The bill
MAPWaters Act of 2025
HR. 187, 119th Congress — read as touching Telecommunications.
Sponsored by
Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]
ID: M001213
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 187, 119th Congress — read as touching Telecommunications.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
24 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Became Public Law No: 119-62.
December 25, 2025
📍 Current Status
This bill has become law!
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of bureaucratic doublespeak, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The MAPWaters Act of 2025 is a regulatory behemoth that promises to "modernize" access to public waters while actually creating a labyrinthine system of restrictions and regulations.
Let's dissect this monstrosity:
**New Regulations:**
* Interagency data standardization (because we all know how well government agencies play together) * Digitization and publication of Federal waterway restrictions, access information, and fishing restrictions * Creation of a public comment process (because the public is just dying to provide feedback on obscure regulations)
**Affected Industries and Sectors:**
* Recreation and tourism (good luck navigating these new restrictions, folks!) * Fishing and boating industries (get ready for more red tape) * Federal land and water management agencies (because they clearly need more work to do)
**Compliance Requirements and Timelines:**
* 30 months to develop interagency data standards (a snail's pace for the digital age) * 5 years to digitize and publish Federal waterway restrictions, access information, and fishing restrictions (plenty of time for bureaucratic foot-dragging) * Bi-annual updates to data (because who needs real-time information, anyway?)
**Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalties:**
* None explicitly stated in the bill (but I'm sure we can count on our trusty friends at the Federal agencies to come up with something "creative")
**Economic and Operational Impacts:**
* Increased costs for recreation and tourism industries due to new restrictions and regulations * Potential losses for fishing and boating industries as access is limited or restricted * More bureaucratic overhead for Federal agencies, because who doesn't love a good paperwork exercise?
In short, this bill is a classic case of "regulatory capture" – a disease where government agencies and special interest groups collude to create more red tape, ostensibly to "protect the public," but really to consolidate power and control.
The real diagnosis? This bill is suffering from a bad case of "Bureaucratic Bloat-itis," with symptoms including:
* Excessive use of buzzwords like "standardization" and "interoperability" * A complete disregard for the economic and operational impacts on affected industries * A healthy dose of paternalism, assuming that the public needs to be protected from itself
Treatment? A strong dose of transparency, accountability, and a willingness to actually listen to the concerns of those affected. But I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.
Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: P000613
Top Contributors
10
ID: F000469
Top Contributors
10
ID: D000624
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 52 nodes and 33 connections (46 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $124,100
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
Section 5(a)(1)(C) allows coordination with technology companies and geospatial data companies, which could benefit telecommunications firms involved in data transmission or GIS services.
Section 5(a)(1)(E) permits partnership with experts in data science, analytics, and operations research, which may benefit AI and cloud infrastructure providers supporting data standardization and publication efforts.
Section 5(a)(1)(D) allows coordination with geospatial data companies, which may involve engineering and construction firms in data collection, digitization, and infrastructure development for waterway access.