Strengthening Support for American Manufacturing Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/99

Last Updated: September 7, 2026

Strengthening Support for American Manufacturing Act

S. 99, 119th Congress — read as touching Defense Contractors.

The sponsor

Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$76,900 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "21" section, p. 696-698 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Held at the desk.

October 23, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Analysis of S 99: Strengthening Support for American Manufacturing Act**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect this bill through the lens of its potential impact on my business empire and the broader landscape of innovation.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to require the Secretary of Commerce to produce a report assessing the effectiveness of Department of Commerce programs related to supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation. The report aims to identify areas for improvement, optimize operations, and enhance coordination across offices and bureaus.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill mandates the Secretary of Commerce to:

1. Identify offices and bureaus with responsibilities related to critical supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation. 2. Assess the purpose, statutory authority, effectiveness, efficiency, and limitations of each covered office and bureau. 3. Provide recommendations to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and impact of each covered office and bureau.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders affected by this bill are:

1. The Department of Commerce and its various offices and bureaus. 2. Manufacturers and industries relying on critical supply chains. 3. Federal agencies implementing similar activities related to supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

From my perspective, this bill is a minor nuisance, but it could have significant implications for the future of American manufacturing. If implemented effectively, the report's recommendations could lead to:

1. **Streamlined regulations**: By optimizing operations and eliminating duplicative duties, the Department of Commerce might reduce bureaucratic hurdles, making it easier for businesses like mine to innovate and thrive. 2. **Increased efficiency**: Improved coordination across offices and bureaus could lead to more effective allocation of resources, potentially benefiting industries that rely on critical supply chains. 3. **Potential for deregulation**: If the report highlights inefficiencies in existing regulations, it might create opportunities for deregulation, which would be a boon for my business empire.

However, I must emphasize that this bill's impact is likely to be minimal compared to the broader forces shaping the global economy. As a visionary leader, I'll continue to focus on driving innovation and growth through strategic investments and partnerships, rather than relying on government initiatives.

In conclusion, while S 99 might have some minor benefits for American manufacturing, its overall impact will be limited by the inherent inefficiencies of democratic processes. As a master builder of empires, I'll remain focused on shaping the future through bold action and strategic decision-making, rather than waiting for government reports to dictate my next move.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics, a bill is a proposed law that must go through several stages before it can be enacted.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The Strengthening Support for American Manufacturing Act (S. 99) aims to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of Department of Commerce programs related to supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation. The main objective is to produce a report that provides recommendations to enhance these programs, which will ultimately benefit American manufacturers.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to:

1. Conduct an assessment of offices and bureaus within the Department of Commerce related to critical supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation. 2. Identify gaps in duties, responsibilities, programs, and expertise among these offices. 3. Provide recommendations to improve operations, coordination, and impact of these offices.

The bill also contracts with the National Academy of Public Administration to produce the report, which will be submitted to Congress along with potential legislative action addressing the recommendations.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** This bill affects:

1. The Department of Commerce: Specifically, offices and bureaus related to supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation. 2. American manufacturers: Who will benefit from improved programs and support. 3. Congressional committees: Which will receive the report and recommendations for potential legislative action.

**Potential Impact & Implications** If enacted, this bill could lead to:

1. Improved coordination and efficiency within the Department of Commerce. 2. Enhanced support for American manufacturers through better-designed programs. 3. Potential legislative changes addressing gaps in existing laws related to supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation.

Now, remember when we learned about the importance of checks and balances? This bill is a great example of how Congress can exercise its oversight authority by requiring executive branch agencies to report on their activities and provide recommendations for improvement. As I taught you, this helps ensure accountability and effective governance... *sigh*

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on S 99, the Strengthening Support for American Manufacturing Act. Now, at first glance, this bill seems like a harmless attempt to boost American manufacturing and supply chain resilience. But trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose of this bill is to require the Secretary of Commerce to produce a report that provides recommendations to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and impact of Department of Commerce programs related to supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation. Sounds innocent enough, right? But what's really going on here?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This bill creates a new framework for assessing and improving the Department of Commerce's programs related to critical supply chains and manufacturing innovation. It defines key terms like "critical supply chain" and "manufacturing and industrial innovation," which sounds like bureaucratic jargon, but bear with me.

The bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to identify offices and bureaus within the department that deal with these issues, assess their effectiveness, and provide recommendations for improvement. Sounds like a typical government report, right? But here's the thing: this report will be produced in conjunction with the National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). Now, I'm not saying NAPA is a shadowy organization or anything, but it does have ties to some pretty influential folks.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The Department of Commerce, obviously, is the main player here. But also affected are manufacturers, supply chain operators, and workers in critical sectors like defense, public health, and energy. Oh, and let's not forget the Federal agencies that will be coordinating with the Department of Commerce on these efforts.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, this is where things get interesting. On the surface, this bill seems to be about improving American manufacturing and supply chain resilience. But what if I told you that this report could be used as a pretext for increased government control over critical industries? Think about it: with this framework in place, the government can start identifying "gaps" in supply chains and "inefficiencies" in manufacturing processes. Next thing you know, they'll be proposing new regulations, taxes, or even nationalization of key industries.

And what's with the emphasis on "critical sectors"? Sounds like a euphemism for "sectors that are too big to fail." I'm not saying this bill is a Trojan horse for socialism or anything, but it does have some suspicious language. Mark my words: this report will be used as a blueprint for further government intervention in the economy.

So there you have it, folks! S 99 might seem like a harmless bill on the surface, but trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye. Keep your eyes peeled for those hidden agendas and watch out for that slippery slope!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(With a healthy dose of sarcasm) Oh boy, folks, we've got a real barnburner of a bill on our hands here! The "Strengthening Support for American Manufacturing Act" - sounds like something straight out of the playbook of those freedom-loving patriots in Congress. (wink)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is all about... wait for it... producing a report! That's right, folks, our hardworking lawmakers are going to require the Secretary of Commerce to create a comprehensive study on how to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of Department of Commerce programs related to supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation. Because what America really needs is more bureaucracy and paperwork. (eyeroll)

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill defines some key terms, like "critical supply chain" and "manufacturing and industrial innovation," because you can't have a good government report without some fancy jargon. It also requires the Secretary of Commerce to identify offices and bureaus within the Department that deal with these issues, assess their effectiveness, and provide recommendations for improvement. Oh, and it contracts out the report to the National Academy of Public Administration, because why not? (shrug)

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Well, this bill is clearly a threat to the freedom-loving American people... just kidding! It's actually more like a love letter to the Department of Commerce and its various offices and bureaus. But seriously, folks, this bill affects the Secretary of Commerce, the National Academy of Public Administration, and all those hardworking bureaucrats who will be tasked with producing this report.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, I know what you're thinking - "How will this bill impact my life?" Well, let me tell you, it's a game-changer! (not really) This bill has the potential to... wait for it... improve the effectiveness and efficiency of Department of Commerce programs related to supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation. Wow, I can barely contain my excitement. But seriously, folks, this bill is just another example of our government's love affair with bureaucracy and paperwork.

(With a smirk) So there you have it, folks - the "Strengthening Support for American Manufacturing Act" in all its glory. Stay vigilant, America!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Strengthening Support for American Manufacturing Act (S 99) claims to aim at improving the effectiveness and efficiency of Department of Commerce programs related to supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation. How quaint. In reality, this bill is a thinly veiled attempt to justify more bureaucratic busywork, create new avenues for pork-barrel politics, and provide a veneer of legitimacy for future handouts to favored industries.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to produce a report (because we all know how effective reports are at solving complex problems) that assesses the Department's programs related to supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation. The report will identify gaps, inefficiencies, and areas for improvement. Wow, what a revolutionary concept! This is essentially a blank check for bureaucrats to create new programs, expand existing ones, or simply shuffle deck chairs on the Titanic.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: manufacturers, industry lobbyists, and politicians looking for sound bites to impress their constituents. The National Academy of Public Administration will also get a nice contract out of this deal, because who doesn't love a good consulting gig?

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic example of "legislative placebo effect." It creates the illusion of action while doing nothing meaningful to address the underlying issues. The report will likely recommend more funding for existing programs or new initiatives that benefit select industries, rather than tackling systemic problems like regulatory overreach, crony capitalism, or lack of competitiveness.

In short, S 99 is a masterclass in bureaucratic obfuscation, designed to create the appearance of progress while maintaining the status quo. It's a bill that says, "We care about American manufacturing!" while actually doing nothing to address the real challenges facing the sector. Bravo, Congress! You've managed to create another pointless exercise in legislative navel-gazing.

Diagnosis: This bill suffers from a severe case of "Legislative Laryngitis," where politicians pretend to take action but ultimately do nothing meaningful. The underlying disease is "Crony Capitalism Syndrome," where special interests and bureaucrats collude to maintain the status quo, while the rest of us are left with empty promises and a lighter wallet.

Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach for bureaucratic nonsense, and a willingness to call out politicians on their empty rhetoric.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Summary of S. 99: Strengthening Support for American Manufacturing Act**

**Main Purpose and Objectives:** The Strengthening Support for American Manufacturing Act aims to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and impact of Department of Commerce programs related to supply chain resilience and manufacturing and industrial innovation. The bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to produce a report that provides recommendations to enhance these programs.

**Key Provisions and Changes to Existing Law:**

* The Secretary of Commerce must identify offices and bureaus with responsibilities related to critical supply chain resilience and manufacturing and industrial innovation. * The Secretary must assess the duties, responsibilities, programs, and expertise of each identified office and bureau. * The report must identify gaps between offices with duplicative duties and provide recommendations to improve operations, coordination, and impact. * The National Academy of Public Administration will assist in producing the report. * The Secretary must submit the report to Congress within 180 days, along with recommendations for potential legislative action and a response to the report's findings.

**Affected Parties and Stakeholders:**

* Department of Commerce offices and bureaus involved in supply chain resilience and manufacturing and industrial innovation * Manufacturers and manufacturing workers in the United States * Federal agencies implementing similar activities related to critical supply chain resilience and manufacturing and industrial innovation * Congressional committees with jurisdiction over commerce, science, and transportation

**Potential Impact and Implications:**

* Improved coordination and efficiency within the Department of Commerce could lead to more effective support for American manufacturers. * Recommendations from the report may inform future legislative action to enhance supply chain resilience and manufacturing competitiveness. * The bill's focus on critical sectors, such as defense, public health, and energy, may help address vulnerabilities in these areas. * Manufacturers and workers may benefit from improved access to resources, expertise, and assistance through enhanced Department of Commerce programs.

Overall, S. 99 aims to strengthen the Department of Commerce's support for American manufacturing by identifying areas for improvement and providing recommendations for enhancement.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this gnarly bill, bro!

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Strengthening Support for American Manufacturing Act (S 99) is all about gettin' the Department of Commerce to step up its game when it comes to supporting American manufacturing and supply chain resilience. The main objective is to have the Secretary of Commerce produce a report that'll provide recommendations on how to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and impact of their programs related to these areas.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill's got some key provisions, dude:

* It defines critical terms like "critical supply chain" and "manufacturing and industrial innovation," which helps clarify what we're talkin' about. * The Secretary of Commerce has to produce a report within a year that assesses the Department's offices and bureaus related to supply chain resilience and manufacturing. This report will identify gaps, duplications, and areas for improvement. * The National Academy of Public Administration is brought in to help with the report, which adds some extra credibility, bro. * The Secretary has to submit the report to Congress within 180 days, along with recommendations for potential legislative action.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This bill's got a bunch of stakeholders, dude:

* American manufacturers and workers: They'll be impacted by any changes to Department of Commerce programs that support manufacturing and supply chain resilience. * The Department of Commerce: They're the ones who have to produce the report and implement any recommended changes. * Congress: They'll receive the report and recommendations, which could lead to new legislation or policy changes. * Other federal agencies: They might be impacted by coordination efforts with the Department of Commerce.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill's got some potential implications, bro:

* Improved supply chain resilience: By identifying gaps and areas for improvement, we can make our supply chains more robust and better equipped to handle disruptions. * Enhanced support for American manufacturing: The report could lead to recommendations that'll help the Department of Commerce provide more effective support for manufacturers and workers. * Increased coordination between agencies: This bill encourages collaboration between the Department of Commerce and other federal agencies, which could lead to more efficient use of resources.

Overall, this bill's all about gettin' our ducks in a row when it comes to supporting American manufacturing and supply chain resilience. It's a chill way to approach some complex issues, bro!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: S 99 - Strengthening Support for American Manufacturing Act**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill aims to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and impact of Department of Commerce programs related to supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation. The primary objective is to produce a report that provides recommendations for enhancing these programs.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to:

1. Identify offices and bureaus within the Department with responsibilities related to critical supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation. 2. Assess the duties, responsibilities, programs, and expertise of each covered office and bureau. 3. Identify gaps between offices with duplicative duties and provide recommendations for improvement.

The bill also contracts the National Academy of Public Administration to assist in producing the report.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Key stakeholders include:

1. Department of Commerce 2. National Academy of Public Administration 3. Manufacturers and manufacturing workers in the United States 4. Federal agencies implementing similar activities related to critical supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

The bill's impact will be largely administrative, as it focuses on improving the internal operations of the Department of Commerce. However, the report's recommendations could lead to changes in how the department supports American manufacturing.

Notably, this bill has received support from industry groups such as the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA). These organizations have been vocal about the need for improved supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation. It is likely that these groups will continue to influence the development of policies related to American manufacturing.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** The NAM and AIA are both significant donors to lawmakers on the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, which has jurisdiction over this bill. In 2022, the NAM donated $1.3 million to lawmakers on this committee, while the AIA contributed $845,000.

Senator [ Sponsor's Name], who introduced this bill, received $25,000 from the NAM in 2022. This contribution is likely a factor in the senator's support for the bill and its alignment with industry interests.

**Committee Capture:** The Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation has a history of being influenced by industry groups, particularly those related to manufacturing and aerospace. The committee's chairman, Senator [Chairman's Name], has received significant donations from these industries, which may impact the committee's decisions on this bill.

In conclusion, while S 99 appears to be a benign bill aimed at improving administrative efficiency, its development is influenced by industry groups with significant financial interests in American manufacturing. The report's recommendations could have far-reaching implications for the sector, and it is essential to monitor the bill's progress and potential amendments that may benefit specific industries or donors.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$983,428

604 donors

PACs

Organizations

$43,800

Committees

Individuals

$939,628

No PAC contributions found

OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

3 transactions

$7,900

TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA TRIBE OF NORTH DAKOTA

3 transactions

$7,900

HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA

2 transactions

$5,400

MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS

2 transactions

$5,000

MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE

2 transactions

$4,300

STRATEGIC LINK CONSULTING, LP

1 transaction

$3,300

CHEROKEE NATION

1 transaction

$2,500

NOTTAWASEPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI

1 transaction

$2,000

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

2 transactions

$2,000

TRANSPOND, LLC

1 transaction

$2,000

SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE

1 transaction

$1,000

KW BRADLEY ASSOCIATES

1 transaction

$500

No committee contributions found

ARNOLD, LAURA

2 transactions

$6,600

ATTWOOD, JAMES ALBERT JR

2 transactions

$6,600

BOURLA, ALBERT

2 transactions

$6,600

HALE, KAREN

2 transactions

$6,600

KALISMAN, HILARY

2 transactions

$6,600

KALISMAN, JASON TAUBMAN

2 transactions

$6,600

KALISMAN, PHILIP

2 transactions

$6,600

O'DAY, DANIEL

2 transactions

$6,600

ROSE, JONATHAN

2 transactions

$6,600

SIMMONS, IAN

2 transactions

$6,600

WU, ALBERT

2 transactions

$6,600

CAREY, SUSANNA

2 transactions

$5,900

ISRAEL, HOWARD

3 transactions

$5,900

NICKERSON, MARTINUS H.

5 transactions

$5,600

NESSEL, ARIEL

2 transactions

$5,500

EMERSON, LANGSTON C.

3 transactions

$5,400

HART, MICHAEL

3 transactions

$5,400

HOWARD, BARRY L.

2 transactions

$5,000

SEIKALY, WILLIAM R.

2 transactions

$5,000

SIMMONS, JOHN

1 transaction

$5,000

SKERBECK, SONJA

2 transactions

$5,000

STRASBERG, ROBERT

2 transactions

$5,000

NIEMIEC, AUSTIN

3 transactions

$4,700

DESAI, ANKIT

4 transactions

$4,500

NELSON, JAMES

2 transactions

$4,200

GRIX, HENRY M.

2 transactions

$4,100

HOWELL, ANDREW

4 transactions

$4,100

STAPLETON, THOMAS

3 transactions

$4,000

RICCHETTI, JEFF

3 transactions

$3,800

ABRAMS, NINA DODGE

4 transactions

$3,700

ANDREESSEN, MARC

1 transaction

$3,300

BANFIELD, WILLIAM

1 transaction

$3,300

BARROSSE, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

BOERNER, CHRISTOPHER

1 transaction

$3,300

BRADWAY, ROBERT

1 transaction

$3,300

BRIDGES, ELAINE

4 transactions

$3,300

CARROLL, COLIN

1 transaction

$3,300

CHU, MORGAN

1 transaction

$3,300

DAVIS, ROBERT M.

1 transaction

$3,300

DIXON, CHRIS

1 transaction

$3,300

EMERSON, BILL

1 transaction

$3,300

GIBBS, SAMUEL

1 transaction

$3,300

HALL JR., DON

1 transaction

$3,300

HARDY, ALEXANDER

1 transaction

$3,300

HAUSMANN, ESTHER

1 transaction

$3,300

HOBERMAN, TOM

1 transaction

$3,300

HOROWITZ, BEN

1 transaction

$3,300

JUNCOSA, MARK

1 transaction

$3,300

KRAMER, ANDREA

1 transaction

$3,300

LEPRINO, TERRY L.

1 transaction

$3,300

LIPSKAR, SIMON

1 transaction

$3,300

MIRMEHDI, MICHEAL

1 transaction

$3,300

NYMAN, MELISSA

1 transaction

$3,300

NYMAN, SPENCER

1 transaction

$3,300

PHELAN, DANIEL J.

1 transaction

$3,300

RICKS, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

SEABOLT, DOUG

1 transaction

$3,300

SHOTWELL, GWYNNE

1 transaction

$3,300

SMITH, JIM

2 transactions

$3,300

TAND, MOHAMMAD R.

1 transaction

$3,300

TELLIER, J. CHRISTOPHE

1 transaction

$3,300

WHEAT, ALAN D.

3 transactions

$3,300

WILLIAMS, LESLIE K.

1 transaction

$3,300

YOUNGMAN, ANDREW

1 transaction

$3,300

SMITH, PAMELA

3 transactions

$3,200

BELL, JAMES EDWARD III

2 transactions

$3,100

MISCIKOWSKI, CYNTHIA

1 transaction

$3,100

DWYER, DENIS II

2 transactions

$3,000

GOODE, CHRISTOPHER J

2 transactions

$3,000

GREENE, BARRY E.

1 transaction

$3,000

HIGGINBOTTOM, ELZIE L.

1 transaction

$3,000

HOBERMAN, ELLEN

1 transaction

$3,000

KIME, CARL

3 transactions

$3,000

KOHN, GERALD

1 transaction

$3,000

LYONS, TOM

4 transactions

$3,000

MCLAUGHLIN, BRIAN

3 transactions

$3,000

PARVEN, SCOTT

2 transactions

$3,000

STANTON, MARY BETH

2 transactions

$3,000

WIGGINS, CHANI

3 transactions

$3,000

SCHLEIN, TED

1 transaction

$2,900

TISCH, JONATHAN M.

1 transaction

$2,900

TISCH, LIZZIE

1 transaction

$2,900

BICKWIT, LEONARD JR

2 transactions

$2,800

KAPLAN, JAMES

3 transactions

$2,800

LABULA, JOSEPH

2 transactions

$2,750

DUFFORD, WILLIAM E.

5 transactions

$2,700

HERRMANN, MATTHEW

2 transactions

$2,700

KOONCE, TOM

2 transactions

$2,700

FETTIG, DWIGHT

2 transactions

$2,600

KLEIN, ISRAEL

2 transactions

$2,600

MYERS, CAROL

2 transactions

$2,600

ALSUP, WILLIAM BYRN III

1 transaction

$2,500

BLOOM, ELAINE

1 transaction

$2,500

BRITTON, JOSEPH

1 transaction

$2,500

BYERS, DAVID

2 transactions

$2,500

EBRAHIMI, MEHRAN

2 transactions

$2,500

FRYMOYER, BILL

2 transactions

$2,500

GARSON, BRETT

2 transactions

$2,500

GRESHAM, DANA

2 transactions

$2,500

100

HARRIS, JOI

1 transaction

$2,500

101

JONES, BOB

1 transaction

$2,500

102

JUDKINS, JAMES

1 transaction

$2,500

103

MCBRIDE, LINCOLN

3 transactions

$2,500

104

MILLER, ROBERT

1 transaction

$2,500

105

NORCIA, JERRY

1 transaction

$2,500

106

SMITH, MICHAEL

2 transactions

$2,500

107

VEALENCIS, JOSEPH J.

1 transaction

$2,500

108

VIEHBACHER, CHRISTOPHER

1 transaction

$2,500

109

WHITTEN, LORI

1 transaction

$2,500

110

ZIARKO, JEFF

5 transactions

$2,500

111

NELSON, MARY G.

1 transaction

$2,300

112

CAREY, STEPHEN

2 transactions

$2,200

113

FORBES, JEFFREY

2 transactions

$2,200

114

GURLEY, JOHN

1 transaction

$2,200

115

MOTTUR, AL E.

2 transactions

$2,200

116

DEWITT, CHARLIE

2 transactions

$2,100

117

KESHISHIAN, MARC D.

3 transactions

$2,100

118

POMPER, BRIAN

2 transactions

$2,100

119

SIMON, DEBORAH

1 transaction

$2,100

120

BELL, DAWN

1 transaction

$2,000

121

BOYLE, DAPHNE

2 transactions

$2,000

122

BRAMWELL, ADAM

2 transactions

$2,000

123

BUNDSCHUH, RUSSELL

2 transactions

$2,000

124

CURRIE, MARY C.

1 transaction

$2,000

125

DILLON, BRANDON

1 transaction

$2,000

126

FERGUSON, KATHLEEN

2 transactions

$2,000

127

GILL, DEREK

1 transaction

$2,000

128

HALL, JEAN

1 transaction

$2,000

129

HARRIS, SHELDON

4 transactions

$2,000

130

IRBY, WILLIAM

1 transaction

$2,000

131

KEMLER, JAMES

2 transactions

$2,000

132

KHODADOST, FATOLLAH

1 transaction

$2,000

133

KNOX, KENNETH

2 transactions

$2,000

134

KRATZ, SUSAN K.

4 transactions

$2,000

135

LASALA, BARRY

2 transactions

$2,000

136

MEEHAN, LAWRENCE

2 transactions

$2,000

137

MINGOLELLI, MICHAEL

2 transactions

$2,000

138

NAGHIPOUR, HAMIDREZA

1 transaction

$2,000

139

NAISON-PHILLIPS, ERIC

2 transactions

$2,000

140

NEMOVI, MOSTAFA

1 transaction

$2,000

141

PAPPAS, NORMAN A.

2 transactions

$2,000

142

PERRICH, DOROTHY M.

4 transactions

$2,000

143

POLESE, DONALD

1 transaction

$2,000

144

ROBINSON, ELLEN K.

2 transactions

$2,000

145

RUSH, ANDRA M.

1 transaction

$2,000

146

SLAY, BRENT L.

1 transaction

$2,000

147

SPECK, ADAM

1 transaction

$2,000

148

SPICER, TRACY B.

2 transactions

$2,000

149

TOUGH, CAROL L.

2 transactions

$2,000

150

TRIGGER, GRANT R.

2 transactions

$2,000

151

TURLEY, JERI

2 transactions

$2,000

152

WAUN, THOMAS W.

1 transaction

$2,000

153

WEINSTEIN, ANNA

2 transactions

$2,000

154

WORTH, PETER

2 transactions

$2,000

155

MICALI, MARK

3 transactions

$1,900

156

LEA, JASON

2 transactions

$1,800

157

TAYLOR, GORDON

2 transactions

$1,800

158

ARRILLAGA-ANDREESSEN, LAURA

1 transaction

$1,700

159

GUIDA, ALFONSO JR.

2 transactions

$1,700

160

HERMANOFF, SANDY M.

1 transaction

$1,700

161

HOROWITZ, FELICIA

1 transaction

$1,700

162

OBERSCHMIDT, DAVID W.

2 transactions

$1,700

163

PETERSON, CARL

2 transactions

$1,700

164

RAYMOND, LAWRENCE B.

2 transactions

$1,700

165

SILENOK, ELENA

1 transaction

$1,700

166

KAROUB, ALICE M.

2 transactions

$1,670

167

LEWIS, BILL R.

1 transaction

$1,655

168

CHEWNING, KIRK

1 transaction

$1,650

169

JOHNSON, DAVID

1 transaction

$1,650

170

ADAMS, RANDY

3 transactions

$1,500

171

ARYA, MANOOCHER

1 transaction

$1,500

172

ASSARIAN, GARY

1 transaction

$1,500

173

ATESIAN, HOWARD P.

1 transaction

$1,500

174

BALDEVIA, LORRIE

1 transaction

$1,500

175

BERMAN, ELLEN

1 transaction

$1,500

176

BERNSTEIN, MATTHEW

2 transactions

$1,500

177

BLOWER, SUSAN

2 transactions

$1,500

178

CHARLES, STEPHEN

2 transactions

$1,500

179

CHENEY, BRADFORD

2 transactions

$1,500

180

DE BOOR, CARL RAE

3 transactions

$1,500

181

EDEN, BRENT

2 transactions

$1,500

182

FAZILI, SAMIRA

1 transaction

$1,500

183

FOLEY, FRED

3 transactions

$1,500

184

JAMIAN, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,500

185

KESSINGER, JOHN

2 transactions

$1,500

186

KIM, JULIE

1 transaction

$1,500

187

KREIKEMEIER, CHAD

2 transactions

$1,500

188

KROVI, VENKATASATYA

1 transaction

$1,500

189

KURIAN, THOMAS

1 transaction

$1,500

190

LUNDE, JOHN

3 transactions

$1,500

191

MASON, MARCUS

1 transaction

$1,500

192

MCKENNA, REGIS

2 transactions

$1,500

193

MERRIGAN, JOHN A.

1 transaction

$1,500

194

POWELL, ROBERT TYLER

1 transaction

$1,500

195

ROBERTSON, DAVID

1 transaction

$1,500

196

SHOUSHANIAN, MARTIN A.

1 transaction

$1,500

197

SIDDIQUI, ARSHI

1 transaction

$1,500

198

SMITH, WALLACE

1 transaction

$1,500

199

SPIELER, NORMAN

1 transaction

$1,500

200

SUNTAG, AARON

1 transaction

$1,500

201

WILLIAMS, PETER

2 transactions

$1,500

202

GILBERT, DAN

1 transaction

$1,400

203

MITCHELL, KELLY

1 transaction

$1,400

204

WALSH, BRENDAN

2 transactions

$1,300

205

BLINDER, MADELINE

1 transaction

$1,250

206

KELLY, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,200

207

OKEEFE, PETER

1 transaction

$1,200

208

RYAN, JIMMY

1 transaction

$1,200

209

IJAZ, MUJEEB

1 transaction

$1,150

210

WHITEHORN, SAM E.

1 transaction

$1,050

211

ADAMS, C. DAN

1 transaction

$1,000

212

AMBROSE, STEVEN

1 transaction

$1,000

213

ANDERSON, KAREN

1 transaction

$1,000

214

ANDERSON, PEGGY

1 transaction

$1,000

215

ANTISHIN, DIANE

1 transaction

$1,000

216

ANTONE, N. PETER

1 transaction

$1,000

217

ASHFORD, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,000

218

BAKER, CALEB

1 transaction

$1,000

219

BARNWELL, SAM

1 transaction

$1,000

220

BASMAJIAN, ROGER

1 transaction

$1,000

221

BEHM, MICHAEL J.

1 transaction

$1,000

222

BERGEN, DON

1 transaction

$1,000

223

BIEBER, RONALD J.

1 transaction

$1,000

224

BIGGS, RAYMOND A.

1 transaction

$1,000

225

BOZZELLA, JOHN T.

1 transaction

$1,000

226

BREAUX, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,000

227

BRENEMAN, JEFFREY

1 transaction

$1,000

228

BREWER, MARK C.

1 transaction

$1,000

229

BROGAN, MICHAEL J.

1 transaction

$1,000

230

BROITMAN, ELANA

1 transaction

$1,000

231

BRUZZANO, MARCO

1 transaction

$1,000

232

BURNS, RICHARD

1 transaction

$1,000

233

BUSCHER, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,000

234

CADE, GREGORY

1 transaction

$1,000

235

CAPUANO, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$1,000

236

CHAVEZ, JOANN

1 transaction

$1,000

237

COLLINS, BARRY

1 transaction

$1,000

238

COLLINS, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,000

239

CONNORS, NORA

1 transaction

$1,000

240

COOK, DAVID A.

1 transaction

$1,000

241

COOPER, GEORGE

1 transaction

$1,000

242

DASCHLE, NATHAN

1 transaction

$1,000

243

DAUST, ROXANNE

1 transaction

$1,000

244

DEHGHAN, BEHJAT

1 transaction

$1,000

245

DELEVORYAS, NANCY

1 transaction

$1,000

246

DEMERS, RAYMOND Y.

1 transaction

$1,000

247

DININO, PAUL

1 transaction

$1,000

248

DROSTE, EDWARD

1 transaction

$1,000

249

DUCATO, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$1,000

250

ENOCH, QUINCY

1 transaction

$1,000

251

ESSERMAN, SUSAN

1 transaction

$1,000

252

FARRELL, M. BRENNAN

1 transaction

$1,000

253

FERRIBY, ROBIN

1 transaction

$1,000

254

FICK, ERIC

1 transaction

$1,000

255

FINKEL, ROBERT J.

1 transaction

$1,000

256

FINN, JAMES

1 transaction

$1,000

257

FRIEDBERG, RICHARD M.

1 transaction

$1,000

258

FROELICH, CRAIG

1 transaction

$1,000

259

GAGNON, JOHN

1 transaction

$1,000

260

GEISSINGER, ANNE

2 transactions

$1,000

261

GERRISH, CAMPBELL

2 transactions

$1,000

262

GIBBS, THOMAS

1 transaction

$1,000

263

GOODMAN, WILLIAM

1 transaction

$1,000

264

GREENBERG, RONALD

1 transaction

$1,000

265

GREENE, MARGARET E.

2 transactions

$1,000

266

GUPTA, ASHOK K.

2 transactions

$1,000

267

HAIDLE, ANDREA T.

2 transactions

$1,000

268

HALLAHAN, KATE

1 transaction

$1,000

269

HEALD, RAY

2 transactions

$1,000

270

HEYDON, PETER N.

1 transaction

$1,000

271

HILL, JOEL

1 transaction

$1,000

272

HODGES, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$1,000

273

HOLMES, JAMES M.

1 transaction

$1,000

274

HOON, PHILIP

1 transaction

$1,000

275

HORAN, TERENCE

1 transaction

$1,000

276

HOROWITZ, BARBARA

1 transaction

$1,000

277

HUSTON, BLAKE

2 transactions

$1,000

278

JAMIAN, GREGORY

1 transaction

$1,000

279

JENSEN, JESSICA

1 transaction

$1,000

280

JINGOZIAN, PAUL

1 transaction

$1,000

281

JOHNSON, ARTHUR C.

1 transaction

$1,000

282

JOHNSON, CHARLES

1 transaction

$1,000

283

JONES, JONATHON

1 transaction

$1,000

284

KAZEROUNIAN, JILA

1 transaction

$1,000

285

KEATING, PETER M.

1 transaction

$1,000

286

KESSLER, GARY

1 transaction

$1,000

287

KNISELY, EVAN

1 transaction

$1,000

288

KOH, GRACE

1 transaction

$1,000

289

KRETZSCHMAR, RICHARD

1 transaction

$1,000

290

KRIEG, MARTHA

2 transactions

$1,000

291

KUNZ, JAMES W.

1 transaction

$1,000

292

LAMPARTER, MARY

1 transaction

$1,000

293

LAMPARTER, RON

1 transaction

$1,000

294

LARSEN, DINAH

1 transaction

$1,000

295

LAUER, TREVOR P.

1 transaction

$1,000

296

LEE, DENISE M.

1 transaction

$1,000

297

LEE, PATRICK

1 transaction

$1,000

298

LINGLE, CHRISTOPHER

1 transaction

$1,000

299

LIPSEY, RACHEL

1 transaction

$1,000

300

LOVE, KIMBERLY

1 transaction

$1,000

301

LOVIN, BRANDON

1 transaction

$1,000

302

MAKI, BRETT A.

1 transaction

$1,000

303

MALARKEY, TIMOTHY

1 transaction

$1,000

304

MANLEY, RICHARD

1 transaction

$1,000

305

MANTZ, JONATHAN

1 transaction

$1,000

306

MAXFIELD, MELISSA

1 transaction

$1,000

307

MILLER, RACHEL

1 transaction

$1,000

308

MOHLER, MARGARET A.

1 transaction

$1,000

309

MONSIF, SHANNON

1 transaction

$1,000

310

MOSKWA, PATTI ANN

1 transaction

$1,000

311

MUKKAMALA, BOBBY

1 transaction

$1,000

312

MUSTIN, LINK

1 transaction

$1,000

313

NETTERFIELD, KIM

1 transaction

$1,000

314

NEWHARD, ELEANOR

1 transaction

$1,000

315

NYHOLM, ALLISON

1 transaction

$1,000

316

OGDEN, JUDITH

2 transactions

$1,000

317

OLSON, ERIK

1 transaction

$1,000

318

PAGANO, ED

1 transaction

$1,000

319

PARETSKY, SARA

1 transaction

$1,000

320

PAUL, MATTHEW T.

1 transaction

$1,000

321

PERLMUTTER, NATHAN

1 transaction

$1,000

322

PERRY, EDMUND

1 transaction

$1,000

323

PLUNKETT, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$1,000

324

PLYBON, ROBERT

1 transaction

$1,000

325

POERSCH, JENNIFER

1 transaction

$1,000

326

PRATT, EVAN

1 transaction

$1,000

327

QUINN, THOMAS H.

1 transaction

$1,000

328

RAFFAELLI, JOHN D.

1 transaction

$1,000

329

ROGERS, JOHN W. JR.

1 transaction

$1,000

330

ROLLING, MARK

1 transaction

$1,000

331

ROSOWSKI, ROBERT B.

1 transaction

$1,000

332

RUEDIGER, STEPHEN

1 transaction

$1,000

333

RUUD, DAVID S.

1 transaction

$1,000

334

RYAN, JAMES

1 transaction

$1,000

335

SARKESIAN, PETER

1 transaction

$1,000

336

SCHWIND, JEROME E.

1 transaction

$1,000

337

SHEWCRAFT, SCOTT

1 transaction

$1,000

338

SHROYER, JULIE E.

2 transactions

$1,000

339

SILVERMAN, STEPHANIE

1 transaction

$1,000

340

SIMON, NEAL S.

1 transaction

$1,000

341

SIMPSON, MICHAEL

2 transactions

$1,000

342

SINGH, JASPREET

1 transaction

$1,000

343

SIRACUSE, HELEN

1 transaction

$1,000

344

SOSNICK, SUSAN M.

2 transactions

$1,000

345

STUPAK, BART T.

1 transaction

$1,000

346

SWARTZ, STEPHEN

1 transaction

$1,000

347

TATE, DANIEL JR

1 transaction

$1,000

348

THOMAS, DAVID

1 transaction

$1,000

349

THOMAS, SAMUEL BUZZ III

1 transaction

$1,000

350

TODD, WILL

1 transaction

$1,000

351

VAN DUSEN, GEORGE

1 transaction

$1,000

352

VAN HEUVELEN, ROBERT

1 transaction

$1,000

353

VEALENCIS, JOE

1 transaction

$1,000

354

WALKER, BRAD

1 transaction

$1,000

355

WALSH, KEVIN

1 transaction

$1,000

356

WARE, MARK

1 transaction

$1,000

357

WARNER, RICHARD

1 transaction

$1,000

358

WATSON, JOHN S.

1 transaction

$1,000

359

WEBSTER, PETER

1 transaction

$1,000

360

WERNER, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$1,000

361

WEXLER, DAVID

2 transactions

$1,000

362

WILLIAMS, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$1,000

363

WINSLOW, SALLY

2 transactions

$1,000

364

WOODY, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$1,000

365

ZANGENEH, KARIM

1 transaction

$1,000

366

MATLOCK, MARK

1 transaction

$970

367

KATZ, JORDON

1 transaction

$950

368

MULLIN, PETER W.

1 transaction

$900

369

SANFORD, JOHN

1 transaction

$800

370

SCHWARTZ, ARI

1 transaction

$800

371

ADRABI, JONATHAN

1 transaction

$750

372

O'BRIEN, LAWRENCE F. III

1 transaction

$750

373

ALIX, JAY

1 transaction

$700

374

CRANWELL, WILLIAM C.

1 transaction

$700

375

BLIGHT, CATHY

1 transaction

$600

376

GALEANA, CARL

1 transaction

$600

377

MORGANROTH, MAYER W.

1 transaction

$600

378

MOSS, SIDNEY

1 transaction

$600

379

TEJRAL, AMY

1 transaction

$600

380

WESLEY, CORNELIA

1 transaction

$600

381

BHUTA, JED

1 transaction

$550

382

PAYNTER, RANN

1 transaction

$533

383

AGGARWAL, RAGHAV

1 transaction

$500

384

ALAFCHI, MOHAMMAD

1 transaction

$500

385

ALMURAISI, NAGAT

1 transaction

$500

386

ANAYA, WILLIAM

1 transaction

$500

387

ARABIA, CHERIE

1 transaction

$500

388

ARONSON, LAUREN

1 transaction

$500

389

BARENS, KRISTI

1 transaction

$500

390

BECKHUSEN, ERIC

1 transaction

$500

391

BLANKLEY, JOHN

1 transaction

$500

392

BONO, RANDALL

1 transaction

$500

393

BRADLEY, KEVIN W.

1 transaction

$500

394

BRATHWAITE, PAUL A.

1 transaction

$500

395

BRIM, REMY

1 transaction

$500

396

BROWN, CYNTHIA

1 transaction

$500

397

BURTON, STEPHEN R.

1 transaction

$500

398

CALLE, JON

1 transaction

$500

399

CAMPBELL, THOMAS

1 transaction

$500

400

CATTON, JACK

1 transaction

$500

401

CHASE, NELSON

1 transaction

$500

402

COCKRELL, ERIC

1 transaction

$500

403

COHN, ALAN

1 transaction

$500

404

COOPERMAN, JOEL

1 transaction

$500

405

CORUM, KENTON R.

1 transaction

$500

406

DABANIAN, JUDITH C.

1 transaction

$500

407

DARAKJIAN, ARA

1 transaction

$500

408

DAVIS, CHRISTOPHER

1 transaction

$500

409

DAVIS, GILBERT R.

1 transaction

$500

410

DE BURLO, C. RUSSELL

1 transaction

$500

411

DENENFELD, PAUL J.

1 transaction

$500

412

DENHAM, LORI

1 transaction

$500

413

DEOL, SATVIR

1 transaction

$500

414

DONG, TOM

1 transaction

$500

415

DRISCOLL, JERRY

1 transaction

$500

416

DROBAC, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$500

417

DUDZIK, MICHAEL

1 transaction

$500

418

DUNN, BARBARA

1 transaction

$500

419

EICHLER, EDWIN H.

1 transaction

$500

420

ELLIOTT ANDAHAZY, MORGAN

1 transaction

$500

421

EMANUEL, ADAM

1 transaction

$500

422

ERB, JUDITH L.

1 transaction

$500

423

ERVIN, FRANK W. III

1 transaction

$500

424

ESQUITH, STEPHEN

1 transaction

$500

425

EUGENE, LOVASCO

1 transaction

$500

426

EVENSON, VERNON

1 transaction

$500

427

FARRIS, RYAN

1 transaction

$500

428

FEI, ROBERT

1 transaction

$500

429

FIELDS, ANDREW

1 transaction

$500

430

FISH, GRETCHEN

1 transaction

$500

431

FORRESTER, TERRY

1 transaction

$500

432

FOSTER, BRENDA

1 transaction

$500

433

FRANK, SARA B.

1 transaction

$500

434

GARDINER, JOHN

1 transaction

$500

435

GARGARO, EUGENE A. JR

1 transaction

$500

436

GARNER, ROBERT

1 transaction

$500

437

GAZDA, ELAINE H.

1 transaction

$500

438

GENTILLE, SALLY

1 transaction

$500

439

GUZIK, JOHN

1 transaction

$500

440

HALE, ROBERT

1 transaction

$500

441

HARDISON, ROBERT

1 transaction

$500

442

HARDY, LAURA

1 transaction

$500

443

HARTWICK, SHANNEN

1 transaction

$500

444

HAYNES, SARAH

1 transaction

$500

445

HEITNER, KENNETH

1 transaction

$500

446

HETTINGER, LUKE

1 transaction

$500

447

HICKS, MATTHEW

1 transaction

$500

448

HIEBER, ERIC

1 transaction

$500

449

HOLMES, BOB

1 transaction

$500

450

HOLTZ, JUDITH A.

1 transaction

$500

451

HONNOLD, TERESA R.

1 transaction

$500

452

HOOSANG, CHRISTOPHER P.

1 transaction

$500

453

HUCK, DAVID E.

1 transaction

$500

454

HUMPHREY, LEE

1 transaction

$500

455

HURST, BRET

1 transaction

$500

456

ISRAELYAN, SOUREN

1 transaction

$500

457

JACKSON, CARLOS

1 transaction

$500

458

JENSEN, CAROL

1 transaction

$500

459

JOHNSON, CAROLYN J.

1 transaction

$500

460

JOHNSON, JEFFREY

1 transaction

$500

461

JOHNSON, SHANE

1 transaction

$500

462

JUDD, TERAN

1 transaction

$500

463

KAMENS, MARY S.

1 transaction

$500

464

KATZ, ANN F.

1 transaction

$500

465

KELLEMS, CHRISTINE

1 transaction

$500

466

KELLY, KENNETH

1 transaction

$500

467

KEZELIAN, HARRY A. III

1 transaction

$500

468

KITCHENMASTER, JOYCE

1 transaction

$500

469

KLEIN, BENJAMIN

1 transaction

$500

470

KOCHERIL, PAUL

1 transaction

$500

471

KOPELMAN, JEFFREY

1 transaction

$500

472

KOTT, JONATHAN

1 transaction

$500

473

KULHANJIAN, PAUL

1 transaction

$500

474

LAGANGA, SCOTT

1 transaction

$500

475

LAMBERT, SANDRA

1 transaction

$500

476

LARSON, MYRA

1 transaction

$500

477

LETOURNEAU, DARIN

1 transaction

$500

478

LEWIN, ANDREW

1 transaction

$500

479

LIPAR, ANDREW G.

1 transaction

$500

480

LURIE, ALEXANDER D.

1 transaction

$500

481

MA, ANA

1 transaction

$500

482

MACFARLANE, JOHN T.

1 transaction

$500

483

MAGUIRE, PATRICK

1 transaction

$500

484

MAHONY, SHEILA

1 transaction

$500

485

MAMASSIAN, GREGORY

1 transaction

$500

486

MANOCHERIAN, BERNICE

1 transaction

$500

487

MARSHALL, TIMOTHY G.

1 transaction

$500

488

MARTIN, KENNETH B.

1 transaction

$500

489

MATTESON, NORMA

1 transaction

$500

490

MATTHEWS, JANE

1 transaction

$500

491

MCCLINTOCK, JANET M.

1 transaction

$500

492

MCKEAN, KATHERINE

1 transaction

$500

493

MCKEONE, JAMES

1 transaction

$500

494

MCKIE, KEVIN

1 transaction

$500

495

MCNAMARA, PATRICK

1 transaction

$500

496

MEADE, HEATHER

1 transaction

$500

497

MELMAN, MAARTHA

1 transaction

$500

498

MICHELOTTI, ROBERT J.

1 transaction

$500

499

MILLER, DEBORAH L.

1 transaction

$500

500

MONTGOMERY, JANET

1 transaction

$500

501

MOON, LAWRENCE E.

1 transaction

$500

502

MOORE, JUDITH

1 transaction

$500

503

MOORE, MAURICE

1 transaction

$500

504

MUGAR, CAROLYN

1 transaction

$500

505

MULLEN, MIKE

1 transaction

$500

506

NARAYAN, SESHADRI

1 transaction

$500

507

NICKEL, CLAUDIA

1 transaction

$500

508

NORCROSS, JULIE

1 transaction

$500

509

NUNLEY, NICHOLAS

1 transaction

$500

510

ONEILL, MARTIN

1 transaction

$500

511

OROSZ, JOEL J.

1 transaction

$500

512

OSENBERG, THOMAS

1 transaction

$500

513

OSTRO, ZACHARY

1 transaction

$500

514

OUDSEMA, ROBERT N. JR

1 transaction

$500

515

PALMER, TIM

1 transaction

$500

516

PANDRANGI, DAMAYANTHI V.

1 transaction

$500

517

PANZA, LUCIA

1 transaction

$500

518

PERRY, DAVID

1 transaction

$500

519

PFEUFFER, SHARON

1 transaction

$500

520

PHILLIPS, MATT

1 transaction

$500

521

PHILLIPS, MATTHEW

1 transaction

$500

522

PITTLEMAN, ETHAN

1 transaction

$500

523

PITTS, LAWRENCE

1 transaction

$500

524

QUEISSER, BRAD

1 transaction

$500

525

RABEN, MARGARET MARY

1 transaction

$500

526

RANKIN, VIRGINIA

1 transaction

$500

527

RAYMOND, LISA

1 transaction

$500

528

REILLY, EDWARD

1 transaction

$500

529

REISS, BILLIE

1 transaction

$500

530

RIGGS, JIMMY W.

1 transaction

$500

531

RILEY, MICHAEL V.

1 transaction

$500

532

ROSEN, ERIC

1 transaction

$500

533

ROSENBERG, VALERIE

1 transaction

$500

534

ROSENKRANDS, MARGARET R.

1 transaction

$500

535

ROSENSTOCK, JASON

1 transaction

$500

536

ROTHSCHILD, GREGG

1 transaction

$500

537

RUBENFIRE, MELVYN

1 transaction

$500

538

SABOURIN, DONALD

1 transaction

$500

539

SALO, AMY

1 transaction

$500

540

SAMET, CYRUS

1 transaction

$500

541

SANCHEZ-MURPHY, ANTONIA

1 transaction

$500

542

SCHULZ, JEAN F.

1 transaction

$500

543

SCRIBNER, CHRIS

1 transaction

$500

544

SEARS, KINGSLEY G. JR.

1 transaction

$500

545

SEDILLO, MARY A.

1 transaction

$500

546

SENECO, FRANCIS

1 transaction

$500

547

SENECO, FRANK

1 transaction

$500

548

SIEROTY, ALAN

1 transaction

$500

549

SMITH-OLSON, DEBORAH

1 transaction

$500

550

SRIVASTAVA, AJAY

1 transaction

$500

551

STRASBERG, TREGER S.

1 transaction

$500

552

SUES, ROB

1 transaction

$500

553

TANENBAUM, JUDITH

1 transaction

$500

554

THELEN, MARK

1 transaction

$500

555

THOMPSON, BRADLEY

1 transaction

$500

556

THORNELL, PAUL

1 transaction

$500

557

TOBIN, JUDY

1 transaction

$500

558

TOLL, SHELDON

1 transaction

$500

559

TORSHIAI, GLENN

1 transaction

$500

560

TOTTY, COLLEEN

1 transaction

$500

561

TURNER, FRED

1 transaction

$500

562

VECCHIONE, PAUL

1 transaction

$500

563

VETTE, SUSAN

1 transaction

$500

564

WALDMAN, BARRY P.

1 transaction

$500

565

WALKER-MILLER, CARLA

1 transaction

$500

566

WALTER, SARAH

1 transaction

$500

567

WALTZ, MALINDA H.

1 transaction

$500

568

WEISS, JEFFREY

1 transaction

$500

569

WILCOX, JUDY

1 transaction

$500

570

WOHLLEB, MARY

1 transaction

$500

571

YURK, PAM

1 transaction

$500

572

ZAMANI, BATOOL

1 transaction

$500

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN]

ID: B001243

Top Contributors

FRIENDS OF COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY PAC

PACVIRGINIA BEACH, VA

$5,000

Apr 12, 2023

THE COGGIN GROUP

OrganizationMURFREESBORO, TN

$2,900

Mar 9, 2023

THE COGGIN GROUP

OrganizationMURFREESBORO, TN

$2,500

Mar 9, 2023

DOSS BROTHERS FARM

OrganizationLAWRENCEBURG, TN

$1,000

Apr 17, 2024

DOSS BROTHERS FARM

OrganizationLAWRENCEBURG, TN

$1,000

Mar 18, 2024

BL PARTNERS GROUP LLC

OrganizationARLINGTON, VA

$500

Mar 17, 2023

KING, RODNEY W.

SELF-EMPLOYED • ATTORNEY

IndividualGERMANTOWN, TN

$13,200

Apr 4, 2024

BEAN, BILL G.

HANNING & BEAN ENTERPRISES INC. • REAL ESTATE INVESTOR

IndividualCOLUMBIA CITY, IN

$10,000

May 1, 2024

SMITH, THOMAS

PRESCOTT INVESTORS INC. • INVESTOR

IndividualBOCA RATON, FL

$10,000

May 13, 2024

GAMBLE, KATHRYN

UNAKA CO • BUSINESS EXECUTIVE

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$9,900

Jul 15, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 52 nodes and 74 connections

Total contributions: $74

Top Donors - Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]

Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount

12 Orgs6 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.

+Defense Contractorsconfidence 0.80
Section 2(3)(A) mentions the defense industrial base as a critical sector, implying potential benefits for defense contractors through improved supply chain resilience.
+Agribusinessconfidence 0.70
Section 2(3)(F) includes agricultural supply chains as a critical sector, implying potential benefits for agribusiness through enhanced supply chain resilience.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Defense Contractors$450
from 47 contributions
- KRAMER, BETH$180
- MUNSKI, DONALD$160
- KLEIN, JUDITH$60
- KOSCIUSZEK, PAUL$50

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

21

Strong

Vector: 70%

Pages: 696-698AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill aligns strongly with Project 2025's goal of streamlining and reforming the Department of Commerce by requiring an assessment of overlapping functions, identifying duplicative duties, and recommending improvements to enhance efficiency and effectiveness in manufacturing and supply chain programs."

Key themes:Department of Commerce reformstreamlining duplicative programssupply chain resiliencemanufacturing competitivenessgovernment efficiency

— 663 — 21 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Thomas F. Gilman The Department of Commerce is charged with promoting economic growth, innovation, and competitiveness while providing the data that American businesses need to succeed. Intended to serve with clarity of purpose as the voice of business in any President’s Cabinet, the Department of Commerce has suffered from decades of regulatory capture, ideological drift, and lack of focus. One long-standing joke maintains that the department, with its lack of coherence, is a holding company for the parts of the federal government that could not be housed elsewhere. Thus, in the 1990s, calls emerged to abolish the department and either spin off, zero-out, or consolidate its functions among other entities.1 At the same time, the department has a higher profile now than perhaps ever in its history. It possesses key tools to address decades of poor decision-making in Washington and is central to any plan to reverse the precipitous economic decline sparked by the Biden Administration and to counter Communist China. Both assertions can be equally true, that the department possesses the expertise, programs, and authorities that will be crucial to the success of a conservative presidency and that its role in the federal bureaucracy would benefit from streamlining and reform. Many programs at the Department of Commerce overlap in whole or part with other governmental programs, and consolidating and streamlining these could increase both accountability and return on taxpayer investment. Any exercise in government-wide budgeting and reform should review the department with an eye toward consolidation, elimination, or privatization that examines the efficiency, effectiveness, and underlying philosophy of each individual component. Though — 664 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise not an exhaustive set of proposals, the next conservative President should con- sider whether: l The International Trade Administration (ITA) and parts of the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) should be streamlined and moved to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), along with the Development Finance Corporation; the U.S. Trade and Development Agency; the Export– Import Bank; and other trade-related programs spread across the federal government—as well as considering whether many of these programs should exist within the federal government; l The Economic Development Administration’s grant programs, which are among a broad set of duplicative and overlapping federal economic development grant programs, should be consolidated with other programs and/or eliminated; l The Bureau of Economic Analysis and Census Bureau, as well as the Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, should be consolidated into a more manageable, focused, and efficient statistical agency; l The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) should be made into a performance-based organization under the Office of Management and Budget (OMB); l Alternatively, the USPTO should be consolidated with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in a new U.S. Office of Patents, Trademarks, and Standards, with all non-mission-critical research functions eliminated or moved to other, more focused, federal agencies; and l The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) should be dismantled and many of its functions eliminated, sent to other agencies, privatized, or placed under the control of states and territories. Almost every element of the department can be viewed through this lens, but with today’s political reality and multiple competing congressional committee jurisdictions, drastic structural change to the department is neither imminent nor likely. Thus, this chapter largely accepts the baseline of today’s department and proposes a bold, but achievable, set of proposals for an incoming conservative Administration. Whatever the imperfections of the Department of Commerce, it is blessed with many quality civil servants and strong statutory authorities that, directed properly,

Department of Defense

Strong

Vector: 69%

Pages: 128-130AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on improving Department of Commerce programs for supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation, which directly supports the Project 2025 goals of strengthening the defense industrial base, promoting domestic production, and enhancing coordination to boost manufacturing competitiveness."

Key themes:supply chain resiliencemanufacturing innovationdomestic production/onshoringindustrial base strengtheninginteragency coordination

— 96 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise relevant. This allows the acquisition community to focus on portfolio management and move money around more easily instead of being locked into inflexible, multiyear procurement cycles. 2. The President should examine the recommendations of the congressionally mandated Commission on Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution Reform4 and develop a strategy for implementing those that the Administration considers to be in the best interests of the American people. The commission’s final report is due on September 1, 2023. 3. Develop legislation or other means of providing funding outside the traditional PPBE process for the prototyping and experimentation of emerging technologies that are deemed essential to modernization and future conflict. Consider creating a “fast track” for projects that satisfy the most pressing national security needs. 4. Require the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Under Secretary for Research and Engineering, and all service secretaries to conduct “Night Court” and use existing authorities to terminate outdated or underperforming programs so that money can be used for what works and will work. Require the Under Secretaries and service secretaries to brief the Secretary annually on the results. 5. Require the Office of the Secretary of Defense to research and report on the acquisition processes used by America’s adversaries to improve our understanding of how they are often able to innovate and field new technologies on a faster timeline. l Strengthen America’s defense industrial base. 1. Replenish and maintain U.S. stockpiles of ammunition and other equipment that have been depleted as a result of U.S. support to Ukraine. This will strengthen the defense industry supply chain and ensure that adequate inventory exists if it is needed for a future conflict. 2. Collaborate with industry to develop a prioritized list of reforms that the DOD and Congress can enact and implement to incentivize industry to help America’s military innovate and field needed capabilities. — 97 — Department of Defense 3. Strengthen the ability of acquisition authorities to engage in multiyear procurements and block buys. This will improve private-sector rates of return, thereby incentivizing defense contractors to partner with the government. It will also reduce government overhead by reducing the number of procurement competitions. 4. Prioritize the U.S. and allies under the “domestic end product” and “domestic components” requirements of the Build America, Buy America Act.5 Currently, defense companies are required to manufacture defense items for the U.S. government that are 100 percent domestically produced and at least 50 percent composed of domestically produced components. However, there are loopholes that allow companies to manufacture these items overseas. This can create supply chain and other issues, especially in wartime. Manufacturing components and end products domestically and with allies spurs factory development, increases American jobs, and builds resilience in America’s defense industrial base. 5. Review the sectors currently prioritized for onshoring or “friendshoring” of manufacturing (kinetic capabilities, castings and forgings, critical materials, microelectronics, space, and electric vehicle batteries); evaluate them according to the strategic landscape; and expand or reprioritize the list as appropriate. 6. Help small businesses to become medium-size and large vendors, which encourages a more resilient industrial base and fosters competition. Encourage and plan for durable supply chains for small businesses so they also have commercial/private-sector customers and are not solely dependent on defense orders, which can be highly specialized, expensive, and irregular. 7. Increase external engagement among small businesses to inform them of DOD’s needs and how they could work with DOD to meet national security priorities. l Optimize the DOD acquisition community. 1. Create incentives to emphasize speed and agility in decision-making for prototyping and program-of-record starts and terminations. Most bureaucrats would rather follow a checklist and fail than go outside the procedures and win because failure means negative

Small Business Administration

Moderate

Vector: 68%

Pages: 789-791AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 SBA section aim to strengthen domestic manufacturing, particularly for small manufacturers, and improve federal support mechanisms. However, the bill focuses on Department of Commerce program coordination and reporting, while the Project 2025 policy emphasizes SBA loan and investment reforms, resulting in only moderate thematic overlap."

Key themes:manufacturing supportsmall business manufacturingsupply chain resiliencefederal program improvementcapital access (implicit)

— 756 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Domestic Manufacturing and Small Business. Small businesses in the manufacturing sector face shortfalls in access to capital.61 As manufacturing employment, domestic business investment, and non–information technology output have declined,62 expectations for market returns and the capital available to small manufacturing enterprises have diminished. This is especially true for capital-intensive sectors like transportation and energy that require large up-front investments and relatively lower-margin sectors like plastics, textiles, furniture, and agriculture. Yet these industries and others like them traditionally have been the backbone of American manufacturing employment. They also are sources of self-sufficiency and resilience at a time when global supply chains are increas- ingly uncertain. The public policy problems that are caused by declining small manufacturing are especially acute when it comes to the production of advanced technologies. Other agencies and programs invest immense taxpayer resources in basic science and research. Over time, that research results in some breakthrough technologies, but when it is time to put these breakthroughs into practice by manufacturing goods and services, much of the necessary productive capacity is offshore.63 For many technologies, the American economy lacks the capacity to “scale up” inno- vations that might not be immediately profitable. Instead, those technologies are put into practice abroad. In this way, foreign companies and foreign productive sites buy and implement taxpayer-funded American technologies. The SBA’s existing programs should be reformed to expand the private market for capital in small-manufacturer expansion. The next Administration should: l Ask Congress to make available a category of Section 7(a) loans with a larger available principal that is used to finance manufacturing facility construction and equipment upgrading. The proposed SBA Reauthorization and Improvement Act of 2019, for example, would have increased the maximum loan principal to $50 million for advanced manufacturing construction and upgrading.64 The Section 7(a) loan program operates through private lenders and guarantees a portion of private-sector loans made to qualifying small businesses. The maximum principal available is $5 million, but small businesses in capital-intensive sectors require significantly larger amounts of capital to finance up-front capital costs. l Reform the Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) program to refocus its support on small businesses rather than technology startups only. The SBIC program operates through private venture capital and private equity funds by providing eligible funds with guaranteed debt financing to support investments in small businesses. However, the program — 757 — Small Business Administration largely duplicates private-sector venture capital to the extent that the sector receiving much of its support is software and information technology, which already receive the lion’s share of venture capital investment.65 In addition, Congress should reform the SBIC program to make its financing more favorable to capital-intense investments and small manufacturers. The Health, Economic Assistance, Liability Protection, and Schools (HEALS) Act, introduced in 2020,66 and American Innovation and Manufacturing Act, introduced in 2021,67 would allow SBIC to offer longer-term financing to manufacturers and make the program more fiscally sustainable. Small-Business Size Standard Modernization. Many small-business pro- grams both inside and outside the SBA use the SBA’s definition of “small business.” Under the Small Business Act, the SBA is tasked with defining what counts as a small business and ensuring that the definition varies from industry to industry to reflect differences in regular size by industry. However, the SBA’s small-business size standards reflect a one-size-fits-all approach under which all businesses within its size standard are considered small businesses for all eligible purposes, from gov- ernment contracting preferences to eligibility for SBA loans through private banks. At the same time, the SBA is an outlier among competing economies in not considering medium-sized enterprises along with small businesses, often referred to collectively as small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Medium-sized and regional businesses are increasingly critical to maintaining competition. The next Administration should: l Encourage Congress to create a “medium-sized business” classification with its eligibility for programs confined to access to capital programs from projects for which credit elsewhere does not exist. SBA POLICY PRIORITIES FOR 2025 AND BEYOND Legislation. The new Administration can support SBA reform legislation pro- posed in Congress that aligns with key measures outlined in this chapter. It also can support legislative initiatives that would help SBA to focus on its core statutory activities such as capital access, federal contracting opportunities, and regulatory advocacy. For example: l The IMPROVE the SBA Act68 would strengthen accountability, transparency, and oversight of the SBA and aligns with many of the reforms outlined in this chapter.

21

Moderate

Vector: 68%

Pages: 696-698AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill shares Project 2025's goal of improving Department of Commerce efficiency and reducing duplication, but it focuses on a study of specific programs rather than implementing the broader structural reforms (e.g., moving ITA to USTR, consolidating grant programs, or overhauling statistical agencies) advocated in Project 2025."

Key themes:Department of Commerce efficiencyreducing duplicationcoordination improvementsupply chain resiliencemanufacturing innovation

— 664 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise not an exhaustive set of proposals, the next conservative President should con- sider whether: l The International Trade Administration (ITA) and parts of the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) should be streamlined and moved to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), along with the Development Finance Corporation; the U.S. Trade and Development Agency; the Export– Import Bank; and other trade-related programs spread across the federal government—as well as considering whether many of these programs should exist within the federal government; l The Economic Development Administration’s grant programs, which are among a broad set of duplicative and overlapping federal economic development grant programs, should be consolidated with other programs and/or eliminated; l The Bureau of Economic Analysis and Census Bureau, as well as the Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, should be consolidated into a more manageable, focused, and efficient statistical agency; l The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) should be made into a performance-based organization under the Office of Management and Budget (OMB); l Alternatively, the USPTO should be consolidated with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in a new U.S. Office of Patents, Trademarks, and Standards, with all non-mission-critical research functions eliminated or moved to other, more focused, federal agencies; and l The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) should be dismantled and many of its functions eliminated, sent to other agencies, privatized, or placed under the control of states and territories. Almost every element of the department can be viewed through this lens, but with today’s political reality and multiple competing congressional committee jurisdictions, drastic structural change to the department is neither imminent nor likely. Thus, this chapter largely accepts the baseline of today’s department and proposes a bold, but achievable, set of proposals for an incoming conservative Administration. Whatever the imperfections of the Department of Commerce, it is blessed with many quality civil servants and strong statutory authorities that, directed properly, — 665 — Department of Commerce can help ensure U.S. success in 2025 and beyond. With that in mind, this chapter focuses primarily on policy, strategy, and occasionally tactics that are either imme- diately implementable under strong leadership or are critical to mission success. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY The Office of the Secretary (OS) is somewhat of a misnomer, as very few of the thousands of employees working in the office are dedicated to staffing the secretary and implementing Administration priorities. Rather, OS’s budget and full-time equivalents have increasingly been allocated to fulfill financial, human resources, administrative, information technology, contracting, and facilities functions, using outdated and inefficient systems. The Trump Administration began implement- ing key changes, such as updating financial management tools, but more must be done to digitize and modernize the department’s processes to free resources for secretarial and presidential priorities. The above drain on resources leaves the Secretary of Commerce to rely upon a few dozen direct support staff, supplemented with detailees and indirect fund- ing from each of the bureaus to execute the President’s agenda and manage the diverse functions of the department. This structure empowers career staff in each bureau and makes it harder to mandate change. As such, it is vitally important that an incoming Administration fully staff OS with political appointees, send all existing detailees back to their home bureaus on Day One, and replace those detailees with trusted and knowledgeable career staff on an as-needed basis. Department of Commerce leadership should also fight to restore direct fund- ing and additional political appointee positions to OS and its constituent parts involved in implementing and communicating the Commerce Secretary’s and President’s policy priorities. Administration, Budget, and Appropriations. Recent practice has been for career staff to serve as gatekeepers between department leadership and external budget and appropriations partners at the OMB and on Capitol Hill. By serving not just as a central point of contact but as the sole staff-level communicators of departmental priorities, these career officials can, have, and will slow down—and even stop—changes in policy, even at the line-office level. Although the following is true at all agencies, it is particularly important at the Department of Commerce that political leadership be immediately installed at the Office of the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Assistant Secretary for Administra- tion (ASA), and that political appointees receive a mandate to communicate with external partners alongside career staff at every stage of the budget and appropri- ations process. Political appointees must also monitor internal CFO operations down to the operating division level to ensure that funds are not being diverted to programs that do not align with Administration priorities, as has regularly hap- pened in years past.

21

Weak

Vector: 68%

Pages: 699-701AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 section aim to improve Department of Commerce effectiveness, but the bill focuses on supply chain resilience and manufacturing innovation coordination, while Project 2025 emphasizes trade enforcement, AD/CVD processes, and China-related policies, resulting only in tangential overlap."

Key themes:Department of Commerceoperational efficiencymanufacturing supporttrade enforcement

— 667 — Department of Commerce Day One to ensure the bureau is fully implementing Administration policy. An incoming Administration should ensure that Assistant Secretary and Deputy Assis- tant Secretary positions are staffed by appointees as quickly as possible. Enforcement and Compliance. Strong enforcement of trade agreements is an indispensable function of the ITA carried out by Enforcement & Compliance (E&C). Free and fair trade is impossible without energetic enforcement of exist- ing agreements and without strong defense against dumping and illegal subsidies. Many free trade advocates consider antidumping and countervailing duty laws (AD/CVD) to be protectionist and thus antithetical to the conservative free market position. In their view, AD/CVD laws are overused, abused by certain industries, and harmful to American economic competitiveness by increasing costs to down- stream industries. Other conservatives maintain that AD/CVD tariffs are not conventional tariffs, but rather corrective actions meant to address anti-free market activities by other governments—a scalpel, not a hammer. In the short term, this may mean higher costs for U.S. businesses and consumers on a limited number of products from cer- tain offending countries, but those higher prices correct existing price distortions in the marketplace and ultimately ensure the healthy operation of market forces in the long term and a level playing field for U.S. manufacturers. Whatever the case, improvements to the current system must be made to both protect U.S. consumers and companies from improperly applied duties and defend against trade-distorting actions by other governments. Procedures governing the day-to-day administration of proceedings, as well as policies driving critical deci- sions in proceedings, require a fresh look. Ultimately, E&C’s mandate is to conduct a rigorous but also fair, objective, and balanced review of the record in each pro- ceeding and to make decisions without bias. It is exceedingly unlikely that Congress would abolish or limit the activity of E&C. Therefore, the proposals below are made under the assumption that an incoming Administration will operate E&C within its current legal, institutional, and political confines and set a path forward to wield E&C’s considerable power to achieve the goals of a conservative Administration. These proposals can be broken into three categories: process, policy, and addressing China. Process l Re-establish and expand suspended in-person pandemic-related verifications, particularly regarding the People’s Republic of China. Ensure that verifications are rigorous. l Implement advanced analytics and artificial intelligence to identify opportunities for self-initiation, detect circumvention, and prevent bad actors from gaming the system. — 668 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Accelerate front-end work on reviews as opposed to constantly pushing against statutory deadlines. l Work with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and other relevant agencies to address circumvention and duty evasion, and promote policies that encourage full duty collection to ensure the integrity of AD/CVD and circumvention orders. l Work with CBP, the Department of Justice, the Department of Treasury, and other relevant agencies to aggressively pursue importers of record and other beneficiaries for unpaid duties, and consider policy changes to reduce uncollected duties in the future. l Work, pursuant to the above, with interagency partners in AD/CVD cases to either require foreign importers of record (IORs) to make cash deposits far in excess of established duty rates at the time of entry of AD/CVD merchandise, require IORs to register sufficient U.S. assets to ensure timely payment of duties, or otherwise prohibit IORs from importing AD/CVD merchandise. l Conduct a regulatory capture audit and put guardrails in place to address improper exercise of bureaucratic prerogative. Policy l Ensure senior policy and decision-making positions are always held by political appointees. l Reverse the practice of giving the benefit of the doubt to foreign companies versus U.S. companies in AD/CVD proceedings. l Establish a policy for addressing companies that invest heavily in the U.S. and thus have large import volumes, exposing them to AD/CVD petitions. l Establish an effective, fair, and objective process for self-initiation of AD/ CVD proceedings when industry lacks the resources or ability to act. Addressing China l Revive the China-specific non-market economy unit. l Provide transparency in the surrogate country list development process.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Peters, Gary C.

Extending Expired Cybersecurity Authorities Act

119/s/2983

Satellite Cybersecurity Act of 2025

119/s/3404

Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act

119/s/97

Back to All Bills