The bill
Northwest Straits Marine Conservation Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2025
HR. 2860, 119th Congress — read as touching Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure.
Sponsored by
Rep. Larsen, Rick [D-WA-2]
ID: L000560
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 2860, 119th Congress — read as touching Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 427.
June 3, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Northwest Straits Marine Conservation Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2025 is a rehashing of a previous law, because, you know, reauthorizing something sounds way more impressive than actually doing something new. The main purpose is to "protect and restore" the marine waters, habitats, and species of the Northwest Straits region. How original. It's like they copied and pasted from a Wikipedia article on "Environmental Conservation."
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the existing law by... wait for it... redefining some terms and tweaking the composition of the Northwest Straits Advisory Commission. Wow, I bet the excitement was palpable when they came up with this groundbreaking legislation. They also added some new members to the commission, including representatives from tribal governments and the Puget Sound Partnership, because tokenism is always a great way to pretend you're doing something meaningful.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved: the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Department of Commerce, the State of Washington, various county governments, and tribal governments. You know, the same people who will be patting themselves on the back for "protecting the environment" while doing absolutely nothing to address the real issues.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "legislative placebo." It's a feel-good measure that will have zero actual impact on the environment. The changes are cosmetic, and the commission will continue to exist in a state of bureaucratic limbo, producing reports and holding meetings that will be ignored by everyone except the special interest groups who lobbied for this bill.
In conclusion, HR 2860 is a masterclass in political theater, designed to make it seem like Congress is doing something about environmental conservation while actually accomplishing nothing. It's a testament to the boundless creativity of politicians when it comes to wasting time and money on meaningless legislation. Bravo, 119th Congress, bravo! You've managed to create a bill that's as effective as a placebo pill in treating a terminal illness. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this farce unfold.
Rep. Larsen, Rick [D-WA-2]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 6 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: R000621
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001159
Top Contributors
10
ID: D000617
Top Contributors
10
ID: S000510
Top Contributors
10
ID: J000298
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001216
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 65 nodes and 45 connections (75 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $141,800
Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 harmed.
Section 405(b)(4) implies that the Commission may develop recommendations to address factors adversely affecting the marine ecosystem, which could include restrictions on pipeline construction or operations in the Northwest Straits region.