL, DEREK

1 transaction

$2,000

128

HALL, JEAN

1 transaction

$2,000

129

HARRIS, SHELDON

4 transactions

$2,000

130

IRBY, WILLIAM

1 transaction

$2,000

131

KEMLER, JAMES

2 transactions

$2,000

132

KHODADOST, FATOLLAH

1 transaction

$2,000

133

KNOX, KENNETH

2 transactions

$2,000

134

KRATZ, SUSAN K.

4 transactions

$2,000

135

LASALA, BARRY

2 transactions

$2,000

136

MEEHAN, LAWRENCE

2 transactions

$2,000

137

MINGOLELLI, MICHAEL

2 transactions

$2,000

138

NAGHIPOUR, HAMIDREZA

1 transaction

$2,000

139

NAISON-PHILLIPS, ERIC

2 transactions

$2,000

140

NEMOVI, MOSTAFA

1 transaction

$2,000

141

PAPPAS, NORMAN A.

2 transactions

$2,000

142

PERRICH, DOROTHY M.

4 transactions

$2,000

143

POLESE, DONALD

1 transaction

$2,000

144

ROBINSON, ELLEN K.

2 transactions

$2,000

145

RUSH, ANDRA M.

1 transaction

$2,000

146

SLAY, BRENT L.

1 transaction

$2,000

147

SPECK, ADAM

1 transaction

$2,000

148

SPICER, TRACY B.

2 transactions

$2,000

149

TOUGH, CAROL L.

2 transactions

$2,000

150

TRIGGER, GRANT R.

2 transactions

$2,000

151

TURLEY, JERI

2 transactions

$2,000

152

WAUN, THOMAS W.

1 transaction

$2,000

153

WEINSTEIN, ANNA

2 transactions

$2,000

154

WORTH, PETER

2 transactions

$2,000

155

MICALI, MARK

3 transactions

$1,900

156

LEA, JASON

2 transactions

$1,800

157

TAYLOR, GORDON

2 transactions

$1,800

158

ARRILLAGA-ANDREESSEN, LAURA

1 transaction

$1,700

159

GUIDA, ALFONSO JR.

2 transactions

$1,700

160

HERMANOFF, SANDY M.

1 transaction

$1,700

161

HOROWITZ, FELICIA

1 transaction

$1,700

162

OBERSCHMIDT, DAVID W.

2 transactions

$1,700

163

PETERSON, CARL

2 transactions

$1,700

164

RAYMOND, LAWRENCE B.

2 transactions

$1,700

165

SILENOK, ELENA

1 transaction

$1,700

166

KAROUB, ALICE M.

2 transactions

$1,670

167

LEWIS, BILL R.

1 transaction

$1,655

168

CHEWNING, KIRK

1 transaction

$1,650

169

JOHNSON, DAVID

1 transaction

$1,650

170

ADAMS, RANDY

3 transactions

$1,500

171

ARYA, MANOOCHER

1 transaction

$1,500

172

ASSARIAN, GARY

1 transaction

$1,500

173

ATESIAN, HOWARD P.

1 transaction

$1,500

174

BALDEVIA, LORRIE

1 transaction

$1,500

175

BERMAN, ELLEN

1 transaction

$1,500

176

BERNSTEIN, MATTHEW

2 transactions

$1,500

177

BLOWER, SUSAN

2 transactions

$1,500

178

CHARLES, STEPHEN

2 transactions

$1,500

179

CHENEY, BRADFORD

2 transactions

$1,500

180

DE BOOR, CARL RAE

3 transactions

$1,500

181

EDEN, BRENT

2 transactions

$1,500

182

FAZILI, SAMIRA

1 transaction

$1,500

183

FOLEY, FRED

3 transactions

$1,500

184

JAMIAN, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,500

185

KESSINGER, JOHN

2 transactions

$1,500

186

KIM, JULIE

1 transaction

$1,500

187

KREIKEMEIER, CHAD

2 transactions

$1,500

188

KROVI, VENKATASATYA

1 transaction

$1,500

189

KURIAN, THOMAS

1 transaction

$1,500

190

LUNDE, JOHN

3 transactions

$1,500

191

MASON, MARCUS

1 transaction

$1,500

192

MCKENNA, REGIS

2 transactions

$1,500

193

MERRIGAN, JOHN A.

1 transaction

$1,500

194

POWELL, ROBERT TYLER

1 transaction

$1,500

195

ROBERTSON, DAVID

1 transaction

$1,500

196

SHOUSHANIAN, MARTIN A.

1 transaction

$1,500

197

SIDDIQUI, ARSHI

1 transaction

$1,500

198

SMITH, WALLACE

1 transaction

$1,500

199

SPIELER, NORMAN

1 transaction

$1,500

200

SUNTAG, AARON

1 transaction

$1,500

201

WILLIAMS, PETER

2 transactions

$1,500

202

GILBERT, DAN

1 transaction

$1,400

203

MITCHELL, KELLY

1 transaction

$1,400

204

WALSH, BRENDAN

2 transactions

$1,300

205

BLINDER, MADELINE

1 transaction

$1,250

206

KELLY, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,200

207

OKEEFE, PETER

1 transaction

$1,200

208

RYAN, JIMMY

1 transaction

$1,200

209

IJAZ, MUJEEB

1 transaction

$1,150

210

WHITEHORN, SAM E.

1 transaction

$1,050

211

ADAMS, C. DAN

1 transaction

$1,000

212

AMBROSE, STEVEN

1 transaction

$1,000

213

ANDERSON, KAREN

1 transaction

$1,000

214

ANDERSON, PEGGY

1 transaction

$1,000

215

ANTISHIN, DIANE

1 transaction

$1,000

216

ANTONE, N. PETER

1 transaction

$1,000

217

ASHFORD, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,000

218

BAKER, CALEB

1 transaction

$1,000

219

BARNWELL, SAM

1 transaction

$1,000

220

BASMAJIAN, ROGER

1 transaction

$1,000

221

BEHM, MICHAEL J.

1 transaction

$1,000

222

BERGEN, DON

1 transaction

$1,000

223

BIEBER, RONALD J.

1 transaction

$1,000

224

BIGGS, RAYMOND A.

1 transaction

$1,000

225

BOZZELLA, JOHN T.

1 transaction

$1,000

226

BREAUX, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,000

227

BRENEMAN, JEFFREY

1 transaction

$1,000

228

BREWER, MARK C.

1 transaction

$1,000

229

BROGAN, MICHAEL J.

1 transaction

$1,000

230

BROITMAN, ELANA

1 transaction

$1,000

231

BRUZZANO, MARCO

1 transaction

$1,000

232

BURNS, RICHARD

1 transaction

$1,000

233

BUSCHER, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,000

234

CADE, GREGORY

1 transaction

$1,000

235

CAPUANO, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$1,000

236

CHAVEZ, JOANN

1 transaction

$1,000

237

COLLINS, BARRY

1 transaction

$1,000

238

COLLINS, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,000

239

CONNORS, NORA

1 transaction

$1,000

240

COOK, DAVID A.

1 transaction

$1,000

241

COOPER, GEORGE

1 transaction

$1,000

242

DASCHLE, NATHAN

1 transaction

$1,000

243

DAUST, ROXANNE

1 transaction

$1,000

244

DEHGHAN, BEHJAT

1 transaction

$1,000

245

DELEVORYAS, NANCY

1 transaction

$1,000

246

DEMERS, RAYMOND Y.

1 transaction

$1,000

247

DININO, PAUL

1 transaction

$1,000

248

DROSTE, EDWARD

1 transaction

$1,000

249

DUCATO, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$1,000

250

ENOCH, QUINCY

1 transaction

$1,000

251

ESSERMAN, SUSAN

1 transaction

$1,000

252

FARRELL, M. BRENNAN

1 transaction

$1,000

253

FERRIBY, ROBIN

1 transaction

$1,000

254

FICK, ERIC

1 transaction

$1,000

255

FINKEL, ROBERT J.

1 transaction

$1,000

256

FINN, JAMES

1 transaction

$1,000

257

FRIEDBERG, RICHARD M.

1 transaction

$1,000

258

FROELICH, CRAIG

1 transaction

$1,000

259

GAGNON, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,000

260

GEISSINGER, ANNE

2 transactions

$1,000

261

GERRISH, CAMPBELL

2 transactions

$1,000

262

GIBBS, THOMAS

1 transaction

$1,000

263

GOODMAN, WILLIAM

1 transaction

$1,000

264

GREENBERG, RONALD

1 transaction

$1,000

265

GREENE, MARGARET E.

2 transactions

$1,000

266

GUPTA, ASHOK K.

2 transactions

$1,000

267

HAIDLE, ANDREA T.

2 transactions

$1,000

268

HALLAHAN, KATE

1 transaction

$1,000

269

HEALD, RAY

2 transactions

$1,000

270

HEYDON, PETER N.

1 transaction

$1,000

271

HILL, JOEL

1 transaction

$1,000

272

HODGES, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$1,000

273

HOLMES, JAMES M.

1 transaction

$1,000

274

HOON, PHILIP

1 transaction

$1,000

275

HORAN, TERENCE

1 transaction

$1,000

276

HOROWITZ, BARBARA

1 transaction

$1,000

277

HUSTON, BLAKE

2 transactions

$1,000

278

JAMIAN, GREGORY

1 transaction

$1,000

279

JENSEN, JESSICA

1 transaction

$1,000

280

JINGOZIAN, PAUL

1 transaction

$1,000

281

JOHNSON, ARTHUR C.

1 transaction

$1,000

282

JOHNSON, CHARLES

1 transaction

$1,000

283

JONES, JONATHON

1 transaction

$1,000

284

KAZEROUNIAN, JILA

1 transaction

$1,000

285

KEATING, PETER M.

1 transaction

$1,000

286

KESSLER, GARY

1 transaction

$1,000

287

KNISELY, EVAN

1 transaction

$1,000

288

KOH, GRACE

1 transaction

$1,000

289

KRETZSCHMAR, RICHARD

1 transaction

$1,000

290

KRIEG, MARTHA

2 transactions

$1,000

291

KUNZ, JAMES W.

1 transaction

$1,000

292

LAMPARTER, MARY

1 transaction

$1,000

293

LAMPARTER, RON

1 transaction

$1,000

294

LARSEN, DINAH

1 transaction

$1,000

295

LAUER, TREVOR P.

1 transaction

$1,000

296

LEE, DENISE M.

1 transaction

$1,000

297

LEE, PATRICK

1 transaction

$1,000

298

LINGLE, CHRISTOPHER

1 transaction

$1,000

299

LIPSEY, RACHEL

1 transaction

$1,000

300

LOVE, KIMBERLY

1 transaction

$1,000

301

LOVIN, BRANDON

1 transaction

$1,000

302

MAKI, BRETT A.

1 transaction

$1,000

303

MALARKEY, TIMOTHY

1 transaction

$1,000

304

MANLEY, RICHARD

1 transaction

$1,000

305

MANTZ, JONATHAN

1 transaction

$1,000

306

MAXFIELD, MELISSA

1 transaction

$1,000

307

MILLER, RACHEL

1 transaction

$1,000

308

MOHLER, MARGARET A.

1 transaction

$1,000

309

MONSIF, SHANNON

1 transaction

$1,000

310

MOSKWA, PATTI ANN

1 transaction

$1,000

311

MUKKAMALA, BOBBY

1 transaction

$1,000

312

MUSTIN, LINK

1 transaction

$1,000

313

NETTERFIELD, KIM

1 transaction

$1,000

314

NEWHARD, ELEANOR

1 transaction

$1,000

315

NYHOLM, ALLISON

1 transaction

$1,000

316

OGDEN, JUDITH

2 transactions

$1,000

317

OLSON, ERIK

1 transaction

$1,000

318

PAGANO, ED

1 transaction

$1,000

319

PARETSKY, SARA

1 transaction

$1,000

320

PAUL, MATTHEW T.

1 transaction

$1,000

321

PERLMUTTER, NATHAN

1 transaction

$1,000

322

PERRY, EDMUND

1 transaction

$1,000

323

PLUNKETT, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$1,000

324

PLYBON, ROBERT

1 transaction

$1,000

325

POERSCH, JENNIFER

1 transaction

$1,000

326

PRATT, EVAN

1 transaction

$1,000

327

QUINN, THOMAS H.

1 transaction

$1,000

328

RAFFAELLI, JOHN D.

1 transaction

$1,000

329

ROGERS, JOHN W. JR.

1 transaction

$1,000

330

ROLLING, MARK

1 transaction

$1,000

331

ROSOWSKI, ROBERT B.

1 transaction

$1,000

332

RUEDIGER, STEPHEN

1 transaction

$1,000

333

RUUD, DAVID S.

1 transaction

$1,000

334

RYAN, JAMES

1 transaction

$1,000

335

SARKESIAN, PETER

1 transaction

$1,000

336

SCHWIND, JEROME E.

1 transaction

$1,000

337

SHEWCRAFT, SCOTT

1 transaction

$1,000

338

SHROYER, JULIE E.

2 transactions

$1,000

339

SILVERMAN, STEPHANIE

1 transaction

$1,000

340

SIMON, NEAL S.

1 transaction

$1,000

341

SIMPSON, MICHAEL

2 transactions

$1,000

342

SINGH, JASPREET

1 transaction

$1,000

343

SIRACUSE, HELEN

1 transaction

$1,000

344

SOSNICK, SUSAN M.

2 transactions

$1,000

345

STUPAK, BART T.

1 transaction

$1,000

346

SWARTZ, STEPHEN

1 transaction

$1,000

347

TATE, DANIEL JR

1 transaction

$1,000

348

THOMAS, DAVID

1 transaction

$1,000

349

THOMAS, SAMUEL BUZZ III

1 transaction

$1,000

350

TODD, WILL

1 transaction

$1,000

351

VAN DUSEN, GEORGE

1 transaction

$1,000

352

VAN HEUVELEN, ROBERT

1 transaction

$1,000

353

VEALENCIS, JOE

1 transaction

$1,000

354

WALKER, BRAD

1 transaction

$1,000

355

WALSH, KEVIN

1 transaction

$1,000

356

WARE, MARK

1 transaction

$1,000

357

WARNER, RICHARD

1 transaction

$1,000

358

WATSON, JOHN S.

1 transaction

$1,000

359

WEBSTER, PETER

1 transaction

$1,000

360

WERNER, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$1,000

361

WEXLER, DAVID

2 transactions

$1,000

362

WILLIAMS, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$1,000

363

WINSLOW, SALLY

2 transactions

$1,000

364

WOODY, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$1,000

365

ZANGENEH, KARIM

1 transaction

$1,000

366

MATLOCK, MARK

1 transaction

$970

367

KATZ, JORDON

1 transaction

$950

368

MULLIN, PETER W.

1 transaction

$900

369

SANFORD, JOHN

1 transaction

$800

370

SCHWARTZ, ARI

1 transaction

$800

371

ADRABI, JONATHAN

1 transaction

$750

372

O'BRIEN, LAWRENCE F. III

1 transaction

$750

373

ALIX, JAY

1 transaction

$700

374

CRANWELL, WILLIAM C.

1 transaction

$700

375

BLIGHT, CATHY

1 transaction

$600

376

GALEANA, CARL

1 transaction

$600

377

MORGANROTH, MAYER W.

1 transaction

$600

378

MOSS, SIDNEY

1 transaction

$600

379

TEJRAL, AMY

1 transaction

$600

380

WESLEY, CORNELIA

1 transaction

$600

381

BHUTA, JED

1 transaction

$550

382

PAYNTER, RANN

1 transaction

$533

383

AGGARWAL, RAGHAV

1 transaction

$500

384

ALAFCHI, MOHAMMAD

1 transaction

$500

385

ALMURAISI, NAGAT

1 transaction

$500

386

ANAYA, WILLIAM

1 transaction

$500

387

ARABIA, CHERIE

1 transaction

$500

388

ARONSON, LAUREN

1 transaction

$500

389

BARENS, KRISTI

1 transaction

$500

390

BECKHUSEN, ERIC

1 transaction

$500

391

BLANKLEY, JOHN

1 transaction

$500

392

BONO, RANDALL

1 transaction

$500

393

BRADLEY, KEVIN W.

1 transaction

$500

394

BRATHWAITE, PAUL A.

1 transaction

$500

395

BRIM, REMY

1 transaction

$500

396

BROWN, CYNTHIA

1 transaction

$500

397

BURTON, STEPHEN R.

1 transaction

$500

398

CALLE, JON

1 transaction

$500

399

CAMPBELL, THOMAS

1 transaction

$500

400

CATTON, JACK

1 transaction

$500

401

CHASE, NELSON

1 transaction

$500

402

COCKRELL, ERIC

1 transaction

$500

403

COHN, ALAN

1 transaction

$500

404

COOPERMAN, JOEL

1 transaction

$500

405

CORUM, KENTON R.

1 transaction

$500

406

DABANIAN, JUDITH C.

1 transaction

$500

407

DARAKJIAN, ARA

1 transaction

$500

408

DAVIS, CHRISTOPHER

1 transaction

$500

409

DAVIS, GILBERT R.

1 transaction

$500

410

DE BURLO, C. RUSSELL

1 transaction

$500

411

DENENFELD, PAUL J.

1 transaction

$500

412

DENHAM, LORI

1 transaction

$500

413

DEOL, SATVIR

1 transaction

$500

414

DONG, TOM

1 transaction

$500

415

DRISCOLL, JERRY

1 transaction

$500

416

DROBAC, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$500

417

DUDZIK, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$500

418

DUNN, BARBARA

1 transaction

$500

419

EICHLER, EDWIN H.

1 transaction

$500

420

ELLIOTT ANDAHAZY, MORGAN

1 transaction

$500

421

EMANUEL, ADAM

1 transaction

$500

422

ERB, JUDITH L.

1 transaction

$500

423

ERVIN, FRANK W. III

1 transaction

$500

424

ESQUITH, STEPHEN

1 transaction

$500

425

EUGENE, LOVASCO

1 transaction

$500

426

EVENSON, VERNON

1 transaction

$500

427

FARRIS, RYAN

1 transaction

$500

428

FEI, ROBERT

1 transaction

$500

429

FIELDS, ANDREW

1 transaction

$500

430

FISH, GRETCHEN

1 transaction

$500

431

FORRESTER, TERRY

1 transaction

$500

432

FOSTER, BRENDA

1 transaction

$500

433

FRANK, SARA B.

1 transaction

$500

434

GARDINER, JOHN

1 transaction

$500

435

GARGARO, EUGENE A. JR

1 transaction

$500

436

GARNER, ROBERT

1 transaction

$500

437

GAZDA, ELAINE H.

1 transaction

$500

438

GENTILLE, SALLY

1 transaction

$500

439

GUZIK, JOHN

1 transaction

$500

440

HALE, ROBERT

1 transaction

$500

441

HARDISON, ROBERT

1 transaction

$500

442

HARDY, LAURA

1 transaction

$500

443

HARTWICK, SHANNEN

1 transaction

$500

444

HAYNES, SARAH

1 transaction

$500

445

HEITNER, KENNETH

1 transaction

$500

446

HETTINGER, LUKE

1 transaction

$500

447

HICKS, MATTHEW

1 transaction

$500

448

HIEBER, ERIC

1 transaction

$500

449

HOLMES, BOB

1 transaction

$500

450

HOLTZ, JUDITH A.

1 transaction

$500

451

HONNOLD, TERESA R.

1 transaction

$500

452

HOOSANG, CHRISTOPHER P.

1 transaction

$500

453

HUCK, DAVID E.

1 transaction

$500

454

HUMPHREY, LEE

1 transaction

$500

455

HURST, BRET

1 transaction

$500

456

ISRAELYAN, SOUREN

1 transaction

$500

457

JACKSON, CARLOS

1 transaction

$500

458

JENSEN, CAROL

1 transaction

$500

459

JOHNSON, CAROLYN J.

1 transaction

$500

460

JOHNSON, JEFFREY

1 transaction

$500

461

JOHNSON, SHANE

1 transaction

$500

462

JUDD, TERAN

1 transaction

$500

463

KAMENS, MARY S.

1 transaction

$500

464

KATZ, ANN F.

1 transaction

$500

465

KELLEMS, CHRISTINE

1 transaction

$500

466

KELLY, KENNETH

1 transaction

$500

467

KEZELIAN, HARRY A. III

1 transaction

$500

468

KITCHENMASTER, JOYCE

1 transaction

$500

469

KLEIN, BENJAMIN

1 transaction

$500

470

KOCHERIL, PAUL

1 transaction

$500

471

KOPELMAN, JEFFREY

1 transaction

$500

472

KOTT, JONATHAN

1 transaction

$500

473

KULHANJIAN, PAUL

1 transaction

$500

474

LAGANGA, SCOTT

1 transaction

$500

475

LAMBERT, SANDRA

1 transaction

$500

476

LARSON, MYRA

1 transaction

$500

477

LETOURNEAU, DARIN

1 transaction

$500

478

LEWIN, ANDREW

1 transaction

$500

479

LIPAR, ANDREW G.

1 transaction

$500

480

LURIE, ALEXANDER D.

1 transaction

$500

481

MA, ANA

1 transaction

$500

482

MACFARLANE, JOHN T.

1 transaction

$500

483

MAGUIRE, PATRICK

1 transaction

$500

484

MAHONY, SHEILA

1 transaction

$500

485

MAMASSIAN, GREGORY

1 transaction

$500

486

MANOCHERIAN, BERNICE

1 transaction

$500

487

MARSHALL, TIMOTHY G.

1 transaction

$500

488

MARTIN, KENNETH B.

1 transaction

$500

489

MATTESON, NORMA

1 transaction

$500

490

MATTHEWS, JANE

1 transaction

$500

491

MCCLINTOCK, JANET M.

1 transaction

$500

492

MCKEAN, KATHERINE

1 transaction

$500

493

MCKEONE, JAMES

1 transaction

$500

494

MCKIE, KEVIN

1 transaction

$500

495

MCNAMARA, PATRICK

1 transaction

$500

496

MEADE, HEATHER

1 transaction

$500

497

MELMAN, MAARTHA

1 transaction

$500

498

MICHELOTTI, ROBERT J.

1 transaction

$500

499

MILLER, DEBORAH L.

1 transaction

$500

500

MONTGOMERY, JANET

1 transaction

$500

501

MOON, LAWRENCE E.

1 transaction

$500

502

MOORE, JUDITH

1 transaction

$500

503

MOORE, MAURICE

1 transaction

$500

504

MUGAR, CAROLYN

1 transaction

$500

505

MULLEN, MIKE

1 transaction

$500

506

NARAYAN, SESHADRI

1 transaction

$500

507

NICKEL, CLAUDIA

1 transaction

$500

508

NORCROSS, JULIE

1 transaction

$500

509

NUNLEY, NICHOLAS

1 transaction

$500

510

ONEILL, MARTIN

1 transaction

$500

511

OROSZ, JOEL J.

1 transaction

$500

512

OSENBERG, THOMAS

1 transaction

$500

513

OSTRO, ZACHARY

1 transaction

$500

514

OUDSEMA, ROBERT N. JR

1 transaction

$500

515

PALMER, TIM

1 transaction

$500

516

PANDRANGI, DAMAYANTHI V.

1 transaction

$500

517

PANZA, LUCIA

1 transaction

$500

518

PERRY, DAVID

1 transaction

$500

519

PFEUFFER, SHARON

1 transaction

$500

520

PHILLIPS, MATT

1 transaction

$500

521

PHILLIPS, MATTHEW

1 transaction

$500

522

PITTLEMAN, ETHAN

1 transaction

$500

523

PITTS, LAWRENCE

1 transaction

$500

524

QUEISSER, BRAD

1 transaction

$500

525

RABEN, MARGARET MARY

1 transaction

$500

526

RANKIN, VIRGINIA

1 transaction

$500

527

RAYMOND, LISA

1 transaction

$500

528

REILLY, EDWARD

1 transaction

$500

529

REISS, BILLIE

1 transaction

$500

530

RIGGS, JIMMY W.

1 transaction

$500

531

RILEY, MICHAEL V.

1 transaction

$500

532

ROSEN, ERIC

1 transaction

$500

533

ROSENBERG, VALERIE

1 transaction

$500

534

ROSENKRANDS, MARGARET R.

1 transaction

$500

535

ROSENSTOCK, JASON

1 transaction

$500

536

ROTHSCHILD, GREGG

1 transaction

$500

537

RUBENFIRE, MELVYN

1 transaction

$500

538

SABOURIN, DONALD

1 transaction

$500

539

SALO, AMY

1 transaction

$500

540

SAMET, CYRUS

1 transaction

$500

541

SANCHEZ-MURPHY, ANTONIA

1 transaction

$500

542

SCHULZ, JEAN F.

1 transaction

$500

543

SCRIBNER, CHRIS

1 transaction

$500

544

SEARS, KINGSLEY G. JR.

1 transaction

$500

545

SEDILLO, MARY A.

1 transaction

$500

546

SENECO, FRANCIS

1 transaction

$500

547

SENECO, FRANK

1 transaction

$500

548

SIEROTY, ALAN

1 transaction

$500

549

SMITH-OLSON, DEBORAH

1 transaction

$500

550

SRIVASTAVA, AJAY

1 transaction

$500

551

STRASBERG, TREGER S.

1 transaction

$500

552

SUES, ROB

1 transaction

$500

553

TANENBAUM, JUDITH

1 transaction

$500

554

THELEN, MARK

1 transaction

$500

555

THOMPSON, BRADLEY

1 transaction

$500

556

THORNELL, PAUL

1 transaction

$500

557

TOBIN, JUDY

1 transaction

$500

558

TOLL, SHELDON

1 transaction

$500

559

TORSHIAI, GLENN

1 transaction

$500

560

TOTTY, COLLEEN

1 transaction

$500

561

TURNER, FRED

1 transaction

$500

562

VECCHIONE, PAUL

1 transaction

$500

563

VETTE, SUSAN

1 transaction

$500

564

WALDMAN, BARRY P.

1 transaction

$500

565

WALKER-MILLER, CARLA

1 transaction

$500

566

WALTER, SARAH

1 transaction

$500

567

WALTZ, MALINDA H.

1 transaction

$500

568

WEISS, JEFFREY

1 transaction

$500

569

WILCOX, JUDY

1 transaction

$500

570

WOHLLEB, MARY

1 transaction

$500

571

YURK, PAM

1 transaction

$500

572

ZAMANI, BATOOL

1 transaction

$500

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Lummis, Cynthia M. [R-WY]

ID: L000571

Top Contributors

HEGYI, ALBERT P

1ST FINANCIAL BANK USA • BANKER

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Dec 6, 2023

MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualASPEN, CO

$6,600

Sep 26, 2024

MANDELBLATT, ERIC

SOROBAN CAPITAL PARTNERS LP • MANAGING PARTNER

IndividualASPEN, CO

$6,600

Sep 26, 2024

SAMANI, PYAHM

IndividualAUSTIN, TX

$5,800

Aug 8, 2023

CASCARILLA, MARISSA

NA • HOMEMAKER

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,700

Apr 1, 2024

CASCARILLA, CHARLES

PAXOS • CEO

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,700

Apr 1, 2024

DOWNS, RAISSA

TARPLIN, DOWNS AND YOUNG, LLC • CONSULTANT

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,600

Dec 12, 2024

SCARAMUCCI, ANTHONY

SKYBRIDGE • MANAGING PARTNER

IndividualPLANDOME, NY

$3,435

Jul 30, 2024

HOBART, ROBERT

VENTURE GOVERNMENT STRATEGIES • CONSULTANT

IndividualNASHVILLE, TN

$3,435

Aug 5, 2024

HOLDING, KATHLEEN MS.

SUNLIGHT RANCH CO. • EXECUTIVE

IndividualDAYTON, WY

$3,300

Dec 6, 2023

Sen. Curtis, John R. [R-UT]

ID: C001114

Top Contributors

KELLER INVESTMENTS PROPERTIES

OrganizationCENTERVILLE, UT

$29,800

Dec 31, 2023

SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationSUQUAMISH, WA

$1,000

Aug 14, 2024

TENNIS & SUN LC

OrganizationSALT LAKE CITY, UT

$1,000

Jun 10, 2024

BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$1,000

Mar 25, 2024

FUGAL COMMERCIAL SERVICES INC

OrganizationSALT LAKE CITY, UT

$1,000

Sep 13, 2023

STEEL, SHAWN

STEEL & EISNER, LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualSURFSIDE, CA

$10,000

Mar 25, 2024

STEEL, SHAWN

STEEL & EISNER, LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualSURFSIDE, CA

$10,000

Mar 25, 2024

BAKER, PAUL

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualTUCSON, AZ

$6,600

Jun 5, 2024

BAKER, PAUL

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualTUCSON, AZ

$6,600

Jun 5, 2024

BERKLEY, WILLIAM

WRBC • CHAIRMAN

IndividualKEY LARGO, FL

$6,600

Jun 7, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 52 nodes and 74 connections

Total contributions: $74

Top Donors - Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]

Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount

12 Orgs6 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 harmed.

−Big Tech Platformsconfidence 0.80
Section 3(a) and (b) imply that US businesses, including big tech platforms, may face reputational, economic, and legal risks for conducting transactions with entities implicated in human rights abuses in China, which could lead to increased scrutiny and potential losses.
−Private Equity & Hedge Fundsconfidence 0.70
Section 3(b)(1)(C) mentions potential risks of conducting transactions with entities implicated in human rights abuses, which may apply to private equity and hedge funds investing in or doing business with such entities.
−E-commerce & Online Retailconfidence 0.60
Section 3(a) and (b) suggest that ecommerce and retail tech companies may need to exercise caution when dealing with suppliers or partners potentially linked to human rights abuses in China, which could lead to increased compliance costs and reputational risks.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HARMS

Big Tech Platforms$198
from 11 contributions
- BROCK, HUTCH$198

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Strong

Vector: 66%

Pages: 645-647AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill’s focus on training Commerce Department staff and guiding U.S. businesses to identify and avoid entities implicated in forced labor directly supports Project 2025’s international labor objectives of eliminating forced labor, enhancing supply‑chain transparency, and investigating foreign labor violations that harm American workers."

Key themes:forced labor eliminationsupply chain transparencyinternational labor enforcementprotection of workers' rights

— 613 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies l Congress must amend the law so that employers can again have the freedom to make hiring Americans a priority. Despite the significant advantages that preferring citizens over (work-authorized) aliens in hiring would provide to American workers, businesses, and the country at large, such a practice has been illegal since 1986.25 This makes no sense. Alternative View Some conservatives believe that the government has a duty to limit its spending in order to limit how much it takes from American families. This means that when the government spends money, it must find the most econom- ical and effective way to do so. Excessive government spending will be borne by American workers and families through reduced incomes and purchasing power. There may be good reasons to require a certain percentage of American workers on federal contracts, but those decisions should be based on economy and efficiency as opposed to arbitrary quotas. Visa Fraud. American businesses that commit visa fraud and hire illegal immi- grants should not be the beneficiaries of federal spending. But a 2020 report by the Department of Labor’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) examined the depart- ment’s process for excluding employers who commit visa fraud and abuse from federal contracts and found much to be desired. l To protect the American workforce from unscrupulous immigration lawyers, employers, and labor brokers, the department must follow the recommendations of the OIG and institute more robust investigations for suspected visa fraud and speedier debarments for those found guilty. INTERNATIONAL LABOR POLICY Leveling the International Playing Field for Workers. As recent decades of intense import competition and offshoring have made clear, American workers suffer when the U.S. opens its markets to foreign nations’ minimal labor standards and exploitative conditions. While federal law already prohibits the importation of goods produced with forced labor, the prohibitions are toothless without effective means of enforcement and cover only the most basic of workers’ rights. The Trump Administration and its United States Trade Representative (USTR) took unprece- dented steps to redress the issue for workers. The U.S.–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) contained the strongest and most far-reaching labor provisions of any free trade agreement (FTA), with protections and commitments to reduce labor abuses and raise wages. It also established new modes of enforcement. For future FTAs, the USTR should replicate the labor provisions of USMCA, especially the provisions to: — 614 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Eliminate all forms of forced or compulsory labor. l Protect workers’ rights to organize and participate voluntarily in a union without employer interference or discrimination. l Create a rapid-response mechanism to provide for an independent panel investigation of denial of labor rights at covered facilities. l Shift the burden of proof by presuming that an alleged violation affects trade and investment, unless otherwise demonstrated. For future authorizations of Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), the President should urge Congress to: l Create mechanisms for supply-chain transparency. l Institute a general prohibition on forced labor conditions. Investigate Foreign Labor Violations That Undermine American Work- ers. The United States’ embrace of globalization has exposed American workers to unfair competition from nations with cheap, abundant, and often exploited labor. American workers have, as a consequence, seen their earning power erode. While negotiating stronger trade agreements with robust labor provisions should be the primary tool with which to regulate international labor competition, the federal government can also take steps to identify the worst labor abuses and rule breakers. DOL’s Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB) plays a critical role in monitor- ing and enforcing the labor provisions of U.S. trade agreements and trade preference programs as well as investigating child labor and human trafficking violations. l The next Administration should focus ILAB investigations on foreign labor violations that do the most to damage American workers’ earning power, specifically regimes that engage in child and forced labor, fail to protect workers’ organizing rights, and permit hazardous or otherwise exploitative working conditions. Alternative/Additional View. Conservatives share a belief in protecting and pro- moting American workers and their families and orienting international policies with Americans’ interests first. Some conservatives believe that the best way to put Amer- ica first is by making America more attractive. In addition to restrictions imposed on other countries, removing existing barriers to American manufacturing, employ- ment, and commerce can help American workers, entrepreneurs, and families.

Trade

Strong

Vector: 63%

Pages: 816-818AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill directly addresses Communist China's economic aggression by targeting forced labor practices in Xinjiang, which aligns with Project 2025's focus on countering China's mercantilist and protectionist trade policies, including reliance on sweatshop labor and technology transfer-forcing mechanisms."

Key themes:Communist China economic aggressionforced labor concernstrade policy responsesupply chain integrityhuman rights abuses in trade

— 783 — Trade tariffs.17 A conservative Administration might do well to look at such a tax as part of its trade agenda. CHALLENGE #2: COMMUNIST CHINA’S ECONOMIC AGGRESSION AND QUEST FOR WORLD DOMINATION18 Among all of its bilateral trade relationships, America’s relationship with Com- munist China is the most fraught with difficulty. The problem is not just that the relentlessly mercantilist and protectionist trade policies that China has pursued ever since its accession to the WTO in 2001 have led to chronic, massive, and ever-expanding trade deficits. Communist China’s economic aggression in the traditional trade policy space is further facilitated by equally aggressive industrial policies and technology transfer–forcing policies that are designed to shift the world’s manufacturing and supply chains to Communist Chinese soil. The Chinese Communist Party’s policy goal is to propel the Chinese economy, but its broader goal is to strengthen Communist China’s defense industrial base and associated warfighting capabilities. That China unabashedly seeks to supplant America as the world’s dominant economic and military power is not in dispute. Rather, it is a prominent feature of Communist Chinese dictator Xi Jinping’s rhet- oric. Xi has promised that the deed will be done by 2049, the 100-year anniversary of the Communist takeover of the Mainland.19 In light of Communist China’s broader geopolitical and military agenda, the American President who takes office in January 2025 must view the U.S.–China trade relationship and associated policy reforms within the context of the broader existential threat posed by Communist China. The question is whether that next President should seek to decouple economically and financially from Communist China as America’s first best response to China’s unrelenting aggression or con- tinue efforts to negotiate with an authoritarian country and brutal dictatorship with a well-established reputation for failing to abide by any agreements it enters. Institutionalized Aggression. Table 5 depicts more than 50 types of policy aggression institutionalized by the CCP across six different categories of such aggression. Viewed as whole, the extent of Communist China’s aggression is breathtaking. At the trade policy level, Communist China relies heavily on a wide range of mercantilist and protectionist tools to protect its own markets and unfairly exploit foreign markets. These instruments of Communist Chinese trade aggression include high tariffs and nontariff barriers, currency manipulation, a heavy reli- ance on sweatshop labor and pollution havens, the dumping of unfairly subsidized exports, and widespread counterfeiting and piracy: Communist China is the world’s largest source of counterfeit and pirated products. In addition, Communist Chinese enterprises benefit from preferential policies that have burdened world markets with subsidized overcapacity. The resultant glut — 784 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise of Communist Chinese exports in turn depresses world prices and pushes foreign rivals out of the global market—steel is a major example.20 Industrial policy tools that further reinforce Communist China’s mercantilist and protectionist trade policies include numerous direct and indirect subsidies to boost exports and the consolidation of heavily subsidized state-owned enterprises into “national champi- ons” that can compete with foreign companies in both domestic and global markets. Communist China also uses a predatory “debt trap” model of economic develop- ment aid that proffers substantial financing to developing countries in exchange for their willingness to mortgage their natural resources and allow Communist China access to their markets. The practical effect of this debt trap model is to give Com- munist China a competitive edge internationally that stems from its preferential access to relatively lower-cost commodities needed in the manufacturing process. These commodities range from bauxite, copper, and nickel to rarer commodities such as beryllium, titanium, and rare earth minerals. As a complement to this debt trap gambit and to exploit its commanding share of a wide range of critical raw materials that are essential to the global supply chain and production of high-technology and high-value-added products, Com- munist China strategically uses protectionist export restraints, including export quotas and export duties. These export restraints thereby restrict access to raw materials such as rare earth, tungsten, and molybdenum that are essential in the high-technology production space. The result is to drive up world prices and thereby put pressure on American and other foreign downstream producers to move their operations, technologies, and jobs to Communist China. American industries that have been affected by Communist China’s export restraints range from steel, chemicals, and electric cars to wind turbines, lasers, semiconductors, and refrigerants. Technology-Forcing Policies. Table 6, extracted from the White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy’s report on Communist China’s economic aggression,21 provides a summary of the various policies the Chinese Communist Party uses to force the transfer of the West’s technologies to Communist Chinese soil. Formally, Communist Chinese industrial policy seeks to promote the “diges- tion, absorption, and re-innovation” of technologies and intellectual property (IP) from around the world.22 As noted in Table 6, this policy is carried out, for example, through state-spon- sored IP theft—coercive and intrusive regulatory gambits to force technology transfer, typically in exchange for limited access to the Chinese market. Commu- nist China’s looting of American technology is further enhanced by “information harvesting” conducted by Communist Chinese nationals who infiltrate U.S. uni- versities, national laboratories, and other centers of innovation. Strategic sectors targeted by Communist Chinese economic espionage have included electronics, telecommunications, robotics, data services, pharmaceuticals, mobile phone

Trade

Moderate

Vector: 64%

Pages: 816-818AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill targets forced labor abuses in China, which corresponds to Project 2025's characterization of sweatshop labor as part of China's trade aggression, but it does not address broader trade tools such as tariffs, decoupling, or industrial policy reforms emphasized in the Project 2025 trade section."

Key themes:China trade aggressionforced laborsweatshop laborhuman rights abuseseconomic policy

Trade

Moderate

Vector: 63%

Pages: 822-824AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on raising awareness and providing guidance to U.S. businesses about forced labor abuses in China, which aligns thematically with Project 2025's broader goal of countering Communist China's economic and human rights abuses. However, it does not implement concrete trade restrictions, tariffs, or financial decoupling measures emphasized in the Project 2025 Trade section."

Key themes:countering China's human rights abusesbusiness accountabilitysupply chain awarenesseconomic pressure on China

— 789 — Trade The following policy options were on the drawing board or in discussion as preparations for a potential Trump second term were being made. These options span the spectrum from purely trade-related like increasing tariffs to cutting off Communist China’s access to American financial markets, research institutions, and consumers. The next American President should strongly consider adopting all of them as a package: l Strategically expand tariffs to all Chinese products and increase tariff rates to levels that will block out “Made in China” products, and execute this strategy in a manner and at a pace that will not expose the U.S. to lack of access to essential products like key pharmaceuticals. l Provide significant financial and tax incentives to American companies that are seeking to onshore production from Communist China to U.S. soil. l Stop Communist China’s abuse of the so-called de minimis exemption, which allows it to evade the tariffs for products valued at less than $800. l Prohibit Communist Chinese state-owned enterprises from bidding on U.S. government procurement contracts (for example, contracts for subway and other transportation systems). l Prohibit the use of Communist Chinese–made drones in American airspace. l Ban all Chinese social media apps such as TikTok and WeChat, which pose significant national security risks and expose American consumers to data and identity theft. l Prohibit all Communist Chinese investment in high-technology industries. l Prohibit U.S. pension funds from investing in Communist Chinese stocks. l Delist any Communist Chinese stocks that do not meet Public Company Accounting Oversight Board standards or, alternatively, close off the Chinese “A shares” stock market to U.S. investment and deregister U.S.- sanctioned Communist Chinese companies. l Prohibit the use of Hong Kong clearinghouses as transit points for American capital investing in the Chinese mainland. l Prohibit the inclusion of Chinese sovereign bonds in U.S. investors’ portfolios. — 790 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Systematically reduce and eventually eliminate any U.S. dependence on Communist Chinese supply chains that may be used to threaten national security such as medicines, silicon chips, rare earth minerals, computer motherboards, flatscreen displays, and military components. l Sanction any companies, including American companies like Apple, that facilitate Communist China’s use of its Great Firewall surveillance and censorship capabilities. l Order the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Department of Justice to contract with U.S.-owned and U.S.-operated artificial intelligence companies that are capable of detecting, identifying, and disrupting both the domestic groups’ and CCP influencers’ social media operations and funding streams using public information as a rapidly available offensive measure. l Reinvigorate and expand the DHS crackdown on the CCP’s use of e-sellers (including third-party sellers) and the shippers and operators of major warehouses such as Amazon, eBay, and Alibaba to flood U.S. markets with counterfeit and pirated goods. l Compel the closure of all Confucius Institutes in the U.S., which serve as propaganda arms of the CCP. l Significantly reduce or eliminate the issuance of visas to Chinese students or researchers to prevent espionage and information harvesting. l Hold the CCP accountable for the COVID-19 virus, which almost certainly originated as a genetically engineered virus from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and do so through the establishment of a presidential commission or select congressional committee that would investigate the origins of the virus; its various costs, both economically and in human life; and the possible means of collecting damages from the CCP, which are likely to rise to the trillions of dollars. If the new U.S. President wishes to defend this country against the serious exis- tential threat posed by Communist China, that President will adopt all of these proposals through the requisite presidential executive orders or memoranda. Effective Trade Policy in the Real World. To conclude this analysis, it is useful to offer brief reflections on a number of key obstacles to implementing the policy initiatives recommended in this chapter. These obstacles include:

Department of Justice

Minimal

Vector: 63%

Pages: 615-617AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on combating forced labor and human rights abuses by China against Uyghurs, while the Project 2025 policy targets the elimination of EEO-1 data collection, disparate impact theory, and related DEI initiatives in U.S. employment law. There is no thematic or policy overlap between the two."

— 583 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies including human-resources classifications and DEI trainings that promote critical race theory. l Eliminate EEO-1 data collection. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission collects EEO-1 data on employment statistics based on race/ ethnicity, which data can then be used to support a charge of discrimination under a disparate impact theory. This could lead to racial quotas to remedy alleged race discrimination. (The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) also has a right to the data EEOC collects.) Crudely categorizing employees by race or ethnicity fails to recognize the diversity of the American workforce and forces individuals into categories that do not fully reflect their racial and ethnic heritage. l Amend Title VII. The next Administration should work with Congress to amend Title VII to prohibit the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from collecting EEO-1 data and any other racial classifications in employment for both private and public workplaces. l Eliminate disparate impact liability. With interracial marriages in America increasing, many Americans do not fit neatly into crude racial categories.1 Under disparate impact theory, moreover, discriminatory motive or intent is irrelevant; the outcome is what matters. But all workplaces have disparities. Congress should: l Eliminate disparate impact as a valid theory of discrimination for race and other bases under Title VII and other laws. Disparities do not (and should not legally) imply discrimination per se. The President should: l Sign an executive order explicitly forbidding OFCCP from using disparate impact in its analysis. l Eliminate OFCCP. The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) exists to enforce Executive Order (EO) 11246.2 That order was originally signed in 1965 to require federal contractors (and subcontractors) to commit to nondiscrimination. It gave enforcement authority to the Department of Labor, up to and including debarment from federal contracting. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has since — 584 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise grown, often making OFCCP’s authority redundant and imposing a second regulatory agency under whose rules businesses must operate. In addition, under EO 11246, the President and DOL can force a huge swath of American employers to comply with rules and regulations based on novel anti- discrimination theories (such as sexual orientation and gender identity theories) that Congress had never imposed by statute. l Rescind EO 11246. The President should eliminate OFCCP by simply rescinding EO 11246. Federal contractors would still be bound by statutory nondiscrimination law but would no longer work under overlapping regimes. (Contractors’ residual obligations under Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act and Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act (VEVRAA) could be enforced by EEOC or DOL.) Contractors also would be less subject to the changing political whims of a President that might impose significant new costs or burdens on the contractors. Sex Discrimination. The Biden Administration, LGBT advocates, and some federal courts have attempted to expand the scope and definition of sex discrimi- nation, based in part on the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County. Bostock held that “an employer who fires someone simply for being homosexual or transgender” violates Title VII’s prohibition against sex discrimination. The Court explicitly limited its holding to the hiring/firing context in Title VII and did not purport to address other Title VII issues, such as bathrooms, locker rooms, and dress codes, or other laws prohibiting sex discrimination. Notably, the Court focused on the status of the employees and used the term “transgender status” rather than the broader and amorphous term “gender identity.” l Restrict the application of Bostock. The new Administration should restrict Bostock’s application of sex discrimination protections to sexual orientation and transgender status in the context of hiring and firing. l Withdraw unlawful “notices” and “guidances.” The President should direct agencies to withdraw unlawful “notices” and “guidances” purporting to apply Bostock’s reasoning broadly outside hiring and firing. l Rescind regulations prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, transgender status, and sex characteristics. The President should direct agencies to rescind regulations interpreting sex discrimination provisions as prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, transgender status, sex characteristics, etc.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Peters, Gary C.

Extending Expired Cybersecurity Authorities Act

119/s/2983

Satellite Cybersecurity Act of 2025

119/s/3404

Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act

119/s/97

Back to All Bills