A resolution congratulating Vermont Green Football Club on winning the United Soccer League Two National Championship.
Download PDFSponsored by
Sen. Welch, Peter [D-VT]
ID: W000800
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S8676)
December 11, 2025
Introduced
Committee Review
đ Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
Floor Action
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
đ How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
(sigh) Oh joy, another meaningless resolution from the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** To congratulate Vermont Green Football Club on winning a minor league soccer championship. Wow, what a monumental achievement that requires Congressional recognition. I'm sure the fate of the nation depends on it.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** None. This is a non-binding resolution, which means it's just a feel-good gesture with no actual impact on law or policy. It's like giving a participation trophy to a team that actually won something.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Vermont Green Football Club (the "Boys in Green"), their fans, and the Senators who sponsored this resolution (Welch and Sanders). I'm sure the players are thrilled to receive a pat on the back from Congress. Who wouldn't want to be congratulated by a group of self-serving politicians?
**Potential Impact & Implications:** Zero. Zilch. Nada. This resolution won't change anything, except maybe the ego sizes of the Senators involved. It's a classic example of legislative theater, designed to make politicians look good while accomplishing nothing.
Now, let's diagnose the real disease behind this bill:
* **Symptoms:** Empty grandstanding, lack of meaningful policy work, and an obvious attempt to curry favor with constituents. * **Underlying Condition:** Politicians' insatiable need for self-aggrandizement and their desire to appear relevant. * **Tumor on the X-ray:** The influence of sports lobby groups and local interests, which likely contributed to this resolution's introduction.
In medical terms, this bill is a benign tumor â harmless but annoying. It's a waste of time and resources, but hey, at least it's not actively harming anyone... yet.
To the Senators involved: Congratulations on wasting taxpayer money on a pointless resolution. I'm sure your constituents are thrilled to see their hard-earned cash spent on this exercise in futility.
And to Vermont Green Football Club: Enjoy your meaningless Congressional recognition. It's not like you actually accomplished something worthy of national attention or anything...
Related Topics
đ° Campaign Finance Network
Sen. Welch, Peter [D-VT]
Congress 119 ⢠2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT]
ID: S000033
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Sen. Welch, Peter [D-VT]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 22 nodes and 25 connections
Total contributions: $48,700
Top Donors - Sen. Welch, Peter [D-VT]
Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount
Project 2025 Policy Matches
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. Higher similarity scores indicate stronger thematic connections.
Introduction
â 533 â Department of the Interior order to fulfill the yet-unaltered congressional mandate contained in federal law, to provide for jobs and well-paying employment opportunities in rural Oregon, and to ameliorate the effects of wildfires, the new Administration must immedi- ately fulfill its responsibilities and manage the O&C lands for âpermanent forest productionâ to ensure that the timber is âsold, cut, and removed.â79 NEPA Reforms. Congress never intended for the National Environmental Policy Act to grow into the tree-killing, project-dooming, decade-spanning mon- strosity that it has become. Instead, in 1970, Congress intended a short, succinct, timely presentation of information regarding major federal action that signifi- cantly affects the quality of the human environment so that decisionmakers can make informed decisions to benefit the American people. The Trump Administration adopted common-sense NEPA reform that must be restored immediately. Meanwhile, DOI should reinstate the secretarial orders adopted by the Trump Administration, such as placing time and page limits on NEPA documents and setting forthâon page oneâthe costs of the document itself. Meanwhile, the new Administration should call upon Congress to reform NEPA to meet its original goal. Consideration should be given, for example, to eliminat- ing judicial review of the adequacy of NEPA documents or the rectitude of NEPA decisions. This would allow Congress to engage in effective oversight of federal agencies when prudent. Settlement Transparency. Interior Secretary David Bernhardt required DOI to prominently display and provide open access to any and all litigation settlements into which DOI or its agencies entered, and any attorneysâ fees paid for ending the litigation.80 Bidenâs DOI, aware that the settlements into which it planned to enter and the attorneysâ fees it was likely to pay would cause controversy, ended this policy.81 A new Administration should reinstate it. The Endangered Species Act. The Endangered Species Act was intended to bring endangered and threatened species back from the brink of extinction and, when appropriate, to restore real habitat critical to the survival of the spe- cies. The actâs success rate, however, is dismal. Its greatest deficiency, according to one renowned expert, is âconflict of interest.â82 Specifically, the work of the Fish and Wildlife Service is the product of âspecies cartelsâ afflicted with group- think, confirmation bias, and a common desire to preserve the prestige, power, and appropriations of the agency that pays or employs them. For example, in one highly influential sage-grouse monograph, 41 percent of the authors were federal workers. The editor, a federal bureaucrat, had authored one-third of the paper.83 Meaningful reform of the Endangered Species Act requires that Congress take action to restore its original purpose and end its use to seize private prop- erty, prevent economic development, and interfere with the rights of states over their wildlife populations. In the meantime, a new Administration should take the following immediate action:
Introduction
â 533 â Department of the Interior order to fulfill the yet-unaltered congressional mandate contained in federal law, to provide for jobs and well-paying employment opportunities in rural Oregon, and to ameliorate the effects of wildfires, the new Administration must immedi- ately fulfill its responsibilities and manage the O&C lands for âpermanent forest productionâ to ensure that the timber is âsold, cut, and removed.â79 NEPA Reforms. Congress never intended for the National Environmental Policy Act to grow into the tree-killing, project-dooming, decade-spanning mon- strosity that it has become. Instead, in 1970, Congress intended a short, succinct, timely presentation of information regarding major federal action that signifi- cantly affects the quality of the human environment so that decisionmakers can make informed decisions to benefit the American people. The Trump Administration adopted common-sense NEPA reform that must be restored immediately. Meanwhile, DOI should reinstate the secretarial orders adopted by the Trump Administration, such as placing time and page limits on NEPA documents and setting forthâon page oneâthe costs of the document itself. Meanwhile, the new Administration should call upon Congress to reform NEPA to meet its original goal. Consideration should be given, for example, to eliminat- ing judicial review of the adequacy of NEPA documents or the rectitude of NEPA decisions. This would allow Congress to engage in effective oversight of federal agencies when prudent. Settlement Transparency. Interior Secretary David Bernhardt required DOI to prominently display and provide open access to any and all litigation settlements into which DOI or its agencies entered, and any attorneysâ fees paid for ending the litigation.80 Bidenâs DOI, aware that the settlements into which it planned to enter and the attorneysâ fees it was likely to pay would cause controversy, ended this policy.81 A new Administration should reinstate it. The Endangered Species Act. The Endangered Species Act was intended to bring endangered and threatened species back from the brink of extinction and, when appropriate, to restore real habitat critical to the survival of the spe- cies. The actâs success rate, however, is dismal. Its greatest deficiency, according to one renowned expert, is âconflict of interest.â82 Specifically, the work of the Fish and Wildlife Service is the product of âspecies cartelsâ afflicted with group- think, confirmation bias, and a common desire to preserve the prestige, power, and appropriations of the agency that pays or employs them. For example, in one highly influential sage-grouse monograph, 41 percent of the authors were federal workers. The editor, a federal bureaucrat, had authored one-third of the paper.83 Meaningful reform of the Endangered Species Act requires that Congress take action to restore its original purpose and end its use to seize private prop- erty, prevent economic development, and interfere with the rights of states over their wildlife populations. In the meantime, a new Administration should take the following immediate action: â 534 â Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Delist the grizzly bear in the Greater Yellowstone and Northern Continental Divide Ecosystems and defend to the Supreme Court of the United States the agencyâs fact-based decision to do so.84 l Delist the gray wolf in the lower 48 states in light of its full recovery under the ESA.85 l Cede to western states jurisdiction over the greater sage-grouse, recognizing the on-the-ground expertise of states and preventing use of the sage-grouse to interfere with public access to public land and economic activity. l Direct the Fish and Wildlife Service to end its abuse of Section 10(j) of the ESA by re-introducing so-called âexperiment speciesâ populations into areas that no longer qualify as habitat and lie outside the historic ranges of those species, which brings with it the full weight of the ESA in areas previously without federal government oversight.86 l Direct the Fish and Wildlife Service to design and implement an impartial conservation triage program by prioritizing the allocation of limited resources to maximize conservation returns, relative to the conservation goals, under a constrained budget.87 l Direct the Fish and Wildlife Service to make all data used in ESA decisions available to the public, with limited or no exceptions, to fulfill the publicâs right to know and to prevent the agencyâs previous opaque decision-making. l Abolish the Biological Resources Division of the U.S. Geological Survey and obtain necessary scientific research about species of concern from universities via competitive requests for proposals. l Direct the Fish and Wildlife Service to: (1) design and implement an Endangered Species Act program that ensures independent decision- making by ending reliance on so-called species specialists who have obvious self-interest, ideological bias, and land-use agendas; and (2) ensure conformity with the Information Quality Act.88 Office of Surface Mining. The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) was created by the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA)89 to administer programs for controlling the impacts of surface coal mining operations. Although the coal industry is contracting, coal constitutes
Introduction
â 89 â Section 2: The Common Defense The solution to this problem is strong political leadership. Skinner writes, âThe next Administration must take swift and decisive steps to reforge the department into a lean and functional diplomatic machine that serves the President and, thereby, the American people.â Because the Senate has been extraordinarily lax in fulfilling its constitutional obligation to confirm presidential appointees, she recommends putting appointees into acting roles until such time as the Senate confirms them. Skinner writes that State should also stop skirting the Constitutionâs trea- ty-making requirements and stop enforcing âagreementsâ as treaties. It should encourage more trade with allies, particularly with Great Britain, and less with adversaries. And it should implement a âsovereign Mexicoâ policy, as our neighbor âhas functionally lost its sovereignty to muscular criminal cartels that effectively run the country.â In Africa, Skinner writes, the U.S. âshould focus on core security, economic, and human rightsâ rather than impose radical abortion and pro-LGBT initiatives. Divisive symbols such as the rainbow flag or the Black Lives Matter flag have no place next to the Stars and Stripes at our embassies. When it comes to China, Skinner writes that âa policy of âcompete where we must, but cooperate where we canââŚhas demonstrably failed.â The Peopleâs Repub- lic of Chinaâs (PRC) âaggressive behavior,â she writes, âcan only be curbed through external pressure.â Efforts to protect or excuse China must stop. She observes, â[M]any were quick to dismiss even the possibility that COVID escaped from a Chinese research laboratory.â Meanwhile, Skinner writes, â[g]lobal leaders includ- ing President Joe BidenâŚhave tried to normalize or even laud Chinese behavior.â She adds, âIn some cases, these voices, like global corporate giants BlackRock and Disneyââor the National Basketball Association (NBA)ââdirectly benefit from doing business with Beijing.â Former vice president of the U.S. Agency for Global Media Mora Namdar writes in Chapter 8 that we need to have people working for USAGM who actually believe in America, rather than allowing the agencies to function as anti-American, tax- payer-funded entities that parrot our adversariesâ propaganda and talking points. Former acting deputy secretary of homeland security Ken Cuccinelli says in Chap- ter 5 that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), a creation of the George W. Bush era, should be closed, as it has added needless additional bureaucracy and expense without corresponding benefit. He recommends that it be replaced with a new âstand-alone border and immigration agency at the Cabinet levelâ and that the remaining parts of DHS be distributed among other departments. Former chief of staff for the director of National Intelligence Dustin Carmack writes in Chapter 7 that the U.S. Intelligence Community is too inclined to look in the rearview mirror, engage in âgroupthink,â and employ an âoverly cautiousâ approach aimed at personal approval rather than at offering the most accurate, unvarnished intelligence for the benefit of the country. And in Chapter 9, former acting deputy administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development Max â 90 â Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Primorac asserts that the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) must be reformed, writing, âThe Biden Administration has deformed the agency by treating it as a global platform to pursue overseas a divisive political and cultural agenda that promotes abortion, climate extremism, gender radicalism, and interventions against perceived systematic racism.â If the recommendations in the following chapters are adopted, what Skinner says about the State Department could be true for other parts of the federal gov- ernmentâs national security and foreign policy apparatus: The next conservative President has the opportunity to restructure the making and execution of U.S. defense and foreign policy and reset the nationâs role in the world. The recom- mendations outlined in this section provide guidance on how the next President should use the federal governmentâs vast resources to do just that.
Showing 3 of 5 policy matches
About These Correlations
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.