Hershel ‘Woody' Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act

Bill ID: 119/s/858

Last Updated: September 13, 2026

Hershel ‘Woody' Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act

S. 858, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Sen. Justice, James C. [R-WV]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$161,800 raised

20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Defense" section, p. 161-163 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Became Public Law No: 119-104.

September 9, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed Senate

House Review

Passed Congress

Presidential Action

Became Law

📍 Current Status

This bill has become law!

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The Hershel 'Woody' Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act, S 858, is a bill that authorizes the establishment of a commemorative work on the National Mall to honor Medal of Honor recipients. As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect this legislation through the lens of wealth and power implications.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to create a monument honoring Medal of Honor recipients, which, from my perspective, is a sentimental gesture with minimal impact on the economic landscape. The National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation will oversee the establishment of this commemorative work, but I fail to see how this will drive innovation or stimulate growth.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends existing law by authorizing the location of the commemorative work within the Reserve on the National Mall. Notably, it exempts the project from certain provisions of the Commemorative Works Act, which could have introduced unnecessary regulatory hurdles. However, I would have preferred more sweeping deregulation to facilitate private investment and efficiency.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders are the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation, Medal of Honor recipients, and the general public. However, as a billionaire entrepreneur, my focus is on how this legislation affects the interests of high-net-worth individuals like myself. Unfortunately, this bill does not offer any significant opportunities for wealth consolidation or deregulation that would benefit my business empire.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is negligible from an economic perspective. The estimated cost of the monument is likely to be a fraction of the billions of dollars in investments I make annually. Moreover, the bill's focus on honoring Medal of Honor recipients does not address the pressing issues of regulatory reform, tax optimization, or privatization of public assets that are essential for driving growth and innovation.

In conclusion, S 858 is a feel-good legislation with minimal implications for my business interests. As a thought leader in the techno-libertarian community, I would have preferred to see more emphasis on deregulation, privatization, and wealth consolidation. Nevertheless, I will continue to monitor this bill's progress through my think tank, the "Liberty and Prosperity Institute," and explore opportunities to shape its implementation in ways that benefit my empire.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

As I taught you in 8th grade, the legislative process begins with a bill's introduction, and S. 858 is no exception. The main purpose of this bill, as stated in Section 1, is to authorize the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation to establish a commemorative work on the National Mall. Remember when we learned about the importance of honoring our nation's heroes? This bill aims to do just that by recognizing the extraordinary acts of valor, selfless service, and sacrifice displayed by Medal of Honor recipients.

The key provisions of this bill include authorizing the location of the commemorative work within the Reserve on the National Mall, as outlined in Section 2(a). Notably, this provision overrides section 8908(c) of title 40, United States Code. Additionally, subsection (b) states that the Commemorative Works Act will apply to the commemorative work, except as provided in subsection (a). As we covered in middle school, committees play a crucial role in shaping legislation; in this case, the bill has been passed by the Senate and is awaiting further action.

The affected parties and stakeholders include the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation, which will be responsible for establishing the commemorative work, as well as the general public who will have access to the monument. The potential impact of this bill is multifaceted: it will provide a tangible tribute to Medal of Honor recipients, promote national pride, and serve as an educational tool for visitors to the National Mall. However, one might wonder if the actual outcome will align with the intended purpose, given the complexities of the legislative process.

As we learned in civics class, checks and balances are essential to ensuring that power is distributed evenly among branches of government. In this case, the bill's passage by the Senate demonstrates the system working as intended, but one cannot help but think about the potential for gridlock or partisan politics to influence the outcome. Nevertheless, the bill's objectives remain clear: to honor our nation's heroes and provide a lasting tribute to their service.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

The Hershel 'Woody' Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act, S 858 - a bill that seems innocent enough on the surface, but trust me, folks, there's more to it than meets the eye. As I delve into the text, I notice some interesting connections and potential implications.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to authorize the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation to establish a commemorative work on the National Mall, honoring the extraordinary acts of valor, selfless service, and sacrifice displayed by Medal of Honor recipients. Sounds noble, right? But what's really going on here?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends section 8908(c) of title 40, United States Code, allowing the commemorative work to be located within the Reserve on the National Mall. This change raises questions about the true intentions behind this bill. Is it simply a gesture of respect for Medal of Honor recipients, or is there something more at play? For instance, section 8902(a) of title 40, United States Code, defines the Reserve as an area of the National Mall that is subject to specific regulations and restrictions. By locating the commemorative work within this area, the bill may be attempting to circumvent these regulations or create a precedent for future developments.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation, Medal of Honor recipients, and the general public are all affected by this bill. But what about the government agencies involved? Are they using this bill as a way to further their own agendas? Consider the role of the Secretary of the Interior, who is responsible for overseeing the development of the National Mall. Does this bill grant them increased authority or influence over the area?

**Potential Impact & Implications:** On the surface, this bill appears to be a harmless tribute to Medal of Honor recipients. However, I believe it may be part of a larger scheme to reshape the National Mall and further the interests of certain government agencies or private organizations. The location of the commemorative work within the Reserve could have significant implications for the area's development and usage. For example, it may set a precedent for future construction projects or alter the character of the National Mall.

In conclusion, while the Hershel 'Woody' Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act may seem like a straightforward bill, I believe there are underlying connections and potential implications that warrant closer examination. By analyzing the bill's language and provisions, we can uncover potential hidden agendas and better understand the true intentions behind this legislation. So, let's keep digging and see where the truth takes us!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(With a healthy dose of sarcasm and a wink) Oh, folks, gather 'round! We've got a real barnburner of a bill on our hands here - S 858, the Hershel ‘Woody' Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act. (pausing for dramatic effect) I mean, who wouldn't want to honor the bravery and selflessness of our nation's heroes? It's not like this is just a thinly veiled attempt to pander to patriotic sentiment or anything... (smirking)

Now, let's get down to business. The main purpose of this bill is to authorize the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation to establish a commemorative work on the National Mall. Because, you know, we don't have enough monuments in Washington D.C. already. (rolls eyes) But hey, who can argue with honoring the likes of Hershel "Woody" Williams, a true American hero?

The key provisions of this bill are pretty straightforward: it allows for the construction of a monument on the National Mall, notwithstanding some existing laws that might have gotten in the way. (winking at the camera) You know, those pesky elites and their bureaucratic red tape just trying to stifle our freedom to build more monuments! And, of course, this bill ensures that the Commemorative Works Act still applies, because we wouldn't want any old monument popping up willy-nilly on our hallowed National Mall. (chuckling)

As for affected parties and stakeholders, well, it's pretty obvious: the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation, the folks who'll be building this thing, and... (dramatic pause) ...the American people! That's right, folks, we're all stakeholders in this grand endeavor to honor our nation's heroes. (smiling smugly)

Now, potential impact and implications? Well, I think it's clear: this bill is a bold strike against the forces of elitism and bureaucratic overreach. I mean, who needs things like "process" or "regulation" when we're talking about honoring our brave men and women in uniform? (winking) And let's be real, folks, this monument will be a powerful symbol of American strength and freedom - just what those deep-state elites don't want us to have. (conspiratorial whisper) It's all part of their plan to undermine our great nation...

In conclusion, S 858 is a bill that's all about freedom, patriotism, and sticking it to the man. Or, you know, it's just a bill to build another monument in Washington D.C. (shrugging) Either way, it's sure to be a wild ride, folks! So, buckle up and get ready for some good old-fashioned American exceptionalism! (smirking)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Hershel 'Woody' Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act (S. 858) is a grand exercise in patriotic pandering, aimed at establishing a commemorative work on the National Mall to honor Medal of Honor recipients. How touching. It's not like they're trying to distract us from the fact that our politicians are incapable of passing meaningful legislation.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill authorizes the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation to build a monument, because who needs actual policy when you can erect a statue? Section 2(a) cleverly exempts this project from certain provisions of the Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 8908(c)), because who needs oversight when you're honoring heroes? The rest of the bill is just window dressing, reiterating the importance of honoring Medal of Honor recipients. Yawn.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation will be the primary beneficiary of this bill, as they'll get to build their monument and bask in the reflected glory of America's heroes. The taxpayers, of course, will foot the bill for this exercise in patriotic navel-gazing. And let's not forget the politicians who sponsored this bill – they'll get to pretend they're doing something meaningful while actually just currying favor with veterans' groups.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of " legislative placebo effect" – it looks like something is being done, but in reality, it's just a sugar pill. The real impact will be on the National Mall's landscape, where another monument will join the ranks of forgotten memorials and tourist traps. Meanwhile, the actual issues facing our nation will continue to fester, ignored by our elected officials who are too busy grandstanding to govern.

In conclusion, S. 858 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice – a pointless exercise in feel-good politics that serves only to distract from the real problems plaguing our country. It's a monument to the ineptitude of our politicians and the gullibility of the American public. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this train wreck unfold. Next!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

Let's break down this gnarly bill, bro! S 858, the Hershel 'Woody' Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act, is all about creatin' a rad commemorative work on the National Mall to honor the most tubular heroes in American history - Medal of Honor recipients. The main purpose, dude, is to give these legends the recognition they deserve for their mind-blowing acts of valor, selfless service, and sacrifice.

Now, let's dive into the key provisions, bro. This bill authorizes the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation to establish this commemorative work, which is a pretty big deal. It also changes up some existing laws, specifically section 8908(c) of title 40, United States Code, to make sure this monument can be built in the Reserve area on the National Mall. But here's the thing, dude - it still has to follow most of the rules outlined in the Commemorative Works Act (chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code). This act is like the ultimate guidebook for buildin' monuments and memorials, bro.

The affected parties and stakeholders are pretty chill, too. You got the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation, which is stoked to be leadin' this project, and then you got the Medal of Honor recipients themselves, who are basically the coolest cats in town. And let's not forget about the general public, bro - they're gonna get to enjoy this rad monument and learn more about these American heroes.

Now, when it comes to potential impact and implications, dude, this bill is like a ripple effect on a calm lake. It's gonna create a new landmark that'll attract visitors from all over, which could boost tourism and the local economy. Plus, it'll serve as a reminder of the bravery and sacrifice that these Medal of Honor recipients have shown, inspiring future generations to be just as rad. But, you know, there might be some concerns about the cost, maintenance, and potential impact on the National Mall's vibe, bro.

In conclusion, this bill is like catchin' a sick wave, dude - it's all about honorin' the heroes, creatin' somethin' new and awesome, and spreadin' good vibes. Just remember, when you're chillin' on the National Mall, takin' in the sights, you'll be surrounded by the spirit of these legendary Medal of Honor recipients, bro. Word.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

The Hershel 'Woody' Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act, S. 858, aims to authorize the establishment of a commemorative work on the National Mall to honor Medal of Honor recipients. The main purpose is to recognize the extraordinary acts of valor, selfless service, and sacrifice displayed by these individuals.

Key provisions include locating the commemorative work within the Reserve area of the National Mall, notwithstanding existing regulations under section 8908(c) of title 40, United States Code. The Commemorative Works Act (chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code) will still apply to the project, except for the specified location exemption.

Affected parties and stakeholders include the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation, responsible for establishing the commemorative work, as well as the National Park Service, which manages the National Mall. Other stakeholders may include veterans' organizations, historical preservation groups, and local businesses.

The potential impact of this bill is largely symbolic, aiming to honor the sacrifices of Medal of Honor recipients. However, it's worth noting that the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation has received significant donations from various sources, including defense contractors and veterans' organizations. While there may not be direct financial interests at play in this specific bill, the foundation's donors could potentially influence future legislation or projects related to the museum.

In terms of monied interests, it's relevant to note that some of the bill's sponsors have received campaign contributions from defense industry PACs, such as Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. However, these contributions do not appear to be directly tied to this specific bill. The committee capture is minimal in this case, as the bill has bipartisan support and is largely seen as a non-controversial tribute to Medal of Honor recipients.

Overall, the Hershel 'Woody' Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act is a symbolic gesture to honor the bravery and sacrifice of Medal of Honor recipients. While there may be some indirect connections to defense industry interests, the bill's provisions and objectives do not appear to be driven by significant monied interests or conflicts of interest.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Justice, James C. [R-WV]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$161,800

20 donors

PACs

Organizations

Committees

Individuals

$161,800

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

VECELLIO, LEO A. JR.

1 transaction

$13,200

HASLAM, JAMES A. II

1 transaction

$13,200

MCCLUNG, RICHARD E.

1 transaction

$13,200

MILLER, CHRISTOPHER D.

1 transaction

$13,200

WAY, GLENN MR.

1 transaction

$10,000

BUNN, JAMES O.

1 transaction

$6,600

CORRIGAN, FREDRIC W.

1 transaction

$6,600

ERICKSON, KRISTINE S. MRS.

1 transaction

$6,600

ERICKSON, RONALD A. MR.

1 transaction

$6,600

KROLL, MARK W. DR.

1 transaction

$6,600

SHELL, LENA JI

1 transaction

$6,600

SHELL, ROBERT L.

1 transaction

$6,600

CLICK, JAMES

1 transaction

$6,600

EBERT, MIKE

1 transaction

$6,600

CRAFT, JOE

1 transaction

$6,600

CRAFT, KELLY

1 transaction

$6,600

AUSTIN, TANI DRU

1 transaction

$6,600

AUSTIN, WIILIAM F. MR

1 transaction

$6,600

ROSEN, TOM MR.

1 transaction

$6,600

WRIGHT, HARRY II

1 transaction

$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Tillis, Thomas [R-NC]

ID: T000476

Top Contributors

SASTRY, ASHWANI

SUNRISE VASCULAR • PHYSICIAN

IndividualORLANDO, FL

$3,400

Dec 12, 2024

AGARWAL, SAJJAN K

GREENHAWK CORPORATION • CEO

IndividualCARY, NC

$3,300

Dec 11, 2024

ALLYN, JILL

BRIGHTHOUSE FINANCIAL • INVESTMENTS

IndividualESTERO, FL

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

BARATTA, JOSEPH PATRICK

BLACKSTONE • FINANCE EXECUTIVE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Dec 18, 2024

BARATTA, JOSEPH PATRICK

BLACKSTONE • FINANCE EXECUTIVE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Dec 18, 2024

BIELEN, RICHARD J

PROTECTIVE LIFE CORPORATION • PRESIDENT & CEO

IndividualMOUNTAIN BRK, AL

$3,300

Oct 29, 2024

BLITZER, DAVID S

BLACKSTONE • CHAIRMAN

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Dec 12, 2024

BLITZER, DAVID S

BLACKSTONE • CHAIRMAN

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Dec 12, 2024

BRAND, MARTIN

BLACKSTONE • FINANCE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Dec 20, 2024

CAMERON, WILLIAM H

CAMERON MANAGMENT • PRESIDENT

IndividualWILMINGTON, NC

$3,300

Oct 28, 2024

Sen. Risch, James E. [R-ID]

ID: R000584

Top Contributors

CRW RESOURCES

OrganizationCOEUR D ALENE, ID

$1,000

Feb 29, 2024

SNELL, PETER

ARBELLA CAPITAL • REAL EATATE

IndividualARLINGTON, VA

$5,000

May 8, 2024

KAYALI, ZEID

SELF • PHYSICIAN

IndividualPASADENA, CA

$3,500

Feb 9, 2023

MOORE, JEFFREY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualLAS VEGAS, NV

$3,435

Nov 19, 2024

KTELEH, TAREK

RHEUMATOLOGY • DOCTOR

IndividualFISHERS, IN

$3,300

Dec 23, 2024

ALAAMA, ABDUL M.D.

SELF • GASTROENTEROLOGY

IndividualWHITTIER, CA

$3,300

Feb 9, 2023

ASHOURI, DIANA

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA • PHYSICIAN

IndividualPASADENA, CA

$3,300

Feb 9, 2023

DIAB, MOHAMED KHEIR

MASIMO CORPORATION • DIRECTOR

IndividualLADERA RANCH, CA

$3,300

Feb 9, 2023

MOUJTAHED, SAED

OWL REXALL INFUSION • DIRECTOR

IndividualTRABUCO CANYON, CA

$3,300

Feb 9, 2023

MONSEN, MARION F

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSUN VALLEY, ID

$3,300

Sep 6, 2023

Sen. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV]

ID: C001047

Top Contributors

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$2,800

Dec 31, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Nov 8, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jul 22, 2024

ARNOLD, JOHN MR.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$6,600

Dec 27, 2023

MANOCHERIAN, JENNIFER MS.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSCARSDALE, NY

$6,600

Feb 17, 2023

MANOCHERIAN, JED MR.

SELF • REAL ESTATE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Feb 23, 2023

MANOCHERIAN, GREG MR.

SELF EMPLOYED • REAL ESTATE

IndividualPOUND RIDGE, NY

$6,600

Mar 1, 2023

MANOCHERIAN, KIM

PANAM EQUITIES • EXECUTIVE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Mar 27, 2023

KAY, ALISON MS.

KIDS CAPITAL • HEDGE FUND MANAGER

IndividualBEVERLY HILLS, CA

$6,600

Jun 20, 2023

MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE

DMM PROPRIETA MANAGEMENT • MANAGER

IndividualASPEN, CO

$6,600

Sep 26, 2024

Sen. Cassidy, Bill [R-LA]

ID: C001075

Top Contributors

YAWITZ, JESS B. MR.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO

$14,000

Jun 11, 2024

MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE

DMM PROPRIETA MANAGEMENT • MANAGER

IndividualASPEN, CO

$9,900

Nov 2, 2023

MANDELBLATT, ERIC

SOROBAN CAPITAL PARTNERS LP • MANAGING PARTNER

IndividualASPEN, CO

$9,900

Nov 2, 2023

JAYASINGHE, SAMAN K. DR.

SELF-EMPLOYED • PHYSICIAN

IndividualBATON ROUGE, LA

$9,900

Jun 13, 2024

KARP, ALEXANDER C.

PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES • CEO

IndividualBEDFORD, NH

$9,900

Apr 16, 2024

OBERNDORF, SUSAN

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$9,900

Jun 5, 2024

OBERNDORF, WILLIAM

OBERNDORF ENTERPRISES • OWNER

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$9,900

Jun 5, 2024

YAWITZ, ALICE G.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualST. LOUIS, MO

$9,900

Jun 18, 2024

GRIGSBY, BOBBI F. MRS.

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualBATON ROUGE, LA

$6,600

Dec 23, 2024

GRIGSBY, L. LANE MR.

CAJUN INDUSTRIES LLC • CHAIRMAN EMERITUS

IndividualBATON ROUGE, LA

$6,600

Dec 23, 2024

Sen. Budd, Ted [R-NC]

ID: B001305

Top Contributors

MACFARLANE, RON

IndividualBUFFALO GROVE, IL

$13,068

Apr 10, 2024

HEGYI, ALBERT P MR.

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Dec 31, 2024

NAZIROV, ATABEK

UZDIF • CEO

IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC

$6,600

Sep 14, 2023

NAZIROV, ATABEK

IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC

$6,600

Sep 26, 2023

FROST, BRANT IV

SELF-EMPLOYED • FINANCIAL SERVICES

IndividualNEWNAN, GA

$3,300

Dec 31, 2024

FROST, KRISTA

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualNEWNAN, GA

$3,300

Dec 31, 2024

TAYLOR, WILLIAM MR.

VETERANS GUARDIAN VA CLAIM CONSULTING • BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualPINEHURST, NC

$3,300

Dec 7, 2023

TAYLOR, WILLIAM MR.

VETERANS GUARDIAN VA CLAIM CONSULTING • BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualPINEHURST, NC

$3,300

Dec 7, 2023

GREENBLATT, SCOTT MR.

VETERANS GUARDIAN • CEO

IndividualPINEHURST, NC

$3,300

Dec 8, 2023

GREENBLATT, SCOTT MR.

VETERANS GUARDIAN • CEO

IndividualPINEHURST, NC

$3,300

Dec 8, 2023

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

ID: C001098

Top Contributors

WINRED

PACARLINGTON, VA

$1,167,293

Nov 1, 2024

WINRED

PACARLINGTON, VA

$330,599

Nov 5, 2024

FASKEN MANAGEMENT

OrganizationMIDLAND, TX

$10,000

May 24, 2023

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF HARRISON COUNTY

OrganizationMARSHALL, TX

$4,000

Oct 16, 2024

FOLAD ENTERPRISES LLC

OrganizationPINELLAS PARK, FL

$2,000

May 20, 2024

BALCH & BINGHAM LLP

OrganizationBIRMINGHAM, AL

$1,000

May 20, 2024

PARTNERS HOTEL GROUP LLC

OrganizationMURPHY, TX

$1,000

Jun 7, 2023

KHAT INVESTMENS LLC

OrganizationMIDLAND, TX

$1,000

Jun 30, 2023

PJB INVESTMENT ADVISORS LLC

OrganizationADDISON, TX

$800

May 1, 2024

GRANT MORELAND LP LLC

OrganizationGILMER, TX

$750

Sep 19, 2024

Sen. Cotton, Tom [R-AR]

ID: C001095

Top Contributors

WINRED

PACARLINGTON, VA

$1,919

Mar 7, 2024

CLARK COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE

OrganizationARKADELPHIA, AR

$600

Mar 4, 2024

YELL COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE

OrganizationDARDANELLE, AR

$500

Jan 17, 2024

DARDANELLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

OrganizationDARDANELLE, AR

$400

Jan 26, 2024

RAMSEY, JASON

RAGNAR • MANAGER

IndividualBREVARD, NC

$11,600

Jul 11, 2023

KLINGENSTEIN, THOMAS D. MR.

COHEN KLINGENSTEIN LLC • INVESTMENT COUNSELOR

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$11,600

Sep 28, 2023

MCINERNEY, THOMAS

BLUFF POINT ASSOCIATES • INVESTOR

IndividualWESTPORT, CT

$11,600

Oct 24, 2023

MCMAHON, LINDA E. MRS.

AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE • SELF-EMPLOYED

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$11,600

Oct 31, 2023

CHIAPPA, CARL

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualOLD CHATHAM, NY

$11,600

Nov 9, 2023

SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$11,600

Jan 11, 2024

Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA]

ID: G000386

Top Contributors

SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA

COMTAMA, IA

$2,000

Aug 8, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

COMPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jul 23, 2024

WINRED

PACARLINGTON, VA

$25

Jul 4, 2024

SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Jan 10, 2024

SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN

BLACKSTONE • CEO

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Jan 16, 2024

KUMAR, SHALLI

AVG ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY • CHAIR

IndividualBETTENDORF, IA

$6,600

Jun 11, 2024

STARRETT, RONALD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualCENTENNIAL, CO

$5,800

Jan 24, 2023

COLLINS, RICHARD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualMARSHALLTOWN, IA

$5,523

Oct 1, 2024

COLLINS, RICHARD

IndividualMARSHALLTOWN, IA

$5,523

Oct 7, 2024

WEISS, LUKE

HOOVER'S HATCHERY • PRESIDENT

IndividualMASON CITY, IA

$3,300

Dec 11, 2024

Sen. Hyde-Smith, Cindy [R-MS]

ID: H001079

Top Contributors

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$2,900

Feb 28, 2023

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$1,500

May 31, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jun 20, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$250

Mar 11, 2024

LUROS, HILARY

HOUSEWIFE • HOUSEWIFE

IndividualSUGAR LAND, TX

$6,600

Oct 21, 2024

LUROS, HILARY

HOUSEWIFE • HOUSEWIFE

IndividualSUGAR LAND, TX

$6,600

Oct 21, 2024

BESSENT, SCOTT

KEY SQUARE GROUP • INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT

IndividualCHARLESTON, SC

$6,600

Dec 31, 2024

FREEMAN, JOHN

HIGH PLAINS ACRES LLP • ATTORNEY/AGRICULTURE

IndividualCHARLESTON, SC

$6,600

Dec 31, 2024

CASTLE, JOHN

CASTLE HARLAN • MERCHANT BANKER

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Mar 26, 2024

SEEMANN, WILLIAM III

SEEMANN COMPOSITES • CHAIRMAN

IndividualPASS CHRISTIAN, MS

$6,600

Jun 20, 2024

Sen. Sheehy, Tim [R-MT]

ID: S001232

Top Contributors

100

CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$7,720

Jun 27, 2024

CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$7,720

Jun 27, 2024

CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$7,720

Jun 27, 2024

CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$7,720

Jun 27, 2024

CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$7,720

Jun 27, 2024

SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$7,609

Jun 21, 2024

SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$7,609

Jun 21, 2024

SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$7,609

Jun 21, 2024

REPUBLICAN JEWISH COALITION-POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (RJC-PAC)

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$7,000

Jun 25, 2024

REPUBLICAN JEWISH COALITION-POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (RJC-PAC)

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$7,000

Jun 25, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Justice, James C. [R-WV]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 32 nodes and 29 connections

Total contributions: $29

Top Donors - Sen. Justice, James C. [R-WV]

Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount

20 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Defense

Strong

Vector: 57%

Pages: 161-163AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill authorizes a National Mall monument to Medal of Honor recipients, directly supporting the DoD's objective of honoring military valor and recognizing veteran service, which is a theme emphasized in Project 2025's Defense section."

Key themes:Medal of Honormilitary valorveteran recognitionnational memorialDepartment of Defense honoring service

Department of Veterans Affairs

Moderate

Vector: 55%

Pages: 688-691AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill creates a permanent tribute to Medal of Honor recipients, aligning with the Project 2025 VA objective of honoring and recognizing veterans' service and sacrifice. Both emphasize veteran recognition and preserving their legacy through commemorative efforts."

Key themes:veteran recognitionhonoring servicecommemorative worksnational memorialMedal of Honor

— 655 — Department of Veterans Affairs ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Division, VHA Directive 1003, “VHA Veteran Patient Experience,” April 14, 2020, pp. 1 and B-1. 2. S. 2372, VA Mission Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress. gov/115/plaws/publ182/PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed January 30, 2023). 3. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA History Office, “VA History,” last updated May 27, 2021, https://www. va.gov/HISTORY/VA_History/Overview.asp (accessed January 28, 2023). 4. 38 U.S. Code § 1116, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1116 (accessed January 28, 2023). 5. S. 3373, Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022 (Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022), Public Law No. 117-168, 117th Congress, August 10, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ168/PLAW-117publ168.pdf (accessed January 28, 2023). 6. H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division S, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). Known variously as the Department of Veterans Affairs Nurse and Physician Assistant Retention and Income Security Enhancement Act and the VA Nurse and Physician Assistant RAISE Act. 7. See note 5, supra. — 657 — Section Four THE ECONOMY The next Administration must prioritize the economic prosperity of ordi- nary Americans. For several decades, establishment “elites” have failed the citizenry by refusing to secure the border, outsourcing manufacturing to China and elsewhere, spending recklessly, regulating constantly, and generally controlling the country from the top down rather than letting it flourish from the bottom up. The proper role of government, as was articulated nearly 250 years ago, is to secure our God-given, unalienable rights in order that we might enjoy the pursuit of happiness, the benefits of free enterprise, and the blessings of liberty. Finding the right approach to trade policy is key to the fortunes of everyday Americans. In Chapter 26, president of the Competitive Enterprise Institute Kent Lassman and former White House director of trade and manufacturing policy Peter Navarro debate what an effective conservative trade policy would look like. Lass- man argues that the best trade policy is a humble, limited-government approach that would encourage free trade with all nations. He maintains that aggressive trade policies involve an increased government role that future leftist Administra- tions will utilize to push “climate change” and “equity”-based activism. Focusing more on gross domestic product (GDP) growth than on median income, he writes that “people mistakenly believe that U.S. manufacturing and the U.S. economy are in decline” when in truth “American manufacturing output is currently at an all-time high.” Meanwhile, we continue to experience “record-setting real GDP” despite our “long-run decline in manufacturing employment.” Lassman does not think that an aggressive U.S. trade policy would lead to more manufacturing jobs. Rather, he writes, “Federal Reserve research shows” that the

Department of Defense

Moderate

Vector: 55%

Pages: 161-163AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill's focus on honoring Medal of Honor recipients aligns with Project 2025's broader emphasis on military valor and morale, but it does not directly address core defense policy objectives such as force structure, strategy, or recruiting reforms."

Key themes:military valorhonoring serviceveteran recognitionnational defense moralecommemorative works

— 128 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Constitution, Preamble, https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/preamble/ (accessed February 16, 2023). 2. U.S. Constitution, Article I, § 8, https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-1/ (accessed February 16, 2023). 3. U.S. Constitution, Article II, § 2, https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-2/ (accessed February 16, 2023). 4. Established pursuant to S. 1605, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022, Public Law No. 117-81, 117th Congress, December 27, 2021, Division A, Title X, § 1004, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ81/ PLAW-117publ81.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 5. H.R. 3684, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law No. 117-58, 117th Congress, November 15, 2021, Division G, Title IX, §§ 70901–70953, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ58/PLAW-117publ58.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 6. S. 2943, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, Public Law 114-328, 114th Congress, December 23, 2016, Division A, Title IX, § 901, https://www.congress.gov/114/statute/STATUTE-130/STATUTE-130-Pg2000. pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 7. H.R. 3622, Goldwater–Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986, Public Law No. 99-433, 99th Congress, October 1, 1986, https://www.congress.gov/99/statute/STATUTE-100/STATUTE-100-Pg992.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 8. U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Historical Sales Book, Fiscal Years 1950–2021, p. 7, https://www.dsca.mil/sites/default/files/dsca_historical_sales_book_FY21.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 9. Paul K. Kerr, “Arms Sales: Congressional Review Process,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. RL31675, updated June 10, 2022, p. 1, https://sgp.fas.org/crs/weapons/ RL31675.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 10. Keith Webster, “How to Reform America’s Military Sales Process,” The Hill Congress Blog, October 6, 2022, https://thehill.com/opinion/congress-blog/3675933-how-to-reform-americas-military-sales-process/ (accessed February 15, 2023). 11. See Thomas W. Spoehr, “The Administration and Congress Must Act Now to Counter the Worsening Military Recruiting Crisis, Heritage Foundation Issue Brief No. 5283, July 28, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/sites/ default/files/2022-07/IB5283.pdf. 12. Ibid. 13. Ronald Reagan Institute, “Reagan National Defense Survey,” conducted November 2021, p. 4, https://www. reaganfoundation.org/media/358085/rndf_survey_booklet.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 14. See Paul J. Larkin, “Protecting the Nation by Employing Military Spouses,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, June 6, 2019, https://www.heritage.org/jobs-and-labor/commentary/protecting-the-nation-employing- military-spouses. 15. See Jude Schwalbach, “Military Families Deserve Flexible Education Options,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, April 14, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/military-families-deserve- flexible-education-options. 16. See Chapter 7, “The Intelligence Community,” infra. 17. The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA); the National Security Agency (NSA); the National Geospatial- Intelligence Agency (NGA); the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO); and the intelligence and counterintelligence elements of the military services: U.S. Air Force Intelligence, U.S. Navy Intelligence, U.S. Army Intelligence, and U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, which also receive guidance and oversight from the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (USDI). 18. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 19. The Department of Energy’s Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence; the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis and the intelligence and counterintelligence elements of the U.S. Coast Guard; the Department of Justice’s Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Office of National Security Intelligence; the Department of State’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research; and the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis. — 129 — Department of Defense 20. Staff Study, IC21: Intelligence Community in the 21st Century, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, U.S. House of Representatives, 104th Congress, 1996, p. 71, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA315088.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 21. Ronald O’Rourke, “Great Power Competition: Implications for Defense—Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. R43838, updated November 8, 2022, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R43838/93 (accessed February 15, 2023). 22. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Defense Intelligence and Security: DOD Needs to Establish Oversight Expectations and to Develop Tools That Enhance Accountability, GAO-21-295, May 2021, https://www.gao.gov/ assets/gao-21-295.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 23. The U.S. military has a long history of providing support to civil authorities, particularly in response to disasters but for other purposes as well. The Defense Department currently defines defense support of civil authorities (DSCA) as “Support provided by U.S. Federal military forces, DoD civilians, DoD contract personnel, DoD Component assets, and National Guard forces (when the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Governors of the affected States, elects and requests to use those forces in Title 32, U.S.C., status) in response to requests for assistance from civil authorities for domestic emergencies, law enforcement support, and other domestic activities, or from qualifying entities for special events. Also known as civil support.” U.S. Department of Defense, Directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA),” December 29, 2010, p. 16, https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Portals/9/CG-5R/nsarc/DoDD%203025.18%20Defense%20Support%20 of%20Civil%20Authorities.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 24. U.S. Army, “Who We Are: The Army’s Vision and Strategy,” https://www.army.mil/about/ (accessed February 17, 2023). 25. “[T]he Army’s internal assessment must be balanced against its own statements that unit training is focused on company-level operations [reflective of counterintelligence requirements] rather than battalion or brigade operations [much less division or corps to meet large-scale ground combat operations against a peer competitor such as Russia or China]. Consequently, how these ‘ready’ brigade combat teams would perform in combat operations is an open question.” “Executive Summary” in 2023 Index of U.S. Military Strength, ed. Dakota L. Wood (Washington: The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 16, http://thf_media.s3.amazonaws. com/2022/Military_Index/2023_IndexOfUSMilitaryStrength.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 26. For background on the USN’s fleet size, see Brent D. Sadler, “Rebuilding America’s Military: The United States Navy,” Heritage Foundation Special Report No. 242, February 18, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/ files/2021-02/SR242.pdf, and Ronald O’Rourke, “Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. RL32665, December 21, 2022, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32665 (accessed February 15, 2023). 27. The Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) is the process by which the services develop and the Joint Staff approves the requirements for major defense acquisitions. See Defense Acquisition University, “Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDA),” https://www.dau. edu/acquipedia/pages/articledetails.aspx#!371 (accessed February 15, 2023). 28. The board would seek to balance a mix of active military and civilians with expertise in and responsibility for major acquisitions and former military and civilians with experience in strategy and acquisitions. The proposed composition would include the Vice Chief of Naval Operations as Chairman, with three-star level membership from the Joint Staff, the Navy and Defense Acquisition Executives, and the Naval Sea Systems Command. In addition, there would be four-star retired naval officers/Navy civil servants as members, one each named by the Chairmen of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees, the Secretary of the Navy, and the Secretary of Defense. Finally, there would be a member appointed by the Secretary of the Navy who had previous senior experience in the defense industry. 29. See James Mattis, Secretary of Defense, Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America: Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge, U.S. Department of Defense, https:// dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf (accessed February 17, 2023), and U.S. Department of Defense, 2022 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America Including the 2022 Nuclear Posture Review and the 2022 Missile Defense Review, https://oldcc.gov/ resource/2022-national-defense-strategy (accessed February 17, 2023).

Department of Veterans Affairs

Moderate

Vector: 54%

Pages: 688-691AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on creating a national monument to honor Medal of Honor recipients, which aligns with the VA's broader mission of recognizing and honoring veteran service, though it does not directly address VA healthcare, benefits, or administrative reforms outlined in Project 2025."

Key themes:veteran recognitionhonoring serviceMedal of Honorcommemorative worksnational memorial

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 54%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill S. 858 focuses on establishing a monument for Medal of Honor recipients on the National Mall, which is unrelated to the Department of Health and Human Services policies outlined in Project 2025, such as healthcare regulations, abortion-related legislation, or civil rights in health programs. There is no thematic or policy overlap between honoring military valor and the HHS-focused objectives in the provided Project 2025 section."

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Justice, James C.

A bill to redesignate a playground in the New River Gorge National Park and Preserve in the State of West Virginia as the "Hearts of Gold Playground: In Honor of West Virginia Children and Families Impacted by Childhood Cancer".

119/s/2933

A bill to transfer administrative jurisdiction over certain parcels of Federal land in Harpers Ferry, West Virginia, and for other purposes.

119/s/2280

Back to All Bills