Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4]
ID: A000055
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 604.
June 10, 2026
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this monstrosity, shall we?
The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations Act for 2027 is a $2.6 billion behemoth, because who needs fiscal responsibility when you can just throw money at problems? The bill allocates funds to various programs, including the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) and the National Apprenticeship Act, because God forbid we actually fix the underlying issues with our education system.
The WIOA gets a whopping $1.8 billion for adult employment and training activities, as well as dislocated worker employment and training activities. Because, you know, throwing money at people who lost their jobs will definitely solve the problem of a stagnant economy. And let's not forget the $794 million for national programs, including $325 million for the dislocated workers assistance national reserve, because we all know that's exactly what we need – more bureaucratic red tape.
Notable increases include a $135 million allocation for training and employment assistance under sections 168(b), 169(c), and 170 of the WIOA. Because, clearly, the previous funding wasn't enough to solve the problem, so let's just throw more money at it. And who cares about the fiscal impact? We'll just add it to the deficit, because what's another few billion dollars among friends?
The riders attached to this bill are a special kind of ridiculous. For example, outlying areas can now submit a single application for a consolidated grant, which will undoubtedly lead to more efficient use of funds (said no one ever). And let's not forget the provision allowing the Secretary of Labor to reserve up to 10% of funds for "technical assistance and additional activities related to the transition to the WIOA." Because, you know, that's exactly what we need – more bureaucratic busywork.
In conclusion, this bill is a symptom of a deeper disease: the inability of our elected officials to make tough decisions and actually fix problems. Instead, they'd rather throw money at issues, hoping to buy their way out of accountability. The fiscal impact? Who cares? We'll just add it to the deficit and pretend it's not a problem. After all, what's a few trillion dollars among friends?
Diagnosis: Terminal stupidity, with a side of corruption and greed. Prognosis: Poor. Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism and a strong stomach, because this bill is going to make you want to vomit.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Donor Network - Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 24 nodes and 23 connections
Total contributions: $119,637
Top Donors - Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4]
Showing top 23 donors by contribution amount
Industry Impact
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 17 helped,2 harmed.
- +Hospitals & Health Systems confidence 0.95
Title II includes substantial funding for Medicaid ($468.6B), Medicare trust funds ($686.8B), HRSA programs (e.g., $1.8B for primary health care), and hospital-specific provisions like $100M for payments to eligible hospitals with <50 beds and wage index <0.90 (rural health flexibility grants).
- +Labor Unions confidence 0.90
Title I includes funding for workforce development programs under WIOA and National Apprenticeship Act, which support union apprenticeship programs and labor training initiatives (e.g., Sec. 106 allows transfers for technical assistance to grantees, and Sec. 112 provides up to $450,000 of excess personal property for apprenticeship programs).
- +Health Insurance confidence 0.90
Title II funds CMS programs including Medicaid and Medicare, which directly reimburse private health insurers through Medicare Advantage and managed care arrangements; Sec. 226 allows transfers to support Medicare program management.
- +Pharmaceuticals confidence 0.90
Title II funds NIH ($2.3B for NIDDK, $2.86B for NINDS, etc.) and CDC vaccine programs, supporting pharmaceutical R&D; Sec. 237 rescinds $2B from Nonrecurring Expenses Fund but overall funding levels remain high for drug development.
- +Real Estate confidence 0.90
Section 204 of Title II provides that 2.5% of amounts appropriated for programs authorized under section 241 of the PHS Act shall be made available for evaluation of such programs, which could benefit real estate firms involved in healthcare facility construction or renovation projects funded through these evaluations.
- +Teachers Unions confidence 0.85
Title III funds education programs including Title I grants for disadvantaged students and special education (IDEA), which benefit public school systems and thus teachers unions through increased funding for school operations and staff.
+ 13 more industries not shown.
Who funds the sponsor on these industries
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4]) received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
Industries this bill HELPS
- from 2contributions
- SMITH, WAYNE T.$2,000
Project 2025 Policy Matches
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.
Introduction
AI Analysis:
"The bill and Project 2025 policy are tangentially related through their focus on education and workforce development, but the bill's emphasis on increased funding and bureaucratic measures contrasts with the policy's goals of reducing spending and eliminating programs. The alignment is weak due to these differing approaches."
— 360 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise CHART 4 U.S. Department of Education, Total Appropriations IN BILLIONS OF DOLLARS $120 $100 $95.5 $80 $60 $40 $20 $14 $0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 NOTE: Totals include mandatory and discretionary appropriations. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, “Budget History Tables,” Education Department Budget History Table, https://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/history/index.html (accessed March 17, 2023). A heritage.org savings. The proposal would immediately save more than $17 billion annually in various programs. Savings over a decade would be far more robust, as the revenue responsibility for many formula grant programs would be returned to the states. Some highlights include: l Eliminate competitive grant programs and reduce spending on formula grant programs. Competitive grant programs operated by the Department of Education should be eliminated, and federal spending should be reduced to reflect remaining formula grant programs authorized under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) and the handful of other programs that do not fall under the competitive/ project grant category. Remaining programs managed by the Department — 361 — Department of Education of Education, such as large formula grant programs for K–12 education, should be reduced by 10 percent. This would cut approximately 29 programs, most of which are discretionary spending. In total, this would generate approximately $8.8 billion in savings. l Eliminate the PLUS loan program. As mentioned above, the PLUS loan program, which provides graduate student loans and loans to the parents of undergraduate students, should be eliminated. This would generate an estimated $2.3 billion in savings. l End time-based and occupation-based student loan forgiveness. A low estimate suggests ending current student loan forgiveness schemes would save taxpayers $370 billion. l Eliminate GEAR-UP. It is not the responsibility of the federal government to provide taxpayer dollars to create a pipeline from high school to college. GEAR UP should be eliminated, and its functions should instead be handled privately or at the state and local levels, where policymakers are better equipped to increase college preparedness within their school districts. Personnel The Department of Education currently employs approximately 4,400 indi- viduals. As programs are eliminated or transferred to other agencies, those employees whose positions are determined to be essential to the mission would move with their constituent programs. Current salaries and expenses at ED total $2.2 billion annually. AUTHOR’S NOTE: The preparation of this chapter was a collective enterprise of individuals involved in the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. All contributors to this chapter are listed at the front of this volume, but Jonathan Butcher, Bob Eitel, Jim Blew, Diane Auer Jones, Erin Valdez, Andrew Gillen, and Max Eden deserve special mention. The author alone assumes responsibility for the content of this chapter, and no views expressed herein should be attributed to any other individual.
About These Correlations
Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.
Related Bills
Other Bills by Rep. Aderholt, Robert B.
Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026
119/hr/5304
$2.50 for America’s 250th Act
119/hr/5616
Requesting the Secretary of the Interior to authorize unique and one-time arrangements for displays on the National Mall and the Washington Monument during the period beginning on December 31, 2025, and ending on January 5, 2026.
119/hjres/133
Similar Topics
To establish a competitive grant program to support out-of-school-time youth workforce readiness programs, providing employability skills development, career exploration, employment readiness training, mentoring, work-based learning, and workforce opportunities for eligible youth.
Total Force Family Education Act
Military Learning for Credit Act of 2025