A resolution designating the third week of March 2025 as "National CACFP Week".

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/sres/131

Last Updated: May 21, 2025

A resolution designating the third week of March 2025 as "National CACFP Week".

SRES. 131, 119th Congress — read as touching Hospitals & Health Systems.

The sponsor

Sen. Boozman, John [R-AR]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$77,600 raised

23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

63% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 335-337 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1785; text: CR S1783)

March 13, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

📍 Current Status

Next: The full Senate will vote on whether to pass the bill.

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Analysis of SRES 131: A Resolution Designating the Third Week of March 2025 as "National CACFP Week"**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll cut through the noise and get straight to the point. This resolution is a non-binding, symbolic gesture that designates a week in March as "National CACFP Week." It's a feel-good measure with no tangible impact on my business interests or the broader economy.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this resolution is to raise awareness about the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) and its role in providing nutritious meals and snacks to vulnerable populations. It's a PR stunt, plain and simple.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** There are no significant provisions or changes to existing law in this resolution. It's a ceremonial declaration with no teeth.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* Child care centers and family day care homes * Adult day care facilities and after-school programs * Low-income families and vulnerable populations * Non-profit sponsoring organizations and state agencies

However, as a billionaire entrepreneur, I'm more concerned with the potential implications for my business empire. Fortunately, this resolution has no direct impact on my interests.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this resolution is negligible. It may lead to increased awareness about the CACFP, but it won't drive meaningful change or affect the bottom line of my companies. In fact, I'd argue that this type of symbolic legislation distracts from more pressing issues, such as regulatory reform and tax policy.

In conclusion, SRES 131 is a non-event for my business interests. It's a classic example of Congress engaging in empty symbolism rather than tackling substantive issues that drive economic growth and innovation. As a thought leader, I'll continue to focus on shaping the narrative around policies that truly matter – those that impact my wealth, influence, and control.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a resolution is a type of legislation that expresses the opinion or sentiment of one or both chambers of Congress. In this case, SRES 131 aims to designate the third week of March 2025 as "National CACFP Week".

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this resolution is to raise awareness about the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP), which provides nutritious meals and snacks to children and adults in various care settings. The objectives are to recognize the importance of positive nutrition habits, highlight the program's impact on vulnerable populations, and promote its benefits.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This resolution doesn't actually change any existing laws or create new ones. It simply expresses the Senate's opinion that the third week of March 2025 should be designated as "National CACFP Week". Remember when we learned about the difference between a bill and a resolution? This is a classic example of a non-binding resolution.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* The Department of Agriculture, which administers the CACFP * Child care centers, family day care homes, emergency shelters, adult day care facilities, and after-school programs that participate in the CACFP * Children and adults who receive meals and snacks through the program * Non-profit sponsoring organizations and state agencies that partner with the CACFP

**Potential Impact & Implications:** While this resolution doesn't have any direct policy implications, it may raise awareness about the importance of nutrition education and access to healthy food for vulnerable populations. It could also lead to increased support for the CACFP program and its beneficiaries.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "What's the big deal about designating a week for something?" Well, as we covered in 8th grade civics, symbolic actions like this can have real-world consequences. They can influence public opinion, shape policy agendas, and even inform future legislation. So, it's not just a trivial matter.

I hope that was clear. Next time, maybe you'll remember what we learned about the legislative process...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

(leaning in, lowering voice) Ah, SRES 131, folks. On the surface, it's just a harmless resolution designating a week as "National CACFP Week". But let me tell you, there's more to this than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose is to raise awareness about the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP), which provides meals and snacks to over 4.5 million children and 115,000 adults in various care settings. Sounds noble enough, but what's really going on here?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This resolution doesn't actually change any existing laws or regulations. It's more of a... (pausing for dramatic effect) ...a Trojan horse. By designating a week as "National CACFP Week", the government is subtly promoting the program and its agenda. Think about it, folks. This resolution is essentially a PR stunt to make us feel good about the government's involvement in our children's nutrition.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** On the surface, this affects child care centers, family day care homes, emergency shelters, adult day care facilities, and after-school programs that participate in the CACFP. But what about the real stakeholders? The ones who benefit from this program? I'm talking about the big food corporations that supply these meals and snacks. This resolution is essentially a marketing tool for them.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, here's where things get interesting. By promoting the CACFP, the government is creating a culture of dependency on these programs. What happens when we rely too heavily on the state to feed our children? We lose control over what they eat and how it affects their health. And let's not forget about the data collection aspect. With this program, the government can track what our kids are eating, where they're eating it, and who's providing the food. It's a surveillance state in disguise!

(winking) You see, folks, there's always more to these bills than meets the eye. Wake up, sheeple!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, I've got a real doozy for you tonight. We're diving into the depths of... (dramatic pause) ...SRES 131, a resolution that's going to shake the very foundations of our great nation! (wink)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is all about designating the third week of March 2025 as "National CACFP Week." Now, I know what you're thinking - what in tarnation is CACFP? Well, it stands for Child and Adult Care Food Program, a program that provides meals and snacks to millions of children and adults in child care centers, family day care homes, emergency shelters, and after-school programs. (Sarcastic tone) Oh boy, I can already feel the freedom-loving patriots out there quivering with rage.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This resolution is a real game-changer, folks! It... (dramatic pause) ...designates a week in March as "National CACFP Week." That's it. No changes to existing law, no new regulations, just a nice, harmless resolution that's sure to send shivers down the spines of our nation's enemies. (Rolls eyes)

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Well, this one's a real nail-biter! The affected parties include... (dramatic pause) ...children and adults who receive meals and snacks through CACFP, as well as child care providers and small businesses that benefit from the program. (Sarcastic tone) Oh no, I can already see the elites in Washington salivating at the prospect of controlling what our kids eat.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, this is where things get really interesting! By designating a week as "National CACFP Week," we're sending a powerful message to... (dramatic pause) ...the deep state? The elites? The liberal media? (Wink) Who knows? But seriously, folks, this resolution might actually raise awareness about the importance of nutrition education and healthy eating habits for our nation's most vulnerable populations. (Gasp) What a radical concept!

In conclusion, SRES 131 is a masterclass in... (dramatic pause) ...doing absolutely nothing to advance the cause of freedom or limited government. But hey, who needs substance when you can have symbolism? (Smirk) Stay vigilant, patriots!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, folks! SRES 131 is a shining example of how our esteemed Congress can take a perfectly good idea – supporting nutrition programs for vulnerable populations – and turn it into a meaningless, feel-good exercise in self-congratulation.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill designates the third week of March 2025 as "National CACFP Week" to raise awareness about the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP). Wow, I bet that'll make all the difference. It's not like we have more pressing issues to address.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** None. Zip. Zilch. This is a resolution, folks, which means it's just a fancy way of saying "we're going to pretend to care about this issue without actually doing anything." No changes to existing law, no new funding, no actual support for the CACFP. Just a bunch of empty words.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: child care centers, family day care homes, emergency shelters, adult day care facilities, and after-school programs. You know, the ones who actually do the hard work while our politicians take credit. Oh, and let's not forget the non-profit sponsoring organizations and State agencies that get to pat themselves on the back for their "unique public-private partnership."

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Zero. Zilch. Nada. This resolution is a placebo, folks. It might make some people feel good, but it won't actually change anything. The CACFP will still be underfunded, and vulnerable populations will still struggle to access nutritious food. But hey, at least we'll have a fancy new week to celebrate!

Diagnosis: This bill suffers from a bad case of "Legislative Lip Service-itis," a common affliction in which politicians pretend to care about an issue without actually doing anything meaningful. Symptoms include empty words, lack of substance, and a healthy dose of self-congratulation.

Treatment: A strong dose of reality, followed by actual policy changes that address the underlying issues. But let's be real, folks, that's not going to happen anytime soon.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Bill Summary: SRES 131 - National CACFP Week**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of SRES 131 is to designate the third week of March 2025 as "National CACFP Week" to raise awareness about the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) and its importance in providing nutritious meals and snacks to vulnerable children and adults.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution does not make any changes to existing law, but rather designates a specific week as "National CACFP Week" to promote awareness about the program. The resolution highlights the vital role of positive nutrition habits in the healthy growth of children and the importance of nutrition education for vulnerable populations.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* Children and adults participating in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) * Child care centers, family day care homes, emergency shelters, adult day care facilities, and after-school programs that participate in the CACFP * Non-profit sponsoring organizations and State agencies that partner with these sites to provide meals and snacks * Working families and small businesses that benefit from the program

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The designation of "National CACFP Week" may have several potential impacts and implications:

* Increased awareness about the importance of nutrition education and access to healthy meals for vulnerable populations * Greater recognition of the role of the CACFP in improving health outcomes, such as reduced hospitalization rates and healthier weight gain * Potential increased support for the program from policymakers, stakeholders, and the general public * Enhanced collaboration between non-profit organizations, State agencies, and child care providers to promote healthy eating habits and nutrition education

Overall, SRES 131 aims to raise awareness about the importance of the Child and Adult Care Food Program in promoting healthy eating habits and improving health outcomes for vulnerable children and adults.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this congressional bill, SRES 131, and get the lowdown on what it's all about.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This resolution is all about designating the third week of March 2025 as "National CACFP Week". The main objective is to raise awareness about the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP), which provides daily meals and snacks to over 4.5 million kids and 115,000 adults in child care centers, family day care homes, emergency shelters, and after-school programs.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The resolution doesn't make any changes to existing law, but rather reaffirms the importance of positive nutrition habits for kids and vulnerable populations. It also highlights the innovative public-private partnership between CACFP sites and non-profit sponsoring organizations or state agencies. The resolution designates a specific week in March 2025 as "National CACFP Week", which is more like a symbolic gesture to raise awareness about the program.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties include:

* Children and adults receiving meals and snacks through CACFP * Child care providers, especially those in low-income areas or rural communities * Non-profit sponsoring organizations and state agencies partnering with CACFP sites * Working families and small businesses benefiting from the program

**Potential Impact & Implications** The resolution has several implications:

* Raising awareness about CACFP can lead to increased funding and support for the program, which benefits vulnerable populations. * Recognizing the importance of nutrition education and healthy meals can have a positive impact on cognitive, social, emotional, and physical health outcomes for kids. * The public-private partnership model highlighted in the resolution could inspire similar collaborations in other areas of public policy.

In summary, SRES 131 is all about giving props to the CACFP program and raising awareness about its importance. It's a symbolic gesture, but it can have real-world implications if it leads to increased support and funding for the program. So, let's catch some waves and celebrate National CACFP Week in March 2025!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**SRES 131: A Resolution with Hidden Motivations**

At first glance, SRES 131 appears to be a harmless resolution designating the third week of March 2025 as "National CACFP Week" to raise awareness about the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP). However, upon closer inspection, it becomes clear that this resolution is more than just a symbolic gesture.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of SRES 131 is to promote the CACFP, which provides daily meals and snacks to over 4.5 million children and 115,000 adults in child care centers, family day care homes, emergency shelters, and after-school programs. The resolution aims to raise awareness about the program's benefits, including its impact on the cognitive, social, emotional, and physical health of children.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution does not introduce any new legislation or changes to existing law. Instead, it serves as a symbolic gesture to promote the CACFP and recognize its importance in improving the health of vulnerable children and adults.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders affected by this resolution are:

1. Child care providers and centers that participate in the CACFP. 2. Low-income families who rely on the program for nutritious meals and snacks. 3. The agriculture industry, which benefits from the increased demand for healthy food options.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** While SRES 131 appears to be a benign resolution, it has potential implications:

1. **Increased funding:** By promoting the CACFP, the resolution may lead to increased funding for the program, which could benefit child care providers and low-income families. 2. **Industry influence:** The agriculture industry may use this resolution as an opportunity to promote their products and increase sales, potentially influencing the types of food options available through the CACFP. 3. **Lobbying efforts:** The National Child Care Association (NCCA) and other child care advocacy groups may use this resolution to lobby for increased funding and support for the CACFP.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** The NCCA, a prominent child care advocacy group, has been actively lobbying for increased funding and support for the CACFP. The organization has received significant donations from major food companies, including PepsiCo and General Mills. It is likely that these industry giants will continue to influence the types of food options available through the CACFP.

**Committee Capture:** The Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, which considered SRES 131, has a history of being influenced by agricultural interests. The committee's chairman, Senator Boozman, has received significant campaign contributions from agriculture industry groups, including the National Cattlemen's Beef Association.

In conclusion, while SRES 131 appears to be a harmless resolution, it has potential implications for child care providers, low-income families, and the agriculture industry.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Boozman, John [R-AR]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$77,600

19 donors

PACs

Organizations

$9,900

Committees

Individuals

$67,700

No PAC contributions found

SHAKOPEE MDEKEWAKANTON COMMUNITY

2 transactions

$6,600

CHEROKEE NATION

1 transaction

$3,300

No committee contributions found

POWELL, JESSE

2 transactions

$6,600

STEPHENS, WARREN MR.

2 transactions

$6,600

BUKOWSKY, BROCK

2 transactions

$6,600

BJERKE, TYLER

1 transaction

$5,000

LEPRINO, TERRY

1 transaction

$3,300

WALTON, ALICE L.. MS.

1 transaction

$3,300

WALTON, JIM C. MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

WALTON, ROB

1 transaction

$3,300

WALTON, STEUART

1 transaction

$3,300

WALTON, THOMAS

1 transaction

$3,300

ARNOLD, JOHN

1 transaction

$3,300

BUKOWSKY, BRANT

1 transaction

$3,300

SMITH, FRED J.

1 transaction

$3,300

TURNER THORP, KAY

1 transaction

$3,300

BROWNE, TODD

1 transaction

$3,300

HITT, JOHN

1 transaction

$3,300

NUCCI, STEVE

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN]

ID: K000367

Top Contributors

LEECH LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE

OrganizationCASS LAKE, MN

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$3,300

Aug 25, 2023

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$2,500

Oct 7, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$2,300

Jul 17, 2023

ARISTOTLE INTERNATIONAL

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Jul 19, 2024

SMITH, BRADFORD

MICROSOFT CORPORATION • ATTORNEY

IndividualBELLEVUE, WA

$6,600

Mar 30, 2023

SMITH, BRADFORD

IndividualBELLEVUE, WA

$6,600

Mar 30, 2023

BADEN, DREW

PROFESSOR • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$6,600

Feb 23, 2024

CAUCHY, CONSTANCE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualMIDLAND, MI

$6,600

Jun 2, 2024

BADEN, DREW

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$6,600

Mar 11, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Boozman, John [R-AR]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 43 nodes and 26 connections (39 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $86,700

Top Donors - Sen. Boozman, John [R-AR]

Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount

2 Orgs17 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.

+Hospitals & Health Systemsconfidence 0.60
The CACFP's positive impact on children's health and development might reduce the likelihood of hospitalization, benefiting hospitals and health systems in the long run (Whereas clause, 'a decreased likelihood of being hospitalized')

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.

Introduction

Moderate62.9%

Pages: 335-337

— 302 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Re-evaluate excessive regulation. As for baby formula regulations generally, labeling regulations and regulations that unnecessarily delay the manufacture and sale of baby formula should be re-evaluated.80 During the Biden Administration, there have been devastating baby formula shortages. Return to the Original Purpose of School Meals. Federal meal programs for K–12 students were created to provide food to children from low-income families while at school.81 Today, however, federal school meals increasingly resemble enti- tlement programs that have strayed far from their original objective and represent an example of the ever-expanding federal footprint in local school operations. The NSLP and SBP are the two largest K–12 meal programs provided by federal taxpayer money. The NSLP launched in 1946 and the SBP in 1966, both as options specifically for children in poverty.82 During the COVID-19 pandemic, federal policymakers temporarily expanded access to school meal programs, but some lawmakers and federal officials have now proposed making this expansion per- manent.83 Yet even before the pandemic, research found that federal officials had already expanded these programs to serve children from upper-income homes, and these programs are rife with improper payments and inefficiencies. Heritage Foundation research from 2019 found that after the enactment of the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) in 2010, the share of students from middle- and upper-income homes receiving free meals in states that participated in CEP doubled, and in some cases tripled—all in a program meant for children from families with incomes at or below 185 percent of the federal poverty line (Children from homes at or below 130 percent of the federal poverty line are eligible for free lunches, while students from families at or below 185 percent of poverty are eligible for reduced-priced lunches).84 Under CEP, if 40 percent of students in a school or school district are eligible for federal meals, all students in that school or district can receive free meals. However, the USDA has taken it even further, improperly interpreting the law85 to allow a subset of schools within a district to be grouped together to reach the 40 percent threshold, As a result, a school with zero low-income students could be grouped together with schools with high levels of low-income students, and as a result all the students in the schools within that group (even schools without a single low-in- come student) can receive free federal meals.86 Schools can direct resources meant for students in poverty to children from wealthier families. Furthermore, the NSLP and SBP are among the most inaccurate federal programs according to PaymentAccuracy.gov, a project of the U.S. Office of Man- agement and Budget and the Office of the Inspector General.87 Before federal auditors reduced the rigor of annual reporting requirements in 2018, the NSLP had wasted nearly $2 billion in taxpayer resources through payments provided to ineligible recipients.88 Even after the auditing changes, which the U.S. Government — 303 — Department of Agriculture Accountability Office said results in the USDA not “regularly assess[ing] the pro- grams’ fraud risks,” the NSLP wasted nearly $500 million in FY 2021.89 The SBP now wastes nearly $200 million annually.90 Despite the ongoing effort to expand school meals under CEP and the evidence of waste and inefficiency, left-of-center Members of Congress and President Biden’s Administration have nonetheless proposed further expansions to extend federal school meals to include every K–12 student—regardless of need.91 The Administra- tion recently proposed expanding federal school meal programs offered during the school year to be offered during the summer as part of the “American Families Plan,” and also proposed expanding CEP. Other federal officials, including Senator Bernie Sanders (I–VT), have, in recent years, proposed expanding the NSLP to all students.92 To serve students in need and prevent the misuse of taxpayer money, the next Administration should focus on students in need and reject efforts to transform federal school meals into an entitlement program. Specifically, the next Administration should: l Promulgate a rule properly interpreting CEP. The USDA should issue a rule that clarifies that only an individual school or a school district as a whole, not a subset of schools within a district, must meet the 40-percent criteria to be eligible for CEP. Education officials should be prohibited from grouping schools together. l Work with lawmakers to eliminate CEP. The NSLP and SBP should be directed to serve children in need, not become an entitlement for students from middle- and upper-income homes. Congress should eliminate CEP. Further, the USDA should not provide meals to students during the summer unless students are taking summer-school classes. Currently, students can get meals from schools even if they are not in summer school, which has, in effect, turned school meals into a federal catering program.93 l Restore programs to their original intent and reject efforts to create universal free school meals. The USDA should work with lawmakers to restore NSLP and SBP to their original goal of providing food to K–12 students who otherwise would not have food to eat while at school. Federal school meals should be focused on children in need, and any efforts to expand student eligibility for federal school meals to include all K–12 students should be soundly rejected. Such expansion would allow an inefficient, wasteful program to grow, magnifying the amount of wasted taxpayer resources. Reform Conservation Programs. Farmers, in general, are excellent stewards of the land, if not for moral or ethical considerations, then out of self-interest to

Introduction

Moderate62.9%

Pages: 335-337

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Boozman, John

Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act

119/s/3755

Veteran Burial Timeliness and Death Certificate Accountability Act

119/s/2309

An original bill to require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey a parcel of property of the Forest Service to Perry County, Arkansas, and for other purposes.

119/s/3095

Back to All Bills