Further Additional Continuing Appropriations and Other Extensions Act, 2025

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/924

Last Updated: March 10, 2026

Further Additional Continuing Appropriations and Other Extensions Act, 2025

S. 924, 119th Congress — read as touching Defense Contractors.

The sponsor

Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$83,550 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Defense" section, p. 128-130 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 25.

March 10, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The Further Additional Continuing Appropriations and Other Extensions Act, 2025 (S. 924). A pedestrian exercise in bureaucratic largesse, no doubt crafted by the uninspired minds that populate our nation's capital.

Let us dissect this behemoth of a bill, shall we?

**Total Funding Amounts and Budget Allocations:** The bill appropriates a staggering $750 million for the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Disaster Relief Fund, a 10% increase from last year's allocation. Additionally, it sets aside $1.65 billion for various health programs, including community health centers, national health service corps, and teaching health centers.

**Key Programs and Agencies Receiving Funds:** The Department of Defense is the primary beneficiary, with $3.34 billion allocated for shipbuilding and conversion programs, a 5% increase from last year's appropriation. The Navy's Columbia Class Submarine program receives a significant boost, with an additional $236 million in funding.

**Notable Increases or Decreases:** The bill includes a notable decrease in funding for the Office of Navajo and Hopi Relocation, with only $1.65 million allocated, down from last year's $3.2 million. Conversely, the FEMA Disaster Relief Fund sees a substantial increase, likely due to the growing frequency and severity of natural disasters.

**Riders or Policy Provisions Attached to Funding:** Section 172 includes a provision designating the additional FEMA funding as an "emergency requirement," allowing for expedited disbursement without congressional oversight. This is a clever move, as it enables the administration to bypass traditional budgetary constraints.

**Fiscal Impact and Deficit Implications:** This bill will undoubtedly contribute to our nation's burgeoning deficit, currently projected to exceed $1 trillion in 2025. The increased funding for defense programs and FEMA will only exacerbate this issue, placing additional pressure on future generations to foot the bill.

In conclusion, S. 924 is a quintessential example of Washington's spendthrift culture, where special interests and bureaucratic inertia dictate fiscal policy. As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I must emphasize that true innovation and progress can only be achieved through the unencumbered free market, not through the clumsy machinations of government.

Projected impact on my business empire: +$500 million in increased defense contracts; -$200 million in reduced opportunities for privatization due to FEMA's expanded role. Net gain: $300 million.

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$511,128

381 donors

PACs

Organizations

$33,300

Committees

Individuals

$477,828

No PAC contributions found

LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE

2 transactions

$6,600

SAN PABLO LYTTON TRIBE

2 transactions

$6,600

PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS

3 transactions

$5,800

THE CHICKASAW NATION

1 transaction

$3,300

AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY

1 transaction

$2,500

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

2 transactions

$2,000

SISSETON-WAHPETON OYATE

1 transaction

$2,000

YAKAMA NATION

1 transaction

$2,000

SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE

1 transaction

$1,500

SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE

1 transaction

$1,000

No committee contributions found

ARNOLD, JOHN

2 transactions

$6,600

ARNOLD, LAURA

2 transactions

$6,600

BALLMER, CONNIE

2 transactions

$6,600

BROTMAN, SUSAN

3 transactions

$6,600

MICHAELS, LAURIE F.

2 transactions

$6,600

SILBEY, ALEXANDER

3 transactions

$6,600

ZECH, MARCIA W.

3 transactions

$5,500

CLARKSON, LLAYRON JR

2 transactions

$5,000

GRINSTEIN, CAROLYN H

2 transactions

$5,000

GRUENFELD, CHRISTOPHER

2 transactions

$5,000

JEFFERS, ROBERT

2 transactions

$5,000

KISTLER, WILLIAM

3 transactions

$5,000

LEVIN, DEBORAH

2 transactions

$5,000

MARTIN, LYLE C

2 transactions

$5,000

ORLADY, DAVID

2 transactions

$5,000

SHARAN, NITESH

2 transactions

$5,000

THOMPSON, MARY

2 transactions

$5,000

TSAI, TENNY

2 transactions

$5,000

VAN AMERONGEN, DEREK

2 transactions

$5,000

VIDINSKY, JOANNE

2 transactions

$5,000

VULICH, SARAH

2 transactions

$5,000

SILL, MARCIA JOSLYN

3 transactions

$4,500

SMITH, NANCY F.

3 transactions

$4,300

BYERS, MARGARET R

4 transactions

$4,000

CAREY, JAMES

3 transactions

$3,900

BENOLIEL, JOEL

2 transactions

$3,300

BUKOWSKY, BRANT

1 transaction

$3,300

BUKOWSKY, BROCK

1 transaction

$3,300

FROBOUCK, STEPHEN

1 transaction

$3,300

GOODCHILD, FIONA

3 transactions

$3,300

HOLLOWAY, SAMANTHA B

1 transaction

$3,300

SEUBERT, RON

1 transaction

$3,300

BRINDLE, ALEC JR

2 transactions

$3,300

LEDORZE, JULIET

1 transaction

$3,000

MCIVER, SANDRA

4 transactions

$3,000

GOODWIN, ADAM

3 transactions

$3,000

COCHRAN, DARRELL

1 transaction

$2,700

BRIDGE, JONATHAN J

1 transaction

$2,500

CATZ, SAFRA

1 transaction

$2,500

CHAVERN, DAVID

1 transaction

$2,500

COWLEY, DEBORAH

1 transaction

$2,500

DASCHLE, NATHAN

1 transaction

$2,500

ERICSEN, EMILY

1 transaction

$2,500

FENWICK, THOMAS

1 transaction

$2,500

FOSTER, JEFFREY

1 transaction

$2,500

HANSON, JON L

3 transactions

$2,500

KINSELLA, JIM

1 transaction

$2,500

MCLERRAN, LARRY

1 transaction

$2,500

MCNEAL, BOB

1 transaction

$2,500

MOULTON, SUSAN

1 transaction

$2,500

ROBINSON, JAMIE

1 transaction

$2,500

SHAW, GREGORY L

3 transactions

$2,500

SINEGAL, JIM

1 transaction

$2,500

TOMOZAWA, PETER

3 transactions

$2,500

COCHRAN, DARRELL L

1 transaction

$2,400

MELLOTT, JANE

1 transaction

$2,400

LOSCHEN, MATTHEW GUY

1 transaction

$2,300

VRADENBURG, GEORGE III

1 transaction

$2,100

BENNETT, ROB

1 transaction

$2,000

BLEECK, JOERG

1 transaction

$2,000

BLOCH, WILL

1 transaction

$2,000

BRADDOCK, DENNIS J

1 transaction

$2,000

CUNNINGHAM, NELSON

1 transaction

$2,000

MCCALLUM, NANCY

2 transactions

$2,000

PERREAULT, MARK

1 transaction

$2,000

POPE, CHERYL L.

2 transactions

$2,000

ROBERTS, ELIZABETH

1 transaction

$2,000

TISCH, ANN RUBENSTEIN

1 transaction

$2,000

VODRA, WILLIAM

1 transaction

$2,000

BREHM, PETER

2 transactions

$2,000

QUINN, ANDY

3 transactions

$1,638

ARMSTRONG, TONY

3 transactions

$1,500

BRIGHT, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,500

FOWLER, WYMAN B

1 transaction

$1,500

HAYS, GAYLEEN

3 transactions

$1,500

LARSEN, DINAH

1 transaction

$1,500

MARKLEY, GREG B

1 transaction

$1,500

PETERSON, MICHAEL A

1 transaction

$1,500

RICHARD, LOUIS P

2 transactions

$1,500

RICHARD, LOUIS P.

2 transactions

$1,500

THOMPSON, TIM C.

1 transaction

$1,500

VENNERI, PAOLO

1 transaction

$1,500

OSBORNE, DEB

1 transaction

$1,200

ANDERS, GRETCHEN

2 transactions

$1,040

ARCANGELI, MADISON

1 transaction

$1,000

BAGLEY, CHARLES

1 transaction

$1,000

BAGLEY, NANCY

1 transaction

$1,000

BARTON, ELIZABETH

2 transactions

$1,000

BELL, CAROL

1 transaction

$1,000

BLUME, JOHN K

1 transaction

$1,000

BORDNER, DONALD

1 transaction

$1,000

BOYLE, DEBRA

1 transaction

$1,000

BRIDGE, BOBBE

1 transaction

$1,000

BROYDRICK, WILLIAM B.

1 transaction

$1,000

BULLITT, DOROTHY C

1 transaction

$1,000

CALLAHAN, PAT

1 transaction

$1,000

CARTER, DONALD

2 transactions

$1,000

CASSADAY, EMILY

2 transactions

$1,000

CHARBONNEAU, CHRIS

1 transaction

$1,000

100

COLLIER, DIANE

2 transactions

$1,000

101

COOK, CHRISTOPHER

1 transaction

$1,000

102

CRITZ, FRANK

1 transaction

$1,000

103

DAUGHERTY, WILL

1 transaction

$1,000

104

DE JONG, KARL

1 transaction

$1,000

105

DEWEERDT, ZONA

1 transaction

$1,000

106

DICKS, NORM

1 transaction

$1,000

107

DIRESTA, NICOLE

1 transaction

$1,000

108

EARL, CHARLES

1 transaction

$1,000

109

EIEL, RICHARD

1 transaction

$1,000

110

FEICHTMEIR, PETER

1 transaction

$1,000

111

FIFE, MENDA

1 transaction

$1,000

112

FLANNIGAN, DENNIS

1 transaction

$1,000

113

FLECKNER, KAREN M.

1 transaction

$1,000

114

FLEISCHMANN, ANTHONY

1 transaction

$1,000

115

FRANK, JOHN E

1 transaction

$1,000

116

GARTH, GRETCHEN

1 transaction

$1,000

117

GATES, MIMI

1 transaction

$1,000

118

GATES, REBECCA

1 transaction

$1,000

119

GORDON, CAROL S.

2 transactions

$1,000

120

GREER, BRIAN

1 transaction

$1,000

121

GUDELSKY, MEDDA

1 transaction

$1,000

122

GULLICK, NANCY

1 transaction

$1,000

123

HALLAHAN, KATE

1 transaction

$1,000

124

HARMON, JACK

2 transactions

$1,000

125

HOFMANN, KARL

1 transaction

$1,000

126

HOSTETLER, DAVID D.

2 transactions

$1,000

127

ISAKI, LUCY P.

1 transaction

$1,000

128

KERR, CLARK

1 transaction

$1,000

129

KIMBALL, ANN MARIE MD

1 transaction

$1,000

130

KNUTZEN, DAVID

1 transaction

$1,000

131

KOONS, CHRISTINA

1 transaction

$1,000

132

KOPP, TERI

1 transaction

$1,000

133

KUHN, HANNAH M. M.

2 transactions

$1,000

134

KWIRAM, ALVIN

1 transaction

$1,000

135

LEAVER, CAROLYN

1 transaction

$1,000

136

LERT, RANDALL P.

1 transaction

$1,000

137

LEVY, SUSAN J.

1 transaction

$1,000

138

LITWACK, DAVID

1 transaction

$1,000

139

LONERS, BARBARA B.

2 transactions

$1,000

140

LOSCHEN, MATTHEW

1 transaction

$1,000

141

MALLOVE, ZACHARY

1 transaction

$1,000

142

MARTIN, BEVERLY M.

2 transactions

$1,000

143

MCCAUSLAND, JENNIFER

2 transactions

$1,000

144

MCKAY, NAN

1 transaction

$1,000

145

MCKELVEY, HARRIET

1 transaction

$1,000

146

MEHRKAM, NOAH B

1 transaction

$1,000

147

MIODUSKI, MARK

1 transaction

$1,000

148

MORGRIDGE, BARBARA G

2 transactions

$1,000

149

NEWMAN SILS, VALERIE

1 transaction

$1,000

150

NICKERSON, MARTIN

1 transaction

$1,000

151

NIYANGODA, DULAR

1 transaction

$1,000

152

O'NEILL, MAURA

1 transaction

$1,000

153

ONEILL, MAURA

1 transaction

$1,000

154

OVERTURF, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,000

155

PARVIN, JEANNE L.

1 transaction

$1,000

156

PEROT, MARGOT

1 transaction

$1,000

157

PERRICH, DOROTHY M

2 transactions

$1,000

158

PINNELLI, JANIS W.

1 transaction

$1,000

159

PROCTOR, GREGORY

1 transaction

$1,000

160

PRUZAN, LUCIA S

1 transaction

$1,000

161

QUACKENBUSH, MICHELLE

1 transaction

$1,000

162

REVELLE, TERESA

1 transaction

$1,000

163

RICKERT, ALLEN

1 transaction

$1,000

164

ROBERTSON, WILLIAM G

1 transaction

$1,000

165

RUBIN, JOEL

1 transaction

$1,000

166

RUBIN, JUSTIN

2 transactions

$1,000

167

RUDD, ANNA D.

1 transaction

$1,000

168

SCHEER, GARY

1 transaction

$1,000

169

SCHROY, GREG

1 transaction

$1,000

170

SHAPIRO, FREDERICKA F.

1 transaction

$1,000

171

SILBEY, NEELY

2 transactions

$1,000

172

SNAPP, KRISTIN

1 transaction

$1,000

173

SOLIEN, STEPHANIE M.

1 transaction

$1,000

174

SPADARO, JASON

1 transaction

$1,000

175

SQUIRE, RICHARD

1 transaction

$1,000

176

STARR, BARBARA S.

2 transactions

$1,000

177

STROUM, CYNTHIA

1 transaction

$1,000

178

TEKAVEC, DEBRA

1 transaction

$1,000

179

TINER, MARK

1 transaction

$1,000

180

VADAPALLI, ANAND

1 transaction

$1,000

181

VAN BUREN, WILLIAM S

1 transaction

$1,000

182

WEBSTER, TODD

1 transaction

$1,000

183

WHITLEY, BEVERLY

2 transactions

$1,000

184

WRIGHT, CAROLE

2 transactions

$1,000

185

YOUNG, JIM

1 transaction

$1,000

186

ZEH, JUDITH E.

1 transaction

$1,000

187

DICKS, DONALD

2 transactions

$1,000

188

ZAHLER, RICHARD

2 transactions

$1,000

189

VANDERLUGT, PETER

1 transaction

$900

190

BROWN, ADRIANE

1 transaction

$750

191

DE SAM LAZARO, RICHARD

1 transaction

$750

192

RIDDLE, KAREN

1 transaction

$700

193

ADLER, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$600

194

MCKINNEY-PECKINPAUGH, PAM

1 transaction

$600

195

ABEYTA, CORNELIUS

1 transaction

$500

196

AEBIG, SHEENA

1 transaction

$500

197

ALEXANDER, PATRICIA

1 transaction

$500

198

ALHADEFF, DINA

1 transaction

$500

199

ALLEN, JENNIFER

1 transaction

$500

200

ANDERSON, CAROL

1 transaction

$500

201

APLIN, LIZ

1 transaction

$500

202

ARMSTRONG, SETH REP.

1 transaction

$500

203

AUGUSTA, BARBARA ANN

1 transaction

$500

204

BAIRD, KURT

1 transaction

$500

205

BARTHELMESS, JAMES

1 transaction

$500

206

BEALS, NANCY L

1 transaction

$500

207

BEATY, DON

1 transaction

$500

208

BELL, BRUCE

1 transaction

$500

209

BERGREEN, TIMOTHY

1 transaction

$500

210

BEYER-MEARS, ANNETTE

1 transaction

$500

211

BOGARD, REBECCA L

1 transaction

$500

212

BOSWELL, BRAD

1 transaction

$500

213

BRASHEM, MARTIN

1 transaction

$500

214

BREESE, EMILY

1 transaction

$500

215

BRIDGES, ELAINE

1 transaction

$500

216

BRUNO, MARILYN

1 transaction

$500

217

BRYSON, KEITHA

1 transaction

$500

218

BUCHHOLZ, BEN

1 transaction

$500

219

BURKE, CHRIS

1 transaction

$500

220

BYERS, BRECK

1 transaction

$500

221

CAMPBELL, HAROLD

1 transaction

$500

222

CAMPBELL, THOMAS

1 transaction

$500

223

CHANG, FLORENCE S

1 transaction

$500

224

CLUBB, MEGAN

1 transaction

$500

225

COHEN, SAL

1 transaction

$500

226

COPELAND, PAMELA

1 transaction

$500

227

CRUZ, CAROL PITZEL

1 transaction

$500

228

CULPEPPER, JANICE A.

1 transaction

$500

229

CZINGER, KEVIN

1 transaction

$500

230

DEEDER, JOHN

1 transaction

$500

231

DERR, CRAIG

1 transaction

$500

232

DESIMONE, RICHARD L

1 transaction

$500

233

DIAZ, JOHN

1 transaction

$500

234

DICKS, J DONALD

1 transaction

$500

235

DIVINE, JENNIFER

1 transaction

$500

236

DOBSON, ANDREA

1 transaction

$500

237

DONOHUE, DWYLA

1 transaction

$500

238

DUNN, BARBARA

1 transaction

$500

239

EGGERTSEN, BEN

1 transaction

$500

240

ELTRICH, KATE

1 transaction

$500

241

ENSOR, DAVID

1 transaction

$500

242

FLANAGAN, LUCILE

1 transaction

$500

243

FOLSOM, CAROLE

1 transaction

$500

244

FOND, MIRIAM

1 transaction

$500

245

FRANCE, LAUREEN

1 transaction

$500

246

FRASIER, GRETCHEN G

1 transaction

$500

247

FRASIER, GRETCHEN G.

1 transaction

$500

248

FUGERE, JOE

1 transaction

$500

249

GALANTI, VICTORIA S.

1 transaction

$500

250

GENCARELLI, DAVID

1 transaction

$500

251

GIBRON, REBECCA

1 transaction

$500

252

GLICKMAN, DANIEL R.

1 transaction

$500

253

GOH, OLIVE

1 transaction

$500

254

GOWN, CAROL J.

1 transaction

$500

255

GRIFFIN, MATT

1 transaction

$500

256

GRUDIN, DANIEL F

1 transaction

$500

257

GUDGEL, DAVID

1 transaction

$500

258

GUSTITIS, LILLIAN S

1 transaction

$500

259

HANDSFIELD, H. HUNTER

1 transaction

$500

260

HARDWICK, DEREK

1 transaction

$500

261

HARTMANN, JUDITH L.

1 transaction

$500

262

HAYES, FRANCES

1 transaction

$500

263

HELDE, KATHRYN

1 transaction

$500

264

HEWITT, JUDITH

1 transaction

$500

265

HIGGINS, LESLEY

1 transaction

$500

266

HILL, PATTI

1 transaction

$500

267

HOLZ, CLEO

1 transaction

$500

268

HOSLEY, THERESA PAN

1 transaction

$500

269

HUDSON, RICHARD B

1 transaction

$500

270

HUGHES, VALERIE

1 transaction

$500

271

INVEEN, LAURA

1 transaction

$500

272

JOHNSON, THEODORE C

1 transaction

$500

273

JONES, DAVE

1 transaction

$500

274

JUSTIN, JIM

1 transaction

$500

275

KELLY, MICHAEL JOSEPH

1 transaction

$500

276

KIL, JONATHAN

1 transaction

$500

277

KIM, THEODORE

1 transaction

$500

278

KLEIN, BENJAMIN

1 transaction

$500

279

KUHN, HANNAH M.

1 transaction

$500

280

LAMP, CHARLOTTE

1 transaction

$500

281

LANGE, RANDALL W

1 transaction

$500

282

LARSEN, JOHNINE L

1 transaction

$500

283

LAZOWSKA, ED D

1 transaction

$500

284

LEONARD, DANIEL J

1 transaction

$500

285

LEVINGER, JANET

1 transaction

$500

286

LLOYD-JONES, JEAN

1 transaction

$500

287

LOE, GERI L

1 transaction

$500

288

LUND, BERNEDINE M.

1 transaction

$500

289

LYONS, TOM

1 transaction

$500

290

MACS, JURIS

1 transaction

$500

291

MANAGEMENT, ACR

1 transaction

$500

292

MARQUARDT, JUD R

1 transaction

$500

293

MARTIN, BEVERLY M

1 transaction

$500

294

MARTIN, KENNETH

1 transaction

$500

295

MAXWELL, BRYAN

1 transaction

$500

296

MAY, FELICIA

1 transaction

$500

297

MAYER, VIRGINIA

1 transaction

$500

298

MCALPINE, JEAN

1 transaction

$500

299

MCBRIDE, STEVEN

1 transaction

$500

300

MCGLYNN, SEAN

1 transaction

$500

301

MCINTURFF, PATRICIA

1 transaction

$500

302

MCINTYRE, BRUCE

1 transaction

$500

303

MCKNIGHT, DONALD

1 transaction

$500

304

MILLAR, ROGER

1 transaction

$500

305

MILLER, BARBARA A

1 transaction

$500

306

MOORE, JULIE

1 transaction

$500

307

NONNEMAN, ELAINE M

1 transaction

$500

308

OBERBILLIG, MOLLY

1 transaction

$500

309

OLSEN, LYNN

1 transaction

$500

310

OLSON, LEE

1 transaction

$500

311

ORIANS, GORDON

1 transaction

$500

312

OTOROWSKI, CHRIS

1 transaction

$500

313

OVERTON, DAVID E.

1 transaction

$500

314

PERRICH, DOROTHY M.

1 transaction

$500

315

PETRO, JOHN W.

1 transaction

$500

316

PRESTON, BARBARA

1 transaction

$500

317

PUTNEY, APRIL

1 transaction

$500

318

RABINOWITZ, ANDREA

1 transaction

$500

319

READ, ALEXANDRA

1 transaction

$500

320

REDMAN, ANNE M

1 transaction

$500

321

REED, MELANIE

1 transaction

$500

322

RICH, STACY

1 transaction

$500

323

RIDDLE, CLARINE

1 transaction

$500

324

RIZZOLO, CAROL

1 transaction

$500

325

ROBBINS, BONNIE B

1 transaction

$500

326

ROBBINS, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$500

327

ROBINSON, SETH

1 transaction

$500

328

ROTHROCK, LOLLY

1 transaction

$500

329

RUGGIERO, FRANK

1 transaction

$500

330

SANDOVAL, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$500

331

SCHAUER, JAYNE

1 transaction

$500

332

SCHRAYER, LIZ

1 transaction

$500

333

SHERRIS, JACQUELINE

1 transaction

$500

334

SHORETT, ALICE

1 transaction

$500

335

SPENCER, RAYMOND

1 transaction

$500

336

STECKMAN, MATTHEW

1 transaction

$500

337

STEGMAN, TODD

1 transaction

$500

338

STEINMAN, JONATHAN

1 transaction

$500

339

STERLING, GEORGE

1 transaction

$500

340

STESLICKI, JEREMY

1 transaction

$500

341

STEWART, GREGORY

1 transaction

$500

342

STILLMAN, CHARLES

1 transaction

$500

343

SVINTH, MARIAN

1 transaction

$500

344

TATELMAN, DAVID W

1 transaction

$500

345

THAYER, WILLIAM J.

1 transaction

$500

346

THOMAS, DAVID

1 transaction

$500

347

THOMPSON, GAYLE

1 transaction

$500

348

THOMPSON, JOHN R.

1 transaction

$500

349

THORNELL, PAUL

1 transaction

$500

350

UTELA, DAVID R

1 transaction

$500

351

VOCKLER, LARRY

1 transaction

$500

352

WALL, MARILYN J.

1 transaction

$500

353

WEISENBACH, JACQUINOT

1 transaction

$500

354

WEITKAMP, WILLIAM

1 transaction

$500

355

WHITAKER, KEN

1 transaction

$500

356

WILEY, ROBERT

1 transaction

$500

357

WILLIAMS, LARRY

1 transaction

$500

358

WITMAN, MARJORIE

1 transaction

$500

359

WOHL, RONALD

1 transaction

$500

360

WOLFWILETS, VIVIAN

1 transaction

$500

Donor Network - Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 68 nodes and 30 connections (80 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $83,550

Top Donors - Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA]

Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount

10 Orgs14 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped.

+Defense Contractorsconfidence 0.95
Division A, Sec. 171 provides specific funding amounts for Navy shipbuilding programs (e.g., Columbia Class Submarine, Virginia Class Submarine, DDG 51 Program) to defense contractors like Huntington Ingalls, General Dynamics, etc.
+Hospitals & Health Systemsconfidence 0.90
Division A, Sec. 172 appropriates $750,000,000 for FEMA Disaster Relief Fund for major disasters, which benefits hospitals and health systems that provide disaster-related care.
+Telecommunicationsconfidence 0.70
Division B, Sec. 2204 extends the National Cybersecurity Protection System Authorization, which benefits telecom and cybersecurity firms involved in federal cybersecurity infrastructure.
+Cybersecurityconfidence 0.70
Division B, Sec. 2204 extends the National Cybersecurity Protection System Authorization, which benefits cybersecurity contractors providing services to federal systems.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Hospitals & Health Systems$2,400
from 1 contribution
- MELLOTT, JANE$2,400
Defense Contractors$500
from 1 contribution
- HARDWICK, DEREK$500

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Defense

Strong

Vector: 62%

Pages: 128-130AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill provides significant funding for DoD shipbuilding programs, including the Columbia Class Submarine, which directly supports Project 2025's goal of expanding and modernizing the U.S. nuclear force. Additionally, the bill includes provisions to reform DoD acquisition processes by exempting certain procurement requirements, aligning with Project 2025's call for PPBE reform and faster technology fielding."

Key themes:nuclear force modernizationdefense acquisition reformshipbuilding fundingPPBE process reformdefense industrial base

— 95 — Department of Defense 1. Expand and modernize the U.S. nuclear force so that it has the size, sophistication, and tailoring to deter Russia and China simultaneously. 2. Develop a nuclear arsenal with the size, sophistication, and tailoring— including new capabilities at the theater level—to ensure that there is no circumstance in which America is exposed to serious nuclear coercion. l Increase allied counterterrorist burden-sharing. Transnational terrorism remains a threat to Americans even as we pivot toward Asia. 1. Sustain the military forces needed to deter, prevent, and combat terrorism, but at a sustainable cost in concert with other elements of national power and partner efforts. 2. Prioritize enhancing the capability of allies and partners to take the lead in combating terrorism in their regions. DOD ACQUISITION AND SUSTAINMENT (A&S) The DOD’s ability to acquire and field new and existing technologies is essential to the ability of America’s military personnel to fight and win our nation’s wars. To succeed in this endeavor, we must optimize the systems and personnel that the department uses, but the inflexible bureaucratic structure and risk-adverse culture that have developed over the decades make it difficult to provide the tools that warfighters need at the speed of relevance. The number one problem is the DOD budgeting process (instituted in 1961) that requires acquisition spending to be locked years in advance. Because tech- nologies change so rapidly and requirements can change overnight, this creates situations in which military personnel not only go to war with outdated technol- ogy, but also may be fighting with equipment that is less capable than that of their competitors. America owes its military many things, and the most important is the resources they need to survive on the battlefield and carry out the tasks we ask of them. Needed Reforms l Reform the planning, programming, budgeting, and execution (PPBE) process. 1. Enhance funding and authority for DOD mission-focused innovation organizations and away from program-specific stovepipes that, planned for and designed two or three years earlier, may no longer be — 96 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise relevant. This allows the acquisition community to focus on portfolio management and move money around more easily instead of being locked into inflexible, multiyear procurement cycles. 2. The President should examine the recommendations of the congressionally mandated Commission on Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution Reform4 and develop a strategy for implementing those that the Administration considers to be in the best interests of the American people. The commission’s final report is due on September 1, 2023. 3. Develop legislation or other means of providing funding outside the traditional PPBE process for the prototyping and experimentation of emerging technologies that are deemed essential to modernization and future conflict. Consider creating a “fast track” for projects that satisfy the most pressing national security needs. 4. Require the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Under Secretary for Research and Engineering, and all service secretaries to conduct “Night Court” and use existing authorities to terminate outdated or underperforming programs so that money can be used for what works and will work. Require the Under Secretaries and service secretaries to brief the Secretary annually on the results. 5. Require the Office of the Secretary of Defense to research and report on the acquisition processes used by America’s adversaries to improve our understanding of how they are often able to innovate and field new technologies on a faster timeline. l Strengthen America’s defense industrial base. 1. Replenish and maintain U.S. stockpiles of ammunition and other equipment that have been depleted as a result of U.S. support to Ukraine. This will strengthen the defense industry supply chain and ensure that adequate inventory exists if it is needed for a future conflict. 2. Collaborate with industry to develop a prioritized list of reforms that the DOD and Congress can enact and implement to incentivize industry to help America’s military innovate and field needed capabilities.

Department of Homeland Security

Weak

Vector: 63%

Pages: 186-188AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill increases FEMA's disaster relief funding but does not implement any of the Project 2025 FEMA reforms such as raising the per capita indicator, adjusting cost‑share arrangements, winding down NFIP, or terminating preparedness grants. It is only tangentially related through its focus on FEMA funding."

Key themes:FEMAdisaster relieffederal funding

— 153 — Department of Homeland Security l 287(g) program. Issue a memo prohibiting any jurisdiction that applies from being denied access to the program unless good cause is shown. l Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) priorities. Issue Department Management Directive (and ICE companion Directive) to refocus HSI on immigration offenses and criminal offenses typically associated with immigration (for example, human trafficking). All criminal investigative work without a clear nexus to the border or otherwise to Title 8 should be turned over to the appropriate federal agency. l Blackie’s Warrants. ICE OPLA, ERO, and HSI should issue a joint internal memo on operationalizing Blackie’s Warrants for immediate use on worksite enforcement and other appropriate investigations and operations. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) Needed Reforms FEMA is the lead federal agency in preparing for and responding to disasters, but it is overtasked, overcompensates for the lack of state and local preparedness and response, and is regularly in deep debt. After passage of the 1988 Stafford Act,12 the number of declared federal disasters rose dramatically as most disaster costs were shifted from states and local governments to the federal government. In addition, state-friendly FEMA regulations, such as a “per capita indicator,” failed to maintain the pace of inflation and made it easy to meet disaster declaration thresholds. This combination has left FEMA unprepared in both readiness and funding for the truly catastrophic disasters in which its services are most needed. Reform of FEMA requires a greater emphasis on federalism and state and local preparedness, leaving FEMA to focus on large, widespread disasters. Under the Stafford Act, FEMA has the authority to adjust the per capita indi- cator for damages, which creates a threshold under which states and localities are not eligible for public assistance. FEMA should raise the threshold because the per capita indicator has not kept pace with inflation, and this over time has effectively lowered the threshold for public assistance and caused FEMA’s resources to be stretched perilously thin. Alternatively, applying a deductible could accomplish a similar outcome while also incentivizing states to take a more proactive role in their own preparedness and response capabilities. In addition, Congress should change the cost-share arrangement so that the federal government covers 25 per- cent of the costs for small disasters with the cost share reaching a maximum of 75 percent for truly catastrophic disasters. FEMA is also responsible for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), nearly all of which is issued by the federal government. Washington provides — 154 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise insurance at prices lower than the actuarially fair rate, thereby subsidizing flood insurance. Then, when flood costs exceed NFIP’s revenue, FEMA seeks taxpay- er-funded bailouts. Current NFIP debt is $20.5 billion, and in 2017, Congress canceled $16 billion in debt when FEMA reached its borrowing authority limit. These subsidies and bailouts only encourage more development in flood zones, increasing the potential losses to both NFIP and the taxpayer. The NFIP should be wound down and replaced with private insurance starting with the least risky areas currently identified by the program. Budget Issues FEMA manages all grants for DHS, and these grants have become pork for states, localities, and special-interest groups. Since 2002, DHS/FEMA have provided more than $56 billion in preparedness grants for state, local, tribal, and territorial governments. For FY 2023, President Biden requested more than $3.5 billion for federal assistance grants.13 Funds provided under these programs do not provide measurable gains for preparedness or resiliency. Rather, more than any objective needs, political interests appear to direct the flow of nondisaster funds. The principles of federalism should be upheld; these indicate that states better understand their unique needs and should bear the costs of their particularized programs. FEMA employees in Washington, D.C., should not determine how bil- lions of federal tax dollars should be awarded to train local law enforcement officers in Texas, harden cybersecurity infrastructure in Utah, or supplement migrant shelters in Arizona. DHS should not be in the business of handing out federal tax dollars: These grants should be terminated. Accomplishing this, however, will require action by Members of Congress who repeatedly vote to fund grants for political reasons. The transition should focus on building resilience and return on investment in line with real threats. Personnel FEMA currently has four Senate-confirmed positions. Only the Administrator should be confirmed by the Senate; other political leadership need not be con- firmed by the Senate. Additionally, FEMA’s “springing Cabinet position” should be eliminated, as this creates significant unnecessary challenges to the functioning of the whole of DHS at points in time when coordinated responses are most needed. CYBERSECURITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY AGENCY (CISA) Needed Reforms CISA is supposed to have two key roles: (1) protection of the federal civilian government networks (.gov) while coordinating the execution of national cyber defense and sharing information with non-federal and private-sector partners

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Minimal

Vector: 62%

Pages: 413-415AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill is a continuing resolution focused on defense, disaster relief, and health program extensions, with no provisions addressing the Department of Energy, the Grid Deployment Office, grid reliability reforms, or any of the specific Project 2025 energy policy objectives."

Key themes:federal appropriationsbudget process

— 380 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Budget EERE was funded at slightly more than $2.8 billion in FY 2021, and DOE requested slightly more than $4.0 billion for FY 2023.47 Congress needs to rescind the appropriated monies that EERE has not spent and begin fresh with new appropriations. GRID DEPLOYMENT OFFICE (GDO) Mission/Overview The Grid Deployment Office was established to implement parts of the Infra- structure Investment and Jobs Act. Pursuant to the IIJA, GDO administers funds appropriated by Congress to support transmission expansion and low/zero carbon resources. In addition, GDO is developing studies of the electric grid to address congestion, enhance reliability and resilience, and promote “clean” energy.48 Needed Reforms l End grid planning and focus instead on reliability. FERC and NERC have the primary responsibility for addressing reliability, states have the primary authority to site and permit transmission lines, and regional transmission organizations assist in planning regional transmission needs for parts of the country, but Congress granted some grid planning and siting authority to FERC and DOE through the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and IIJA, as well as grid funding through the Inflation Reduction Act. Instead of focusing on grid expansion for the benefit of renewable resources or supporting low/carbon generation, GDO should be incorporated into the reformed Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response, which would work to enhance the grid’s reliability and resilience. To the extent that they remain in effect, the funding programs that GDO oversees and administers should emphasize grid reliability, not renewables expansion. l Consider whether to defund the civil nuclear tax credit program and hydroelectric power efficiency and production incentives established in the IIJA and administered through GDO. If subsidies for renewable resources are not repealed, it may be necessary to continue subsidies for nuclear and hydro to ensure grid reliability. New Policies l Eliminate GDO and assign necessary activities to the reformed CESER. It appears that GDO’s current purpose is to promote the integration of low/zero carbon resources onto the grid by supporting subsidies for such resources and building new transmission facilities at

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Minimal

Vector: 62%

Pages: 443-445AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on defense shipbuilding, disaster relief, and health program extensions, with no provisions related to the Department of Energy, energy policy, grid security, or nuclear initiatives outlined in the Project 2025 DOE section."

Key themes:federal appropriationsbudget extensions

— 411 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions 19. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13920, “Securing the United States Bulk-Power System,” May 1, 2020, in Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 86 (May 4, 2020), pp. 26595–26599, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2020-05-04/pdf/2020-09695.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 20. 18 U.S. Code § 824a(c), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/824a (accessed February 27, 2023). 21. Report No. 117-98, Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, 2022, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. House of Representatives, 117th Cong. 1st Sess., July 20, 2021, p. 6, https:// www.congress.gov/117/crpt/hrpt98/CRPT-117hrpt98.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 22. H.R. 3684, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law No. 11-58, 117th Congress, November 15, 2021, Division J, Title III. 23. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, p. 7. 24. Timothy Gardner, “White House Asks Congress for $500 mln to Modernize Oil Reserve,” Reuters, November 16, 2022, https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-oil-spr-idAFL1N32C36I (accessed February 13, 2023). 25. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity, “Our History,” https://www.energy.gov/oe/about-us/our- history (accessed February 13, 2023). 26. Press release, “Secretary of Energy Signs Order to Mitigate Security Risks to the Nation’s Electric Grid,” U.S. Department of Energy, December 17, 2021, https://www.energy.gov/articles/secretary-energy-signs-order- mitigate-security-risks-nations-electric-grid (accessed February 13, 2023). 27. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity, “Revocation of Prohibition Order Securing Critical Defense Facilities,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 76 (April 22, 2021), pp. 21308–21309, https://www.govinfo.gov/ content/pkg/FR-2021-04-22/pdf/2021-08483.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 28. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 19 and 61. 29. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, “About Us,” https://www.energy.gov/ne/about-us (accessed February 13, 2023). 30. H.R. 3809, Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, Public Law No. 97-425, 97th Congress, January 7, 1983, https:// www.congress.gov/97/statute/STATUTE-96/STATUTE-96-Pg2201.pdf (accessed February 24, 2023). 31. The Heritage Foundation, “Budget Blueprint for Fiscal Year 2023: Reduce the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy,” https://www.heritage.org/budget/pages/recommendations/1.270.127.html. 32. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 23 and 58. 33. 42 USC § 16291, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/16291 (accessed February 27, 2023). 34. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, “About Us: Mission,” https:// www.energy.gov/fecm/mission (accessed February 13, 2023). 35. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Carbon Capture and Storage: Actions Needed to Improve DOE Management of Demonstration Projects, GAO-22-105111, December2021, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-22- 105111.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 36. International Energy Agency, The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions, World Energy Outlook Special Report, revised March 2022, https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ffd2a83b-8c30-4e9d-980a- 52b6d9a86fdc/TheRoleofCriticalMineralsinCleanEnergyTransitions.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 37. See 42 U.S. Code § 16291. 38. 42 U.S. Code Ch. 55, §§ 4321–4347, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/chapter-55 (accessed February 27, 2023). 39. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Categorical Exclusions from Environmental Review,” Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Request for Comment, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 87 (May 7, 2021), pp. 24514–24516, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-05-07/pdf/2021-09675.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023), and Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Categorical Exclusions from Environmental Review,” Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Reopening of Comment Period, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 160 (August 23, 2021), pp. 47032–47033, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-08-23/pdf/2021-18058.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023). 40. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 19, 21, 23, and 52. — 412 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 41. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 3, 6, 12, 19, 21, and 23. 42. S. 622, Energy Policy and Conservation Act, Public Law 94-163, 94th Congress, December 22, 1975, https:// www.congress.gov/94/statute/STATUTE-89/STATUTE-89-Pg871.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023). 43. H.R. 6, Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law No. 109-58, 109th Congress, August 8, 2005, https://www. congress.gov/109/plaws/publ58/PLAW-109publ58.pdf (accessed February 27, 2023). 44. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, “About the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy,” https://www.energy.gov/eere/about-office-energy-efficiency-and- renewable-energy (accessed February 28, 2023). 45. Ibid. 46. See note 41, supra. 47. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 19, 23, 43, and 49. 48. See U.S. Department of Energy, Grid Deployment Office, “About Us,” https://www.energy.gov/gdo/about-us (accessed February 13, 2023). 49. U.S. Department of Energy, Grid Deployment Office, “Building a Better Grid Initiative,” https://www.energy. gov/gdo/building-better-grid-initiative (accessed February 13, 2023). 50. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, pp. 2, 19, 21, 23, and 84. “The FY 2023 Budget Request to Congress proposes to split the Electricity appropriation account into two accounts: Electricity and Grid Deployment Office (GDO). Had the proposed FY 2023 structure been in place in FY 2021 and FY 2022, the $7,000,000 shown under the Electricity account’s Transmission Permitting and Technical Assistance (TPTA) program would have appeared under Grid Technical Assistance in GDO and the $3,000,000 shown under Program Direction in the Electricity account represents the estimated share of Electricity PD funding associated with TPTA and would have appeared under Program Direction in GDO.” Ibid., p. 84, note. 51. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, “About Us: Our Mission,” https://www. energy.gov/oced/about-us (accessed February 13, 2023). 52. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, p. 6. 53. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, “About Us: Our Story,” https://www. energy.gov/oced/about-us (accessed February 28, 2023). 54. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, “OCED Project Portfolio,” https://www. energy.gov/oced/office-clean-energy-demonstrations (accessed February 28, 2023). 55. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Volume 3, Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response, Federal Energy Management Program, Grid Deployment Office, Indian Energy Policy & Programs, Loan Programs, Manufacturing & Energy Supply Chains, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, Petroleum Reserves, Power Marketing Administrations, State and Community Energy Programs, April 2022, p. 104, https://www.energy. gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/doe-fy2023-budget-volume-3-v2.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 56. See, for example, ibid., pp. 104 and 107. 57. U.S. Department of Energy, Loan Program Office, “LPO Year in Review 2022: New Legislation,” January 5, 2023, https://www.energy.gov/lpo/articles/lpo-year-review-2022 (accessed February 28, 2023). Emphases in original. 58. H.R. 6256, To Ensure That Goods Made with Forced Labor in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China Do Not Enter the United States Market, and for Other Purposes, Public Law No. 117-78, 117th Congress, December 23, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ78/PLAW-117publ78.pdf (accessed February 28, 2023). 59. H.R. 2272, America COMPETES Act, Public Law 110–69, 110th Congress, August 9, 2007, § 5012, https://www. congress.gov/110/plaws/publ69/PLAW-110publ69.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 60. Ibid., § 5012(c)(1). 61. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Department of Energy FY 2023 Congressional Budget Request, Budget in Brief, March 2022, p. 103.

Department of Agriculture

Minimal

Vector: 61%

Pages: 344-346AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on defense, disaster relief, and tribal relocation funding with no provisions related to the Department of Agriculture or food system policies outlined in Project 2025."

— 311 — Department of Agriculture ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Summary, p.1, https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/ files/documents/2023-usda-budget-summary.pdf (accessed December 14, 2022). 2. See, for example, U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Transforming the U.S. Food System,” https://www.usda. gov/fst (accessed December 14, 2022). 3. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Summary, p.1. 4. U.S. Department of Agriculture, “USDA Celebrates 150 Years,” https://www.usda.gov/our-agency/about-usda/ history (accessed December 16, 2022). 5. The law stated, “[T]here is hereby established at the seat of government of the United States a Department of Agriculture, the general designs and duties of which shall be to acquire and to diffuse among the people of the United States useful information on subjects connected with agriculture in the most general and comprehensive sense of that word, and to procure, propagate, and distribute among the people new and valuable seeds and plants.” Gladys L. Baker et al., Century of Service: The First 100 Years of the United States Department of Agriculture, (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1963) p. 13, https://babel. hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.b4254098&view=1up&seq=33 (accessed December 16, 2022). 6. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Summary, p. 2. 7. Ibid., p. 2. 8. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2022–2026, p. 3, https://www.usda.gov/sites/ default/files/documents/usda-fy-2022-2026-strategic-plan.pdf (accessed December 14, 2022). 9. News release, “USDA Announces Framework for Shoring Up the Food Supply Chain and Transforming the Food System to Be Fairer, More Competitive, More Resilient,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, June 1, 2022, https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2022/06/01/usda-announces-framework-shoring-food-supply- chain-and-transforming (accessed December 14, 2022). 10. U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Transforming the U.S. Food System.” 11. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2022–2026, pp. 1–2. 12. U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Background on the U.S. Approach to the 2021 UN Food Systems Summit,” August 4, 2021, https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Background-on-US-approach-2021-UN- Food-Systems-Summit.pdf (accessed December 14, 2022). 13. U.S. Department of Agriculture, “UN Food Systems Summit,” https://www.usda.gov/oce/sustainability/un- summit (accessed December 14, 2022). 14. Mark Bittman et al., “How a National Food Policy Could Save Millions of American Lives,” The Washington Post, November 7, 2014, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-a-national-food-policy-could- save-millions-of-american-lives/2014/11/07/89c55e16-637f-11e4-836c-83bc4f26eb67_story.html (accessed December 14, 2022); Daren Bakst and Gabriella Beaumont-Smith, “No, We Don’t Need to Transform the American Food System,” The Daily Signal, February 26, 2021, https://www.dailysignal.com/2021/02/26/ no-we-dont-need-to-transform-the-american-food-system/ (accessed December 14, 2022); and Daren Bakst, “Biden’s Food Conference Should Put People First, Not Environmental Extremism,” The Daily Signal, September 22, 2022, https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/09/22/bidens-food-conference-should-put-people- first-not-environmental-extremism/ (accessed December 14, 2022). 15. News release, “USDA to Invest Up to $300 Million in New Organic Transition Initiative,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, August 22, 2022, https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2022/08/22/usda-invest-300- million-new-organic-transition-initiative (accessed December 14, 2022). 16. Gary Baise, “Sri Lanka’s Green New Deal Was a Disaster,” Farm Futures, November 14, 2022, https://www. farmprogress.com/commentary/sri-lankas-green-new-deal-was-disaster (accessed December 16, 2022). 17. See, for example, Catherine Greene et al., “Growing Organic Demand Provides High-Value Opportunities for Many Types of Producers,” Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, February 6, 2017, https://www. ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2017/januaryfebruary/growing-organic-demand-provides-high-value-opportunities- for-many-types-of-producers/#:~:text=ERS%20research%20shows%20that%20many,flavor%20desired%20 by%20the%20consumer (accessed December 14, 2022), and Andrea Carlson, “Investigating Retail Price Premiums for Organic Foods,” Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, May 24, 2016, https://www.ers. usda.gov/amber-waves/2016/may/investigating-retail-price-premiums-for-organic-foods/ (accessed December 16, 2022). Further, there are many myths, such as those regarding the alleged health benefit of organic food. One — 312 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise meta study found that “[t]he published literature lacks strong evidence that organic foods are significantly more nutritious than conventional foods.” Crystal Smith-Spangler et al., “Are Organic Foods Safer or Healthier Than Conventional Alternatives,” Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 157, No. 5 (September 4, 2012), pp. 348–366, https:// www.acpjournals.org/doi/epdf/10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00007 (accessed December 16, 2022). 18. Steve Savage, “USDA Data Confirm Organic Yields Significantly Lower Than With Conventional Farming,” Genetic Literacy Project, February 16, 2018, https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2018/02/16/usda-data-confirm- organic-yields-dramatically-lower-conventional-farming/ (accessed December 16, 2022). 19. See, for example, U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Notice: Climate-Smart Agriculture and Forestry Partnership Program, Request for Comments,” USDA–2021–0010, October 21, 2021, https://www.regulations. gov/document/USDA-2021-0010-0001 (accessed December 16, 2022). 20. Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, Public Law 117–169. 21. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, “Productivity Growth in U.S. Agriculture (1948–2019),” https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/agricultural-productivity-in-the-u-s/productivity- growth-in-u-s-agriculture-1948-2019/ (accessed December 14, 2022). 22. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, “Total Food Budget Share Increased from 9.4 Percent of Disposable Income to 10.3 Percent in 2021,” July 15, 2022, https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ chart-gallery/gallery/chart-detail/?chartId=76967 (accessed December 14, 2022). 23. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Quintiles of Income Before Taxes: Annual Expenditure Means, Shares, and Standard Errors, and Coefficients of Variation, Consumer Expenditure Surveys,” 2021, Table 1101, https://www.bls.gov/cex/tables/calendar-year/mean-item-share-average-standard-error/cu- income-quintiles-before-taxes-2021.pdf (accessed December 16, 2022), and Daren Bakst and Patrick Tyrrell, “Big Government Policies That Hurt the Poor and How to Address Them,” Heritage Foundation Special Report No.176, April 5, 2017, p. 7, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2017-04/SR176.pdf. 24. Daren Bakst and Joshua Sewell, “Congress Should Stop Abrogating Its Spending Power and Rein in the USDA Slush Fund,” Heritage Foundation Issue Brief No. 6052, February 19, 2021, p. 2, https://www.heritage.org/ budget-and-spending/report/congress-should-stop-abrogating-its-spending-power-and-rein-the-usda. 25. Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act of 1948, Public Law 80–806. 26. Bakst and Sewall, “Congress Should Stop Abrogating Its Spending Power.” 27. Ibid., p. 3. 28. Daren Bakst, “Comment from Bakst, Darren” on “Notice: Climate-Smart Agriculture and Forestry Partnership Program, Request for Comments,” USDA–2021–0010, October 21, 2021,” November 1, 2021, https://www. regulations.gov/document/USDA-2021-0010-0001/comment?filter=bakst (accessed December 16, 2022). 29. U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Notice: Climate-Smart Agriculture and Forestry Partnership Program.” 30. Megan Stubbs, “The Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC),” Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, updated January 14, 2021, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R44606 (accessed December 16, 2022). 31. “Overall, 34 percent of all farms reported receiving some type of Government payment in 2021,” and “[o]verall, 14 percent of U.S. farms participated in Federal crop insurance programs.” Christine Whitt, Noah Miller, and Ryan Olver, “America’s Farms and Ranches at a Glance: 2022 Edition,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, pp. 24 and 26, https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/105388/eib-247. pdf?v=527.4 (accessed March 18, 2023). This data, which apparently does not cover crop insurance, included payments beyond just commodity payments, such as conservation payments. 32. Randy Schnepf, “Farm Safety-Net Payments Under the 2014 Farm Bill: Comparison by Program Crop,” Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, August 11, 2017, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44914.pdf (accessed December 14, 2022). 33. Although livestock and specialty crop producers do receive some subsidies, former American Farm Bureau Federation President Bob Stallman captured the subsidy issue well. He “dismisse[d] outright the claim that farmers couldn’t survive without subsidy money. ‘Why does the livestock industry survive without subsidies?’ he ask[ed]. ‘Why does the specialty crop [fruit and vegetable] industry survive?’” Tamar Haspel, “Why Do Taxpayers Subsidize Rich Farmers?” The Washington Post, March 15, 2018, https://www.washingtonpost. com/lifestyle/food/why-do-taxpayers-subsidize-rich-farmers/2018/03/15/50e89906-27b6-11e8-b79d- f3d931db7f68_story.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Murray, Patty

Northwest Straits Marine Conservation Initiative Reauthorization Act of 2025

119/s/1433

Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act

119/s/1737

Purple Heart Veterans Education Act of 2025

119/s/342

Further Additional Continuing Appropriations and Other Extensions Act, 2025