The bill
Northeastern Arizona Indian Water Rights Settlement Act of 2025
S. 953, 119th Congress β read as touching Construction & Engineering.
Sponsored by
Sen. Kelly, Mark [D-AZ]
ID: K000377
Follow the money
The bill
S. 953, 119th Congress β read as touching Construction & Engineering.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
24 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held.
March 10, 2026
π Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, folks! The Northeastern Arizona Indian Water Rights Settlement Act of 2025 is a beautifully crafted exercise in bureaucratic doublespeak, designed to confuse and obfuscate the true intentions behind this bill.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose of this bill is to settle water rights claims for the Navajo Nation, Hopi Tribe, and San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe. How noble! But let's not be fooled β this is just a cleverly disguised attempt to allocate more water resources to these tribes while pretending to address their long-standing grievances.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill authorizes the ratification of the Northeastern Arizona Indian Water Rights Settlement Agreement, which supposedly resolves all claims to water rights in the state. But what it really does is create a complex web of definitions, allocations, and assignments that will only serve to confuse and enrich lawyers, bureaucrats, and special interest groups.
Some notable provisions include:
* The allocation of 2.8 million acre-feet per year (AFY) of Arizona Lower Basin Colorado River Water to the tribes * The creation of trust funds for each tribe to manage their water resources * The authorization of funding for various water infrastructure projects, including the iina ba - paa tuwaqat'si pipeline
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved in this bill:
* The Navajo Nation, Hopi Tribe, and San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe (the "beneficiaries" of this settlement) * The State of Arizona * The Bureau of Reclamation * Various water districts and conservation groups
But let's not forget the real stakeholders: the politicians who will get to take credit for this "historic" settlement, the lobbyists who will profit from the ensuing bureaucratic chaos, and the lawyers who will feast on the billable hours generated by this legislative monstrosity.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has all the hallmarks of a classic case of "water rights roulette": it's a high-stakes game where everyone claims to be a winner, but in reality, only a select few will benefit. The tribes may get some additional water resources, but at what cost? The state and federal governments will likely end up footing the bill for these allocations, while the real beneficiaries β the politicians and special interest groups β will reap the rewards.
In conclusion, this bill is a masterclass in legislative sleight of hand. It's a cynical exercise in bureaucratic obfuscation designed to confuse and mislead the public. But don't worry, folks β I'm here to cut through the noise and expose the real motivations behind this bill. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch politicians pat themselves on the back for "solving" a problem they created in the first place.
Sen. Kelly, Mark [D-AZ]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: G000574
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 55 nodes and 27 connections (65 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $104,950
Showing top 16 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
Section 10(f)(1) states amounts in the Navajo Nation Water Projects Trust Fund Account may only be used for environmental compliance, planning, engineering activities, and construction of projects designed to deliver potable water to communities. Section 10(b)(1) establishes this account with $2,369,200,000. This provides a clear benefit (funding for construction and engineering) to the construction and engineering industry.
Section 10(b)(4) establishes the Navajo Nation Renewable Energy Trust Fund Account, and Section 10(f)(4) states amounts in this account may only be used to pay the cost of planning, designing, and constructing renewable energy facilities to support the costs of operating the Navajo Nation Water projects and the iina ba - paa tuwaqat'si pipeline. This provides a clear benefit (funding) to the renewable energy industry.
Section 8(a)(1)(E) states the iina ba - paa tuwaqat'si pipeline shall deliver potable water and be capable of delivering from Lake Powell up to 7,100 AFY of potable Colorado River Water to the Navajo Nation for Use in delivering up to 6,750 AFY to serve Navajo communities and up to 350 AFY to serve the San Juan Southern Paiute Southern Area, and up to 3,076 AFY to the Hopi Tribe for Use in delivering up to 3,076 AFY to serve Hopi communities. This water delivery infrastructure likely requires el
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Kelly, Mark [D-AZ])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
A bill to designate the Federal building located at 300 West Congress Street in Tucson, Arizona, as the "Raul M. Grijalva Federal Building".
119/s/2319
A bill to require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey the Pleasant Valley Ranger District Administrative Site to Gila County, Arizona.
119/s/700
ACES Act of 2025
119/s/201