The bill
Securing America’s Critical Minerals Supply Act
HR. 3617, 119th Congress — read as touching Oil & Gas.
Sponsored by
Rep. James, John [R-MI-10]
ID: J000307
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 3617, 119th Congress — read as touching Oil & Gas.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
25 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
The alignment
This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 398-400 of the Mandate for Leadership.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
February 11, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the real disease beneath.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Securing America's Critical Minerals Supply Act (HR 3617) claims to secure the supply of critical energy resources, including minerals and other materials essential to the US energy sector. How noble. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to justify more government intervention in the market, under the guise of "energy security."
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Department of Energy Organization Act to include critical energy resources as a priority area for the Secretary of Energy. It also requires ongoing assessments of the supply chain's vulnerability and diversity, because apparently, the free market can't handle that on its own. Oh, and it creates new reporting requirements, because bureaucrats love reports.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: energy companies, mining interests, and other industries that will benefit from government largesse. Don't worry, they'll be "consulted" in the process, which is just a euphemism for "lobbied extensively."
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Trojan horse for more government control over the energy sector. By defining critical energy resources as essential to national security, it paves the way for increased regulation and subsidies. The real beneficiaries will be the industries that can afford to lobby effectively, while small businesses and consumers will foot the bill.
Diagnosis: **Acute Crony Capitalism Syndrome**, with symptoms of bureaucratic overreach and a severe lack of faith in free market principles. Treatment: a healthy dose of skepticism and a strong stomach for the inevitable pork-barrel politics that will follow.
In short, this bill is a classic case of politicians trying to "solve" a problem they created themselves through their own incompetence and corruption. It's a shell game, folks. Don't be fooled by the fancy language and promises of "energy security." This is just another example of the government's addiction to meddling in the market, with disastrous consequences for everyone except the well-connected few.
Rep. James, John [R-MI-10]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 4 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: O000019
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001215
Top Contributors
10
ID: D000628
Top Contributors
10
ID: H001093
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 74 nodes and 37 connections (53 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $179,250
Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 6 helped.
Sec. 3(a)(1)(A)-(H) requires assessments of critical energy resource supply chains, which include oil and gas as energy resources essential to the energy sector; Sec. 3(a)(2)(B) facilitates increasing domestic production, separation, and processing of critical energy resources, which benefits oil and gas producers.
Electric utilities rely on stable supply of energy resources; Sec. 3(a)(1)(B)-(H) assessments of supply chain vulnerability and Sec. 3(a)(2) facilitating strategies to strengthen supply chains directly benefit electric utilities by ensuring reliable energy supply.
Pipelines and midstream infrastructure transport critical energy resources; Sec. 3(a)(1)(B)-(H) assessments of supply chain diversity and capacity constraints, and Sec. 3(a)(2)(A)-(B) diversifying sources and increasing domestic production benefit energy infrastructure by increasing throughput and reducing disruption risks.
Coal is an energy resource essential to the energy sector; Sec. 3(a)(1)(A)-(H) assessments and Sec. 3(a)(2)(B) increasing domestic production apply to coal as a critical energy resource, benefiting coal mining.
Renewable energy technologies (solar, wind, etc.) rely on critical minerals; Sec. 3(a)(1)(A) assessments of importance to development of energy technologies and Sec. 3(a)(3) developing substitutes and alternatives benefit renewable energy by securing supply chains for minerals used in renewables.
Nuclear power depends on critical minerals like uranium; Sec. 3(a)(1)(A)-(H) assessments and Sec. 3(a)(2)(B) increasing domestic production of critical energy resources benefit nuclear power.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. James, John [R-MI-10])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.
— 365 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions l Support repeal of massive spending bills like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)3 and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA),4 which established new programs and are providing hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies to renewable energy developers, their investors, and special interests, and support the rescinding of all funds not already spent by these programs. l Unleash private-sector energy innovation by ending government interference in energy decisions. l Stop the war on oil and natural gas. l Allow individuals, families, and business to use the energy resources they want to use and that will best serve their needs. l Secure and protect energy infrastructure from cyber and physical attacks. l Refocus the Department of Energy on energy security, accelerated remediation, and advanced science. l Promote U.S. energy resources as a means to assist our allies and diminish our strategic adversaries. l Refocus FERC on ensuring that customers have affordable and reliable electricity, natural gas, and oil and no longer allow it to favor special interests and progressive causes. l Ensure that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission facilitates rather than hampers private-sector nuclear energy innovation and deployment. American Science Dominance. Ever since the age of Benjamin Franklin, the United States has been at the forefront of scientific discovery and technological advancement. Beginning with the groundbreaking science of the Manhattan Proj- ect, the U.S. has developed 17 National Laboratories that conduct fundamental and advanced scientific research. The National Labs have been critical in supporting national defense and ensuring that the United States leads on scientific discoveries with transformative applications that benefit America and the world. In recent years, however, U.S. science has been under threat. Externally, adversaries like the Chinese military have been engaged in scientific espionage, infiltrating taxpayer-funded scientific research projects, and funding their own science research. In addition, the National Labs have been too focused on climate change and renewable technologies. — 366 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise American science dominance is critical to U.S. national security and economic strength. The next conservative President therefore needs to recommit the United States to ensuring this dominance. MISSION STATEMENT FOR A REFORMED DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY The Department of Energy should be renamed and refocused as the Department of Energy Security and Advanced Science (DESAS). DESAS would refocus on DOE’s five existing core missions: l Providing leadership and coordination on energy security and related national security issues, l Promoting U.S. energy economic interests abroad, l Leading the nation and the world in cutting-edge fundamental advanced science, l Remediating former Manhattan Project and Cold War nuclear material sites, and l Developing new nuclear weapons and naval nuclear reactors. These missions work together by using advanced science to promote national security while getting the government out of the business of picking winners and losers in energy resources. Reform is needed because DOE, instead of focusing on core energy and security issues, has been spending billions of taxpayer dollars to subsidize renewable energy developers and investors, thereby making Americans less energy secure and distorting energy markets. OVERVIEW DOE was created by the Department of Energy Organization Act of 19775 in response to the 1970s oil crisis, consolidating various energy programs that pre- viously had operated without coordination throughout the federal government in a single department. In addition to addressing energy issues, DOE is tasked with: l Engaging in basic and fundamental science and research through the 17 National Laboratories; l Cleaning up the Manhattan Project and Cold War nuclear material and weapons sites;
— 365 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions l Support repeal of massive spending bills like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)3 and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA),4 which established new programs and are providing hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies to renewable energy developers, their investors, and special interests, and support the rescinding of all funds not already spent by these programs. l Unleash private-sector energy innovation by ending government interference in energy decisions. l Stop the war on oil and natural gas. l Allow individuals, families, and business to use the energy resources they want to use and that will best serve their needs. l Secure and protect energy infrastructure from cyber and physical attacks. l Refocus the Department of Energy on energy security, accelerated remediation, and advanced science. l Promote U.S. energy resources as a means to assist our allies and diminish our strategic adversaries. l Refocus FERC on ensuring that customers have affordable and reliable electricity, natural gas, and oil and no longer allow it to favor special interests and progressive causes. l Ensure that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission facilitates rather than hampers private-sector nuclear energy innovation and deployment. American Science Dominance. Ever since the age of Benjamin Franklin, the United States has been at the forefront of scientific discovery and technological advancement. Beginning with the groundbreaking science of the Manhattan Proj- ect, the U.S. has developed 17 National Laboratories that conduct fundamental and advanced scientific research. The National Labs have been critical in supporting national defense and ensuring that the United States leads on scientific discoveries with transformative applications that benefit America and the world. In recent years, however, U.S. science has been under threat. Externally, adversaries like the Chinese military have been engaged in scientific espionage, infiltrating taxpayer-funded scientific research projects, and funding their own science research. In addition, the National Labs have been too focused on climate change and renewable technologies.
— 389 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions policy and how it affects foreign policy, as well as the international energy landscape and how it affects U.S. national and economic security. l Develop a strategy for identifying and accessing resources and advancing U.S. economic interests. America has recently become a net energy exporter, but it still imports large amounts of essential energy resources such as oil and natural gas as well as such materials as uranium (including yellowcake), lithium, certain rare earth minerals, and energy generation and transmission components and technology. The United States needs a clear understanding of its global energy and economic interests and a strategy for protecting them. l Oppose “climate reparations.” During the November 2022 United Nations climate conference in Egypt, the Biden Administration and other “developed” countries agreed to provide “climate reparations” to developing countries for the harm allegedly caused by the developed countries’ use of fossil fuel.76 A reparations slush fund administered by a non-U.S. organization provides no assurance that U.S. interests will be protected and should not be supported in any form. New Policies l Identify U.S. energy security interests and promote American energy dominance. To this end, IA should work closely with the DESAS Office of Policy on the National Energy Security Strategy. l Strengthen the new DESAS vis-à-vis the Department of State. The State Department’s Bureau of Energy Resources has generally excluded IA from serious discussions of international affairs to the detriment of DOE and broader interagency policy development. In addition, DOE embassy representatives are generally excluded from giving policy advice to senior diplomats and are used merely as sources of information instead of being active advocates for the Secretary’s priorities. The Secretary of Energy is a senior member of the President’s National Security Council and should function as such. The DOE’s Deputy Secretaries, Under Secretaries, and Assistant Secretaries should be guaranteed representation at all Deputies and Policy Coordination Committee meetings. In addition, senior political and career staff should hold positions on the NSC staff equivalent to their counterparts at State, Defense, Treasury, and the Intelligence Community (IC). DESAS billets should replace State Department Bureau of Energy Resources billets at the relevant posts worldwide.
Showing 3 of 5 policy matches
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.
Tradeable Energy Performance Standards Act
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers".
International Nuclear Energy Financing Act of 2025