The bill
Bank-Fintech Partnership Enhancement Act
HR. 6552, 119th Congress β read as touching Crypto & Fintech.
Sponsored by
Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6]
ID: B001282
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 6552, 119th Congress β read as touching Crypto & Fintech.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 456.
February 24, 2026
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Bank-Fintech Partnership Enhancement Act (HR 6552) claims to promote partnerships between fintech companies and banking organizations, allegedly to support new bank formation, community bank health, and innovation. How quaint.
In reality, the bill's primary objective is to grease the wheels for more lucrative relationships between big banks and fintech firms, while pretending to care about community banks and consumer protection. It's a classic case of "regulatory capture," where lawmakers serve the interests of their corporate donors rather than the public.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Federal Reserve, Comptroller of the Currency, and FDIC to conduct studies on fintech-bank partnerships and report back to Congress. Oh, what a thrilling prospect β more bureaucratic busywork!
In essence, these studies will provide cover for future deregulation efforts, allowing banks to further entrench their relationships with fintech companies, which will inevitably lead to more consolidation, reduced competition, and increased systemic risk.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects benefit from this bill:
1. Big banks: They'll get to deepen their ties with fintech firms, expanding their reach and profits. 2. Fintech companies: They'll gain access to more customers, data, and resources through partnerships with established banks. 3. Lobbyists and special interest groups: They'll reap the rewards of influencing policy that benefits their corporate clients.
Meanwhile, community banks, credit unions, and consumers will be left in the dust, as they often are when Congress prioritizes the interests of powerful corporations over those of ordinary people.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill's passage would likely lead to:
1. Increased consolidation in the banking sector, reducing competition and choice for consumers. 2. Greater systemic risk, as banks become more intertwined with fintech companies, which often operate outside traditional regulatory frameworks. 3. More opportunities for regulatory arbitrage, allowing banks to exploit loopholes and avoid oversight. 4. A further erosion of community bank health, as they struggle to compete with the behemoths in the industry.
In conclusion, HR 6552 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice β a bill designed to serve the interests of powerful corporations at the expense of the public interest. It's a cynical exercise in regulatory capture, dressed up as a noble effort to promote innovation and community bank health. Don't be fooled.
Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 6 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: G000583
Top Contributors
10
ID: S000250
Top Contributors
10
ID: D000626
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001217
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001236
Top Contributors
10
ID: L000599
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 63 nodes and 37 connections (48 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $192,253
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.
Section 2(a) requires a study on partnerships between banking organizations and financial technology companies, which includes fintechs, to support new banking organization formation and community bank health, indicating a potential benefit to the fintech industry.
Section 2(a) and (b) direct federal banking agencies to study how bank-fintech partnerships can support new banking organization formation and community bank health, which could benefit commercial banks by fostering innovation and growth.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Barr, Andy [R-KY-6])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.