The bill
SPEED Act
HR. 4776, 119th Congress — read as touching Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure.
Sponsored by
Rep. Westerman, Bruce [R-AR-4]
ID: W000821
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 4776, 119th Congress — read as touching Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
December 17, 2025
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H.R. 4776 Engrossed in House (EH)]
<DOC> 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 4776
_______________________________________________________________________
AN ACT
To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to clarify ambiguous provisions and facilita...
Rep. Westerman, Bruce [R-AR-4]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
No individual contributions found
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: G000592
Top Contributors
10
ID: C001063
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001212
Top Contributors
10
ID: G000581
Top Contributors
10
ID: H001096
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001322
Top Contributors
10
ID: E000300
Top Contributors
10
ID: G000600
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
ID: D000230
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001215
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 98 nodes and 45 connections (89 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $149,150
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 6 helped.
The bill directly targets midstream energy infrastructure by streamlining NEPA reviews for pipelines, LNG terminals, and storage facilities. Sections 2(b)-(g) reduce procedural hurdles, set firm timelines for agency actions, and limit judicial review—key pain points for midstream operators like Kinder Morgan and Williams Companies. This constitutes a clear regulatory benefit that lowers costs and accelerates project deployment.
The bill amends NEPA to streamline environmental review processes, including limiting scope of review, setting deadlines for agency actions, and restricting judicial review. These changes reduce procedural burdens and delays for federal permitting of projects, which benefits oil and gas extraction, refining, and infrastructure projects that require federal authorizations (e.g., pipelines, drilling on federal lands). Sections 2(b)-(g) and 3 collectively facilitate faster approvals, constituting a
Electric utilities frequently undergo NEPA review for transmission lines, substations, and generation facilities (including natural gas and renewable projects) that involve federal lands or permits. The bill's reforms to expedite environmental reviews and reduce litigation risk provide a procedural benefit, lowering compliance costs and shortening timelines for infrastructure investments.
Construction and engineering firms (e.g., Bechtel, Fluor) rely on timely federal permitting for large infrastructure projects. The bill's NEPA reforms reduce procedural delays and litigation risk, directly benefiting firms involved in building energy, transportation, and water projects that require federal authorizations. This constitutes a market expansion through faster project execution.
While renewable energy projects benefit from faster permitting, the bill's NEPA reforms apply uniformly to all federal actions. Wind and solar projects on federal lands or requiring federal permits (e.g., transmission interconnection) would experience reduced review timelines and legal challenges. However, the benefit is slightly less direct than for fossil fuels due to potential trade-offs in review thoroughness, though the procedural efficiencies still constitute a net benefit.
Nuclear power projects (including SMRs) require extensive federal licensing and NEPA review. The bill's streamlining of environmental review processes, imposition of deadlines, and restriction on judicial review would reduce delays and costs associated with federal authorizations, providing a clear benefit to nuclear developers seeking federal permits or approvals.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Westerman, Bruce [R-AR-4])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
Tradeable Energy Performance Standards Act
Fire Safe Electrical Corridors Act of 2025
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers".