The bill
National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Reauthorization Act of 2025
S. 320, 119th Congress — read as touching Construction & Engineering.
Sponsored by
Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA]
ID: P000145
Follow the money
The bill
S. 320, 119th Congress — read as touching Construction & Engineering.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
29 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Held at the desk.
January 6, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Reauthorization Act of 2025 is a rehashing of the original 1977 act, with some minor tweaks and additions. The main purpose is to reauthorize funding for earthquake hazard reduction programs, because, you know, earthquakes are still a thing. The objectives are to reduce earthquake risks, improve preparedness, and enhance community resilience. Yawn.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes some minor changes to the existing law, including:
* Expanding the definition of "earthquake hazards" to include secondary effects like tsunamis (because who doesn't love a good tsunami?) * Adding Tribal governments to the list of entities that can receive funding and support (because it's about time we included our Native American friends in the earthquake party) * Updating the language to include "evaluation, retrofitting, and functional recovery" (code for "we're going to spend more money on studies and consultants") * Increasing the estimated annualized earthquake losses from $14.7 billion to $107.8 trillion (because who needs accurate numbers when you can just make them up?)
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:
* Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) * United States Geological Survey (USGS) * National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) * Tribal governments * Local governments * Building owners and developers (who will no doubt benefit from the increased funding for retrofitting and evaluation)
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact of this bill will be negligible, except for the following:
* More money will be spent on studies, consultants, and bureaucratic overhead. * Some buildings might get retrofitted, but only if they're owned by wealthy developers or politicians with connections. * The earthquake early warning system might get a minor upgrade, but it's still going to be too slow to make a difference. * Tribal governments might receive some token funding, but it won't be enough to make a real difference.
In conclusion, this bill is a perfect example of legislative theater: all sound and fury, signifying nothing. It's a waste of time, money, and resources. But hey, at least the politicians can say they did something about earthquakes. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch paint dry.
Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: M001153
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 64 nodes and 32 connections (65 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $95,900
Showing top 23 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.
Section 5(a)(2)(B)(iv)(E)-(F) adds provisions for technical assistance to State, local, or Tribal governments regarding creation of inventories, seismic performance evaluations, and cost-effective best practices for retrofitting existing buildings, structures, and lifeline infrastructure, which directly benefits construction and engineering firms involved in retrofitting and seismic upgrades.