Taxpayer Data Protection Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/1101
Last Updated: June 10, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11]

ID: S001215

Follow the money

The bill

Taxpayer Data Protection Act

HR. 1101, 119th Congress — read as touching Commercial Banks.

The sponsor

Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$84,700 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

60% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 630-632 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H625-626)

February 10, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Taxpayer Data Protection Act (HR 1101) claims to prohibit unlawful access to the payment system of the Bureau of the Fiscal Service within the Department of the Treasury. How noble. In reality, this bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, attempting to address the symptoms rather than the underlying disease: government incompetence and corruption.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 321 of title 31, United States Code, by adding new requirements for accessing the payment system. These include:

* Restricting access to officers, employees, or contractors with a "fully successful" performance rating (because who needs accountability?) and at least one year of service. * Requiring security clearances for non-employees (a nice little gift to the clearance industry). * Mandating training on privacy laws and cybersecurity regulations (because a few hours of PowerPoint will surely prevent data breaches).

These provisions are nothing more than a smokescreen, designed to create the illusion of action while maintaining the status quo.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:

* The Department of the Treasury (which will likely continue to botch its duties). * Contractors and employees with access to the payment system (who will now have to jump through more hoops to get paid). * Taxpayers (who will remain blissfully unaware of the bill's ineffectiveness).

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "legislative placebo effect." It creates a false sense of security, while doing nothing to address the root causes of data breaches and corruption. The real impact will be:

* Increased bureaucracy and red tape for contractors and employees. * More opportunities for cronyism and favoritism in the clearance process. * A continued lack of accountability and transparency within the Department of the Treasury.

In short, this bill is a waste of time and resources, designed to pacify the gullible public while maintaining the corrupt status quo. Bravo, Congress. You've managed to create another masterpiece of legislative ineptitude.

Related Topics

Cybersecurity & Data PrivacyFederal Budget & AppropriationsExecutive Branch Oversight
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$84,700
25 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$28,600
Committees
$0
Individuals
$56,100

No PAC contributions found

1
MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,600
2
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
3
NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI
1 transaction
$3,300
4
POKAGON BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
5
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE
1 transaction
$3,300
6
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$3,300
7
SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION
2 transactions
$2,500
8
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
2 transactions
$2,000
9
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$1,000

No committee contributions found

1
TURKISH, JASON
2 transactions
$6,600
2
JARBOU, FRANK
1 transaction
$3,300
3
SACKS, CARI B.
1 transaction
$3,300
4
JARVIS-SHEAN, ELIZABETH
1 transaction
$3,300
5
BLUHM, NEIL
1 transaction
$3,300
6
SILVERSTEIN, WILLIAM
1 transaction
$3,300
7
SACKS, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$3,300
8
SHAPIRO, ANDREW
1 transaction
$3,300
9
CHERN, ERIC
1 transaction
$3,300
10
SANDBERG, SHERYL
1 transaction
$3,300
11
CHERN, LAURA
1 transaction
$3,300
12
GURAL, JEFFREY R.
1 transaction
$3,300
13
GATES, WILLIAM H. III
1 transaction
$3,300
14
BROWN, GREGORY
1 transaction
$3,300
15
WALKER, KENT
1 transaction
$3,300
16
WYETT, TODD
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6]

ID: C001117

Top Contributors

10

1
OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
OrganizationRED ROCK, OK
$3,300
Feb 28, 2024
2
OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
OrganizationRED ROCK, OK
$3,300
Feb 28, 2024
3
TAMELING, GRETTA A.
N/ARETIRED
IndividualWHEATON, IL
$3,500
Jul 9, 2024
4
HUANG, CAROLINE B
N/ANOT-EMPLOYED
IndividualBELMONT, MA
$3,300
Oct 24, 2024
5
PRICE, RICHARD S
MESIROW FINANCIALEXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN
IndividualHIGHLAND PARK, IL
$3,300
Oct 30, 2024
6
SIMON, DEBORAH
NOT EMPLOYEDNOT EMPLOYED
IndividualCARMEL, IN
$3,300
Nov 7, 2024
7
ABDEY, JULIAN
CAPITAL GROUP.FINANCE
IndividualHILLSBOROUGH, CA
$3,300
Oct 7, 2023
8
ANDREAE, CHRISTINE
SELF EMPLOYEDWRITER/ARTIST
IndividualBENTONVILLE, VA
$3,300
Oct 14, 2023
9
ANDREAE, ERICA
SELF-EMPLOYEDBUSINESS OWNER
IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN
$3,300
Dec 9, 2023
10
ANDREAE, MORGAN
CUMMINSENGINEER
IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN
$3,300
Dec 9, 2023

Rep. Whitesides, George [D-CA-27]

ID: W000830

Top Contributors

10

1
SWING LEFT
CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD
PACWASHINGTON, DC
$2,400
Nov 5, 2024
2
AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICA
CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD
PACWASHINGTON, DC
$500
Oct 17, 2024
3
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA
$1,000
Aug 8, 2024
4
HARRIS, WILLIAM
MASS GENERAL HOSPITALPHYSICIAN
IndividualLEXINGTON, MA
$5,000
Jan 25, 2024
5
HARRIS, WILLIAM
IndividualLEXINGTON, MA
$5,000
Feb 7, 2024
6
BAILEY, DAVID
KPPB LLPPATENT ATTORNEY
IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA
$3,300
Oct 22, 2024
7
BIRMINGHAM, CYNTHIA
SELF EMPLOYEDATTORNEY
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$3,300
Oct 30, 2024
8
BROOKS, JAMES
GRACIE FILMSWRITER/DIRECTOR/PRODUCER
IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA
$3,300
Oct 17, 2024
9
CLUBOK, ANDY
LATHAM & WATKINS LLPATTORNEY
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$3,300
Oct 30, 2024
10
DELANEY, QUINN
NOT EMPLOYEDRETIRED
IndividualPIEDMONT, CA
$3,300
Nov 9, 2024

Rep. Velázquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7]

ID: V000081

Top Contributors

0

No contribution data available

Rep. Sherrill, Mikie [D-NJ-11]

ID: S001207

Top Contributors

10

1
SANZONE, MICHAEL
HSBC BANKBANKER
IndividualGLEN RIDGE, NJ
$3,300
Nov 4, 2024
2
ST. ROMAIN, CLAUDETTE L.
SETON HALL UNIVERSITYPROFESSOR
IndividualCHATHAM, NJ
$3,300
Oct 23, 2024
3
LUSTBERG, LAWRENCE S.
NOT EMPLOYEDNOT EMPLOYED
IndividualCHATHAM, NJ
$3,300
Oct 23, 2024
4
SLATER, FREDRIC
LRF SLATER COMPANIES, INC.PRESIDENT
IndividualLIVINGSTON, NJ
$3,300
Oct 28, 2024
5
ST. ROMAIN, CLAUDETTE L.
SETON HALL UNIVERSITYPROFESSOR
IndividualCHATHAM, NJ
$3,300
Oct 23, 2024
6
JOY, MARTHA
NOT EMPLOYEDNOT EMPLOYED
IndividualENGLEWOOD, FL
$3,300
Nov 3, 2024
7
CONNORS, SUSAN
NAGEL RICE, LLPATTORNEY
IndividualCHATHAM, NJ
$3,300
Oct 23, 2024
8
MILLER, VALERIE
NOT EMPLOYEDNOT EMPLOYED
IndividualBROOKLYN, NY
$3,300
Oct 27, 2024
9
MILLER, JOSHUA
THE BROWSER COMPANY OF NEW YORKCEO
IndividualBROOKLYN, NY
$3,300
Oct 27, 2024
10
MINDICH, ERIC
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Nov 20, 2024

Rep. Moulton, Seth [D-MA-6]

ID: M001196

Top Contributors

10

1
KARLA'S MARKET
OrganizationREVERE, MA
$500
Jul 25, 2023
2
BLOOM, BRADLEY
N/ANOT EMPLOYED
IndividualWELLESLEY, MA
$6,600
Nov 15, 2024
3
BREDENBERG, DIANE M.
N/ANOT EMPLOYED
IndividualSOUTHLAKE, TX
$6,600
Nov 15, 2024
4
SHAH, NIRAJ
WAYFAIRRETAIL
IndividualBOSTON, MA
$6,600
Nov 17, 2024
5
CORCORAN, JAMES
AREX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LPINVESTOR
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Nov 20, 2024
6
D'AMICO, ALEXANDER
MCKINSEY & COMPANYCONSULTANT
IndividualNEW CANAAN, CT
$6,600
Nov 18, 2024
7
HASTINGS, MARK
PSG EQUITYINVESTOR
IndividualBOSTON, MA
$6,600
Nov 20, 2024
8
LEDLEY, CHARLES H.
LIMINALITY CAPITAL LPINVESTOR
IndividualBOSTON, MA
$6,600
Nov 21, 2024
9
PEELER, DAVID RANDY
BERKSHIRE PARTNERSMANAGING DIRECTOR
IndividualCAMBRIDGE, MA
$6,600
Nov 18, 2024
10
SHORTSLEEVE, BRIAN
M33 GROWTHVENTURE CAPITAL
IndividualWELLESLEY, MA
$6,600
Nov 21, 2024

Rep. Jacobs, Sara [D-CA-51]

ID: J000305

Top Contributors

10

1
SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION
OrganizationEL CAJON, CA
$3,300
Jun 30, 2023
2
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA
$3,300
Aug 28, 2023
3
SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION
OrganizationEL CAJON, CA
$3,300
Sep 18, 2024
4
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA
$2,000
Jun 30, 2024
5
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$1,000
Feb 14, 2023
6
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationBANNING, CA
$1,000
Sep 30, 2024
7
ONEIDA NATION
OrganizationONEIDA, WI
$1,000
Sep 30, 2024
8
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
OrganizationATMORE, AL
$1,000
Aug 5, 2024
9
JACOBS, MARA
NYC DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONTEACHER
IndividualBROOKLYN, NY
$4,300
Dec 14, 2023
10
HESS, LAWRENCE
LEHBROS LIMITEDREAL ESTATE
IndividualSAN DIEGO, CA
$3,300
Oct 22, 2024

Rep. Sánchez, Linda T. [D-CA-38]

ID: S001156

Top Contributors

0

No contribution data available

Rep. Adams, Alma S. [D-NC-12]

ID: A000370

Top Contributors

10

1
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$1,000
Dec 14, 2023
2
HALES, CALLA
SELF EMPLOYEDMEDICAL ADMINISTRATOR
IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC
$3,825
Oct 7, 2023
3
GOCHMAN, MOLLY
NOT EMPLOYEDNOT EMPLOYED
IndividualHOUSTON, TX
$3,300
Nov 7, 2023
4
HALES, CALLA
SELF EMPLOYEDMEDICAL ADMINISTRATOR
IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC
$3,300
Aug 22, 2023
5
RUMER, ANDREW F
NOT EMPLOYEDRETIRED
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$3,300
Aug 20, 2024
6
AULT, RICHARD
NOT EMPLOYEDRETIRED
IndividualDAVIDSON, NC
$3,300
Sep 27, 2024
7
AULT, RUTH L
NOT EMPLOYEDRETIRED
IndividualDAVIDSON, NC
$3,300
Sep 27, 2024
8
WEEKS, DEBRA
C.W. WILLIAMS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTEREXECUTIVE
IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC
$2,900
Mar 24, 2023
9
LEWIS, JACQUELINE
NOT EMPLOYEDNOT EMPLOYED
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$2,900
Mar 7, 2023
10
KEATON-BARROW, MICHELLE K
KEATON BARROW REALTYREAL ESTATE AGENT
IndividualGARNER, NC
$2,600
Oct 10, 2023

Rep. Pallone, Frank [D-NJ-6]

ID: P000034

Top Contributors

10

1
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS
OrganizationTACOMA, WA
$3,300
May 22, 2024
2
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS
OrganizationTACOMA, WA
$2,900
Jun 6, 2023
3
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,650
Jun 18, 2024
4
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,650
Jun 1, 2023
5
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
OrganizationDURANT, OK
$1,000
Oct 16, 2024
6
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
OrganizationDURANT, OK
$825
Sep 29, 2023
7
HOLMDEL FUNERAL HOME
OrganizationHOLMDEL, NJ
$500
Dec 1, 2023
8
MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS
OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS
$500
Dec 27, 2023
9
HIGHLANDS DEMOCRATIC CLUB
OrganizationHIGHLANDS, NJ
$500
Sep 10, 2024
10
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS
OrganizationTACOMA, WA
$400
May 22, 2024

Rep. Frost, Maxwell [D-FL-10]

ID: F000476

Top Contributors

10

1
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationBANNING, CA
$1,000
Jun 28, 2024
2
MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS
OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS
$500
Sep 26, 2023
3
HULL, MEGAN
SELF EMPLOYEDACTIVIST
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$3,300
Nov 17, 2024
4
HARRIS, WILLIAM
PERKINS + WILLARCHITECT
IndividualCAMBRIDGE, MA
$3,300
Oct 29, 2023
5
BOYLAND, DORIAN
BOYLAND AUTO ORLANDOBUSINESS OWNER
IndividualWINDERMERE, FL
$3,300
Oct 13, 2023
6
TILLMAN, BRIAN
WINDOW WORLDOWNER
IndividualORLANDO, FL
$3,300
Oct 20, 2023
7
PISCITELLI, JUNE
SMARTHINKINGINSTRUCTOR
IndividualFORT LAUDERDALE, FL
$3,300
Oct 6, 2023
8
WILLIAMS, TERESA
SELF EMPLOYEDMANAGEMENT CONSULTANT
IndividualWINTER PARK, FL
$3,300
Dec 2, 2023
9
HARRIS, WILLIAM
PERKINS + WILLARCHITECT
IndividualCAMBRIDGE, MA
$3,300
Oct 29, 2023
10
PISCITELLI, JUNE
SMARTHINKINGINSTRUCTOR
IndividualFORT LAUDERDALE, FL
$3,300
Oct 6, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 92 nodes and 42 connections (87 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $122,300

Top Donors - Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

9 Orgs16 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 harmed.

  • Commercial Banksconfidence 0.80

    Section 2(e)(1) imposes restrictions on access to the payment system of the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, which may increase regulatory burden on commercial banks that interact with this system.

  • Crypto & Fintechconfidence 0.60

    Section 2(e)(1) restricts access to payment systems, potentially affecting fintech companies that rely on these systems, including those involved in cryptocurrency transactions.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Stevens, Haley M. [D-MI-11])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HARMS

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.

Introduction

Moderate60.1%
Pages: 630-632

— 598 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise unemployment programs were defrauded of hundreds of billions of dollars, includ- ing by state-sponsored hacking groups. Not all state agencies are yet through their backlogs of appeals and fraud cases; the recovery of lost funds has been minimal; and fraud has now spilled into the traditional UI programs. The CARES Act era drastically altered the entire UI ecosystem: The federal–state partnership shifted toward federal programs and funding, and the social insurance purpose of the program was disconnected as benefits were extended, expanded to more typically uncovered populations, and made exponentially larger. l Congress should enact bipartisan commonsense UI program reforms, including statutory authority for the Labor Office of Inspector General (OIG) to access all state UI records for the purposes of investigation and requiring state agencies to crossmatch applicants with the National Directory of New Hires. l Congress should also develop a framework (through commission of a congressional report to serve as a blueprint) of technical standards on broader tech topics like usability, state agency cybersecurity postures, data taxonomy standardization, and/or identity verification standards. l Congress should provide DOL with more reasonable enforcement tools for the UI system. Currently, DOL can either send a strongly worded letter or revoke the entire Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA)16 tax credit, which would place an immediate 6 percent to 7 percent tax on all covered employers. l DOL should review all actual or planned procurements against the $2 billion (under the American Rescue Plan Act)17 for UI fraud detection, accessibility, and equity investments. These funds do not have appropriations timelines and have very minimal statutory descriptions of the intended purpose. DOL should also review and propose changes to improve state monitoring programs including developing evidence-based frameworks for evaluating the technical readiness and security postures of the state agencies; strengthen its relationship with the OIG and Government Accountability Office (GAO), and support continued development of fraud prosecution with DOJ, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the financial services community; ensure administrative and IT funding is outcome-based; and gather and publish best practices from state officials, industry partners, and other vendors who deliver UI services. — 599 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies WORKER VOICE AND COLLECTIVE BARGAINING Non-Union Worker Voice and Representation. American workers lack a meaningful voice in today’s workplace. Between 50 percent and 60 percent of workers have less influence than they want on critical workplaces issues beyond pay and benefits. Even managers are twice as likely to say their employees have too little influence rather than too much. But America’s one-size-fits-all approach undermines worker representation. Federal labor law offers no alternatives to labor unions whose politicking and adversarial approach appeals to few, whereas most workers report that they prefer a more cooperative model run jointly with management that focuses solely on workplace issues. The next Administration should make new options available to workers and push Congress to pass labor reforms that create non-union “employee involvement organizations” as well as a mechanism for worker representation on corporate boards. l Congress should reintroduce and pass the Teamwork for Employees and Managers (TEAM) Act of 2022.18 The TEAM Act: 1. Reforms the National Labor Relations Act’s (NLRA) Section 8(a)(2) prohibition on formal worker–management cooperative organizations like works councils. 2. Creates an “Employee Involvement Organization” (EIO) to facilitate voluntary cooperation on critical issues like working conditions, benefits, and productivity. 3. Amends labor law to allow EIOs at large, publicly traded corporations to elect a non-voting, supervisory member of their company’s board of directors. Alternative View. While some conservatives lament that workers lack sufficient voice in today’s workplace, others interpret the rise in independent and flexible work opportunities, significant expansion in family-friendly policies like paid family leave, and the decline in private sector unionization as indicators of workers’ increasing competency and control. Another way to help expand workers’ freedom and voices in traditional workplaces is by allowing them to choose who represents them in negotiations with their employer. The Worker’s Choice Act19 would accom- plish this by ending exclusive representation so that unions in right-to-work states are no longer forced to represent workers who do not want to join them. Union Transparency. Private-sector unions must file detailed financial infor- mation with DOL—on matters including union spending, income, loans, assets, membership information, and employee salary—but unions composed entirely

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills