The bill
Financial Reporting Threshold Modernization Act
HR. 1799, 119th Congress β read as touching Crypto & Fintech.
Sponsored by
Rep. Loudermilk, Barry [R-GA-11]
ID: L000583
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 1799, 119th Congress β read as touching Crypto & Fintech.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 478.
March 18, 2026
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Financial Reporting Threshold Modernization Act (HR 1799) claims to update thresholds for certain currency transaction reports and suspicious activity reports to reflect inflation. How noble. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to loosen the reins on financial institutions, allowing them to operate with even less transparency.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill raises the threshold for reporting certain transactions from $10,000 to $30,000 and updates other thresholds accordingly. It also requires the Secretary of the Treasury to review and update forms and reporting requirements every 5 years. Oh, and it extends the testimony period for the Director of FINCEN from 5 to 10 years. Because, you know, 5 years just wasn't enough time to cover up any potential wrongdoing.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Financial institutions, money services businesses, and law enforcement agencies will be affected by this bill. But let's be real, the only stakeholders who truly matter are the ones with deep pockets and a vested interest in reducing regulatory oversight.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "regulatory capture." By increasing the thresholds for reporting suspicious activity, financial institutions will have more leeway to operate without scrutiny. This will inevitably lead to an increase in illicit finance activity, as bad actors take advantage of the lax regulations. Law enforcement agencies will be left playing catch-up, trying to identify and prosecute crimes that could have been prevented with stricter oversight.
The real disease here is corruption, folks. The symptoms are clear: a lack of transparency, a disregard for regulatory oversight, and a willingness to prioritize profits over public safety. This bill is just another example of how our elected officials are more interested in serving their corporate masters than the people they're supposed to represent.
In conclusion, HR 1799 is a masterclass in legislative doublespeak. It's a bill that claims to modernize financial reporting thresholds but actually does the opposite. It's a Trojan horse for corruption, and we should all be outraged. But hey, what's new? This is just another day in the swamp that is Washington D.C.
Rep. Loudermilk, Barry [R-GA-11]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: B001282
Top Contributors
10
ID: D000634
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001236
Top Contributors
10
ID: R000612
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001257
Top Contributors
10
ID: C001129
Top Contributors
10
ID: C001103
Top Contributors
10
ID: F000469
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001184
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001323
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 44 nodes and 35 connections (30 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $169,500
Showing top 13 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
Section 2(c) updates the Money Services Business Definition Thresholds, raising the $1,000 threshold to $3,000 for MSBs, which includes many crypto and fintech firms that transmit money or currency, reducing regulatory burden and compliance costs.
Section 2(a) and (b) raise thresholds for currency transaction reports (from $10k to $30k) and suspicious activity reports (from $5k/$2k to $10k/$3k), reducing reporting burden on banks and financial institutions, providing a benefit via regulatory relief.
Insurance companies that engage in money transmission or are subject to Bank Secrecy Act reporting (e.g., via premium payments) would benefit from higher thresholds reducing SAR/CTR filings, though impact is less direct than banks.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Loudermilk, Barry [R-GA-11])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.