A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 203 North Clay Street in Marshfield, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the "Edwin P. Hubble Post Office".

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/4052

Last Updated: September 14, 2026

A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 203 North Clay Street in Marshfield, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the "Edwin P. Hubble Post Office".

S. 4052, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Sen. Schmitt, Eric [R-MO]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$158,400 raised

25 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

55% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Executive Office of the President of the United States" section, p. 90-92 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 586.

September 13, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Summary of S. 4052: Edwin P. Hubble Post Office Designation Act**

**1. Main Purpose & Objectives** The sole purpose of S. 4052 is to rename the United States Postal Service facility at 203 North Clay Street in Marshfield, Missouri, as the “Edwin P. Hubble Post Office” in honor of the renowned astronomer Edwin Powell Hubble, who was born in Marshfield. This is a ceremonial, non-substantive bill with no policy, regulatory, or fiscal impact. Its objective is symbolic recognition—leveraging federal infrastructure to commemorate a local historical figure with national scientific stature. There is no attempt to alter USPS operations, funding, or service delivery; the bill functions purely as a naming tribute, a common use of congressional time for low-stakes, constituency-focused gestures.

**2. Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill contains two operative sections: - **Section 1(a)** mandates that the USPS facility at the specified address be officially known and designated as the “Edwin P. Hubble Post Office.” - **Section 1(b)** requires that any reference to this facility in federal law, maps, regulations, documents, or records be deemed a reference to the renamed facility. This amends no existing statutes beyond updating internal references. It imposes no new requirements on the USPS beyond administrative updates to signage, databases, and official correspondence—costs absorbed within routine operational budgets. There are no penalties, enforcement mechanisms, or compliance obligations introduced.

**3. Affected Parties & Stakeholders** - **Directly Affected:** The United States Postal Service (administrative burden of updating records and signage; negligible cost). - **Indirectly Affected:** Residents of Marshfield, Missouri (symbolic civic pride; potential minor boost to local heritage tourism). - **Broader Stakeholders:** Federal agencies and contractors that interact with the facility (must update internal references; minimal impact). - **Unaffected:** USPS customers, mail volume, service standards, labor relations, or pricing. No taxpayer funds are allocated or redirected. The bill creates no economic incentives, deregulatory effects, or opportunities for private-sector capture—it is purely a legislative honorific.

**4. Potential Impact & Implications** - **Wealth/Power Impact:** None. The bill generates no revenue, alters no regulatory landscape, and affects no market dynamics. It does not enhance the influence of any industry, lobby, or private entity. - **Precedent:** Reinforces Congress’s practice of using naming bills for non-controversial, locally popular figures—a low-opportunity-cost way to satisfy constituent service without engaging in substantive policymaking. - **Democratic Efficiency:** Exemplifies the inefficiency of legislative processes, as such bills consume committee time, floor debate, and administrative resources for zero tangible public policy return. A private individual or local government could achieve similar recognition without federal involvement. - **Strategic Takeaway:** From a wealth-and-power perspective, S. 4052 is irrelevant. It neither threatens nor advances concentrated interests. Its only value lies in its insignificance—a harmless distraction in the machinery of governance, emblematic of how legislative bandwidth is often allocated to symbolism over substance.

**Conclusion:** S. 4052 is a perfunctory, zero-impact renaming bill. It changes nothing materially, affects no stakeholders meaningfully, and serves only to affirm Congress’s capacity to perform ceremonial functions while avoiding actual governance. In the calculus of influence and efficiency, it rounds to zero.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

Main Purpose & Objectives: The sole purpose of S. 4052 is to rename the United States Postal Service facility at 203 North Clay Street in Marshfield, Missouri, as the "Edwin P. Hubble Post Office." This is a purely honorary designation intended to recognize Edwin P. Hubble, presumably for his local significance or contributions, though the bill text provides no biographical details. As we covered in 8th grade civics, such naming bills are common, low-stakes exercises in congressional procedure—meant to honor individuals without altering operational functions, funding, or services. The objective here is symbolic: to affix Hubble's name to a federal building as a permanent tribute.

Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law: The bill contains two operative sections. Subsection (a) formally designates the Marshfield USPS facility by its new name. Subsection (b) mandates that all existing references to the facility in federal laws, maps, regulations, documents, or records shall be interpreted as references to the "Edwin P. Hubble Post Office." This ensures legal and administrative continuity—no need to amend every individual citation post-renaming. Importantly, the bill changes nothing about the facility’s operations, budget, staffing, or services. It is amendatory only in the narrow sense of updating official nomenclature, a point we spent an entire unit on when discussing how Congress handles commemorative legislation versus substantive policy.

Affected Parties & Stakeholders: The primary affected party is the United States Postal Service, which must update signage, internal databases, and official correspondence to reflect the new name. Local stakeholders in Marshfield, Missouri—residents, businesses, and civic groups—may experience a sense of communal pride or recognition if Hubble has local ties. Federal agencies and contractors that reference the facility in documentation will need to adjust their records per subsection (b), though this is a routine administrative task. The general public is unaffected beyond potential awareness of the name change; mail delivery and retail services remain unchanged. Notably, no taxpayer funds are allocated for this renaming beyond minimal administrative costs, a detail that should have been obvious from our lessons on the distinction between authorization and appropriation.

Potential Impact & Implications: The impact is narrowly symbolic and administrative. Operationally, there will be zero effect on mail processing, delivery times, or customer service at the facility. The renaming may foster local historical awareness if Hubble’s legacy is promoted alongside the change, but the bill itself does not require any educational or commemorative programming. Precedent shows such bills rarely face opposition—they’re non-controversial, unanimous consent matters that allow legislators to claim credit for honoring constituents. That said, the sheer frequency of these measures raises questions about congressional bandwidth, though that’s a critique for another lesson. For now, remember: this bill exemplifies how Congress handles ceremonial recognition—separate from, and vastly simpler than, the substantive lawmaking we *should* be focusing on. If you’d paid attention in my class, you’d know this isn’t how major policy gets made.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

**Conspiracy Uncle’s Breakdown of S. 4052: The Edwin P. Hubble Post Office Act**

Alright, gather ’round the turkey carcass, folks—let’s talk about S. 4052, the so-called “Edwin P. Hubble Post Office” bill. On the surface? Just another feel-good naming resolution to honor the famed astronomer who discovered the universe is expanding. Marshfield, Missouri—Hubble’s birthplace—wants to slap his name on the local post office. Innocent enough, right? *Wrong.* This is never just about a name.

**1. Main Purpose & Objectives** Officially, the bill’s purpose is to designate the USPS facility at 203 North Clay Street in Marshfield, MO, as the “Edwin P. Hubble Post Office.” Sounds patriotic, educational, maybe even inspiring for kids staring at stamps instead of screens. But why now? Why this specific facility? And why is it being fast-tracked through the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee—*the* committee that oversees federal infrastructure, continuity of government, and emergency communications? Coincidence? I think not.

**2. Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill does two things: - Subsection (a): Officially renames the Marshfield post office. - Subsection (b): Mandates that *any* reference in federal law, maps, regulations, or documents to that facility must now be interpreted as referring to the “Edwin P. Hubble Post Office.”

Seems trivial? Maybe. But Subsection (b) is the sleeper clause. It creates a legal precedent: *Congress can retroactively redefine geographic references in federal records via simple naming bills.* Imagine the implications—what if they start renaming weather stations, FEMA hubs, or even nuclear silos under the guise of honoring local heroes? Suddenly, “referenced facility” in a continuity-of-government plan doesn’t mean what you thought it meant. Legal loophole? Or backdoor reprogramming of federal geography?

**3. Affected Parties & Stakeholders** - **Honorees:** Edwin Hubble’s legacy gets a shiny new mailbox. His family? Probably pleased. - **USPS Employees & Marshfield Residents:** Now work at a federally designated monument to cosmic expansion. Morale boost? Or subtle psychological conditioning? - **Federal Agencies:** Must update maps, databases, and legal references. A tiny administrative burden—but one that tests compliance and document-control systems. - **Conspiracy Theorists (like me):** We see a dry run for broader federal rebranding—maybe renaming facilities after figures tied to space, surveillance, or technocracy. Hubble Space Telescope? Already watching us. Now his name’s on a post office that handles *your* mail. Think about it.

**4. Potential Impact & Implications** Short-term: Marshfield gets a plaque. Tourists might stop by. Long-term: This bill normalizes the use of naming legislation to alter federal geographic references without amending underlying statutes. It’s a stealth mechanism for redefining infrastructure identity. Could this be used to obscure or reassign functions of facilities during emergencies? To create plausible deniability? “No, that’s not Site X—it’s the *Edwin P. Hubble Post Office*.”

And let’s not ignore the symbolism: an astronomer who proved the universe is expanding—now his name is being stamped onto a node in the federal communications network. Expansion. Connection. Observation.

Is this bill harmless? Maybe. But in the game of shadows, the smallest moves often hide the largest designs. Keep your eyes on the skies—and your mailbox.

*Stay woke, stay suspicious, and never trust a postmark.*

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

**Summary of S. 4052: The Edwin P. Hubble Post Office Designation Act**

**1. Main Purpose & Objectives** The primary purpose of S. 4052 is to honor the legacy of Edwin P. Hubble, the renowned American astronomer whose groundbreaking work expanded our understanding of the universe, by naming the United States Postal Service facility at 203 North Clay Street in Marshfield, Missouri—the town of his birth—the "Edwin P. Hubble Post Office." This bill serves a symbolic, patriotic objective: celebrating American scientific achievement and local pride. While it carries no substantive policy weight, its function is to reinforce national identity through the commemoration of historical figures—a ritual deeply embedded in congressional practice. The objective, frankly, is less about Hubble and more about giving senators a feel-good, non-controversial vote to tout back home: “I brought recognition to our hometown hero.” It’s governance as pageantry—harmless, heartwarming, and entirely performative.

**2. Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill contains two straightforward provisions: - **Section 1(a)** officially redesignates the Marshfield USPS facility as the “Edwin P. Hubble Post Office.” - **Section 1(b)** mandates that all federal references to the facility—legal documents, maps, regulations, etc.—must now use the new name. This is a pure naming bill with no regulatory, fiscal, or operational impact. It amends no existing law beyond updating official nomenclature. Think of it as a congressional Post-It note: low cost, zero controversy, high sentimental value. The only “change” is symbolic—though, in Washington, symbolism often *is* the substance.

**3. Affected Parties & Stakeholders** - **Primary Beneficiaries:** Residents of Marshfield, Missouri, particularly local historians, educators, and Hubble enthusiasts, who gain a tangible point of civic pride. - **U.S. Postal Service:** Must update signage, internal databases, and mailing materials—minor administrative work, absorbed into routine operations. - **Federal Agencies:** Required to reflect the name change in official records (per Section 1(b)), a trivial bureaucratic adjustment. - **Taxpayers:** Negligible impact; costs are minimal and likely covered under existing USPS budgets. - **Congressional Sponsors (Schmitt, Hawley, Paul):** Gain a low-effort, high-visibility win to showcase their commitment to “honoring American excellence”—a perfect reelection talking point.

**4. Potential Impact & Implications** - **Domestic Impact:** Minimal. The bill fosters local pride and educational awareness in Marshfield but alters no federal policy, funding, or service delivery. It may inspire school trips or small-town tourism—nothing more. - **Political Implications:** Exemplifies how Congress uses naming bills to bypass gridlock. While the nation debates immigration, inflation, and foreign policy, senators unite unanimously to name a post office—a bipartisan ritual that lets them claim productivity without solving hard problems. It’s Congress at its most functional: doing nothing important, but doing it together. - **Broader Significance:** Highlights the theater of legislating. In an era of polarization, such bills offer a rare moment of unanimity—proof that, when stakes are low, cooperation is easy. It’s not governance; it’s glad-handing with a postal stamp. And frankly? We’ll take it. At least nobody’s yelling.

In sum: S. 4052 is less a law, more a love letter to small-town America—signed, sealed, and delivered by the Senate. Freedom, elites, and the deep state? Not today. Today, it’s just about Hubble—and the quiet joy of a post office with a fancy new name.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

**Summary of S. 4052: The Edwin P. Hubble Post Office Designation Act**

**1. Main Purpose & Objectives** The sole purpose of S. 4052 is to rename a single United States Postal Service facility in Marshfield, Missouri—located at 203 North Clay Street—as the “Edwin P. Hubble Post Office.” This is not a policy reform, not a cost-saving measure, and certainly not a response to any pressing national crisis. It is, in essence, a ceremonial act of local pride dressed up as federal legislation. The objective? To honor Edwin P. Hubble, the famed astronomer who, despite being born in Marshfield, spent virtually none of his professional life there and is more commonly associated with institutions like Mount Wilson Observatory and the Hubble Space Telescope (which, ironically, bears his name already—so why not just look up?). The bill’s true goal appears to be giving two senators from Missouri a photo-op and a press release they can mail to constituents—preferably from the newly named post office.

**2. Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill contains two sections, both of which are about as substantive as a sugar pill: - **Section 1(a):** Mandates that the USPS facility at 203 North Clay Street shall henceforth be known as the “Edwin P. Hubble Post Office.” - **Section 1(b):** Requires that any reference to that facility in federal law, maps, regulations, or documents be deemed a reference to the new name.

That’s it. No funding, no operational changes, no oversight mechanisms. Just a linguistic decree from Congress declaring that a building’s signage must change. It’s the legislative equivalent of putting a new label on a jar of pickles and calling it innovation.

**3. Affected Parties & Stakeholders** - **Directly Affected:** The USPS employees and patrons of the Marshfield post office, who will now get to update their address labels, explain to confused relatives why their mail now comes from the “Hubble” office, and possibly endure awkward conversations about whether the astronomer ever sorted mail. - **Indirectly Affected:** Taxpayers, who fund the minutiae of this renaming—including new signage, updated federal records, and the staff time spent processing this nonsense instead of, say, addressing mail delivery delays or pension insolvency. - **Beneficiaries:** Senators Schmitt and Hawley, who get to claim they “delivered” for Missouri by naming a building after a guy who left town at 18; Edwin P. Hubble’s legacy, which now includes a postal annex in a town he barely knew; and the Hubble Space Telescope, which can now take solace in knowing its namesake shares honors with a building that likely doesn’t even have a telescope. - **Victims:** The English language, which must now absorb another redundant federal designation; historians, who must now clarify that Hubble’s greatest discoveries were made nowhere near Marshfield; and anyone who believes Congress should be fixing actual problems.

**4. Potential Impact & Implications** The practical impact is negligible. Mail will still arrive (or not, depending on USPS efficiency). The building’s function remains unchanged. The only tangible outcome is a minor bureaucratic update and a fleeting sense of civic pride for a handful of locals.

Symbolically, however, the bill is a perfect microcosm of congressional dysfunction: - It demonstrates how easily lawmakers prioritize performative gestures over substantive governance. - It reveals the absurdly low bar for what constitutes “legislative achievement” in an era of gridlock—naming a post office is apparently easier than passing a budget or reforming immigration. - It underscores the influence of local lobbying (likely from a historical society or chamber of commerce) in securing federal attention for trivial matters, while real issues languish. - It invites cynicism: if this is what passes for action, what does it say about the body’s capacity to address climate change, debt, or institutional decay?

In short, S. 4052 is not a law—it’s

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Summary of S. 4052: Edwin P. Hubble Post Office Designation Act**

**1. Main Purpose & Objectives** The primary purpose of S. 4052 is to honor the legacy of Edwin P. Hubble, the renowned American astronomer, by officially designating the United States Postal Service (USPS) facility located at 203 North Clay Street in Marshfield, Missouri, as the "Edwin P. Hubble Post Office." The bill seeks to recognize Hubble’s significant contributions to science—particularly his pivotal role in establishing the field of extragalactic astronomy and providing evidence for the expansion of the universe—by commemorating his ties to the local community. Marshfield, Missouri, is notable as Hubble’s birthplace, making this designation a meaningful tribute to his origins and enduring impact on astronomy and science education.

**2. Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill contains two core provisions: - **Section 1(a)**: Officially designates the USPS facility at 203 North Clay Street, Marshfield, Missouri, as the "Edwin P. Hubble Post Office." - **Section 1(b)**: Mandates that any reference to this facility in federal laws, maps, regulations, documents, or other official records shall be deemed a reference to the "Edwin P. Hubble Post Office," ensuring consistency across government usage.

The bill does not alter USPS operations, funding, or services; it is purely ceremonial and symbolic, affecting only the name of the facility in official contexts.

**3. Affected Parties & Stakeholders** - **United States Postal Service (USPS)**: Responsible for updating signage, internal records, and operational references to reflect the new name. - **Residents of Marshfield, Missouri**: Likely to experience increased local pride and potential boosts in heritage tourism or educational interest. - **Federal Agencies**: Must update maps, databases, and official documents to reflect the new designation. - **Public and Educators**: May benefit from heightened awareness of Hubble’s scientific legacy, particularly in STEM education contexts. - **Hubble’s Family and Scientific Community**: Likely to view the designation as a respectful acknowledgment of his contributions.

**4. Potential Impact & Implications** The bill carries minimal fiscal or administrative burden, as naming designations of this nature are routine and typically involve only minor costs for signage and record updates. Symbolically, it reinforces national recognition of scientific achievement and connects federal infrastructure to local history and STEM inspiration. While the change is largely ceremonial, it may foster community engagement and educational opportunities in Marshfield. There are no known controversies or opposition associated with the bill, which follows a long-standing congressional practice of naming postal facilities after notable individuals to honor public service, cultural figures, or scientific pioneers. The bill reflects bipartisan support, having been introduced by Senators Schmitt and Hawley and reported favorably by the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Schmitt, Eric [R-MO]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$158,400

23 donors

PACs

Organizations

$13,000

Committees

Individuals

$145,400

No PAC contributions found

ELEVATE MISSOURI

2 transactions

$6,700

TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA TRIBE

1 transaction

$2,900

PETER J SPALITTO DDS PC

1 transaction

$2,900

KIRKWOOD PLUMBING INC

1 transaction

$500

No committee contributions found

POPOLO, JOE

2 transactions

$13,200

WALTON, TROY

1 transaction

$11,600

PFAUTCH, ROY

1 transaction

$11,600

ROSS, DONALD

1 transaction

$10,000

TAYLOR, ANDREW

1 transaction

$6,600

TAYLOR, BARBARA

1 transaction

$6,600

KELSEY, J DAVID

1 transaction

$6,600

FOGEL, DAVID

1 transaction

$6,600

PALOMO, OSWALDO

1 transaction

$6,600

TAMASI, DAVID

1 transaction

$6,600

MCKNIGHT, ANDREW

1 transaction

$6,600

POPOLO, CHRIS

1 transaction

$6,600

ASHWORTH, CAROL

1 transaction

$6,600

ASHWORTH, JIMMY

1 transaction

$6,600

GIBBS, HALLIE H.

1 transaction

$6,600

GIDWITZ, RONALD J.

1 transaction

$6,600

STEWARD, DAVE

1 transaction

$6,600

MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE

1 transaction

$6,600

MANDELBLATT, ERIC

1 transaction

$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Hawley, Josh [R-MO]

ID: H001089

Top Contributors

R&W TOWING & RECOVERY

OrganizationST JOSEPH, MO

$3,300

Sep 18, 2024

SOUTHERN MISSOURI REAL ESTATE LLC

OrganizationAURORA, MO

$1,000

Jun 28, 2023

ST LOUIS CONSERVATIVE LEADERSHIP PAC

OrganizationCHESTERFIELD, MO

$914

Oct 31, 2024

MARK FAUGHN CONSTRUCTION LLC

OrganizationPOPLAR BLUFF, MO

$250

May 22, 2023

SCHELL, MARK CHRISTOPHER

DIAMOND PET FOOD • MANAGER

IndividualLOHMAN, MO

$13,200

Apr 13, 2023

CARR, GEORGE T.

THE DURHAM CO • MANAGEMENT

IndividualSPRINGFIELD, MO

$12,200

Apr 21, 2023

RUSSELL, DOUG MR.

DURHAM COMPANY • PRESIDENT

IndividualLEBANON, MO

$7,400

Apr 21, 2023

SHELTON, GREGORY P. MR.

SHELTON WHOLESALE • OWNER

IndividualEAGLEVILLE, MO

$6,600

Mar 11, 2024

WALDEN, MICHAEL

SHOOK HARDY BACON • ATTORNEY

IndividualMISSION HILLS, KS

$6,600

Mar 31, 2023

WILLARD, BRADLEY

WILLARD ASPHALT PAVING • PRESIDENT

IndividualLEBANON, MO

$6,600

Mar 31, 2023

Donor Network - Sen. Schmitt, Eric [R-MO]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 52 nodes and 52 connections

Total contributions: $52

Top Donors - Sen. Schmitt, Eric [R-MO]

Showing top 23 donors by contribution amount

4 Orgs19 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Executive Office of the President of the United States

Weak

Vector: 52%

Pages: 90-92AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill honors Edwin Hubble's astronomical legacy through a ceremonial postal designation, which loosely aligns with Project 2025's emphasis on space policy and scientific advancement, but does not implement or advance any specific space policy, regulatory reform, or R&D initiative outlined in the document."

Key themes:space sciencescientific recognitionastronomy

— 58 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise space policy reviews, legislative proposals, and regulatory reforms smoothly. The NSpC generally led on space issues within the EOP, but other White House offices also took on space topics. l As a member of the NSpC, and in coordination with other members, the Office of Science and Technology Policy developed a national space weather strategy, research and development (R&D) plans to mitigate the effects of orbital debris, and protocols for planetary protection to avoid biological contamination of celestial bodies. l The Council of Economic Advisers did research on the economic benefits of space property rights. l OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Reform updated and streamlined commercial launch licensing and commercial remote sensing satellite rules. During the Trump Administration, if a topic was purely military, such as stand- ing up the U.S. Space Command, the NSC took the lead. If a topic cut across military, civil, and commercial sectors, as was the case with cybersecurity in space, the NSpC and NSC would cochair the policy review groups. Trusted, collegial relationships across the White House complex are critical to successful space policy development, implementation, and oversight. Nowhere is this more important than in the relationship between the NSpC staff and OMB staff who oversee civil and national security–related space spending. Teamwork between the NSpC and OMB staff can communicate clear presidential priorities to departments and agencies, facilitating smooth development of the President’s budget request. The NSpC and OMB have many opportunities to collaborate in promoting presidential priorities while finding offsets in lower-priority programs and funding lines. OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY (OSTP) The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) was created by the National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976.33 Before its creation, Presidents received their advice and counsel on such matters through advisers and boards that had no statutory authority. The Director of OSTP is one of the few Senate-confirmed positions within the Executive Office of the President. Consistent with other laws, the President may delegate to the Director of OSTP directive authority over other elements of the executive branch. Other EOP policy officials and organizations such as the NSC and NEC are formally only advisory with relevant agency directives issued by the President. — 59 — Executive Office of the President of the United States The OSTP’s functions, as contained in the law, are to advise the President of scientific and technological considerations, evaluate the effectiveness of the federal effort, and generally lead and coordinate the federal government’s R&D programs. If science is being manipulated at the agencies to support separate political and institutional agendas, the President should increase the prominence of the OSTP’s Director either formally or informally. This would elevate the role of science in policy discussions and subsequent outcomes and theoretically help to balance out agencies like the Departments of Energy, State, and Commerce and the Envi- ronmental Protection Agency and Council on Environmental Quality. The OSTP can also help to bring technical expertise to regulatory matters in support of OMB. The OSTP should continue to play a lead role in coordinating federal R&D pro- grams. Recent legislation, especially the CHIPS and Science Act,34 has expanded federal policy and funding across the enterprise, and there is a need for more sig- nificant leadership in this area both to ensure effectiveness and to avoid duplication of effort. As befitting its location in the White House, the OSTP must be concerned with advancing national interests and not merely the parochial concerns of depart- ments, agencies, or parts of the scientific community. During the Trump and Biden Administrations, there has been a bipartisan focus on prioritizing R&D funding around the so-called Industries of the Future (IOTF). Under President Trump, IOTF priorities were artificial intelligence (AI), quantum information science (QIS), advanced communications/5G, advanced manufacturing, and biotechnology. Under President Biden, this list has been expanded to include advanced materials, robotics, battery technology, cybersecurity, green products and clean technology, plant genetics and agricultural technologies, nanotechnology, and semiconductor and microelectronics technologies. These priorities should be eval- uated and narrowed to ensure consistency with the next Administration’s priorities. Given a long list of priorities, coordinating efforts across agencies and mea- suring success are extremely challenging. The OSTP and OMB are required to work together on an annual basis to prioritize the funding requests and whatever Congress adds on top of them, but there continues to be concern about mission creep and funds expended on nonscientific R&D. The President should also issue an executive order to reshape the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) and related climate change research pro- grams. The USGCRP produces strategic plans and research (for example, the National Climate Assessment) that reduce the scope of legally proper options in presidential decision-making and in agency rulemakings and adjudications. Also, since much environmental policymaking must run the gauntlet of judicial review, USGCRP actions can frustrate successful litigation defense in ways that the career bureaucracy should not be permitted to control. The process for producing assess- ments should include diverse viewpoints. The OSTP and OMB should jointly assess the independence of the contractors used to conduct much of this outsourced

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Minimal

Vector: 53%

Pages: 425-427AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill is a ceremonial designation of a post office honoring astronomer Edwin P. Hubble, with no connection to Department of Energy R&D, technology transfer, national security, or scientific dominance objectives outlined in Project 2025."

Key themes:sciencetechnology

— 393 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions l Ensure that R&D funds are used for projects that protect and advance that edge. l Ensure that successful advances, with a focus on new natural resource development technologies, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and space, are transferred swiftly to American interests in the private sector. New Policies l Focus on benefits to Americans. OTT’s operations should be based on the recognition that the new technologies generated by American taxpayers’ investment in DOE are a significant national security asset rather than some neutral scientific gift to humanity. l Increase oversight and coordination. OTT needs to be vigilant in overseeing and coordinating OTT offices associated with each National Lab. For security and economic espionage reasons, the work funded by the American people needs to be protected, and when commercialized, it needs to go to American businesses. OFFICE OF SCIENCE (SC) Mission/Overview The Office of Science (SC) supports and oversees research facilities and pro- grams that cover basic science through its application to the demonstration and deployment of energy technologies. SC oversees 10 of the 17 DOE National Labs and 28 major federal research user facilities. Its mission is to preserve U.S. leader- ship in science, fund and perform basic research, and provide the scientific facilities that the private sector is unable or unwilling to provide. New initiatives include quantum information sciences and artificial intelligence. SC is led by a Senate-con- firmed Director at the Assistant Secretary level and has eight program offices.82 Needed Reforms The next conservative President should commit the United States to scientific dominance to support national and economic security, especially in light of similar efforts by China. To aid in this effort, the Office of Science should: l Return to its primary mission: nonpartisan and basic science. SC’s mission should be international leadership in basic and early applied science and provision of world-leading facilities for this work. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Inflation Reduction Act mark the major — 394 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise reorientation of DOE primarily from defense applications in the NNSA and basic and early applied science across SC and the applied offices to a massive federal research, development, demonstration, and commercialization body.83 Distraction from SC’s basic science mission should be prevented. l Increase the level of accountability. The National Laboratories need to be more directly accountable to the Secretary of Energy and Congress for their work and management. New Policies l Commit to U.S. science dominance. The United States is losing its dominance in scientific discoveries and technological development. China and other adversaries have been stealing American science and technology for years and are now on the verge of dominating science—a development that is fraught with negative strategic and economic implications for the United States. The next Administration must commit itself to ensuring that the U.S. continues to dominate scientific discovery and technological advancement. l Refocus on mission and eliminate duplication and waste. The Administration should work with Congress to rationalize the National Lab network to meet specific national objectives (such as the NNSA laboratories’ role in national defense) and conduct basic research that the private sector would not otherwise conduct. Activities that duplicate those of other government agencies or the private sector should be eliminated. l Properly manage the National Labs’ contributions to the private sector. SC should improve private-sector access to the National Labs, through programs like the GAIN voucher program and consistent with national security considerations, while ensuring that the economic benefits of taxpayer-funded technologies flow back to taxpayers through patent- review sharing or a revolving fund. Budget The Office of Science was appropriated slightly more than $7 billion in FY 2021, and DOE requested slightly less than $7.8 billion for FY 2023.84 OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (EM) Mission/Overview The Office of Environmental Management’s mission is to “complete the safe cleanup of [the] environmental legacy resulting from decades of nuclear

Department of Defense

Minimal

Vector: 52%

Pages: 149-151AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill is a ceremonial designation of a post office honoring astronomer Edwin P. Hubble, with no connection to defense policy, military readiness, space force reforms, or any of the specific objectives outlined in the Project 2025 Department of Defense or U.S. Space Force sections."

— 117 — Department of Defense 2. Create better incentives to retain talented junior NCOs, especially in infantry and other critical military occupational specialties. 3. Reduce unnecessary deployments to increase dwell time in order to enable more robust primary military education. l Align Navy amphibious shipbuilding with Force Design 2030. The U.S. Navy has struggled for decades to maintain an amphibious fleet that could support USMC war plans around large-scale amphibious operations. In addition, amphibious shipbuilding has often had to compete against other priorities within a constrained budget and limited shipbuilding capacity. 1. Develop and produce light amphibious warships (LAWs) to support more distributed amphibious operations, especially in the Pacific.34 2. Maintain between 28 and 31 larger amphibious warships as opposed to the 25 specified in current Navy shipbuilding plans and the 38 specified before 2020.35 U.S. SPACE FORCE U.S. space forces conduct global space operations to sustain and enhance air, land, and sea effectiveness, lethality, and superiority by providing secure broad- band global communications (precision position, navigation, and timing accuracy); attack warning and threat tracking and targeting capability (real-time intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance information); and their assured continuity of operations both by defending U.S. assets and by conducting offensive operations that are capable of imposing unacceptable losses on adversaries that might seek to attack them. The U.S. Space Force (USSF) was established to assure continuous global and theater combat support from space, to deter attacks against U.S. space assets, and to prevail in space should deterrence fail. The USSF posture was conceived as a balance of offensive and defensive deterrent capabilities designed for maximum effectiveness. Needed Reforms l Reverse the Biden Administration’s defensive posture. The Biden Administration has eliminated almost all offensive deterrence capabilities and instead will rely solely on defensive capabilities of disaggregation, maneuver, and reconstitution—the most costly, the slowest, and ultimately the most fragile architecture selection. — 118 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Reestablish offensive capabilities to guarantee a favorable balance of forces, efficiently manage the full deterrence spectrum, and seriously complicate enemy calculations of a successful first strike against U.S. space assets. 2. Restore architectural balance in U.S. space forces, both offensive and defensive, to restore deterrence dominance efficiently and quickly. 3. Rapidly expand space control capability, to include cis-lunar space (the region beginning at geosynchronous altitude and encompassing the moon), to provide early warning of an enemy attack. 4. Seek arms control and “rules of the road” understandings only when they are unambiguously in the interests of the U.S. and its allies, and prohibit their unilateral implementation. l Reduce overclassification. The USSF must move beyond the Cold War– era culture of secrecy and overclassification that surrounded military space to facilitate greater coordination and synchronization of efforts across the government and commercial sectors. Declassify appropriate information about terrestrial and on-orbit space capabilities that threaten the U.S. space constellation, as well as those being pursued by our competitors, to secure the principled right to counter them offensively. l Implement policies suited to a mature USSF. No longer a “newborn,” the USSF has entered its fourth year of existence, and the lessons learned can be incorporated across all facets of the force to increase its effectiveness. 1. Restructure from the current “unity of effort” structure to “unity of command.” 2. Lead the U.S. government’s development of a clear and unambiguous declaratory policy that the United States will operate at will in space and enforce these operations with capabilities that ensure effective deterrence and the ability to impose our will if necessary. 3. End the current study phase of concept development and issue necessary guidance for the development and fielding of offensive capabilities.

Department of Commerce

Minimal

Vector: 52%

Pages: 717-719AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill is a ceremonial designation of a post office honoring astronomer Edwin P. Hubble, with no connection to the Department of Commerce, minority business development, intellectual property policy, or NIST reforms outlined in Project 2025. The policy focuses on economic innovation, IP protection, and federal program restructuring, none of which are addressed by the bill."

— 685 — Department of Commerce l Establishing MBDA as a data and research clearinghouse for minority business enterprises and policymakers; l Coordinating amongst Cabinet agencies, state and local government, and trade associations to best leverage resources and encourage growth and innovation; and l Evaluating the harmful effects of unfair trade practices on minority-owned businesses and their employees. U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office carries out a core constitutional man- date from Section 8, Article 1: “The Congress shall have Power...[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discover- ies.” Strong intellectual property (IP) protections form the bedrock of American business and are a key factor in making the U.S. economy the most innovative in the world. As such, a conservative Administration must constantly work to strengthen IP rights and combat the incorrect view that strong IP rights some- how limit innovation. Political leadership in a new conservative Administration should: l Support like-minded countries as candidates for leadership in the World Intellectual Property Organization and build strong relationships with international partners to strengthen intellectual property rights. l Re-examine patent eligibility requirements in Section 101 of the Patent Act7 and support internal and/or legislative reforms to enable U.S. leadership in critical and emerging technologies such as quantum computing, 5G, and artificial intelligence. l Take a balanced approach to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and prioritize rapid and transparent processing of applications and appeals. l Work with Administration partners and Congress to find and punish trademark infringers and counterfeiters. l Oppose efforts to provide intellectual property waivers for cutting-edge technologies, including for COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics, through the World Trade Organization’s Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights agreement or any other mechanism. — 686 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY The National Institute of Standards and Technology is charged with promoting U.S. innovation and competitiveness by “advancing measurement science, standards, and technology.”8 NIST carries out cutting edge research, helps industry establish standards and best practices, and is the nation’s foremost authority on measurements. NIST’s atomic clock, for instance, maintains the official time of the United States. An incoming Administration should evaluate the federal government’s civilian research footprint and consolidate those functions while ensuring that any research conducted with taxpayer dollars serves the national interest in a concrete way in line with conservative principles. Beyond this, an incoming Administration should: l Privatize the Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership. The Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) establishes and manages a network of centers focused on advising small- and medium-sized manufacturers in order to improve processes and thereby strengthen the U.S. industrial base. When Congress created the program, MEP centers were intended to transition to self-sustaining private institutions after using government funds to begin operations, but the prohibition on long-term funding was abolished in 1998. MEP’s business advisory services would be more properly carried out by the private sector. The next Administration should propose legislation to zero out this $150 million program and fully privatize existing MEP centers. l Transfer the Baldridge Performance Excellence Program. This program’s “process” assists companies in improving management and operations, a function more properly and effectively carried out by the private sector. This program operates at a cost to taxpayers, despite thousands of dollars in fees charged to each participating company or entity and long-term plans to make the program self-sufficient. Maintenance and operation of the program should be entirely handed over to the Baldridge Award Foundation to be run by non-government staff via fees. l Increase value to taxpayers. NIST should reinvigorate the Technology Transfer and ROI (return on investment) initiatives begun under the Trump Administration. These initiatives help speed the process of commercializing science funded by the federal government. l Reestablish U.S. dominance in international standards. NIST should explore ways to incentivize broader U.S. participation in standards-setting bodies and the exclusion of participants from adversaries like China. Standards are set to facilitate trade in countries that utilize those standards: Countries

Department of Defense

Minimal

Vector: 50%

Pages: 152-154AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill is a ceremonial designation of a post office honoring astronomer Edwin P. Hubble, with no connection to defense policy, space operations, cybersecurity, or any of the specific Department of Defense or USCYBERCOM reforms outlined in Project 2025."

— 119 — Department of Defense 4. Alter the Space Development Agency’s current “fail-early” approach and transition to a methodology that maintains aggressive timelines but with significantly greater engineering rigor, with special attention to sustainment, support, and fully integrated space operations. 5. Increase the number of general officer positions to ensure the Space Force’s ability to compete for resources on a common basis with the other services. 6. Explore creation of a Space Force Academy to attract top aero–astro students, engineers, and scientists and develop astronauts. The academy could be attached initially to a large existing research university like the California Institute of Technology or MIT, share faculty and funding, and eventually be built separately to be on par with the other service academies. U.S. CYBER COMMAND USCYBERCOM was established in 2010 by the Department of Defense to unify the direction of cyberspace operations, strengthen DOD cyberspace capabilities, and integrate and enhance U.S. cyber expertise. Cyber capabilities and threats are evolving rapidly. Accordingly, a conservative Administration should be especially sensitive to and prepared to meet the challenges presented by bureaucratic silos, inappropriately rigid tactical doctrine, and strategic thinking’s historic tendency to lag behind technological capability. The preliminary evidence from the war in Ukraine suggests that existing cyber doctrine and certain capability and target assumptions may be incorrect or mis- placed. The following recommendations therefore presuppose that there will be a rigorous “lessons learned” analysis and review of existing U.S. doctrine in light of the battlefield evidence. Needed Reforms l Ensure that USCYBERCOM is properly focused. Mission creep is leading to wasteful overlap with the Department of Homeland Security, National Security Agency, Department of Defense, and Central Intelligence Agency. 1. Separate USCYBERCOM from the National Security Agency per congressional direction. 2. Conduct effective offensive cyber-effects operations at the tactical and strategic levels. — 120 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Expand defensive cyber-effects operations authorized by President Trump's classified National Security Presidential Memorandum 13, “United States Cyber Operations Policy.”36 4. End USCYBERCOM’s participation in federal efforts to “fortify” U.S. elections to eliminate the perception that DOD is engaging in partisan politics. l Increase USCYBERCOM’s effectiveness. 1. Accelerate the integration of cyber and electronic warfare (EW) doctrine and capabilities, abiding by the time-tested norms of combined-arms warfare. 2. Mandate that development teams will include both coders and soldiers, aircrew, and sailors with kinetic experience at the platoon level. 3. Break the paradigm of cyber authorities held at the strategic level. 4. Increase cyber resilience by, for example, protecting the Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications Network and the Air Force’s Cyber Resiliency Office for Weapons Systems (CROWS). 5. Expand coordination of joint operations with allies. 6. Implement the Government Accountability Office’s recommendation that the DOD Chief Information Officer, Commander of USCYBERCOM, and Commander of Joint Force Headquarters–DOD Information Network “align policy and system requirements to enable DOD to have enterprise-wide visibility of cyber incident reporting to support tactical, strategic, and military strategies for response.”37 l Rationalize strategy and doctrine. 1. Update the October 2022 National Security Strategy to define DOD roles and responsibilities beyond existing platitudes. 2. Apply traditional deterrence strategies and principles for using cyber/ EW in retaliation for foreign cyberattacks and/or EW actions against U.S. infrastructure and citizens.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Schmitt, Eric

TICKET Act

119/s/281

Gateway Partnership Act

119/s/2767

National Plan for Epilepsy Act

119/s/494

Back to All Bills

A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 203 North Clay Street in Marshfield, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the "Edwin P. Hubble Post Office".