Satellite Cybersecurity Act of 2025
Download PDFSponsored by
Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]
ID: P000595
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
April 13, 2026
Introduced
Committee Review
Floor Action
📍 Current Status
Next: The full Senate will vote on whether to pass the bill.
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The Satellite Cybersecurity Act of 2025 is a perfect example of how politicians can take a legitimate concern – in this case, the cybersecurity of commercial satellite systems – and turn it into a bloated, self-serving exercise in bureaucratic navel-gazing.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to require a report on federal support for the cybersecurity of commercial satellite systems. Because, you know, what we really need is another report to add to the already towering pile of useless paperwork generated by our esteemed lawmakers. The report will allegedly assess the effectiveness of federal efforts to address cybersecurity risks and threats to commercial satellite systems, as well as identify areas for improvement.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes a "clearinghouse" for commercial satellite system cybersecurity information, because who doesn't love a good clearinghouse? It also defines various terms, such as "commercial satellite system," "critical infrastructure," and "cybersecurity risk," because our lawmakers apparently need help understanding basic concepts. The Department of Commerce is tasked with coordinating the development of this clearinghouse, because they clearly have nothing better to do.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include commercial satellite system operators, federal agencies, and – of course – the lobbying firms that will inevitably benefit from this bill. The stakeholders are anyone who uses satellite technology, which is pretty much everyone in the modern world. But let's be real, the only people who will actually care about this bill are the ones who stand to gain financially or politically from its passage.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is negligible, except for the fact that it will create a new layer of bureaucratic red tape and provide a fresh opportunity for pork-barrel spending. The implications are clear: our lawmakers are more interested in posturing and grandstanding than in actually addressing the real cybersecurity threats facing our nation. This bill is a symptom of a deeper disease – the corruption, cowardice, and stupidity that pervades our political system.
In conclusion, the Satellite Cybersecurity Act of 2025 is a farce, a sham, and a waste of taxpayer dollars. It's a classic example of how our lawmakers can take a legitimate concern and turn it into a self-serving exercise in bureaucratic navel-gazing. So, let's all just sit back, relax, and enjoy the spectacle of our politicians pretending to care about cybersecurity while they line their pockets with lobbying cash.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]
ID: C001056
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 23 nodes and 33 connections
Total contributions: $226,947
Top Donors - Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]
Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount
Industry Impact
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.
- +Telecommunications confidence 0.90
The bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to develop a commercial satellite system cybersecurity clearinghouse and consolidate voluntary cybersecurity recommendations, which benefits telecommunications companies that operate commercial satellite systems by providing resources and guidance to improve cybersecurity (Sec. 4(b)-(c)).
- +Defense Contractors confidence 0.80
The bill involves coordination with the Department of Defense and other agencies on cybersecurity of commercial satellite systems, which may benefit defense contractors that provide satellite-related services or systems through potential contracts or collaboration (Sec. 3(c)(4), Sec. 4(d)(2), Sec. 5).
Who funds the sponsor on these industries
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]) received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
Industries this bill HELPS
- Telecommunications$1,980from 50contributions
- MAXFIELD, MELISSA$1,000
- ARABIA, CHERIE$500
- WILLIAMSON, KATHY$480
- from 47contributions
- KRAMER, BETH$180
- MUNSKI, DONALD$160
- KLEIN, JUDITH$60
- KOSCIUSZEK, PAUL$50
Project 2025 Policy Matches
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.
Introduction
AI Analysis:
"The Satellite Cybersecurity Act of 2025 aligns with Project 2025's objective to advance America's space leadership by enhancing the cybersecurity of commercial satellite systems, which is crucial for maintaining U.S. competitiveness in the space industry. The bill's focus on improving information sharing and coordination among federal agencies also resonates with Project 2025's emphasis on holding government accountable and eliminating wasteful spending."
— 855 — Federal Communications Commission so a new Administration should redouble efforts to require timely reviews and final actions by agencies with jurisdiction over federal lands, including the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service. l Advance America’s space leadership. One of the most significant technological developments of the past few years has been the emergence of a new generation of low-earth orbit satellites like StarLink and Kuiper. This technology can beam a reliable, high-speed Internet signal to nearly any part of the globe at a fraction of the cost of other technologies. This has the potential to significantly accelerate efforts to end the digital divide and disrupt the federal regulatory and subsidy regime that applies to communications networks. The FCC should expedite its work to support this new technology by acting more quickly in its review and approval of applications to launch new satellites. Otherwise, the U.S. risks ceding space leadership to entities based in countries with more friendly regulatory environments. Holding Government Accountable. Federal technology and telecommunica- tions programs have been plagued by a troubling lack of accountability and good governance. They would benefit from stronger oversight and a fresh look at elim- inating outdated regulations that are doing more harm than good. l End wasteful broadband spending policies. Many of the broadband spending policies being pursued by the current Administration are poised to waste taxpayer money while leaving rural communities and unconnected Americans behind. At the same time, the dramatic recent increases in funding through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act mean that the federal government has more than enough resources to meet its broadband connectivity goals. Congress should therefore hold the agencies accountable so that taxpayer money is used effectively to promote broadband connectivity across the nation. To that end, the next Administration should instruct the various departments and agencies that are administering broadband infrastructure funds to direct those resources to communities without adequate Internet infrastructure instead of to places that already enjoy broadband connectivity. Take, for example, the final rules that the Treasury Department adopted in 2022 that govern the expenditure of $350 billion in ARPA funds. Rather than directing those dollars to the rural and other communities that have no Internet infrastructure, the current — 856 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Administration gave the green light for recipients to spend those funds to overbuild existing high-speed networks in communities that already have multiple broadband providers. A new Administration should eliminate government-funded overbuilding of existing networks. l Adopt a national coordinating strategy. Hundreds of billions of infrastructure dollars have been appropriated by Congress or budgeted by agencies over the past couple of years that can be used to end the digital divide. Yet, according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, “U.S. broadband efforts are not guided by a national strategy”; instead, “[f]ederal broadband efforts are fragmented and overlapping, with more than 100 programs administered by 15 agencies,” risking overbuilding as well as wasteful duplication.26 Many of these programs remain plagued by inefficiency, further contributing to waste of limited taxpayer dollars. Moreover, the federal government is failing to put appropriate guardrails in place to govern the expenditure of billions in broadband funds. This is the regulatory equivalent of turning the spigot on full blast and then walking away from the hose. There is a worrisome lack of adequate tracking, measurement, and accountability standards governing all of this broadband spending. As a result, we are likely to see headline levels of waste, fraud, and abuse. A new Administration needs to bring fresh oversight to this spending and put a national strategy in place to ensure that the federal government adopts a coordinated approach to its various broadband initiatives. Similarly, the next Administration should ask the FCC to launch a review of its existing broadband programs, including the different components of the USF, with the goal of avoiding duplication, improving efficiency of existing programs, and saving taxpayer money. l Correct the FCC’s regulatory trajectory and encourage competition to improve connectivity. The FCC is a New Deal–era agency. Its history of regulation tends to reflect the view that the federal government should impose heavy-handed regulation rather than relying on competition and market forces to produce optimal outcomes. President Franklin D. Roosevelt recommended that Congress create the FCC in February 1934 for the purposes of establishing “a single Government agency charged with broad authority” over the field of communications.27 Congress subsequently established the FCC through the Communications Act of 1934. Congress has passed a number of additional statutes—some broad, some
Introduction
AI Analysis:
"The Satellite Cybersecurity Act of 2025 aligns with Project 2025's objective to advance America's space leadership by enhancing the cybersecurity of commercial satellite systems, which is crucial for maintaining U.S. competitiveness in the space industry. The bill's focus on improving cybersecurity and information sharing among stakeholders directly supports the policy's goal of promoting U.S. leadership in space technology."
— 855 — Federal Communications Commission so a new Administration should redouble efforts to require timely reviews and final actions by agencies with jurisdiction over federal lands, including the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service. l Advance America’s space leadership. One of the most significant technological developments of the past few years has been the emergence of a new generation of low-earth orbit satellites like StarLink and Kuiper. This technology can beam a reliable, high-speed Internet signal to nearly any part of the globe at a fraction of the cost of other technologies. This has the potential to significantly accelerate efforts to end the digital divide and disrupt the federal regulatory and subsidy regime that applies to communications networks. The FCC should expedite its work to support this new technology by acting more quickly in its review and approval of applications to launch new satellites. Otherwise, the U.S. risks ceding space leadership to entities based in countries with more friendly regulatory environments. Holding Government Accountable. Federal technology and telecommunica- tions programs have been plagued by a troubling lack of accountability and good governance. They would benefit from stronger oversight and a fresh look at elim- inating outdated regulations that are doing more harm than good. l End wasteful broadband spending policies. Many of the broadband spending policies being pursued by the current Administration are poised to waste taxpayer money while leaving rural communities and unconnected Americans behind. At the same time, the dramatic recent increases in funding through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act mean that the federal government has more than enough resources to meet its broadband connectivity goals. Congress should therefore hold the agencies accountable so that taxpayer money is used effectively to promote broadband connectivity across the nation. To that end, the next Administration should instruct the various departments and agencies that are administering broadband infrastructure funds to direct those resources to communities without adequate Internet infrastructure instead of to places that already enjoy broadband connectivity. Take, for example, the final rules that the Treasury Department adopted in 2022 that govern the expenditure of $350 billion in ARPA funds. Rather than directing those dollars to the rural and other communities that have no Internet infrastructure, the current
About These Correlations
Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.