The bill
Eastern Mediterranean Gateway Act
HR. 3307, 119th Congress — read as touching Defense Contractors.
Sponsored by
Rep. Schneider, Bradley Scott [D-IL-10]
ID: S001190
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 3307, 119th Congress — read as touching Defense Contractors.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
The alignment
This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 422-424 of the Mandate for Leadership.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 45 - 2.
January 20, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the geniuses in Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Eastern Mediterranean Gateway Act (HR 3307) claims to aim at strengthening energy security and defense capabilities in the region by increasing cooperation with countries in the Eastern Mediterranean. How quaint. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to counter China's Belt and Road Initiative and secure American interests in the region.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill is a laundry list of diplomatic initiatives, energy projects, and defense cooperation agreements. It institutionalizes multilateral strategic dialogues between the US and IMEC countries, prioritizes the Eastern Mediterranean region in US foreign policy, and mandates reports on implementation and multilateral initiatives. Oh, and let's not forget the obligatory nods to "energy security" and "defense cooperation." How original.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved: Greece, Israel, Cyprus, Egypt, India, and of course, the US. Each country has its own interests and motivations, but let's be real, this is all about American self-interest. The bill also mentions various energy projects, such as the Great Sea Interconnector and LNG terminals, which will undoubtedly benefit corporate interests.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a symptom of a deeper disease: America's addiction to interventionism and its desperate attempt to maintain global dominance. By propping up regional allies and investing in energy infrastructure, the US hopes to counterbalance China's growing influence. However, this strategy will only lead to further instability and conflict in the region.
In conclusion, HR 3307 is a cynical exercise in realpolitik, masquerading as a noble effort to promote "energy security" and "defense cooperation." The real purpose is to advance American interests, secure resources, and maintain regional influence. Don't be fooled by the rhetoric; this bill is just another example of the US playing global hegemon, with all the attendant risks and consequences.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this legislative farce unfold. Wake me up when something actually changes.
Rep. Schneider, Bradley Scott [D-IL-10]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: B001257
Top Contributors
10
ID: T000468
Top Contributors
10
ID: M000317
Top Contributors
10
ID: P000614
Top Contributors
10
ID: G000599
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001201
Top Contributors
10
ID: J000310
Top Contributors
10
ID: K000398
Top Contributors
10
ID: A000148
Top Contributors
10
ID: F000466
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 60 nodes and 35 connections (45 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $120,269
Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
Section 2 purpose and Section 5(b) prioritization of the Eastern Mediterranean region for defense cooperation indicate support for defense contractors working in the region.
Section 3 finding (3) mentions energy projects such as the Great Sea Interconnector and LNG terminals in the Eastern Mediterranean, which play a key role in European energy security, indicating support for energy infrastructure.
Section 3 finding (3) mentions energy projects, which could include oil and gas, as critical infrastructure for linking India, the Gulf, and Europe through the Eastern Mediterranean.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Schneider, Bradley Scott [D-IL-10])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.
— 389 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions policy and how it affects foreign policy, as well as the international energy landscape and how it affects U.S. national and economic security. l Develop a strategy for identifying and accessing resources and advancing U.S. economic interests. America has recently become a net energy exporter, but it still imports large amounts of essential energy resources such as oil and natural gas as well as such materials as uranium (including yellowcake), lithium, certain rare earth minerals, and energy generation and transmission components and technology. The United States needs a clear understanding of its global energy and economic interests and a strategy for protecting them. l Oppose “climate reparations.” During the November 2022 United Nations climate conference in Egypt, the Biden Administration and other “developed” countries agreed to provide “climate reparations” to developing countries for the harm allegedly caused by the developed countries’ use of fossil fuel.76 A reparations slush fund administered by a non-U.S. organization provides no assurance that U.S. interests will be protected and should not be supported in any form. New Policies l Identify U.S. energy security interests and promote American energy dominance. To this end, IA should work closely with the DESAS Office of Policy on the National Energy Security Strategy. l Strengthen the new DESAS vis-à-vis the Department of State. The State Department’s Bureau of Energy Resources has generally excluded IA from serious discussions of international affairs to the detriment of DOE and broader interagency policy development. In addition, DOE embassy representatives are generally excluded from giving policy advice to senior diplomats and are used merely as sources of information instead of being active advocates for the Secretary’s priorities. The Secretary of Energy is a senior member of the President’s National Security Council and should function as such. The DOE’s Deputy Secretaries, Under Secretaries, and Assistant Secretaries should be guaranteed representation at all Deputies and Policy Coordination Committee meetings. In addition, senior political and career staff should hold positions on the NSC staff equivalent to their counterparts at State, Defense, Treasury, and the Intelligence Community (IC). DESAS billets should replace State Department Bureau of Energy Resources billets at the relevant posts worldwide. — 390 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Stop “climate reparations.” The President should refuse to provide climate reparations under an unratified treaty, and IA should encourage other countries to reconsider their desire to provide reparations. ARCTIC ENERGY OFFICE (AE) Mission/Overview AE was established during the Trump Administration to create a central office overseeing U.S. Arctic interests in Alaska and the other Arctic nations in response to the growing strategic sensitivity of this geographic region and the natural resources it contains. It “serves as the principal advisor to the Under Secretary on all domestic Arctic issues, including energy, science, and national security.”77 Needed Reforms In October 2022, the Biden Administration released its National Strategy for the Arctic Region.78 Although recognizing national security threats in the Arctic, it also focuses heavily on climate change, sustainability, and international cooperation. The United States must establish a strategic plan to promote its national security, energy, and economic interests in the Arctic. An analysis and plan to support the responsible development of Alaska’s energy assets should be a priority. New Policies l Defend American interests in the Arctic Circle. The next Administration needs to define American strategic and economic interests in the Arctic Circle. AE should help to identify those interests, as well as threats posed by countries like Russia and China, and develop appropriate policy options for the President’s consideration. l Ensure that AE is clearly focused. In particular, this means identifying U.S. energy interests in the Arctic Circle, identifying foreign government and commercial interests and activity in the region, and ensuring that the United States does not forgo important energy and national security interests in the Arctic. l Expand AE’s operations in Alaska. AE’s operations in Alaska should be expanded to encompass broader national energy security interests in the region including rare earths, oil, and natural gas. AE should also be the lead for DOE Antarctic operations as a counter to growing Russian and Chinese interest in Antarctic resources.
— 389 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions policy and how it affects foreign policy, as well as the international energy landscape and how it affects U.S. national and economic security. l Develop a strategy for identifying and accessing resources and advancing U.S. economic interests. America has recently become a net energy exporter, but it still imports large amounts of essential energy resources such as oil and natural gas as well as such materials as uranium (including yellowcake), lithium, certain rare earth minerals, and energy generation and transmission components and technology. The United States needs a clear understanding of its global energy and economic interests and a strategy for protecting them. l Oppose “climate reparations.” During the November 2022 United Nations climate conference in Egypt, the Biden Administration and other “developed” countries agreed to provide “climate reparations” to developing countries for the harm allegedly caused by the developed countries’ use of fossil fuel.76 A reparations slush fund administered by a non-U.S. organization provides no assurance that U.S. interests will be protected and should not be supported in any form. New Policies l Identify U.S. energy security interests and promote American energy dominance. To this end, IA should work closely with the DESAS Office of Policy on the National Energy Security Strategy. l Strengthen the new DESAS vis-à-vis the Department of State. The State Department’s Bureau of Energy Resources has generally excluded IA from serious discussions of international affairs to the detriment of DOE and broader interagency policy development. In addition, DOE embassy representatives are generally excluded from giving policy advice to senior diplomats and are used merely as sources of information instead of being active advocates for the Secretary’s priorities. The Secretary of Energy is a senior member of the President’s National Security Council and should function as such. The DOE’s Deputy Secretaries, Under Secretaries, and Assistant Secretaries should be guaranteed representation at all Deputies and Policy Coordination Committee meetings. In addition, senior political and career staff should hold positions on the NSC staff equivalent to their counterparts at State, Defense, Treasury, and the Intelligence Community (IC). DESAS billets should replace State Department Bureau of Energy Resources billets at the relevant posts worldwide.
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.