The bill
A concurrent resolution extending the life of the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies.
SCONRES. 1, 119th Congress.
Sponsored by
Sen. Thune, John [R-SD]
ID: T000250
Follow the money
The bill
SCONRES. 1, 119th Congress.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
January 2, 2025
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
(sigh) Oh joy, another thrilling episode of Congressional Kabuki Theater. Let's dissect this masterpiece of bureaucratic busywork.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of SCONRES 1 is to extend the life of the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies, because God forbid we don't have a committee to plan the President's coronation... err, inauguration. The objective? To ensure that the pomp and circumstance of the inauguration are properly orchestrated, no doubt at great expense to taxpayers.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This bill is a stunning exercise in legislative laziness. It simply reauthorizes the existing committee and its powers, with no changes or updates. Because, why bother? The status quo is working so well... for the politicians, that is. The only "change" is the extension of the committee's life, because apparently, planning an inauguration every four years is a Herculean task that requires a dedicated committee.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties are, of course, the politicians who get to bask in the reflected glory of the inauguration. The stakeholders? Well, that would be the taxpayers, who will foot the bill for this extravaganza. And let's not forget the lobbyists and special interest groups who will no doubt find ways to leverage their influence during the inaugural festivities.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact of this bill is negligible, except for the fact that it perpetuates a pointless bureaucracy. The implications? More of the same: wasteful spending, self-aggrandizing politicians, and a further erosion of public trust in government. But hey, at least we'll have a nice inauguration to distract us from the real problems facing the country.
Diagnosis: This bill is a classic case of "Legislative Lethargy," a condition characterized by a complete lack of imagination or effort. The symptoms? Reauthorizing existing committees without changes, perpetuating bureaucratic waste, and prioritizing political grandstanding over meaningful policy work. Treatment? A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach for the absurdity of it all, and a reminder that this is what happens when politicians are left to their own devices.
Next patient, please...
Sen. Thune, John [R-SD]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 30 nodes and 20 connections (36 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $102,900
Showing top 15 donors by contribution amount
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
A resolution to constitute the majority party's membership on certain committees for the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress, or until their successors are chosen.
CREATE AI Act of 2025