The bill
Sunshine Protection Act of 2025
HR. 139, 119th Congress — read as touching Electric Utilities.
Sponsored by
Rep. Buchanan, Vern [R-FL-16]
ID: B001260
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 139, 119th Congress — read as touching Electric Utilities.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
July 14, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another brilliant example of congressional idiocy, masquerading as a "Sunshine Protection Act." How quaint.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to make daylight saving time (DST) permanent, because, apparently, our esteemed lawmakers have nothing better to do than dictate how we set our clocks. The objective? To "protect" us from the horrors of changing our clocks twice a year. I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that some special interest groups might benefit from this change.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill repeals the temporary period for DST, effectively making it permanent. It also amends the Uniform Time Act of 1966 and the Calder Act to reflect this change. Oh, and there's a lovely exemption clause that allows states to opt out, because who needs consistency in timekeeping, anyway? The changes are so convoluted that I'm surprised the lawmakers didn't get lost in their own bureaucratic maze.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects will be affected: citizens who actually care about things like sleep patterns and productivity; businesses that might benefit from the change (hello, golf course owners!); and, of course, the politicians themselves, who'll get to pat themselves on the back for "protecting" us.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact will be negligible, except for the fact that we'll all have to adjust our clocks... permanently. The implications? Well, it's a classic case of "legislative placebo effect." Our lawmakers will pretend they've accomplished something meaningful, while the rest of us will just roll our eyes and wonder what other pressing issues they're ignoring.
Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a bad case of "Legislator's Ego Inflation Syndrome" (LEIS), where politicians try to justify their existence by passing meaningless laws. The underlying disease? A severe lack of common sense, combined with an overdose of self-importance.
Treatment: Apply a healthy dose of skepticism and ridicule. Repeat as necessary until the patient (i.e., our lawmakers) develops a sense of humility and starts addressing real problems.
Rep. Buchanan, Vern [R-FL-16]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: M001230
Top Contributors
10
ID: F000466
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001220
Top Contributors
10
ID: W000806
Top Contributors
10
ID: N000189
Top Contributors
10
ID: D000626
Top Contributors
10
ID: S000168
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001204
Top Contributors
10
ID: C001103
Top Contributors
10
ID: B000740
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 44 nodes and 35 connections (34 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $126,482
Showing top 15 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 7 helped.
Section 2(b) amends the standard time, which could lead to reduced energy consumption during peak hours, benefiting electric utilities.
Section 2(b) could lead to increased daylight hours, potentially increasing the generation of solar power and benefiting renewable energy industries.
Permanent daylight saving time may increase outdoor dining and consumer activity during evening hours, benefiting restaurants and food service industries.
Permanent daylight saving time may reduce energy demand for heating, but could also increase energy demand for cooling, potentially affecting oil and gas industries.
Changes in energy demand due to permanent daylight saving time may affect the operations of pipelines and energy infrastructure.
Section 2(b) could lead to increased shopping hours and consumer activity during daylight hours, benefiting big-box retail.
+ 1 more industry not shown.