Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure
Oil and gas pipelines, midstream operators, LNG export terminals, storage. Enbridge, Kinder Morgan, Williams Companies.
Bills that help Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure
- Unlocking our Domestic LNG Potential Act of 2025 Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11] · confidence 0.95
Section 2 amends the Natural Gas Act to give FERC exclusive authority to approve/deny LNG export/import facilities and deem such actions consistent with the public interest, directly benefiting pipelines & energy infrastructure companies involved in LNG terminals and natural gas export/import.
- Next Generation Pipelines Research and Development Act Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14] · confidence 0.95
Section 4 establishes the Advanced Pipeline Materials and Technologies Demonstration Initiative, which provides financial assistance to eligible entities for demonstration projects on pipeline systems, components, and related technologies, including liquefied natural gas facilities and storage. This directly benefits the energy infrastructure industry (pipelines, midstream operators, LNG terminals) by funding R&D and deployment of next-generation pipeline technologies.
- Protect LNG Act of 2025 Rep. Hunt, Wesley [R-TX-38] · confidence 0.95
Section 3(a) states that civil actions relating to environmental review under the Natural Gas Act or NEPA shall not affect the validity of a permit, license, or approval issued to a covered facility (LNG facility). Section 3(b) further provides that if a court finds the environmental review violates law, the court shall remand to the agency rather than vacate the permit, and the agency shall continue processing covered applications. This reduces litigation risk and delays for LNG export faciliti
- PIPES Act of 2025 Rep. Graves, Sam [R-MO-6] · confidence 0.95
The bill enhances pipeline safety regulations, provides grants for natural gas distribution system upgrades (Sec. 2(i)), and authorizes appropriations for pipeline safety programs, directly benefiting midstream operators and pipeline companies involved in oil, gas, and hazardous liquid transport.
- Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026 Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4] · confidence 0.95
Division B, Title I, Corps of Engineers--Civil, operation and maintenance: $3,245,249,000 from Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund for Federal share of eligible operations and maintenance costs for coastal harbors and channels, and $416,760,000 for donor and energy ports per section 102 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020.
- Pipeline Cybersecurity Preparedness Act Rep. Weber, Randy K. Sr. [R-TX-14] · confidence 0.95
Section 2 establishes a program for physical security and cybersecurity for pipelines and liquefied natural gas facilities, which directly benefits energy infrastructure companies by improving security, providing technical tools, and developing workforce curricula.
- SPEED Act Rep. Westerman, Bruce [R-AR-4] · confidence 0.95
The bill directly targets midstream energy infrastructure by streamlining NEPA reviews for pipelines, LNG terminals, and storage facilities. Sections 2(b)-(g) reduce procedural hurdles, set firm timelines for agency actions, and limit judicial review—key pain points for midstream operators like Kinder Morgan and Williams Companies. This constitutes a clear regulatory benefit that lowers costs and accelerates project deployment.
- PIPELINE Safety Act of 2025 Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX] · confidence 0.95
The bill directly enhances pipeline safety through multiple provisions: reauthorizing and increasing funding for pipeline safety programs (Title I), modernizing pipeline safety standards (Title II), streamlining oversight (Title III), improving safety of emerging gases like hydrogen and CO2 (Title IV), and improving emergency response and transparency (Title V). Specific provisions include inspection of breakout tanks (Sec. 201), risk assessment obligations (Sec. 202), pipeline safety enhancemen
- Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions". Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11] · confidence 0.90
The EPA rule targeted petroleum and natural gas systems, which includes midstream infrastructure such as pipelines, storage, and LNG terminals. Disapproving the rule avoids imposing emissions charges on these systems, benefiting energy infrastructure operators.
- Bureau of Land Management Mineral Spacing Act Rep. Bice, Stephanie I. [R-OK-5] · confidence 0.90
By exempting oil and gas exploration and production activities from federal permitting requirements (including NEPA, NHPA, and ESA compliance) under Section 2(r)(2), the bill reduces delays and costs for midstream operators and pipeline companies that rely on timely access to federal mineral estates for infrastructure development.
- Promoting Cross-border Energy Infrastructure Act Rep. Fedorchak, Julie [R-ND-At Large] · confidence 0.90
The bill governs border-crossing facilities for oil, natural gas pipelines, and electric transmission. Section 2(a)(2)(B)(i) assigns FERC as the relevant agency for oil/gas pipelines, and Section 2(d) removes Presidential permit requirements for pipelines and transmission lines, reducing regulatory hurdles for midstream operators like Kinder Morgan and Enbridge.
- Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act Rep. Hudson, Richard [R-NC-9] · confidence 0.90
Section 2(b) promotes interagency coordination and expedites NEPA review for natural gas pipeline authorizations under the Natural Gas Act, which benefits pipeline operators by reducing delays and regulatory uncertainty.
- Energy Choice Act Rep. Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23] · confidence 0.90
Section 2 protects pipelines, LNG terminals, and midstream operators by forbidding state/local limits on transportation/distribution of energy services based on source, enabling fossil fuel infrastructure expansion.
- PERMIT Act Rep. Collins, Mike [R-GA-10] · confidence 0.90
Section 5 improves water quality certifications for American energy infrastructure, and Section 13 includes linear pipeline projects in nationwide permits, benefiting pipelines and energy infrastructure.
- Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 Rep. Fleischmann, Charles J. "Chuck" [R-TN-3] · confidence 0.90
Title I includes $84,883,000 from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund for construction of facilities under the Dredged Material Disposal Facilities program, and $3,381,412,000 for operation and maintenance of coastal harbors and channels, benefiting pipelines and energy infrastructure.
- Offshore Lands Authorities Act of 2025 Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3] · confidence 0.90
By nullifying withdrawals and limiting future Presidential authority to withdraw offshore lands, the bill increases the likelihood of new oil and gas leasing and development offshore. This would drive demand for midstream infrastructure such as pipelines, storage, and LNG export terminals to transport and process newly produced hydrocarbons, benefiting energy infrastructure companies.
- Marine Fisheries Habitat Protection Act Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4] · confidence 0.90
Section 2(a)(2) includes pipelines and associated equipment in the definition of inactive structures eligible for reefing in place, allowing midstream operators to avoid removal costs and repurpose infrastructure as artificial reefs.
- To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to allow Federal agencies to rely on certain previously completed environmental assessments and environmental impact statements to satisfy the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and for other purposes. Rep. Valadao, David G. [R-CA-22] · confidence 0.90
Section 2(b) directly aids pipelines, LNG terminals, and storage projects by allowing agencies to rely on prior NEPA documents for substantially similar actions, reducing delays and costs.
- Energy Emergency Leadership Act Rep. Lee, Laurel M. [R-FL-15] · confidence 0.90
Section 2(a)(12)(A) assigns responsibilities for energy infrastructure security and resilience, which benefits energy infrastructure firms by enhancing their operational security and federal support.
- Energy Threat Analysis Center Act of 2026 Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14] · confidence 0.90
Section 2(1)(B) amends the Energy Sector Operational Support for Cyberresilience Program to strengthen collective defense, response, and resilience of the U.S. energy sector, including enhancing collaboration between government and energy sector to analyze threats and mitigate operational impacts to energy systems, which benefits energy infrastructure operators such as pipelines, midstream operators, and LNG export terminals.
- Pipeline Security Act Rep. Johnson, Julie [D-TX-32] · confidence 0.90
Section 2(a) codifies TSA responsibility for securing pipeline transportation and pipeline facilities against cybersecurity threats and terrorism, which benefits pipeline operators by establishing federal security standards and oversight.
- Offshore Parity Act of 2026 Rep. Ezell, Mike [R-MS-4] · confidence 0.90
Section 3(a) includes delegation of authority for 'oil, gas, and other energy activities' on expanded submerged lands, which encompasses midstream infrastructure such as pipelines, storage, and related facilities necessary for production and transport. By enabling state management of leases and revenue collection, the bill facilitates development of offshore energy infrastructure in the expanded zones, benefiting midstream operators.
- Sloan Canyon Conservation and Lateral Pipeline Act Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1] · confidence 0.90
Section 3(b) grants the Southern Nevada Water Authority a right-of-way for water pipeline infrastructure, powerline, facility, and access road rights-of-way outside the Conservation Area, facilitating construction and operation of water transmission and related facilities, which benefits energy infrastructure operators involved in pipeline and utility development.
- Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 20) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Gas-fired Instantaneous Water Heaters"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 35) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions"; and providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034. Rep. Houchin, Erin [R-IN-9] · confidence 0.90
Same as above: the EPA rule pertains to petroleum and natural gas systems, which includes midstream infrastructure such as pipelines, storage, and LNG terminals. Disapproval would relieve these entities of the waste emissions charge, benefiting energy infrastructure operators.
- Taiwan Energy Security and Anti-Embargo Act of 2026 Sen. Ricketts, Pete [R-NE] · confidence 0.90
Section 3 (SEC. 5540B) supports liquefied natural gas export and storage infrastructure projects linked to Taiwan, benefiting midstream operators and infrastructure entities.
- A bill to amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to clarify ambiguous provisions and facilitate a more efficient, effective, and timely environmental review process, and for other purposes. Sen. Kennedy, John [R-LA] · confidence 0.90
Section 2(g) inserts 'energy,' into NEPA Section 204(4), which may expedite reviews for pipelines, LNG terminals, and other energy infrastructure under the Council's oversight.
- A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions". Sen. Hoeven, John [R-ND] · confidence 0.90
The EPA rule targeted petroleum and natural gas systems, which includes midstream infrastructure such as pipelines, storage, and LNG terminals; disapproval relieves those entities of the charge, benefiting the energy infrastructure industry.
- A resolution supporting the goals and ideals of National Safe Digging Month. Sen. Young, Todd [R-IN] · confidence 0.90
Resolution supports National Safe Digging Month and encourages contacting 811 before digging to protect underground utility infrastructure, including pipelines, electric, gas, telecommunications, fiber, water, sewer, and cable television lines. This benefits energy infrastructure operators by reducing damage to their assets.
- Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan". Rep. Fedorchak, Julie [R-ND-At Large] · confidence 0.85
By overturning the BLM resource management plan that may have limited pipeline or midstream infrastructure approvals, the disapproval likely facilitates energy infrastructure projects in the area, benefiting midstream operators.
- To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund. Rep. Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large] · confidence 0.85
Section 1(b)(1) addresses effects on Fund obligations including routine operations, maintenance, and replacement of critical infrastructure, which supports energy infrastructure related to hydropower.
- GRID Power Act Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12] · confidence 0.85
By streamlining interconnection for dispatchable power projects, the bill facilitates grid upgrades and new transmission connections, benefiting energy infrastructure firms involved in transmission and grid modernization.
- FLASH Act Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6] · confidence 0.85
Section 101(e) requires deployment of fencing, surveillance, and related technology along navigable roads, which benefits energy infrastructure companies involved in pipeline security, surveillance tech, and midstream operations that may be deployed for border security.
- To amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to establish a conclusive presumption that a State concurs to certain activities, and for other purposes. Rep. Kiley, Kevin [R-CA-3] · confidence 0.85
Section 1(j)(4)(D)(ii) includes 'critical infrastructure project' as a covered activity, and (E)-(H) define critical infrastructure and related projects. This benefits energy infrastructure companies (e.g., pipelines, LNG terminals) as their projects involving planning, construction, maintenance, or improvement of critical infrastructure (including energy sectors) would be subject to the conclusive presumption, reducing state-level delays.
- Defending our Dams Act Rep. Newhouse, Dan [R-WA-4] · confidence 0.85
Section 2(a) bars Federal funds from being used to study or allow breach or alteration of the Lower Snake River dams, which are key components of regional energy infrastructure (hydroelectric power generation and navigation). This protects the continued operation of these dams, benefiting entities involved in energy infrastructure operation and maintenance.
- Recycling Infrastructure and Accessibility Act of 2025 Rep. Miller-Meeks, Mariannette [R-IA-1] · confidence 0.85
Section 2(g)(3) allows leveraging public-private partnerships to reduce costs of collecting and transporting recyclable materials, which may involve energy infrastructure such as transport logistics and related facilities, benefiting companies in pipelines and energy infrastructure.
- CORE Act of 2025 Rep. Hunt, Wesley [R-TX-38] · confidence 0.85
The bill's focus on assessing and standardizing offshore hydrocarbon resource exploration and production (Sections 2 and 3) implies support for midstream infrastructure needed to transport, process, and export offshore oil and gas, benefiting pipeline and energy infrastructure companies.
- LIZARD Act of 2025 Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11] · confidence 0.85
By delisting the dunes sagebrush lizard, the bill reduces ESA-related delays and mitigation requirements for pipelines and midstream infrastructure in the lizard's range, benefiting energy infrastructure companies.
- Protecting American Energy Production Act Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11] · confidence 0.85
By protecting hydraulic fracturing operations, the bill supports continued production that drives demand for pipelines, storage, and midstream infrastructure used to transport oil and gas.
- To terminate certain tariffs imposed pursuant to emergency authorities and require congressional approval for the imposition of similar tariffs, and for other purposes. Rep. Sánchez, Linda T. [D-CA-38] · confidence 0.85
Section 2 terminates tariffs on steel and aluminum, which are critical inputs for pipelines, LNG terminals, and storage facilities; removal lowers capital costs for midstream operators.
Bills that harm Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure
- Enhanced Iran Sanctions Act of 2025 Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17] · confidence 0.90
Section 4(a) covers transactions related to oil, condensates, petroleum or petrochemical products, which includes midstream infrastructure like pipelines, storage, and LNG terminals used for such products, thus harming energy infrastructure firms.
- To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to withdraw the outer Continental Shelf in the Mid-Atlantic Planning Area from disposition, and for other purposes. Rep. Ross, Deborah K. [D-NC-2] · confidence 0.90
By blocking oil and gas leases in the Mid-Atlantic OCS, the bill impedes development of related infrastructure such as pipelines and offshore platforms, harming midstream operators.
- Sustainable International Financial Institutions Act of 2025 Rep. Huffman, Jared [D-CA-2] · confidence 0.90
Section 2001(d)(1) explicitly includes transportation (including pipelines transporting gas, oil, or products thereof) in the definition of fossil fuel activity. Sections 2001(a)(2), 2001(b), and 3 prohibit US support for such activity, affecting pipelines, LNG export terminals, storage, and other midstream energy infrastructure.
- To require regulation of wastes associated with the exploration, development, or production of crude oil, natural gas, or geothermal energy under the Solid Waste Disposal Act, and for other purposes. Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14] · confidence 0.90
Section 2(a) and (b) apply to wastes associated with crude oil, natural gas, or geothermal energy exploration, development, or production, which includes wastes generated by midstream operators such as pipelines, storage, and LNG terminals. Regulating these wastes as hazardous or imposing new facility criteria under Subtitle D will increase compliance costs for energy infrastructure companies handling such wastes.
- To repeal the exemption for hydraulic fracturing in the Safe Drinking Water Act, and for other purposes. Rep. DeGette, Diana [D-CO-1] · confidence 0.90
Section 2(a) includes hydraulic fracturing related to oil, gas, or geothermal production activities within the definition of underground injection subject to regulation, affecting midstream operators involved in fracturing operations and associated infrastructure.
- To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to require testing of underground sources of drinking water in connection with hydraulic fracturing operations, and for other purposes. Rep. Schakowsky, Janice D. [D-IL-9] · confidence 0.90
Section 2(a)(3) applies to hydraulic fracturing operations related to oil, gas, or geothermal production, affecting midstream operators involved in injection activities, imposing testing and reporting burdens.
- Shenandoah Mountain Act Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA] · confidence 0.90
Section 3(o)(1)(E) withdraws Federal land within the National Scenic Area from 'designation of new utility corridors, utility rights-of-way, or communications sites', which would prohibit new pipelines, transmission lines, and related energy infrastructure on those lands.
- SHADOW Fleet Sanctions Act of 2026 Sen. Risch, James E. [R-ID] · confidence 0.90
The bill imposes sanctions on foreign persons that own or operate ports accepting Russian-origin oil above the price cap (Sec. 113) and on vessels transporting Russian-origin petroleum products in circumvention of sanctions (Sec. 111). This directly targets midstream energy infrastructure involved in oil transport, storage, and terminal operations, which falls under the energy_infrastructure industry.
- Sustainable International Financial Institutions Act of 2025 Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR] · confidence 0.90
Section 2001(d)(1) explicitly includes transportation (including pipelines transporting gas, oil, or products thereof) in the definition of fossil fuel activity. Sections 2001(a)(2), 2001(b), and 3 prohibit US support for such activity, which would restrict financing for oil and gas pipelines, LNG export terminals, storage, and other midstream infrastructure.
- Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act Rep. Gimenez, Carlos A. [R-FL-28] · confidence 0.85
Section 2(a) bars DHS from procuring batteries from specified entities, which include large battery producers that also supply grid storage and energy infrastructure; this limits DHS ability to procure such systems, harming the energy infrastructure industry.
- Compressed Gas Cylinder Safety and Oversight Improvements Act of 2025 Rep. Balderson, Troy [R-OH-12] · confidence 0.85
Section 2(b)(1) limits approval periods for foreign cylinder manufacturers to 1 year (unless 5-year approval granted). Cylinders are used in transporting hazardous materials, including those used in energy infrastructure (e.g., for natural gas, hydrogen, or other energy-related gases). This regulation imposes compliance costs and operational uncertainty on foreign suppliers, affecting midstream operators and pipeline companies that rely on such cylinders, thus imposing a clear cost.