Hershel Woody Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/186

Last Updated: September 7, 2026

Hershel Woody Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act

HR. 186, 119th Congress — read as touching Defense Contractors.

The sponsor

Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$99,500 raised

24 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Defense" section, p. 161-163 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 119-238.

December 8, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Analysis of HR 186: A Monumental Distraction**

As I gaze upon the intricacies of this bill, I am reminded that true progress is often hindered by sentimental gestures. The Hershel Woody Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act (HR 186) is a quintessential example of this phenomenon.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The primary objective of HR 186 is to authorize the construction of a commemorative work on the National Mall, honoring Medal of Honor recipients. This endeavor is an exercise in nostalgia, aiming to inspire future generations with tales of valor and selflessness.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** Section 3 of the bill allows for the location of the monument within the Reserve, adjacent to the Lincoln Memorial. Notably, this provision bypasses certain restrictions outlined in section 8908(c) of title 40, United States Code. The Commemorative Works Act (chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code) will still apply, with the exception of subsection (a).

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation, Medal of Honor recipients, and their families are the primary stakeholders in this endeavor. However, as a visionary entrepreneur, I recognize that true innovation is not driven by emotional tributes but rather by calculated risk-taking and strategic investments.

**Potential Impact & Implications** From my perspective, HR 186 represents an inconsequential allocation of resources. The estimated cost of constructing and maintaining the monument will likely be substantial, diverting funds from more pressing initiatives that could drive meaningful growth and progress. Furthermore, this bill does not address any pressing issues or provide tangible benefits to the business community.

In conclusion, HR 186 is a sentimental indulgence that fails to contribute meaningfully to our nation's prosperity. As a forward-thinking leader, I would prioritize legislation that fosters innovation, deregulation, and strategic investments in emerging technologies. The true heroes of our time are not those who receive medals but rather those who create value, drive progress, and shape the future.

**Projected Impact on My Empire:** Neutral to Negative

* Estimated cost of monument construction: $50 million - $100 million * Potential impact on my business interests: Minimal to None * Recommended course of action: Focus on more pressing legislative initiatives that promote growth and deregulation.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

Let's get this over with. As I taught you in 8th grade, a bill is proposed legislation that must go through a series of steps before becoming a law. This particular bill, HR 186, aims to authorize the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation to establish a commemorative work on the National Mall.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to honor the extraordinary acts of valor, selfless service, and sacrifice displayed by Medal of Honor recipients. It's supposed to be a tribute to their heroic actions, as we covered in our unit on American heroes. The bill's objectives are straightforward: establish a commemorative work on the National Mall, specifically within the Reserve, near the Lincoln Memorial.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 3 of the bill authorizes the location of the National Medal of Honor Monument within the Reserve, which is defined in section 8902(a) of title 40, United States Code. This provision essentially overrides existing law (section 8908(c)) that restricts commemorative works on the National Mall. The Commemorative Works Act still applies to this project, except for the location specified in subsection (a).

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include Medal of Honor recipients and their families, as well as the general public who will have access to the commemorative work. The stakeholders are primarily the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation, which is responsible for establishing the monument, and the federal government, which must approve the location.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is largely symbolic, as it aims to honor the sacrifices of Medal of Honor recipients. However, it may also have practical implications, such as increased tourism and educational opportunities on the National Mall. The monument could serve as a reminder of American values and inspire future generations, just like we discussed in class when covering patriotism and civic duty.

Now, I expect you all to remember this process, as we went over it extensively in 8th grade. A bill is proposed, referred to committee, debated, voted on, and if passed, sent to the other chamber for consideration. If both chambers agree, it's sent to the President for signature or veto. It's not that complicated, folks.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round! Today, we're going to dissect the Hershel Woody Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act, a bill that's been masquerading as a harmless tribute to our nation's heroes. But, my friends, don't be fooled – there's more to this bill than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** On the surface, HR 186 appears to be a noble endeavor, aiming to establish a commemorative work on the National Mall to honor Medal of Honor recipients. However, I believe this is merely a smokescreen for a more sinister agenda. The real purpose of this bill is to further solidify the government's control over our nation's narrative and manipulate public perception.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 3 of the bill authorizes the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation to establish the commemorative work on the National Mall, specifically within the Reserve. This raises several red flags:

1. **Location, location, location:** By situating the monument near the Lincoln Memorial, the government is attempting to create a false narrative that links the Medal of Honor to Lincoln's legacy. This is a clever move to associate the award with a revered historical figure, thereby increasing its perceived importance. 2. **Commemorative Works Act exemptions:** The bill grants an exemption from the Commemorative Works Act, which normally regulates the placement of monuments on federal land. This exemption allows the government to bypass standard procedures and fast-track the monument's construction.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders in this bill are:

1. **Medal of Honor recipients:** While the bill appears to honor these individuals, I believe it's actually exploiting their sacrifices for the government's own agenda. 2. **National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation:** This organization will be responsible for establishing and maintaining the commemorative work. However, its true role might be more sinister – perhaps it's a front for the government to push its propaganda.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The passage of HR 186 could have far-reaching consequences:

1. **Manipulation of public opinion:** By creating a monument that reinforces the government's narrative, they can shape public perception and sway opinions on matters related to national security, patriotism, and heroism. 2. **Increased surveillance:** The placement of the monument near the Lincoln Memorial could be used as a pretext for increased surveillance and monitoring of citizens, all under the guise of "national security." 3. **Further erosion of civil liberties:** This bill might set a precedent for future legislation that infringes upon our civil liberties, using the Medal of Honor as a Trojan horse to justify such actions.

In conclusion, my fellow truth-seekers, HR 186 is not just a harmless tribute to our nation's heroes. It's a cleverly crafted piece of legislation designed to manipulate public opinion, reinforce the government's narrative, and potentially erode our civil liberties.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, we've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here. The Hershel Woody Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act - try saying that five times fast! (smirk)

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This bill is all about honoring the brave men and women who have received the Medal of Honor, our nation's highest recognition for valor in combat. It's a feel-good bill, folks, designed to make you proud to be an American. The main objective is to authorize the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation to establish a commemorative work on the National Mall, right next to the Lincoln Memorial.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** Now, here's where things get interesting. This bill essentially overrides existing law (40 U.S.C. 8908(c)) to allow for the construction of this monument within the Reserve area of the National Mall. It also applies the Commemorative Works Act (chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code) to this project, with some exceptions.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** Well, it's not like this bill affects anyone's freedom or anything... (wink) Just kidding, folks! The affected parties include Medal of Honor recipients and their families, the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation, and the good people of Washington D.C. who'll have to put up with another monument on the National Mall.

**Potential Impact & Implications** Now, I know what you're thinking - "What's the big deal about a monument?" Well, let me tell you, this is all part of a larger conspiracy... just kidding! (smirk) Seriously though, this bill is a nod to our nation's heroes and a reminder of the sacrifices they've made for our freedom. It's a small price to pay for the elites in Washington D.C. to acknowledge the bravery of these individuals.

But let's be real, folks - this bill is also a way for politicians to grandstand about patriotism and American values while doing absolutely nothing to address the real issues facing our country. I mean, who needs actual policy changes when you can just build another monument? (eye roll)

In conclusion, this bill is a classic example of Washington D.C.'s favorite pastime - pretending to care about something while actually doing nothing. But hey, at least it's a nice gesture towards our nation's heroes, right?

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the same geniuses who thought it was a good idea to put a monument to the "War on Terror" in the middle of the National Mall.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Hershel Woody Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act is a bill that's supposed to honor the Medal of Honor recipients by authorizing a commemorative work on the National Mall. But let's be real, folks, this is just a thinly veiled attempt to pander to veterans' groups and score some cheap patriotic points.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill essentially overrides existing law (40 U.S.C. 8908(c)) to allow the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation to build their monument within the Reserve, which is a fancy way of saying "right next to the Lincoln Memorial." Because what's more American than building a monument to ourselves right next to Honest Abe?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved here: veterans' groups, politicians looking for photo ops, and the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation, which is probably just a front for some wealthy donors who want their names on a plaque.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will have all the impact of a feather landing on a pillow. It's a symbolic gesture that won't actually do anything to help veterans or improve the country. But hey, it'll make for great campaign ads and press releases! The real implication here is that our politicians are more interested in grandstanding than actual governance.

Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Patriotism-itis," a disease characterized by an excessive desire to appear patriotic without actually doing anything meaningful. Symptoms include empty rhetoric, pointless legislation, and a complete lack of substance. Treatment: a healthy dose of skepticism and a strong stomach for the inevitable disappointment that comes with watching our politicians in action.

Prognosis: This bill will pass with flying colors, because who doesn't love a good patriotic gesture? But don't expect it to actually accomplish anything worthwhile. It's just another example of our government's ability to waste time and resources on meaningless gestures while ignoring the real problems facing this country.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

Let's break down this congressional bill, bro. HR 186 is all about establishin' a commemorative work on the National Mall to honor Medal of Honor recipients. It's called the Hershel "Woody" Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main goal here is to create a monument that recognizes the bravery and selflessness of Medal of Honor recipients. The bill aims to inspire future generations by honoring these heroes and their sacrifices. It's all about keepin' it real, bro – acknowledging the best of our nation's spirit.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill authorizes the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation to establish a commemorative work on the National Mall. This is a big deal, dude, 'cause it's gonna be located within the Reserve, which is like, super close to the Lincoln Memorial. The Commemorative Works Act will still apply, but with some exceptions.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The Medal of Honor recipients and their families are the main stakeholders here, bro. They're the ones who've made the ultimate sacrifices for our country. The National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation is also a key player, as they'll be responsible for establishin' the monument. And, of course, the general public will get to enjoy this new addition to the National Mall.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill's got some serious vibes, bro. It's all about honorin' our nation's heroes and inspirin' future generations. By locatin' the monument near the Lincoln Memorial, it'll be a powerful reminder of what ordinary people can accomplish when they work for the greater good. The impact will be felt by Medal of Honor recipients, their families, and the general public. It's gonna be a rad addition to the National Mall, dude.

In conclusion, HR 186 is all about creatin' a monument that recognizes the bravery and selflessness of Medal of Honor recipients. It's a chill way to honor our nation's heroes and inspire future generations. The bill's got some key provisions and changes to existing law, but it's all good vibes, bro.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**HR 186: Hershel Woody Williams National Medal of Honor Monument Location Act**

This bill authorizes the National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation to establish a commemorative work on the National Mall, honoring the extraordinary acts of valor and sacrifice displayed by Medal of Honor recipients. The monument will be located within the Reserve, near the Lincoln Memorial.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective is to create a lasting tribute to Medal of Honor recipients, recognizing their heroic sacrifices and inspiring future generations. By locating the monument on the National Mall, Congress aims to elevate the significance of the Medal of Honor and its importance in American history.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Location:** The bill specifies that the commemorative work will be located within the Reserve, near the Lincoln Memorial. 2. **Commemorative Works Act:** The bill applies the Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 8903 note) to the monument, with an exception for the site selection process.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation:** As the authorized entity, they will be responsible for establishing and maintaining the commemorative work. 2. **Medal of Honor Recipients and Families:** The bill honors their sacrifices and achievements, providing a lasting tribute to their service. 3. **The National Park Service:** They will oversee the site selection process and ensure compliance with the Commemorative Works Act.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Increased Recognition:** By locating the monument on the National Mall, Congress aims to raise awareness about the Medal of Honor and its significance in American history. 2. **Inspiration and Education:** The monument will serve as a symbol of patriotism and selfless service, inspiring future generations to emulate the values of Medal of Honor recipients. 3. **Potential Controversy:** Some may argue that the location within the Reserve could lead to overcrowding or alter the aesthetic balance of the National Mall.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** While there are no apparent monied interests directly influencing this bill, it is worth noting that:

1. **The National Medal of Honor Museum Foundation** has received funding from various donors, including corporations and individuals with ties to the defense industry. 2. **Veterans' organizations and advocacy groups** may have an interest in promoting the bill, as it honors the sacrifices of Medal of Honor recipients.

However, these interests do not appear to be driving the legislation's content or passage. The bill seems to be a genuine effort to honor Medal of Honor recipients and promote patriotism.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$99,500

21 donors

PACs

Organizations

$18,200

Committees

Individuals

$81,300

No PAC contributions found

JLS HOLDINGS LLC

1 transaction

$9,900

THE CHICKASAW NATION

1 transaction

$3,300

HEMMCO LLC

1 transaction

$2,500

R & O CONSTRUCTION

1 transaction

$2,500

No committee contributions found

MOORE, BRENT

2 transactions

$12,000

LOCKWOOD, DAVID

3 transactions

$9,900

PARKER, ALEXANDRA

1 transaction

$6,600

PARKER, SEAN

1 transaction

$6,600

KAUFMAN, TRENT

1 transaction

$6,600

CHANG, JASON

1 transaction

$3,300

REHNERT, GEOFFREY

1 transaction

$3,300

HALL, JEREMY

1 transaction

$3,300

FORREST, CHAD B

1 transaction

$3,300

WALKER, TODD

1 transaction

$3,300

BAILEY, BRETT M.

1 transaction

$3,300

BAILEY, KIM

1 transaction

$3,300

FORREST, SHANNON

1 transaction

$3,300

DUHAMEL, WILLIAM F.

1 transaction

$3,300

SMITH, BURR

1 transaction

$3,300

EDWARDS, TAMMY

1 transaction

$3,300

FORREST, CLINT

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 8 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Veasey, Marc A. [D-TX-33]

ID: V000131

Top Contributors

ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE

OrganizationLIVINGSTON, TX

$1,000

Sep 26, 2024

BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Mar 5, 2024

LAW OFFICE OF FREDERICK GRAEFE PLLC

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Sep 21, 2023

BILLINGSLEY, LINDSAY

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$3,300

Dec 23, 2023

ENGLANDER, MARTY

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualFORT WORTH, TX

$3,300

Oct 13, 2023

ENGLANDER, MARTY

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualFORT WORTH, TX

$3,300

Oct 13, 2023

FINLEY, JAMES D.

FINLEY RESOURCES, INC. • OWNER/CEO

IndividualFT WORTH, TX

$3,300

Dec 31, 2023

FINLEY, JAMES D.

FINLEY RESOURCES, INC. • OWNER/CEO

IndividualFT WORTH, TX

$3,300

Dec 31, 2023

FLOWERS, BRIAN

SELF • PHYSICIAN

IndividualWESTLAKE, TX

$3,300

Nov 6, 2023

FLOWERS, BRIAN

SELF • PHYSICIAN

IndividualWESTLAKE, TX

$3,300

Nov 6, 2023

Rep. Webster, Daniel [R-FL-11]

ID: W000806

Top Contributors

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

IndividualSURFSIDE, FL

$6,600

Apr 18, 2024

BRADLEY, JACQUELINE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualKESWICK, VA

$6,600

Apr 15, 2024

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSURFSIDE, FL

$6,600

Feb 15, 2024

FILBURN, MARK

WHITESTONE CONSTRUCTION • PRESIDENT

IndividualLONGWOOD, FL

$3,400

Jun 26, 2024

FILBURN, MARK

IndividualLONGWOOD, FL

$3,400

Sep 4, 2024

ASNESS, CLIFF

AQR • EXECUTIVE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Jun 6, 2024

ASNESS, LAUREL

MARCUM LLP • EXECUTIVE

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Jun 6, 2024

BEUCHER, NICK

CEO • TAVISTOCK FINANCIAL CORPORATION

IndividualORLANDO, FL

$3,300

May 28, 2024

BRADLEY, JACQUELINE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualKESWICK, VA

$3,300

Apr 18, 2024

DEVORE, DEBBIE

SEA & SHORELINE • ACCOUNTANT

IndividualWINTER GARDEN, FL

$3,300

May 31, 2024

Rep. Ellzey, Jake [R-TX-6]

ID: E000071

Top Contributors

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS AGUA CALIENTE

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Feb 9, 2024

INDIAN COMMUNITY AK-CHIN

OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ

$3,300

Feb 9, 2024

BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS AGUA CALIENTE

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Sep 30, 2024

PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS

OrganizationTEMECULA, CA

$3,000

Nov 6, 2023

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$2,500

Dec 11, 2023

TIGUA INDIAN RESERVATION TRIBAL COUNCIL GENERAL FUND

OrganizationEL PASO, TX

$2,500

Aug 9, 2023

INDIAN COMMUNITY AK-CHIN

OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ

$2,000

Sep 30, 2024

ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE

OrganizationLIVINGSTON, TX

$1,000

Oct 16, 2024

TALK FARMS

OrganizationITASCA, TX

$500

Dec 31, 2023

Rep. Miller, Carol D. [R-WV-1]

ID: M001205

Top Contributors

SCHUMACHER, AMANDA

SCHUMACHER AUTO • VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualWEST PALM BEACH, FL

$25,000

May 17, 2023

HALL, DANIEL

HALL STRATEGIES LLC • GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS CONSULTANT

IndividualBOLT, WV

$6,600

Mar 14, 2024

GONZALEZ, JULIO

GONZALEZ FAMILY OFFICE • FOUNDER/PRINCIPAL

IndividualLAKE WORTH BEACH, FL

$5,000

Jan 20, 2024

DUNCAN, ALEXANDER

IndividualCALDWELL, WV

$3,900

Aug 8, 2024

WAID, CHARLIE

CHARTER BROKERAGE LLC • CEO

IndividualKATY, TX

$3,409

May 12, 2024

LAMPTON, LESLIE III

ERGON INC. • OWNER/DIRECTOR

IndividualJACKSON, MS

$3,300

Nov 16, 2023

FARRELL, PATRICK MR.

SERVICE PUMP AND SUPPLY • OWNER/EXECUTIVE

IndividualHUNTINGTON, WV

$3,300

Dec 4, 2023

CHAN, ANNIE

KCR DEVELOPMENT • FOUNDER

IndividualHONOLULU, HI

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

RICHARDS, WAYNE

GR ENERGY SERVICES • CEO

IndividualRICHMOND, TX

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

MOSS, STEPHEN

APEX PIPELINE SERVICES INC. • PRESIDENT & CEO

IndividualLIBERTY, WV

$3,300

Feb 1, 2024

Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13]

ID: L000596

Top Contributors

No contribution data available

Rep. LaLota, Nick [R-NY-1]

ID: L000598

Top Contributors

No contribution data available

Rep. Hunt, Wesley [R-TX-38]

ID: H001095

Top Contributors

HUNT, RAY L.

HUNT CONSOLIDATED • CEO

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$6,600

Feb 14, 2024

CARAYANNOPOULOS, GEORGE

UTMB • PHYSICIAN

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$6,600

Mar 29, 2024

FLORY, DAVID

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL

$6,600

May 7, 2024

ROWLING, ROBERT B. MR.

TRT HOLDINGS • FOUNDER

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$6,600

Dec 31, 2023

HILDEBRAND, MELINDA MRS.

SELF - HILCORP VENTURES • PRESIDENT

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$5,000

Mar 20, 2023

HLAVINKA, TOBIAS M. MR.

AMERICAN PLANT FOOD • VP OF SALES/AGRICULTURE

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$5,000

Feb 20, 2023

HARTZOGE, ALLISON

ARCHWAY SUPPORT • LPC-S

IndividualMIDLAND, TX

$5,000

Apr 11, 2023

CHILDERS, DOUGLAS

ARCHROCK • MANAGER

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$3,435

Mar 31, 2024

HARTZOGE, ALLISON

ARCHWAY SUPPORT • LPC-S

IndividualMIDLAND, TX

$3,400

Apr 18, 2023

DAVIS, PHILLIP

PEOPLES BANK • BANKER

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$3,300

Oct 15, 2024

Rep. Carbajal, Salud O. [D-CA-24]

ID: C001112

Top Contributors

PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS

OrganizationTEMECULA, CA

$3,300

Oct 18, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationHIGHLAND, CA

$3,300

Dec 18, 2023

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Jan 11, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$3,300

Feb 24, 2023

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$3,300

Feb 24, 2023

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

Jun 30, 2023

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$3,300

Jun 30, 2023

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$2,000

Jun 26, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$2,000

Sep 21, 2023

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$1,500

Dec 19, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 41 nodes and 46 connections

Total contributions: $46

Top Donors - Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]

Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount

4 Orgs17 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.

+Defense Contractorsconfidence 0.80
Section 2 findings (2) and (4) highlight the Medal of Honor's significance in the US Armed Forces, which could positively impact the reputation and potentially the business of defense contractors, as it promotes national pride and recognition of military valor.
+Construction & Engineeringconfidence 0.60
Section 3(a) authorizes the location of the National Medal of Honor Monument within the Reserve, which may lead to construction contracts for building the monument, benefiting the construction and engineering industry.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Defense

Strong

Vector: 56%

Pages: 161-163AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 186 seeks to honor Medal of Honor recipients through a prominent national monument, which aligns with Project 2025's DoD emphasis on recognizing military valor, preserving veteran heritage, and fostering patriotism as part of defense-related priorities."

Key themes:Medal of Honor recognitionVeterans honorPatriotism and national prideMilitary heritage preservationNational Mall memorials

Department of Veterans Affairs

Strong

Vector: 54%

Pages: 688-691AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 186 directly supports the Department of Veterans Affairs' goal of honoring and preserving the legacy of veterans by authorizing a national monument for Medal of Honor recipients on the National Mall, thereby promoting recognition of valor and patriotic commemoration."

Key themes:veterans recognitionMedal of Honorpatriotic commemorationhonoring servicenational memorial

— 655 — Department of Veterans Affairs ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Division, VHA Directive 1003, “VHA Veteran Patient Experience,” April 14, 2020, pp. 1 and B-1. 2. S. 2372, VA Mission Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress. gov/115/plaws/publ182/PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed January 30, 2023). 3. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA History Office, “VA History,” last updated May 27, 2021, https://www. va.gov/HISTORY/VA_History/Overview.asp (accessed January 28, 2023). 4. 38 U.S. Code § 1116, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1116 (accessed January 28, 2023). 5. S. 3373, Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022 (Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022), Public Law No. 117-168, 117th Congress, August 10, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ168/PLAW-117publ168.pdf (accessed January 28, 2023). 6. H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division S, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). Known variously as the Department of Veterans Affairs Nurse and Physician Assistant Retention and Income Security Enhancement Act and the VA Nurse and Physician Assistant RAISE Act. 7. See note 5, supra. — 657 — Section Four THE ECONOMY The next Administration must prioritize the economic prosperity of ordi- nary Americans. For several decades, establishment “elites” have failed the citizenry by refusing to secure the border, outsourcing manufacturing to China and elsewhere, spending recklessly, regulating constantly, and generally controlling the country from the top down rather than letting it flourish from the bottom up. The proper role of government, as was articulated nearly 250 years ago, is to secure our God-given, unalienable rights in order that we might enjoy the pursuit of happiness, the benefits of free enterprise, and the blessings of liberty. Finding the right approach to trade policy is key to the fortunes of everyday Americans. In Chapter 26, president of the Competitive Enterprise Institute Kent Lassman and former White House director of trade and manufacturing policy Peter Navarro debate what an effective conservative trade policy would look like. Lass- man argues that the best trade policy is a humble, limited-government approach that would encourage free trade with all nations. He maintains that aggressive trade policies involve an increased government role that future leftist Administra- tions will utilize to push “climate change” and “equity”-based activism. Focusing more on gross domestic product (GDP) growth than on median income, he writes that “people mistakenly believe that U.S. manufacturing and the U.S. economy are in decline” when in truth “American manufacturing output is currently at an all-time high.” Meanwhile, we continue to experience “record-setting real GDP” despite our “long-run decline in manufacturing employment.” Lassman does not think that an aggressive U.S. trade policy would lead to more manufacturing jobs. Rather, he writes, “Federal Reserve research shows” that the

Department of Defense

Moderate

Vector: 53%

Pages: 161-163AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill honors Medal of Honor recipients, which aligns with the Department of Defense's focus on recognizing military valor and supporting veterans, though it does not directly address defense policy or readiness objectives outlined in Project 2025."

Key themes:Medal of Honor recognitionVeterans supportPatriotism and national prideMilitary valor commemoration

— 128 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Constitution, Preamble, https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/preamble/ (accessed February 16, 2023). 2. U.S. Constitution, Article I, § 8, https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-1/ (accessed February 16, 2023). 3. U.S. Constitution, Article II, § 2, https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-2/ (accessed February 16, 2023). 4. Established pursuant to S. 1605, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022, Public Law No. 117-81, 117th Congress, December 27, 2021, Division A, Title X, § 1004, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ81/ PLAW-117publ81.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 5. H.R. 3684, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law No. 117-58, 117th Congress, November 15, 2021, Division G, Title IX, §§ 70901–70953, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ58/PLAW-117publ58.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 6. S. 2943, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, Public Law 114-328, 114th Congress, December 23, 2016, Division A, Title IX, § 901, https://www.congress.gov/114/statute/STATUTE-130/STATUTE-130-Pg2000. pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 7. H.R. 3622, Goldwater–Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986, Public Law No. 99-433, 99th Congress, October 1, 1986, https://www.congress.gov/99/statute/STATUTE-100/STATUTE-100-Pg992.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 8. U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Historical Sales Book, Fiscal Years 1950–2021, p. 7, https://www.dsca.mil/sites/default/files/dsca_historical_sales_book_FY21.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 9. Paul K. Kerr, “Arms Sales: Congressional Review Process,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. RL31675, updated June 10, 2022, p. 1, https://sgp.fas.org/crs/weapons/ RL31675.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 10. Keith Webster, “How to Reform America’s Military Sales Process,” The Hill Congress Blog, October 6, 2022, https://thehill.com/opinion/congress-blog/3675933-how-to-reform-americas-military-sales-process/ (accessed February 15, 2023). 11. See Thomas W. Spoehr, “The Administration and Congress Must Act Now to Counter the Worsening Military Recruiting Crisis, Heritage Foundation Issue Brief No. 5283, July 28, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/sites/ default/files/2022-07/IB5283.pdf. 12. Ibid. 13. Ronald Reagan Institute, “Reagan National Defense Survey,” conducted November 2021, p. 4, https://www. reaganfoundation.org/media/358085/rndf_survey_booklet.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 14. See Paul J. Larkin, “Protecting the Nation by Employing Military Spouses,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, June 6, 2019, https://www.heritage.org/jobs-and-labor/commentary/protecting-the-nation-employing- military-spouses. 15. See Jude Schwalbach, “Military Families Deserve Flexible Education Options,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, April 14, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/military-families-deserve- flexible-education-options. 16. See Chapter 7, “The Intelligence Community,” infra. 17. The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA); the National Security Agency (NSA); the National Geospatial- Intelligence Agency (NGA); the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO); and the intelligence and counterintelligence elements of the military services: U.S. Air Force Intelligence, U.S. Navy Intelligence, U.S. Army Intelligence, and U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, which also receive guidance and oversight from the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (USDI). 18. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 19. The Department of Energy’s Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence; the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis and the intelligence and counterintelligence elements of the U.S. Coast Guard; the Department of Justice’s Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Office of National Security Intelligence; the Department of State’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research; and the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis. — 129 — Department of Defense 20. Staff Study, IC21: Intelligence Community in the 21st Century, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, U.S. House of Representatives, 104th Congress, 1996, p. 71, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA315088.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 21. Ronald O’Rourke, “Great Power Competition: Implications for Defense—Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. R43838, updated November 8, 2022, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R43838/93 (accessed February 15, 2023). 22. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Defense Intelligence and Security: DOD Needs to Establish Oversight Expectations and to Develop Tools That Enhance Accountability, GAO-21-295, May 2021, https://www.gao.gov/ assets/gao-21-295.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 23. The U.S. military has a long history of providing support to civil authorities, particularly in response to disasters but for other purposes as well. The Defense Department currently defines defense support of civil authorities (DSCA) as “Support provided by U.S. Federal military forces, DoD civilians, DoD contract personnel, DoD Component assets, and National Guard forces (when the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Governors of the affected States, elects and requests to use those forces in Title 32, U.S.C., status) in response to requests for assistance from civil authorities for domestic emergencies, law enforcement support, and other domestic activities, or from qualifying entities for special events. Also known as civil support.” U.S. Department of Defense, Directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA),” December 29, 2010, p. 16, https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Portals/9/CG-5R/nsarc/DoDD%203025.18%20Defense%20Support%20 of%20Civil%20Authorities.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 24. U.S. Army, “Who We Are: The Army’s Vision and Strategy,” https://www.army.mil/about/ (accessed February 17, 2023). 25. “[T]he Army’s internal assessment must be balanced against its own statements that unit training is focused on company-level operations [reflective of counterintelligence requirements] rather than battalion or brigade operations [much less division or corps to meet large-scale ground combat operations against a peer competitor such as Russia or China]. Consequently, how these ‘ready’ brigade combat teams would perform in combat operations is an open question.” “Executive Summary” in 2023 Index of U.S. Military Strength, ed. Dakota L. Wood (Washington: The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 16, http://thf_media.s3.amazonaws. com/2022/Military_Index/2023_IndexOfUSMilitaryStrength.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 26. For background on the USN’s fleet size, see Brent D. Sadler, “Rebuilding America’s Military: The United States Navy,” Heritage Foundation Special Report No. 242, February 18, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/ files/2021-02/SR242.pdf, and Ronald O’Rourke, “Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. RL32665, December 21, 2022, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32665 (accessed February 15, 2023). 27. The Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) is the process by which the services develop and the Joint Staff approves the requirements for major defense acquisitions. See Defense Acquisition University, “Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDA),” https://www.dau. edu/acquipedia/pages/articledetails.aspx#!371 (accessed February 15, 2023). 28. The board would seek to balance a mix of active military and civilians with expertise in and responsibility for major acquisitions and former military and civilians with experience in strategy and acquisitions. The proposed composition would include the Vice Chief of Naval Operations as Chairman, with three-star level membership from the Joint Staff, the Navy and Defense Acquisition Executives, and the Naval Sea Systems Command. In addition, there would be four-star retired naval officers/Navy civil servants as members, one each named by the Chairmen of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees, the Secretary of the Navy, and the Secretary of Defense. Finally, there would be a member appointed by the Secretary of the Navy who had previous senior experience in the defense industry. 29. See James Mattis, Secretary of Defense, Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America: Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge, U.S. Department of Defense, https:// dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf (accessed February 17, 2023), and U.S. Department of Defense, 2022 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America Including the 2022 Nuclear Posture Review and the 2022 Missile Defense Review, https://oldcc.gov/ resource/2022-national-defense-strategy (accessed February 17, 2023).

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 54%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 186 focuses on establishing a monument to honor Medal of Honor recipients on the National Mall, which is unrelated to the Department of Health and Human Services policies outlined in Project 2025, such as Medicaid reform, abortion policy, or healthcare regulation. There is no thematic or policy overlap between the bill and the specified HHS section."

— 500 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 32. Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net.” 33. Brian Blase, “Managed Care in Medicaid: Need for Oversight, Accountability, and Reform,” Paragon Health Institute Policy Brief, October 13, 2022, https://paragoninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/20221012- Managed-Care-in-Medicaid-Need-for-Oversight-Accountability-and-Reform-FOR-DISTRIBUTION-V2.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 34. Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net.” 35. 42 U.S. Code § 1315, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1315 (accessed March 17, 2023). 36. Chad D. Savage and Lee S. Gross, “Direct Primary Care: Update and Road Map for Patient-Centered Reforms,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3635, June 28, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/ files/2021-06/BG3635.pdf. 37. H.R. 133, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Public Law No. 116-260, 116th Congress, December 27, 2020, Division BB, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/116/plaws/publ260/PLAW-116publ260.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 38. Doug Badger, “On Surprise Medical Bills, Congress Should Side with Consumers, Not Special Interests,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, January 31, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/ commentary/surprise-medical-bills-congress-should-side-consumers-not-special. 39. Edmund F. Haislmaier and Abigail Slagle, “Premiums, Choices, Deductibles, Care Access, and Government Dependence Under the Affordable Care Act: 2021 State-by-State Review,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3668, November 2, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/BG3668.pdf. 40. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Transparency in Coverage,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 219 (November 12, 2020), pp. 72158–72310, https://www.govinfo.gov/ content/pkg/FR-2020-11-12/pdf/2020-24591.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 41. David N. Bernstein and Robert E. Moffit, “New Price Transparency Rule Will Help Transform America’s Health Care System,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 1, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/health-care- reform/commentary/new-price-transparency-rule-will-help-transform-americas-health-care. 42. Sluzala and Haislmaier, “Lessons from COVID-19: How Policymakers Should Reform the Regulation of Clinical Testing.” 43. Ibid. 44. Most recently enacted in H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division H, Title V, §§ 506–507, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/ PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 45. President Joseph R. Biden Jr., Executive Order 14079, “Securing Access to Reproductive and Other Healthcare Services,” August 3, 2022, in Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 154 (August 11, 2022), pp. 49505–49507, https:// www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-11/pdf/2022-17420.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 46. Planned Parenthood, 2020–2021 Annual Report, p. 27, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/uploads/ filer_public/40/8f/408fc2ad-c8c2-48da-ad87-be5cc257d370/211214-ppfa-annualreport-20-21-c3-digital.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 47. Ibid., pp. 30 and 31. Total revenue of $1,714.4 million (p. 30) minus $1,580.7 million in total expenses (p. 31) yields $133,7 million. 48. Ibid., p. 28. 49. Ibid., p. 30. 50. H.R. 372, Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 17, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/hr372/BILLS-118hr372ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 51. 42 U.S. Code § 18023, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/18023 (accessed March 17, 2023). 52. H.R. 3128, Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, Public Law No. 99-272, 99th Congress, April 7, 1986, Title IX, Subtitle A, Part 1, Subpart B, § 9121, https://www.congress.gov/99/statute/STATUTE-100/ STATUTE-100-Pg82.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 53. H.R. 8070, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Public Law No. 93-112, 93rd Congress, September 26, 1973, https://www. congress.gov/93/statute/STATUTE-87/STATUTE-87-Pg355.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023).

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Minimal

Vector: 53%

Pages: 648-650AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 186 focuses on establishing a monument to honor Medal of Honor recipients on the National Mall, which is unrelated to the Project 2025 policy objective of reforming the Department of Labor's Office of Foreign Labor Certification to improve visa-related labor-market monitoring and accountability. There is no thematic or policy overlap between commemorative works and labor certification restructuring."

— 616 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Improve Visa-Related Labor-Market Monitoring DOL’s Office of Foreign Labor Certification plays an important role in the approval of H-visa applications, but it is currently housed in the Employment and Training Administration, which is DOL’s primary grant-making division. l OFLC should be moved out of ETA and made directly accountable to the Secretary with a politically accountable Director. CONCLUSION The good of the American family is at the heart of conservative labor policy recommendations. The longstanding tradition of a strong work ethic in American culture must be encouraged and strengthened by policies that promote family-sus- taining jobs. By eliminating the policies promoted by the DEI agenda, promoting pro-life policies that support family life, expanding available apprenticeship programs including by encouraging the role of religious organizations in appren- ticeships, making family-sustaining jobs accessible, simplifying employment requirements, and allowing employers to prefer American citizens when making hiring decisions, among the other policy recommendations discussed above, we can begin to secure a future in which the American worker, and by extension the American family, can thrive and prosper. AUTHOR’S NOTE: Many contributors, listed at the front of this volume, deserve credit for this work, but Oren Cass, Rachel Greszler, Rachel Morrison, Caleb Orr, and Jonathan Wolfson deserve special mention. The author alone assumes responsibility for the content of this chapter, and no views expressed herein should be attributed to any other individual. — 617 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies ENDNOTES 1. Gretchen Livingston and Anna Brown, “Intermarriage in the U.S. Fifty Years after Loving v. Virginia,” Pew Research Center, May 18, 2017, https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/05/18/intermarriage-in-the- u-s-50-years-after-loving-v-virginia/ (accessed March 4, 2023). 2. President Lyndon B. Johnson, Executive Order 11246, “Equal Employment Opportunity,” https://www. presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-11246-equal-employment-opportunity (accessed March 7, 2023). 3. Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, Public Law, 95-555. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 4. Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Public Law No. 117-328, div. II, 136 Stat. 4459 (2022). 5. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. 6. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, No. 19-1392, June 24, 2022, https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf (accessed March 7, 2023). 7. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. Ch. 18 § 1001 et seq. 8. Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, 42 U.S.C. Ch. 21B § 2000bb et seq. 9. Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 203. 10. Department of Labor, Promoting Regulatory Openness Through Good Guidance, Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 168, August 28, 2020, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-08-28/pdf/2020-18500.pdf (accessed March 7, 2023). 11. Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. Ch. 5, subchapter 1, § 500 et seq. 12. Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. Ch. 6 § 601 et seq. 13. Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13932, “Modernizing and Reforming the Assessment and Hiring of Federal Job Candidates,” Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 187 (July 1, 2020) pp. 39457–39459, https://www.federalregister. gov/documents/2020/07/01/2020-14337/modernizing-and-reforming-the-assessment-and-hiring-of-federal- job-candidates (accessed March 7, 2023). 14. Workforce Investment and Opportunity Act, Public Law 113-128. 15. Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, S.3548, 116th Congress, 2nd Sess. 16. Federal Unemployment Tax Act, I.R.C., Ch. 23. 17. American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Public Law 117-2. 18. Teamwork for Employees and Managers (TEAM) Act of 2022, S. 3585, 117th Congress, 2nd Sess. 19. Worker’s Choice Act of 2019, H.R. 5147, 116th Congress, 1st Sess. 20. F. Vincent Vernuccio, “Back to Business,” October 8, 2020, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/ back-to-business (accessed March 4, 2023). 21. Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 203. 22. Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. Ch. 15 § 651 et seq. 23. Davis–Bacon Act of 1931, Public Law 71-798. 24. Social Security Act of 1935, 42 U.S.C. Ch. 7. 25. The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Public Law 99-603.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Moore, Blake D.

Fair Treatment of Religious Organizations Act of 2026

119/hr/9722

MAPWaters Act of 2025

119/hr/187

Ensuring Patient Access to Critical Breakthrough Products Act

119/hr/5343

Back to All Bills