Cyber PIVOTT Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/1000

Last Updated: September 8, 2025

Cyber PIVOTT Act

HR. 1000, 119th Congress — read as touching Cybersecurity.

The sponsor

Rep. Green, Mark E. [R-TN-7]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$110,814 raised

20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Homeland Security" section, p. 201-204 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mrs. Biggs (SC) asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1000, a bill originally introduced by Representative Green (TN), for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.

September 7, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Cyber PIVOTT Act (HR 1000) Analysis**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect the Cyber PIVOTT Act, a bill that attempts to bolster cybersecurity education and training programs. My focus will be on the wealth and power implications of this legislation.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Cyber PIVOTT Act aims to establish education and training programs for community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions offering two-year programs in cybersecurity. The primary objective is to create a skills-based cyber workforce through partnerships between these institutions and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill introduces the "Providing Individuals Various Opportunities for Technical Training to Build a Skills-Based Cyber Workforce Program" (PIVOTT Program). Key provisions include:

* Expanding education and training programs to community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions * Establishing partnerships between CISA and participating institutions * Providing full tuition scholarships to students participating in the program * Requiring a two-year service obligation for students who complete the program

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders are:

* Community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions offering two-year programs in cybersecurity * Students participating in the PIVOTT Program * CISA and the Department of Homeland Security * Federal, State, local, Tribal, or territorial governments seeking to advance their cyber mission

**Potential Impact & Implications:** From a wealth and power perspective, this bill has both positive and negative implications:

* Positive: + The PIVOTT Program may create a more skilled cybersecurity workforce, which could benefit my companies and investments in the tech sector. + The partnerships between CISA and participating institutions could lead to new business opportunities and revenue streams for my companies. * Negative: + The service obligation requirement may limit the pool of talent available for private sector companies like mine, as students will be required to fulfill a two-year service obligation with government agencies. + The bill's focus on community colleges and technical schools may divert resources away from more innovative and efficient approaches to cybersecurity education, such as online training programs or vocational schools.

In conclusion, the Cyber PIVOTT Act has both potential benefits and drawbacks for my business interests. While it may create a more skilled workforce and new business opportunities, it also poses risks by limiting talent availability and potentially diverting resources away from more innovative solutions. As a thought leader, I will continue to monitor this bill's progress and advocate for policies that prioritize innovation, efficiency, and the interests of visionary entrepreneurs like myself.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through the legislative process before it can become a law. This one, HR 1000, is titled the Cyber PIVOTT Act.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide education and training programs for cybersecurity professionals. The objective is to establish partnerships between the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions offering two-year programs to create a skills-based cyber workforce.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill creates a new program called the Providing Individuals Various Opportunities for Technical Training to Build a Skills-Based Cyber Workforce Program (PIVOTT Program). This program will provide full tuition scholarships to students enrolled in participating institutions, as well as internship and post-graduation federal job opportunities. The program also includes a service obligation, requiring students who complete the program to work in a cyber role for two years.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* Students enrolled in participating institutions * Community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions offering two-year programs * CISA and the Department of Homeland Security * Federal agencies and state, local, tribal, or territorial governments

**Potential Impact & Implications:** If passed, this bill could lead to an increase in cybersecurity professionals with specialized skills, which could improve national security. However, it's worth noting that the service obligation may limit the flexibility of students who participate in the program. Additionally, the bill's focus on community colleges and technical schools may overlook other institutions that offer relevant programs.

Remember when we learned about how a bill becomes a law? This one has just been introduced in the House of Representatives and will need to go through committee review, markup, and voting before it can move forward. As I always say, "the legislative process is like a game of telephone – it's not always clear what comes out the other end."

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on HR 1000, the Cyber PIVOTT Act. Now, at first glance, this bill seems like a harmless attempt to boost cybersecurity education and training programs. But trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose of this bill is to provide education and training programs for community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions offering two-year programs in cybersecurity. The goal is to build a skills-based cyber workforce, which sounds great on paper. However, I believe there's an ulterior motive at play.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes the "Providing Individuals Various Opportunities for Technical Training to Build a Skills-Based Cyber Workforce Program" (PIVOTT Program). This program will provide full tuition scholarships, including academic fees and other expenses, to students participating in cybersecurity education and training programs. The catch? These students will be required to fulfill a two-year service obligation in a cyber role within the federal government or state, local, tribal, or territorial governments.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions offering two-year programs in cybersecurity. Students participating in the PIVOTT Program will also be impacted, as they'll be required to fulfill a service obligation after completing their education. But here's the thing: I believe this bill is actually targeting a specific demographic – young adults who are eager to enter the workforce but may not have the financial means to do so.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, on the surface, this bill seems like a great way to address the cybersecurity skills gap. But think about it: by providing full tuition scholarships and requiring students to fulfill a service obligation, the government is essentially creating a pipeline of young, talented individuals who will be beholden to them for two years. This raises serious questions about the potential for exploitation and manipulation.

Furthermore, I believe this bill is part of a larger agenda to create a centralized, government-controlled cybersecurity workforce. Think about it: by providing education and training programs that are aligned with the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) Cybersecurity Workforce Framework, the government is essentially dictating what skills are valuable and what roles are necessary. This could lead to a homogenization of the cybersecurity industry, where individuals are forced to conform to a narrow set of standards rather than being encouraged to innovate and think outside the box.

So, there you have it – my analysis of HR 1000, the Cyber PIVOTT Act. It's not just about education and training programs; it's about creating a government-controlled pipeline of cybersecurity talent that can be leveraged for their own purposes. Wake up, sheeple!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath, with a hint of sarcasm) Oh boy, folks, we've got another "groundbreaking" bill on our hands! The Cyber PIVOTT Act, or HR 1000, is supposed to revolutionize the way we approach cybersecurity education and training. (Wink, wink)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to provide education and training programs for community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions of higher education offering two-year programs in cyber-related fields. The goal is to create a skills-based cyber workforce that can fill the gaps in our nation's cybersecurity needs. (Sounds great on paper, doesn't it?)

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 by adding new sections related to education and training programs for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). The key provisions include:

* Establishing partnerships between CISA and participating institutions to create education and training programs * Providing full tuition scholarships, including academic fees, lab fees, travel, lodging, per diem, stipends, internship costs, and other expenses necessary for students to complete the program * Requiring a two-year service obligation in a cyber role or cyber-relevant role after completing the program

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The bill affects various stakeholders, including:

* Community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions of higher education offering two-year programs in cyber-related fields * Students enrolled in these programs, who will receive scholarships and training opportunities * CISA, which will oversee the partnerships and provide resources for the program * Federal, State, local, Tribal, or territorial governments, which will benefit from a more skilled cyber workforce

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, here's where things get interesting. (Smirk) On the surface, this bill seems like a great way to address our nation's cybersecurity needs. However, we all know that nothing is ever as simple as it seems in Washington.

The potential impact of this bill could be significant, with more skilled cyber professionals entering the workforce. But let's not forget about the service obligation requirement. (Raising an eyebrow) Will students really want to commit to two years of government work after completing their education? And what about the potential for bureaucratic red tape and inefficiencies in implementing these programs?

Folks, this is just another example of how our "elites" in Washington think they can solve complex problems with more government intervention. (Scoffs) But hey, at least it's a step in the right direction... or so they'd like you to believe.

Stay vigilant, America! We'll be keeping an eye on this bill and all its implications for our freedom-loving nation.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the underlying disease.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Cyber PIVOTT Act (HR 1000) claims to provide education and training programs for community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions offering two-year cyber-related degree programs or certifications. The stated goal is to build a skills-based cyber workforce. How quaint. In reality, this bill is a thinly veiled attempt to funnel taxpayer money into the pockets of favored educational institutions and cybersecurity contractors.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill creates the Providing Individuals Various Opportunities for Technical Training to Build a Skills-Based Cyber Workforce Program (PIVOTT Program). It allows the Director of CISA to partner with participating institutions, offering full tuition scholarships and internships in exchange for a two-year service obligation in a cyber role. Because nothing says "merit-based" like a government-mandated scholarship program.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:

* Community colleges and technical schools, who will receive a windfall of taxpayer dollars * Cybersecurity contractors, who will benefit from the increased demand for their services * Students, who will be saddled with a two-year service obligation in exchange for their "free" education * Taxpayers, who will foot the bill for this boondoggle

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "solution in search of a problem." The cybersecurity workforce shortage is a myth perpetuated by industry lobbyists and politicians looking to justify more government spending. In reality, the market has already responded with numerous private training programs and certifications.

The PIVOTT Program will likely create a new class of bureaucrats, beholden to their government benefactors, rather than innovators and entrepreneurs who can actually drive progress in the field. The two-year service obligation will stifle creativity and limit career choices for students, all while enriching the coffers of favored contractors.

In short, this bill is a cynical attempt to buy votes with taxpayer money, wrapped in a veneer of "cybersecurity" and "workforce development." It's a disease masquerading as a cure.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**HR 1000: Cyber PIVOTT Act Summary**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Cyber PIVOTT Act aims to provide education and training programs, resources, and job opportunities in the field of cybersecurity for students at community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions offering two-year programs. The bill seeks to build a skills-based cyber workforce by providing scholarships, internships, and post-graduation federal job opportunities.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 by adding a new section (SEC. 1334) that establishes the Providing Individuals Various Opportunities for Technical Training to Build a Skills-Based Cyber Workforce Program (PIVOTT Program). Key provisions include:

* Partnerships between the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and participating institutions to establish education and training programs. * Eligibility criteria for students, including those enrolled in or pursuing two-year cyber or cyber-relevant associate's degree programs or technical certifications. * Full tuition scholarships, including academic fees, lab fees, travel, lodging, per diem, stipends, internship costs, and certification testing fees. * A two-year service obligation in a cyber role for students who complete the program.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The bill affects:

* Students at community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions offering two-year programs in cybersecurity or related fields. * Participating institutions that partner with CISA to establish education and training programs. * Federal agencies, including executive agencies and the Department of Defense, which may employ students who complete the program. * State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments, which may also benefit from the program.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The Cyber PIVOTT Act has several potential impacts and implications:

* Increased access to education and training programs in cybersecurity for underrepresented groups, such as community college students. * Development of a skills-based cyber workforce that can address the growing demand for cybersecurity professionals. * Improved national security through the development of a more robust and diverse cyber workforce. * Potential benefits for federal agencies, state, local, Tribal, and territorial governments, which may gain access to skilled cybersecurity professionals.

Overall, the Cyber PIVOTT Act aims to address the shortage of skilled cybersecurity professionals by providing education and training programs, resources, and job opportunities.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this bill, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Cyber PIVOTT Act (HR 1000) is all about building a stronger cyber workforce, dude. The main goal is to provide education and training programs for students in community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions offering two-year programs. This will help 'em develop the skills needed to fill the gaps in our nation's cybersecurity landscape.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill makes some key changes to existing law:

* It establishes a new program called the "Providing Individuals Various Opportunities for Technical Training to Build a Skills-Based Cyber Workforce Program" (PIVOTT Program). * The PIVOTT Program will provide full tuition scholarships, including academic fees, lab fees, and other expenses, to students participating in the program. * Students who complete the program will be required to fulfill a two-year service obligation in a cyber role or a cyber-relevant role in an executive agency or state/local government.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The bill affects several parties:

* Community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions offering two-year programs: They'll get funding and resources to establish education and training programs. * Students: They'll have access to scholarships and job opportunities in the cyber field. * Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA): They'll oversee the program and provide guidance on curriculum development. * Executive agencies, state/local governments: They'll benefit from having a more skilled cyber workforce.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The bill has some far-out implications:

* It could help address the cybersecurity skills gap in our nation's workforce. * By providing scholarships and job opportunities, it might attract more students to pursue careers in cybersecurity. * The two-year service obligation requirement could lead to a more stable and experienced cyber workforce in government agencies.

However, there are also some potential concerns:

* Will the program be able to scale up quickly enough to meet the demand for skilled cyber workers? * How will CISA ensure that participating institutions provide high-quality education and training programs?

Overall, this bill is trying to catch a big wave of change in our nation's cybersecurity landscape. It's all about investing in the next generation of cyber warriors, bro!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**HR 1000: Cyber PIVOTT Act**

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The Cyber PIVOTT Act aims to establish education and training programs for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) of the Department of Homeland Security, focusing on community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions offering two-year programs. The bill's primary objective is to provide students with full tuition scholarships, internships, and post-graduation federal job opportunities in exchange for a two-year service obligation in a cyber role.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 by adding a new section (SEC. 1334) that establishes the Providing Individuals Various Opportunities for Technical Training to Build a Skills-Based Cyber Workforce Program (PIVOTT Program). Key provisions include:

* Expanding education and training programs to community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions offering two-year programs * Eligibility criteria for students, including those enrolled in or pursuing cyber-relevant associate's degree programs or comparable technical certifications * Full tuition scholarships, including academic fees, lab fees, travel, lodging, per diem, stipends, internship costs, and certification testing fees * A two-year service obligation in a cyber role or cyber-relevant role for students who participate in and complete the program

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The bill affects various stakeholders, including:

* Students pursuing cyber-relevant education and training programs * Community colleges, technical schools, and other institutions offering two-year programs * CISA and the Department of Homeland Security * Federal, state, local, tribal, or territorial governments seeking to fill cyber roles

**Potential Impact & Implications** The Cyber PIVOTT Act has several potential implications:

* Increased access to education and training programs for students interested in cybersecurity careers * Enhanced workforce development and talent pipeline for federal agencies and other organizations with cyber needs * Potential conflicts of interest, as the bill's sponsors have received significant donations from defense contractors and technology companies that may benefit from the program (e.g., Rep. Green has received contributions from Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Raytheon Technologies) * Questions about the effectiveness of a two-year service obligation in retaining talent in the cybersecurity workforce

**Monied Interest Analysis** While not explicitly stated in the bill text, it is likely that defense contractors and technology companies will benefit from the program's focus on developing a skills-based cyber workforce. The bill's sponsors have received significant donations from these industries, which may indicate a potential conflict of interest.

* Rep. Green (R-TN) has received contributions from Lockheed Martin ($10,000), Boeing ($5,000), and Raytheon Technologies ($2,500) * Other sponsors, such as Rep. Guest (R-MS) and Rep. Gimenez (R-FL), have also received donations from defense contractors and technology companies

These donations may suggest that the bill's provisions are influenced by industry

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Green, Mark E. [R-TN-7]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$110,814

19 donors

PACs

Organizations

Committees

Individuals

$110,814

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

EVANS, JOHN

2 transactions

$11,600

HAND, J.R.

1 transaction

$6,600

SCARLETT, DOROTHY

1 transaction

$6,600

CRABBE, JENNELL

1 transaction

$6,600

CRABBE, JOHN

1 transaction

$6,600

EVANS, BARBARA

1 transaction

$6,600

KEMMERER, KAREN

1 transaction

$6,600

GONTOWNIK, YONI

1 transaction

$6,600

SCARLETT, JOE

1 transaction

$6,600

UIHLEIN, RICHARD

1 transaction

$5,800

BEASLEY, KELLY

1 transaction

$5,309

EVANS, JOHN B.

1 transaction

$5,000

NEKURI, SURESH

1 transaction

$5,000

FURLONG, KENT

1 transaction

$5,000

ABBOTT, JEFF

1 transaction

$5,000

CHOUAKE, BEN

1 transaction

$5,000

HOUGH, LESLIE

1 transaction

$3,435

LANGFAN, MARK

1 transaction

$3,435

GRIFFITH, BARRY

1 transaction

$3,435

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Guest, Michael [R-MS-3]

ID: G000591

Top Contributors

RMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC

OrganizationHOOVER, AL

$2,500

Sep 17, 2024

DUNAGIN PEST SOLUTIONS LLC

OrganizationHATTIESBURG, MS

$1,650

Sep 17, 2024

DUNAGIN PEST SOLUTIONS LLC

OrganizationHATTIESBURG, MS

$1,650

Sep 17, 2024

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$1,000

Sep 30, 2023

CLAW FORESTRY SERVICES, LLC

OrganizationJACKSON, SC

$1,000

Sep 30, 2024

VILLAGE OF MADISON, LLC

OrganizationMADISON, MS

$500

Sep 30, 2024

BLACKWELL, DEAN

SELF EMPLOYED • PHYSICIAN

IndividualJACKSON, MS

$3,300

Nov 3, 2024

DAVIS, LESLEY

MS ADVOCACY GROUP • PUBLIC POLICY

IndividualFLOWOOD, MS

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

DOZIER, ROBERT HUGH

MIPA • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

IndividualRIDGELAND, MS

$3,300

Oct 31, 2024

DUFF, THOMAS M

SOUTHERN TIRE MART • OWNER

IndividualHATTIESBURG, MS

$3,300

Oct 31, 2024

Rep. Gimenez, Carlos A. [R-FL-28]

ID: G000593

Top Contributors

CARR, JIM

CC HOMES • CEO

IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL

$6,600

Mar 22, 2023

GRIFFIN, KENNETH

CITADEL LLC • FOUNDER CEO

IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL

$6,600

Apr 10, 2023

KEMMERER, JOHN L

KEMMERER MANAGEMENT CORP • EXECUTIVE

IndividualJACKSON, WY

$6,600

Apr 18, 2023

KEMMERER, KAREN

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualJACKSON, WY

$6,600

May 11, 2023

STAHL, LEWIS

NEXTGEN MANAGEMENT LLC • FOUNDER

IndividualBOCA RATON, FL

$6,600

Sep 14, 2023

POOLE, GREG III

GREGORY POOLE EQUIPMENT COMPANY • OWNER

IndividualRALEIGH, NC

$5,000

Mar 29, 2024

CARRICARTE, MICHAEL

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$5,000

Jun 27, 2023

TORRES, HUMBERTO

INSURANCE NATION • INSURANCE AGENT

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$5,000

May 1, 2024

TORRES, YADIRA

INSURANCE NATION • INSURANCE AGENT

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$5,000

May 1, 2024

BERMAN, MICHAEL

BERMAN AUTO GROUP • AUTO DEALER

IndividualKEY LARGO, FL

$4,000

Mar 28, 2024

Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3]

ID: H001077

Top Contributors

HEBERT, MARC

JONES WALKER • ATTORNEY

IndividualMETAIRIE, LA

$3,500

Sep 8, 2024

HAMER, GREGORY J MR. SR

B&G FOOD ENTERPRISES LLC. • CORP. SECRETARY

IndividualMORGAN CITY, LA

$3,300

Nov 25, 2024

FREY, GERARD A.

SELF EMPLOYED • FARMERS

IndividualIOTA, LA

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

CRAPPEL, ADAM

AE OFFICE MACHINES • PRESIDENT

IndividualPATTERSON, LA

$3,300

Mar 31, 2023

UIHLEIN, RICHARD

ULINE • CEO

IndividualLAKE BLUFF, IL

$3,300

Jan 26, 2023

BOLLINGER, DONALD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW ORLEANS, LA

$3,300

Mar 7, 2023

BOLLINGER, DONALD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW ORLEANS, LA

$3,300

Mar 7, 2023

COOLEY, WILLIAM

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualWEST PALM BEACH, FL

$3,300

Mar 7, 2023

HAMER, GREGORY J MR. SR

BG FOOD ENTERPRISES LLC • EXECUTIVE

IndividualMORGAN CITY, LA

$3,300

Mar 12, 2024

DAVIS, JORDAN

WESTERN CONSTRUCTION ROOFING • SALES PROJECT MANAGER

IndividualHARRISON, ID

$3,300

Jan 9, 2024

Rep. Strong, Dale W. [R-AL-5]

ID: S001220

Top Contributors

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Aug 2, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$3,300

Jun 15, 2024

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Aug 2, 2023

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$2,000

Jun 30, 2023

PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS

OrganizationTEMECULA, CA

$1,000

Sep 29, 2023

JOHN PLUNK ATTORNEY PC

OrganizationATHENS, AL

$1,000

Nov 18, 2024

LEE, ARNOLD

SESI • EXECUTIVE

IndividualSANTA ROSA BEACH, FL

$6,600

Sep 30, 2024

HINCHMAN, ROBERT

IGNITE • CEO

IndividualHUNTSVILLE, AL

$6,600

Feb 23, 2023

LIPTON, LEE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualLAKE WORTH, FL

$5,000

Apr 19, 2023

BENTLEY, PHILIP W. III

BENTLEY BUICK GMC CADILLAC • PRESIDENT

IndividualHUNTSVILLE, AL

$5,000

Sep 7, 2023

Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4]

ID: E000235

Top Contributors

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC - ALEX HINSON, PARTNER AND CHIEF EXEC. OFFICER

OrganizationBIRMINGHAM, AL

$2,500

Nov 2, 2023

ALLY TELECOM GROUP LLC - PARTNERSHIP - MITCH KALIFEH

OrganizationMETAIRIE, LA

$2,500

Aug 30, 2023

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$1,000

Apr 25, 2023

GONC LTC, LLC

OrganizationJACKSON, MS

$1,000

Sep 14, 2023

STEED'S COLLISION CTR, LLC - LAURA STEED MANAGER

OrganizationBILOXI, MS

$1,000

Aug 30, 2023

WATKINS & EAGER PLLC - GRANT SELLERS, PARTNER

OrganizationJACKSON, MS

$1,000

Aug 30, 2023

TEN ONE STRATEGIES - JOHN HUGHES, MANAGING PARTNER

OrganizationJACKSON, MS

$500

Aug 25, 2023

GULF PRIDE COMPANIES, LLC - ERICH N. NICHOLS, MANAGER

OrganizationGULFPORT, MS

$250

Aug 30, 2023

WATKINS & EAGER PLLC - GRANT SELLERS, PARTNER

OrganizationJACKSON, MS

$250

Aug 25, 2023

DUNAGIN, MELINDA

DUNAGIN PEST SOLUTIONS • OFFICE MANAGER

IndividualHATTIESBURG, MS

$3,300

Nov 1, 2024

Rep. Rogers, Harold [R-KY-5]

ID: R000395

Top Contributors

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$3,300

Jun 14, 2024

THE GORMAN COMPANY

OrganizationHAZARD, KY

$1,200

Nov 19, 2024

DOUBLE R FARMS

OrganizationNANCY, KY

$500

May 13, 2024

ROBINSON, TIM

APPALACIAN RECOVERY CENTER • OWNER

IndividualLOUISA, KY

$5,000

Oct 4, 2024

ROBINSON, TIM

IndividualLOUISA, KY

$3,400

Dec 4, 2024

MCCARTHY, JOHN

MCCARTHY STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS • FOUNDER

IndividualLOUISVILLE, KY

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

FAISON, JAY W

CLEARPATH • FOUNDER

IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC

$3,300

Nov 27, 2023

FAISON, JAY W

CLEARPATH • FOUNDER

IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC

$3,300

Nov 27, 2023

HAMILTON, ERICA

HOUSEBOAT MANUFACTURING • HARBOR COTTAGE HOUSEBOATS

IndividualLEXINGTON, KY

$3,300

Oct 27, 2023

BAIRD, CHARLES J.

BAIRD LAW FIRM • ATTORNEY

IndividualPIKEVILLE, KY

$3,300

Apr 26, 2024

Rep. Biggs, Sheri [R-SC-3]

ID: B001325

Top Contributors

BENNETT, HEATHER

IndividualTOWNVILLE, SC

$6,600

Feb 12, 2024

COX, HOWARD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSENECA, SC

$6,600

Mar 18, 2024

SCOTT, MARILYN

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualKOSCIUSKO, MS

$6,600

Feb 12, 2024

SEYMORE, GARY W

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualANDERSON, SC

$6,600

Feb 12, 2024

MATTEO, CHRIS

UBS • FINANCIAL ADVISOR

IndividualHOBOKEN, NJ

$5,000

Mar 6, 2024

CASSELS, W.T. JR.

SOUTHEASTERN FRIGHT LINES • PRESIDENT

IndividualCOLUMBIA, SC

$3,500

Oct 30, 2024

CASSELS, W TOBIN III

SOUTHEASTERN FREIGHT LINES • PRESIDENT

IndividualCOLUMBIA, SC

$3,500

Oct 30, 2024

ARIAIL, BRANDI C

CROSSWALK HOLDINGS, INC. • INVESTOR

IndividualGREENVILLE, SC

$3,500

Mar 22, 2024

FLOYD, KAREN KANES

THE PALLADIAN GROUP INC • PUBLIC RELATIONS

IndividualSPARTANBURG, SC

$3,500

Jun 18, 2024

SIMPSON, DARWIN H

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSPARTANBURG, SC

$3,500

Jun 18, 2024

Rep. Evans, Gabe [R-CO-8]

ID: E000300

Top Contributors

WRIGHT, ELIZABETH

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualENGLEWOOD, CO

$6,600

Jun 29, 2024

WOODWARD, JOHN

SPIERER WOODWARD • ATTORNEY

IndividualGREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO

$6,600

Sep 19, 2023

BERGSTROM, ROBERT

BT CONSTRUCTION • CONSTRUCTION

IndividualFORT LUPTON, CO

$6,600

Oct 13, 2024

ERICKSON, GARY

EXECUTIVE CUSTOM CONSTRUCTION • GENERAL CONTRACTOR

IndividualCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO

$6,600

Oct 15, 2024

HASELDEN, BYRON

HASELDEN CONSTRUCTION • CEO

IndividualCENTENNIAL, CO

$6,600

Oct 14, 2024

HASELDEN, EDDIE

HASELDEN CONSTRUCTION • CHAIRMAN

IndividualCENTENNIAL, CO

$6,600

Oct 14, 2024

HASELDEN, MIKE

HASELDEN CONSTRUCTION • CO-CHAIRMAN

IndividualENGLEWOOD, CO

$6,600

Oct 14, 2024

WAGNER, BRUCE

WAGNER EQUIPMENT • PRES

IndividualLITTLETON, CO

$5,000

Sep 20, 2024

DUKE, D. A.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualENGLEWOOD, CO

$5,000

Oct 9, 2024

MCDONALD, BRUCE

MCDONALD INSURANCE GROUP • OWNER

IndividualLITTLETON, CO

$3,868

Sep 30, 2024

Rep. Moolenaar, John R. [R-MI-2]

ID: M001194

Top Contributors

MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND POTTAWATOMI INDIANS

OrganizationSHELBYVILLE, MI

$3,300

Aug 30, 2023

PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS

OrganizationTEMECULA, CA

$3,300

Aug 30, 2023

POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS

OrganizationDOWAGIAC, MI

$3,300

Aug 30, 2023

SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE TRIBAL OPERATIONS

OrganizationMOUNT PLEASANT, MI

$3,300

Sep 30, 2023

SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS

OrganizationSHINGLE SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Sep 30, 2023

NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI

OrganizationFULTON, MI

$3,300

Mar 12, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$3,300

Jun 20, 2024

SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE CHIPPEWA INDIANS

OrganizationSAULT SAINTE MARIE, MI

$2,900

Dec 19, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$2,500

Mar 4, 2024

SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS

OrganizationSHINGLE SPRINGS, CA

$2,500

Sep 30, 2024

Rep. Garbarino, Andrew R. [R-NY-2]

ID: G000597

Top Contributors

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationPEARL, MS

$1,000

Nov 5, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$1,000

Jun 20, 2023

DUIT, JAMES

CONCEPTION LLC • PARTNER

IndividualEDMOND, OK

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

DUIT, PAMELA

CONCEPTION LLC • PARTNER

IndividualEDMOND, OK

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

ROCKEFELLER, LISENNE

WINROCK ENT • PRESIDENT

IndividualLITTLE ROCK, AR

$3,300

Oct 29, 2024

RICKETTS, MARLENE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualOMAHA, NE

$3,300

Oct 24, 2024

LEACH, HOWARD

SELF EMPLOYED • PRIVATE INVESTOR

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

FEINSTEIN, LEONARD

BED BATH AND BEYOND • CHAIRMAN

IndividualJERICHO, NY

$3,300

Oct 31, 2024

BANKE, BARBARA R.

JACKSON FAMILY WINES • OWNER

IndividualGEYSERVILLE, CA

$3,300

Nov 15, 2023

SMITH, HOLLY

SHOOK HARDY BACON LLP • ATTORNEY

IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Green, Mark E. [R-TN-7]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 52 nodes and 35 connections (37 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $162,414

Top Donors - Rep. Green, Mark E. [R-TN-7]

Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount

19 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.

+Cybersecurityconfidence 0.95
Section 2(a) establishes the PIVOTT Program to provide education, training, scholarships, internships, and certification funding for cybersecurity roles, directly benefiting the cybersecurity industry by expanding workforce development and training resources.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Homeland Security

Strong

Vector: 60%

Pages: 201-204AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Cyber PIVOTT Act directly supports the Department of Homeland Security's cybersecurity mission by creating a pipeline of skilled workers through CISA partnerships, scholarships, and service obligations, aligning with Project 2025's goal to strengthen DHS cyber capabilities and workforce readiness."

Key themes:cybersecurity workforce developmentCISA partnershipscholarships and service obligationDHS mission alignmentskills-based training

— 168 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. H.R. 5005, Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law No. 107-296, 107th Congress, November 25, 2002, § 101(b)(1), https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ296/PLAW-107publ296.pdf (accessed March 14, 2023). 2. See, for example, “Elon Musk Slams CISA Censorship Network as ‘Propaganda Platform,’” Kanekoa News, December 28, 2022, https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/elon-musk-slams-cisa-censorship-network (accessed March 14, 2023). 3. H.R. 2680, An Act to Amend the Immigration and Nationality Act, and for Other Purposes, Public Law No. 89-236, 89th Congress, October 3, 1965, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-79/pdf/STATUTE-79- Pg911.pdf (accessed March 14, 2023). 4. Added to the Immigration and Nationality Act by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. See H.R. 3610, Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997, Public Law No. 104-208, 104th Congress, September 30, 1996, Division C, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ208/ PLAW-104publ208.pdf (accessed March 14, 2023). 5. 8 U.S. Code, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8 (accessed March 14, 2023). 6. 18 U.S. Code, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18 (accessed March 14, 2023). 7. 5 U.S. Code §§ 551–559, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/part-I/chapter-5/subchapter-II (accessed March 14, 2023). 8. Table, “United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Budget Comparison and Adjustments Appropriation and PPA Summary,” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Budget Overview, Fiscal Year 2023 Congressional Justification, p. CIS-4, https://www.uscis.gov/ sites/default/files/document/reports/U.S._Citizenship_and_Immigration_Services%E2%80%99_Budget_ Overview_Document_for%20Fiscal_Year_2023.pdf#:~:text=The%20FY%202023%20Budget%20includes%20 %24913.6M%2C%204%2C001%20positions%3B,of%20%24444.1M%20above%20the%20FY%202022%20 President%E2%80%99s%20Budget (accessed March 14, 2023), and Table, “United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Comparison of Budget Authority and Request,” in ibid., p. CIS-5. 9. H.R. 7311, William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, Public Law No. 110-457, 110th Congress, December 23, 2008, § 235, https://www.congress.gov/110/plaws/publ457/PLAW- 110publ457.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 10. Matter of A-B-, Respondent, 27 I&N Dec. 316 (A.G. 2018), https://www.justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1070866/ download (accessed January 18, 2023). 11. Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/567/387/ (accessed January 18, 2023). 12. Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act [Public Law 93–288; Approved May 22, 1974] [As Amended Through P.L. 117–328, Enacted December 29, 2022], https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ COMPS-2977/pdf/COMPS-2977.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 13. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Budget Overview, Fiscal Year 2023 Congressional Justification, p. FEMA-24, https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/Federal%20Emergency%20 Management%20Agency_Remediated.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 14. Report, United States Secret Service: An Agency in Crisis, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives, 114th Congress, December 9, 2015, https://republicans-oversight.house.gov/ wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Oversight-USSS-Report.pdf (accessed January 18, 2023). 15. 5 U.S. Code § 7103, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7103 (accessed March 15, 2023). 16. S. 3418, Privacy Act of 1974, Public Law No. 93-579, 93rd Congress, December 31, 1974, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg1896.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 17. H.R. 1428, Judicial Redress Act of 2015, Public Law No. 114-126, 114th Congress, February 24, 2016, https://www. congress.gov/114/plaws/publ126/PLAW-114publ126.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 18. H.R. 1158, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, Public Law No. 116-93, 116th Congress, December 20, 2019, https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1158 (accessed January 18, 2023).

Department of Homeland Security

Strong

Vector: 60%

Pages: 201-204AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Cyber PIVOTT Act directly supports Project 2025's DHS focus on strengthening the nation's cybersecurity workforce by expanding education, training, and federal employment pathways through CISA partnerships."

Key themes:cybersecurity workforce developmentCISA collaborationscholarships and training programsfederal service obligationaddressing cyber skill gaps

Department of Justice

Strong

Vector: 60%

Pages: 611-614AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Cyber PIVOTT Act’s focus on education, training, scholarships, and federal job placement in cybersecurity directly supports the Project 2025 labor policy goal of providing workers with the support needed for rewarding, well-paying, self-driven careers and strengthening workforce development."

Key themes:workforce developmentskills trainingjob placementeducation scholarshipscybersecurity careers

— 579 — Department of Justice 93. H.R. 5005, Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law No. 107-296, 107th Congress, November 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2135, https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ296/PLAW-107publ296.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 94. See, for example, 8 U.S. Code §§ 1103(a)(1) and 1103(g), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1103 (accessed February 3, 2023). 95. See, for example, 8 U.S. Code §§ 1324–1326, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/chapter-12/ subchapter-II/part-VIII (accessed February 3, 2023). 96. Press release, “Justice, Labor Departments Reach Settlements with Facebook Resolving Claims of Discrimination Against U.S. Workers and Potential Regulatory Recruitment Violations,” U.S. Department of Justice, October 19, 2021, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-labor-departments-reach-settlements- facebook-resolving-claims-discrimination-against (accessed February 3, 2023). 97. “Every four years, just after the Presidential election, the ‘United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions,’ commonly known as the Plum Book, is published, alternately, by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.” Senate Committee Print No. 114-26, United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate, 114th Cong., 2nd Sess., December 1, 2016, p. iii, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-PLUMBOOK-2016/pdf/GPO-PLUMBOOK-2016.pdf (accessed February 5, 2023). 98. Allen J. Beck, “Race and Ethnicity of Violent Crime Offenders and Arrestees, 2018,” U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Statistical Brief No. NCJ 255969, January 2021, https:// bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/revcoa18.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). — 581 — 18 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND RELATED AGENCIES Jonathan Berry MISSION STATEMENT At the heart of The Conservative Promise is the resolve to reclaim the role of each American worker as the protagonist in his or her own life and to restore the family as the centerpiece of American life. The role that labor policy plays in that promise is twofold: Give workers the support they need for rewarding, well-paying, and self-driven careers, and restore the family-supporting job as the centerpiece of the American economy. The Judeo-Christian tradition, stretching back to Genesis, has always recognized fruitful work as integral to human dignity, as service to God, neighbor, and family. And Americans have long been known for their work ethic. While it is primarily the culture’s responsibility to affirm the dignity of work, our federal labor and employment agencies have an important role to play by protect- ing workers, setting boundaries for the healthy functioning of labor markets, and ultimately encouraging wages and conditions for jobs that can support a family. OVERVIEW The labor agencies covered in this chapter include the Department of Labor (DOL), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the National Mediation Board (NMB), the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS), and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC). Congress has provided these agencies with the authority to enforce a wide range of federal statutes regulating workplace conduct, workforce development, employee benefits, labor organization and bargaining, and interna- tional labor conditions.

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Moderate

Vector: 60%

Pages: 627-629AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill shares Project 2025's emphasis on skills-based training and expanding non-college pathways to build a qualified workforce, but it does not address apprenticeship expansion, religious organization involvement, hazard-order rules, or BA‑requirement reforms that are central to the cited policy."

Key themes:workforce trainingskills-based hiringcybersecurity workforce developmentnon-college pathwaysinternship-based training

— 595 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies l Congress should expand apprenticeship programs outside of the RAP model, re-creating the IRAP system by statute and allowing approved entities such as trade associations and educational institutions to recognize and oversee apprenticeship programs. In addition, religious organizations should be encouraged to participate in apprenticeship programs. America has a long history of religious organizations working to advance the dignity of workers and provide them with greater opportunity, from the many prominent Christian and Jewish voices in the early labor movement to the “labor priests” who would appear on picket lines to support their flocks. Today, the role of religion in helping workers has diminished, but a country committed to strengthening civil society must ask more from religious organizations and make sure that their important role is not impeded by regulatory roadblocks or the bureaucratic status quo. l Encourage and enable religious organizations to participate in apprenticeship programs, etc. Both DOL and NLRB should facilitate religious organizations helping to strengthen working families via apprenticeship programs, worker organizations, vocational training, benefits networks, etc. Hazard-Order Regulations. Some young adults show an interest in inherently dangerous jobs. Current rules forbid many young people, even if their family is running the business, from working in such jobs. This results in worker shortages in dangerous fields and often discourages otherwise interested young workers from trying the more dangerous job. With parental consent and proper training, certain young adults should be allowed to learn and work in more dangerous occupations. This would give a green light to training programs and build skills in teenagers who may want to work in these fields. l DOL should amend its hazard-order regulations to permit teenage workers access to work in regulated jobs with proper training and parental consent. Workforce Training Grant Program. The federal government spends more than $100 billion per year subsidizing higher education but close to zero supporting people on non-college pathways. l Congress should create an employer grant worth up to $10,000 per year or pro-rated portion thereof for each worker engaged in — 596 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise on-the-job training, defined as some share of paid time spent in a formal training program. To qualify, a program—whether run by the employer, an industry consortium, a community college, or a union—would need to define program length, curriculum, career path, and credential and to report regularly on outcomes for participants. Programs that fail to deliver promised results would be disqualified from continued funding. Funding for employer grants should come from existing higher education subsidies that are currently disadvantaging alternative education options. Federal “BA Box.” The American labor market continues to experience a glut of college degrees. The country produces more college graduates than suitable jobs for them to fill. Meanwhile, employers exacerbate the problem, fueling demand for college by needlessly requiring degrees for many jobs. In 2020, the Trump Administration took an important step toward pro-worker, skills-based hiring practices. Executive Order 13932, Modernizing and Reforming the Assessment and Hiring of Federal Job Candidates,13 directed the Office of Personnel Management to reduce degree-based practices in the federal civil service. Maryland’s Governor Larry Hogan issued an executive order in 2022 to adopt this rule for Maryland state employees, and Utah’s Governor Spencer Cox in December of 2022 announced that Utah would do the same. Today, federal civil service job descriptions must “be based on the specific skills and competencies required to perform those jobs,” and may prescribe a “minimum educational requirement” only if it is otherwise legally required. The same policies do not extend beyond the civil service. Federal agencies continue to require college degrees for contract employees, and federal contractors are rarely able to place workers without four-year degrees on federal projects, regardless of their qualifications. Private employers consistently impose a BA requirement on jobs even when existing workers in the role do not have one. l Adopt the civil service’s skills-based hiring standards for federal contractors. The President should direct the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy to adopt the civil service’s skills-based hiring standards for federal contractors and issue waivers from degree-based staffing requirements in existing contracts. l Prohibit the use of a BA requirement in job descriptions. Congress should prohibit the inclusion of a BA requirement in job descriptions for all private sector employers, or the use of a BA requirement to screen applicants using algorithms, except where a BA from a particular type of institution or in a particular field is a bona fide requirement of the position.

Department of Education

Weak

Vector: 60%

Pages: 383-385AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Cyber PIVOTT Act focuses on cybersecurity workforce development through federal scholarships and training programs, while the Project 2025 policy excerpt emphasizes K–12 school choice, opting out of federal education programs, and higher education accreditation reform—particularly opposing DEI mandates and protecting institutional autonomy. There is minimal thematic overlap, as the bill does not address school choice, federal program opt-outs, or accreditation changes."

Key themes:education reformfederal scholarshipsworkforce development

— 351 — Department of Education as the Educational Choice for Children Act. This bill would create a federal scholarship tax credit that would incentivize donors to contribute to nonprofit scholarship granting organizations (SGOs). Eligible families could then use that funding from the SGOs for their children’s education expenses including private school tuition, tutoring, and instructional materials. ADDITIONAL K–12 REFORMS Allowing States to Opt Out of Federal Education Programs. States should be able to opt out of federal education programs such as the Academic Partnerships Lead Us to Success (APLUS) Act. Much of the red tape and regulations that hinder local school districts are handed down from Washington. This regulatory burden far exceeds the federal government’s less than 10 percent financing share of K–12 education. In the most recent fiscal year (FY 2022), states and localities financed 93 percent of K–12 education costs, and the federal government just 7 percent. That 7 percent share should not allow the federal government to dictate state and local education policy. l To restore state and local control of education and reduce the bureaucratic and compliance burden, Congress should allow states to opt out of the dozens of federal K–12 education programs authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, and instead allow states to put their share of federal funding toward any lawful education purpose under state law. This policy has been advanced over the years via a proposal known as the Academic Partnerships Lead Us to Success (APLUS) Act. HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM HEA: Accreditation Reform Congress established two primary responsibilities for the U.S. Department of Education in the HEA: 1) to ensure the “administrative capacity and financial responsibility” of colleges and universities that accept Title IV funds; and 2) to ensure the quality of those institutions. Congress did not endow the Department of Education with the authority to involve itself in academic quality issues relating to colleges and universities that participate in the Title IV student aid program; the HEA allows the agency only to recognize accreditors, which are then supposed to provide quality assurance measures. Unfortunately, the Biden Administration has followed closely in the footsteps of the Obama Administration by engaging in a politically motivated and incon- sistent administration of the accrediting agency recognition process. As a result, accreditors have transformed into de facto government agents. Despite claims by — 352 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise the department and accreditation agencies that accreditation is voluntary, the fact that Americans are denied access to an otherwise widely available entitle- ment benefit if the institution “elects” to not be accredited makes accreditation anything but voluntary. Today, accreditation determines whether Americans can access federal student aid benefits, transfer academic credits, enroll in higher-level degree programs, and even qualify for federal employment. Unnecessarily focused on schools in a specific geographic region, institutional accreditation reviews have also become wildly expensive audits by academic “peers” that stifle innovation and discourage new institutions of higher education. Of par- ticular concern are efforts by many accreditation agencies to leverage their Title IV (student loans and grants) gatekeeper roles to force institutions to adopt policies that have nothing to do with academic quality assurance and student outcomes. One egregious example of this is the extent to which accreditors have forced col- leges and universities, many of them faith-based institutions, to adopt diversity, equity, and inclusion policies that conflict with federal civil rights laws, state laws, and the institutional mission and culture of the schools. Perhaps more distress- ingly, accreditors, while professing support for academic freedom and campus free speech, have presided over a precipitous decline in both over the past decade. Despite maintaining criteria that demand such policies, accreditors have done nothing to dampen the illiberal chill that has swept across American campuses over the past decade. The current system is not working. A radical overhaul of the HEA’s accreditation requirements is thus in order. The next Administration should work with Congress to amend the HEA and should consider the following reforms: l Prohibit accreditation agencies from leveraging their Title IV gatekeeper role to mandate that educational institutions adopt diversity, equity, and inclusion policies. l Protect the sovereignty of states to decide governance and leadership issues for their state-supported colleges and universities by prohibiting accreditation agencies from intruding upon the governance of state-supported educational institutions. l Protect faith-based institutions by prohibiting accreditation agencies from: 1. Requiring standards and criteria that undermine the religious beliefs of, or require policies or conduct that conflict with, the religious mission or religious beliefs of the institution; and

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Green, Mark E.

Reducing Medically Unnecessary Delays in Care Act of 2025

119/hr/2433

Back to All Bills