Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/6506
Last Updated: July 16, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Moran, Nathaniel [R-TX-1]

ID: M001224

Follow the money

The bill

Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act

HR. 6506, 119th Congress — read as touching Commercial Banks.

The sponsor

Rep. Moran, Nathaniel [R-TX-1]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$85,900 raised

20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

66% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 733-735 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

May 19, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the geniuses in Congress. The "Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act" - because, you know, taxpayers weren't already coddled enough by the IRS's gentle touch.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is a symptom of a deeper disease: the perpetual need for politicians to appear as if they're doing something, anything, to help the common folk. In reality, it's just a minor tweak to the tax code, designed to make it slightly more difficult for the IRS to collect taxes from wealthy individuals and corporations who can afford to hire armies of lawyers and accountants.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill suspends the statute of limitations on filing a claim for credit or refund during collection action proceedings, because why not give taxpayers even more time to dispute their tax bills? It also prohibits the crediting of overpayments against disputed tax liability during these proceedings, because heaven forbid the IRS might actually try to collect what's owed. And, of course, it expands the jurisdiction of the Tax Court, because who doesn't love a good game of judicial ping-pong?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: wealthy taxpayers, corporations, and their lobbyists, who will no doubt be thrilled by these changes. Oh, and let's not forget the IRS, which will have to deal with even more bureaucratic red tape and litigation. As for the average taxpayer? Ha! They're just pawns in this game of legislative chess.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "much ado about nothing." It won't significantly impact the overall tax burden on most Americans, but it will give politicians a nice soundbite to trot out during election season. The real winners will be the lawyers and accountants who will get to bill their clients for even more hours of work navigating these changes. And, of course, the politicians themselves, who will get to claim they're "helping" taxpayers while actually just helping their wealthy donors.

In short, this bill is a minor adjustment to the tax code, designed to make it slightly more complicated and slightly more favorable to those who can afford to game the system. But hey, at least it's a nice distraction from the real issues facing this country. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this legislative farce unfold.

Related Topics

Taxation & IRS RegulationsFederal Budget & Appropriations
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Moran, Nathaniel [R-TX-1]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$85,900
15 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$0
Committees
$0
Individuals
$85,900

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

1
PELTIER, PATRICK
5 transactions
$26,400
2
MARSHALL, MATTHEW
2 transactions
$13,200
3
ANDERSON, RICHARD M.
1 transaction
$5,000
4
LEATHERWOOD, HARRY
1 transaction
$5,000
5
STOVALL, SCOTT
1 transaction
$3,300
6
PELTIER, MIKAH ANN
1 transaction
$3,300
7
STEVENSON, DAVID L
1 transaction
$3,300
8
ALEXANDER, JERRY
1 transaction
$3,300
9
MARTIN, REID
1 transaction
$3,300
10
SHULL, A.E.
1 transaction
$3,300
11
SHULL, COLLIN
1 transaction
$3,300
12
WALSH, JENNIFER SHULL
1 transaction
$3,300
13
HUBBARD, SONJA
1 transaction
$3,300
14
AHMED, TANWEER
1 transaction
$3,300
15
PAYNE, STEPHEN
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Sewell, Terri A. [D-AL-7]

ID: S001185

Top Contributors

10

1
BUFFALO ROCK COMPANY
OrganizationBIRMINGHAM, AL
$5,000
Oct 15, 2024
2
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
OrganizationATMORE, AL
$3,300
Mar 26, 2024
3
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
OrganizationATMORE, AL
$3,300
Sep 21, 2023
4
BUFFALO ROCK COMPANY
OrganizationBIRMINGHAM, AL
$2,500
Sep 10, 2024
5
BUFFALO ROCK COMPANY
OrganizationBIRMINGHAM, AL
$2,500
Sep 30, 2024
6
LAW OFFICES OF FREDERICK GRAEFE LLC
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$500
Sep 30, 2023
7
CHIROPRACTIC CARE INC.
OrganizationGULF SHORES, AL
$250
Feb 26, 2024
8
BROWN, CANDACE P.
NONERETIRED
IndividualFLORENCE, SC
$4,500
Sep 6, 2024
9
BROWN, JAMES A.
SMS COMPANYVICE PRESIDENT
IndividualFLORENCE, SC
$4,500
Sep 6, 2024
10
LEHMAN, WILLIAM
NOT EMPLOYEDNOT EMPLOYED
IndividualAVENTURA, FL
$3,300
Dec 9, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Moran, Nathaniel [R-TX-1]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 28 nodes and 23 connections (41 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $97,500

Top Donors - Rep. Moran, Nathaniel [R-TX-1]

Showing top 15 donors by contribution amount

15 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 harmed.

  • Commercial Banksconfidence 0.80

    Section 3(a) adds a new subsection to Section 6402 of the Internal Revenue Code, which prohibits crediting overpayments against disputed tax liability during collection action proceedings, potentially increasing regulatory burden on commercial banks involved in tax-related transactions.

  • The expansion of Tax Court jurisdiction in Section 4 may lead to increased scrutiny and potential liabilities for private equity and hedge funds with complex tax structures or disputes.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Moran, Nathaniel [R-TX-1])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HARMS

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.

Introduction

Moderate66.1%
Pages: 733-735

— 700 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Deputy Commissioner should be replaced. A thorough review of IT contracts should be conducted. The Integrated Modernization Business Plan41 should be systematically reviewed and a version of it cost-effectively implemented. An over- sight board composed of private sector IT experts should be established and given the authority to conduct meaningful, contemporaneous oversight. TAXPAYER RIGHTS AND PRIVACY Legal protections for taxpayer rights and privacy have improved during the past three decades, but they remain inadequate.42 Congress should do more. For exam- ple, interest on overpayments should be the same as interest on underpayments rather than the government receiving a higher rate, the time limit for taxpayers to sue for damages for improper collection actions should be extended, the juris- diction of the Tax Court should be expanded, and the tax penalty system should be reformed by rationalizing the penalty structure and reducing some of the most punitive penalties.43 The Office of the Taxpayer Advocate was created by Congress to assist taxpay- ers when the IRS bureaucracy is unresponsive or negligent. About 1.7 percent of the IRS budget goes to this function.44 Each year, the Office handles more than 250,000 cases, helping taxpayers to deal with the IRS. Each year, it issues nearly 2000 taxpayer assistance orders, a form of administrative injunction, forcing the rest of the IRS to stop taking unwarranted actions.45 Congress should provide the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate with greater resources so that it may better assist taxpayers suffering from wrongful IRS actions. The office should also be strengthened by, among other things: l Ensuring that the National Taxpayer Advocate can make his or her own personnel decisions to protect its independence; l Ensuring NTA access to files, meetings, and other information needed to assist taxpayers or investigate IRS administrative practices; l Requiring the IRS to address the NTA’s comments in final rules and including the NTA in deliberations prior to the release of a proposed rule; and l Authorizing the NTA to file amicus briefs independently. Administrative Burden. In 2021, Americans filed 261 million tax returns and an astounding 4.7 billion information returns (such as Form W-2s, Form 1098s and Form 1099s).46 Complying with tax law costs Americans more than $400 bil- lion annually, or about 2 percent of gross domestic product.47 Although the IRS

Introduction

Moderate66.1%
Pages: 733-735

— 700 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Deputy Commissioner should be replaced. A thorough review of IT contracts should be conducted. The Integrated Modernization Business Plan41 should be systematically reviewed and a version of it cost-effectively implemented. An over- sight board composed of private sector IT experts should be established and given the authority to conduct meaningful, contemporaneous oversight. TAXPAYER RIGHTS AND PRIVACY Legal protections for taxpayer rights and privacy have improved during the past three decades, but they remain inadequate.42 Congress should do more. For exam- ple, interest on overpayments should be the same as interest on underpayments rather than the government receiving a higher rate, the time limit for taxpayers to sue for damages for improper collection actions should be extended, the juris- diction of the Tax Court should be expanded, and the tax penalty system should be reformed by rationalizing the penalty structure and reducing some of the most punitive penalties.43 The Office of the Taxpayer Advocate was created by Congress to assist taxpay- ers when the IRS bureaucracy is unresponsive or negligent. About 1.7 percent of the IRS budget goes to this function.44 Each year, the Office handles more than 250,000 cases, helping taxpayers to deal with the IRS. Each year, it issues nearly 2000 taxpayer assistance orders, a form of administrative injunction, forcing the rest of the IRS to stop taking unwarranted actions.45 Congress should provide the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate with greater resources so that it may better assist taxpayers suffering from wrongful IRS actions. The office should also be strengthened by, among other things: l Ensuring that the National Taxpayer Advocate can make his or her own personnel decisions to protect its independence; l Ensuring NTA access to files, meetings, and other information needed to assist taxpayers or investigate IRS administrative practices; l Requiring the IRS to address the NTA’s comments in final rules and including the NTA in deliberations prior to the release of a proposed rule; and l Authorizing the NTA to file amicus briefs independently. Administrative Burden. In 2021, Americans filed 261 million tax returns and an astounding 4.7 billion information returns (such as Form W-2s, Form 1098s and Form 1099s).46 Complying with tax law costs Americans more than $400 bil- lion annually, or about 2 percent of gross domestic product.47 Although the IRS — 701 — Department of the Treasury administers these reporting programs, most of this expense is mandated by Con- gress, not the IRS. One of the primary reasons that Congress mandates ever-increasing infor- mation reporting is that the Treasury Department and the Joint Committee on Taxation staff almost always overestimate how much revenue will be gained from still more burdensome information reporting, and they do not estimate or report private compliance costs. Congress and the Treasury Department must undertake a serious review of the information reporting regime and reduce the burden on the public—especially small businesses. Small businesses suffer disproportionately from complexity and administrative burdens. Costs do not increase linearly with size, so elevated administrative costs have an adverse effect on the competitiveness of small firms. Budget. The operating budget of the IRS should be held constant in real terms. The resources allocated to the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate should be increased by at least 20 percent (about $44 million). The Office of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion should be closed. Provided that IT management is changed; an effective, well-considered implementation plan is adopted; and serious oversight is put in place, additional resources dedicated solely to IT modernization may be warranted. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The Treasury Department should withdraw from Senate consideration the Protocol Amending the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters.48 The protocol will lead to substantially more transnational identity theft, crime, industrial espionage, financial fraud, and suppression of political oppo- nents and religious or ethnic minorities by authoritarian and corrupt governments, including China, Colombia, Nigeria, and Russia. Unlike the original multilateral convention, the amended convention is open to all governments—including many that are either hostile to the United States, have serious corruption problems, or have inadequate privacy protections. The new Administration should also oppose the multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information.49 International organizations such as the OECD, the World Bank, and the Inter- national Monetary Fund espouse economic theories and policies that are inimical to American free market and limited government principles. The global elites who operate the IMF regularly advance higher taxes and big centralized government. The IMF has intervened in American policy debates—and has even recommended that the U.S. raise taxes. The IMF’s record of advancing global financial stability has been mixed at best. Its development assistance and lending programs in third- world countries have more often than not retarded growth rather than advancing it. The Treasury Department plays an important role in these international institutions and should force reforms and new policies. The U.S., however, should

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills