A resolution supporting the observation of National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month during the period beginning on January 1, 2025, and ending on February 1, 2025, to raise awareness of, and opposition to, human trafficking and modern slavery.

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/sres/39

Last Updated: February 12, 2026

A resolution supporting the observation of National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month during the period beginning on January 1, 2025, and ending on February 1, 2025, to raise awareness of, and opposition to, human trafficking and modern slavery.

SRES. 39, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$82,472 raised

23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

70% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Health and Human Services" section, p. 533-535 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S387-388; text: CR S397-398)

January 26, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

📍 Current Status

Next: The full Senate will vote on whether to pass the bill.

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Analysis of SRES 39: A Resolution Supporting National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect the implications of this resolution on my empire's interests.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This resolution aims to raise awareness about human trafficking and modern slavery during January-February 2025. It's a symbolic gesture, devoid of concrete policy changes or regulatory teeth. The primary objective is to demonstrate congressional concern for the issue, rather than driving meaningful reform.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** None. This resolution doesn't introduce new legislation or modify existing laws related to human trafficking and modern slavery. It's a feel-good measure, lacking substance.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

* **Businesses:** Unaffected, as there are no regulatory changes or compliance requirements. * **Victims of Human Trafficking:** Theoretically, this resolution might raise awareness about their plight, but it doesn't provide tangible support or resources. * **Government Agencies:** No significant impact on law enforcement, social services, or other government agencies.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This resolution is a non-event for my business interests. It won't affect our supply chains, operations, or bottom line. However, I'll keep an eye on potential future legislation that might arise from this awareness campaign. If new regulations are proposed, we'll be prepared to lobby and shape the narrative to protect our interests.

In conclusion, SRES 39 is a symbolic gesture with no concrete impact on my empire's wealth, influence, or control. It's a reminder that, in the world of politics, appearances often matter more than substance. As a visionary leader, I'll continue to monitor developments and adapt my strategy to ensure our interests remain protected and advanced.

**Recommendation:** Monitor future legislative proposals related to human trafficking and modern slavery. Prepare to engage with lawmakers and regulatory bodies to shape policy in a way that benefits our business interests.

**Projection:** This resolution will have zero impact on our projected revenue growth of $10 billion over the next 5 years.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a resolution is a type of legislative proposal that expresses the opinion or sentiment of Congress on a particular issue.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The main purpose of SRES 39 is to support the observation of National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month from January 1 to February 1, 2025. The objective is to raise awareness about human trafficking and modern slavery, as well as to express opposition to these crimes.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

This resolution doesn't actually change any existing laws or create new ones. Instead, it's a symbolic gesture that aims to bring attention to the issue of human trafficking and modern slavery. It does, however, acknowledge various laws already in place to combat human trafficking, such as the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The affected parties include victims of human trafficking, particularly children and youths experiencing homelessness, LGBTQ youth, American Indian, Alaska Native, and Pacific Islander women and girls. The stakeholders involved are various government agencies, including the Department of Justice, Department of State, and Administration for Native Americans, as well as organizations working to combat human trafficking.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The potential impact of this resolution is limited, as it doesn't introduce any new legislation or policies. However, by raising awareness about human trafficking and modern slavery, it may encourage more people to take action against these crimes. The implications are that the government and society as a whole need to be more proactive in combating human trafficking and supporting its victims.

As we covered in 8th grade civics class, Congress has the power to declare national observances and awareness months. This resolution is an example of how Congress can use this power to bring attention to important issues. However, it's disappointing that such a basic measure needs to be taken, as human trafficking and modern slavery should already be widely recognized as serious problems.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go grade papers on the basics of the legislative process...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round and listen closely, for I have uncovered the hidden agenda behind SRES 39, a seemingly innocuous resolution supporting National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month. But don't be fooled – there's more to this bill than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** On the surface, this resolution aims to raise awareness about human trafficking and modern slavery, which is a noble cause indeed. However, I believe it's just a smokescreen for something more sinister. The real objective is to further entrench the government's control over our lives, using the guise of protecting vulnerable populations.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution doesn't explicitly change any existing laws, but it does lay the groundwork for future legislation that could expand the government's authority in this area. Pay attention to Section 2, which mentions "a whole-of-government effort" to combat human trafficking. This is code for increased surveillance and data collection on citizens, all under the guise of protecting victims.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The resolution claims to support victims of human trafficking, but I believe it's actually targeting specific groups, such as LGBTQ youth, American Indian women, and homeless individuals. These groups will be subject to increased scrutiny and potential exploitation by government agencies and NGOs.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This resolution is just the tip of the iceberg. It sets the stage for a broader agenda that could lead to:

1. Increased surveillance and data collection on citizens, particularly vulnerable populations. 2. Expanded authority for law enforcement agencies to investigate and prosecute individuals suspected of human trafficking. 3. Greater control over global supply chains, allowing the government to dictate how businesses operate and who they can hire. 4. More funding for NGOs and government agencies that claim to combat human trafficking, but may actually be perpetuating it.

Wake up, sheeple! This resolution is not what it seems. It's a Trojan horse for increased government control and surveillance. We must remain vigilant and question the true intentions behind this seemingly benevolent legislation.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round! We've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here. SRES 39, the "National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month" resolution. (Sarcastic tone) Oh boy, I can already feel the freedom-loving patriots in this great nation of ours just quivering with excitement.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is all about raising awareness for human trafficking and modern slavery. Because, you know, those are things we're totally not aware of already. (Wink) The resolution aims to "support the observation" of National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month from January 1st to February 1st, 2025. Wow, what a bold move! I mean, who wouldn't want to dedicate an entire month to... awareness?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Well, this is where things get really interesting. The bill doesn't actually change any existing laws or create new ones. It's more of a "resolution" – you know, like a New Year's resolution, but without the actual commitment to doing anything meaningful. (Chuckle) It just reaffirms our nation's commitment to combating human trafficking and modern slavery. Because, clearly, we weren't already committed to that.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Oh boy, this is where the elites come in! (Smirk) The bill mentions all sorts of stakeholders, from law enforcement agencies to victim service providers, and even businesses with global supply chains. You know, because those are the real heroes fighting against human trafficking – not the actual victims or their families.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, this is where things get really juicy! (Sarcastic tone) By dedicating an entire month to awareness, we can expect a significant decrease in human trafficking and modern slavery. I mean, it's not like these complex issues require actual policy changes or concrete actions. Nope, just some good ol' fashioned awareness-raising will do the trick!

But seriously, folks, this bill is more of a symbolic gesture than an actual attempt to address the issue. It's a feel-good measure that allows our elected officials to pat themselves on the back and say, "Hey, we care about human trafficking!" without actually doing anything meaningful.

And that's the real tragedy here – not the fact that human trafficking exists (although that's certainly a tragedy), but the fact that our politicians are more interested in grandstanding than actual problem-solving. But hey, at least we'll have a whole month to raise awareness... about how much we care about raising awareness!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another meaningless resolution from the esteemed members of Congress, designed to make them feel good about themselves while accomplishing nothing. SRES 39 is a prime example of legislative theater, a shallow attempt to address human trafficking and modern slavery.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to declare January 1-February 1 as National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month. Wow, what a bold move! By doing so, Congress hopes to "raise awareness" of this issue. Because, clearly, the problem is that people are just not aware enough about human trafficking.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** There are no actual provisions or changes to existing law in this resolution. It's simply a feel-good declaration with a bunch of "whereas" clauses that reiterate obvious facts about human trafficking. The bill doesn't even propose any concrete actions or policies to address the issue.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include victims of human trafficking, who will likely see no tangible benefits from this resolution. Other stakeholders include politicians looking for a PR boost and special interest groups that can use this resolution as a talking point.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Zero. Zilch. Nada. This resolution will not lead to any meaningful changes in policy or law enforcement practices. It won't provide additional resources or support for victims of human trafficking. It's just a hollow gesture designed to make politicians look like they care.

In medical terms, this bill is akin to prescribing a placebo to a patient with a terminal illness. It might make the patient feel better temporarily, but it won't address the underlying disease. In this case, the disease is the systemic failure of our government to effectively combat human trafficking and modern slavery.

To diagnose the real illness beneath this legislative theater, we need to look at the motivations behind SRES 39. Is it a genuine attempt to address human trafficking, or is it just a way for politicians to score points with their constituents? The answer is obvious: it's a cynical ploy to appear concerned about an important issue without actually doing anything meaningful.

In conclusion, SRES 39 is a waste of time and resources. It's a classic example of how our government prioritizes appearances over actual results. If Congress truly cared about addressing human trafficking and modern slavery, they would propose concrete legislation with teeth, not empty resolutions designed to make them look good.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Bill Summary: SRES 39**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** SRES 39 is a resolution that aims to raise awareness about human trafficking and modern slavery by supporting the observation of National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month from January 1, 2025, to February 1, 2025. The resolution seeks to educate the public about the issue, promote opposition to human trafficking, and encourage efforts to prevent it.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution does not propose any changes to existing law but rather serves as a statement of support for raising awareness about human trafficking and modern slavery. It highlights various statistics and facts about human trafficking, including the estimated 50 million victims worldwide and the $150 billion annual revenue generated by forced labor and human trafficking.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* Victims of human trafficking and modern slavery * Governments (Federal, State, Tribal, and local) * Businesses and industries with global supply chains * Organizations working to combat human trafficking * LGBTQ youth, American Indian, Alaska Native, and Pacific Islander women and girls, who are disproportionately affected by human trafficking

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The resolution's potential impact is largely symbolic, as it does not propose any concrete policy changes. However, by raising awareness about human trafficking and modern slavery, the resolution may:

* Encourage increased reporting of suspected cases * Promote education and training for law enforcement agencies and victim service providers * Support efforts to prevent human trafficking and protect victims * Foster a unified response among governments, organizations, and stakeholders to combat human trafficking

Overall, SRES 39 serves as a call to action to raise awareness about the issue of human trafficking and modern slavery, with the ultimate goal of preventing these crimes and protecting victims.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this congressional bill, SRES 39, and get into the nitty-gritty of what it's all about.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

This resolution is all about raising awareness and opposition to human trafficking and modern slavery. It's like, we're talkin' about some heavy stuff here, bro. The main goal is to observe National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month from January 1 to February 1, 2025. It's a call to action, man – to educate people, raise awareness, and get everyone on board to combat this horrific issue.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

This resolution doesn't exactly change existing law, but it's more like a statement of intent, you know? It's a declaration that the US is committed to eliminating human trafficking and modern slavery. There are some key points, though:

* It acknowledges the scope of the problem: 50 million victims worldwide, $150 billion in annual revenues from forced labor and human trafficking. * It highlights vulnerable populations: children, youths experiencing homelessness, LGBTQ youth, American Indian, Alaska Native, and Pacific Islander women and girls. * It emphasizes the need for a whole-of-government effort to combat human trafficking, including education, prevention, identification, and prosecution.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This resolution affects pretty much everyone, bro. We're talkin' about:

* Victims of human trafficking: they deserve our support, protection, and services to help them recover. * Businesses: they need to be aware of the risks of forced labor and child labor in their supply chains. * Governments: federal, state, tribal, and local governments all have a role to play in combating human trafficking. * Civil society: we're talkin' about organizations, advocacy groups, and individuals who care about this issue.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This resolution is like a ripple effect, man. It's got the potential to:

* Raise awareness and educate people about the realities of human trafficking and modern slavery. * Inspire action from governments, businesses, and civil society to combat this issue. * Support victims and survivors by providing them with services and protection. * Hold perpetrators accountable for their crimes.

It's not just a resolution, bro – it's a call to action. We need to take this seriously and work together to eliminate human trafficking and modern slavery.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**SRES 39: A Resolution Supporting National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of SRES 39 is to raise awareness about human trafficking and modern slavery, particularly during the period from January 1, 2025, to February 1, 2025. The resolution aims to promote opposition to these crimes, support victims, and encourage efforts to prevent and combat human trafficking.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution does not propose any changes to existing law but rather serves as a statement of intent, acknowledging the severity of human trafficking and modern slavery. It highlights various statistics, risk factors, and vulnerabilities associated with these crimes, emphasizing the need for continued efforts to combat them.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **Victims of Human Trafficking:** The resolution acknowledges the trauma and exploitation faced by victims, emphasizing the importance of a trauma-informed approach in providing support services. 2. **Federal, State, Tribal, and Local Governments:** The resolution calls for a unified response among governments to combat human trafficking, including prevention, identification, stabilization, investigation, and prosecution efforts. 3. **Businesses and Supply Chains:** Although not directly addressed, the resolution's mention of forced labor in global supply chains may have implications for companies operating internationally.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Increased Awareness:** By designating a specific period for awareness-raising activities, SRES 39 aims to educate the public about human trafficking and modern slavery. 2. **Legislative Momentum:** The resolution's passage could create momentum for future legislation addressing human trafficking and modern slavery, potentially leading to more comprehensive reforms. 3. **Stakeholder Engagement:** The resolution's emphasis on a whole-of-government approach may encourage greater collaboration among government agencies, NGOs, and private sector entities in combating human trafficking.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** While SRES 39 does not have direct financial implications, it is worth noting that the Polaris Project, a prominent anti-human trafficking organization, has been a vocal advocate for increased awareness and action on this issue. The Polaris Project has received funding from various sources, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Ford Foundation, and the U.S. Department of State.

**Committee Capture:** The resolution was introduced by Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA), who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee. Given the committee's jurisdiction over human trafficking issues, it is likely that the committee will continue to play a key role in shaping future legislation on this topic.

In conclusion, SRES 39 serves as a symbolic statement of intent, highlighting the need for continued efforts to combat human trafficking and modern slavery. While its impact may be limited, the resolution's passage could contribute to increased awareness and momentum for future legislative action on this critical issue.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$130,307

63 donors

PACs

Organizations

Committees

$3,000

Individuals

$127,307

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA

1 transaction

$2,000

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

1 transaction

$1,000

KUMAR, SHALLI

2 transactions

$9,900

SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE

2 transactions

$9,900

SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN

2 transactions

$9,900

ARVIG, ALLEN

3 transactions

$6,710

STARRETT, RONALD

2 transactions

$5,800

COLLINS, RICHARD

1 transaction

$5,523

MALONE, KIP

6 transactions

$4,520

DETERMAN, MARK

1 transaction

$3,300

MCKEE, JACK C

1 transaction

$3,300

WEISS, LUKE

1 transaction

$3,300

PECK JR, JOHN

1 transaction

$2,900

LEIGH, JOHN

4 transactions

$2,715

COLLINS, III, HENRY L.

1 transaction

$2,601

POSNER, IDA MOLLOY

1 transaction

$2,500

VANDERHAAG, JOHN

3 transactions

$2,500

DIMARE, SCOTT

3 transactions

$1,500

RADY, PAUL

2 transactions

$1,500

VANDER HAAG, JOHN C

1 transaction

$1,500

RICHARDS, MARY

2 transactions

$1,435

NWANERI, MATTHEW

1 transaction

$1,200

FRENCH, ARTHUR

1 transaction

$1,000

JUCKETTE, LINDA

1 transaction

$1,000

KOROLOGOS, TOM C

1 transaction

$1,000

LARSON, ELLEN T

1 transaction

$1,000

MANATOS, ANDREW E

1 transaction

$1,000

MERCHANT, AHMED

1 transaction

$1,000

PATRICK, CHRIS MR..

1 transaction

$1,000

ROGERS, DIRKSEN

1 transaction

$1,000

SABIN, DANIEL

2 transactions

$1,000

SCUDDER, JACK

1 transaction

$1,000

SMITH, JAMES A

1 transaction

$1,000

SMITH, THOMAS STUART MR..

1 transaction

$1,000

VANDERPOOL, MARYLEE

1 transaction

$1,000

JOHNS, SUSAN

1 transaction

$990

PHELPS, DICK

1 transaction

$910

HESS, CURTIS

1 transaction

$750

LUO, KERRI

1 transaction

$750

WILLIAMS, ANGELA

1 transaction

$630

AXMEAR, FRED

1 transaction

$500

FRANKEN, KEN

1 transaction

$500

HARKEN, MARY J

1 transaction

$500

HASKENHOFF, TINA

1 transaction

$500

HILL, VERNON

1 transaction

$500

HUSSAIN, SULEMAN

1 transaction

$500

JOHNSON, WAYNE

1 transaction

$500

KOESTNER, RICHARD

1 transaction

$500

LILLIS, TERRY

1 transaction

$500

MCKEON, PATRICIA

1 transaction

$500

MCMICKLE, JOHN

1 transaction

$500

MOGLER, DEVIN

1 transaction

$500

PECK, JOHN

1 transaction

$500

RITTS, SUSAN BUTLER

1 transaction

$500

SUTTER, THEODORE

1 transaction

$500

VANDER HAAG, RUTH

1 transaction

$500

VANKERCKHOVE, BRUCE

1 transaction

$500

VIGO, JUDITH

1 transaction

$500

WHITCOMB, STANLEY

1 transaction

$500

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 8 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV]

ID: C001113

Top Contributors

LAS VEGAS PAIUTE TRIBE

OrganizationLAS VEGAS, NV

$3,300

Nov 28, 2023

MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$2,500

Dec 20, 2023

ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE

OrganizationLIVINGSTON, TX

$1,500

Oct 2, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Apr 26, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jul 11, 2023

MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION

OrganizationOKMULGEE, OK

$1,000

Sep 18, 2024

MOHEGAN TRIBE OF INDIANS OF CONNECTICUT

OrganizationUNCASVILLE, CT

$1,000

Aug 12, 2024

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$550

Oct 2, 2023

LONGTIN, LUANN

IndividualPOTOMAC, MD

$17,325

Jun 30, 2024

SLIFKA, ROSALYN

IndividualWALTHAM, MA

$5,800

Jun 30, 2024

Sen. Collins, Susan M. [R-ME]

ID: C001035

Top Contributors

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

PACPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jun 28, 2023

SILBEY, ALEXANDER

ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC, • CONSULTANT

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$6,600

Jul 23, 2024

ARNOLD, LAURA

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$6,600

Aug 10, 2024

READ, KURT

RSF PARTNERS • PARTNER

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

COATES, CHRIS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualIRVING, TX

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

READ, KURT

RSF PARTNERS • PARTNER

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

CROTTY, THOMAS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

COATES, CHRIS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualIRVING, TX

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

CROTTY, THOMAS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

YOUNGMAN, ANDREW

CITIZENS DISABILITY LLC • CEO

IndividualWEST NEWTON, MA

$3,300

Nov 20, 2023

Sen. Murkowski, Lisa [R-AK]

ID: M001153

Top Contributors

MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationAUBURN, WA

$3,300

May 15, 2023

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$2,500

Dec 20, 2023

MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationAUBURN, WA

$1,000

Nov 20, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Oct 26, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jun 3, 2024

PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS

OrganizationTACOMA, WA

$1,000

Sep 30, 2024

SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationSUQUAMISH, WA

$1,000

Sep 30, 2024

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION

OrganizationSELLS, AZ

$1,000

Aug 9, 2024

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$550

Oct 26, 2023

SEGAL, PAUL

LS POWER DEVELOPMENT, LLC • CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Dec 16, 2023

Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR]

ID: W000779

Top Contributors

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$2,000

Dec 12, 2024

MOHEGAN TRIBE OF INDIANS OF CONNECTICUT

OrganizationUNCASVILLE, CT

$1,000

Dec 28, 2023

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$1,000

Dec 30, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSIONS INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$1,000

Mar 26, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDWEKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jun 12, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDWEKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

May 31, 2023

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$1,000

Dec 31, 2023

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$550

Oct 3, 2023

RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY

OrganizationRENO, NV

$500

Jul 18, 2023

RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY

OrganizationRENO, NV

$500

Sep 10, 2024

Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL]

ID: D000563

Top Contributors

MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationMIAMI, OK

$1,700

Mar 29, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

May 17, 2024

MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationMIAMI, OK

$800

Mar 29, 2024

KUJAWSKI, JOHN

SELF-EMPLOYED • ATTORNEY

IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO

$5,000

May 28, 2024

KUJAWSKI, JOHN

IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO

$5,000

Jun 4, 2024

KUJAWSKI, JOHN

SELF-EMPLOYED • ATTORNEY

IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO

$3,600

May 29, 2024

KUJAWSKI, JOHN

IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO

$3,600

Jun 4, 2024

BARKER, MARA MILLS

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$3,300

Dec 26, 2024

BARKER, MARA MILLS

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$3,300

Dec 26, 2024

CHOWDHURY, SHUVRO

BOWERY ENGINE • ENGINEER

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Nov 1, 2024

Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN]

ID: K000367

Top Contributors

LEECH LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE

OrganizationCASS LAKE, MN

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$3,300

Aug 25, 2023

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$2,500

Oct 7, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$2,300

Jul 17, 2023

ARISTOTLE INTERNATIONAL

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Jul 19, 2024

SMITH, BRADFORD

MICROSOFT CORPORATION • ATTORNEY

IndividualBELLEVUE, WA

$6,600

Mar 30, 2023

SMITH, BRADFORD

IndividualBELLEVUE, WA

$6,600

Mar 30, 2023

BADEN, DREW

PROFESSOR • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$6,600

Feb 23, 2024

CAUCHY, CONSTANCE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualMIDLAND, MI

$6,600

Jun 2, 2024

BADEN, DREW

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$6,600

Mar 11, 2024

Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]

ID: B001277

Top Contributors

OLSON, LYNDON

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualWACO, TX

$3,300

Dec 20, 2024

ALIX, JAY

ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$3,300

Oct 2, 2023

KIM, CHRISTINE M.

BBB LLC • ATTORNEY

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Oct 31, 2023

ALIX, JAY

ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$3,300

Apr 15, 2024

ROURE, RITA

PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$3,300

Apr 10, 2024

ROURE, RITA

PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$3,300

Apr 10, 2024

CHAVEZ, TOM

KRUX INC. • CEO

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Jul 13, 2024

CHAVEZ, TOM

KRUX INC. • CEO

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Jul 13, 2024

JONES, JERRY C.

LIVERAMP INC. • EXECUTIVE

IndividualLITTLE ROCK, AR

$3,300

Sep 19, 2024

NESSEL, ARIEL

NESSEL DEVELOPMENT • OWNER

IndividualROSS, CA

$3,300

Jul 12, 2024

Sen. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV]

ID: C001047

Top Contributors

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$2,800

Dec 31, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Nov 8, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jul 22, 2024

ARNOLD, JOHN MR.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$6,600

Dec 27, 2023

MANOCHERIAN, JENNIFER MS.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSCARSDALE, NY

$6,600

Feb 17, 2023

MANOCHERIAN, JED MR.

SELF • REAL ESTATE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Feb 23, 2023

MANOCHERIAN, GREG MR.

SELF EMPLOYED • REAL ESTATE

IndividualPOUND RIDGE, NY

$6,600

Mar 1, 2023

MANOCHERIAN, KIM

PANAM EQUITIES • EXECUTIVE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Mar 27, 2023

KAY, ALISON MS.

KIDS CAPITAL • HEDGE FUND MANAGER

IndividualBEVERLY HILLS, CA

$6,600

Jun 20, 2023

MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE

DMM PROPRIETA MANAGEMENT • MANAGER

IndividualASPEN, CO

$6,600

Sep 26, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 58 nodes and 38 connections (59 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $118,272

Top Donors - Sen. Grassley, Chuck [R-IA]

Showing top 15 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC2 Committees12 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Health and Human Services

Moderate

Vector: 58%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"SRES 39 focuses on raising awareness about human trafficking and modern slavery, which aligns with Project 2025's inclusion of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022 (S. 3949) under HHS-related policies. Both emphasize combating human trafficking, though the bill is symbolic while Project 2025 includes legislative and regulatory actions."

Key themes:human trafficking awarenessvictim protectionTrafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Department of Homeland Security

Moderate

Vector: 56%

Pages: 180-182AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 DHS section address human trafficking and related border security concerns, particularly regarding unaccompanied minors and smuggling, but the bill is purely symbolic awareness while Project 2025 proposes concrete enforcement and policy changes."

Key themes:human traffickingunaccompanied minorsborder securityasylum reform

— 147 — Department of Homeland Security Personnel USCIS should be classified as a national security–sensitive agency, and all of its employees should be classified as holding national security–sensitive posi- tions. Leaks must be investigated and punished as they would be in a national security agency, and the union should be decertified. Any employees who cannot accept that change and cannot conform their behavior to the standards required by such an agency should be separated. USCIS’s D.C. personnel presence should be skeletal, and agency employees with operational or security roles should be rotated out to offices throughout the United States. These USCIS employees should live and work in the communities that are most affected by their daily duties and decisions. NECESSARY BORDER AND IMMIGRATION STATUTORY, REGULATORY, AND ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES The current border security crisis was made possible by glaring loopholes in our immigration system. The result was a preventable and predictable his- toric increase in illegal and inadmissible encounters along our southern border. This pulled limited resources from the front lines of our nation’s borders and away from their national security mission, releasing a vast and complex set of threats into our country. To regain our sovereignty, integrity, and security, Congress must pass meaningful legislation to close the current loopholes and prevent future Administrations from exploiting them for political gain or per- sonal ideology. Legislative Proposals l Title 42 authority in Title 8. Create an authority akin to the Title 42 Public Health authority that has been used during the COVID-19 pandemic to expel illegal aliens across the border immediately when certain non- health conditions are met, such as loss of operational control of the border. l Mandatory appropriation for border wall system infrastructure. The monies appropriated would be used to fund the construction of additional border wall systems, technology, and personnel in strategic locations in accordance with the Border Security Improvement Plan (BSIP). l Appropriation for Port of Entry infrastructure. Border security is not addressed solely by systems in between the ports of entry. POEs require technology and physical upgrades as well as an influx of personnel to meet capacity demands and act as the literal gatekeepers for the country. This is the first line of defense against drug and human smuggling operations. — 148 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Unaccompanied minors 1. Congress should repeal Section 235 of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (TVPRA),9 which provides numerous immigration benefits to unaccompanied alien children and only encourages more parents to send their children across the border illegally and unaccompanied. These children too often become trafficking victims, which means that the TVPRA has failed. 2. If an alternative to repealing Section 235 of the TVPRA is necessary, the section should be amended so that all unaccompanied children, regardless of nationality, may be returned to their home countries in a safe and efficient manner. Currently, the TVPRA allows only children from contiguous countries (Canada and Mexico) to be returned while every other unaccompanied minor must be placed into a lengthy process that usually results in the minor’s landing in the custody of an illegal alien family member. 3. Congress must end the Flores Settlement Agreement by explicitly setting nationwide terms and standards for family and unaccompanied detention and housing. Such standards should focus on meeting human needs and should allow for large-scale use of temporary facilities (for example, tents). 4. Congress should amend the Homeland Security Act and portions of the TVPRA to move detention of alien children expressly from the Department of Health and Human Services to DHS. l Asylum reform 1. The standard for a credible fear of persecution should be raised and aligned to the standard for asylum. It should also account specifically for credibility determinations that are a key element of the asylum claim. 2. Codify former asylum bars and third-country transit rules. 3. Congress should eliminate the particular social group protected ground as vague and overbroad or, in the alternative, provide a clear definition with parameters that at a minimum codify the holding in Matter of A-B- that gang violence and domestic violence are not grounds for asylum.10

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 57%

Pages: 509-511AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"SRES 39 focuses on raising awareness about human trafficking and modern slavery, while the Project 2025 policy excerpt centers on teen pregnancy prevention, adoption reform, refugee resettlement, and child support enforcement—topics that are only tangentially related through broader child welfare concerns."

Key themes:child welfareprotection of minorshuman services

— 477 — Department of Health and Human Services Teen Pregnancy Prevention (TPP) and Personal Responsibility Educa- tion Program (PREP). TPP is operated by the Office of Population Affairs in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health; PREP is operated by the ACF Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation. Both programs should ensure that there is better reporting of subgrantees and referral lists so that they do not promote abortion or high-risk sexual behavior among adolescents. CMS should ensure that Sexual Risk Avoidance (SRA) proponents receive these grants and are given every opportunity to prove their effectiveness. SRA programs, both at ACF and at OASH and both discretionary and mandatory, should be equal in funding and emphasis. Qualitative research should be conducted on both types of programs to ensure continuous improvement. In addition, certain provisions should be employed so that these programs do not serve as advocacy tools to promote sex, promote prostitution, or provide a funnel effect for abortion facilities and school field trips to clinics, or for similar purposes. Parent involvement and parent–child communication should be encour- aged and be a part of any funded project. Risk avoidance should be prioritized, and any program that submits a proposal that promotes risk rather than health should not be eligible for funding. Site visits should be revamped to ensure adherence to these optimal health met- rics, and a cost analysis of programming as compared to students served should be a metric in funding (taking into account that in certain cases, intensive programs will serve fewer students and can have more positive results). These same param- eters should apply to sex education programs at ACF. Any lists with “approved curriculum” or so-called evidence-based lists should be abolished; HHS should not create a monopoly of curriculum, adding to the profit of certain publishers. Furthermore, lists created in the past have given priority to sex-promotion text- books. HHS should create a list of criteria for evaluating the sort of curriculum that should be selected for any sex education grant programs, both at OASH and at ACF, with the aim of promoting optimal health and adhering to the legislative language of each program. Adoption Reform. There are roughly 400,000 children across the nation on the waiting list for foster care and 100,000 awaiting adoptive families, and the opioid/ fentanyl crisis is putting more at risk every day. Unfortunately, many of the faith- based adoption agencies that serve these children are under threat from lawsuits, or else their licenses and contracts have been halted because they cannot in good conscience place children in every household due to their religious belief that a child should have a married mother and father. HHS, through ACF and the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources (ASFR), should repeal the unnecessary 2016 regulation61 that imposes nonstatutory sexual orientation and gender identity nondiscrimination conditions on agency grants and return to the policy of maximizing the options for placing vulnerable children — 478 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise in their forever homes. ACF and OCR should also survey their programs to consider whether additional waivers of HHS grant conditions—waivers the Biden Admin- istration revoked in 2021—are needed for faith-based agencies. Additionally, Congress should pass the Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act62 to ensure that providers and organizations cannot be subjected to discrimination for providing adoption and foster care services based on their beliefs about marriage. Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR). The Office of Refugee Resettlement should be moved to the Department of Homeland Security. Having health and welfare functions managed by HHS and border security functions managed by DHS has created intolerable failures in both. HHS and ORR have forgotten their original refugee-resettlement mission and instead have provided a panoply of free programs that incentivize people to come to the U.S. illegally. Even more troubling, ORR has too often placed children into dangerous situations when releasing them into the country. Nearly all of HHS’s care, custody, and placement of children is done through cooperative agreements with private agencies, many of which may have broken federal law by inducing or being accomplices in illegal immigration. Those arrangements could be handled far more effectively by DHS. Congress should reform the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act63 to transfer all ORR duties for unaccompanied alien children to DHS and eliminate the Flores settlement agreement.64 Regardless of where ORR’s functions reside, ORR staff and care providers should never be allowed to facilitate abortions for unaccompanied children in its cus- tody, including by transporting minors across state lines from pro-life states to abortion-friendly states. Pregnant, unaccompanied girls in ORR custody should be treated with dignity, not trafficked across state lines to be victimized by the abortion industry. ORR should withdraw its policy of allowing elective abortions for children in ORR care and issue a new policy of instructing care providers not to allow girls to be transported for elective abortions. HHS OGC and the White House should insist that DOJ fight to defend that policy up to the U.S. Supreme Court in light of Dobbs. Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) Congress established Aid to Families with Dependent Children in 1935 to assist single-parent families who were suffering financially from the loss of a bread-winning husband and father. Within two decades, however, the majority of families receiving aid were depen- dent because of paternal abandonment rather than death. Today, nearly a third of America’s children live without a father present in the home, and a fourth of them are enrolled to receive child support. The glaring issue in child support enforcement today is a non-resident father’s ability to provide full or consistent child support payments. The literature reflects this divide as fathers have been categorized as “deadbeat” dads, then as “deadbroke”

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 57%

Pages: 518-520AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on raising awareness of human trafficking, while the Project 2025 HHS section deals with reproductive health policies, gender-transition care restrictions, and childcare funding. Both touch on vulnerable populations (e.g., LGBTQ youth, women) but address unrelated policy goals, resulting only a weak thematic connection."

Key themes:LGBTQ populationswomen's healthvulnerable groups

— 485 — Department of Health and Human Services 2022, a federal court blocked this attempt to eliminate health insurance coverage for fertility awareness–based methods of family planning from requirements that cover at least 58 million women, and the judge made his ruling permanent in December 2022. HRSA should promulgate regulations consistent with this order. HHS should more thoroughly ensure that fertility awareness–based methods of family planning are part of women’s preventive services under the ACA. FABMs often involve costs for materials and supplies, and HHS should make clear that coverage of those items is also required. FABMs are highly effective and allow women to make family planning choices in a manner that meets their needs and reflects their values. l Eliminate men’s preventive services from the women’s preventive services mandate. In December 2021, HRSA updated its women’s preventive services guidelines to include male condoms after claiming for years that it had no authority to do so because Congress explicitly limited the mandate to “women’s” preventive care and screenings. HRSA should not incorporate exclusively male contraceptive methods into guidelines that specify they encompass only women’s services. l Eliminate the week-after-pill from the contraceptive mandate as a potential abortifacient. One of the emergency contraceptives covered under the HRSA preventive services guidelines is Ella (ulipristal acetate). Like its close cousin, the abortion pill mifepristone, Ella is a progesterone blocker and can prevent a recently fertilized embryo from implanting in a woman’s uterus. HRSA should eliminate this potential abortifacient from the contraceptive mandate. l Withdraw Ryan White guidance allowing funds to pay for cross-sex transition support. HRSA should withdraw all guidance encouraging Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program service providers to provide controversial “gender transition” procedures or “gender-affirming care,” which cause irreversible physical and mental harm to those who receive them. l Ensure that training for medical professionals (doctors, nurses, etc.) and doulas is not being used for abortion training. HHS should ensure that training programs for medical professionals—including doctors, nurses, and doulas—are in full compliance with restrictions on abortion funding and conscience-protection laws. In addition, HHS should: — 486 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Investigate state medical school compliance with the Coats–Snowe Amendment,71 which prohibits discrimination against health care entities that do not provide or undergo training for abortion. 2. Ensure that the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) complies with all relevant conscience statutes and regulations and that states have taken the affirmative steps (for example, by issuing regulations) to assure compliance with Coats–Snowe. 3. Communicate to medical schools that any abortion-related training must be on an opt-in rather than opt-out basis. 4. Require states that receive HHS funds to issue regulations or enter into arrangements with accrediting bodies to comply with the Coats–Snowe Amendment’s prohibition of mandatory abortion training by individuals or institutions. The Coats–Snowe Amendment specifically requires such state regulations or arrangements. l Prioritize funding for home-based childcare, not universal day care. As HRSA’s Early Childhood Health page outlines, “Currently, only about half of U.S. preschoolers are on-track with their development and ready for school. And more than one in four of children (28%) who experience abuse or neglect are under 3 years old.”72 Concurrently, children who spend significant time in day care experience higher rates of anxiety, depression, and neglect as well as poor educational and developmental outcomes. Instead of providing universal day care, funding should go to parents either to offset the cost of staying home with a child or to pay for familial, in-home childcare. l Provide education and resources on early childhood health. By partnering with new organizations like the Center on Child and Family Poverty, HRSA should provide resources and information on the importance of the mother–child relationship in child well-being. This should include relationship education curricula that equip mothers and caregivers to connect with and improve their understanding of their infants, toddlers, and young children. Maternal and Child Health. Currently, the HRSA Maternal and Child Health program is collecting data on the benefits of doulas in improving the health, safety, and emotional well-being of mothers at birth. Doulas provide a patient-focused, nonmedical support system for single or married mothers that “decreases the

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 56%

Pages: 491-493AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on raising awareness of human trafficking, while the Project 2025 excerpt centers on abortion pill regulations, vaccine importation, and NIH bioethics reforms; both touch on protecting women and girls but address distinct policy areas, resulting in only a tangential connection."

Key themes:women's healthprotection of vulnerable populationspublic awarenessHHS involvement

— 459 — Department of Health and Human Services pro-life states that are trying to protect women, girls, and unborn children from abortion. The FDA should therefore: l Reinstate earlier safety protocols for Mifeprex that were mostly eliminated in 2016 and apply these protocols to any generic version of mifepristone. A bare-minimum policy of limiting abortion pills to the pre-2016 policy of 49 days gestation, returning to the pre-2021 in-person dispensing requirement, and returning to requiring prescribers to report all serious adverse events, not just deaths, to the drug sponsor would increase women’s health and safety. l Address weaknesses in the current FAERS (FDA Adverse Events Reporting System). The Administration and policymakers should ensure that health care workers, particularly those in hospitals and emergency rooms, report abortion pill complications. Women who experience complications from abortion pills typically go to an emergency room, not to the abortion pill prescriber, so putting the onus of reporting on the prescriber who typically has no idea that a complication has occurred means that the FAERS is seriously undercounting adverse events. Submitting an adverse event to the database should be a quick and efficient process for busy health care practitioners. Currently, providers report that the process is difficult and convoluted. l Implement a policy of transparency about inspections of the abortion pill’s sponsors, Danco and GenBioPro, as well as facilities that manufacture the pills. The FDA should respond to congressional requests and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests about inspections, compliance, and post-marketing safety in a timely manner. l Stop promoting or approving mail-order abortions in violation of long-standing federal laws that prohibit the mailing and interstate carriage of abortion drugs.16 Vaccine Importation. Thousands of Americans of faith and conscience wish to receive various childhood vaccinations for themselves and their families but are not allowed to receive vaccines that are derived through or tested on aborted fetal cells. For example, the chickenpox, Hepatitis, and MMR vaccines in the U.S. are all linked to abortion in this way. There are ethically derived alternatives abroad that have been used safely there for decades, but the FDA makes it exceedingly difficult for Americans to import them. In January 2021, the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and the FDA jointly announced that HHS was required by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act — 460 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise (RFRA)17 to allow bulk importation by doctors of certain Japanese-made vaccines to accommodate religious needs of patients, but the Biden FDA unlawfully revoked this waiver. The FDA should restore the waiver to comply with RFRA and for the obvious public health benefits of increased childhood vaccination by families seek- ing ethically derived alternatives. To avoid future moral coercion of the sort experienced with the COVID-19 vac- cines, the FDA and NIH should require the development of drugs and biologics that are free from moral taint and switch to cell lines that are not derived from aborted fetal cell lines or aborted baby body parts. Conflicts of Interest. A 2018 report in Science found that more than two-thirds of FDA reviewers later ended up at the same companies whose products they had been reviewing while they were working for the government.18 This revolving door is one mechanism by which pharmaceutical companies capture the agencies that regulate them. The FDA should impose a lengthy cooling off period for reviewers, preventing them from working for companies they regulated. In 1997, the FDA relaxed regulations to permit broadcast drug advertisements, after which Big Pharma began routine direct-to-consumer advertising, making the United States and New Zealand the only countries where such practices are legal. Following the 1997 changes, pharma became the largest advertiser for all major media organizations. This buys considerable influence in the newsroom—whether media companies acknowledge this or not—and distorts independent reporting on public health issues. The FDA or Congress should regulate where and how paid advertising is used by pharmaceutical companies more stringently, especially on media outlets. NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH) The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the world’s largest biomedical research agency and is made up of 27 different components called Institutes and Centers. Despite its popular image as a benign science agency, NIH was respon- sible for paying for research in aborted baby body parts, human animal chimera experiments, and gain-of-function viral research that may have been responsible for COVID-19. Bioethics Reform. Research using fetal tissue obtained from elective abortions is immoral and obsolete. Research using human embryonic stem cells also involves the destruction of human life and should not be subsidized with taxpayer dollars. Good science and life-affirming, ethical research are not mutually exclusive. In fact, ethically derived sources such as discarded surgical tissue and adult stem cells (made pluripotent), not tissue obtained from elective abortions, have contributed the most successful treatments for a variety of ailments. Congress authorized HHS to choose not to fund extramural abortion-de- rived fetal tissue research that fails ethics advisory board review, and in 2019, the

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Grassley, Chuck

Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment Act of 2026

119/s/3977

A bill to expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.

119/s/2677

Protecting First Responders from Secondary Exposure Act of 2025

119/s/180

Back to All Bills