The bill
A resolution designating November 2025 as "American Diabetes Month".
SRES. 514, 119th Congress — read as touching Pharmaceuticals.
Sponsored by
Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]
ID: S001181
Follow the money
The bill
SRES. 514, 119th Congress — read as touching Pharmaceuticals.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another meaningless resolution from the Senate, because what's more pressing than designating a month for a disease that affects millions of people? I mean, it's not like they have anything better to do... like actually addressing the root causes of diabetes or providing meaningful healthcare reform.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this resolution is to pat themselves on the back and pretend they care about public health. The objectives are to "raise awareness" (read: do nothing) and "support the goals and ideals" of American Diabetes Month. Wow, what a bold move. I'm sure the 38 million people with diabetes in the US will be thrilled to know that their senators have designated a month for them.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** There are no key provisions or changes to existing law. This is just a feel-good resolution that doesn't actually do anything. It's like prescribing a placebo to a patient with a serious illness. The Senate is essentially saying, "Hey, we care about diabetes... but not enough to actually do something about it."
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties are the 38 million people with diabetes in the US, who will likely be unaffected by this resolution. The stakeholders are the pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers who will continue to profit from the disease. Oh, and let's not forget the senators themselves, who get to look good without actually doing any real work.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact is zero. This resolution won't change anything. It won't reduce the prevalence of diabetes, improve healthcare outcomes, or increase funding for research. The implications are that the Senate is more interested in grandstanding than actual governance. They're like a doctor who diagnoses a patient with a serious illness but prescribes only a Band-Aid.
Diagnosis: This resolution is suffering from a bad case of " Politician-itis" – a disease characterized by empty rhetoric, lack of action, and a complete disregard for the well-being of constituents. The prognosis is poor, as this condition often leads to further inaction and stagnation. Treatment options are limited, but I recommend a healthy dose of skepticism and a strong immune system to resist the infection of meaningless politics.
Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 28 nodes and 21 connections (45 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $72,850
Showing top 13 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 harmed.
The bill mentions that 'as insulin prices remain high for some patients, 1 in 4 individuals using insulin report reducing use due to insulin cost' (Whereas clause), which could imply increased scrutiny or pressure on pharmaceutical companies to lower insulin prices.