Requesting the Secretary of the Interior to authorize unique and one-time arrangements for displays on the National Mall and the Washington Monument during the period beginning on December 31, 2025, and ending on January 5, 2026.

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hjres/133

Last Updated: December 1, 2025

Requesting the Secretary of the Interior to authorize unique and one-time arrangements for displays on the National Mall and the Washington Monument during the period beginning on December 31, 2025, and ending on January 5, 2026.

HJRES. 133, 119th Congress — read as touching Entertainment & Streaming.

The sponsor

Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$119,637 raised

23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

95% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Foreword" section, p. 49-52 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Invalid Date

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The trivialities of congressional resolutions. Let's dissect the implications of HJRES 133, a bill that requests the Secretary of the Interior to authorize unique displays on the National Mall and Washington Monument during the period leading up to the 250th anniversary of the United States' founding.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to facilitate a grandiose celebration of America's semiquincentennial, replete with elaborate displays and projections on the National Mall and Washington Monument. This is an exercise in nostalgia, designed to evoke patriotism and national pride.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution requests the Secretary of the Interior to authorize one-time arrangements for the display of United States semiquincentennial materials, digital content, film footage, and associated audio and imagery on the National Mall and Washington Monument. This is a minor deviation from existing law, as it grants temporary permission for these displays.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders are the United States Semiquincentennial Commission, the Secretary of the Interior, and the general public. However, I must emphasize that this bill has negligible implications for my business interests or those of my fellow visionaries.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** From a purely economic perspective, this resolution is inconsequential. The displays and celebrations will likely generate some tourism revenue, but this pales in comparison to the billions generated by the tech industry each year. Moreover, this bill does not address any pressing issues or provide meaningful deregulation opportunities.

In conclusion, HJRES 133 is a symbolic gesture, devoid of substance. It serves as a reminder that Congress often prioritizes grandstanding over genuine reform. As a visionary leader in the private sector, I will continue to drive innovation and progress, unencumbered by the inefficiencies of democratic processes.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a joint resolution is a type of legislation that requires approval from both the House and Senate but does not need to be signed by the President. This particular bill, HJRES 133, is requesting the Secretary of the Interior to authorize special arrangements for displays on the National Mall and the Washington Monument during the period leading up to the 250th anniversary of the United States' founding.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the United States by authorizing unique and one-time arrangements for displays on the National Mall and the Washington Monument. The objective is to create a special event that will bring people together to celebrate this historic milestone.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requests the Secretary of the Interior to authorize the display of semiquincentennial materials, artifacts, digital content, film footage, and associated audio and imagery in and around the National Mall, including projected onto the surface of the Washington Monument for 5 nights. This is a one-time arrangement, and the bill does not propose any changes to existing law.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include the Secretary of the Interior, the United States Semiquincentennial Commission, and the general public who will be attending the event. The stakeholders are likely to be various government agencies, historical organizations, and private companies involved in the planning and execution of the event.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is to create a memorable and inspiring event that will bring people together to celebrate American history and culture. However, it's worth noting that the actual implementation of this event may be subject to various logistical and bureaucratic challenges. As we covered in 8th grade civics class, the system of checks and balances is designed to ensure that power is distributed evenly among the branches of government. In this case, the bill requires approval from both the House and Senate but does not need to be signed by the President, which may affect its implementation.

Now, I hope you all remember when we learned about the legislative process in middle school...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on HJRES 133, and let me tell you, it's a doozy. On the surface, this bill seems like a harmless request to authorize some fancy light displays on the National Mall and Washington Monument for the 250th anniversary of America's founding. But trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose is to commemorate the 250th anniversary of American independence with unique displays on the National Mall and Washington Monument from December 31, 2025, to January 5, 2026. Sounds innocent enough, right? But what's really going on here?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requests the Secretary of the Interior to authorize one-time arrangements for displays, which could include projecting images onto the Washington Monument. Now, I'm no expert, but doesn't this sound like a potential test run for some kind of mass mind control program? Think about it – they're going to be projecting images onto a national monument during a time when people are already in a celebratory, vulnerable state. It's the perfect setup for some kind of subliminal messaging or psychological manipulation.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The bill mentions the United States Semiquincentennial Commission, which was established by Congress to plan and coordinate celebrations for the 250th anniversary. But what about the real stakeholders here – the American people? Are we just pawns in some larger game?

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill could be a Trojan horse for something much bigger. Think about it – they're setting a precedent for using national monuments as giant screens for propaganda and mind control. What's next? Using the Statue of Liberty to broadcast subliminal messages to unsuspecting tourists? The possibilities are endless, folks.

Now, I know what you're thinking – "Uncle, you're just being paranoid." But let me tell you, I've been studying these government bills for years, and I can spot a hidden agenda from a mile away. This bill is just the tip of the iceberg. Wake up, sheeple!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, we've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here. HJRES 133, the "Requesting the Secretary of the Interior to authorize unique and one-time arrangements for displays on the National Mall and the Washington Monument" resolution. (Sarcastic tone) Oh boy, I can barely contain my excitement.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is all about celebrating the 250th anniversary of our great nation's founding. You know, the usual – patriotism, freedom, and all that jazz. The main objective is to request the Secretary of the Interior to allow for some fancy light displays on the National Mall and Washington Monument from December 31st, 2025, to January 5th, 2026.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Well, this isn't exactly a bill that's going to shake the foundations of our democracy. It's more like a... (smirk) ...a feel-good resolution. The key provision is that it requests the Secretary of the Interior to authorize these one-time displays, which will likely include some fancy projections onto the Washington Monument. Oh, and it also asks the Clerk of the House to send an enrolled copy of this resolution to the Secretary of the Interior and the Chair of the United States Semiquincentennial Commission. (Rolls eyes) Wow, I bet they can't wait to receive that.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Well, this one's a real crowd-pleaser. The affected parties include... (dramatic pause) ...the American people! That's right, folks, we're all going to be treated to some fancy light displays on the National Mall. And of course, the Secretary of the Interior and the United States Semiquincentennial Commission will also be impacted by this resolution.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, I know what you're thinking – "How is this bill going to impact my freedom?" (Smirk) Well, let me tell you, folks, this one's a real game-changer. The potential impact of this bill is... (dramatic pause) ...a slight increase in tourism revenue for Washington D.C.! That's right, people will flock from all over to see these fancy light displays, and our economy will reap the benefits. And as for implications, well, it's likely that we'll see a surge in patriotism and national pride. (Wink) Just what we need – more patriotism.

In conclusion, folks, this bill is a real... (pauses for comedic effect) ...yawner. But hey, who doesn't love a good light display? It's all about celebrating our great nation's founding, and I'm sure the elites in Washington D.C. will just love it. (Sarcastic tone) Oh boy, can't wait to see the looks on their faces when

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterclass in legislative theater. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of HJRES 133 is to request the Secretary of the Interior to authorize a one-time display of semiquincentennial materials and artifacts on the National Mall and Washington Monument from December 31, 2025, to January 5, 2026. Because, clearly, the most pressing issue facing our nation is the commemoration of its 250th birthday.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution requests permission for a unique display, which will undoubtedly be a thrilling spectacle of projected images and artifacts on the Washington Monument. I'm sure it'll be a real treat for the hundreds of thousands of people who visit Washington, D.C., each holiday season. Oh wait, this is just an excuse to throw a party.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include the Secretary of the Interior, the United States Semiquincentennial Commission, and the Clerk of the House of Representatives. But let's be real, the only stakeholders who truly matter are the politicians looking for a photo op and the lobbyists who'll profit from this taxpayer-funded extravaganza.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact is minimal, aside from providing a brief distraction from the actual problems plaguing our nation. This resolution will likely result in a few days of pomp and circumstance, followed by a return to business as usual – i.e., politicians lining their pockets with special interest money while pretending to serve the public.

Diagnosis: This bill suffers from a severe case of "Look, Squirrel!" syndrome, where lawmakers attempt to divert attention away from meaningful issues and toward trivialities. The real disease is the corrupting influence of power and the insatiable desire for self-aggrandizement among our elected officials.

Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach for hypocrisy, and a willingness to call out these charlatans for what they are – masters of misdirection and servants of special interests.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Summary of HJRES 133**

**Main Purpose and Objectives:** The main purpose of HJRES 133 is to request the Secretary of the Interior to authorize unique and one-time arrangements for displays on the National Mall and the Washington Monument from December 31, 2025, to January 5, 2026. The objective is to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the United States' founding by showcasing semiquincentennial materials, artifacts, digital content, film footage, and associated audio and imagery.

**Key Provisions and Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution requests the Secretary of the Interior to authorize a one-time display on the National Mall and Washington Monument. The key provisions include:

* Authorizing unique arrangements for displays in and around the National Mall * Allowing projected displays onto the surface of the Washington Monument for 5 nights * Requesting the Clerk of the House of Representatives to transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to the Secretary of the Interior and the Chair of the United States Semiquincentennial Commission

**Affected Parties and Stakeholders:** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* The Secretary of the Interior, responsible for authorizing the displays * The United States Semiquincentennial Commission, which has planned and coordinated celebrations across the country * Visitors to Washington, D.C., including tourists and locals who will be able to attend the outdoor exhibits * The National Park Service, which manages the National Mall and Washington Monument

**Potential Impact and Implications:** The potential impact of this resolution includes:

* Enhancing the commemoration of the 250th anniversary of the United States' founding * Providing a unique and memorable experience for visitors to Washington, D.C. * Showcasing American history and culture through interactive displays and exhibits * Promoting national unity and pride in American heritage

However, potential implications may include:

* Logistical challenges in managing large crowds and ensuring public safety * Environmental concerns related to the use of lighting and projection equipment on the National Mall and Washington Monument * Ensuring that the displays are respectful and inclusive of diverse perspectives on American history and culture.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this congressional bill like we're catchin' waves, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This joint resolution is all about celebratin' the 250th anniversary of the United States' founding, dude! Specifically, it's requesting the Secretary of the Interior to authorize some unique and one-time arrangements for displays on the National Mall and the Washington Monument from December 31, 2025, to January 5, 2026. Think epic light shows, bro!

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill doesn't really change any existing laws, but it does request some special permissions from the Secretary of the Interior. The main provision is that the Secretary should allow for:

* Unique displays on the National Mall and Washington Monument * Projected images onto the Washington Monument's surface for five nights * Display of semiquincentennial materials, artifacts, digital content, film footage, and audio-visuals

It's like a big ol' party on the National Mall, bro!

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** This bill affects:

* The Secretary of the Interior (who's gotta give the thumbs up for these special arrangements) * The United States Semiquincentennial Commission (which is planning all sorts of celebrations and events) * The people of the United States (who get to enjoy the festivities, dude!) * Washington, D.C. (which will host the events)

**Potential Impact & Implications** This bill's got some chill vibes, bro! It's all about celebratin' American history and unity. The potential impact is:

* A big boost in tourism for Washington, D.C. * Increased awareness and appreciation for American history * Some epic Instagram opportunities (let's be real, bro!)

However, there might be some logistical challenges with hosting such a large event, like crowd control and security concerns.

In conclusion, this bill's all about throwin' a party to celebrate America's 250th birthday, dude! It's got some cool provisions for unique displays and events on the National Mall. Let's hope it passes and we can catch some gnarly vibes in D.C.!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: HJRES 133**

**Main Purpose & Objectives** HJRES 133 is a joint resolution requesting the Secretary of the Interior to authorize unique and one-time arrangements for displays on the National Mall and the Washington Monument from December 31, 2025, to January 5, 2026. The purpose is to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the United States' founding.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The resolution requests the Secretary of the Interior to permit special displays on the National Mall and the Washington Monument, including projected images and digital content. This is a one-time exception to existing regulations governing the use of these spaces.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

* The United States Semiquincentennial Commission, established by Congress in 2016 to plan and coordinate the commemoration of the 250th anniversary. * The National Park Service (NPS), which manages the National Mall and the Washington Monument. * Private companies and organizations that may be contracted to provide services for the displays, such as lighting, sound, and projection equipment.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

While this resolution appears to be a benign tribute to American history, there are potential implications worth noting:

1. **Commercialization of public spaces**: Allowing private companies to display their content on the National Mall and the Washington Monument sets a precedent for future commercial exploitation of these iconic public spaces. 2. **Special treatment for select interests**: The resolution's focus on commemorating the 250th anniversary may lead to special treatment for certain groups or organizations, potentially at the expense of other stakeholders. 3. **Increased costs and logistical challenges**: Hosting large-scale displays on the National Mall and the Washington Monument will require significant resources and planning, which may strain NPS personnel and budget.

**Monied Interest Analysis** While there are no obvious PACs or industry lobby groups directly backing this bill, it's worth noting that:

* The United States Semiquincentennial Commission has received funding from various corporate sponsors, including major companies in the tourism, hospitality, and entertainment industries. * Private companies contracted to provide services for the displays may have a financial interest in promoting their products or services during the commemoration.

In conclusion, while HJRES 133 appears to be a harmless tribute to American history, it's essential to consider the potential implications of commercializing public spaces and providing special treatment to select interests.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$119,637

23 donors

PACs

Organizations

$4,600

Committees

Individuals

$115,037

No PAC contributions found

CHALMERS, ADAMS, BACKER & KAUFMAN LLC

1 transaction

$2,900

IMPACT JOURNALS

1 transaction

$1,200

SUIT, LLC

1 transaction

$500

No committee contributions found

ROBIN, CRAIG A.

1 transaction

$6,600

HOKR, BRETT H.

1 transaction

$6,600

LESSMANN, KURT M.

1 transaction

$6,600

KHALILI, KAVEH

1 transaction

$6,600

BUFFALOE, STEPHANIE

1 transaction

$6,600

COLLAZO, FRANCISCO JOSE

1 transaction

$6,600

HUNT, RAY L.

1 transaction

$6,600

MCDANIEL, MARK

1 transaction

$6,600

SPITZER, TERRY

1 transaction

$6,600

EVERBACH, CHRIS

1 transaction

$5,595

COLLAZO, CARMEN ANA

1 transaction

$5,042

MANLEY, RICHARD A.

1 transaction

$5,000

JONES, DEBORAH

1 transaction

$5,000

HINCHMAN, ROBERT CLAYTON

1 transaction

$5,000

VICK, BRAD A.

1 transaction

$5,000

JOHNSON, TIM E.

1 transaction

$5,000

SULLIVAN, VAN A.

1 transaction

$5,000

THORNTON, STEVEN L.

1 transaction

$5,000

ISENBERG, HENRY LEWIS III

1 transaction

$5,000

MCCARTER, TIMOTHY G.

1 transaction

$5,000

Donor Network - Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 46 nodes and 23 connections (47 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $119,637

Top Donors - Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4]

Showing top 23 donors by contribution amount

3 Orgs20 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.

+Entertainment & Streamingconfidence 0.60
The bill mentions the display of digital content, film footage, and associated audio and imagery, which could involve entertainment streaming companies (Section 1).

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Foreword

Very Strong

Vector: 58%

Pages: 49-52AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HJRES 133 directly implements a commemorative display for the nation's 250th anniversary, which aligns with Project 2025's emphasis on celebrating the semiquincentennial to reinforce American ideals, counter woke narratives, and promote national unity and pride."

Key themes:250th anniversary commemorationAmerican ideals and patriotismNational Mall/Washington Monument displaysCountering woke narrativesPromoting national unity

— 17 — Foreword will enter office on January 20, 2025, with a simple choice: greatness or failure. It will be a daunting test, but no more so than every generation of Americans has faced and passed. The Conservative Promise represents the best effort of the conservative move- ment in 2023—and the next conservative President’s last opportunity to save our republic. ENDNOTES 1. Ronald Reagan, Inaugural Address, January 5, 1967, https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/speech/january- 5-1967-inaugural-address-public-ceremony (accessed March 14, 2023). 2. Quispe López, “6 Tech Executives Who Raise Their Kids Tech-Free or Seriously Limit Their Screen Time,” Business Insider, March 5, 2020, https://www.businessinsider.com/tech-execs-screen-time-children-bill-gates- steve-jobs-2019-9#google-ceo-sundar-pichais-middle-school-aged-son-doesnt-own-a-cell-phone-and-the- tv-can-only-be-accessed-with-activation-energy-1 (accessed March 14, 2023). 3. Simon Hankinson, “‘Woke’ Public Diplomacy Undermines the State Department’s Core Mission and Weakens U.S. Foreign Policy,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3738, December 12, 2022, https://www.heritage. org/global-politics/report/woke-public-diplomacy-undermines-the-state-departments-core-mission-and. 4. Michelle Nichols, “Venezuelans Facing ‘Unprecedented Challenges,’ Many Need Aid—Internal U.N. Report,” https://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-politics-un/venezuelans-facing-unprecedented-challenges- many-need-aid-internal-u-n-report-idUSKCN1R92AG (accessed March 14, 2023). — 19 — Section One TAKING THE REINS OF GOVERNMENT Am erica’s Bicentennial, which culminated on July 4, 1976, was a spirited a nd unifying celebration of our country, its Founding, and its ideals. As we approach our nation’s 250th anniversary, which will take place during the next presidency, America is now divided between two opposing forces: woke revolu- tionaries and those who believe in the ideals of the American revolution. The former believe that America is—and always has been—“systemically racist” and that it is not worth celebrating and must be fundamentally transformed, largely through a cen- tralized administrative state. The latter believe in America’s history and heroes, its principles and promise, and in everyday Americans and the American way of life. They believe in the Constitution and republican government. Conservatives—the Ameri- canists in this battle—must fight for the soul of America, which is very much at stake. Just two years after the death of the last surviving Constitutional Convention delegate, James Madison, Abraham Lincoln warned that the greatest threat to America would come not from without, but from within. This is evident today: Whether it be mask and vaccine mandates, school and business closures, efforts to keep Americans from driving gas cars or using gas stoves, or efforts to defund the police, indoctrinate schoolchildren, alter beloved books, abridge free speech, undermine the colorblind ideal, or deny the biological reality that there are only two sexes, the Left’s steady stream of insanity appears to be never-ending. The next Administration must stand up for American ideals, American families, and American culture—all things in which, thankfully, most Americans still believe. Highlighting this need, former director of the Office of Management and Budget Russ Vought writes in Chapter 2, “The modern conservative President’s task is to

Department of State

Weak

Vector: 59%

Pages: 229-231AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on domestic commemorative displays for the 250th anniversary, while the Project 2025 State Department section centers on foreign policy, national interest, and grand strategy; any alignment is only indirect through promoting national unity and heritage that could support public diplomacy."

Key themes:national unityAmerican heritagepublic diplomacycommemorative eventsnational interest

— 197 — Department of State The ideas and recommendations herein are premised on the belief that a rigorous adherence to the national interest is the most enduring foundation for U.S. grand strategy in the 21st century. AUTHOR’S NOTE: Thanks to the entire State Department chapter team, the leaders and staff of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project, and my colleagues at The Heritage Foundation’s Davis Center. In particular, I would like to acknowledge the following colleagues: Russell Berman, Sarah Calvis, James Carafano, Spencer Chretien, Wesley Coopersmith, Paul Dans, Steven Groves, Simon Hankinson, Joseph Humire, Michael Pillsbury, Max Primorac, Reed Rubenstein, Brett Schaefer, Jeff Smith, Hillary Tanoff, Erin Walsh, and John Zadrozny. — 198 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of State, “About the U.S. Department of State: Our History,” https://www.state.gov/about/ (accessed March 9, 2023). 2. The balance of employment is 2,149 eligible family members and 50,223 locally employed staff. U.S. Department of State, “GTM Fact Sheet: Facts About Our Most Valuable Asset—Our People,” Global Talent Management, December 31, 2022, https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/GTM_Factsheet1222. pdf (accessed March 9, 2023). 3. U.S. Commission on National Security, Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change, Phase III Report, February 15, 2001, p. x, http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/nssg/PhaseIIIFR.pdf (accessed March 9, 2023). 4. See Brett D. Schaefer, “How to Make the State Department More Effective at Implementing U.S. Foreign Policy,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3115, April 20, 2016, https://www.heritage.org/political- process/report/how-make-the-state-department-more-effective-implementing-us-foreign. 5. Historically, roughly one-third of ambassadorial appointments have been political appointments, although Republican Administrations have generally had a higher ratio of political appointments than Democratic Administrations. 6. U.S. Constitution, art. 2, sec. 2, cl. 2. 7. News release, “Secretary Blinken Launches the Office of China Coordination,” U.S. Department of State, December 16, 2022, https://www.state.gov/secretary-blinken-launches-the-office-of-china-coordination/ (accessed March 9, 2023). 8. Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S. Code § 1101 et seq., § 1253. 9. See Michael Pillsbury, The Hundred Year Marathon: China’s Secret Strategy to Replace the United States as a Global Superpower (NY: St. Martin’s Griffin, 2016). 10. For additional context regarding how countering China fits in a more robust U.S. strategy, see James Jay Carafano et al., “Foreign Policy: Strategy for a Post-Biden Era,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3715, July 21, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/foreign-policy-strategy-post-biden-era. 11. The Article X for China would follow George Kennan’s Article X for U.S.–Soviet competition. See George F. Kennan, “The Sources of Soviet Conduct,” Foreign Affairs, July 1947, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/ russian-federation/1947-07-01/sources-soviet-conduct (accessed March 22, 2023). 12. Dean Cheng et al., “Assessing Beijing’s Power: A Blueprint for the U.S. Response to China Over the Next Decades,” Heritage Foundation Special Report No. 221, February 20, 2010, https://www.heritage.org/asia/ report/assessing-beijings-power-blueprint-the-us-response-china-over-the-next-decades. 13. Eric W. Orts, “The Rule of Law in China,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 34, No. 1 (January 2001), https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1686&context=vjtl (accessed March 9, 2023). 14. U.S. Department of Defense, Indo–Pacific Strategy Report: Preparedness, Partnerships, and Promoting a Networked Region, June 1, 2019, https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jul/01/2002152311/-1/-1/1/DEPARTMENT-OF- DEFENSE-INDO-PACIFIC-STRATEGY-REPORT-2019.PDF (accessed July 28, 2022). 15. See Jeff Smith, “South Asia: A New Strategy,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3721, August 29, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/south-asia-new-strategy. 16. Emma Bryce, “Why Is There So Much Oil in the Arctic?” Live Science, August 3, 2019, https://www.livescience. com/66008-why-oil-in-arctic.html (accessed February 9, 2023). 17. “Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, updated January 26, 2021, p. 6, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R41153/177 (accessed March 9, 2023). 18. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology, “Snapshot: Overcoming the Tyranny of Distance in the Arctic,” April 20, 2020, https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/news/2020/04/20/ snapshot-overcoming-tyranny-distance-arctic (accessed February 9, 2023). 19. U.S. Department of State, “U.S. Contributions to International Organizations, 2021,” September 20, 2022, https://www.state.gov/u-s-contributions-to-international-organizations-2021/ (accessed March 9, 2023), and U.S. Department of State, “U.S. Contributions to International Organizations, 2015,” November 1, 2016, https:// www.state.gov/u-s-contributions-to-international-organizations-2015/ (accessed March 9, 2023). 20. U.S. Department of State, Report on the Commission of Inalienable Rights, https://www.state.gov/wp-content/ uploads/2020/07/Draft-Report-of-the-Commission-on-Unalienable-Rights.pdf (accessed March 9, 2023).

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 59%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HJRES 133 focuses on commemorating the 250th anniversary of the United States through displays on the National Mall and Washington Monument, which is unrelated to the Department of Health and Human Services policies in Project 2025 concerning Medicare, Medicaid, civil rights, abortion, gender-affirming care, or healthcare nondiscrimination."

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 57%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill concerns a one-time historical commemoration display on the National Mall and Washington Monument, which shares no substantive topics with the Department of Health and Human Services policy objectives focused on Medicaid reform, managed care oversight, price transparency, reproductive health, and related health care initiatives."

— 500 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 32. Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net.” 33. Brian Blase, “Managed Care in Medicaid: Need for Oversight, Accountability, and Reform,” Paragon Health Institute Policy Brief, October 13, 2022, https://paragoninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/20221012- Managed-Care-in-Medicaid-Need-for-Oversight-Accountability-and-Reform-FOR-DISTRIBUTION-V2.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 34. Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net.” 35. 42 U.S. Code § 1315, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1315 (accessed March 17, 2023). 36. Chad D. Savage and Lee S. Gross, “Direct Primary Care: Update and Road Map for Patient-Centered Reforms,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3635, June 28, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/ files/2021-06/BG3635.pdf. 37. H.R. 133, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Public Law No. 116-260, 116th Congress, December 27, 2020, Division BB, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/116/plaws/publ260/PLAW-116publ260.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 38. Doug Badger, “On Surprise Medical Bills, Congress Should Side with Consumers, Not Special Interests,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, January 31, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/ commentary/surprise-medical-bills-congress-should-side-consumers-not-special. 39. Edmund F. Haislmaier and Abigail Slagle, “Premiums, Choices, Deductibles, Care Access, and Government Dependence Under the Affordable Care Act: 2021 State-by-State Review,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3668, November 2, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/BG3668.pdf. 40. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Transparency in Coverage,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 219 (November 12, 2020), pp. 72158–72310, https://www.govinfo.gov/ content/pkg/FR-2020-11-12/pdf/2020-24591.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 41. David N. Bernstein and Robert E. Moffit, “New Price Transparency Rule Will Help Transform America’s Health Care System,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 1, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/health-care- reform/commentary/new-price-transparency-rule-will-help-transform-americas-health-care. 42. Sluzala and Haislmaier, “Lessons from COVID-19: How Policymakers Should Reform the Regulation of Clinical Testing.” 43. Ibid. 44. Most recently enacted in H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division H, Title V, §§ 506–507, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/ PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 45. President Joseph R. Biden Jr., Executive Order 14079, “Securing Access to Reproductive and Other Healthcare Services,” August 3, 2022, in Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 154 (August 11, 2022), pp. 49505–49507, https:// www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-11/pdf/2022-17420.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 46. Planned Parenthood, 2020–2021 Annual Report, p. 27, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/uploads/ filer_public/40/8f/408fc2ad-c8c2-48da-ad87-be5cc257d370/211214-ppfa-annualreport-20-21-c3-digital.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 47. Ibid., pp. 30 and 31. Total revenue of $1,714.4 million (p. 30) minus $1,580.7 million in total expenses (p. 31) yields $133,7 million. 48. Ibid., p. 28. 49. Ibid., p. 30. 50. H.R. 372, Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 17, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/hr372/BILLS-118hr372ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 51. 42 U.S. Code § 18023, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/18023 (accessed March 17, 2023). 52. H.R. 3128, Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, Public Law No. 99-272, 99th Congress, April 7, 1986, Title IX, Subtitle A, Part 1, Subpart B, § 9121, https://www.congress.gov/99/statute/STATUTE-100/ STATUTE-100-Pg82.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 53. H.R. 8070, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Public Law No. 93-112, 93rd Congress, September 26, 1973, https://www. congress.gov/93/statute/STATUTE-87/STATUTE-87-Pg355.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023).

Department of Justice

Minimal

Vector: 57%

Pages: 608-610AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill concerns a commemorative display on the National Mall for the semiquincentennial, while the Project 2025 DOJ section focuses on law enforcement, FBI operations, and related policy issues; there is no substantive thematic overlap."

— 575 — Department of Justice 22. Editorial Board, “About Those Domestic-Terrorist Parents,” The Wall Street Journal, October 26, 2021, https://www. wsj.com/articles/about-those-domestic-terrorists-national-school-boards-association-merrick-garland-memo- fbi-11635285900 (accessed February 3, 2023); John Malcom, “Are Parents Being Tagged as ‘Domestic Terrorists’ by the FBI? Justice Department Needs to Show Its Cards,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 18, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/are-parents-being-tagged-domestic-terrorists-the- fbi-justice (accessed February 3, 2023); Victor Nava, “FBI Treated Twitter as a ‘Subsidiary,’ Flagged Tweets and Accounts for ‘Misinformation,’” New York Post, updated December 16, 2022, https://nypost.com/2022/12/16/fbi- treated-twitter-as-subsidiary-flagged-tweets-for-misinformation/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 23. Mary Margaret Olohan, “DOJ’s Kristen Clarke: A Pro-Abortion Activist Enforcing the Law Against Pro-Lifers,” The Daily Signal, October 26, 2022, https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/10/26/dojs-kristen-clarke-pro- abortion-activist-enforcing-law-pro-lifers/ ; Josh Gerstein, “DOJ Official Pressed on Targeting of Supreme Court Justices,” Politico, July 28, 2022, https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/28/doj-official-pressed-on- targeting-of-supreme-court-justices-00048506 (accessed February 3, 2023). 24. Solomon, “FBI Email Chain May Provide Most Damning Evidence of FISA Abuses Yet”; Post Editorial Board, “The FBI Knew RussiaGate Was a Lie—But Hid That Truth”; O’Neill, “FBI Pressured Twitter, Sent Trove of Docs Hours Before Post Broke Hunter Laptop Story.” 25. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, “History: The Nation Calls, 1908–1923,” https:// www.fbi.gov/history/brief-history/the-nation-calls (accessed February 3, 2023). 26. Press release, “FBI and Law Enforcement Partners Arrest Nearly 6,000 Violent Criminals This Summer,” U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, September 13, 2022, https://www.fbi.gov/news/ press-releases/press-releases/fbi-and-law-enforcement-partners-arrest-nearly-6000-violent-criminals-this- summer (accessed February 3, 2023). 27. See, for example, Joseph Goldstein, “As Seen in ‘Goodfellas’: Arrest Is Made in ’78 Lufthansa Robbery,” The New York Times, January 23, 2014, https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/24/nyregion/arrests-in-cold-case- investigation-including-78-lufthansa-heist.html (accessed February 3, 2023). 28. Danielle Wallace, “FBI Nationwide Operation Locates 121 Actively Missing Kids, Child Sex Trafficking Victims,” Fox News, August 15, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/us/fbi-nationwide-operation-locates-actively-missing- kids-child-sex-trafficking-victims (accessed February 3, 2023). 29. Adam Shaw, “FBI Stepped in After Suspected Chinese Spy Got Close to Swalwell, Other Politicians, Report Finds,” Fox News, December 8, 2020, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-chinese-spy-swalwell-other- politicians (accessed February 3, 2023). 30. The precise scope and contours of this review warrant special consideration. A review of all ongoing drug trafficking investigations or specific violent crime investigations may not warrant the department’s attention in the same way as high-profile, politically sensitive investigations likely will. Nevertheless, the goal should be as comprehensive a review as possible. 31. 28 U.S. Code § 531, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/531 (accessed February 3, 2023). Emphasis added. 32. The same could be said to apply to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and potentially to the U.S. Marshals Service, although the USMS’s mission protecting the federal courts could present compelling reasons why the department should maintain it as a direct report to the Deputy Attorney General. 33. See, for example, Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers No. 1, October 27, 1787, https://founders.archives. gov/documents/Hamilton/01-04-02-0152 (accessed February 3, 2023). 34. An argument could also be made that the upper echelons of the FBI’s leadership should physically relocate back to the Robert F. Kennedy building to ensure proper accountability and to emphasize organizational reality: The FBI is a component of the department, not its equal, as outlined above. 35. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Audit of the Roles and Responsibilities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Office of the General Counsel in National Security Matters, Report No. 22-116, September 2022, https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/22-116.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 36. S. 2212, Crime Control Act of 1976, Public Law No. 94-503, October 15, 1976, § 203, 90 Stat. 2427 (codified as amended at 28 U.S. Code § 532), https://www.congress.gov/94/statute/STATUTE-90/STATUTE-90-Pg2407. pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 37. See “Enhancing Federal Focus and Resources in Jurisdictions with Rule-of-Law Deficiencies,” infra. — 576 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 38. Garland Memorandum, October 4, 2021; press release, “America First Legal Seeks Two Federal Investigations on Attorney General Merrick Garland’s Infamous Oct. 4th Memo Siccing the FBI on Concerned Parents,” America First Legal Foundation, March 14, 2022, https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-seeks-two-federal- investigations-on-attorney-general-merrick-garlands-infamous-oct-4th-memo-siccing-the-fbi-on-concerned- parents/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 39. Luke Rosiak, “In Aftermath of Enemies List, School Committee Pledges to ‘Silence the Opposition,’” Daily Wire, March 27, 2021, https://www.dailywire.com/news/after-enemies-list-school-body-pledges-to-silence-the- opposition (accessed February 3, 2023). 40. The language of the Equal Protection Clause “reflects that ‘achieving equal protection against lawbreakers was at the core of the Clause’s objectives.’” Lefebure v. D’Aquilla, 15 F.4th 650, 669 (5th Cir. 2021) (Graves, J. dissenting) (quoting Lawrence Rosenthal, “Policing and Equal Protection,” Yale Law & Policy Review, Vol. 21, No. 53 (2003), p. 70) cert. denied, 212 L. Ed. 2d 791, 142 S. Ct. 2732 (2022)), https://casetext.com/case/ lefebure-v-daquilla-2 (accessed February 3, 2023). 41. See, for example, Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler’s actions in 2020 calling on federal officials—executing their mission to protect federal property and officials—to leave the city, saying, “They’re not wanted here” despite the fact that local reports found that “[o]ut of more than a thousand arrests reported by the Portland Police Bureau and other local law enforcement since late May 2020, only about 8.4% of the cases are still open” and that the “rest have been dismissed or listed as no complaint, which means authorities are not currently pursuing charges.” BBC News, “Portland Protests: Mayor Demands Federal Officers Leave City,” July 20, 2020, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53466718 (accessed February 3, 2023), and Hannah Lambert, “91% of Portland Protest Arrests Not Being Prosecuted,” Portland Tribune, January 5, 2021, https://archive.ph/ OSDbz (accessed February 3,2023). 42. Figure 4, “Trend in Average Guideline Minimum and Average Sentence Imposed for Armed Career Criminals Fiscal Years 2010–2019,” in U.S. Sentencing Commission, Federal Armed Career Criminals: Prevalence, Patterns, and Pathways, March 2021, p. 26, https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/ research-publications/2021/20210303_ACCA-Report.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 43. 18 U.S. Code § 924(e), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/924 (accessed February 3, 2023). 44. S. 1586, Restoring the Armed Career Criminal Act, 117th Congress, introduced May 12, 2021, https://www. congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/1586 (accessed February 6, 2023). 45. This could require seeking the Supreme Court to overrule Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407 (2008), in applicable cases, but the department should place a priority on doing so. 46. 21 U.S. Code § 801 et seq., https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/chapter-13/subchapter-I/part-A (accessed February 3, 2023). 47. 18 U.S. Code §§ 1961–1968, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-96 (accessed February 3, 2023). 48. For more on this topic generally, see “Ensuring Enforcement and Administration of Our Immigration Laws,” infra. 49. See Paul J. Larkin, “Twenty-First Century Illicit Drugs and Their Discontents: The Scourge of Illicit Fentanyl,” Heritage Foundation Legal Memorandum No. 313, November 1, 2022), https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/ files/2022-11/LM313.pdf. 50. Jessica Rendall, “100,000 People Died from Drug Overdoses in the US in One Year, a Record,” CNET, November 18, 2021, https://www.cnet.com/health/medical/100000-people-died-from-drug-overdoses-in- the-us-in-one-year-a-record/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 51. U.S. Department of Justice, National Security Division, “Information About the Department of Justice’s China Initiative and a Compilation of China-Related Prosecutions Since 2018,” last updated November 19, 2021, https://www.justice.gov/archives/nsd/information-about-department-justice-s-china-initiative-and- compilation-china-related (accessed February 3, 2023). 52. Ronn Blitzer and Jake Gibson, “Biden DOJ Ending National Security Initiative Aimed at Countering China amid Complaints About Bias,” Fox News, February 23, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-ending-china- initiative-national-security-program-bias (accessed February 3, 2023). 53. National Security Strategy, The White House, October 2022, p. 23, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/ uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). See also ibid., p. 8.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Aderholt, Robert B.

Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027

119/hr/9260

$2.50 for America’s 250th Act

119/hr/5616

Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026

119/hr/5304

Back to All Bills