The bill
FDA Modernization Act 3.0
S. 355, 119th Congress — read as touching Pharmaceuticals.
Sponsored by
Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ]
ID: B001288
Follow the money
The bill
S. 355, 119th Congress — read as touching Pharmaceuticals.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Held at the desk.
December 16, 2025
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of bureaucratic doublespeak, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The FDA Modernization Act 3.0 - because who needs actual modernization when you can just rebrand the same old regulatory quagmire?
Let's dissect this legislative abomination:
**New regulations being created or modified:** Ah, the pièce de résistance: replacing "animal" tests with "nonclinical" tests in various sections of the Code of Federal Regulations. Wow, what a bold move! It's not like they're just rebranding the same old testing methods to appease animal rights activists and Big Pharma's PR departments.
**Affected industries and sectors:** The pharmaceutical industry, biotech companies, and anyone who wants to bring new treatments to market without being strangled by regulatory red tape. But don't worry, this bill will only "modernize" the FDA's approach, not actually streamline it or reduce bureaucratic hurdles.
**Compliance requirements and timelines:** The Secretary of Health and Human Services has a whole year to publish an interim final rule (because who needs actual public input or debate?). And if you're wondering what kind of "good cause" is required for this rule to take effect immediately, don't bother - it's exempt from that pesky requirement.
**Enforcement mechanisms and penalties:** Ah, the usual: vague language about ensuring "regulatory consistency" and "effectiveness." Translation: more power to the FDA to harass and intimidate companies into compliance. Penalties? Oh, those will be determined later, after the bill is passed and it's too late for anyone to care.
**Economic and operational impacts:** This bill will likely increase regulatory costs for companies, stifle innovation, and delay life-saving treatments from reaching patients. But hey, at least the FDA will have more power to justify its bloated budget!
Diagnosis: This bill is a classic case of "Regulatory Capture-itis" - where special interests (in this case, Big Pharma and animal rights groups) hijack the regulatory process to serve their own agendas, while politicians get to pretend they're doing something meaningful.
Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, followed by a strong injection of transparency and accountability. But don't hold your breath - in Washington, D.C., the only thing more abundant than hot air is the willingness to ignore reality.
Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 9 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: S001227
Top Contributors
10
ID: K000383
Top Contributors
10
ID: K000393
Top Contributors
10
ID: W000802
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001198
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001277
Top Contributors
10
ID: P000603
Top Contributors
10
ID: L000570
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001150
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 52 nodes and 37 connections (65 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $189,400
Showing top 12 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
Section 2(a)(1)(A) requires replacing references to 'animal' tests with 'nonclinical' tests in FDA regulations, which benefits pharmaceutical companies by allowing alternative testing methods that may reduce costs and accelerate drug development.
Section 2(a)(1)(A) amends regulations to replace animal test references with nonclinical tests, which benefits biotech firms engaged in drug development by enabling use of innovative non-animal testing approaches.
Section 2(a)(1)(A) updates CFR sections including 312.22(c) and others related to device testing, replacing animal test references with nonclinical tests, which benefits medical device manufacturers by expanding acceptable testing methods.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Booker, Cory A. [D-NJ])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.