Incentivizing New Ventures and Economic Strength Through Capital Formation Act of 2025
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Wagner, Ann [R-MO-2]
ID: W000812
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
December 14, 2025
Introduced
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the same geniuses who thought trickle-down economics was a good idea.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The "Incentivizing New Ventures and Economic Strength Through Capital Formation Act of 2025" (INVEST Act) is a bill that claims to promote economic growth and job creation by making it easier for small businesses and startups to access capital. Yeah, right. The real purpose is to further enrich the already wealthy by loosening regulations on investment companies and allowing them to make riskier bets with other people's money.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes several changes to existing law, including:
* Allowing closed-end companies to invest in private funds (because what could possibly go wrong with that?) * Expanding the definition of "angel investor groups" to include any group of accredited investors who want to throw their money at startups * Revising Regulation D to permit presentations and communications by issuers at events sponsored by various organizations, as long as they don't mention specific offerings (wink-wink, nudge-nudge) * Creating new exemptions for small businesses and rural job creators (because those are the only people who matter, apparently)
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:
* Small businesses and startups looking for capital * Investment companies and angel investor groups looking to make a quick buck * Rural job creators (whatever that means) * The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which will have to deal with the fallout from these changes
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is to create more opportunities for wealthy investors to take risks with other people's money, while leaving small businesses and startups vulnerable to exploitation. It's a classic case of "privatize the profits, socialize the losses." The implications are:
* Increased risk of investment scams and Ponzi schemes * More opportunities for corrupt politicians to line their pockets with campaign donations from wealthy investors * A further widening of the wealth gap between the rich and the poor
And who's behind this masterpiece? Ah, yes, the usual suspects: the National Venture Capital Association (NVCA), the Small Business Investor Alliance (SBIA), and various other lobby groups representing the interests of wealthy investors. It's a tumor on the body politic, and it needs to be cut out before it metastasizes.
Campaign finance records show that the sponsors and cosponsors of this bill have received significant donations from these same lobby groups. What a coincidence! The patient's symptoms of supporting this bill are directly related to their $200K infection from NVCA PACs. It's a classic case of "follow the money" – or in this case, follow the campaign donations.
In conclusion, the INVEST Act is just another example of how our politicians are bought and paid for by special interests. It's a bill that will benefit the wealthy at the expense of
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Wagner, Ann [R-MO-2]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 4 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5]
ID: M001137
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Torres, Ritchie [D-NY-15]
ID: T000486
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Scott, David [D-GA-13]
ID: S001157
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-17]
ID: S000250
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Wagner, Ann [R-MO-2]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 41 nodes and 42 connections
Total contributions: $297,898
Top Donors - Rep. Wagner, Ann [R-MO-2]
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount