U.S. Tech PATH Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/s/4570
Last Updated: June 17, 2026

Sponsored by

Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

ID: S001181

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

June 16, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

πŸ“ Current Status

Next: The full Senate will vote on whether to pass the bill.

βœ…

Passed Senate

πŸ›οΈ

House Review

πŸŽ‰

Passed Congress

πŸ–ŠοΈ

Presidential Action

βš–οΈ

Became Law

πŸ“š How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the U.S. Congress. The "U.S. Tech PATH Act" - because who doesn't love a good acronym? Let's dissect this farce and uncover the real disease beneath the symptoms.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill claims to incentivize foreign governments to buy American-made cyber and digital technologies, because apparently, they're not already doing so voluntarily. The stated goal is to "streamline" procurement processes, which is code for "make it easier for U.S. companies to sell their wares abroad." How noble.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes a new program within the Department of State, because what's a few more bureaucrats between friends? This program will supposedly help foreign governments navigate regulatory hurdles and provide "strategic direction" - read: sales pitches - from the U.S. government. Oh, and it'll also facilitate long-term engagement with foreign partners throughout the procurement cycle, which is just a fancy way of saying "we'll keep selling them stuff as long as they're willing to buy."

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved: U.S. tech companies looking to expand their customer base, foreign governments seeking to upgrade their cyber and digital capabilities, and the U.S. government trying to maintain its grip on global technological dominance. And, of course, the obligatory mentions of "national security" and "cybersecurity" to justify the whole charade.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "follow the money." The real motivation behind this legislation is to boost U.S. tech exports and line the pockets of American companies. Don't be fooled by the rhetoric about "trusted cyber and digital technologies" - it's all about selling more widgets to foreign governments. The potential impact? More U.S. jobs, perhaps, but also increased dependence on American technology for foreign governments, which could lead to... you guessed it... more cybersecurity risks. But hey, who needs security when there are profits to be made?

In conclusion, the "U.S. Tech PATH Act" is a quintessential example of legislative doublespeak, where the stated goals and objectives are mere window dressing for the real agenda: corporate welfare and geopolitical posturing. It's a disease, really - a chronic case of crony capitalism, with symptoms including corruption, greed, and a healthy dose of hypocrisy. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this farce unfold. Next patient, please!

Related Topics

Defense Spending & Procurement Trade & International Commerce Research & Innovation Policy
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

πŸ’° Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

Congress 119 β€’ 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$72,850
13 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$250
Committees
$0
Individuals
$72,600

No PAC contributions found

1
TILT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE LLC
1 transaction
$250

No committee contributions found

1
HAWASH, NOUR
4 transactions
$19,800
2
HAWASH, SAFA
2 transactions
$6,600
3
KANDIL, MARIAM
2 transactions
$6,600
4
SHAH, JAWAD
2 transactions
$6,600
5
SIMMONS, IAN
2 transactions
$6,600
6
SOLTAN, BOSHRA
2 transactions
$6,600
7
JONDY, JENAN
1 transaction
$3,300
8
KANDIL, OSAMA
1 transaction
$3,300
9
WU, ALBERT
1 transaction
$3,300
10
MORIN, THOMAS
1 transaction
$3,300
11
CROWLEY, MATTHEW
1 transaction
$3,300
12
HUNT, SWANEE
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Ricketts, Pete [R-NE]

ID: R000618

Top Contributors

10

1
SPIKE OCOTILLO LLC
Organization CHANDLER, AZ
$2,500
Mar 4, 2024
2
HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP
Organization RICHMOND, VA
$1,000
Mar 28, 2024
3
KING & SPALDING LLP
Organization ATLANTA, GA
$1,000
Mar 29, 2024
4
GREENBERG TRAURIG
Organization ALBANY, NY
$1,000
Apr 23, 2024
5
H.A. TRUE, III
Organization CASPER, WY
$1,000
Aug 22, 2024
6
DELTA AIRLINES
Organization ATLANTA, GA
$234
Apr 17, 2023
7
VANDERSLOOT, BELINDA
SELF β€’ HOMEMAKER
Individual IDAHO FALLS, ID
$6,600
Mar 4, 2024
8
VANDERSLOOT, FRANK
MELALEUCA β€’ OWNER
Individual IDAHO FALLS, ID
$6,600
Mar 4, 2024
9
MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE
RETIRED
Individual ASPEN, CO
$6,600
Jun 7, 2024
10
MANDELBLATT, ERIC
SOROBAN CAPITAL PARTNERS LP β€’ MANAGING PARTNER
Individual ASPEN, CO
$6,600
Jun 7, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 18 nodes and 24 connections

Total contributions: $77,350

Top Donors - Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

Showing top 13 donors by contribution amount

1 Org12 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped.

  • +Cybersecurity confidence 0.80

    Section 4(c) prioritizes cybersecurity products, including firewalls and intrusion detection systems, which suggests the bill supports the cybersecurity industry.

  • Section 4(c)(5) mentions equipment to enable the adoption of artificial intelligence solutions, which suggests the bill supports the AI and cloud infrastructure industry.

  • Section 4(c)(2) includes hardware such as processors, which are a key component of semiconductors, indicating support for the semiconductors and hardware industry.

  • +Telecommunications confidence 0.70

    Section 4(c)(4) includes telecommunications equipment such as subsea fiber-optic cable, indicating support for the telecommunications industry.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]) received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β€” they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Related Bills