Finding ORE Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/2969
Last Updated: June 24, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Wittman, Robert J. [R-VA-1]

ID: W000804

Follow the money

The bill

Finding ORE Act

HR. 2969, 119th Congress — read as touching Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure.

The sponsor

Rep. Wittman, Robert J. [R-VA-1]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$151,800 raised

24 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Energy and Related Commissions" section, p. 422-424 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Subcommittee Hearings Held

February 23, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the Finding ORE Act (HR 2969). Let's dissect this farce and uncover the real motivations behind it.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The bill's stated purpose is to allow the Secretary of the Interior to enter into memoranda of understanding with foreign countries for scientific and technical cooperation in mapping critical minerals and rare earth elements. The objectives are to increase supply chain security, promote private sector investment, and protect mapping data from unauthorized access.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill authorizes the Secretary to negotiate MOUs with partner foreign countries, which will enable them to map reserves of critical minerals and rare earth elements. It also ensures that US companies get the right of first refusal in developing these resources, while facilitating private sector investment through preferential financing.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The usual suspects are involved: the Secretary of the Interior, partner foreign countries, US companies, institutions of higher education, research centers, and private sector actors. It's a veritable who's who of special interests and potential beneficiaries of this legislation.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

Now, let's get to the real diagnosis. This bill is not about promoting national security or sustainable development; it's about greasing the wheels for US companies to exploit foreign resources while ensuring they maintain control over the supply chain. The "right of first refusal" provision is a clever way to ensure that US companies get preferential treatment, while the "preferential financing" clause is a thinly veiled attempt to funnel taxpayer dollars into the pockets of private sector actors.

The bill's emphasis on protecting mapping data from unauthorized access is also telling. It suggests that the real concern is not about national security, but rather about maintaining control over valuable resources and preventing other countries from accessing them.

In short, this bill is a classic case of "resource nationalism" masquerading as a noble effort to promote sustainable development. The Finding ORE Act is a symptom of a deeper disease: the insatiable greed of corporations and governments, which will stop at nothing to exploit resources for their own benefit.

As I always say, "Everyone lies." In this case, the sponsors of this bill are lying about its true intentions. It's time to call out this legislative charade for what it is – a thinly veiled attempt to serve the interests of corporate America and the powerful elites who pull the strings in Washington.

Related Topics

Trade & International CommerceForeign Aid & Diplomacy
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Wittman, Robert J. [R-VA-1]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$151,800
19 donors
PACs
$6,600
Organizations
$6,600
Committees
$0
Individuals
$138,600
1
THE CHICKASAW NATION
2 transactions
$6,600
1
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
1 transaction
$3,300
2
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300

No committee contributions found

1
KEHOE, MICHAEL PATRICK
1 transaction
$13,200
2
GIFFORD, BILLY
2 transactions
$13,200
3
PAYNE, DANIEL E.
2 transactions
$13,200
4
CASEY, ARTHUR S.
2 transactions
$13,200
5
KILMER, ANDREA
2 transactions
$13,200
6
KANTNER, CHRIS
1 transaction
$6,600
7
HOLLAND, BRIAN K.
1 transaction
$6,600
8
HOLLAND, JENNIFER
1 transaction
$6,600
9
MCCONN, RICHARD
1 transaction
$6,600
10
MADERA, PAUL
1 transaction
$6,600
11
SHAH, RAJ
1 transaction
$6,600
12
THOMPSON, BRUCE
1 transaction
$6,600
13
WITTERSHEIM, RAYMOND
1 transaction
$6,600
14
KELLY, SUSAN
1 transaction
$6,600
15
SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN A.
1 transaction
$6,600
16
SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE H.
1 transaction
$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14]

ID: C001066

Top Contributors

10

1
SEMINOLE TRIBE
OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL
$3,300
Jun 30, 2024
2
SEMINOLE TRIBE
OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL
$3,300
Aug 25, 2023
3
BGR PAC
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$925
Sep 13, 2024
4
OBERHELMAN, DIANE
CULLINAN PROPERTIES • FOUNDER
IndividualEDWARDS, IL
$3,300
Dec 3, 2024
5
III, WILLIAM H. GATES
BREAKTHROUGH ENERGY; GATES FOUNDATION • PHILANTHROPIST
IndividualREDMOND, WA
$3,300
Oct 19, 2023
6
OBERHELMAN, DIANE
CULLINAN PROPERTIES • FOUNDER
IndividualEDWARDS, IL
$3,300
Jun 16, 2023
7
BOSQUEZ, RAMON
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualST PETERSBURG, FL
$3,300
Mar 29, 2024
8
EDLOW, MR.JACK
EDLOW INTERNATIONAL COMPANY • CONSULTANT
IndividualTAMPA, FL
$3,300
Mar 28, 2024
9
SNELL, RAND R
SELF-EMPLOYED • COMPOSER
IndividualST PETERSBURG, FL
$3,300
Mar 18, 2024
10
BURGESS, TREVOR R.
TRB DEVELOPMENT • REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
IndividualST PETERSBURG, FL
$3,300
Apr 2, 2024

Rep. Moolenaar, John R. [R-MI-2]

ID: M001194

Top Contributors

10

1
MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND POTTAWATOMI INDIANS
OrganizationSHELBYVILLE, MI
$3,300
Aug 30, 2023
2
PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS
OrganizationTEMECULA, CA
$3,300
Aug 30, 2023
3
POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS
OrganizationDOWAGIAC, MI
$3,300
Aug 30, 2023
4
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE TRIBAL OPERATIONS
OrganizationMOUNT PLEASANT, MI
$3,300
Sep 30, 2023
5
SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS
OrganizationSHINGLE SPRINGS, CA
$3,300
Sep 30, 2023
6
NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI
OrganizationFULTON, MI
$3,300
Mar 12, 2024
7
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$3,300
Jun 20, 2024
8
SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE CHIPPEWA INDIANS
OrganizationSAULT SAINTE MARIE, MI
$2,900
Dec 19, 2023
9
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA
$2,500
Mar 4, 2024
10
SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS
OrganizationSHINGLE SPRINGS, CA
$2,500
Sep 30, 2024

Rep. Krishnamoorthi, Raja [D-IL-8]

ID: K000391

Top Contributors

10

1
HONOR AGING LLC
OrganizationEAST BRUNSWICK, NJ
$3,300
Jul 16, 2024
2
PINNACLE HOSPITAL
OrganizationCROWN POINT, IN
$2,500
Mar 3, 2023
3
HOME BEE LLC
OrganizationWEST BLOOMFIELD, MI
$1,000
Sep 18, 2024
4
SAKA, SAMUEL
SELF EMPLOYED • ENTREPRENEUR
IndividualCHICAGO, IL
$6,600
Jun 2, 2023
5
SAKA, SAMUEL
IndividualCHICAGO, IL
$6,600
Jun 2, 2023
6
GAITONDE, SUJATA
UIC • PROFESSOR
IndividualCHICAGO, IL
$3,700
Feb 6, 2024
7
GAITONDE, SUNIL
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualCHICAGO, IL
$3,700
Feb 6, 2024
8
KALSI, RAHUL S
NICOR GAS • EXECUTIVE
IndividualOAK BROOK, IL
$3,700
Sep 22, 2023
9
KOZAKIEWICZ, BEATA
STERLING GROUP INC. • PRINCIPAL
IndividualCHICAGO, IL
$3,300
Oct 31, 2024
10
JAIN, RAJ
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualORLAND PARK, IL
$3,300
Nov 3, 2024

Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17]

ID: L000599

Top Contributors

10

1
MURTAGH, COSSU, VENDITTI & CASTRO-BLANCO, LLP
OrganizationWHITE PLAINS, NY
$1,000
Feb 24, 2024
2
BATMASIAN, JAMES
INVESTMENTS LIMITED • OWNER
IndividualBOCA RATON, FL
$6,600
Sep 27, 2023
3
BATMASIAN, JAMES
IndividualBOCA RATON, FL
$6,600
Sep 29, 2023
4
AUSTIN, ROBERT
UNAKA CO., INC. • BUSINESSMAN
IndividualDALLAS, TX
$6,600
Jul 18, 2024
5
SILVERMAN, JEFFREY
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualSURFSIDE, FL
$6,534
Feb 15, 2024
6
SILVERMAN, JEFFREY
IndividualSURFSIDE, FL
$6,534
Feb 22, 2024
7
SCALA, MARY ELLEN
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualPORT CHESTER, NY
$5,300
Aug 27, 2023
8
DEUTSCH, SHMULEY
SELF • PRESIDENT
IndividualSPRING VALLEY, NY
$3,900
Jun 24, 2024
9
DEUTSCH, SHMULEY
IndividualSPRING VALLEY, NY
$3,900
Jun 25, 2024
10
PERLMUTTER, RAFUEL
GOLDEN TASTE • CEO
IndividualSPRING VALLEY, NY
$3,400
Jun 24, 2024

Rep. Houlahan, Chrissy [D-PA-6]

ID: H001085

Top Contributors

10

1
HASHEMI, MARY
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualBERWYN, PA
$3,300
Oct 17, 2024
2
KAFKER, ROGER
TA ASSOCIATES • PRIVATE EQUITY
IndividualWELLESLEY, MA
$3,300
Oct 22, 2024
3
MORGAN, HOWARD
MFCIF LLC • VENTURE CAPITAL
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Sep 29, 2023
4
KENNEY, PETER
SELF-EMPLOYED • WRITER
IndividualPHILADELPHIA, PA
$3,300
Sep 26, 2023
5
MANDEL, SUE
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualGREENWICH, CT
$3,300
Jul 23, 2023
6
KJELLERUP, PETER
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualWEST GROVE, PA
$3,300
Sep 23, 2023
7
KEARNS, ANDREW
MORGAN STANLEY • INVESTMENT BANKER
IndividualHILLSBOROUGH, CA
$3,300
Sep 29, 2023
8
METZ, MITCHELL
RTD FINANCIAL ADVISORS • FINANCIAL ADVISOR
IndividualPENN VALLEY, PA
$3,300
Jul 16, 2023
9
KEARNS, ANDREW
MORGAN STANLEY • INVESTMENT BANKER
IndividualHILLSBOROUGH, CA
$3,300
Sep 29, 2023
10
MANDEL, STEVE
LONE PINE CAPITAL • FOUNDER
IndividualGREENWICH, CT
$3,300
Jul 20, 2023

Rep. Gimenez, Carlos A. [R-FL-28]

ID: G000593

Top Contributors

10

1
CARR, JIM
CC HOMES • CEO
IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL
$6,600
Mar 22, 2023
2
GRIFFIN, KENNETH
CITADEL LLC • FOUNDER CEO
IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL
$6,600
Apr 10, 2023
3
KEMMERER, JOHN L
KEMMERER MANAGEMENT CORP • EXECUTIVE
IndividualJACKSON, WY
$6,600
Apr 18, 2023
4
KEMMERER, KAREN
NONE • RETIRED
IndividualJACKSON, WY
$6,600
May 11, 2023
5
STAHL, LEWIS
NEXTGEN MANAGEMENT LLC • FOUNDER
IndividualBOCA RATON, FL
$6,600
Sep 14, 2023
6
POOLE, GREG III
GREGORY POOLE EQUIPMENT COMPANY • OWNER
IndividualRALEIGH, NC
$5,000
Mar 29, 2024
7
CARRICARTE, MICHAEL
NONE • RETIRED
IndividualMIAMI, FL
$5,000
Jun 27, 2023
8
TORRES, HUMBERTO
INSURANCE NATION • INSURANCE AGENT
IndividualMIAMI, FL
$5,000
May 1, 2024
9
TORRES, YADIRA
INSURANCE NATION • INSURANCE AGENT
IndividualMIAMI, FL
$5,000
May 1, 2024
10
BERMAN, MICHAEL
BERMAN AUTO GROUP • AUTO DEALER
IndividualKEY LARGO, FL
$4,000
Mar 28, 2024

Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11]

ID: S001215

Top Contributors

10

1
MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS
OrganizationSHELBYVILLE, MI
$3,300
Oct 31, 2024
2
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Nov 6, 2024
3
MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS
OrganizationSHELBYVILLE, MI
$3,300
Dec 29, 2023
4
NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI
OrganizationFULTON, MI
$3,300
Mar 6, 2024
5
POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS
OrganizationDOWAGIAC, MI
$3,300
Sep 29, 2023
6
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE
OrganizationMT PLEASANT, MI
$3,300
Sep 29, 2023
7
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,650
Jun 5, 2023
8
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,650
Apr 29, 2024
9
SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION
OrganizationEL CAJON, CA
$1,500
Oct 24, 2023
10
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA
$1,000
Dec 29, 2023

Rep. Torres, Ritchie [D-NY-15]

ID: T000486

Top Contributors

10

1
OPEN HAND ASSOCIATION, INC.
OrganizationBRONX, NY
$5,000
Jan 10, 2024
2
JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT
OrganizationPHILADELPHIA, PA
$4,589
May 31, 2023
3
HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA
OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA
$3,300
Jul 18, 2023
4
OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
OrganizationRED ROCK, OK
$3,300
Jul 18, 2023
5
TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA OF NORTH DAKOTA
OrganizationBELCOURT, ND
$3,300
Jul 17, 2023
6
JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT
OrganizationPHILADELPHIA, PA
$2,976
Apr 28, 2023
7
JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT
OrganizationPHILADELPHIA, PA
$682
Jun 6, 2023
8
JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT
OrganizationPHILADELPHIA, PA
$270
Jul 5, 2023
9
JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT
OrganizationPHILADELPHIA, PA
$227
Jul 31, 2023
10
JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT
OrganizationPHILADELPHIA, PA
$48
Jun 30, 2023

Rep. Cline, Ben [R-VA-6]

ID: C001118

Top Contributors

10

1
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$1,000
Oct 31, 2023
2
JOHNSON, CAMERON MR.
MAGIC CITY FORD • CAR DEALER
IndividualROANOKE, VA
$3,300
Nov 21, 2024
3
ROSENBERG, DIANE MS.
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualROANOKE, VA
$3,300
Nov 4, 2024
4
STOLTZFUS, MELISSA
HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER
IndividualBRIDGEWATER, VA
$3,300
Nov 5, 2024
5
STOLTZFUS, MICHAEL
DYNAMIC AVIATION • PRESIDENT & CEO
IndividualBRIDGEWATER, VA
$3,300
Nov 5, 2024
6
STOLTZFUS, MICHAEL
DYNAMIC AVIATION • PRESIDENT & CEO
IndividualBRIDGEWATER, VA
$3,300
Nov 13, 2024
7
CLINE, JULIA S MRS.
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualLEXINGTON, VA
$3,300
Dec 31, 2023
8
CLINE, JULIA S MRS.
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualLEXINGTON, VA
$3,300
Dec 31, 2023
9
CARTLEDGE, GEORGE B MR. III
GRAND HOME FURNISHINGS • PRESIDENT
IndividualROANOKE, VA
$3,300
Mar 30, 2023
10
CARTLEDGE, GEORGE B MR. III
GRAND HOME FURNISHINGS • PRESIDENT
IndividualROANOKE, VA
$3,300
Mar 30, 2023

Rep. McDonald Rivet, Kristen [D-MI-8]

ID: M001237

Top Contributors

10

1
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Nov 5, 2024
2
SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS
OrganizationSAULT SAINTE MARIE, MI
$3,300
Oct 30, 2024
3
MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS
OrganizationSHELBYVILLE, MI
$2,500
Oct 25, 2024
4
MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS
OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS
$1,000
Oct 29, 2024
5
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA
$1,000
Aug 5, 2024
6
SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS
OrganizationSAULT SAINTE MARIE, MI
$500
Aug 6, 2024
7
TAYLOR, DONZEL
IndividualSAGINAW, MI
$4,105
Sep 22, 2024
8
GANDHI, MILAN
SEFL EMPLOYED • ADMINISTRATOR
IndividualSOUTHFIELD, MI
$3,550
Mar 28, 2024
9
WILCOX, ALLISON
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualMIDLAND, MI
$3,350
Jun 14, 2024
10
ALTMAN, LYNDA CARTER
POTOMAC PRODUCTIONS • ACTRESS
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Nov 1, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Wittman, Robert J. [R-VA-1]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 64 nodes and 39 connections (53 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $200,125

Top Donors - Rep. Wittman, Robert J. [R-VA-1]

Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC2 Orgs16 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped.

  • Section 3(b)(3) facilitates private-sector investment in exploration and development of critical minerals and rare earth elements, including leveraging preferential financing from entities like US International Development Finance Corporation and Export-Import Bank, which benefits midstream and infrastructure firms involved in mineral processing and transport.

  • +Renewable Energyconfidence 0.80

    Critical minerals and rare earth elements are essential for renewable energy technologies (e.g., wind turbines, EV batteries, solar panels). By mapping and securing supply chains, the bill supports the renewable energy sector's access to key inputs.

  • Rare earth elements are critical for EV motors and batteries. The bill's focus on mapping and securing supply chains for these materials indirectly benefits EV manufacturers by improving domestic availability and reducing supply chain risks.

  • +Defense Contractorsconfidence 0.70

    Critical minerals are vital for defense systems (e.g., guidance systems, communications). Securing supply chains through international cooperation supports defense contractors reliant on these materials.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Wittman, Robert J. [R-VA-1])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

  • from 24 contributions
    • GIAMBASTIANI, PETE$6,600
    • GIAMBASTIANI, EDMUND PETER III$6,600
    • MACLAUCHLAN, JEFFREY$2,005
    • WALSH, DANIEL PETER$2,005
    • MENGUCCI, JOHN S.$2,000

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Strong
Vector: 64%
Pages: 422-424AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Finding ORE Act directly supports Project 2025's goal of identifying and accessing critical resources to advance U.S. economic interests and promote energy dominance, particularly through mapping rare earth elements and securing supply chains for minerals essential to energy technologies."

Key themes:critical mineralsrare earth elementssupply chain securityU.S. economic interestsenergy dominance

— 389 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions policy and how it affects foreign policy, as well as the international energy landscape and how it affects U.S. national and economic security. l Develop a strategy for identifying and accessing resources and advancing U.S. economic interests. America has recently become a net energy exporter, but it still imports large amounts of essential energy resources such as oil and natural gas as well as such materials as uranium (including yellowcake), lithium, certain rare earth minerals, and energy generation and transmission components and technology. The United States needs a clear understanding of its global energy and economic interests and a strategy for protecting them. l Oppose “climate reparations.” During the November 2022 United Nations climate conference in Egypt, the Biden Administration and other “developed” countries agreed to provide “climate reparations” to developing countries for the harm allegedly caused by the developed countries’ use of fossil fuel.76 A reparations slush fund administered by a non-U.S. organization provides no assurance that U.S. interests will be protected and should not be supported in any form. New Policies l Identify U.S. energy security interests and promote American energy dominance. To this end, IA should work closely with the DESAS Office of Policy on the National Energy Security Strategy. l Strengthen the new DESAS vis-à-vis the Department of State. The State Department’s Bureau of Energy Resources has generally excluded IA from serious discussions of international affairs to the detriment of DOE and broader interagency policy development. In addition, DOE embassy representatives are generally excluded from giving policy advice to senior diplomats and are used merely as sources of information instead of being active advocates for the Secretary’s priorities. The Secretary of Energy is a senior member of the President’s National Security Council and should function as such. The DOE’s Deputy Secretaries, Under Secretaries, and Assistant Secretaries should be guaranteed representation at all Deputies and Policy Coordination Committee meetings. In addition, senior political and career staff should hold positions on the NSC staff equivalent to their counterparts at State, Defense, Treasury, and the Intelligence Community (IC). DESAS billets should replace State Department Bureau of Energy Resources billets at the relevant posts worldwide. — 390 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Stop “climate reparations.” The President should refuse to provide climate reparations under an unratified treaty, and IA should encourage other countries to reconsider their desire to provide reparations. ARCTIC ENERGY OFFICE (AE) Mission/Overview AE was established during the Trump Administration to create a central office overseeing U.S. Arctic interests in Alaska and the other Arctic nations in response to the growing strategic sensitivity of this geographic region and the natural resources it contains. It “serves as the principal advisor to the Under Secretary on all domestic Arctic issues, including energy, science, and national security.”77 Needed Reforms In October 2022, the Biden Administration released its National Strategy for the Arctic Region.78 Although recognizing national security threats in the Arctic, it also focuses heavily on climate change, sustainability, and international cooperation. The United States must establish a strategic plan to promote its national security, energy, and economic interests in the Arctic. An analysis and plan to support the responsible development of Alaska’s energy assets should be a priority. New Policies l Defend American interests in the Arctic Circle. The next Administration needs to define American strategic and economic interests in the Arctic Circle. AE should help to identify those interests, as well as threats posed by countries like Russia and China, and develop appropriate policy options for the President’s consideration. l Ensure that AE is clearly focused. In particular, this means identifying U.S. energy interests in the Arctic Circle, identifying foreign government and commercial interests and activity in the region, and ensuring that the United States does not forgo important energy and national security interests in the Arctic. l Expand AE’s operations in Alaska. AE’s operations in Alaska should be expanded to encompass broader national energy security interests in the region including rare earths, oil, and natural gas. AE should also be the lead for DOE Antarctic operations as a counter to growing Russian and Chinese interest in Antarctic resources.

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Strong
Vector: 63%
Pages: 443-445AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Finding ORE Act aligns with Project 2025's emphasis on domestic energy security and supply chain resilience by promoting international cooperation to map and develop critical minerals and rare earth elements, reducing reliance on non-allied sources. Both prioritize securing energy-critical resources through strategic partnerships and private-sector engagement."

Key themes:energy securitysupply chain resiliencecritical mineralsinternational cooperationprivate-sector investment

— 410 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. Sean Michael Kerner, “Colonial Pipeline Hack Explained: Everything You Need to Know,” TechTarget, April, 26, 2022, https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/Colonial-Pipeline-hack-explained-Everything-you-need-to- know (accessed February 13, 2023). 2. Jacob Knutson, “N.C. Power Company: Substation Repairs Complete After Alleged Attack,” Axios, December 7, 2022, https://www.axios.com/2022/12/07/duke-energy-moore-county-substation-attack (accessed February 13, 2023). 3. H.R. 3684, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law No. 117-58, 117th Congress, November 15, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ58/PLAW-117publ58.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 4. H.R. 5376, Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-169, August 16, 2022, https://www.congress. gov/117/plaws/publ169/PLAW-117publ169.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 5. S. 826, Department of Energy Organization Act, Public Law 95-91, 95th Congress, August 4, 1977, https://www. congress.gov/95/statute/STATUTE-91/STATUTE-91-Pg565.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 6. DOE also promotes domestic energy security by providing research and coordination between government and the private sector on physical and cyber-related threats to energy security. This work should continue and be enhanced under the next Administration. 7. Elimination of OE, NE, FE, and EERE might also be considered; however, there are benefits from having political appointees run separate offices. Specifically, separate program offices can focus on threats that are unique to their energy areas, and having political appointees run separate offices helps to ensure focused, unobstructed pursuit of policy objectives. 8. H.R. 6586, Natural Gas Act, Public Law No. 75-688, 75th Congress, June 21, 1938, https://govtrackus. s3.amazonaws.com/legislink/pdf/stat/52/STATUTE-52-Pg821a.pdf (accessed February 24, 2023). 9. U.S. Department of Energy, “Promoting Energy Justice,” https://www.energy.gov/promoting-energy-justice (accessed February 13, 2023). 10. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Economic Impact and Diversity, “Justice40 Initiative,” https://www. energy.gov/diversity/justice40-initiative (accessed February 13, 2023). 11. Press release, “DOE Releases First-Ever Plan to Advance Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility,” U.S. Department of Energy, September 1, 2022, https://www.energy.gov/articles/doe-releases-first-ever-plan- advance-diversity-equity-inclusion-and-accessibility (accessed February 14, 2023). 12. Including the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, etc. 13. Table, “Environmental Management: Lifecycle Cost by Project Baseline Summary (PBS) ($M),” in U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Volume 6, Environmental Management, April 2022, p. 53, https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/ files/2022-09/doe-fy2023-budget-volume-6-em-v3.pd (accessed February 13, 2023). 14. KPMG, “Independent Auditor’s Report, United States Department of Energy Nuclear Waste Fund Annual Financial Report as of and for the Years Ended September 30, 2022 and 2021,” November 8, 2022, p. 8, in U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Inspector General, Office of Cyber Assessments and Data Analytics, Audit Report: The Department of Energy Nuclear Waste Fund’s Fiscal Year 2022 Financial Statement Audit, DOE- OIG-23-05, November 2022, p. 10, https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-11/DOE-OIG-23-05.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 15. See Patty-Jane Geller, “U.S. Nuclear Weapons,” in 2023 Index of U.S. Military Strength, ed. Dakota L. Wood (Washington: The Heritage Foundation, 2023), pp. 481–506, http://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/2022/ Military_Index/2023_IndexOfUSMilitaryStrength.pdf. 16. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, March 2022, pp. 9, 21, 23, and 43, https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/ files/2022-03/doe-fy2023-budget-in-brief-v2.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 17. H.R. 4346, CHIPS and Science Act, Public Law No. 117-167, 117th Congress, August 9, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ167/PLAW-117publ167.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 18. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response, “About Us,” https://www.energy.gov/ceser/ceser-mission (accessed February 27, 2023).

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Moderate
Vector: 65%
Pages: 401-403AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Finding ORE Act aligns with Project 2025's emphasis on energy security and reducing reliance on non-allied nations for critical resources, particularly through international cooperation and supply chain resilience. However, it focuses on mineral exploration and private-sector investment rather than DOE-specific reforms like eliminating climate-influenced programs or streamlining nuclear regulation, resulting in moderate thematic overlap."

Key themes:energy securityinternational cooperationsupply chain resiliencecritical mineralsprivate sector engagement

— 369 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions private sector for government-favored resources. The DOE Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED); Office of State and Community Energy Programs; ARPA-E; Office of Grid Deployment (OGD); and DOE Loan Program should be eliminated or reformed. If they continue to exist, FECM, NE, OE, and EERE should focus on fundamental science and technology issues, particularly in relation to cyber and physical threats to energy security, rather than subsidizing and commercializing energy resources. l Eliminate political and climate-change interference in DOE approvals of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports. In addition, Congress should reform the Natural Gas Act8 to expand required approvals from merely nations with free trade agreements to all of our allies, such as NATO countries. l Focus the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) on ensuring that government buildings and operations have reliable and cost- effective energy. FEMP should stop using taxpayer dollars to force the purchase of more expensive and less reliable energy resources in the name of combating climate change. l Ensure that information provided by the U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA), a data and statistical organization, is data-neutral. l Focus FERC on its statutory obligation to ensure access to reliable energy at just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory rates. FERC is a five-member commission created under the DOE Organization Act that regulates the wholesale sales and transmission of electricity, promotes electric reliability through standards, permits natural gas pipelines and LNG export facilities, sets natural gas pipeline shipping rates, and sets oil pipeline shipping rates. It is an economic regulator and should not make itself a climate regulator. l Streamline the nuclear regulatory requirements and licensing process. Such changes would help to lower costs and accelerate the development and deployment of civilian nuclear, such as advanced nuclear reactors (including small modular nuclear reactors). The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is commission tasked with the licensing of civilian nuclear reactors and power plants and regulating other uses of nuclear materials, such as nuclear medicine. Although it is not a DOE agency, its jurisdiction over nuclear reactor, fuel, safety, and trade issues often relates to or impinges on DOE’s jurisdiction. — 370 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Focus on energy and science issues, not politicized social programs. The next Administration should stop using energy policy to advance politicized social agendas. Programs that sound innocuous, such as “energy justice,”9 Justice40,10 and DEI,11 can be transformed to promote politicized agendas. DOE should focus on providing all Americans with access to abundant, affordable, reliable, and secure energy, and DOE should manage its employees so that everyone is treated fairly based on his or her talent, skills, and hard work. New Policies: International Energy Security To help the President and policymakers understand and apply U.S. energy inter- ests in international affairs more effectively, various DOE programs offices need to be reformed. l Promote American energy interests. The next Administration should make U.S. energy dominance a key component of its foreign policy while ensuring that domestic and international goals are aligned. American energy dominance will allow the United States to secure energy for its citizens, markets for its energy exports, and access to new energy natural resources and will provide tools for U.S. policymakers to assist our allies and deter our adversaries. DESAS should analyze U.S. international energy security interests and develop a National Energy Security Strategy (NESS). This strategy would take account of the energy landscape across the globe to inform the President in his foreign policy and defense roles, but it should not be a tool for U.S. industrial policy, although it might highlight how current domestic industrial and climate policies threaten U.S. energy and national security. l Strengthen the role of the new Department of Energy Security and Advanced Science. There are frequent turf battles on energy issues between the Department of State and DOE. Although the State Department clearly has the policymaking authority under the DOE Organization Act, it tends to ignore the expertise and perspectives that DOE provides. The existing Assistant Secretary for International Affairs should provide the principal support for the DOE Secretary and Deputy Secretary on National Security Council (NSC) activities and should interface with colleagues at the Departments of Defense, State, Treasury, and Commerce, as well as the Intelligence Community (IC). New Policies: Advanced Science To ensure that America continues to lead the world in fundamental science, the National Labs should be refocused, and national science policy should be reviewed and coordinated.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills