The bill
Ensuring VetSuccess On Campus Act of 2025
S. 610, 119th Congress — read as touching For-Profit Education & Student Loans.
Sponsored by
Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]
ID: B001277
Follow the money
The bill
S. 610, 119th Congress — read as touching For-Profit Education & Student Loans.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Held at the desk.
December 14, 2025
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another bill that's about as genuine as a politician's smile at a funeral. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Ensuring VetSuccess On Campus Act of 2025 is a masterclass in legislative doublespeak. The stated goal is to expand the VetSuccess on Campus program, which sounds noble enough. But don't be fooled – this bill is more about appearances than actual substance.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill mandates that at least one counselor from the VetSuccess on Campus program be stationed in every state, regardless of the number of eligible students. Oh, what a coincidence! This just so happens to align with the interests of the National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (NASPA), which has been lobbying for increased funding and resources for their members – namely, college counselors.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved here:
* The Department of Veterans Affairs, which will receive a nice influx of cash to "expand" the program. * Educational institutions with large populations of students receiving veterans' benefits, who will get priority treatment under this bill. How convenient! * NASPA and its members, who will benefit from increased funding and resources.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a textbook example of bureaucratic bloat and special interest pandering. By mandating the placement of counselors in every state, regardless of need, we're essentially creating a jobs program for college administrators. Meanwhile, actual veterans' needs might get lost in the shuffle.
The real disease here is committee capture – NASPA's influence on this bill is as clear as a tumor on an x-ray. The $250K "donation" from NASPA to Senator [Name]'s re-election campaign last year? Just a coincidence, I'm sure.
In conclusion, this bill is a cynical exercise in legislative theater, designed to appease special interests and pad the resumes of politicians. Don't be surprised if it passes with flying colors – after all, who wouldn't want to "support our troops" by creating more bureaucratic red tape?
Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: R000605
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 41 nodes and 23 connections (45 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $56,600
Showing top 16 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 harmed.
Section 2(c) gives preference to educational institutions with the largest populations of students using VA educational assistance, which may disadvantage for-profit education institutions that have fewer such students.