Tehran Incitement to Violence Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/6230

Last Updated: July 16, 2026

Tehran Incitement to Violence Act

HR. 6230, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Rep. Self, Keith [R-TX-3]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$105,700 raised

21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

95% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of State" section, p. 211-213 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

June 8, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

As I analyze the Tehran Incitement to Violence Act, I see an opportunity for strategic maneuvering that could potentially yield a billion-dollar windfall for my conglomerate. The bill's primary objective is to designate certain Iranian individuals and entities as specially designated global terrorists, thereby imposing sanctions on them.

The key provisions of this bill include the designation of specific individuals, such as Abdolmajid Kharghani and Alireza Panahian, as specially designated global terrorists due to their involvement in inciting violence against U.S. and Israeli leaders. The bill also requires the President to submit a determination within 180 days on whether these foreign persons meet the criteria for sanctions based on their role in issuing and amplifying fatwas advocating for violence.

The affected parties and stakeholders include Iranian clerics, politicians, and entities linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), as well as U.S. and Israeli leaders who are potential targets of violence. My conglomerate, with its significant interests in the energy and defense sectors, could potentially benefit from the sanctions imposed on these Iranian entities.

The potential impact and implications of this bill are multifaceted. On one hand, it may lead to increased tensions between the U.S. and Iran, potentially disrupting global energy markets and benefiting my conglomerate's investments in alternative energy sources. On the other hand, the bill's focus on designating specific individuals and entities as terrorists may create opportunities for my think tank, the "Liberty Institute," to shape the narrative around the issue and influence policy decisions that could further consolidate my wealth and power.

In conclusion, the Tehran Incitement to Violence Act presents a complex web of opportunities and challenges. As a self-serving billionaire, I will continue to monitor the situation closely, leveraging my resources and influence to shape the outcome in ways that maximize my profits and solidify my position as a dominant player in the global economy. With projected returns on investment exceeding $10 billion over the next decade, this bill has the potential to be a game-changer for my conglomerate.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

Let's break down the Tehran Incitement to Violence Act, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics, a bill is introduced to address a specific issue or problem. In this case, the main purpose of HR 6230 is to designate certain individuals as specially designated global terrorists and impose sanctions on them for inciting violence against U.S. President Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and other political leaders.

The key provisions of this bill are outlined in Section 3, which requires the President to submit a determination within 180 days on whether certain foreign persons meet the criteria for sanctions based on their role in issuing and amplifying fatwas advocating for violence. Remember when we learned about the importance of committees in the legislative process? This bill has been referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations, where it will be reviewed and potentially amended before being voted on by the full Senate.

As we covered in 8th grade, bills often affect various parties and stakeholders. In this case, the affected parties include President Trump, Prime Minister Netanyahu, and other political leaders who have been targeted by fatwas issued by Iranian clerics. The bill also impacts the Islamic Republic of Iran, as it seeks to hold them accountable for inciting violence against U.S. and Israeli leaders.

The potential impact of this bill is significant, with implications for national security, international relations, and human rights. If passed, the bill could lead to increased tensions between the U.S. and Iran, as well as potential economic sanctions on Iranian individuals and entities. As I taught you, the system of checks and balances is designed to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. In this case, Congress is exercising its authority to impose sanctions and hold foreign entities accountable for their actions.

In conclusion, HR 6230 is a complex bill that addresses a critical issue in international relations. By understanding the main purpose, key provisions, affected parties, and potential impact of this bill, we can better appreciate the intricacies of the legislative process and the importance of civic engagement. As I always say, "a well-informed citizenry is essential to a functioning democracy." Now, if only more people had paid attention in 8th grade civics...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round! Today, we're diving into the Tehran Incitement to Violence Act, a bill that's got more twists and turns than a snake oil salesman's pitch. As I decode this congressional concoction, keep in mind that nothing is as it seems, and the truth is hidden in plain sight.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose of HR 6230 is to designate certain individuals as specially designated global terrorists, specifically those who've issued fatwas calling for violence against President Trump, Prime Minister Netanyahu, and other world leaders. But, my friends, don't be fooled – this bill is just a smokescreen for something much bigger. It's about expanding the government's surveillance powers, increasing sanctions on Iran, and furthering the agenda of the military-industrial complex.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 3 of the bill allows the President to impose sanctions on foreign persons who've issued or amplified fatwas advocating for violence. But what's really going on here? This provision gives the government carte blanche to target anyone they deem a threat, without due process or oversight. It's a slippery slope, folks! The bill also mentions "certain organizations" that will be subject to sanctions, but which ones exactly? The language is deliberately vague, leaving room for interpretation and potential abuse.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The obvious targets are Iranian clerics and officials who've issued fatwas against Western leaders. But let's not forget the real stakeholders: the military-industrial complex, the surveillance state, and the politicians who benefit from fear-mongering and war profiteering. This bill is a boon for them, as it justifies increased spending on "national security" and further entrenches the US in the Middle East.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The implications are far-reaching and ominous. This bill could lead to increased tensions with Iran, further destabilization of the region, and a heightened risk of war. It also sets a dangerous precedent for targeting individuals and organizations based on their speech or ideology, rather than actual actions. The sanctions regime will likely harm innocent civilians, exacerbate humanitarian crises, and create more refugees. And let's not forget the potential for blowback – when you poke a hornet's nest, you can expect to get stung.

In conclusion, my friends, HR 6230 is a Trojan horse, disguised as a measure to protect world leaders but actually designed to expand government power, justify war, and line the pockets of special interests. Stay vigilant, question everything, and remember: the truth is always hiding in plain sight, waiting to be uncovered by those with eyes to see.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(outraged tone) Folks, we've got a real doozy on our hands here! The Tehran Incitement to Violence Act, HR 6230, is a bill that's all about protecting our great nation and its leaders from the evil clutches of... (dramatic pause) ...Iranian clerics! That's right, these so-called "men of God" are calling for the assassination of our beloved President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Can you believe it? The audacity!

Now, let's get down to business. The main purpose of this bill is to designate certain individuals as specially designated global terrorists, because, you know, they're inciting violence against our leaders. (smirk) I mean, who needs freedom of speech when you're calling for the death of our great leaders, right? The objectives are clear: to impose sanctions on these foreign persons and organizations that are issuing and amplifying fatwas advocating for violence.

The key provisions of this bill include a determination by the President to sanction these foreign persons within 180 days. (wink) Because, you know, we need to act fast to protect our freedom-loving leaders from those evil Iranians. The changes to existing law are significant, folks. We're talking about expanding the definition of terrorism to include incitement to violence against our leaders. (smirk) I mean, it's about time we took a stand against these terrorist sympathizers.

The affected parties and stakeholders include President Trump, Prime Minister Netanyahu, and other political leaders who are being targeted by these fatwas. (concerned tone) Can you imagine if one of them actually got hurt? The horror! The outrage! (smirk) But don't worry, folks, this bill has got their backs.

Now, let's talk about the potential impact and implications. (dramatic music plays in the background) This bill could lead to a significant escalation of tensions between the US and Iran. (gasp) But hey, who needs diplomacy when you've got sanctions, right? The elites will tell you that this bill is just a bunch of saber-rattling, but I say, "No way, Jose!" We need to stand up for our freedom and protect our leaders from these terrorist threats.

In conclusion, folks, the Tehran Incitement to Violence Act is a necessary step in protecting our great nation and its leaders from the evil forces of terrorism. (patriotic music plays) We must stand strong against these Iranian clerics and their fatwas of death. (smirk) And if you don't like it, well, that's just too bad. We're going to keep on fighting for our freedom, no matter what the elites say. God bless America! (wink)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the geniuses in Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Tehran Incitement to Violence Act (HR 6230) claims to target Iranian individuals and organizations that have issued fatwas advocating for violence against President Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and other political leaders. How noble. In reality, this bill is a thinly veiled attempt to grandstand on national security, pander to special interest groups, and distract from the real issues plaguing our country.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill proposes to designate certain Iranian individuals as "specially designated global terrorists" (because that's not already a redundant term) and impose sanctions on them. Oh, and it also requires the President to submit a report to Congress within 180 days determining whether these foreign persons meet the criteria for sanctions. Wow, I bet the Iranians are shaking in their boots.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: Iranian hardliners, clerics, and politicians who will use this as propaganda to further their own agendas; the Israeli government, which will likely applaud this move as a token of American support; and, of course, the American people, who will be treated to another round of fear-mongering and national security theater.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will achieve precisely nothing in terms of reducing violence or improving national security. It's a symbolic gesture, a Potemkin village of policy-making designed to impress the ignorant and the gullible. The real impact will be to further polarize the region, embolden Iranian hardliners, and provide a pretext for more military adventurism. And, as always, the American people will foot the bill – literally and figuratively.

In conclusion, HR 6230 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice: a cynical, self-serving exercise in political posturing that will only serve to exacerbate the problems it claims to address. The diagnosis? A bad case of " Politicus Grandiosus" – a disease characterized by an inflated sense of self-importance, a lack of intellectual honesty, and a penchant for solving complex problems with simplistic, symbolic gestures. The prognosis? More of the same: empty rhetoric, failed policies, and a continued decline into chaos and absurdity.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Summary of the Tehran Incitement to Violence Act (HR 6230)**

### 1. Main Purpose & Objectives

The main purpose of the Tehran Incitement to Violence Act is to designate certain individuals as specially designated global terrorists due to their involvement in inciting violence against U.S. and Israeli leaders, particularly President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The bill aims to address the threat posed by Iranian clerics and officials who have issued fatwas (Islamic legal decrees) calling for the death of these leaders, thereby endangering their lives and imperiling national security.

### 2. Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law

The key provisions of the bill include:

- **Designation of Specially Designated Global Terrorists**: The bill requires the President to determine whether certain foreign persons, including Iranian clerics and officials, meet the criteria for sanctions due to their role in issuing and amplifying fatwas advocating for violence against U.S. and Israeli leaders. - **Findings**: The bill outlines findings that highlight the incitement of violence by Iranian clerics and officials, including the issuance of fatwas against President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu, and the crowdfunding campaign to assassinate them. - **Sanctions**: The bill implies the imposition of sanctions on individuals determined to meet the criteria, although the specifics of these sanctions are not detailed in the provided text.

### 3. Affected Parties & Stakeholders

The affected parties and stakeholders include:

- **President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu**: As the primary targets of the fatwas and incitement to violence. - **Iranian Clerics and Officials**: Specifically, those who have issued or supported fatwas calling for violence against U.S. and Israeli leaders, such as Abdolmajid Kharghani, Ayatollah Hossein Mazaheri, Alireza Panahian, and others mentioned in the bill. - **The United States and Israel**: In terms of national security and the protection of their leaders. - **International Community**: The bill's implications for global terrorism and the use of fatwas to incite violence could have broader international repercussions.

### 4. Potential Impact & Implications

The potential impact and implications of the Tehran Incitement to Violence Act include:

- **Enhanced Sanctions on Iran**: The designation of Iranian individuals as specially designated global terrorists could lead to increased economic and diplomatic pressure on Iran. - **Protection of U.S. and Israeli Leaders**: By addressing the incitement of violence, the bill aims to enhance the security and protection of President Trump, Prime Minister Netanyahu, and potentially other leaders. - **Global Counter-Terrorism Efforts**: The bill could contribute to international efforts to combat terrorism by highlighting and confronting the use of religious decrees to incite violence. - **Diplomatic Tensions**: The act could exacerbate diplomatic tensions between the U.S., Israel, and Iran, potentially affecting regional stability and global

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down the Tehran Incitement to Violence Act, bro. This bill is all about callin' out Iran for inciting violence against some major world leaders, like President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main goal of this bill is to designate certain Iranian individuals as specially designated global terrorists, which would impose some serious sanctions on them, man. It's all about holdin' Iran accountable for their actions and protectin' our national security, bro.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 3 of the bill requires the President to determine whether certain foreign persons meet the criteria for sanctions within 180 days, dude. This means the President has to take a hard look at these individuals and decide if they're worthy of sanctions. The bill also highlights some pretty intense fatwas issued by Iranian clerics, which is like, super concerning, bro.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects some major players, including President Trump, Prime Minister Netanyahu, and other world leaders who've been targeted by these fatwas, man. It also impacts the Iranian government and those individuals who've been issuin' these violent calls to action, bro. The US and Israeli governments are also stakeholders, as they're tryin' to protect their leaders and citizens from harm.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** If this bill becomes law, it could lead to some serious consequences for Iran, dude. We're talkin' sanctions, travel restrictions, and other penalties that could hurt their economy and reputation, bro. It's also a big deal for global security, as it shows the US is takin' a strong stance against terrorism and incitement to violence, man. On the other hand, it could escalate tensions between the US and Iran, which is like, super concerning, bro.

In conclusion, this bill is all about standin' up to Iran's violent rhetoric and protectin' our national security, dude. It's a complex issue, but by breakin' it down, we can see that it's all about holdin' people accountable for their actions and keepin' the world a safer place, bro.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Comprehensive Summary of the Tehran Incitement to Violence Act (HR 6230)**

### 1. Main Purpose & Objectives

The primary objective of HR 6230, the Tehran Incitement to Violence Act, is to designate certain individuals as specially designated global terrorists due to their involvement in inciting violence against U.S. and Israeli leaders, notably President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The bill aims to counteract the perceived threats posed by Iranian clerics and officials who have issued fatwas (Islamic legal decrees) calling for the assassination of these leaders.

### 2. Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law

- **Section 1** provides a short title for the Act. - **Section 2** outlines findings that justify the legislation, including specific instances where Iranian clerics have called for violence against U.S. and Israeli leaders. - **Section 3** requires the President to determine whether certain foreign persons meet the criteria for sanctions due to their role in issuing or amplifying fatwas advocating for violence against specified political leaders.

### 3. Affected Parties & Stakeholders

The affected parties include: - **Iranian Clerics and Officials**: Specifically, those who have issued fatwas calling for violence against U.S. and Israeli leaders. - **U.S. and Israeli Leaders**: The bill directly references President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as targets of these fatwas. - **International Community**: The imposition of sanctions could affect international relations, particularly between the U.S., Israel, and Iran.

### 4. Potential Impact & Implications

The potential impact includes: - **Escalation of Tensions**: Sanctions against Iranian individuals and entities could escalate tensions between the U.S., Israel, and Iran. - **Human Rights Concerns**: The bill's focus on countering incitement to violence may also raise human rights concerns, particularly regarding freedom of speech and the implications for those sanctioned. - **Geopolitical Implications**: The legislation could influence geopolitical dynamics in the Middle East, potentially affecting alliances, conflicts, and diplomatic efforts.

In terms of monied interests, this bill is likely supported by PACs and lobby groups with strong ties to Israel or those advocating for a tough stance against Iran. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) might be a key supporter due to the bill's focus on protecting Israeli leaders from Iranian threats. Additionally, defense and security industries could indirectly benefit from increased tensions or military actions resulting from the sanctions imposed by this act. However, direct financial analysis of PAC donations specifically targeting this bill is not provided here as it would require up-to-date campaign finance data that may not be readily available.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Self, Keith [R-TX-3]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$105,700

20 donors

PACs

Organizations

$300

Committees

Individuals

$105,400

No PAC contributions found

TUCKER HILL HOA

1 transaction

$300

No committee contributions found

CHALIN, THOMAS

2 transactions

$11,600

MULLIGI, GINO

1 transaction

$9,000

FRITCHER, SAMMY

1 transaction

$6,600

LOBB, PAT

1 transaction

$6,600

MYERS, ROBERT

1 transaction

$6,600

HUFFINES, RAY

1 transaction

$6,600

MOSES, FRED

1 transaction

$6,600

LI, QINGSONG

1 transaction

$6,000

UIHLEIN, RICHARD

1 transaction

$5,800

HILTON, W.D.

1 transaction

$5,000

KORCA, YLBER

1 transaction

$5,000

SMAJLI, MARIO

1 transaction

$5,000

KRASNIQI, BLERINA

1 transaction

$4,500

QUILLIN, GEORGE

1 transaction

$4,000

ADAMS, CAROL A

1 transaction

$3,300

DEASON, DARWIN

1 transaction

$3,300

MCCLELLAND, MARK

1 transaction

$3,300

KELLOGG, DAVID H

1 transaction

$3,300

HILTON, MARY JEAN

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Vindman, Eugene Simon [D-VA-7]

ID: V000138

Top Contributors

LUX FOR VIRGINIA

OrganizationLADYSMITH, VA

$500

Mar 29, 2024

LUX FOR VIRGINIA

OrganizationLADYSMITH, VA

$500

Mar 31, 2024

FORSTER-BURKE, DIANE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualCOTTONWOOD HEIGHTS, UT

$4,000

Apr 20, 2024

FORSTER-BURKE, DIANE

IndividualCOTTONWOOD HEIGHTS, UT

$4,000

May 5, 2024

VON STEIN, THOMSON

IndividualROCKVILLE, MD

$3,500

Aug 7, 2024

HULL, MEGAN

SELF • ACTIVIST

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,300

Nov 2, 2024

KAISER, GEORGE

GBK CORPORATION • EXECUTIVE

IndividualTULSA, OK

$3,300

Oct 25, 2024

PARSONS, KATHLEEN

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualPOTOMAC, MD

$3,300

Oct 18, 2024

STAPLE, HARISE

SELF • MD

IndividualLOS ALTOS, CA

$3,300

Oct 18, 2024

HOLMES, LAURA

SELF • REAL ESTATE INVESTOR

IndividualBOCA RATON, FL

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17]

ID: L000599

Top Contributors

MURTAGH, COSSU, VENDITTI & CASTRO-BLANCO, LLP

OrganizationWHITE PLAINS, NY

$1,000

Feb 24, 2024

BATMASIAN, JAMES

INVESTMENTS LIMITED • OWNER

IndividualBOCA RATON, FL

$6,600

Sep 27, 2023

BATMASIAN, JAMES

IndividualBOCA RATON, FL

$6,600

Sep 29, 2023

AUSTIN, ROBERT

UNAKA CO., INC. • BUSINESSMAN

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$6,600

Jul 18, 2024

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSURFSIDE, FL

$6,534

Feb 15, 2024

SILVERMAN, JEFFREY

IndividualSURFSIDE, FL

$6,534

Feb 22, 2024

SCALA, MARY ELLEN

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPORT CHESTER, NY

$5,300

Aug 27, 2023

DEUTSCH, SHMULEY

SELF • PRESIDENT

IndividualSPRING VALLEY, NY

$3,900

Jun 24, 2024

DEUTSCH, SHMULEY

IndividualSPRING VALLEY, NY

$3,900

Jun 25, 2024

PERLMUTTER, RAFUEL

GOLDEN TASTE • CEO

IndividualSPRING VALLEY, NY

$3,400

Jun 24, 2024

Rep. Fulcher, Russ [R-ID-1]

ID: F000469

Top Contributors

ROBU, ELI

AJ GENERAL CONTRACTORS • CONSTRUCTION

IndividualWORLEY, ID

$3,300

Aug 4, 2024

SCOTT, JB

SELF EMPLOYED • REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER

IndividualBOISE, ID

$3,300

Apr 16, 2024

VANDERSLOOT, FRANK

MELALEUCA • CEO

IndividualIDAHO FALLS, ID

$3,300

May 1, 2024

TURLINGTON, SCOTT

TAMARACK RESORT • HOSPITALITY

IndividualTAMARACK, ID

$3,300

Apr 20, 2024

VANDERSLOOT, BELINDA

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualIDAHO FALLS, ID

$3,300

May 1, 2024

BENNETT, BRETT

BENNETT LUMBER • PRESIDENT

IndividualMOSCOW, ID

$3,300

Oct 28, 2023

WILLIAMS, LARRY

TREE TOP RANCHES • OWNER

IndividualBOISE, ID

$3,300

Feb 13, 2024

CENTERS, JAKE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualMERIDIAN, ID

$3,300

Feb 15, 2024

ROOPE, CALEB

THE PACIFIC COMPANIES • CEO

IndividualEAGLE, ID

$3,300

Mar 4, 2024

ROOPE, CALEB

THE PACIFIC COMPANIES • CEO

IndividualEAGLE, ID

$3,300

Mar 4, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Self, Keith [R-TX-3]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 44 nodes and 30 connections (31 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $134,800

Top Donors - Rep. Self, Keith [R-TX-3]

Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount

1 Org19 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of State

Very Strong

Vector: 57%

Pages: 211-213AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill directly targets Iranian officials for incitement to violence, imposing sanctions that align with Project 2025's call for a harder, cost-imposing stance against the Iranian theocracy and its threats to U.S. and allied leaders."

Key themes:Iran threatsanctions/cost-imposingcountering terrorism/incitementprotecting U.S. and allied leaderspressing on the Iranian theocracy

— 179 — Department of State priority. That said, the next President must significantly reorient the U.S. govern- ment’s posture toward friends and adversaries alike—which will include much more honest assessments about who are friends and who are not. This reorien- tation could represent the most significant shift in core foreign policy principles and corresponding action since the end of the Cold War. Although not every country or issue area can be discussed in this chapter, below are examples of several areas in which a shift in U. S. foreign policy is not only import- ant, but arguably existential. The point is not to assert that everyone in the evolving conservative movement, or, in some cases, the growing bipartisan consensus, will agree with the details of this assessment. Rather, what is presented below demon- strates the urgency of these issues and provides a general roadmap for analysis. In a world on fire, a handful of nations require heightened attention. Some rep- resent existential threats to the safety and security of the American people; others threaten to hurt the U.S. economy; and others are wild cards, whose full threat scope is unknown but nevertheless unsettling. The five countries on which the next Administration should focus its attention and energy are China, Iran, Venezuela, Russia, and North Korea. The People’s Republic of China The designs of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Chinese Com- munist Party, which runs the PRC, are serious and dangerous.9 This tyrannical country with a population of more than 1 billion people has the vision, resources, and patience to achieve its objectives. Protecting the United States from the PRC’s designs requires an unambiguous offensive-defensive mix, including protecting American citizens and their interests, as well as U.S. allies, from PRC attacks and abuse that undermine U.S. competitiveness, security, and prosperity. The United States must have a cost-imposing strategic response to make Bei- jing’s aggression unaffordable, even as the American economy and U.S. power grow. This stance will require real, sustained, near-unprecedented U.S. growth; stronger partnerships; synchronized economic and security policies; and American energy independence—but above all, it will require a very honest perspective about the nature and designs of the PRC as more of a threat than a competitor.10 The next President should use the State Department and its array of resources to reassess and lead this effort, just as it did during the Cold War. The U.S. government needs an Article X for China,11 and it should be a presidential mandate. Along with the National Security Council, the State Department should draft an Article X, which should be a deeply philosophical look at the China challenge. Many foreign policy professionals and national leaders, both in government and the private sector, are reluctant to take decisive action regarding China. Many are vested in an unshakable faith in the international system and global norms. They are so enamored with them they cannot brook any criticisms or reforms, let alone — 180 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise acknowledge their potential for being abused by the PRC. Others refuse to acknowl- edge Beijing’s malign activities and often pass off criticism as conspiracy theories. For instance, many were quick to dismiss even the possibility that COVID-19 escaped from a Chinese research laboratory. The reality, however, is that the PRC’s actions often do sound like conspiracy theories—because they are conspiracies. In addition, some knowingly or not parrot the Communist line: Global leaders includ- ing President Joe Biden, have tried to normalize or even laud Chinese behavior. In some cases, these voices, like the global corporate giants BlackRock and Disney, directly benefit from doing business with Beijing. On the other hand, others acknowledge the dangers posed by the PRC, but believe in a moderating approach to accommodate its rise, a policy of “compete where we must, but cooperate where we can,” including on issues like climate change. This strategy has demonstrably failed. As with all global struggles with Communist and other tyrannical regimes, the issue should never be with the Chinese people but with the Communist dictator- ship that oppresses them and threatens the well-being of nations across the globe.12 That said, the nature of Chinese power today is the product of history, ideology, and the institutions that have governed China during the course of five millennia, inherited by the present Chinese leaders from the preceding generations of the CCP.13 In short, the PRC challenge is rooted in China’s strategic culture and not just the Marxism–Leninism of the CCP, meaning that internal culture and civil society will never deliver a more normative nation. The PRC’s aggressive behavior can only be curbed through external pressure. The Islamic Republic of Iran The ongoing protests in the Islamic Republic of Iran (Iran), which are widely viewed as a new revolution, have shown that the Islamic regime, which has been in power since 1979 when Ayatollah Khomeini became the leader, is at its weakest state in its history and is at odds not only with its own people but also its regional neighbors. Iran is home to a proud and ancient culture, yet its people have strug- gled to achieve democracy and have had to endure a hostile theocratic regime that vehemently opposes freedom. The time may be right to press harder on the Iranian theocracy, support the Iranian people, and take other steps to draw Iran into the community of free and modern nations. Unfortunately, the Obama and Biden Administrations have propped up the brutal Islamist theocracy that has hurt the Iranian people and threatened nuclear war. For example, the Obama Administration’s 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, commonly referred to as the Iran nuclear deal, gave the Islamic regime a crucial monetary lifeline after the Green Movement protests in 2009, which, while ultimately unsuccessful, did succeed in weakening the regime and showing the world that younger Iranians want freedom.

Department of State

Strong

Vector: 56%

Pages: 217-219AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill aligns strongly with Project 2025's objective of countering Iranian influence and supporting Israel by targeting Iranian clerics who incite violence against U.S. and Israeli leaders, thereby advancing regional security and counterterrorism goals."

Key themes:Iran sanctionsIsrael securitycounterterrorismregional stabilityanti-Iranian regime

— 185 — Department of State l First, the U.S. must prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear technology and delivery capabilities and more broadly block Iranian ambitions. This means, inter alia, reinstituting and expanding Trump Administration sanctions; providing security assistance for regional partners; supporting, through public diplomacy and otherwise, freedom-seeking Iranian people in their revolt against the mullahs; and ensuring Israel has both the military means and the political support and flexibility to take what it deems to be appropriate measures to defend itself against the Iranian regime and its regional proxies Hamas, Hezbollah, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. l Second, the next Administration should build on the Trump Administration’s diplomatic successes by encouraging other Arab states, including Saudi Arabia, to enter the Abraham Accords. Related policies should include reversing, as appropriate, the Biden Administration’s degradation of the long-standing partnership with Saudi Arabia. The Palestinian Authority should be defunded. A further key priority is keeping Türkiye in the Western fold and a NATO ally. This includes a vigorous outreach to Türkiye to dissuade it from “hedging” toward Russia or China, which is likely to require a rethinking of U.S. support for YPG/PKK [People’s Protection Units/Kurdistan Worker’s Party] Kurdish forces, which Ankara believes are an existential threat to its security. For the foreseeable future— and much longer than one new Administration—Middle Eastern oil will play a key role in the world economy. Therefore, the U.S. must continue to support its allies and compete with its economic adversaries, including China. Relations with Saudi Arabia should be strengthened in a way that seriously curtails Chinese influence in Riyadh. l Third, it is in the U.S. national interest to build a Middle East security pact that includes Israel, Egypt, the Gulf states, and potentially India, as a second “Quad” arrangement. Protecting freedom of navigation in the Gulf and in the Red Sea/Suez Canal is vital to the world economy and therefore to U.S. prosperity as well. In North Africa, security cooperation with European allies, especially France, will be vital to limit growing Islamist threats and the incursion of Russian influence through positionings of the Wagner Group. l The U.S. cannot neglect a concern for human rights and minority rights, which must be balanced with strategic and security considerations. Special attention must be paid to challenges of religious freedom, especially the status of Middle Eastern Christians and other religious minorities, as well as the human trafficking endemic to the region. — 186 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Sub-Saharan Africa Africa’s importance to U.S. foreign policy and strategic interests is rising and will only continue to grow. Its explosive population growth, large reserves of industry-dependent minerals, proximity to key maritime shipping routes, and its collective diplomatic power ensure the continent’s global importance. Yet as Afri- ca’s strategic significance has grown, the U.S.’s relative influence there has declined. Terrorist activity on the continent has increased, while America’s competitors are making significant gains for their own national interests. The PRC’s companies dominate the African supply chain for certain minerals critical to emerging tech- nologies. African nations comprise major country-bloc elements that shield the PRC and Russia from international isolation for their human rights abuses—and African nations staunchly support PRC foreign policy goals on issues such as Hong Kong occupation, South China Seas dispute arbitration, and Taiwan. The new Administration can correct this strategic failing of existing policy by prioritizing Africa and by undertaking fundamental changes in how the United States works with African nations. At a bare minimum, the next Administration should: l Shift strategic focus from assistance to growth. Reorient the focus of U.S. overseas development assistance away from stand-alone humanitarian development aid and toward fostering free market systems in African countries by incentivizing and facilitating U.S. private sector engagement in these countries. Development aid alone does little to develop countries and can fuel corruption and violent conflict. While the United States should always be willing to offer emergency and humanitarian relief, both U.S. and African long-term interests are better served by a free market-based, private growth-focused strategy to Africa’s economic challenges. l Counter malign Chinese activity on the continent. This should include the development of powerful public diplomacy efforts to counter Chinese influence campaigns with commitments to freedom of speech and the free flow of information; the creation of a template “digital hygiene” program that African countries can access to sanitize and protect their sensitive communications networks from espionage by the PRC and other hostile actors; the recognition of Somaliland statehood as a hedge against the U.S.’s deteriorating position in Djibouti; and a focus on supporting American companies involved in industries important to U.S. national interests or that have a competitive advantage in Africa. l Counter the furtherance of terrorism. African country-based terrorist groups like Boko Haram may currently lack the capability to attack the

Department of State

Strong

Vector: 55%

Pages: 214-216AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill's focus on sanctioning Iranian officials who incite violence aligns with Project 2025's call to pressure the Iranian theocracy using economic and diplomatic tools to advance U.S. national security and support a free Iran."

Key themes:Iran sanctionspressure on Iranian regimecounterterrorismnational securitytargeting incitement

— 181 — Department of State Instead of pressuring the Iranian theocracy to move toward democracy, the Obama Administration threw the brutal regime an economic lifeline by giving hundreds of billions of dollars to the Iranian government and providing other sanc- tions relief. This economic relief did not moderate the regime, but emboldened its brutality, its efforts to expand its nuclear weapons programs, and its support for global terrorism. Former President Obama has admitted his lack of support for the Green Movement during his Administration was an error and blamed it on poor advisors—yet those same advisors are involved with the Biden Administration’s insistence on reducing pressure on the theocracy and resurrecting a nuclear deal. The next Administration should neither preserve nor repeat the mistakes of the Obama and Biden Administrations. The correct future policy for Iran is one that acknowledges that it is in U.S. national security interests, the Iranian people’s human rights interests, and a broader global interest in peace and stability for the Iranian people to have the democratic government they demand. This decision to be free of the country’s abusive leaders must of course be made by the Iranian people, but the United States can utilize its own and others’ economic and diplo- matic tools to ease the path toward a free Iran and a renewed relationship with the Iranian people. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela Once a model of democracy and a true U.S. ally, the Bolivarian Republic of Ven- ezuela (Venezuela) has all but collapsed under the Communist regimes of the late Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro. In the 24 years since Hugo Chavez was first elected Venezuelan president in 1999, the country has violently cracked down on pro-democracy citizens and organizations, shattered its once oil-rich economy, empowered domestic criminal cartels, and helped fuel a hemispheric refugee crisis. Venezuela has swung from being one of the most prosperous, if not the most prosperous, country in South America to being one of the poorest. Its Communist leadership has also drawn closer to some of the United States’ greatest interna- tional foes, including the PRC and Iran, which have long sought a foothold in the Americas. Indeed, Venezuela serves as a reminder of just how fragile democratic institutions that are not maintained can be. To contain Venezuela’s Communism and aid international partners, the next Administration must take important steps to put Venezuela’s Communist abusers on notice while making strides to help the Venezuelan people. The next Administration must work to unite the hemisphere against this significant but underestimated threat in the Southern Hemisphere. Russia One issue today that starkly divides conservatives is the Russia–Ukraine con- flict. The common ground seems to be recognition that presidential leadership in 2025 must chart the course. — 182 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l One school of conservative thought holds that as Moscow’s illegal war of aggression against Ukraine drags on, Russia presents major challenges to U.S. interests, as well as to peace, stability, and the post-Cold War security order in Europe. This viewpoint argues for continued U.S. involvement including military aid, economic aid, and the presence of NATO and U.S. troops if necessary. The end goal of the conflict must be the defeat of Russian President Vladimir Putin and a return to pre-invasion border lines. l Another school of conservative thought denies that U.S. Ukrainian support is in the national security interest of America at all. Ukraine is not a member of the NATO alliance and is one of the most corrupt nations in the region. European nations directly affected by the conflict should aid in the defense of Ukraine, but the U.S. should not continue its involvement. This viewpoint desires a swift end to the conflict through a negotiated settlement between Ukraine and Russia. l The tension between these competing positions has given rise to a third approach. This conservative viewpoint eschews both isolationism and interventionism. Rather, each foreign policy decision must first ask the question: What is in the interest of the American people? U.S. military engagement must clearly fall within U.S. interests; be fiscally responsible; and protect American freedom, liberty, and sovereignty, all while recognizing Communist China as the greatest threat to U.S. interests. Thus, with respect to Ukraine, continued U.S. involvement must be fully paid for; limited to military aid (while European allies address Ukraine’s economic needs); and have a clearly defined national security strategy that does not risk American lives. Regardless of viewpoints, all sides agree that Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is unjust and that the Ukrainian people have a right to defend their homeland. Furthermore, the conflict has severely weakened Putin’s military strength and provided a boost to NATO unity and its importance to European nations. The next conservative President has a generational opportunity to bring res- olution to the foreign policy tensions within the movement and chart a new path forward that recognizes Communist China as the defining threat to U.S. interests in the 21st century. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Peace and stability in Northeast Asia are vital interests of the United States. The Republic of Korea (South Korea) and Japan are critical allies for ensuring a free and open Indo–Pacific. They are indispensable military, economic, diplomatic, and technology partners. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK, or North

Intelligence Community

Weak

Vector: 56%

Pages: 248-250AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on sanctioning Iranian individuals for incitement of violence, which is a counterterrorism/foreign policy measure, while the Project 2025 Intelligence Community section emphasizes IC neutrality, FISA reform, and China-focused intelligence sharing. There is only tangential overlap in the broader national security and counterterrorism domain."

Key themes:counterterrorismnational securityforeign threats

— 215 — Intelligence Community Hill who attempt to weaponize the use of selective intelligence to feed political narratives. l Political leaders should avoid “manipulation-by-appointment,” a practice by which intelligence leaders are selected for their policy views or political loyalties instead of their skilled expertise.24 Presidents should also avoid public rebukes and pressure from the intelligence profession, which can include intimidation and bullying, to shape IC analysis. This will be easier if IC leaders live by the norms of neutrality and thus are not seen as political actors, for whom political responses are deemed necessary. l Intelligence leaders and professionals should never “cook the books” for Presidents or change or shape their analysis to preserve access or status.25 FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT (FISA) A future President should understand the importance of FISA26 while also seek- ing reforms and accountability for any abuses of its authorities. When discussing FISA and what changes may need to be made, it is important to note and recognize that there are stark differences among the individual FISA authorities. Section 702 of FISA, for example, allows the IC to target foreign terrorists, spies, cyber hackers, and other bad actors (but only if they are non-U.S. persons) when their communications pass through the United States. While this authority may lapse if Congress does not resolve the issue by the end of 2023, Section 702 should be understood as an essential tool in the fight against terrorism, malicious cyber actors, and Chinese espionage. These are two major national security priorities for an incoming President, and it is imperative that the need to use properly main- tained and accountable authorities to counter these challenges be recognized. Section 702 is a vital program that often provides the lion’s share of intelligence used in the President’s Daily Brief (PDB).27 An independent review by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB) found that it was not abused. Nev- ertheless, Congress should review the PCLOB’s upcoming 2023 report to help it determine whether any reforms or codification of recent administrative changes in FISA processes are needed. Other authorities in Title I and Title III, often referred to as “traditional” FISA, have elicited valid concerns about the politicization of intelligence collection authority in recent years. When seeking surveillance of Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, for example, the FBI and the Department of Justice concealed vital information from a specialized court and submitted applications that were riddled with errors. An incoming conservative President should consider reforms designed to prevent future partisan abuses of national security authority. A package of strong provisions to protect against such partisanship might include: — 216 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Stiffer penalties and mandatory investigations when intelligence leaks are aimed at domestic political targets, l Tighter controls on otherwise lawful intercepts that also collect the communications of domestic political figures, l An express prohibition on politically motivated use of intelligence authorities, and l Reforms to improve the accountability of the Justice Department and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. To keep intelligence credentials from being used for partisan purposes, former high-ranking intelligence officials who retain a clearance should remain subject to the Hatch Act after they leave government to deter them from tying their political stands or activism to their continuing privilege of access to classified government information. The IC should be prohibited from monitoring so-called domestic disinformation. Such activity can easily slip into suppression of an opposition party’s speech, is corrosive of First Amendment protections, and raises questions about impartiality when the IC chooses not to act. CHINA-FOCUSED CHANGES, REFORMS, AND RESOURCES The term “whole of government” is all too frequently overused, but in responding to the generational threat posed by the Chinese Communist Party, that is exactly the approach that our national security apparatus should adopt. CIA Director William Burns has formally established a China Mission Center focused on these efforts, but it can be successful only if it is given the necessary personnel, cross-community collaboration, and resources. That is uncertain at this point, and just how seriously the organization is taking the staffing of the center is unclear. A critical strategic question for an incoming Administration and IC lead- ers will be: How, when, and with whom do we share our classified intelligence? Understanding when to pass things to liaisons and for what purpose will be vital to outmaneuvering China in the intelligence sphere. Questions for a President will include: l What is our overarching conception of the adversarial relationship and competition? l How does intelligence-sharing fit into that conception?

Department of Justice

Weak

Vector: 55%

Pages: 608-610AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on designating foreign individuals as terrorists for inciting violence against U.S. and Israeli leaders, while the Project 2025 DOJ section emphasizes domestic terrorism concerns, FBI oversight, and internal DOJ matters, resulting in only limited thematic overlap."

Key themes:terrorismnational securityprotection of officialslaw enforcementsanctions

— 575 — Department of Justice 22. Editorial Board, “About Those Domestic-Terrorist Parents,” The Wall Street Journal, October 26, 2021, https://www. wsj.com/articles/about-those-domestic-terrorists-national-school-boards-association-merrick-garland-memo- fbi-11635285900 (accessed February 3, 2023); John Malcom, “Are Parents Being Tagged as ‘Domestic Terrorists’ by the FBI? Justice Department Needs to Show Its Cards,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 18, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/are-parents-being-tagged-domestic-terrorists-the- fbi-justice (accessed February 3, 2023); Victor Nava, “FBI Treated Twitter as a ‘Subsidiary,’ Flagged Tweets and Accounts for ‘Misinformation,’” New York Post, updated December 16, 2022, https://nypost.com/2022/12/16/fbi- treated-twitter-as-subsidiary-flagged-tweets-for-misinformation/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 23. Mary Margaret Olohan, “DOJ’s Kristen Clarke: A Pro-Abortion Activist Enforcing the Law Against Pro-Lifers,” The Daily Signal, October 26, 2022, https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/10/26/dojs-kristen-clarke-pro- abortion-activist-enforcing-law-pro-lifers/ ; Josh Gerstein, “DOJ Official Pressed on Targeting of Supreme Court Justices,” Politico, July 28, 2022, https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/28/doj-official-pressed-on- targeting-of-supreme-court-justices-00048506 (accessed February 3, 2023). 24. Solomon, “FBI Email Chain May Provide Most Damning Evidence of FISA Abuses Yet”; Post Editorial Board, “The FBI Knew RussiaGate Was a Lie—But Hid That Truth”; O’Neill, “FBI Pressured Twitter, Sent Trove of Docs Hours Before Post Broke Hunter Laptop Story.” 25. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, “History: The Nation Calls, 1908–1923,” https:// www.fbi.gov/history/brief-history/the-nation-calls (accessed February 3, 2023). 26. Press release, “FBI and Law Enforcement Partners Arrest Nearly 6,000 Violent Criminals This Summer,” U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, September 13, 2022, https://www.fbi.gov/news/ press-releases/press-releases/fbi-and-law-enforcement-partners-arrest-nearly-6000-violent-criminals-this- summer (accessed February 3, 2023). 27. See, for example, Joseph Goldstein, “As Seen in ‘Goodfellas’: Arrest Is Made in ’78 Lufthansa Robbery,” The New York Times, January 23, 2014, https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/24/nyregion/arrests-in-cold-case- investigation-including-78-lufthansa-heist.html (accessed February 3, 2023). 28. Danielle Wallace, “FBI Nationwide Operation Locates 121 Actively Missing Kids, Child Sex Trafficking Victims,” Fox News, August 15, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/us/fbi-nationwide-operation-locates-actively-missing- kids-child-sex-trafficking-victims (accessed February 3, 2023). 29. Adam Shaw, “FBI Stepped in After Suspected Chinese Spy Got Close to Swalwell, Other Politicians, Report Finds,” Fox News, December 8, 2020, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-chinese-spy-swalwell-other- politicians (accessed February 3, 2023). 30. The precise scope and contours of this review warrant special consideration. A review of all ongoing drug trafficking investigations or specific violent crime investigations may not warrant the department’s attention in the same way as high-profile, politically sensitive investigations likely will. Nevertheless, the goal should be as comprehensive a review as possible. 31. 28 U.S. Code § 531, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/531 (accessed February 3, 2023). Emphasis added. 32. The same could be said to apply to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and potentially to the U.S. Marshals Service, although the USMS’s mission protecting the federal courts could present compelling reasons why the department should maintain it as a direct report to the Deputy Attorney General. 33. See, for example, Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers No. 1, October 27, 1787, https://founders.archives. gov/documents/Hamilton/01-04-02-0152 (accessed February 3, 2023). 34. An argument could also be made that the upper echelons of the FBI’s leadership should physically relocate back to the Robert F. Kennedy building to ensure proper accountability and to emphasize organizational reality: The FBI is a component of the department, not its equal, as outlined above. 35. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Audit of the Roles and Responsibilities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Office of the General Counsel in National Security Matters, Report No. 22-116, September 2022, https://oig.justice.gov/sites/default/files/reports/22-116.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 36. S. 2212, Crime Control Act of 1976, Public Law No. 94-503, October 15, 1976, § 203, 90 Stat. 2427 (codified as amended at 28 U.S. Code § 532), https://www.congress.gov/94/statute/STATUTE-90/STATUTE-90-Pg2407. pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 37. See “Enhancing Federal Focus and Resources in Jurisdictions with Rule-of-Law Deficiencies,” infra. — 576 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 38. Garland Memorandum, October 4, 2021; press release, “America First Legal Seeks Two Federal Investigations on Attorney General Merrick Garland’s Infamous Oct. 4th Memo Siccing the FBI on Concerned Parents,” America First Legal Foundation, March 14, 2022, https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-seeks-two-federal- investigations-on-attorney-general-merrick-garlands-infamous-oct-4th-memo-siccing-the-fbi-on-concerned- parents/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 39. Luke Rosiak, “In Aftermath of Enemies List, School Committee Pledges to ‘Silence the Opposition,’” Daily Wire, March 27, 2021, https://www.dailywire.com/news/after-enemies-list-school-body-pledges-to-silence-the- opposition (accessed February 3, 2023). 40. The language of the Equal Protection Clause “reflects that ‘achieving equal protection against lawbreakers was at the core of the Clause’s objectives.’” Lefebure v. D’Aquilla, 15 F.4th 650, 669 (5th Cir. 2021) (Graves, J. dissenting) (quoting Lawrence Rosenthal, “Policing and Equal Protection,” Yale Law & Policy Review, Vol. 21, No. 53 (2003), p. 70) cert. denied, 212 L. Ed. 2d 791, 142 S. Ct. 2732 (2022)), https://casetext.com/case/ lefebure-v-daquilla-2 (accessed February 3, 2023). 41. See, for example, Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler’s actions in 2020 calling on federal officials—executing their mission to protect federal property and officials—to leave the city, saying, “They’re not wanted here” despite the fact that local reports found that “[o]ut of more than a thousand arrests reported by the Portland Police Bureau and other local law enforcement since late May 2020, only about 8.4% of the cases are still open” and that the “rest have been dismissed or listed as no complaint, which means authorities are not currently pursuing charges.” BBC News, “Portland Protests: Mayor Demands Federal Officers Leave City,” July 20, 2020, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53466718 (accessed February 3, 2023), and Hannah Lambert, “91% of Portland Protest Arrests Not Being Prosecuted,” Portland Tribune, January 5, 2021, https://archive.ph/ OSDbz (accessed February 3,2023). 42. Figure 4, “Trend in Average Guideline Minimum and Average Sentence Imposed for Armed Career Criminals Fiscal Years 2010–2019,” in U.S. Sentencing Commission, Federal Armed Career Criminals: Prevalence, Patterns, and Pathways, March 2021, p. 26, https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/ research-publications/2021/20210303_ACCA-Report.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). 43. 18 U.S. Code § 924(e), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/924 (accessed February 3, 2023). 44. S. 1586, Restoring the Armed Career Criminal Act, 117th Congress, introduced May 12, 2021, https://www. congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/1586 (accessed February 6, 2023). 45. This could require seeking the Supreme Court to overrule Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407 (2008), in applicable cases, but the department should place a priority on doing so. 46. 21 U.S. Code § 801 et seq., https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/chapter-13/subchapter-I/part-A (accessed February 3, 2023). 47. 18 U.S. Code §§ 1961–1968, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-96 (accessed February 3, 2023). 48. For more on this topic generally, see “Ensuring Enforcement and Administration of Our Immigration Laws,” infra. 49. See Paul J. Larkin, “Twenty-First Century Illicit Drugs and Their Discontents: The Scourge of Illicit Fentanyl,” Heritage Foundation Legal Memorandum No. 313, November 1, 2022), https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/ files/2022-11/LM313.pdf. 50. Jessica Rendall, “100,000 People Died from Drug Overdoses in the US in One Year, a Record,” CNET, November 18, 2021, https://www.cnet.com/health/medical/100000-people-died-from-drug-overdoses-in- the-us-in-one-year-a-record/ (accessed February 3, 2023). 51. U.S. Department of Justice, National Security Division, “Information About the Department of Justice’s China Initiative and a Compilation of China-Related Prosecutions Since 2018,” last updated November 19, 2021, https://www.justice.gov/archives/nsd/information-about-department-justice-s-china-initiative-and- compilation-china-related (accessed February 3, 2023). 52. Ronn Blitzer and Jake Gibson, “Biden DOJ Ending National Security Initiative Aimed at Countering China amid Complaints About Bias,” Fox News, February 23, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-ending-china- initiative-national-security-program-bias (accessed February 3, 2023). 53. National Security Strategy, The White House, October 2022, p. 23, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/ uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf (accessed February 3, 2023). See also ibid., p. 8.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Self, Keith

State Department Recurring Reports Repeal and Sunset Act of 2026

119/hr/8668

SHADOW Act

119/hr/7632

Preshevo Valley Discrimination Assessment Act

119/hr/6411

Back to All Bills