A resolution supporting the goals of International Women's Day.

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/sres/106

Last Updated: May 14, 2025

A resolution supporting the goals of International Women's Day.

SRES. 106, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$72,850 raised

21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of State" section, p. 232-235 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 58.

April 27, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The trivialities of congressional resolutions. Let's dissect the substance, or rather, the lack thereof.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This resolution is a feel-good exercise, supporting the goals of International Women's Day. It's a symbolic gesture, devoid of any concrete policy changes or meaningful action. The objectives are vague and focused on promoting women's empowerment, peace, and security – noble causes, but hardly relevant to my interests.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** There are no significant provisions or changes to existing law in this resolution. It's a non-binding statement of support, reiterating the importance of women's participation in peace negotiations and conflict prevention. The language is aspirational, not prescriptive. In other words, it's all talk and no action.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties are primarily women and girls globally, particularly those living in countries affected by conflict or humanitarian crises. However, the resolution's impact on my business interests is negligible. I'm more concerned with the potential implications of future legislation that might arise from this resolution, such as increased regulations or quotas that could affect my operations.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this resolution is limited to raising awareness and promoting a symbolic commitment to women's empowerment. However, if this resolution were to be followed by more substantive legislation, it could have implications for businesses like mine. For instance, increased regulations or quotas aimed at promoting diversity and inclusion could lead to additional compliance costs and bureaucratic hurdles.

From my perspective, the real issue is not the advancement of women's rights but rather the potential for overregulation and inefficient allocation of resources. As a visionary entrepreneur, I prioritize innovation and efficiency over feel-good initiatives. The government should focus on creating an environment that fosters entrepreneurship and growth, rather than indulging in symbolic gestures.

In conclusion, this resolution is a non-event from a business perspective. However, it's essential to monitor the legislative landscape for potential future developments that could impact my interests. As always, I'll be prepared to adapt and navigate any changes that may arise, ensuring that my empire continues to thrive in an ever-evolving regulatory environment.

**Projected Impact on My Business:** Minimal to none

**Recommendations:**

1. Monitor the legislative landscape for potential future developments related to women's empowerment and diversity initiatives. 2. Engage with think tanks and advocacy groups to shape policy discussions and ensure that any future legislation aligns with my business interests. 3. Continue to prioritize innovation, efficiency, and growth in my operations, regardless of symbolic gestures from Congress.

**Estimated Cost Savings:** $0 (this resolution has no tangible impact on my business)

**Projected Revenue Growth:** Unchanged (this resolution does not affect my revenue streams)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this resolution, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a resolution is a type of legislative measure that expresses the opinion or sentiment of one or both chambers of Congress.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The main purpose of SRES 106 is to support the goals of International Women's Day. The resolution aims to promote women's empowerment and equality globally, particularly in areas such as education, economic participation, and peace negotiations. It also seeks to address issues like child marriage, violence against women, and limited access to healthcare.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

This resolution doesn't propose any changes to existing law; it's more of a symbolic gesture. However, it does reference the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017, which requires the government to develop a strategy to promote women's participation in peace negotiations and conflict prevention.

The resolution also mentions the United States Strategy and National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security, which recognizes the importance of addressing inequities faced by women in achieving national security priorities. It's worth noting that this plan is not a law, but rather an executive branch initiative.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The affected parties include:

* Women and girls globally, particularly those living in countries with high rates of child marriage, violence against women, and limited access to education and healthcare. * The United States government, which has committed to promoting women's empowerment and equality through various international initiatives. * International organizations like the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women) and UNICEF.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

While this resolution doesn't have any direct policy implications, it serves as a statement of intent from Congress to prioritize women's empowerment and equality globally. It may also influence future legislative initiatives or executive branch actions related to these issues.

In theory, if the United States government takes concrete steps to address the issues highlighted in this resolution, it could lead to positive outcomes such as increased access to education and healthcare for women and girls, reduced rates of child marriage and violence against women, and more inclusive peace negotiations. However, without concrete policy changes or funding commitments, this resolution remains largely symbolic.

Remember when we learned about the importance of checks and balances in 8th grade civics? This resolution is a prime example of how Congress can express its opinion on an issue without necessarily taking concrete action. It's up to the executive branch to turn these sentiments into policy reality.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on SRES 106, and it's a doozy. This resolution is all about supporting the goals of International Women's Day, but don't be fooled – there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** On the surface, this bill seems like a feel-good measure, promoting women's rights and empowerment worldwide. But dig deeper, and you'll find that it's actually about advancing U.S. foreign policy interests under the guise of feminism. The real objective is to promote American values and influence global governance.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill reaffirms the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017, which requires a government-wide strategy to promote women's participation in peace negotiations and conflict prevention. It also references the U.S. Strategy and National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security, dated October 2023. But what's not explicitly stated is how this will be implemented or funded.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Women and girls worldwide are the apparent beneficiaries of this resolution. However, I'd argue that the real stakeholders are the U.S. government, multinational corporations, and NGOs pushing for a more "inclusive" global agenda. This bill serves as a Trojan horse for Western values and interests to be imposed on developing countries.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact will be twofold. On one hand, it may lead to increased funding for women's empowerment programs and initiatives, which could have positive effects. On the other hand, this resolution might be used as a pretext for further U.S. interventionism in foreign affairs, under the guise of promoting "women's rights." It could also create new opportunities for NGOs and corporations to profit from these initiatives.

Now, I know what you're thinking – "Uncle, why are you being so paranoid?" But let me tell you, folks, there's always more to the story than meets the eye. This bill is just another example of how our government uses feel-good rhetoric to advance its own agenda. Wake up, sheeple!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Outraged tone) Folks, we've got another doozy of a bill on our hands, courtesy of the liberal elites in Congress. SRES 106, supporting the goals of International Women's Day, is just a Trojan horse for globalist agendas and feminist ideologies that threaten American values.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This resolution is nothing but a feel-good exercise, pretending to promote women's rights and empowerment worldwide. But let's be real, it's all about advancing the liberal agenda of "equality" and "social justice." The bill's main objective is to virtue-signal to the international community that we care about women's issues, while ignoring the real problems facing American women.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution cites various statistics on women's rights and empowerment, but it doesn't actually change any existing laws or policies. It's just a symbolic gesture, meant to appease the feminist lobby and international organizations like the UN. The bill also references previous legislation, such as the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017, which is just more evidence of the deep state's efforts to undermine American sovereignty.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This resolution affects women worldwide, but let's be honest, it's really about advancing the interests of liberal elites and globalist organizations. The bill mentions various UN agencies, NGOs, and international organizations that will supposedly benefit from this resolution. But what about American women? What about their rights and freedoms?

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact of this resolution is negligible, but it sets a dangerous precedent for future legislation that could erode American sovereignty and values. By supporting globalist agendas and feminist ideologies, we're undermining the very fabric of our society. Mark my words, folks, this is just the beginning of a slippery slope towards a more socialist, less free America.

(Smirk) Now, I know what you're thinking: "But isn't it good to support women's rights?" Ah, yes, of course, we all want to help women, but not at the expense of American values and freedoms. This bill is just another example of how the liberal elites are using emotional manipulation to push their agenda. Wake up, America!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Joy, another meaningless resolution from the esteemed members of Congress. SRES 106 is a masterclass in empty rhetoric and feel-good posturing, all while accomplishing precisely nothing.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this resolution is to make its sponsors (Mrs. Shaheen and Ms. Collins) look like champions of women's rights, while actually doing squat to address the real issues. The objectives are to:

* Pay lip service to International Women's Day * Reiterate the importance of women's empowerment (yawn) * Acknowledge the existence of various problems affecting women worldwide (without offering any concrete solutions)

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** There are no actual provisions or changes to existing law in this resolution. It's a non-binding, symbolic gesture that doesn't even pretend to be more than a PR stunt.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The only parties affected by this resolution are the politicians who get to grandstand about their commitment to women's rights and the voters who will (hopefully) be fooled into thinking something meaningful is being done. In reality, the stakeholders are:

* Women worldwide, who will continue to face the same challenges and injustices despite this empty rhetoric * Lobbyists and special interest groups who will use this resolution as a talking point to further their own agendas

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this resolution is precisely zero. It won't change any laws, allocate funds, or provide tangible support to women's causes. The implications are:

* More hot air from politicians who care more about appearances than actual progress * Continued inaction on issues that genuinely affect women worldwide * A further erosion of trust in the ability of governments to address real problems

In conclusion, SRES 106 is a textbook example of legislative theater: all show, no substance. It's a cynical attempt to exploit the goodwill and idealism of voters while doing nothing to address the actual challenges faced by women globally. Bravo, Congress. You've managed to accomplish what you do best: nothing.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

SRES 106 is a resolution supporting the goals of International Women's Day, which aims to promote gender equality and empower women worldwide. The resolution recognizes the critical role women play in driving positive change, contributing to economic growth, and promoting peace and stability. It also acknowledges the disproportionate impact of global challenges on women and girls.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The resolution:

1. Reaffirms the United States' commitment to advancing gender equality and empowering women worldwide. 2. Recognizes the importance of addressing the inequities faced by women in achieving sustainable peace, international security, and economic stability. 3. Supports the implementation of the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017 (Public Law 115-68) and the United States Strategy and National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security. 4. Calls for increased efforts to address child marriage, violence against women, and girls' education.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

1. Women and girls worldwide, particularly those in countries affected by conflict or humanitarian crises. 2. The United States government, including the Department of State, USAID, and other agencies involved in international development and foreign policy. 3. International organizations, such as the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women) and UNICEF. 4. Civil society organizations and advocacy groups focused on women's rights and empowerment.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

1. Increased awareness and recognition of the importance of gender equality in achieving sustainable peace, international security, and economic stability. 2. Strengthened commitment from the United States government to address the inequities faced by women worldwide. 3. Potential policy changes and increased funding for programs aimed at promoting girls' education, preventing child marriage, and addressing violence against women. 4. Enhanced collaboration between governments, international organizations, and civil society groups to advance gender equality and empower women worldwide.

Overall, SRES 106 is a symbolic resolution that reaffirms the United States' commitment to advancing gender equality and empowering women worldwide. While it does not introduce new legislation or policy changes, it highlights the importance of addressing the inequities faced by women and girls in achieving sustainable peace, international security, and economic stability.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this congressional bill, SRES 106, supporting the goals of International Women's Day.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This resolution is all about recognizing the importance of women's empowerment and equality worldwide. It's like, we gotta acknowledge that women and girls make up half the global population, but they're still facing some gnarly challenges, bro. The main objective is to promote gender equality, prevent violence against women, and support their participation in peace negotiations and decision-making processes.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** This resolution doesn't introduce any new laws or regulations, but it's more like a statement of intent, you know? It reaffirms the US commitment to promoting women's empowerment and equality globally. It also references existing laws, like the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017, which aims to increase women's participation in peace negotiations and conflict prevention.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** This resolution affects women and girls worldwide, particularly those living in countries affected by conflict or humanitarian crises. It also impacts governments, international organizations, and NGOs working on women's empowerment and human rights issues. Additionally, it's a call to action for the US government to prioritize women's empowerment in its foreign policy.

**Potential Impact & Implications** If this resolution is adopted, it could lead to increased awareness and support for women's empowerment globally. It might also encourage governments and international organizations to prioritize women's participation in peace negotiations and decision-making processes. However, without concrete actions or funding commitments, the impact might be limited, bro.

Some key stats mentioned in the bill are pretty eye-opening:

* 12 million girls are married before they turn 18 every year. * Girls living in conflict-affected countries are 2.5 times more likely to be out of primary school than boys. * Women account for only 26.9% of national parliamentarians and 23.3% of government ministers worldwide.

These numbers highlight the need for action, dude. This resolution is a step in the right direction, but we gotta keep pushing for real change.

Anyway, that's SRES 106 in a nutshell, bro!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: SRES 106 - Supporting the Goals of International Women's Day**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** SRES 106 is a non-binding resolution that aims to support the goals of International Women's Day, emphasizing the importance of women's empowerment and participation in achieving global peace, prosperity, and sustainability. The resolution highlights the critical role women play in driving positive change, contributing to economic growth, and promoting conflict prevention and resolution.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution does not propose any changes to existing law but rather reaffirms the United States' commitment to advancing women's rights and empowerment globally. It references the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017 (Public Law 115-68) and the United States Strategy and National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security (2023), which aim to promote women's participation in peace negotiations and conflict prevention.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The resolution affects various stakeholders, including:

1. Women and girls globally, particularly those living in countries affected by conflict or humanitarian crises. 2. The United States government, which is encouraged to continue promoting women's empowerment and participation in foreign policy priorities. 3. International organizations, such as the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women) and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), which are mentioned in the resolution.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** While the resolution is non-binding, it has several potential implications:

1. **Raising awareness:** The resolution brings attention to the critical issues affecting women and girls globally, including child marriage, violence against women, and limited access to education and economic opportunities. 2. **Policy influence:** The resolution may influence future policy decisions related to women's empowerment and participation in peace negotiations and conflict prevention. 3. **International cooperation:** The resolution encourages international cooperation and collaboration to address the challenges faced by women and girls globally.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** While there are no direct financial interests mentioned in the resolution, several organizations and industries may be indirectly affected or influenced by the resolution's goals and objectives. These include:

1. **Women's rights organizations:** Organizations focused on promoting women's empowerment and participation, such as UN Women and the Global Fund for Women, may benefit from increased awareness and support. 2. **International development agencies:** Agencies like USAID and the World Bank may be influenced by the resolution's emphasis on women's economic empowerment and participation in peace negotiations. 3. **Defense contractors:** Companies involved in defense contracting may be affected by the resolution's focus on conflict prevention and resolution, particularly if it leads to increased investment in diplomacy and development initiatives.

**Committee Capture and Conflicts of Interest:** The Committee on Foreign Relations, which reported the resolution without amendment, has received significant funding from various PACs and special interest groups. These include:

1. **Defense contractors:** Companies like Lockheed Martin and Boeing have contributed

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$72,850

13 donors

PACs

Organizations

$250

Committees

Individuals

$72,600

No PAC contributions found

TILT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE LLC

1 transaction

$250

No committee contributions found

HAWASH, NOUR

4 transactions

$19,800

HAWASH, SAFA

2 transactions

$6,600

KANDIL, MARIAM

2 transactions

$6,600

SHAH, JAWAD

2 transactions

$6,600

SIMMONS, IAN

2 transactions

$6,600

SOLTAN, BOSHRA

2 transactions

$6,600

JONDY, JENAN

1 transaction

$3,300

KANDIL, OSAMA

1 transaction

$3,300

WU, ALBERT

1 transaction

$3,300

MORIN, THOMAS

1 transaction

$3,300

CROWLEY, MATTHEW

1 transaction

$3,300

HUNT, SWANEE

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Collins, Susan M. [R-ME]

ID: C001035

Top Contributors

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

PACPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jun 28, 2023

SILBEY, ALEXANDER

ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC, • CONSULTANT

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$6,600

Jul 23, 2024

ARNOLD, LAURA

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$6,600

Aug 10, 2024

READ, KURT

RSF PARTNERS • PARTNER

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

COATES, CHRIS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualIRVING, TX

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

READ, KURT

RSF PARTNERS • PARTNER

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

CROTTY, THOMAS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

COATES, CHRIS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualIRVING, TX

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

CROTTY, THOMAS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

YOUNGMAN, ANDREW

CITIZENS DISABILITY LLC • CEO

IndividualWEST NEWTON, MA

$3,300

Nov 20, 2023

Donor Network - Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 32 nodes and 24 connections (45 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $87,050

Top Donors - Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

Showing top 13 donors by contribution amount

1 Org12 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of State

Strong

Vector: 60%

Pages: 232-235AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"SRES 106 strongly aligns with Project 2025's emphasis on advancing women's health and family stability through the Geneva Consensus Declaration, as it promotes gender equality, women's empowerment, and addresses issues like child marriage and violence against women—core components of the Declaration's framework."

Key themes:gender equalitywomen's empowermentGeneva Consensus Declarationchild marriage preventionviolence against women

— 199 — Department of State 21. “Geneva Consensus Declaration on Promoting Women’s Health and Strengthening the Family,” October 22, 2021, https://www.theiwh.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/GCD-Declaration-2021-2.pdf (accessed March 13, 2023). 22. U.S. Commission on National Security, Road Map for National Security. 23. U.S. Department of State, “Organization Chart,” November 2004, https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/d/rm/rls/ perfrpt/2004/html/39764.htm (accessed March 9, 2023); U.S. Department of State, “Organization Chart,” November 2016, https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/263637.pdf (accessed March 9, 2023); U.S. Department of State, “Organization Chart,” February 2020, https://2017-2021.state.gov/wp-content/ uploads/2021/01/Dept-Org-Chart-Feb-2020-508.pdf (accessed March 9, 2023); U.S. Department of State, “DOS Org Chart August 2021,” August 2021, https://www.state.gov/department-of-state-organization-chart/ dos-org-chart-august-2021/ (accessed March 9, 2023); and U.S. Department of State, “Organization Chart,” May 2022, https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/DOS-Org-Chart-5052022-Non-Accessible. pdf (accessed March 9, 2023). 24. Emily O. Goldman, “Cyber Diplomacy for Strategic Competition: Fresh Thinking and New Approaches Are Needed on Diplomacy’s Newest Frontier,” Foreign Service Journal, June 2021, http://afsa.org/cyber- diplomacy-strategic-competition (accessed March 9, 2023). 25. Emily Goldman, “From Reaction to Action: Adopting a Competitive Posture in Cyber Diplomacy,” Texas National Security Review, Vol. 3, No. 4 (Fall 2020), https://tnsr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/TNSR-Vol3- Iss4-Goldman.pdf (accessed March 9, 2023). 26. United Nations General Assembly, “Group of Government Experts on Advancing Responsible State Behaviour in Cyberspace in the Context of International Security,” A/76/135, July 14, 2021, https://front.un-arm.org/wp- content/uploads/2021/08/A_76_135-2104030E-1.pdf (accessed March 10, 2023). 27. Goldman, “Cyber Diplomacy.” — 201 — 7 INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY Dustin J. Carmack MISSION STATEMENT To arm a future incoming conservative President with the knowledge and tools necessary to fortify the United States Intelligence Community; to defend against all foreign enemies and ensure the security and prosperity of our sovereign nation, devoid of all political motivations; and to maintain constitutional civil liberties. OVERVIEW The United States Intelligence Community (IC) is a vast, intricate bureaucracy spread throughout 18 independent and Cabinet subagencies.1 According to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), the IC’s mission is “to col- lect, analyze, and deliver foreign intelligence and counterintelligence information to America’s leaders so they can make sound decisions to protect our country.”2 An incoming conservative President needs to use these intelligence authorities aggressively to anticipate and thwart our adversaries, including Russia, Iran, North Korea, and especially China, while maintaining counterterrorism tools that have demonstrated their effectiveness. This means empowering the right personnel to manage, build, and effectively execute actions dispersed throughout the IC to deliver intelligence in an ever-challenging world. It also means removing redun- dancies, mission creep, and IC infighting that could prevent these collection tools from providing objective, apolitical, and empirically backed intelligence to the IC’s premier customer: the President of the United States. Today, as Abraham Lincoln famously said, “The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion…. [W]e must think anew, and act

Department of State

Moderate

Vector: 61%

Pages: 232-235AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the resolution and the Project 2025 item emphasize advancing women's rights and well‑being, with the Geneva Consensus Declaration focusing on women's health and family strengthening while SRES 106 promotes gender equality, empowerment, peace, security, education, and protection from violence, showing overlapping goals but differing scopes."

Key themes:women's empowermentgender equalitywomen's healthfamily strengtheningpeace and security

Agency for International Development

Weak

Vector: 60%

Pages: 312-314AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill promotes gender equality and women's empowerment globally, while the Project 2025 policy seeks to eliminate or reduce gender and diversity initiatives at USAID, creating a direct ideological conflict rather than alignment."

Key themes:genderUSAIDforeign assistance

— 279 — Agency for International Development clearances, and other components of the hiring process that are necessary for immediate onboarding while coordinating with the White House to bring in new appointees and make internal career employee changes. On Day One, USAID should halt all agencywide training and replace it with training modules to advance the President’s agenda. The Administration should appoint a Senior Accountable Official (SAO) to report on the agency’s adherence to Administration policy priorities, including on Protecting Life in Foreign Assistance, critical race theory, climate change, gender, and diversity and inclusion. It should also create a program to staff hard-to-fill positions overseas. Finally, the Administration should create a recruiting program for veterans and other groups to participate in career job opportunities at USAID. Former mis- sionaries, veterans, members of diasporas, and faith community stakeholders with overseas experience should be recruited to work at USAID on Schedule A appoint- ments, as Institutional Services Contractors, as Personal Services Contractors, and as Foreign Service Officers. CONCLUSION The next conservative Administration will have a unique opportunity to realign U.S. foreign assistance with American national interests and the principles of good governance and more accurately reflect the U.S. taxpayer’s unmatched charita- ble desire to help those in need. It can build on a strong baseline of conservative reforms undertaken by the Trump Administration to counter Communist China’s strategy of world domination. However, this will require that bold steps are taken on Day One to undo the gross misuse of foreign aid by the current Administration to promote a radical ideology that is politically divisive at home and harms our global standing. AUTHOR’S NOTE: The preparation of this chapter was a collective enterprise of individuals involved in the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. All contributors to this chapter are listed at the front of this volume, but Dr. William Steiger, Bethany Kozma, and Dr. Alma Golden deserve special mention. The author assumes full responsibility for the content of this chapter, and no views expressed therein should be attributed to any other individual. — 280 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. S. 1983, Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, Public Law No. 87-195, 87th Congress, September 4, 1961, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-75/pdf/STATUTE-75-Pg424-2.pdf (accessed January 19, 2023). 2. U.S. Agency or International Development, “Journey to Self-Reliance Fact Sheet,” June 3, 2020, https://2017-2020.usaid.gov/documents/1870/journey-self-reliance-fact-sheet#:~:text=WHAT%20 IS%20THE%20JOURNEY%20TO%20SELF-RELIANCE%3F%20USAID%20is,greater%20 developmentoutcomesandworktowardatimewhenforeignassistanceisnolongernecessary.%20 It%E2%80%99s%20called%20the%20Journey%20to%20Self-Reliance (accessed March 17, 2023). 3. News release, “U.S. Agency for International Development Administrator Mark Green’s Interview with C-Span’s ‘Newsmakers’ Host Susan Swain and Washington Post’s Carl Morello and Wall Street Journal’s Ben Kesling,” U.S. Agency for International Development, November 26, 2018, https://2017-2020.usaid.gov/news- information/press-releases/nov-26-2018-administrator-mark-green-interview-cspan-newsmakers (accessed March 17, 2023). 4. U.S. Agency for International Development, Digital Strategy 2020–2024, https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/ files/2022-05/USAID_Digital_Strategy.pdf.pdf://www.usaid.gov/digital-development/usaid-digital-strategy (accessed March 17, 2023). 5. “U.S. Strategic Framework for the Indo-Pacific,” declassified in part by Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs Robert C. O’Brien, January 5, 2021, https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp- content/uploads/2021/01/IPS-Final-Declass.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023), and Robert C. O’Brien, Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, “A Free and Open Indo-Pacific,” January 5, 2021, https:// trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/OBrien-Expanded-Statement.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 6. News Release, “Fact Sheet: Prioritizing Climate in Foreign Policy and National Security,” The White House, October 21, 2021, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/10/21/fact-sheet- prioritizing-climate-in-foreign-policy-and-national-security/ (accessed January 28, 2023). 7. U.S. Agency for International Development, Climate Strategy 2020–2030, April 2022, https://www.usaid.gov/ sites/default/files/2022-11/USAID-Climate-Strategy-2022-2030.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 8. Adva Saldinger, “USAID Steps Up ‘Languishing’ Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Effort,” Devex.com, December 15, 2021, http://www.devex.com/news/usaid-steps-up-languishing-diversity-equity-and-inclusion- effort-102316 (accessed January 28, 2021). 9. U.S. Agency for International Development, “Gender Equity and Women Empowerment,” https://www.usaid. gov/gender-equality-and-womens-empowerment (accessed January 30, 2023). 10. U.S. Agency for International Development, “Integrating Gender Equality and Female Empowerment in USAID’s Program Cycle,” ADS Chapter 25, partial revision date January 22, 2021, https://www.usaid.gov/sites/ default/files/2022-12/205.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 11. S. 137, Protecting Life in Foreign Assistance Act, 117th Congress, introduced January 28, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/137#:~:text=Protecting%20Life%20in%20Foreign%20 Assistance%20Act.%20This%20bill,support%20for%20an%20entity%20that%20conducts%20 such%20activities (accessed January 20, 2023), and H.R. 534, Protecting Life in Foreign Assistance Act, 117th Congress, introduced January 28, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house- bill/534?s=1&r=450 (accessed January 20, 2023). 12. President Joseph R. Biden Jr., “Memorandum on Protecting Women’s Health at Home and Abroad,” Memorandum for the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, The White House, January 28, 2021, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/28/memorandum- on-protecting-womens-health-at-home-and-abroad/ (accessed March 18, 2023). 13. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13926, “Advancing International Religious Freedom,” June 2, 2020, in Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 109 (June 5, 2020), pp. 34951–34953, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ FR-2020-06-05/pdf/2020-12430.pdf (accessed January 20, 2023). 14. 22 Code of Federal Regulations § 205.1, https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-22/chapter-II/part-205 (accessed March 18, 2023). 15. Contributor’s notes from internal USAID meetings.

Agency for International Development

Weak

Vector: 60%

Pages: 291-293AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill supports gender equality and women's empowerment globally, while Project 2025 seeks to dismantle USAID's DEI and gender equity initiatives, reframe gender policy around traditional family structures, and eliminate references to gender diversity and reproductive rights—creating a fundamental ideological opposition."

Key themes:gender equalitywomen's empowermentinternational developmentUSAID programming

— 258 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise are best deployed to strengthen the resilience of countries that are most vulner- able to climatic shifts. The agency should cease collaborating with and funding progressive foundations, corporations, international institutions, and NGOs that advocate on behalf of climate fanaticism. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Agenda. USAID installed advisers on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) committees “in all its Bureaus, Offices, and [overseas] Missions” and created “an agency-wide dashboard and DEI scorecard for all bureaus, offices, and missions” to track staff compliance with the Adminis- tration’s DEI directives. A Chief DEI Officer oversees this DEI infrastructure and sits in the Administrator’s office. DEI directives are now part of all agency policies and are incorporated as standard clauses in all contract and grant awards. Those seeking to do business with the agency must “describe the approaches they will use to diversify their partner base.”8 USAID often ties DEI to “gender and climate equity,” corrupting every aspect of the agency’s overseas work. The upshot has been to racialize the agency and create a hostile work environ- ment for anyone who disagrees with the Biden Administration’s identity politics. This pursuit of ideological purity threatens merit-based professional advancement for staff who do not overtly conform, hyperpoliticizes what should be a nonpartisan federal workplace environment, creates an institutionalized cadre of progressive political commissars, corrupts the award process, and discourages potential con- tractors and grantees that disagree with this radical agenda from applying for USAID funding. The next conservative Administration should dismantle USAID’s DEI apparatus by eliminating the Chief Diversity Officer position along with the DEI advisers and committees; cancel the DEI scorecard and dashboard; remove DEI requirements from contract and grant tenders and awards; issue a directive to cease promotion of the DEI agenda, including the bullying LGBTQ+ agenda; and provide staff a confidential medium through which to adjudicate cases of political retaliation that agency or implementing staff suffered during the Biden Administration. It should eliminate funding for partners that promote discriminatory DEI practices and consider debarment in egregious cases. As federal departments and agencies cannot play partisan politics, staff—irre- spective of hiring mechanism—as well as implementers and grantees that engage in ideological agitation on behalf of the DEI agenda should be dismissed, and enti- ties should be debarred. The next conservative Administration should return the authority over all civil rights issues at USAID to the agency’s Office of Civil Rights, which is the appropriate locus for ensuring that all Americans have guaranteed equality of career opportunity at USAID. Refocusing Gender Equality on Women, Children, and Families. Instead of protecting women’s and children’s unalienable human rights and propelling their ability to thrive in society, past Democrat Administrations have nearly erased — 259 — Agency for International Development what females are and what femininity is through “gender” policies and practices. For instance, these Administrations have diluted USAID’s focus on assisting vul- nerable women, children, and families around the globe by adding protections for and ideological advocacy on behalf of progressive special-interest groups. USAID now aggressively promotes abortion on demand under the guise of “sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights,” “gender equality,” and “women’s empowerment” and advocates for those who claim minority status or vulnerability. Families are the basic unit of and foundation for a thriving society. Without women, there are no children, and society cannot continue. As evidenced by the confirmation testimony of now-Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the progressive Left has so misused and altered the definition of what a “woman” is that one of our U.S. Supreme Court Justices was unable to delineate clearly the fundamental biological and sexual traits that define the group of which she is a part. USAID cannot advocate for and protect women when they have been erased globally along with the values and traditional structures that have supported them. The next conservative Administration should rename the USAID Office of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment (GEWE) as the USAID Office of Women, Children, and Families; refocus and realign resources that currently support programs in GEWE to the Office of Women, Children, and Families; redes- ignate the Senior Gender Coordinator as an unapologetically pro-life politically appointed Senior Coordinator of the Office of Women, Children, and Families; and eliminate the “more than 180 gender advisors and points of contact…embedded in Missions and Operating Units throughout the Agency.”9 In addition, the next conservative Administration should rescind President Biden’s 2022 Gender Policy and refocus it on Women, Children, and Families and revise the agency’s regulation on “Integrating Gender Equality and Female Empowerment in USAID’s Program Cycle.”10 It should remove all references, exam- ples, definitions, photos, and language on USAID websites, in agency publications and policies, and in all agency contracts and grants that include the following terms: “gender,” “gender equality,” “gender equity,” “gender diverse individu- als,” “gender aware,” “gender sensitive,” etc. It should also remove references to “abortion,” “reproductive health,” and “sexual and reproductive rights” and con- troversial sexual education materials. In the past, the word “gender” was a polite alternative to the word “sex” or term “biological sex.” The Left has commandeered the term “gender,” which used to mean either “male” or “female,” to include a spectrum of others who are seeking to alter biological and societal sexual norms. The promotion of gender radicalism is anathema to the traditional norms of many societies where USAID works, causes resentment by tying lifesaving assistance to rejecting the aid recipient’s own firmly held fundamental values regarding sexuality, and produces unnecessary conster- nation and confusion among and even outright bias against men.

Agency for International Development

Minimal

Vector: 61%

Pages: 291-293AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill supports gender equality, women's empowerment, and reproductive health initiatives, which directly contradict the Project 2025 policy's goal to eliminate gender ideology, abortion advocacy, and related terminology from USAID programs."

Key themes:USAIDwomen's empowermentgender equality

— 259 — Agency for International Development what females are and what femininity is through “gender” policies and practices. For instance, these Administrations have diluted USAID’s focus on assisting vul- nerable women, children, and families around the globe by adding protections for and ideological advocacy on behalf of progressive special-interest groups. USAID now aggressively promotes abortion on demand under the guise of “sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights,” “gender equality,” and “women’s empowerment” and advocates for those who claim minority status or vulnerability. Families are the basic unit of and foundation for a thriving society. Without women, there are no children, and society cannot continue. As evidenced by the confirmation testimony of now-Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the progressive Left has so misused and altered the definition of what a “woman” is that one of our U.S. Supreme Court Justices was unable to delineate clearly the fundamental biological and sexual traits that define the group of which she is a part. USAID cannot advocate for and protect women when they have been erased globally along with the values and traditional structures that have supported them. The next conservative Administration should rename the USAID Office of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment (GEWE) as the USAID Office of Women, Children, and Families; refocus and realign resources that currently support programs in GEWE to the Office of Women, Children, and Families; redes- ignate the Senior Gender Coordinator as an unapologetically pro-life politically appointed Senior Coordinator of the Office of Women, Children, and Families; and eliminate the “more than 180 gender advisors and points of contact…embedded in Missions and Operating Units throughout the Agency.”9 In addition, the next conservative Administration should rescind President Biden’s 2022 Gender Policy and refocus it on Women, Children, and Families and revise the agency’s regulation on “Integrating Gender Equality and Female Empowerment in USAID’s Program Cycle.”10 It should remove all references, exam- ples, definitions, photos, and language on USAID websites, in agency publications and policies, and in all agency contracts and grants that include the following terms: “gender,” “gender equality,” “gender equity,” “gender diverse individu- als,” “gender aware,” “gender sensitive,” etc. It should also remove references to “abortion,” “reproductive health,” and “sexual and reproductive rights” and con- troversial sexual education materials. In the past, the word “gender” was a polite alternative to the word “sex” or term “biological sex.” The Left has commandeered the term “gender,” which used to mean either “male” or “female,” to include a spectrum of others who are seeking to alter biological and societal sexual norms. The promotion of gender radicalism is anathema to the traditional norms of many societies where USAID works, causes resentment by tying lifesaving assistance to rejecting the aid recipient’s own firmly held fundamental values regarding sexuality, and produces unnecessary conster- nation and confusion among and even outright bias against men. — 260 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise The next Administration should ensure that USAID’s goal in service of its mission is to help protect and propel all members of society—women, children, and men—from conception to natural death. To do so, USAID’s Office of Women, Children, and Families should strive to ensure that communities have their basic human needs, without which they will be unable to thrive, met first and foremost. Basic human needs include equal and safe access to potable water, sanitation, food, education, health care, houses of worship, justice, pregnancy and family resource centers, working capital, electricity, technology, and business opportunities. The Office of Women, Children, and Families should implement the Geneva Consen- sus Declaration on Women’s Health and Protection of the Family and prioritize partnerships with local organizations, including faith-based organizations (FBOs). Protecting Life in Foreign Assistance. Protecting life should be among the core objectives of United States foreign assistance. Shortly after taking office, how- ever, President Biden issued a memorandum that reversed a myriad of pro-life policies and revoked the Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance (PLGHA) policy, widely known as the Mexico City Policy. Biden also restored funding to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), which supports and implements China’s coercive abortion and sterilization regimen. PLGHA requires foreign NGOs, as a condition of receiving assistance, to agree not to perform or actively promote abortions as a method of family planning in foreign countries. Previous pro-life Presidents beginning with Ronald Reagan applied these conditions to family planning assistance, but President Trump for the first time expanded the Mexico City Policy to protect “global health assistance furnished by all departments or agencies” (estimated to be $8.8 billion annually). The Biden Administration restored abortion subsidies to pro-abortion NGOs including Planned Parenthood International and MSI Reproductive Choices. In reversing PLGHA, Biden declared a radical assault on the policy of protecting life, choosing instead to promote abortion on demand around the world under the guise of “sexual and reproductive health and rights.” USAID’s priority of funding the global abortion industry negates programs that promote life, women’s health, and the family. Even under PLGHA, several loopholes allowed support for the global abortion industry to continue. International NGOs that perform and promote abortions overseas like Population Services International, Pathfinder, PATH, the Population Council, EngenderHealth, and WomanCare Global International continued to receive funding from USAID under PLGHA and now, under Biden, receive tens of millions more in U.S. taxpayer dollars in foreign assistance annually without any oversight. When the United Nations Secretariat promoted abortion and abor- tion-inducing drugs under the umbrella of “sexual and reproductive health” as an element of its COVID-19 Global Humanitarian Response Plan in May 2020, the exemptions in PLGHA for humanitarian aid and multilateral organizations

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne

U.S. Tech PATH Act

119/s/4570

Coordinated Support for Rural Small Businesses Act

119/s/1093

World War II Women's Memorial Location Act

119/s/1088

Back to All Bills