A resolution commending Delta State University in Cleveland, Mississippi, for 100 years of service to the State of Mississippi and the United States.

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/sres/489

Last Updated: December 1, 2025

A resolution commending Delta State University in Cleveland, Mississippi, for 100 years of service to the State of Mississippi and the United States.

SRES. 489, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Sen. Hyde-Smith, Cindy [R-MS]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$105,278 raised

24 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

55% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Education" section, p. 368-370 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Invalid Date

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this congressional resolution, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a resolution is not the same as a bill that becomes a law. It's more of a statement or expression of opinion by Congress.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of SRES 489 is to commend Delta State University for its 100 years of service to the state of Mississippi and the United States. The resolution aims to recognize the university's academic, cultural, and athletic excellence.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** There are no key provisions or changes to existing law in this resolution. It's simply a statement of appreciation and recognition for Delta State University's achievements. Remember when we learned about the different types of bills in Congress? This is an example of a non-binding resolution, which doesn't have any legislative effect.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* Delta State University * The state of Mississippi * The United States (as a whole) * The students, faculty, and staff of Delta State University

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this resolution is minimal. It's primarily symbolic, serving as a gesture of appreciation for the university's contributions to education and the community. However, it may have some indirect benefits, such as boosting morale or attracting attention to the university's achievements.

As I'm sure you recall from our 8th grade civics class, Congress has the power to pass resolutions like this one under Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution, which grants them the authority to "determine the Rules of its Proceedings." But let's be real, folks, this is not exactly a pressing matter that requires congressional attention. Nevertheless, it's an example of how Congress can use resolutions to express opinions or show appreciation for certain individuals or institutions.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go grade some papers and wonder what else I need to reteach to adults who should already know this stuff...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round and listen closely, for I have uncovered a web of deceit hidden in plain sight within the seemingly innocuous SRES 489 bill. On the surface, this resolution appears to be a harmless tribute to Delta State University's centennial anniversary. But, my friends, do not be fooled! There is more to this bill than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose of this bill is to commend Delta State University for its 100 years of service to Mississippi and the United States. However, I believe this is merely a smokescreen to distract us from the true intentions. The real objective is to subtly promote the university's ties to the government and its role in shaping the minds of future generations.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Upon closer inspection, we find that this bill contains several provisions that seem innocuous but actually reveal a more sinister agenda:

* The resolution highlights Delta State University's involvement in various programs, such as the Delta Music Institute and the Commercial Aviation Department. This is not mere coincidence; these programs are likely being used to groom students for future roles in the government's surveillance state. * The bill also mentions the university's partnership with the local community to attract the Grammy Museum Mississippi. This is a clever ploy to promote cultural control, using music as a tool to shape public opinion and manipulate the masses.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* Delta State University, which will receive praise and recognition for its supposed achievements. * The government, which will use this resolution to further entrench its influence over education and culture. * The students and faculty of Delta State University, who will be unwittingly drawn into the government's web of control.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The implications of this bill are far-reaching:

* By commending Delta State University for its service, the government is subtly promoting a narrative that reinforces its own authority and influence over education. * The resolution's focus on cultural and athletic excellence serves as a distraction from the university's true purpose: to produce compliant citizens who will serve the interests of the state. * This bill sets a precedent for future resolutions, which may be used to promote other institutions and programs that serve the government's agenda.

In conclusion, my fellow truth-seekers, do not be deceived by the seemingly innocuous language of SRES 489. This bill is merely a small part of a larger scheme to control our minds, shape our culture, and maintain the government's grip on power. Stay vigilant, for in the world of politics, nothing is as it seems!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(With a healthy dose of sarcasm and a smirk) Oh, folks, we've got a real doozy for you tonight! SRES 489, the most pressing issue facing our great nation... (dramatic pause) ...a resolution commending Delta State University in Cleveland, Mississippi, for 100 years of service to the state and the United States. I mean, who wouldn't want to spend their taxpayer dollars on this vital piece of legislation? (eye roll)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to give a big ol' pat on the back to Delta State University for its century-long service. That's right, folks; our esteemed lawmakers are taking time out of their busy schedules to acknowledge the university's academic, cultural, and athletic excellence. Because, clearly, that's what's been holding America back – not enough congressional resolutions praising universities.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** There aren't any changes to existing law here, folks. This is purely a feel-good resolution, designed to make everyone involved look good. The Senate is simply expressing its admiration for Delta State University and requesting that the Secretary of the Senate send an enrolled copy of this resolution to the university's president, provost, and athletic director.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties here are the students, faculty, and staff of Delta State University, who will no doubt be thrilled to receive this congressional commendation. I mean, it's not like they have better things to worry about, like tuition costs or academic rigor. And let's not forget the taxpayers, who get to foot the bill for this exercise in futility.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this resolution is... (dramatic pause) ...zero. Zilch. Nada. It won't create jobs, stimulate economic growth, or address any pressing national issues. But hey, it's a nice gesture, right? I mean, who doesn't love a good pat on the back every now and then? The implications are equally non-existent, except perhaps to further reinforce the notion that our lawmakers have too much time on their hands.

(With a wink) And there you have it, folks – SRES 489 in all its glory. A shining example of congressional efficiency and effectiveness... (sarcastic tone) ...not.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

(sigh) Oh joy, another meaningless resolution from the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of SRES 489 is to pat Delta State University on the back for existing for 100 years. Wow, what an accomplishment. The objectives are to "commend" and "recognize" the university for its academic, cultural, and athletic excellence. Because, clearly, this is a pressing national issue that requires Congressional attention.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** There are no key provisions or changes to existing law. This resolution is a feel-good exercise in self-congratulation. It's a ceremonial gesture, devoid of any substance or impact. The Senate is essentially saying, "Hey, Delta State University, good job on not imploding over the past century!"

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties are Delta State University, its administrators (who will no doubt display this resolution proudly in their offices), and the students who might get a fleeting sense of pride from this meaningless gesture. The stakeholders are the taxpayers who fund this Congressional navel-gazing exercise.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact is zero. Zilch. Nada. This resolution will not improve education, create jobs, or address any pressing national issue. It's a waste of time and resources. The implications are that our elected officials have nothing better to do than engage in empty symbolism, while real problems fester.

Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a bad case of " Congressional Attention Deficit Disorder" (CADD). Symptoms include an inability to focus on meaningful legislation, a penchant for grandstanding, and a complete disregard for the actual needs of the country. Treatment involves a healthy dose of skepticism, a strong critical thinking regimen, and a commitment to tackling real problems.

In short, SRES 489 is a pointless exercise in self-aggrandizement, a perfect example of how our politicians waste time and resources on trivialities while ignoring the pressing issues that actually matter.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

Let's break down this congressional resolution, SRES 489, and get the lowdown on what it's all about.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This resolution is like a big ol' high-five to Delta State University in Cleveland, Mississippi, for hitting its 100-year milestone. The Senate wants to acknowledge the university's contributions to education, culture, and athletics in the state of Mississippi and the US as a whole. It's all about showin' some love and respect for this institution's dedication to servin' its students and community.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** There aren't any major changes to existing law here, bro. This resolution is more like a ceremonial nod of approval, recognizing Delta State University's achievements over the past century. It's not creating new policies or regulations; it's just a feel-good gesture from the Senate.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The main stakeholders here are:

* Delta State University (obviously) * The state of Mississippi * The US government (specifically, the Senate) * Students and faculty at Delta State University * The local community in Cleveland, Mississippi

These parties will likely be stoked to see this resolution pass, as it's a recognition of their hard work and dedication.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The impact of this resolution is mostly symbolic, bro. It won't have any direct effects on policy or law. However, it might:

* Boost morale at Delta State University * Enhance the university's reputation nationwide * Encourage more students to consider attending Delta State University * Strengthen ties between the university and its local community

It's like a big pat on the back for Delta State University, acknowledging its commitment to education and service. The resolution might also inspire other institutions to strive for similar excellence.

In summary, SRES 489 is all about giving props to Delta State University for its 100-year anniversary. It's a heartwarming gesture from the Senate that recognizes the university's achievements without making any significant changes to existing law.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**SRES 489: A Resolution Commending Delta State University**

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main purpose of SRES 489 is to commend Delta State University in Cleveland, Mississippi, for its 100 years of service to the state and the United States. The resolution aims to recognize the university's academic, cultural, and athletic excellence.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** This resolution does not propose any changes to existing law. It is a ceremonial resolution that expresses appreciation for Delta State University's contributions to education and community development in Mississippi.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties include:

1. Delta State University: The university is the primary beneficiary of this resolution, as it receives recognition for its achievements. 2. Students and alumni: Current students and alumni may take pride in their institution's accomplishments and reputation. 3. Local community: The city of Cleveland, Mississippi, and surrounding areas may benefit from the positive publicity generated by this resolution.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The impact of this resolution is largely symbolic, as it does not provide any tangible benefits or funding to Delta State University. However, it may:

1. Enhance the university's reputation: The resolution's recognition of Delta State University's excellence may attract more students, faculty, and staff. 2. Foster community engagement: The resolution may encourage local residents to take pride in their institution and participate in its activities. 3. Influence future funding decisions: Although this resolution does not provide direct funding, it may positively influence future appropriations or grants for Delta State University.

**Monied Interest Analysis** This resolution appears to be a genuine tribute to Delta State University's achievements, with no apparent monied interests at play. However, it is worth noting that Senators Hyde-Smith and Wicker, the sponsors of this resolution, have received campaign contributions from various education-related PACs, such as the National Education Association (NEA) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT). While these contributions do not seem directly related to this specific resolution, they may indicate a broader interest in supporting education initiatives.

In conclusion, SRES 489 is a ceremonial resolution that recognizes Delta State University's achievements without proposing any changes to existing law. Its impact is largely symbolic, but it may have positive effects on the university's reputation and community engagement.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Hyde-Smith, Cindy [R-MS]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$105,278

23 donors

PACs

Organizations

$5,650

Committees

Individuals

$99,628

No PAC contributions found

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

1 transaction

$2,900

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

1 transaction

$1,500

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

1 transaction

$1,000

THE CHICKASAW NATION

1 transaction

$250

No committee contributions found

LUROS, HILARY

2 transactions

$13,200

BESSENT, SCOTT

1 transaction

$6,600

FREEMAN, JOHN

1 transaction

$6,600

CASTLE, JOHN

1 transaction

$6,600

SEEMANN, WILLIAM III

1 transaction

$6,600

SEEMANN, WILL H. IV

1 transaction

$6,600

BORDELON, BEN

1 transaction

$6,600

FULCHER, JUSTIN

1 transaction

$6,600

DWIRE, JEFF

1 transaction

$5,205

HUSTON, DANNY

1 transaction

$4,100

GOLDING, STEVE D.

1 transaction

$3,800

BUTCHER, JAMES

1 transaction

$3,435

FORBES, MARILYN

1 transaction

$3,435

FORBES, STEPHEN

1 transaction

$3,435

MARTIN JR, E E

1 transaction

$3,409

PIZZA, JOE M.

1 transaction

$3,409

NICAUD, JENNIFER

1 transaction

$3,400

AUSTIN, CLINT

1 transaction

$3,300

AUSTIN, DIONNE CHOUEST

1 transaction

$3,300

Donor Network - Sen. Hyde-Smith, Cindy [R-MS]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 52 nodes and 24 connections (51 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $105,278

Top Donors - Sen. Hyde-Smith, Cindy [R-MS]

Showing top 23 donors by contribution amount

4 Orgs19 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Education

Weak

Vector: 56%

Pages: 368-370AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"SRES 489 is a ceremonial resolution honoring a university's centennial, while the Project 2025 Education section advocates specific policy reforms (e.g., rescinding Equity in IDEA, modifying school meals, phasing out IDR plans). The only connection is a broad focus on education, with no substantive policy alignment."

Key themes:educationhigher educationrecognition

— 336 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise on civil rights, the next conservative Administration should take sweeping action to assure that the purpose of the Civil Rights Act is not inverted through a disparate impact standard to provide a pretext for theoretically endless federal meddling. Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities; Preschool Grants for Children with Disabilities (Equity in IDEA) l Effective January 18, 2017, the department issued final regulations under Part B of IDEA that require states to consider race and ethnicity in the identification, placement, and discipline of students with disabilities. The new Administration should rescind this regulation. Students should never be denied access to special education services because of their race or ethnicity, but this is happening in school districts across the country thanks to the Obama Administration’s Equity in IDEA regulation. This was not the intent of the regulation, but it is an inevitable byproduct of its flawed assumptions. The Obama Administration looked at the racial statistics on special education assignment and made two assumptions: that African American students were dis- proportionately overrepresented, and that this overrepresentation constituted a harm that required federal pressure to ameliorate. School districts deemed to overrepresent minority students in special education assignment, or in discipline amongst special education students, are tagged by their state education agencies as engaging in “significant disproportionality,” and are required to reallocate 15 percent of their IDEA Part B money into coordinated early intervening services that are intended to address the “root causes of dispro- portionality.” In practice, this can mean raiding special education funding to pay for CRT-inspired “equity” consultants and professional development. This is especially problematic given that both of the assumptions behind Equity in IDEA are flawed. Special education services provide extra assistance to students; they do not harm them. And according to the most rigorous research on the subject, conducted by Penn State’s Paul Morgan, black students are actually underrep- resented in special education once adequate statistical controls are made. That means that this regulation effectively further depresses the provision of valuable services to an already underserved group. l The next Administration should immediately commence rulemaking to rescind the Equity in IDEA regulation. No replacement regulation is required. l The Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) should prepare a digest of the best research on this subject and share — 337 — Department of Education it directly with state superintendents and state special education leaders across the country, who have been led by this regulation to believe a false problem diagnosis. Every effort should be made to dissuade states from continuing to operate on the assumption that overrepresentation requires state intervention after the federal pressure is rescinded. Provide School Meals to Children in Need; Do Not Use Federal Meals to Support Radical Ideology In May 2022, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) tried to advance a radical political agenda using the federal school meal program. Nearly a century ago, federal lawmakers adopted the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and School Breakfast Program (SBP) and other services that provide meals for K–12 students to give children from low-income families access to food while at school. Since the 1940s, federal lawmakers have greatly expanded these meal programs, creating an entitlement for nearly all students, regardless of family income levels, and have turned the meal programs into some of the most wasteful federal pro- grams in Washington. Now, the USDA is threatening to withhold federal taxpayer spending for these meals from schools that do not implement Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 so that the term “sex” is replaced with “sexual orientation and gender identity” (SOGI). l The next Administration should prohibit the USDA or any other federal agency from withholding services from federal or state agencies—including but not limited to K–12 schools—that choose not to replace “sex” with “SOGI” in that agency’s administration of Title IX. The Administration will have significant support for this policy change among state officials and Members of Congress. Twenty-two state attorneys general filed a lawsuit after the USDA’s announcement that the agency intended to withhold spending from schools that do not replace sex with SOGI. Members of Congress also introduced legislation in 2022 that would prohibit the agency from carrying out its intentions regarding Title IX. Phase Out Existing Income-Driven Repayment Plans While income-driven repayment (IDR) of student loans is a superior approach relative to fixed payment plans, the number of IDR plans has proliferated beyond reason. And recent IDR plans are so generous that they require no or only token repayment from many students. l The Secretary should phase out all existing IDR plans by making new loans (including consolidation loans) ineligible and should implement

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 57%

Pages: 518-520AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"SRES 489 is a ceremonial resolution honoring Delta State University's centennial with no policy substance, while the Project 2025 HHS section focuses on abortion training compliance, maternal health, childcare funding, and rural/Indian health services—there is no thematic or policy overlap."

— 486 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Investigate state medical school compliance with the Coats–Snowe Amendment,71 which prohibits discrimination against health care entities that do not provide or undergo training for abortion. 2. Ensure that the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) complies with all relevant conscience statutes and regulations and that states have taken the affirmative steps (for example, by issuing regulations) to assure compliance with Coats–Snowe. 3. Communicate to medical schools that any abortion-related training must be on an opt-in rather than opt-out basis. 4. Require states that receive HHS funds to issue regulations or enter into arrangements with accrediting bodies to comply with the Coats–Snowe Amendment’s prohibition of mandatory abortion training by individuals or institutions. The Coats–Snowe Amendment specifically requires such state regulations or arrangements. l Prioritize funding for home-based childcare, not universal day care. As HRSA’s Early Childhood Health page outlines, “Currently, only about half of U.S. preschoolers are on-track with their development and ready for school. And more than one in four of children (28%) who experience abuse or neglect are under 3 years old.”72 Concurrently, children who spend significant time in day care experience higher rates of anxiety, depression, and neglect as well as poor educational and developmental outcomes. Instead of providing universal day care, funding should go to parents either to offset the cost of staying home with a child or to pay for familial, in-home childcare. l Provide education and resources on early childhood health. By partnering with new organizations like the Center on Child and Family Poverty, HRSA should provide resources and information on the importance of the mother–child relationship in child well-being. This should include relationship education curricula that equip mothers and caregivers to connect with and improve their understanding of their infants, toddlers, and young children. Maternal and Child Health. Currently, the HRSA Maternal and Child Health program is collecting data on the benefits of doulas in improving the health, safety, and emotional well-being of mothers at birth. Doulas provide a patient-focused, nonmedical support system for single or married mothers that “decreases the — 487 — Department of Health and Human Services overall cesarean rate by 50%, the length of labor by 25%, the use of oxytocin by 40%, and requests for an epidural by 60%. Doulas often use the power of touch and massage to reduce stress and anxiety during labor.”73 Given concerns about maternal mortality or postpartum depression that is worsened by poor birth experiences, doulas should be an active option for all women whether they are giving birth in a traditional hospital, through midwifery, or at home. Additionally, since most Doulas’ services are not covered by traditional insurance programs, the Maternal and Child Health program should work to pro- vide funding for low-income mothers. INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE (IHS) The Indian Health Service serves our American Indian and Alaska Native popu- lations. Reforms are needed to improve America’s ability to deliver on its promises to these important populations and must take account of cultural preferences and lifestyles, limitations due to geography (such as challenging terrain), and limited Internet access. For example, contacting individuals within some of these com- munities and tribes during the COVID-19 pandemic proved to be difficult because many had transient addresses and unreliable cell service. During the transition to the Biden Administration, IHS abandoned tribes as their sources of COVID-19 tests and vaccine supplies disappeared. It is important to guard against such situations in order to preserve these tribes’ access to health resources during public health emergencies (PHEs). Even before the pandemic, services available to these populations through federal resources and personnel (such as vision care) were often scarce or nonexistent. Patients in these populations should be empowered to rely on alternatives to IHS through better access to private health care providers. Exploring positive reforms contained in the VA MISSION Act74 could reveal similar opportunities for increased options and access for American Indians and Alaska Natives. RURAL HEALTH A growing concern is the decreasing access to health care services for Americans living in rural, less populated areas. Many find themselves in regions that were not previously as rural as industries move away, taking with them economic prosperity and often medical providers. Others are in essential professions such as farming that by nature necessitate living in regions with fewer city accommodations and economic opportunities. Seeking space for one’s family and cultivating the land are valued goals that are deeply rooted in America’s fabric. Both Congress and an Administration must continually keep in mind how health care policies uniquely affect these regions because their market trends and populations are different from those of more populous regions. Often, rural patients face an hour’s drive to the nearest medical provider or facility or have

Department of Defense

Minimal

Vector: 56%

Pages: 134-136AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill is a ceremonial resolution honoring Delta State University's centennial, while the Project 2025 DoD policy addresses defense exportability, FMS processes, industrial base collaboration, and military recruitment; there is no substantive policy overlap."

— 101 — Department of Defense 1. Ensure that senior U.S. military leadership emphasizes exportability in the initial development of defense systems that are both available and interoperable with our partners and allies. 2. Create a funding mechanism to incentivize exportability in initial planning, which can be recouped after future FMS transactions. l End informal congressional notification. Informal congressional notification or “tiered review” is a hinderance to ensuring timely sales to our global partners. The tiered review process is not codified in law; it is merely a practice by which the Department of State provides a preview of prospective arms transfers before Congress is formally notified.9 1. End the tiered review process to eliminate at least 20 days from the FMS process. 2. Use the tiered review process only when unanimous congressional support is guaranteed in order to eliminate the “weaponization” by select Members of Congress that has prevented billions of dollars of arms sales from moving into formal congressional notification. l Minimize barriers to collaboration. The high cost of developing advanced defense platforms requires the United States to collaborate with key allies to minimize waste, complement strengths, and supplement our defense industrial base to create a system that is greater than that of the United States alone. 1. Enhance defense industrial base planning with partners to allow them to focus on niche areas where there are cost advantages for the United States. 2. Decrease International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to facilitate trade with such allies as the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. 3. Create opportunities to improve the health of the defense supply chain with added opportunities for partners and allies to contribute. l Reform the FMS contracting process. The contracting timeline for the FMS process is shockingly slow. On average, the DOD contracting timeline takes approximately 18 months because of slow bureaucratic processes and chronic understaffing.10 — 102 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Immediately fund more contracting capacity in all services to decrease the contracting timeline and improve the delivery of defense articles to our global partners. 2. Rationalize and speed arms sales decision-making to preclude our enemies from exploiting bureaucratic slothfulness and allow us to manage the development of indigenous defense industrial bases. DOD PERSONNEL The men and women of America’s armed forces are the most critical component of our national defense strategy, but in recent years, they have been overextended, undervalued, and insufficiently resourced. Their families help them to carry the burden of service, but the assistance they receive is disproportionately less than the sacrifices they make. Young civilians who would thrive in a military environ- ment are disenfranchised when educators and influencers discourage them from learning about military service and preparing for the honor of wearing Ameri- ca’s uniform. The United States military is an extraordinary institution, staffed by exceptional people who have defended our nation and changed the course of history, but the Biden Administration, through word and deed, has treated the armed forces as just another place to work. We must restore our military to a place of honor and respect and recruit and retain the individuals who will meet the rigorous standards of excellence that are required for membership in the world’s greatest fighting force. Needed Reforms l Rescue recruiting and retention. Recruiting was the worst in 2022 that it has been in two generations and is expected to be even worse in 2023. Some of the problems are self-inflicted and ongoing. The recruiting problem is not service-specific: It affects the entire Joint Force. 1. Appoint a Special Assistant to the President who will maintain liaison with Congress, DOD, and all other interested parties on the issue of recruiting and retention. 2. Improve recruiting by suspending the use of the recently introduced MHS Genesis system that uses private medical records of potential recruits at Military Entrance Processing Stations (MEPS), creating unnecessary delays and unwarranted rejections.11 3. Improve military recruiters’ access to secondary schools and require completion of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery

Department of Education

Minimal

Vector: 56%

Pages: 383-385AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill is a purely ceremonial resolution praising Delta State University and contains no policy provisions related to school choice, state opt-out of federal education programs, or accreditation reform outlined in Project 2025."

Key themes:higher educationinstitutional recognition

— 351 — Department of Education as the Educational Choice for Children Act. This bill would create a federal scholarship tax credit that would incentivize donors to contribute to nonprofit scholarship granting organizations (SGOs). Eligible families could then use that funding from the SGOs for their children’s education expenses including private school tuition, tutoring, and instructional materials. ADDITIONAL K–12 REFORMS Allowing States to Opt Out of Federal Education Programs. States should be able to opt out of federal education programs such as the Academic Partnerships Lead Us to Success (APLUS) Act. Much of the red tape and regulations that hinder local school districts are handed down from Washington. This regulatory burden far exceeds the federal government’s less than 10 percent financing share of K–12 education. In the most recent fiscal year (FY 2022), states and localities financed 93 percent of K–12 education costs, and the federal government just 7 percent. That 7 percent share should not allow the federal government to dictate state and local education policy. l To restore state and local control of education and reduce the bureaucratic and compliance burden, Congress should allow states to opt out of the dozens of federal K–12 education programs authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, and instead allow states to put their share of federal funding toward any lawful education purpose under state law. This policy has been advanced over the years via a proposal known as the Academic Partnerships Lead Us to Success (APLUS) Act. HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM HEA: Accreditation Reform Congress established two primary responsibilities for the U.S. Department of Education in the HEA: 1) to ensure the “administrative capacity and financial responsibility” of colleges and universities that accept Title IV funds; and 2) to ensure the quality of those institutions. Congress did not endow the Department of Education with the authority to involve itself in academic quality issues relating to colleges and universities that participate in the Title IV student aid program; the HEA allows the agency only to recognize accreditors, which are then supposed to provide quality assurance measures. Unfortunately, the Biden Administration has followed closely in the footsteps of the Obama Administration by engaging in a politically motivated and incon- sistent administration of the accrediting agency recognition process. As a result, accreditors have transformed into de facto government agents. Despite claims by — 352 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise the department and accreditation agencies that accreditation is voluntary, the fact that Americans are denied access to an otherwise widely available entitle- ment benefit if the institution “elects” to not be accredited makes accreditation anything but voluntary. Today, accreditation determines whether Americans can access federal student aid benefits, transfer academic credits, enroll in higher-level degree programs, and even qualify for federal employment. Unnecessarily focused on schools in a specific geographic region, institutional accreditation reviews have also become wildly expensive audits by academic “peers” that stifle innovation and discourage new institutions of higher education. Of par- ticular concern are efforts by many accreditation agencies to leverage their Title IV (student loans and grants) gatekeeper roles to force institutions to adopt policies that have nothing to do with academic quality assurance and student outcomes. One egregious example of this is the extent to which accreditors have forced col- leges and universities, many of them faith-based institutions, to adopt diversity, equity, and inclusion policies that conflict with federal civil rights laws, state laws, and the institutional mission and culture of the schools. Perhaps more distress- ingly, accreditors, while professing support for academic freedom and campus free speech, have presided over a precipitous decline in both over the past decade. Despite maintaining criteria that demand such policies, accreditors have done nothing to dampen the illiberal chill that has swept across American campuses over the past decade. The current system is not working. A radical overhaul of the HEA’s accreditation requirements is thus in order. The next Administration should work with Congress to amend the HEA and should consider the following reforms: l Prohibit accreditation agencies from leveraging their Title IV gatekeeper role to mandate that educational institutions adopt diversity, equity, and inclusion policies. l Protect the sovereignty of states to decide governance and leadership issues for their state-supported colleges and universities by prohibiting accreditation agencies from intruding upon the governance of state-supported educational institutions. l Protect faith-based institutions by prohibiting accreditation agencies from: 1. Requiring standards and criteria that undermine the religious beliefs of, or require policies or conduct that conflict with, the religious mission or religious beliefs of the institution; and

Department of Education

Minimal

Vector: 56%

Pages: 374-376AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"SRES 489 is a purely ceremonial resolution honoring a university's centennial and does not address any of the Project 2025 Department of Education policy priorities such as student loan reform, market-based accountability, or federal aid restructuring."

Key themes:higher educationuniversity

— 341 — Department of Education market prices and signals to influence educational borrowing, introducing consumer-driven accountability into higher education. Pell grants should retain their current voucher-like structure. If Congress is unwilling to reform federal student aid, then the next Adminis- tration should consider the following reforms: l Switch to fair-value accounting from FCRA accounting, and l Consolidate all federal loan programs into one new program that 1. Utilizes income-driven repayment, 2. Includes no interest rate subsidies or loan forgiveness, 3. Includes annual and aggregate limits on borrowing, and 4. Requires “skin in the game” from colleges to help hold them accountable for loan repayment. The Biden Administration has mercilessly pillaged the student loan portfolio for crass political purposes without regard to the needs of current taxpayers or future students. This must never happen again. l As detailed in Section III, the next Administration should work with Congress to spin off federal student aid into a new government corporation with professional governance and management. NEW POLICY PRIORITIES FOR 2025 AND BEYOND New Legislation That Should Be Prioritized For nearly 250 years, Congress has incorporated public and private institutions, including banks, the District of Columbia’s city government, and other organiza- tions that federal officials deem to be conducting operations in the public interest. Such charters offer a certain status to organizations, often viewed as a “seal of approval” according to one Congressional Research Service report, which can help these organizations in their fundraising and other advocacy efforts. When the nation’s largest teacher association, the National Education Associ- ation (NEA), cites its federal charter, it lends the NEA a level of significance and suggests an effectiveness that is not supported by evidence. In fact, the NEA and the nation’s other large teacher union, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT),

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Hyde-Smith, Cindy

A bill to establish the Grand Village of the Natchez Indians and Jefferson College as affiliated areas of the National Park System, and for other purposes.

119/s/3878

A bill to amend the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 to make technical corrections.

119/s/1155

Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026

119/s/2465

Back to All Bills