Securing America’s Critical Minerals Supply Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/3617
Last Updated: July 12, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. James, John [R-MI-10]

ID: J000307

Follow the money

The bill

Securing America’s Critical Minerals Supply Act

HR. 3617, 119th Congress — read as touching Oil & Gas.

The sponsor

Rep. James, John [R-MI-10]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$137,550 raised

25 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

65% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 398-400 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

February 11, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the real disease beneath.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Securing America's Critical Minerals Supply Act (HR 3617) claims to secure the supply of critical energy resources, including minerals and other materials essential to the US energy sector. How noble. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to justify more government intervention in the market, under the guise of "energy security."

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Department of Energy Organization Act to include critical energy resources as a priority area for the Secretary of Energy. It also requires ongoing assessments of the supply chain's vulnerability and diversity, because apparently, the free market can't handle that on its own. Oh, and it creates new reporting requirements, because bureaucrats love reports.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: energy companies, mining interests, and other industries that will benefit from government largesse. Don't worry, they'll be "consulted" in the process, which is just a euphemism for "lobbied extensively."

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Trojan horse for more government control over the energy sector. By defining critical energy resources as essential to national security, it paves the way for increased regulation and subsidies. The real beneficiaries will be the industries that can afford to lobby effectively, while small businesses and consumers will foot the bill.

Diagnosis: **Acute Crony Capitalism Syndrome**, with symptoms of bureaucratic overreach and a severe lack of faith in free market principles. Treatment: a healthy dose of skepticism and a strong stomach for the inevitable pork-barrel politics that will follow.

In short, this bill is a classic case of politicians trying to "solve" a problem they created themselves through their own incompetence and corruption. It's a shell game, folks. Don't be fooled by the fancy language and promises of "energy security." This is just another example of the government's addiction to meddling in the market, with disastrous consequences for everyone except the well-connected few.

Related Topics

Energy Production & ConservationClimate Change & Sustainability
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. James, John [R-MI-10]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$137,550
24 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$5,250
Committees
$0
Individuals
$132,000

No PAC contributions found

1
PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,000
2
LAS VEGAS PAIUTE TRIBE
1 transaction
$1,000
3
MWR CONSULTING
1 transaction
$1,000
4
SABBYS LOUNGE
1 transaction
$250

No committee contributions found

1
UIHLEIN, RICHARD
2 transactions
$13,200
2
FAUST, ANNE
1 transaction
$6,600
3
COURTNEY, KRISTEN ANN
1 transaction
$6,600
4
DANIELS, GEORGE G.
1 transaction
$6,600
5
FAISON, JAY W.
1 transaction
$6,600
6
BRAY, STEVEN R.
1 transaction
$6,600
7
RICHARDS, DANIEL
1 transaction
$6,600
8
TOPPING, ROBERT
1 transaction
$6,600
9
GOETZ, CAROL
1 transaction
$6,600
10
GOETZ, JAMES
1 transaction
$6,600
11
GILLIAM, RICHARD
1 transaction
$6,600
12
SINGER, PAUL
1 transaction
$6,600
13
BRADLEY, JACQUELINE
1 transaction
$6,600
14
RICKETTS, J JOE
1 transaction
$6,600
15
SILVERMAN, JEFFREY
1 transaction
$6,600
16
VANDERSLOOT, BELINDA
1 transaction
$6,600
17
VANDERSLOOT, FRANK
1 transaction
$6,600
18
BARTLETT, PATRICIA
1 transaction
$6,600
19
KELLO, LEILA M.
1 transaction
$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 4 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]

ID: O000019

Top Contributors

10

1
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS
OrganizationTEMECULA, CA
$3,300
Dec 18, 2023
2
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA
$3,300
Nov 11, 2024
3
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationBANNING, CA
$3,300
Mar 31, 2024
4
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA
$3,300
Jun 6, 2023
5
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationBANNING, CA
$3,300
Jun 20, 2023
6
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$3,300
Jun 6, 2023
7
SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION
OrganizationEL CAJON, CA
$3,300
Apr 14, 2023
8
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA
$3,300
Sep 30, 2023
9
SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION
OrganizationEL CAJON, CA
$3,300
Sep 16, 2024
10
SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS
OrganizationPLACERVILLE, CA
$2,000
Oct 24, 2023

Rep. Miller-Meeks, Mariannette [R-IA-1]

ID: M001215

Top Contributors

10

1
SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA
COMTAMA, IA
$1,000
Aug 11, 2023
2
RENEWABLE ENERGY, CITIZENS FOR
COMMADISON, WI
$500
Aug 20, 2024
3
POLITICAL COMMITTEE, NWF ACTION FUND
PACWASHINGTON, DC
$500
Sep 18, 2024
4
US MARSHALS SERVICES
OrganizationNEW YORK, NY
$2,900
Apr 20, 2023
5
HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP
OrganizationRICHMOND, VA
$1,000
Mar 22, 2023
6
HOGAN, PATRICK F
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualDALLAS, TX
$13,200
Mar 15, 2023
7
HOLDEN, RONALD
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualWILLIAMSBURG, IA
$13,200
Jun 20, 2023
8
VANDEWALLE, LOLA L
SELF-EMPLOYEDENTREPRENEUR
IndividualBLUE GRASS, IA
$13,200
Oct 16, 2023
9
GLEESON, JOHN W
KLINGER COMPANIES, LLCCEO
IndividualSIOUX CITY, IA
$11,600
Feb 15, 2023
10
SMITH, DYAN
HOMEMAKERHOMEMAKER
IndividualNAPLES, FL
$10,000
May 13, 2024

Rep. Dunn, Neal P. [R-FL-2]

ID: D000628

Top Contributors

10

1
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
OrganizationATMORE, AL
$3,300
Aug 19, 2024
2
SHOOTS, KYLE MR.
SYSTEM SERVICE & ENGINEERING INCPRESIDENT
IndividualPANAMA CITY, FL
$10,000
Jun 18, 2024
3
CAMAISA, ALLAN
CALIDI BIOCHAIRMAN AND CEO
IndividualRANCHO SANTA FE, CA
$6,600
Apr 12, 2023
4
PERGOLINI, WILLIAM
AUDIENTIS LLCPRESIDENT
IndividualROSWELL, GA
$5,000
Sep 2, 2023
5
PERGOLINI, WILLIAM
AUDIENTIS LLCPRESIDENT
IndividualROSWELL, GA
$5,000
Sep 2, 2023
6
SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$5,000
Jun 5, 2024
7
SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN
BLACKSTONECEO AND CHAIRMAN
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$5,000
May 31, 2024
8
D'ISERNIA, MIRIAM A. MS
HOMEMAKERHOMEMAKER
IndividualPANAMA CITY BEACH, FL
$3,400
Sep 29, 2023
9
PERGOLINI, WILLIAM
IndividualROSWELL, GA
$3,400
Sep 29, 2023
10
SHOOTS, CHRISTINA MRS.
IndividualPANAMA CITY, FL
$3,400
Jun 18, 2024

Rep. Houchin, Erin [R-IN-9]

ID: H001093

Top Contributors

10

1
HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA
OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA
$3,300
Aug 3, 2023
2
OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
OrganizationRED ROCK, OK
$3,300
Aug 3, 2023
3
TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA OF NORTH DAKOTA
OrganizationBELCOURT, ND
$3,300
Aug 3, 2023
4
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$2,500
Dec 19, 2023
5
BANKE, BARBARA
JACKSON FAMILY FOUNDATIONEXECUTIVE
IndividualGEYSERVILLE, CA
$6,600
Dec 7, 2023
6
SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Mar 6, 2024
7
GRIFFIN, KENNETH
CITADEL LLCFOUNDER CEO
IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL
$6,600
Apr 10, 2023
8
ROWAN, CAROLYN
CAROLYN ROWAN COLLECTION LLCEXECUTIVE
IndividualGREENWICH, CT
$6,600
Jun 28, 2023
9
ROWAN, MARC
APOLLO MANAGEMENT HOLDINGSEXECUTIVE
IndividualGREENWICH, CT
$6,600
Jun 28, 2023
10
KIESLER, DOUGLAS M MR.
KIESLER POLICE SUPPLY, INC.CEO
IndividualGREENVILLE, IN
$6,600
Feb 22, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. James, John [R-MI-10]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 74 nodes and 37 connections (53 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $179,250

Top Donors - Rep. James, John [R-MI-10]

Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount

4 Orgs1 Committee19 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 6 helped.

  • +Oil & Gasconfidence 0.80

    Sec. 3(a)(1)(A)-(H) requires assessments of critical energy resource supply chains, which include oil and gas as energy resources essential to the energy sector; Sec. 3(a)(2)(B) facilitates increasing domestic production, separation, and processing of critical energy resources, which benefits oil and gas producers.

  • +Electric Utilitiesconfidence 0.80

    Electric utilities rely on stable supply of energy resources; Sec. 3(a)(1)(B)-(H) assessments of supply chain vulnerability and Sec. 3(a)(2) facilitating strategies to strengthen supply chains directly benefit electric utilities by ensuring reliable energy supply.

  • Pipelines and midstream infrastructure transport critical energy resources; Sec. 3(a)(1)(B)-(H) assessments of supply chain diversity and capacity constraints, and Sec. 3(a)(2)(A)-(B) diversifying sources and increasing domestic production benefit energy infrastructure by increasing throughput and reducing disruption risks.

  • +Coal Miningconfidence 0.70

    Coal is an energy resource essential to the energy sector; Sec. 3(a)(1)(A)-(H) assessments and Sec. 3(a)(2)(B) increasing domestic production apply to coal as a critical energy resource, benefiting coal mining.

  • +Renewable Energyconfidence 0.70

    Renewable energy technologies (solar, wind, etc.) rely on critical minerals; Sec. 3(a)(1)(A) assessments of importance to development of energy technologies and Sec. 3(a)(3) developing substitutes and alternatives benefit renewable energy by securing supply chains for minerals used in renewables.

  • +Nuclear Powerconfidence 0.70

    Nuclear power depends on critical minerals like uranium; Sec. 3(a)(1)(A)-(H) assessments and Sec. 3(a)(2)(B) increasing domestic production of critical energy resources benefit nuclear power.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. James, John [R-MI-10])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

  • from 2 contributions
    • TEMPLE, RICHARD$500
    • KASBAUM, JANICE L.$75
  • from 2 contributions
    • ADAMSOLEARY, THERESA$100
    • REW, DAVID$100

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.

Introduction

Moderate65.3%
Pages: 398-400

— 365 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions l Support repeal of massive spending bills like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)3 and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA),4 which established new programs and are providing hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies to renewable energy developers, their investors, and special interests, and support the rescinding of all funds not already spent by these programs. l Unleash private-sector energy innovation by ending government interference in energy decisions. l Stop the war on oil and natural gas. l Allow individuals, families, and business to use the energy resources they want to use and that will best serve their needs. l Secure and protect energy infrastructure from cyber and physical attacks. l Refocus the Department of Energy on energy security, accelerated remediation, and advanced science. l Promote U.S. energy resources as a means to assist our allies and diminish our strategic adversaries. l Refocus FERC on ensuring that customers have affordable and reliable electricity, natural gas, and oil and no longer allow it to favor special interests and progressive causes. l Ensure that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission facilitates rather than hampers private-sector nuclear energy innovation and deployment. American Science Dominance. Ever since the age of Benjamin Franklin, the United States has been at the forefront of scientific discovery and technological advancement. Beginning with the groundbreaking science of the Manhattan Proj- ect, the U.S. has developed 17 National Laboratories that conduct fundamental and advanced scientific research. The National Labs have been critical in supporting national defense and ensuring that the United States leads on scientific discoveries with transformative applications that benefit America and the world. In recent years, however, U.S. science has been under threat. Externally, adversaries like the Chinese military have been engaged in scientific espionage, infiltrating taxpayer-funded scientific research projects, and funding their own science research. In addition, the National Labs have been too focused on climate change and renewable technologies. — 366 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise American science dominance is critical to U.S. national security and economic strength. The next conservative President therefore needs to recommit the United States to ensuring this dominance. MISSION STATEMENT FOR A REFORMED DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY The Department of Energy should be renamed and refocused as the Department of Energy Security and Advanced Science (DESAS). DESAS would refocus on DOE’s five existing core missions: l Providing leadership and coordination on energy security and related national security issues, l Promoting U.S. energy economic interests abroad, l Leading the nation and the world in cutting-edge fundamental advanced science, l Remediating former Manhattan Project and Cold War nuclear material sites, and l Developing new nuclear weapons and naval nuclear reactors. These missions work together by using advanced science to promote national security while getting the government out of the business of picking winners and losers in energy resources. Reform is needed because DOE, instead of focusing on core energy and security issues, has been spending billions of taxpayer dollars to subsidize renewable energy developers and investors, thereby making Americans less energy secure and distorting energy markets. OVERVIEW DOE was created by the Department of Energy Organization Act of 19775 in response to the 1970s oil crisis, consolidating various energy programs that pre- viously had operated without coordination throughout the federal government in a single department. In addition to addressing energy issues, DOE is tasked with: l Engaging in basic and fundamental science and research through the 17 National Laboratories; l Cleaning up the Manhattan Project and Cold War nuclear material and weapons sites;

Introduction

Moderate65.3%
Pages: 398-400

— 365 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions l Support repeal of massive spending bills like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)3 and Inflation Reduction Act (IRA),4 which established new programs and are providing hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies to renewable energy developers, their investors, and special interests, and support the rescinding of all funds not already spent by these programs. l Unleash private-sector energy innovation by ending government interference in energy decisions. l Stop the war on oil and natural gas. l Allow individuals, families, and business to use the energy resources they want to use and that will best serve their needs. l Secure and protect energy infrastructure from cyber and physical attacks. l Refocus the Department of Energy on energy security, accelerated remediation, and advanced science. l Promote U.S. energy resources as a means to assist our allies and diminish our strategic adversaries. l Refocus FERC on ensuring that customers have affordable and reliable electricity, natural gas, and oil and no longer allow it to favor special interests and progressive causes. l Ensure that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission facilitates rather than hampers private-sector nuclear energy innovation and deployment. American Science Dominance. Ever since the age of Benjamin Franklin, the United States has been at the forefront of scientific discovery and technological advancement. Beginning with the groundbreaking science of the Manhattan Proj- ect, the U.S. has developed 17 National Laboratories that conduct fundamental and advanced scientific research. The National Labs have been critical in supporting national defense and ensuring that the United States leads on scientific discoveries with transformative applications that benefit America and the world. In recent years, however, U.S. science has been under threat. Externally, adversaries like the Chinese military have been engaged in scientific espionage, infiltrating taxpayer-funded scientific research projects, and funding their own science research. In addition, the National Labs have been too focused on climate change and renewable technologies.

Introduction

Moderate64.2%
Pages: 422-424

— 389 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions policy and how it affects foreign policy, as well as the international energy landscape and how it affects U.S. national and economic security. l Develop a strategy for identifying and accessing resources and advancing U.S. economic interests. America has recently become a net energy exporter, but it still imports large amounts of essential energy resources such as oil and natural gas as well as such materials as uranium (including yellowcake), lithium, certain rare earth minerals, and energy generation and transmission components and technology. The United States needs a clear understanding of its global energy and economic interests and a strategy for protecting them. l Oppose “climate reparations.” During the November 2022 United Nations climate conference in Egypt, the Biden Administration and other “developed” countries agreed to provide “climate reparations” to developing countries for the harm allegedly caused by the developed countries’ use of fossil fuel.76 A reparations slush fund administered by a non-U.S. organization provides no assurance that U.S. interests will be protected and should not be supported in any form. New Policies l Identify U.S. energy security interests and promote American energy dominance. To this end, IA should work closely with the DESAS Office of Policy on the National Energy Security Strategy. l Strengthen the new DESAS vis-à-vis the Department of State. The State Department’s Bureau of Energy Resources has generally excluded IA from serious discussions of international affairs to the detriment of DOE and broader interagency policy development. In addition, DOE embassy representatives are generally excluded from giving policy advice to senior diplomats and are used merely as sources of information instead of being active advocates for the Secretary’s priorities. The Secretary of Energy is a senior member of the President’s National Security Council and should function as such. The DOE’s Deputy Secretaries, Under Secretaries, and Assistant Secretaries should be guaranteed representation at all Deputies and Policy Coordination Committee meetings. In addition, senior political and career staff should hold positions on the NSC staff equivalent to their counterparts at State, Defense, Treasury, and the Intelligence Community (IC). DESAS billets should replace State Department Bureau of Energy Resources billets at the relevant posts worldwide.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills