Every Drop Counts Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/338
Last Updated: July 17, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-21]

ID: C001059

Follow the money

The bill

Every Drop Counts Act

HR. 338, 119th Congress — read as touching Construction & Engineering.

The sponsor

Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-21]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$94,000 raised

28 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

55% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Environmental Protection Agency" section, p. 461-463 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Subcommittee Hearings Held

November 18, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the esteemed members of Congress. The "Every Drop Counts Act" - because who doesn't love a good cliché? Let's dissect this farce and expose the real disease beneath.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's stated purpose is to increase surface water and groundwater storage, because apparently, our lawmakers have just discovered that water is essential for human life. Who knew? The actual objective is to funnel more money into the pockets of special interest groups, like agricultural lobbies and construction companies.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) by expanding the eligibility criteria for water storage projects. Now, projects with a capacity of 200-30,000 acre-feet can receive grants. Oh, what a coincidence - this range just so happens to benefit large-scale agricultural operations and construction companies that have donated generously to our lawmakers' campaigns.

The bill also increases the authorization for these grants from $5 billion to $10 billion over five years. Because who needs fiscal responsibility when you're buying votes?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** * Agricultural lobbies: They'll get more water storage projects, which means more subsidies and profits. * Construction companies: More projects mean more contracts and more money. * Environmental groups: They might get some token concessions, but ultimately, they'll be ignored or placated with empty promises. * Taxpayers: You'll foot the bill for these boondoggles.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "watering" down (pun intended) existing environmental regulations to benefit special interests. It will lead to:

* Increased water pollution from agricultural runoff and construction activities * Further depletion of groundwater resources, exacerbating droughts and water scarcity issues * More taxpayer money wasted on inefficient and unnecessary projects

In conclusion, the "Every Drop Counts Act" is a masterclass in legislative doublespeak. It's a bill that claims to address a pressing issue (water conservation) while actually serving the interests of those who have bought our lawmakers' loyalty. Bravo, Congress! You've managed to create another piece of legislation that's as useful as a placebo prescription for a terminal patient.

Diagnosis: Chronic Corruption Syndrome, with symptoms of Ego-Driven Policy Making and Terminal Stupidity. Prognosis: Poor. Treatment: None available; the disease is too far advanced.

Related Topics

Water & Air Quality RegulationsPublic Lands & Natural Resources
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-21]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$94,000
25 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$16,700
Committees
$0
Individuals
$77,300

No PAC contributions found

1
TABLE MOUNTAIN RANCHERIA
1 transaction
$3,300
2
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
3
JJF SP TRUST
1 transaction
$3,300
4
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER RANCH
1 transaction
$3,300
5
SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY
1 transaction
$1,000
6
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$1,000
7
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$1,000
8
CHAPPELL-MCLULLAR TRUST
1 transaction
$500

No committee contributions found

1
KAPLAN, DAVID
2 transactions
$6,600
2
KAPLAN, MEREDITH
2 transactions
$6,600
3
RESNICK, LYNDA RAE
2 transactions
$6,600
4
ARK, MANDEEP
1 transaction
$6,500
5
AFZAL, TEHMINA
1 transaction
$6,500
6
SINGH, JASPREET
1 transaction
$6,500
7
COSTA, NADINE
1 transaction
$5,000
8
GUNNER, RICHARD V.
1 transaction
$3,300
9
SANDBERG, SHERYL
1 transaction
$3,300
10
MCDIARMID, SUZANNE V.
1 transaction
$3,300
11
CAGLIA, RICHARD
1 transaction
$3,300
12
RICHARDS, THOMAS G.
1 transaction
$3,300
13
JONES, TIM
1 transaction
$3,300
14
GUNNER, MIMI
1 transaction
$3,300
15
SIMPSON, STEPHEN J.
1 transaction
$3,300
16
CAMPOS, TONY
1 transaction
$3,300
17
VERMA, ADITYA MD
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 7 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Fulcher, Russ [R-ID-1]

ID: F000469

Top Contributors

10

1
ROBU, ELI
AJ GENERAL CONTRACTORS • CONSTRUCTION
IndividualWORLEY, ID
$3,300
Aug 4, 2024
2
SCOTT, JB
SELF EMPLOYED • REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER
IndividualBOISE, ID
$3,300
Apr 16, 2024
3
VANDERSLOOT, FRANK
MELALEUCA • CEO
IndividualIDAHO FALLS, ID
$3,300
May 1, 2024
4
TURLINGTON, SCOTT
TAMARACK RESORT • HOSPITALITY
IndividualTAMARACK, ID
$3,300
Apr 20, 2024
5
VANDERSLOOT, BELINDA
HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER
IndividualIDAHO FALLS, ID
$3,300
May 1, 2024
6
BENNETT, BRETT
BENNETT LUMBER • PRESIDENT
IndividualMOSCOW, ID
$3,300
Oct 28, 2023
7
WILLIAMS, LARRY
TREE TOP RANCHES • OWNER
IndividualBOISE, ID
$3,300
Feb 13, 2024
8
CENTERS, JAKE
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualMERIDIAN, ID
$3,300
Feb 15, 2024
9
ROOPE, CALEB
THE PACIFIC COMPANIES • CEO
IndividualEAGLE, ID
$3,300
Mar 4, 2024
10
ROOPE, CALEB
THE PACIFIC COMPANIES • CEO
IndividualEAGLE, ID
$3,300
Mar 4, 2024

Rep. Valadao, David G. [R-CA-22]

ID: V000129

Top Contributors

10

1
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$3,300
Oct 23, 2024
2
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Nov 5, 2024
3
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$3,300
Dec 20, 2023
4
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY
OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ
$3,300
Mar 31, 2023
5
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationBANNING, CA
$3,300
Feb 28, 2024
6
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$3,300
Feb 28, 2024
7
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationBANNING, CA
$3,300
May 25, 2023
8
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$3,300
Jun 29, 2024
9
MOORETOWN RANCHERIA
OrganizationOROVILLE, CA
$3,300
Sep 26, 2024
10
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS
OrganizationTEMECULA, CA
$3,300
Aug 16, 2024

Rep. Gray, Adam [D-CA-13]

ID: G000605

Top Contributors

10

1
ACTBLUE
OrganizationSOMMERVILLE, MA
$1,000
Aug 27, 2023
2
ACTBLUE
OrganizationSOMMERVILLE, MA
$1,000
Aug 14, 2023
3
ACTBLUE
OrganizationSOMMERVILLE, MA
$1,000
Aug 14, 2023
4
ESPARZA FOR BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 2026
OrganizationFRESNO, CA
$1,000
Jun 4, 2024
5
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA
$1,000
Aug 1, 2024
6
TONY THURMOND FOR GOVERNOR 2026
OrganizationOAKLAND, CA
$999
Nov 4, 2024
7
TIM GRAYSON FOR SENATE 2024
OrganizationSACRAMENTO, CA
$500
Mar 14, 2024
8
ACTBLUE
OrganizationSOMMERVILLE, MA
$500
Apr 21, 2024
9
ANGEL BARAJAS FOR SUPERVISOR
OrganizationWEST SACRAMENTO, CA
$250
Aug 11, 2024
10
ACTBLUE
OrganizationSOMMERVILLE, MA
$100
May 5, 2024

Rep. Harder, Josh [D-CA-9]

ID: H001090

Top Contributors

10

1
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,650
Jun 26, 2023
2
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,650
Jun 18, 2024
3
CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$1,000
Sep 30, 2023
4
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$1,000
Oct 31, 2024
5
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$1,000
Nov 7, 2024
6
MIRANDA, LAUREL
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualATHERTON, CA
$6,600
Feb 7, 2023
7
ELSON, DAVID
UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES • CEO
IndividualLAS VEGAS, NV
$6,600
Aug 16, 2023
8
GOODMAN, COREY
VENBIO PARTNERS LLC • LIFE SCIENCES VENTURE CAPITAL MANAGING
IndividualMARSHALL, CA
$6,600
Aug 29, 2023
9
SCHMIDT, ERIC
HILLSPIRE LLC • MANAGER
IndividualPALO ALTO, CA
$6,600
Aug 16, 2023
10
BROWN, SHELLEY
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualLOS ALTOS HILLS, CA
$6,600
Aug 19, 2023

Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1]

ID: F000466

Top Contributors

10

1
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$1,500
Dec 31, 2024
2
STATA FAMILY OFFICE
Organization
$500
Apr 26, 2024
3
ASHER, ROBERT B.
IndividualGWYNEDD VALLEY, PA
$10,000
Oct 9, 2024
4
ASHER, ROBERT B.
ASHER CHOCOLATES • CHAIRMAN
IndividualGWYNEDD VALLEY, PA
$10,000
Sep 30, 2024
5
LEVY, EDWARD JR
EDW C LEVY CO • CHAIRMAN
IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI
$6,600
Feb 26, 2024
6
CROTTY, THOMAS
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ
$6,600
Feb 27, 2024
7
EVANS, ROGER
GREYLOCK PARTNERS • PARTNER EMERITUS
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$6,600
Feb 27, 2024
8
LEACH, RONALD
NPX ONE • CHAIRMAN & CEO
IndividualGENEVA, IL
$6,600
Feb 28, 2024
9
MCCLAIN, MARK
SAILPOINT • CEO
IndividualAUSTIN, TX
$6,600
Mar 2, 2024
10
CROTTY, THOMAS
IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ
$6,600
Mar 8, 2024

Rep. Simpson, Michael K. [R-ID-2]

ID: S001148

Top Contributors

10

1
MAPETSI POLICY GROUP LLC
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$1,000
Aug 14, 2023
2
LARA HERWAY
OrganizationBOISE, ID
$713
Nov 29, 2023
3
EASTERN BAND OF, CHEROKEE INDIANS
NATIVE AMERICAN NATION • NATIVE AMERICAN NATION
IndividualCHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Nov 5, 2024
4
EASTERN BAND OF, CHEROKEE INDIANS
NATIVE AMERICAN NATION • NATIVE AMERICAN NATION
IndividualCHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Nov 22, 2024
5
NATION, CHEROKEE
NATIVE AMERICAN NATION • NATIVE AMERICAN NATION
IndividualTAHLEQUAH, OK
$3,300
Nov 5, 2024
6
VECCHIARELLI, DANIEL
LEPRINO FOODS • VICE-CHAIRMAN
IndividualDENVER, CO
$3,300
Oct 30, 2024
7
ARNOLD, JOHN
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualHOUSTON, TX
$3,300
Nov 28, 2023
8
ARNOLD, JOHN
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualHOUSTON, TX
$3,300
Nov 28, 2023
9
BLUE, J. NEAL
GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL • CEO
IndividualLA JOLLA, CA
$3,300
Dec 29, 2023
10
CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE, SAGINAW
NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBE • NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBE
IndividualMT PLEASANT, MI
$3,300
Oct 25, 2023

Rep. Min, Dave [D-CA-47]

ID: M001241

Top Contributors

10

1
SYCUAN BANK OF KUMEYAAY NATION
OrganizationEL CAJON, CA
$3,300
Jun 30, 2023
2
SANTA ROSA RANCHERIA
OrganizationLEMOORE, CA
$3,300
Jun 11, 2024
3
SANTA ROSA RANCHERIA
OrganizationLEMOORE, CA
$3,300
Jun 11, 2024
4
YOCHA DEHE WINTUN NATION
OrganizationBROOKS, CA
$3,300
Sep 25, 2023
5
YOCHA DEHE WINTUN NATION
OrganizationBROOKS, CA
$3,300
Jul 11, 2024
6
BARONA BANK OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA
$2,500
Jun 30, 2023
7
VIEJAS BANK OF KUMEYAAY INDIANS
OrganizationALPINE, CA
$2,500
Jun 30, 2023
8
SYCUAN BANK OF KUMEYAAY NATION
OrganizationEL CAJON, CA
$2,000
Jun 30, 2023
9
SYCUAN BANK OF KUMEYAAY NATION
OrganizationEL CAJON, CA
$1,300
Jun 30, 2023
10
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA
$1,000
Aug 5, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-21]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 64 nodes and 43 connections (55 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $133,100

Top Donors - Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-21]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

8 Orgs17 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.

  • Section 2 amends the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to expand eligibility for water storage projects (including surface water and groundwater storage, conveyance, and aquifer recharge) and increases the authority limit from 5 to 10. This will likely lead to more water infrastructure projects, benefiting construction and engineering firms involved in building dams, reservoirs, pipelines, and recharge facilities.

  • Water storage and conveyance projects may require transportation of materials, equipment, and personnel, potentially increasing demand for trucking and freight rail services, though the connection is indirect.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Environmental Protection Agency

Weak
Vector: 59%
Pages: 461-463AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on expanding water storage infrastructure under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, while the Project 2025 EPA section emphasizes regulatory reforms, statutory deadlines, WOTUS definitions, CWA permitting, primacy, and budget for the Clean Water Act needs survey. Both address water management but diverge in primary objectives and mechanisms."

Key themes:water managementwater conservationinfrastructure

— 429 — Environmental Protection Agency As a matter of broad practice, OW should be complying with statutorily estab- lished deadlines in all situations with only minimal exceptions. In cases where statutory deadlines will not be met, senior management should be made aware of the delay and should have an opportunity to determine whether alternative courses should be taken. Depending on the outcome of regulations from the Biden Administration as well as intervention by the Supreme Court on both waters of the United States (WOTUS) and CWA Section 401,29 the repeal and reissuance of new regulations should be pursued. New Policies New regulations should include the following: l A WOTUS rule that makes clear what is and is not a “navigable water” and respects private property rights. Coordinate with Congress to develop legislation, if necessary, to codify the definition in Rapanos v. United States that “waters of the United States” can refer only to “relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water…as opposed to ordinarily dry channels through which water occasionally or intermittently flows.”30 l A rule that provides clarity and regulatory certainty regarding the CWA Section 401 water quality certification process to limit unnecessary delay for needed projects, including by establishing a discharge-only approach with a limited scope (from point sources into navigable waters), assessing only water quality factors that are consistent with specific CWA sections, and excluding speculative analysis regarding future potential harm. l A rule to ensure that CWA Section 30831 has a clear and enforced time limit. l A rule to clarify the standard for criminal negligence under CWA Sections 40232 and 404.33 l A rule to prohibit retroactive or preemptive permits under CWA Section 404. l A rule to promote and shape nutrient trading that utilizes a carrot-versus- stick approach when dealing with nutrient compliance. l A rule to update compensatory mitigation that imposes no new or additional requirements beyond current law. l A rule on updates necessary for the effective use of the CWA needs survey. — 430 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l An executive order requiring EPA to find avenues and expedite the process for states obtaining primacy in available CWA and SDWA programs. This order would require coordination with the Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of the Interior. l Implementation of additional policies to address challenges in water workforce, issues surrounding timely actions on primacy applications, and cybersecurity. Budget While the overall goal is certainly to reduce government spending, there is one very targeted area where increased spending would be in the nation’s interest. The Clean Water Act needs survey is the entire basis for how congressionally appro- priated funds directed to state revolving funds—standard annual appropriations that are the true underpinning of all infrastructure funding for drinking water and clean water—are distributed by EPA across the country. Because this program is currently underfunded, money is being thrown at untargeted locations while water infrastructure is crumbling at other locations. Increased targeted funding would greatly benefit water systems across the country at a time when intervention is crucial, leaving fewer communities with significant water service challenges. Personnel OW would benefit greatly from the reshifting of SES employees to different programs and from headquarters out to regional offices. OFFICE OF LAND AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (OLEM) OLEM’s mission is to partner with other federal agencies, states, tribes, local governments, and communities to clean up legacy pollution and revitalize land for reuse. OLEM executes this mission by protecting human health and the envi- ronment while leveraging economic opportunities and creating jobs. OLEM also oversees the agency’s emergency response. The main statutes that OLEM exe- cutes are the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)34 to regulate waste management; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)35 to clean up Superfund sites and provide resources for cleaning up brownfields sites; and Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act36 to reduce the likelihood of accidental chemical releases. Needed Reforms OLEM’s main function is to oversee the execution of cleanups under CERCLA and RCRA; therefore, it is critical that OLEM staff focus on project management more than policy creation. Emphasizing productivity more than process and policies

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Weak
Vector: 58%
Pages: 425-427AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Every Drop Counts Act focuses on expanding water storage infrastructure and conservation measures, which is unrelated to the Department of Energy's R&D, national lab oversight, technology transfer, or nuclear cleanup priorities outlined in Project 2025. Any alignment is only tangential through general themes of resource management and environmental considerations."

Key themes:water conservationresource managementenvironmental considerationsinfrastructure investment

— 393 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions l Ensure that R&D funds are used for projects that protect and advance that edge. l Ensure that successful advances, with a focus on new natural resource development technologies, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and space, are transferred swiftly to American interests in the private sector. New Policies l Focus on benefits to Americans. OTT’s operations should be based on the recognition that the new technologies generated by American taxpayers’ investment in DOE are a significant national security asset rather than some neutral scientific gift to humanity. l Increase oversight and coordination. OTT needs to be vigilant in overseeing and coordinating OTT offices associated with each National Lab. For security and economic espionage reasons, the work funded by the American people needs to be protected, and when commercialized, it needs to go to American businesses. OFFICE OF SCIENCE (SC) Mission/Overview The Office of Science (SC) supports and oversees research facilities and pro- grams that cover basic science through its application to the demonstration and deployment of energy technologies. SC oversees 10 of the 17 DOE National Labs and 28 major federal research user facilities. Its mission is to preserve U.S. leader- ship in science, fund and perform basic research, and provide the scientific facilities that the private sector is unable or unwilling to provide. New initiatives include quantum information sciences and artificial intelligence. SC is led by a Senate-con- firmed Director at the Assistant Secretary level and has eight program offices.82 Needed Reforms The next conservative President should commit the United States to scientific dominance to support national and economic security, especially in light of similar efforts by China. To aid in this effort, the Office of Science should: l Return to its primary mission: nonpartisan and basic science. SC’s mission should be international leadership in basic and early applied science and provision of world-leading facilities for this work. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Inflation Reduction Act mark the major — 394 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise reorientation of DOE primarily from defense applications in the NNSA and basic and early applied science across SC and the applied offices to a massive federal research, development, demonstration, and commercialization body.83 Distraction from SC’s basic science mission should be prevented. l Increase the level of accountability. The National Laboratories need to be more directly accountable to the Secretary of Energy and Congress for their work and management. New Policies l Commit to U.S. science dominance. The United States is losing its dominance in scientific discoveries and technological development. China and other adversaries have been stealing American science and technology for years and are now on the verge of dominating science—a development that is fraught with negative strategic and economic implications for the United States. The next Administration must commit itself to ensuring that the U.S. continues to dominate scientific discovery and technological advancement. l Refocus on mission and eliminate duplication and waste. The Administration should work with Congress to rationalize the National Lab network to meet specific national objectives (such as the NNSA laboratories’ role in national defense) and conduct basic research that the private sector would not otherwise conduct. Activities that duplicate those of other government agencies or the private sector should be eliminated. l Properly manage the National Labs’ contributions to the private sector. SC should improve private-sector access to the National Labs, through programs like the GAIN voucher program and consistent with national security considerations, while ensuring that the economic benefits of taxpayer-funded technologies flow back to taxpayers through patent- review sharing or a revolving fund. Budget The Office of Science was appropriated slightly more than $7 billion in FY 2021, and DOE requested slightly less than $7.8 billion for FY 2023.84 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (EM) Mission/Overview The Office of Environmental Management’s mission is to “complete the safe cleanup of [the] environmental legacy resulting from decades of nuclear

Environmental Protection Agency

Weak
Vector: 58%
Pages: 458-460AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill addresses water storage and conservation infrastructure, whereas the Project 2025 EPA section focuses on air quality regulations, greenhouse gas reporting, permitting reforms, and mobile source standards, resulting in only tangential thematic overlap."

Key themes:water conservationenvironmental protectionresource efficiencyinfrastructure funding

— 425 — Environmental Protection Agency are statutorily required, and remove any regulatory differences between attainment and maintenance that are not explicitly required by law. l Streamline the process for state and local governments to demonstrate that their federally funded highway projects will not interfere with NAAQS attainment. l Adopt policies to prevent abuse of EPA’s CAA “error correction” authority.20 EPA historically has used this to coerce states into adopting its favored policies on pain of imposition of a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP). l Limit EPA’s reliance on CAA § 30121 general rulemaking authority to ensure that it is not abused to issue regulations for which EPA lacks substantive authority elsewhere in the statute. l If possible, return the standard-setting role to Congress. Climate Change l Remove the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) for any source category that is not currently being regulated. The overall reporting program imposes significant burdens on small businesses and companies that are not being regulated. This is either a pointless burden or a sword-of- Damocles threat of future regulation, neither of which is appropriate. l Establish a system, with an appropriate deadline, to update the 2009 endangerment finding. l Establish a significant emissions rate (SER) for greenhouse gasses (GHGs). Regulating Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act22 l Repeal Biden Administration implementing regulations for the AIM Act that are unnecessarily stringent and costly. l Refrain from granting petitions from opportunistic manufacturers to add new restrictions that further skew the market toward costlier refrigerants and equipment. — 426 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Conduct realistic cost assessments that reflect actual consumer experiences instead of the current unrealistic ones claiming that the program is virtually cost-free. Mobile Source Regulation by the Office of Transportation and Air Quality l Establish GHG car standards under Department of Transportation (DOT) leadership that properly consider cost, choice, safety, and national security. l Review the existing “ramp rate” for car standards to ensure that it is actually achievable. l Include life cycle emissions of electric vehicles and consider all of their environmental impacts. l Restore the position that California’s waiver applies only to California- specific issues like ground-level ozone, not global climate issues. l Ensure that other states can adopt California’s standards only for traditional/criteria pollutants, not greenhouse gases. l Stop the use of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to increase standards on airplanes. l Reconsider the Cleaner Trucks Initiative to balance the goal of driving down emissions without creating significant costs or complex burdens on the industry. Air Permitting Reforms for New Source Review (Pre-Construction Per- mits) and Title V (Operating Permits) l Develop reforms to ensure that when a facility improves efficiency within its production process, new permitting requirements are not triggered. l Restore the Trump EPA position on Once-In, Always-In (that major sources can convert to area sources when affiliated emissions standards are met). l Revisit permitting and enforcement assumptions that sources will operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year; this artificially inflates a source’s potential to emit (PTE), which can result in more stringent permit terms.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills