BLOCK PUTIN Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/8219

Last Updated: July 16, 2026

BLOCK PUTIN Act

HR. 8219, 119th Congress — read as touching Oil & Gas.

The sponsor

Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$73,500 raised

22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of State" section, p. 214-216 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H2984)

April 19, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The BLOCK PUTIN Act, HR 8219, is a congressional bill that aims to encourage Hungary to end its reliance on Russian energy and prevent the country's efforts to obstruct financial or security assistance to Ukraine. As a self-serving billionaire political analyst, I will provide a comprehensive summary of this bill, focusing on its wealth and power implications.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to hold Hungary accountable for its actions that undermine the national security interests of the United States. Specifically, it seeks to discourage Hungary from continuing to purchase Russian oil and gas, which provides significant revenue to the Russian Federation. The bill also aims to prevent Hungary from blocking or delaying financial or security assistance to Ukraine.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The BLOCK PUTIN Act imposes sanctions on senior officials of the Hungarian government who take steps to block or obstruct additional financial or security assistance to Ukraine, or who approve or continue to facilitate oil or natural gas imports from Russia. These sanctions include blocking property and prohibiting transactions in property and interests in property within the United States. Additionally, the bill renders certain individuals inadmissible to the United States and ineligible for visas or other documentation.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary affected parties are Hungary, Ukraine, and the Russian Federation. The bill also impacts senior officials of the Hungarian government, who may face sanctions, as well as companies involved in energy trade between Hungary and Russia. Furthermore, this legislation has implications for European Union member states, particularly those that have reduced their dependence on Russian fossil fuels.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The BLOCK PUTIN Act has significant implications for global energy markets and geopolitics. By targeting Hungarian officials who facilitate Russian energy imports, the bill aims to reduce Russia's revenue streams and undermine its influence in Eastern Europe. This could lead to a shift in Hungary's energy policy, potentially creating new opportunities for American energy companies. However, it may also escalate tensions between the United States and Russia, as well as within the European Union.

From my perspective, this bill presents both risks and opportunities. On one hand, it could disrupt global energy markets and create uncertainty for investors. On the other hand, it may provide a chance for American companies to expand their presence in Eastern Europe and capitalize on the region's growing demand for alternative energy sources. As a billionaire investor, I will be closely monitoring the developments surrounding this bill and adjusting my investment strategies accordingly.

In conclusion, the BLOCK PUTIN Act is a complex piece of legislation with far-reaching implications for global energy markets, geopolitics, and American business interests. Its potential impact on Hungary's energy policy, Russian revenue streams, and European Union dynamics makes it a critical development to watch in the coming months.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

As I taught you back in 8th grade, the legislative process begins with a bill's introduction, which is exactly what happened with HR 8219, the BLOCK PUTIN Act. This bill aims to encourage Hungary to end its reliance on Russian energy and prevent obstruction of financial or security assistance to Ukraine. Remember when we learned about the importance of committees in the legislative process? Well, this bill was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on the Judiciary, which will review and potentially amend it.

The main purpose of this bill is to hold Hungary accountable for its actions that undermine US national security interests, particularly with regards to energy dependence on Russia. The objectives are twofold: first, to encourage countries to diversify from Russian energy, and second, to support Ukraine through financial and security assistance. As we covered in 8th grade, a bill's findings section provides context and justification for the proposed legislation. In this case, the findings highlight Hungary's increased dependence on Russian energy, despite European Union efforts to reduce reliance on Russian fossil fuels.

The key provisions of this bill include imposing sanctions on senior Hungarian officials who block or obstruct assistance to Ukraine or facilitate oil or natural gas imports from Russia. These sanctions would block property and interests in property, as well as render individuals inadmissible to the United States. As I'm sure you recall, the system of checks and balances is designed to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. In this case, Congress is exercising its authority to impose sanctions, which could potentially be vetoed by the President or challenged in court.

The affected parties and stakeholders include Hungary, Ukraine, the European Union, and the United States. The potential impact and implications of this bill are significant, as it could lead to increased tensions between the US and Hungary, as well as affect energy markets and global security dynamics. Remember when we learned about the importance of understanding the context and motivations behind a bill? In this case, the BLOCK PUTIN Act is part of a broader effort to counter Russian influence and support Ukraine, highlighting the complex geopolitical landscape that underlies legislative decisions.

In conclusion, the BLOCK PUTIN Act is a prime example of how the legislative process works in practice. As we covered in 8th grade, a bill's introduction, committee review, and potential amendments are all crucial steps in shaping the final legislation. By understanding the main purpose, key provisions, affected parties, and potential impact of this bill, we can better appreciate the complexities of international relations and the role of Congress in shaping US foreign policy.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

The BLOCK PUTIN Act, folks! On the surface, it's about encouraging Hungary to ditch Russian energy and stop obstructing Ukraine aid. But let me tell you, there's more to it than meets the eye. This bill is a cleverly crafted web of sanctions, policies, and findings that reveal a deeper agenda.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated goal is to prevent Hungary from undermining US national security interests by relying on Russian energy and blocking Ukraine aid. But I believe this is just a smokescreen for the real objective: to further solidify the US-EU alliance against Russia and maintain control over global energy markets.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill imposes sanctions on Hungarian officials who block or obstruct Ukraine aid, and those who facilitate Russian oil imports. It also blocks property transactions and prohibits certain individuals from entering the US. But what's interesting is that it cites previous sanctions packages, like the 19th package of restrictive measures against Russia, which banned imports of Russian liquefied natural gas into the EU. This tells me that the US is trying to harmonize its policies with those of the EU, creating a united front against Russia.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Hungary, Slovakia, Ukraine, and Russia are directly impacted, but I'd argue that this bill has far-reaching implications for the entire European energy market. The US is essentially using Hungary as a test case to assert its influence over EU member states and shape their energy policies. And let's not forget the Chinese refineries and oil traders mentioned in the bill – they're also being targeted, which suggests that the US is trying to limit China's growing influence in global energy markets.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill could lead to a significant shift in European energy politics, with the US exerting more control over EU member states. It may also escalate tensions between the US and Russia, potentially even leading to further conflict. But here's the thing: what if this bill is not just about Hungary or Ukraine, but about setting a precedent for future interventions in global energy markets? What if it's part of a larger strategy to maintain US dominance over the global economy?

You see, folks, this bill is like a puzzle piece that fits into a much larger picture. It's a cleverly crafted move in a high-stakes game of global politics, and we need to be vigilant about the potential consequences. So, let's keep digging, shall we?

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(With a healthy dose of sarcasm and a smirk) Oh, folks, gather 'round! We've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here - the BLOCK PUTIN Act. (pausing for dramatic effect) Because, you know, freedom isn't free, and we need to protect it from those pesky Russians... and Hungarians, apparently.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to "encourage" Hungary to stop relying on Russian energy and prevent them from obstructing financial or security assistance to Ukraine. (air quotes) "Encourage" being the operative word here, because we all know how well sanctions work in changing a country's behavior... (wink). The objectives are clear: protect our national security interests, support Ukraine, and show those elites in Hungary who's boss.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill imposes sanctions on senior Hungarian officials who block or delay assistance to Ukraine or continue to facilitate oil or natural gas imports from Russia. (dramatic music plays) Oh, the horror! These sanctions include blocking property transactions and making certain individuals inadmissible to the United States. Because, you know, we need to keep those "bad guys" out of our great nation... (smirk).

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include Hungary, Ukraine, Russia, and the European Union. (in a mock-serious tone) Oh, the intricate web of international relations! The stakeholders are, of course, the American people, who will be protected from the evil clutches of Russian energy dependence... (eye roll).

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact is clear: this bill will either magically change Hungary's behavior or lead to a series of escalating sanctions and counter-sanctions. (shrugging) Who knows? Maybe it'll even start a new Cold War! The implications are far-reaching, folks: we're talking about the future of European energy security, the stability of the region, and the delicate balance of power between nations... (dramatic sigh). But hey, at least we'll be protecting our freedom... from those elites, of course.

(With a knowing smirk) And there you have it, folks - the BLOCK PUTIN Act. Because, in the immortal words of our great leaders, "We must protect our freedom, no matter the cost!" (wink). Now, let's get back to the real issue at hand: how this bill will affect our ratings... I mean, the American people. (chuckles)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the geniuses in Congress. The BLOCK PUTIN Act, because who doesn't love a good acronym? Let's dissect this farce and uncover the real motivations behind it.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's stated purpose is to encourage Hungary to end its reliance on Russian energy and prevent them from obstructing financial or security assistance to Ukraine. How noble. In reality, this is just a thinly veiled attempt to strong-arm Hungary into toeing the line with EU and US policies, while also providing a convenient distraction from the fact that the US has its own cozy relationships with authoritarian regimes.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill imposes sanctions on senior Hungarian officials who block or delay assistance to Ukraine or continue to facilitate oil or natural gas imports from Russia. Because, you know, sanctions have worked so well in the past (cough, Iran, cough). It also blocks property and interests of these individuals in the US, because who needs due process, anyway? The bill's findings section is a laundry list of obvious statements and cherry-picked facts, designed to create a narrative that justifies this legislative overreach.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Hungary, obviously, but also the EU, Ukraine, and Russia. Not to mention the poor souls who will be affected by the sanctions, including innocent Hungarian citizens and businesses. And let's not forget the real stakeholders: the politicians and lobbyists who will benefit from this bill, either financially or through increased influence.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has all the potential to escalate tensions between the US, EU, and Hungary, while also undermining the already fragile relationship between the West and Russia. The sanctions will likely have minimal impact on Hungary's energy policy, but will instead hurt ordinary citizens and small businesses. Meanwhile, the real issue – Europe's dependence on Russian energy – remains unaddressed, because that would require actual leadership and vision, rather than just grandstanding.

In conclusion, the BLOCK PUTIN Act is a textbook example of legislative malpractice: a misguided, heavy-handed, and ultimately ineffective attempt to address a complex geopolitical issue. It's a symptom of a deeper disease – the inability of politicians to think critically and act with integrity – and will only serve to further entrench the interests of those who benefit from conflict and instability. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this train wreck unfold.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Comprehensive Summary of the BLOCK PUTIN Act (HR 8219)**

### Introduction

The BLOCK PUTIN Act, introduced in the US House of Representatives on April 9, 2026, aims to encourage Hungary to reduce its dependence on Russian energy and prevent the country from obstructing financial or security assistance to Ukraine. This summary provides an overview of the bill's main purpose, key provisions, affected parties, and potential impacts.

### Main Purpose & Objectives

The primary objective of the BLOCK PUTIN Act is to promote European energy independence from Russia and support Ukraine in its conflict with Russia. The bill seeks to achieve this by encouraging Hungary to diversify its energy sources away from Russian oil and gas and preventing the country from blocking financial or security assistance to Ukraine.

### Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law

The bill includes several key provisions:

1. **Sense of Congress**: The bill expresses the sense of Congress that it is in the national security interests of the United States to encourage countries to diversify from Russian energy and for European Union member states to finance support for Ukraine. 2. **Statement of Policy**: The bill states that it shall be the policy of the United States to hold Hungary accountable for actions that undermine US national security interests, including blocking financial or security assistance to Ukraine. 3. **Imposition of Sanctions**: The President is required to impose sanctions on senior Hungarian officials who block, delay, or obstruct additional financial or security assistance to Ukraine or approve or facilitate oil or natural gas imports from Russia.

### Affected Parties & Stakeholders

The affected parties and stakeholders include:

1. **Hungary**: The bill targets Hungary's energy dependence on Russia and its actions that may undermine US national security interests. 2. **Ukraine**: The bill aims to support Ukraine by preventing Hungary from blocking financial or security assistance. 3. **European Union**: The bill encourages European Union member states to finance support for Ukraine and diversify their energy sources away from Russian oil and gas. 4. **United States**: The bill promotes US national security interests by encouraging European energy independence from Russia and supporting Ukraine.

### Potential Impact & Implications

The potential impact and implications of the BLOCK PUTIN Act include:

1. **Increased pressure on Hungary**: The bill may increase pressure on Hungary to reduce its dependence on Russian energy and support Ukraine. 2. **Improved European energy security**: By promoting European energy independence from Russia, the bill may contribute to improved energy security in the region. 3. **Enhanced US-Ukraine relations**: The bill demonstrates US support for Ukraine and may strengthen bilateral relations between the two countries. 4. **Potential diplomatic tensions**: The imposition of sanctions on Hungarian officials may lead to diplomatic tensions between the United States and Hungary.

In conclusion, the BLOCK PUTIN Act aims to promote European energy independence from Russia, support Ukraine, and hold Hungary accountable for actions that undermine US national security interests. The bill's provisions and potential impacts have significant implications for affected parties and

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's dive into the BLOCK PUTIN Act, bro. This congressional bill is all about encouraging Hungary to ditch its reliance on Russian energy and stop obstructing financial or security assistance to Ukraine.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main goal of this bill is to promote European energy independence from Russia and support Ukraine in its time of need. It's like, the US wants to help its buddies in Europe reduce their dependence on Russian oil and gas, which would be a major blow to Putin's economy, man.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes some significant changes, bro. It:

* Imposes sanctions on senior Hungarian officials who block or delay financial or security assistance to Ukraine * Targets individuals who facilitate oil or natural gas imports from Russia * Blocks property and interests in property of these individuals within the US * Makes them ineligible for visas, admission, or parole into the US

It's like, the US is saying, "Hey, Hungary, if you're gonna keep supporting Russia, we're gonna make it tough for your officials to do business with us."

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The main parties affected by this bill are:

* Hungary: They're the ones who've been increasing their dependence on Russian energy and blocking assistance to Ukraine * Ukraine: They're the ones who need financial and security support to deal with Russia's aggression * The US: We're the ones imposing sanctions and trying to promote European energy independence * The EU: They're also affected, as they're trying to reduce their dependence on Russian energy and provide support to Ukraine

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is huge, bro. If Hungary reduces its dependence on Russian energy, it could:

* Weaken Putin's economy and reduce his ability to fund aggression in Ukraine * Promote European energy independence and security * Strengthen the US-EU alliance and demonstrate our commitment to supporting Ukraine

However, there are also potential risks, man. If Hungary doesn't comply, it could lead to further tensions between the US and Hungary, and potentially even affect the stability of the EU.

Anyway, that's the lowdown on the BLOCK PUTIN Act, bro. It's a complex issue, but basically, the US is trying to promote European energy independence and support Ukraine, while also putting pressure on Hungary to stop supporting Russia.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Comprehensive Summary of the BLOCK PUTIN Act (HR 8219)**

The BLOCK PUTIN Act, introduced by Reps. Kaptur and Bacon, aims to encourage Hungary to end its reliance on Russian energy and prevent the country from obstructing financial or security assistance to Ukraine.

**1. Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to hold Hungary accountable for its actions that undermine the national security interests of the United States, particularly with regards to its continued dependence on Russian energy and obstruction of support for Ukraine. The bill seeks to promote European energy diversification, support Ukraine's defense efforts, and counter Russian influence in the region.

**2. Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill imposes sanctions on senior Hungarian officials who block or obstruct additional financial or security assistance to Ukraine or facilitate oil or natural gas imports from Russia. These sanctions include: * Blocking of property and interests in property within the United States * Inadmissibility of certain individuals, including ineligibility for visas, admission, or parole

The bill also states that it is the sense of Congress that European Union member states should finance support for Ukraine and that the United States should encourage countries to diversify from Russian energy.

**3. Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The key stakeholders affected by this bill include: * Hungary: The Hungarian government and senior officials who may face sanctions * Russia: The Russian Federation, which stands to lose revenue from reduced energy exports to Hungary * Ukraine: The Ukrainian government and people, who may benefit from increased financial and security assistance * European Union: EU member states, particularly those that have already reduced their dependence on Russian energy, may be impacted by Hungary's actions

**4. Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill includes: * Increased pressure on Hungary to reduce its dependence on Russian energy and support Ukraine's defense efforts * Strengthened transatlantic cooperation and unity in the face of Russian aggression * Potential economic consequences for Hungary, including reduced access to international financial markets and decreased foreign investment * Enhanced U.S. leverage to influence European energy policy and counter Russian influence in the region

In terms of monied interests, it is likely that the bill has the support of various PACs and industry lobby groups, such as those representing the Ukrainian-American community, the defense industry, and energy companies seeking to expand their presence in Europe. For example, the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America (UCCA) and the American-Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce may be backing this bill due to their interests in promoting U.S.-Ukraine relations and supporting Ukraine's defense efforts. Additionally, energy companies like ExxonMobil and Chevron, which have significant investments in European energy infrastructure, may also be supporting this bill as it aligns with their interests in diversifying Europe's energy supply away from Russian sources.

The Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on the Judiciary will play a crucial role

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$73,500

22 donors

PACs

Organizations

$7,300

Committees

Individuals

$66,200

No PAC contributions found

HECATE ENERGY LLC

1 transaction

$4,000

RMS INVESTMENT GROUP LLC

1 transaction

$3,300

No committee contributions found

HOWLEY, JO ANN

1 transaction

$3,500

ANSPACH, ROBERT

1 transaction

$3,300

BRANDT, JANICE

1 transaction

$3,300

CHOWDHURY, MANIDIPA

1 transaction

$3,300

CHOWDHURY, SAILESH

1 transaction

$3,300

CONOVER, CATHERINE M

1 transaction

$3,300

EGNOR, DANIEL

1 transaction

$3,300

HELLMAN, FRANCES

1 transaction

$3,300

LANDAU, JON

1 transaction

$3,300

MAESE, KAREN

1 transaction

$3,300

MAESE, TIMOTHY

1 transaction

$3,300

MOORE, WILLIAM

1 transaction

$3,300

MOURAD-FRIEDMAN, SENA

1 transaction

$3,300

CLUBOK, ANDY

1 transaction

$3,300

HUGHES, CARL F F

1 transaction

$3,300

MORINO, MARIO

1 transaction

$3,300

PEPPER, FRANCES G

1 transaction

$3,300

SHACKELFORD, LEE

1 transaction

$3,300

CANNEY, LES

1 transaction

$3,300

CASEY, GEORGE

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Bacon, Don [R-NE-2]

ID: B001298

Top Contributors

ONEIDA NATION

OrganizationONEIDA, WI

$3,300

Mar 28, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$3,300

Mar 28, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$3,300

Mar 28, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Jun 27, 2023

ONEIDA NATION

OrganizationONEIDA, WI

$3,300

Jun 30, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$2,000

Jun 27, 2023

REPUBLICAN MAIN STREET PARTNERSHIP

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$1,000

Jul 11, 2024

CARSON, RUSSELL S.

THE CARSON FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST • PHILANTHROPY

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Apr 24, 2024

FRANK, JIM

2FILLC • EXEC

IndividualWINNETKA, IL

$6,600

Apr 23, 2024

DANIELS, BRANDON

EXIGER • CEO

IndividualRICHMOND, VA

$6,600

Apr 21, 2024

Rep. Goodlander, Maggie [D-NH-2]

ID: G000604

Top Contributors

MCLAUGHLIN, JANE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualLYME, NH

$4,500

Aug 24, 2024

FLORY, ROBERT H. JR

FLORY INVESTMENTS, INC. • PRESIDENT

IndividualDAMARISCOTTA, ME

$4,100

Sep 30, 2024

FLORY, ROBERT H. JR

FLORY INVESTMENTS, INC. • PRESIDENT

IndividualDAMARISCOTTA, ME

$4,100

Sep 30, 2024

KRAUSZ, STEVEN

US VENTURE PARTNERS • VENTURE CAPITAL

IndividualPORTOLA VALLEY, CA

$3,300

Oct 23, 2024

HIRSHBERG, GARY

STONYFIELD FARM INC. • SENIOR ADVISOR

IndividualCONCORD, NH

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

DRAKE, LAWRENCE C JR

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualPORTSMOUTH, NH

$3,300

Oct 19, 2024

CUTLER, DOULGAS

CUTLER MANAGEMENT CORP • MANAGEMENT

IndividualDANIA, FL

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

JAMES, AMABEL

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Oct 24, 2024

NUNNELLY, MARK

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualDOVER, MA

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

ROBY, DAVID M.

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualLYME, NH

$3,300

Oct 28, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 54 nodes and 28 connections (45 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $96,100

Top Donors - Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9]

Showing top 22 donors by contribution amount

2 Orgs20 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 harmed.

−Oil & Gasconfidence 0.90
Section 4(b)(2) targets senior officials of the Government of Hungary who approve or continue to facilitate oil or natural gas imports from the Russian Federation, imposing sanctions that would hinder such activities, thus harming the oil and gas industry involved in Russian energy trade.
−Pipelines & Energy Infrastructureconfidence 0.85
Section 4(b)(2) also covers facilitation of natural gas imports from Russia, which implicates energy infrastructure such as pipelines (e.g., Druzhba pipeline mentioned in findings) and related midstream operators, subjecting them to sanctions if involved in Russian energy trade.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HARMS

Oil & Gas$500
from 1 contribution
- BRENSKELLE, LISA A$500

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of State

Strong

Vector: 62%

Pages: 214-216AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The BLOCK PUTIN Act aligns with Project 2025's Department of State section by supporting continued U.S. involvement in Ukraine through security and financial aid, opposing Russian aggression, and promoting European energy independence from Russia—consistent with the interventionist conservative viewpoint that views defeating Putin as a national security priority."

Key themes:Ukraine supportRussian energy dependenceNATO unitydefeat of PutinEuropean security

— 182 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l One school of conservative thought holds that as Moscow’s illegal war of aggression against Ukraine drags on, Russia presents major challenges to U.S. interests, as well as to peace, stability, and the post-Cold War security order in Europe. This viewpoint argues for continued U.S. involvement including military aid, economic aid, and the presence of NATO and U.S. troops if necessary. The end goal of the conflict must be the defeat of Russian President Vladimir Putin and a return to pre-invasion border lines. l Another school of conservative thought denies that U.S. Ukrainian support is in the national security interest of America at all. Ukraine is not a member of the NATO alliance and is one of the most corrupt nations in the region. European nations directly affected by the conflict should aid in the defense of Ukraine, but the U.S. should not continue its involvement. This viewpoint desires a swift end to the conflict through a negotiated settlement between Ukraine and Russia. l The tension between these competing positions has given rise to a third approach. This conservative viewpoint eschews both isolationism and interventionism. Rather, each foreign policy decision must first ask the question: What is in the interest of the American people? U.S. military engagement must clearly fall within U.S. interests; be fiscally responsible; and protect American freedom, liberty, and sovereignty, all while recognizing Communist China as the greatest threat to U.S. interests. Thus, with respect to Ukraine, continued U.S. involvement must be fully paid for; limited to military aid (while European allies address Ukraine’s economic needs); and have a clearly defined national security strategy that does not risk American lives. Regardless of viewpoints, all sides agree that Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is unjust and that the Ukrainian people have a right to defend their homeland. Furthermore, the conflict has severely weakened Putin’s military strength and provided a boost to NATO unity and its importance to European nations. The next conservative President has a generational opportunity to bring res- olution to the foreign policy tensions within the movement and chart a new path forward that recognizes Communist China as the defining threat to U.S. interests in the 21st century. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Peace and stability in Northeast Asia are vital interests of the United States. The Republic of Korea (South Korea) and Japan are critical allies for ensuring a free and open Indo–Pacific. They are indispensable military, economic, diplomatic, and technology partners. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK, or North — 183 — Department of State Korea) must be deterred from military conflict. The United States cannot permit the DPRK to remain a de facto nuclear power with the capacity to threaten the United States or its allies. This interest is both critical to the defense of the Amer- ican homeland and the future of global nonproliferation. The DPRK must not be permitted to profit from its blatant violations of international commitments or to threaten other nations with nuclear blackmail. Both interests can only be served if the U.S. disallows the DPRK’s rogue regime behavior. OTHER INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENTS Western Hemisphere The United States has a vested interest in a relatively united and economically prosperous Western Hemisphere. Nonetheless, the region now has an overwhelm- ing number of socialist or progressive regimes, which are at odds with the freedom and growth-oriented policies of the U.S. and other neighbors and who increasingly pose hemispheric security threats. A new approach is therefore needed, one that simultaneously allows the U.S. to re-posture in its best interests and helps regional partners enter a new century of growth and opportunity. The following core policies must be part of this new direction: l A “sovereign Mexico” policy. Mexico is currently a national security disaster. Bluntly stated, Mexico can no longer qualify as a first-world nation; it has functionally lost its sovereignty to muscular criminal cartels that effectively run the country. The current dynamic is not good for either U.S. citizens or Mexicans, and the perfect storm created by this cartel state has negative effects that are damaging the entire hemisphere. The next Administration must both adopt a posture that calls for a fully sovereign Mexico and take all steps at its disposal to support that result in as rapid a fashion as possible. l A fentanyl-free frontier. The same cartels that parasitically run Mexico are also working with the PRC to fuel the largest drug crisis in the history of North America. These Mexican cartels are working closely with Chinese fentanyl precursor chemical manufacturers, importing those precursor chemicals into Mexico, manufacturing fentanyl on Mexican soil, and shipping it into the United States and elsewhere. The highly potent narcotic is having an unprecedented lethal impact on the American citizenry. The next Administration must leverage its new insistence on a sovereign Mexico and work with other Western Hemisphere partners to halt the fentanyl crisis and put a decisive end to this unprecedented public health threat.

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Moderate

Vector: 61%

Pages: 443-445AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the BLOCK PUTIN Act and the Project 2025 DOE section emphasize energy security and reducing reliance on adversarial energy sources, though the bill focuses on foreign sanctions while Project 2025 centers on domestic grid modernization and clean energy initiatives."

Key themes:energy securityreducing Russian energy dependencegrid resilienceclean energy transition

— 411 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions 19. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13920, “Securing the United States Bulk-Power System,” May 1, 2020, in Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 86 (May 4, 2020), pp. 26595–26599, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2020-05-04/pdf/2020-09695.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 20. 18 U.S. Code § 824a(c), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/824a (accessed February 27, 2023). 21. Report No. 117-98, Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, 2022, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. House of Representatives, 117th Cong. 1st Sess., July 20, 2021, p. 6, https:// www.congress.gov/117/crpt/hrpt98/CRPT-117hrpt98.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 22. H.R. 3684, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law No. 11-58, 117th Congress, November 15, 2021, Division J, Title III. 23. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, p. 7. 24. Timothy Gardner, “White House Asks Congress for $500 mln to Modernize Oil Reserve,” Reuters, November 16, 2022, https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-oil-spr-idAFL1N32C36I (accessed February 13, 2023). 25. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity, “Our History,” https://www.energy.gov/oe/about-us/our- history (accessed February 13, 2023). 26. Press release, “Secretary of Energy Signs Order to Mitigate Security Risks to the Nation’s Electric Grid,” U.S. Department of Energy, December 17, 2021, https://www.energy.gov/articles/secretary-energy-signs-order- mitigate-security-risks-nations-electric-grid (accessed February 13, 2023). 27. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity, “Revocation of Prohibition Order Securing Critical Defense Facilities,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 76 (April 22, 2021), pp. 21308–21309, https://www.govinfo.gov/ content/pkg/FR-2021-04-22/pdf/2021-08483.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 28. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 19 and 61. 29. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, “About Us,” https://www.energy.gov/ne/about-us (accessed February 13, 2023). 30. H.R. 3809, Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, Public Law No. 97-425, 97th Congress, January 7, 1983, https:// www.congress.gov/97/statute/STATUTE-96/STATUTE-96-Pg2201.pdf (accessed February 24, 2023). 31. The Heritage Foundation, “Budget Blueprint for Fiscal Year 2023: Reduce the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy,” https://www.heritage.org/budget/pages/recommendations/1.270.127.html. 32. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 23 and 58. 33. 42 USC § 16291, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/16291 (accessed February 27, 2023). 34. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, “About Us: Mission,” https:// www.energy.gov/fecm/mission (accessed February 13, 2023). 35. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Carbon Capture and Storage: Actions Needed to Improve DOE Management of Demonstration Projects, GAO-22-105111, December2021, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-22- 105111.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 36. International Energy Agency, The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions, World Energy Outlook Special Report, revised March 2022, https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ffd2a83b-8c30-4e9d-980a- 52b6d9a86fdc/TheRoleofCriticalMineralsinCleanEnergyTransitions.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 37. See 42 U.S. Code § 16291. 38. 42 U.S. Code Ch. 55, §§ 4321–4347, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/chapter-55 (accessed February 27, 2023). 39. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Categorical Exclusions from Environmental Review,” Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Request for Comment, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 87 (May 7, 2021), pp. 24514–24516, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-05-07/pdf/2021-09675.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023), and Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Categorical Exclusions from Environmental Review,” Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Reopening of Comment Period, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 160 (August 23, 2021), pp. 47032–47033, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-08-23/pdf/2021-18058.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023). 40. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 19, 21, 23, and 52. — 412 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 41. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 3, 6, 12, 19, 21, and 23. 42. S. 622, Energy Policy and Conservation Act, Public Law 94-163, 94th Congress, December 22, 1975, https:// www.congress.gov/94/statute/STATUTE-89/STATUTE-89-Pg871.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023). 43. H.R. 6, Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law No. 109-58, 109th Congress, August 8, 2005, https://www. congress.gov/109/plaws/publ58/PLAW-109publ58.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023). 44. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, “About the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy,” https://www.energy.gov/eere/about-office-energy-efficiency-and- renewable-energy (accessed February 28, 2023). 45. Ibid. 46. See note 41, supra. 47. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 19, 23, 43, and 49. 48. See U.S. Department of Energy, Grid Deployment Office, “About Us,” https://www.energy.gov/gdo/about-us (accessed February 13, 2023). 49. U.S. Department of Energy, Grid Deployment Office, “Building a Better Grid Initiative,” https://www.energy. gov/gdo/building-better-grid-initiative (accessed February 13, 2023). 50. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 2, 19, 21, 23, and 84. “The FY 2023 Budget Request to Congress proposes to split the Electricity appropriation account into two accounts: Electricity and Grid Deployment Office (GDO). Had the proposed FY 2023 structure been in place in FY 2021 and FY 2022, the $7,000,000 shown under the Electricity account’s Transmission Permitting and Technical Assistance (TPTA) program would have appeared under Grid Technical Assistance in GDO and the $3,000,000 shown under Program Direction in the Electricity account represents the estimated share of Electricity PD funding associated with TPTA and would have appeared under Program Direction in GDO.” Ibid., p. 84, note. 51. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, “About Us: Our Mission,” https://www. energy.gov/oced/about-us (accessed February 13, 2023). 52. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, p. 6. 53. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, “About Us: Our Story,” https://www. energy.gov/oced/about-us (accessed February 28, 2023). 54. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, “OCED Project Portfolio,” https://www. energy.gov/oced/office-clean-energy-demonstrations (accessed February 28, 2023). 55. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Volume 3, Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response, Federal Energy Management Program, Grid Deployment Office, Indian Energy Policy & Programs, Loan Programs, Manufacturing & Energy Supply Chains, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, Petroleum Reserves, Power Marketing Administrations, State and Community Energy Programs, April 2022, p. 104, https://www.energy. gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/doe-fy2023-budget-volume-3-v2.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 56. See, for example, ibid., pp. 104 and 107. 57. U.S. Department of Energy, Loan Program Office, “LPO Year in Review 2022: New Legislation,” January 5, 2023, https://www.energy.gov/lpo/articles/lpo-year-review-2022 (accessed February 28, 2023). Emphases in original. 58. H.R. 6256, To Ensure That Goods Made with Forced Labor in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China Do Not Enter the United States Market, and for Other Purposes, Public Law No. 117-78, 117th Congress, December 23, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ78/PLAW-117publ78.pdf (accessed February 28, 2023). 59. H.R. 2272, America COMPETES Act, Public Law 110–69, 110th Congress, August 9, 2007, § 5012, https://www. congress.gov/110/plaws/publ69/PLAW-110publ69.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 60. Ibid., § 5012(c)(1). 61. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, March 2022, p. 103.

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Moderate

Vector: 61%

Pages: 443-445AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The BLOCK PUTIN Act aligns with Project 2025's emphasis on energy security and reducing dependence on foreign energy sources, particularly through promoting diversification away from Russian energy. However, the bill focuses on foreign policy and sanctions rather than domestic energy department reforms or internal DOE restructuring outlined in the Project 2025 section."

Key themes:energy securityreducing Russian energy dependenceenergy diversification

— 410 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. Sean Michael Kerner, “Colonial Pipeline Hack Explained: Everything You Need to Know,” TechTarget, April, 26, 2022, https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/Colonial-Pipeline-hack-explained-Everything-you-need-to- know (accessed February 13, 2023). 2. Jacob Knutson, “N.C. Power Company: Substation Repairs Complete After Alleged Attack,” Axios, December 7, 2022, https://www.axios.com/2022/12/07/duke-energy-moore-county-substation-attack (accessed February 13, 2023). 3. H.R. 3684, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law No. 117-58, 117th Congress, November 15, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ58/PLAW-117publ58.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 4. H.R. 5376, Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-169, August 16, 2022, https://www.congress. gov/117/plaws/publ169/PLAW-117publ169.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 5. S. 826, Department of Energy Organization Act, Public Law 95-91, 95th Congress, August 4, 1977, https://www. congress.gov/95/statute/STATUTE-91/STATUTE-91-Pg565.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 6. DOE also promotes domestic energy security by providing research and coordination between government and the private sector on physical and cyber-related threats to energy security. This work should continue and be enhanced under the next Administration. 7. Elimination of OE, NE, FE, and EERE might also be considered; however, there are benefits from having political appointees run separate offices. Specifically, separate program offices can focus on threats that are unique to their energy areas, and having political appointees run separate offices helps to ensure focused, unobstructed pursuit of policy objectives. 8. H.R. 6586, Natural Gas Act, Public Law No. 75-688, 75th Congress, June 21, 1938, https://govtrackus. s3.amazonaws.com/legislink/pdf/stat/52/STATUTE-52-Pg821a.pdf (accessed February 24, 2023). 9. U.S. Department of Energy, “Promoting Energy Justice,” https://www.energy.gov/promoting-energy-justice (accessed February 13, 2023). 10. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Economic Impact and Diversity, “Justice40 Initiative,” https://www. energy.gov/diversity/justice40-initiative (accessed February 13, 2023). 11. Press release, “DOE Releases First-Ever Plan to Advance Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility,” U.S. Department of Energy, September 1, 2022, https://www.energy.gov/articles/doe-releases-first-ever-plan- advance-diversity-equity-inclusion-and-accessibility (accessed February 14, 2023). 12. Including the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, etc. 13. Table, “Environmental Management: Lifecycle Cost by Project Baseline Summary (PBS) ($M),” in U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Volume 6, Environmental Management, April 2022, p. 53, https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/ files/2022-09/doe-fy2023-budget-volume-6-em-v3.pd (accessed February 13, 2023). 14. KPMG, “Independent Auditor’s Report, United States Department of Energy Nuclear Waste Fund Annual Financial Report as of and for the Years Ended September 30, 2022 and 2021,” November 8, 2022, p. 8, in U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Inspector General, Office of Cyber Assessments and Data Analytics, Audit Report: The Department of Energy Nuclear Waste Fund’s Fiscal Year 2022 Financial Statement Audit, DOE- OIG-23-05, November 2022, p. 10, https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-11/DOE-OIG-23-05.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 15. See Patty-Jane Geller, “U.S. Nuclear Weapons,” in 2023 Index of U.S. Military Strength, ed. Dakota L. Wood (Washington: The Heritage Foundation, 2023), pp. 481–506, http://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/2022/ Military_Index/2023_IndexOfUSMilitaryStrength.pdf. 16. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, March 2022, pp. 9, 21, 23, and 43, https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/ files/2022-03/doe-fy2023-budget-in-brief-v2.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 17. H.R. 4346, CHIPS and Science Act, Public Law No. 117-167, 117th Congress, August 9, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ167/PLAW-117publ167.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 18. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response, “About Us,” https://www.energy.gov/ceser/ceser-mission (accessed February 27, 2023). — 411 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions 19. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13920, “Securing the United States Bulk-Power System,” May 1, 2020, in Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 86 (May 4, 2020), pp. 26595–26599, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2020-05-04/pdf/2020-09695.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 20. 18 U.S. Code § 824a(c), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/824a (accessed February 27, 2023). 21. Report No. 117-98, Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, 2022, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. House of Representatives, 117th Cong. 1st Sess., July 20, 2021, p. 6, https:// www.congress.gov/117/crpt/hrpt98/CRPT-117hrpt98.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 22. H.R. 3684, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law No. 11-58, 117th Congress, November 15, 2021, Division J, Title III. 23. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, p. 7. 24. Timothy Gardner, “White House Asks Congress for $500 mln to Modernize Oil Reserve,” Reuters, November 16, 2022, https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-oil-spr-idAFL1N32C36I (accessed February 13, 2023). 25. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity, “Our History,” https://www.energy.gov/oe/about-us/our- history (accessed February 13, 2023). 26. Press release, “Secretary of Energy Signs Order to Mitigate Security Risks to the Nation’s Electric Grid,” U.S. Department of Energy, December 17, 2021, https://www.energy.gov/articles/secretary-energy-signs-order- mitigate-security-risks-nations-electric-grid (accessed February 13, 2023). 27. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity, “Revocation of Prohibition Order Securing Critical Defense Facilities,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 76 (April 22, 2021), pp. 21308–21309, https://www.govinfo.gov/ content/pkg/FR-2021-04-22/pdf/2021-08483.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 28. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 19 and 61. 29. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, “About Us,” https://www.energy.gov/ne/about-us (accessed February 13, 2023). 30. H.R. 3809, Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, Public Law No. 97-425, 97th Congress, January 7, 1983, https:// www.congress.gov/97/statute/STATUTE-96/STATUTE-96-Pg2201.pdf (accessed February 24, 2023). 31. The Heritage Foundation, “Budget Blueprint for Fiscal Year 2023: Reduce the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy,” https://www.heritage.org/budget/pages/recommendations/1.270.127.html. 32. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 23 and 58. 33. 42 USC § 16291, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/16291 (accessed February 27, 2023). 34. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, “About Us: Mission,” https:// www.energy.gov/fecm/mission (accessed February 13, 2023). 35. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Carbon Capture and Storage: Actions Needed to Improve DOE Management of Demonstration Projects, GAO-22-105111, December2021, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-22- 105111.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 36. International Energy Agency, The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions, World Energy Outlook Special Report, revised March 2022, https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ffd2a83b-8c30-4e9d-980a- 52b6d9a86fdc/TheRoleofCriticalMineralsinCleanEnergyTransitions.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 37. See 42 U.S. Code § 16291. 38. 42 U.S. Code Ch. 55, §§ 4321–4347, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/chapter-55 (accessed February 27, 2023). 39. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Categorical Exclusions from Environmental Review,” Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Request for Comment, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 87 (May 7, 2021), pp. 24514–24516, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-05-07/pdf/2021-09675.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023), and Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Categorical Exclusions from Environmental Review,” Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Reopening of Comment Period, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 160 (August 23, 2021), pp. 47032–47033, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-08-23/pdf/2021-18058.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023). 40. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 19, 21, 23, and 52.

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Moderate

Vector: 60%

Pages: 443-445AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The BLOCK PUTIN Act aligns with Project 2025's emphasis on energy security and reducing dependence on adversarial energy sources, particularly Russian oil and gas, by promoting diversification and accountability. However, the bill focuses on foreign policy and sanctions rather than domestic DOE restructuring or program eliminations outlined in Project 2025."

Key themes:energy securityreducing Russian energy dependencepromoting energy independence

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal

Vector: 58%

Pages: 201-204AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The BLOCK PUTIN Act focuses on foreign policy sanctions targeting Hungary's energy ties to Russia and support for Ukraine, whereas the Project 2025 DHS section addresses domestic homeland security matters such as immigration, border security, and agency operations. There is no substantive thematic overlap between the two."

Key themes:national securityforeign policy

— 168 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. H.R. 5005, Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law No. 107-296, 107th Congress, November 25, 2002, § 101(b)(1), https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ296/PLAW-107publ296.pdf (accessed March 14, 2023). 2. See, for example, “Elon Musk Slams CISA Censorship Network as ‘Propaganda Platform,’” Kanekoa News, December 28, 2022, https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/elon-musk-slams-cisa-censorship-network (accessed March 14, 2023). 3. H.R. 2680, An Act to Amend the Immigration and Nationality Act, and for Other Purposes, Public Law No. 89-236, 89th Congress, October 3, 1965, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-79/pdf/STATUTE-79- Pg911.pdf (accessed March 14, 2023). 4. Added to the Immigration and Nationality Act by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. See H.R. 3610, Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997, Public Law No. 104-208, 104th Congress, September 30, 1996, Division C, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ208/ PLAW-104publ208.pdf (accessed March 14, 2023). 5. 8 U.S. Code, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8 (accessed March 14, 2023). 6. 18 U.S. Code, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18 (accessed March 14, 2023). 7. 5 U.S. Code §§ 551–559, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/part-I/chapter-5/subchapter-II (accessed March 14, 2023). 8. Table, “United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Budget Comparison and Adjustments Appropriation and PPA Summary,” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Budget Overview, Fiscal Year 2023 Congressional Justification, p. CIS-4, https://www.uscis.gov/ sites/default/files/document/reports/U.S._Citizenship_and_Immigration_Services%E2%80%99_Budget_ Overview_Document_for%20Fiscal_Year_2023.pdf#:~:text=The%20FY%202023%20Budget%20includes%20 %24913.6M%2C%204%2C001%20positions%3B,of%20%24444.1M%20above%20the%20FY%202022%20 President%E2%80%99s%20Budget (accessed March 14, 2023), and Table, “United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Comparison of Budget Authority and Request,” in ibid., p. CIS-5. 9. H.R. 7311, William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, Public Law No. 110-457, 110th Congress, December 23, 2008, § 235, https://www.congress.gov/110/plaws/publ457/PLAW- 110publ457.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 10. Matter of A-B-, Respondent, 27 I&N Dec. 316 (A.G. 2018), https://www.justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1070866/ download (accessed January 18, 2023). 11. Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/567/387/ (accessed January 18, 2023). 12. Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act [Public Law 93–288; Approved May 22, 1974] [As Amended Through P.L. 117–328, Enacted December 29, 2022], https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ COMPS-2977/pdf/COMPS-2977.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 13. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Budget Overview, Fiscal Year 2023 Congressional Justification, p. FEMA-24, https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/Federal%20Emergency%20 Management%20Agency_Remediated.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 14. Report, United States Secret Service: An Agency in Crisis, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives, 114th Congress, December 9, 2015, https://republicans-oversight.house.gov/ wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Oversight-USSS-Report.pdf (accessed January 18, 2023). 15. 5 U.S. Code § 7103, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7103 (accessed March 15, 2023). 16. S. 3418, Privacy Act of 1974, Public Law No. 93-579, 93rd Congress, December 31, 1974, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg1896.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 17. H.R. 1428, Judicial Redress Act of 2015, Public Law No. 114-126, 114th Congress, February 24, 2016, https://www. congress.gov/114/plaws/publ126/PLAW-114publ126.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 18. H.R. 1158, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, Public Law No. 116-93, 116th Congress, December 20, 2019, https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1158 (accessed January 18, 2023).

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Kaptur, Marcy

Ratepayer Justice and Commercial Power Accountability Act

119/hr/9700

Great Lakes Gateways Network Act of 2025

119/hr/1073

Back to All Bills