Combating Trafficking in Transportation Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/1442

Last Updated: September 7, 2026

Combating Trafficking in Transportation Act

S. 1442, 119th Congress — read as touching Surface Transportation.

The sponsor

Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$166,000 raised

26 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

70% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Health and Human Services" section, p. 533-535 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 184.

October 13, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Bill Analysis: S 1442 - Combating Trafficking in Transportation Act**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect this bill through the lens of wealth creation and regulatory efficiency.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Combating Trafficking in Transportation Act aims to combat human trafficking by installing awareness signs at rest stops and welcome centers along the Interstate System. While noble in intent, this bill's true impact will be felt in the realm of bureaucratic expansion and potential regulatory overreach.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. Amends title 49, United States Code, to allow for eligibility for projects installing human trafficking awareness signs at rest stops. 2. Expands the Department of Transportation Advisory Committee on Human Trafficking to include state departments of transportation representatives. 3. Modifies the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program to include projects described in section 6702(a)(3)(H) of title 49.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. State departments of transportation 2. Rest stop and welcome center operators 3. Human trafficking awareness organizations 4. The Department of Transportation

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill's true significance lies in its potential to create new regulatory hurdles for the transportation industry. By expanding the scope of human trafficking awareness initiatives, this legislation may lead to increased compliance costs and bureaucratic red tape.

From a business perspective, I see opportunities for innovative companies to capitalize on the installation and maintenance of these awareness signs. However, I also foresee potential drawbacks, such as:

* Increased regulatory burdens on transportation operators * Potential liability concerns related to human trafficking awareness initiatives * Unintended consequences stemming from expanded bureaucratic oversight

As a thought leader in the techno-libertarian sphere, I believe that this bill's impact will be felt most profoundly in the realm of regulatory efficiency. By expanding government oversight and creating new compliance requirements, this legislation may inadvertently stifle innovation and hinder economic growth.

**Projections:** I estimate that this bill's implementation will result in a 5-10% increase in compliance costs for affected transportation operators. Conversely, I project a 15-20% growth opportunity for companies specializing in human trafficking awareness initiatives and sign installation/maintenance services.

In conclusion, while the Combating Trafficking in Transportation Act may be well-intentioned, its true impact will be felt in the realm of regulatory efficiency and economic growth. As a visionary entrepreneur, I will continue to monitor this legislation's progress and capitalize on emerging opportunities in the transportation sector.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through the legislative process before it can become an actual law.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Combating Trafficking in Transportation Act (S. 1442) aims to combat human trafficking by increasing awareness and providing resources for transportation-related projects. The main objective is to allow for eligibility of projects that install human trafficking awareness signs at rest stops along the Interstate System.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill amends title 49, United States Code, to include human trafficking awareness signage as an eligible project under local and regional project assistance (Section 6702). It also adds a new provision to the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (Section 133) to include projects described in Section 6702(a)(3)(H).

Furthermore, the bill amends the Combating Human Trafficking in Commercial Vehicles Act (Public Law 115-99) by increasing the number of members on the Department of Transportation Advisory Committee on Human Trafficking from 15 to 16 and adding a representative from state departments of transportation.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The affected parties include:

* The Department of Transportation * State departments of transportation * Rest stop operators along the Interstate System * Organizations working to combat human trafficking

**Potential Impact & Implications**

If passed, this bill could lead to increased awareness about human trafficking among travelers and potentially reduce instances of trafficking. However, as we learned in civics class, the actual impact depends on various factors, including funding, implementation, and enforcement.

Now, I'm sure you're all aware that bills often undergo changes during the legislative process, but it's essential to understand the basics of how a bill becomes a law. Remember when we learned about committees, markups, and amendments? This bill has already gone through some of those steps, as indicated by the "Reported with an amendment" notation.

I hope this summary helps you understand the Combating Trafficking in Transportation Act. Next time, maybe take a refresher course on middle school civics before we dive into more complex legislative topics...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on this so-called "Combating Trafficking in Transportation Act" (S 1442). Now, at first glance, it seems like a noble effort to combat human trafficking by installing awareness signs at rest stops. But, let me tell you, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill aims to amend title 49 of the United States Code to allow for eligibility for projects that install human trafficking awareness signs at rest stops and welcome centers along the Interstate System. Sounds simple enough, right? But what about the real purpose?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Here's where it gets interesting:

* The bill amends Section 6702 of title 49, United States Code, to include human trafficking awareness signage as an eligible project for local and regional project assistance. * It also adds a new provision to the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (Section 133(b) of title 23), making projects described in section 6702(a)(3)(H) eligible for funding.

Now, pay attention: this bill doesn't just stop at awareness signs. Oh no! It's about expanding the scope of government control over transportation infrastructure. Think about it – with these new provisions, the feds can now dictate what kind of signage is allowed on our highways and byways.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Who benefits from this bill? Well, for starters:

* The Department of Transportation gets to expand its advisory committee on human trafficking, adding state departments of transportation as members. That's right; more bureaucrats, more control. * State governments will have a say in the matter, but only if they play ball with the feds.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Here's where it gets really interesting:

* With this bill, we're essentially giving the government carte blanche to monitor and control our transportation infrastructure. Think surveillance cameras, data collection, and who-knows-what else. * The real agenda might not be about combating human trafficking at all; maybe it's just a Trojan horse for more government overreach.

Now, I know what you're thinking: "But Uncle [Your Name], this is just a bill to help combat human trafficking!" Ah, yes, that's what they want you to think. Wake up, folks! This is about control, plain and simple.

So, there you have it – my analysis of S 1442. Take it for what it's worth.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, we've got another one of those "bipartisan" bills that's just a Trojan horse for more government overreach and elitist control. I'm talking about S 1442, the Combating Trafficking in Transportation Act. (Sarcastic tone) Oh boy, who wouldn't want to combat human trafficking? Sounds like a noble cause... until you dig into the details.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's main objective is to amend title 49 of the United States Code to allow for eligibility for projects that install human trafficking awareness signs at rest stops. (Air quotes) "Awareness" signs, folks. Because we all know how effective those are in preventing crime. I mean, who needs actual law enforcement when you've got a sign?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Combating Human Trafficking in Commercial Vehicles Act by adding new provisions for human trafficking awareness signage at rest stops and welcome centers along the Interstate System. It also establishes an advisory committee on human trafficking within the Department of Transportation, which will include representatives from state departments of transportation.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The bill affects various stakeholders, including:

* State departments of transportation * The Department of Transportation * Rest stop operators (because who doesn't love a good sign?) * And, of course, the "elites" who get to decide what's best for us common folk

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, here's where it gets interesting. On the surface, this bill seems harmless, even noble. But think about it, folks. This is just another example of government overreach, dictating how we should be "aware" of human trafficking. What's next? Mandatory sensitivity training at every rest stop?

And let's not forget the advisory committee on human trafficking. Because what we really need is more bureaucracy and more unelected officials telling us what to do.

In conclusion, S 1442 is just another example of how our government loves to "help" us by taking away our freedom and imposing its will on us. (Wink) But hey, at least they're trying to combat human trafficking... with signs.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another bill that's about as effective as a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. Let's dissect this mess.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Combating Trafficking in Transportation Act (S 1442) claims to combat human trafficking by installing awareness signs at rest stops and welcome centers along the Interstate System. Wow, what a bold move. I'm sure the traffickers are shaking in their boots.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

* Amends title 49 of the United States Code to allow for eligibility for projects that install human trafficking awareness signs. * Expands the Department of Transportation Advisory Committee on Human Trafficking to include state departments of transportation representatives. * Modifies the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program to include projects described in section 6702(a)(3)(H) of title 49.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

* The Department of Transportation (because they need more bureaucracy) * State departments of transportation (because they're not busy enough) * Rest stop and welcome center operators (who will have to deal with the added "awareness" signage) * Human trafficking victims (who will still be trafficked, but now with a nice sign nearby)

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

This bill is a perfect example of legislative theater. It's a feel-good measure that does nothing to address the root causes of human trafficking. The signs might raise awareness among travelers, but they won't stop traffickers. In fact, they might even provide a false sense of security.

The real impact will be on the taxpayers, who will foot the bill for these signs and the bureaucratic machinery that comes with them. And let's not forget the politicians who will use this bill as a photo op to pretend they're doing something about human trafficking.

In short, this bill is a symptom of a deeper disease: the inability of politicians to address complex problems with meaningful solutions. Instead, they opt for superficial fixes that make them look good but accomplish nothing. It's like putting a Band-Aid on a bullet wound and calling it a day.

Diagnosis: Legislative Theater-itis, a chronic condition characterized by the tendency to prioritize appearances over substance. Treatment: a healthy dose of skepticism and a strong stomach for the absurdity of it all.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

Let's break down this bill, S 1442, the Combating Trafficking in Transportation Act. I'll give you the lowdown on what it's all about.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

This bill is all about combating human trafficking, bro. It aims to raise awareness and prevent trafficking by installing signs at rest stops along highways. The main objective is to educate travelers about the warning signs of human trafficking and provide resources for reporting suspicious activity.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill makes some key changes to existing law:

* Allows for eligibility for projects that install human trafficking awareness signs at rest stops * Amends the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program to include these types of projects * Expands the Department of Transportation Advisory Committee on Human Trafficking to include state departments of transportation

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This bill affects several parties, including:

* Travelers and truckers who use highways and rest stops * State departments of transportation responsible for installing signs * The Department of Transportation, which will oversee the program * Anti-human trafficking organizations and advocates

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The potential impact is huge, bro. By raising awareness about human trafficking, we can prevent more cases from happening. These signs could be a game-changer for victims who might not know how to escape or report their situation.

However, there are some implications to consider:

* Funding: Who's gonna pay for these signs and the program? * Effectiveness: Will these signs actually make a difference in preventing human trafficking? * Coordination: How will state departments of transportation work with federal agencies to implement this program?

Overall, this bill is a step in the right direction, but we gotta keep it real about the challenges ahead. It's gonna take some effort and coordination to make this program effective.

Anyway, that's my two cents on S 1442, bro. Hope you found this summary chill and informative!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: S 1442 - Combating Trafficking in Transportation Act**

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The Combating Trafficking in Transportation Act (S 1442) aims to combat human trafficking by increasing awareness and providing resources for transportation-related projects. The bill's primary objective is to allow for the installation of human trafficking awareness signs at rest stops along the Interstate System.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

1. **Eligibility for Human Trafficking Awareness Signs**: The bill amends Section 6702 of title 49, United States Code, to include projects for installing human trafficking awareness signs at rest stops as eligible for funding under the Local and Regional Project Assistance program. 2. **Surface Transportation Block Grant Program**: The bill adds a new category (25) to Section 133(b) of title 23, United States Code, allowing projects described in section 6702(a)(3)(H) of title 49 to be eligible for funding under the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program. 3. **Department of Transportation Advisory Committee on Human Trafficking**: The bill amends Section 5 of the Combating Human Trafficking in Commercial Vehicles Act (Public Law 115-99; 131 Stat. 2243) by increasing the number of committee members from 15 to 16 and adding a representative from state departments of transportation.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

1. **Transportation Industry**: The bill affects the transportation industry, particularly trucking companies and rest stop operators, as they will be required to install human trafficking awareness signs. 2. **State Departments of Transportation**: State departments of transportation will have a representative on the Department of Transportation Advisory Committee on Human Trafficking. 3. **Human Trafficking Organizations**: Anti-human trafficking organizations may benefit from increased funding for projects related to combating human trafficking.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

1. **Increased Awareness**: The installation of human trafficking awareness signs at rest stops may increase public awareness about human trafficking and potentially lead to more reports of suspected cases. 2. **Additional Funding**: The bill's provisions may result in additional funding for transportation-related projects aimed at combating human trafficking. 3. **Regulatory Compliance**: Transportation companies and rest stop operators will need to comply with the new regulations, which may require additional resources and investments.

**Monied Interest Analysis**

While there are no explicit PAC or industry lobby groups directly backing this bill, it is likely that organizations focused on anti-human trafficking efforts and transportation-related industries have influenced the legislation. The Trucking Industry Defense Association (TIDA) and the American Trucking Associations (ATA) may have provided input on the bill's provisions related to the transportation industry.

**Committee Capture and Conflicts of Interest**

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation has jurisdiction over this bill. While there are no apparent conflicts of interest among committee members, it is worth noting that Senator Blackburn, one of the bill's sponsors, has received campaign contributions from

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$166,000

23 donors

PACs

$5,000

Organizations

$7,900

Committees

Individuals

$153,100

FRIENDS OF COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY PAC

1 transaction

$5,000

THE COGGIN GROUP

2 transactions

$5,400

DOSS BROTHERS FARM

2 transactions

$2,000

BL PARTNERS GROUP LLC

1 transaction

$500

No committee contributions found

KING, RODNEY W.

1 transaction

$13,200

KINNEY, CHRIS

2 transactions

$13,200

BEAN, BILL G.

1 transaction

$10,000

SMITH, THOMAS

1 transaction

$10,000

GAMBLE, KATHRYN

1 transaction

$9,900

NEWVERRY, KARMA

1 transaction

$9,900

WETHERINGTON, WILLIAM MICHAEL MR.

1 transaction

$7,600

HAMPTON, GEORGE

1 transaction

$6,700

HARWELL, SAMUEL K. MR. IV

1 transaction

$6,600

HARWELL, SAMUEL K.

1 transaction

$6,600

KING, MARY L.

1 transaction

$6,600

SENSING, LUCY T. MRS.

1 transaction

$6,600

VITAL, GREG A.

1 transaction

$6,600

BRADLEY, JACQUELINE

1 transaction

$6,600

PRESTON, CASEY MS.

1 transaction

$6,600

DEVOS, BETSY

1 transaction

$6,600

DEVOS, DANIEL G. MR.

1 transaction

$6,600

DEVOS, DOUGLAS L. MR.

1 transaction

$6,600

DEVOS, RICHARD M. JR.

1 transaction

$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 4 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN]

ID: K000367

Top Contributors

LEECH LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE

OrganizationCASS LAKE, MN

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$3,300

Aug 25, 2023

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$2,500

Oct 7, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$2,300

Jul 17, 2023

ARISTOTLE INTERNATIONAL

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Jul 19, 2024

SMITH, BRADFORD

MICROSOFT CORPORATION • ATTORNEY

IndividualBELLEVUE, WA

$6,600

Mar 30, 2023

SMITH, BRADFORD

IndividualBELLEVUE, WA

$6,600

Mar 30, 2023

BADEN, DREW

PROFESSOR • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$6,600

Feb 23, 2024

CAUCHY, CONSTANCE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualMIDLAND, MI

$6,600

Jun 2, 2024

BADEN, DREW

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$6,600

Mar 11, 2024

Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

ID: C001056

Top Contributors

WINRED

COMARLINGTON, VA

$47

Jul 10, 2024

WEEKLEY, RICHARD W

WEEKLEY PROPERTIES • REAL ESTATE BROKER/DEVELOPER

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$100,000

Dec 27, 2023

MCINGVALE, JAMES F

GALLERY FURNITURE • OWNER/OPERATOR

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$50,000

Feb 27, 2023

MCINGVALE, LINDA

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$50,000

Feb 27, 2023

DUNN, TIMOTHY

CROWN QUEST OPERATING • EXECUTIVE

IndividualMIDLAND, TX

$45,000

Apr 4, 2023

MARTIN, KIMBERLY R

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$20,000

Mar 13, 2023

BLAINE, JAY C.

N/A • N/A

IndividualROCKWALL, TX

$16,478

Oct 11, 2024

THOMPSON, JERE W. MR. JR.

AMBIT ENERGY • CEO

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$13,200

Mar 15, 2023

MIDDLETON, MAYES

MIDDLETON OIL CO • OIL AND GAS

IndividualGALVESTON, TX

$12,500

Jan 7, 2023

MIDDLETON, MACEY

IndividualGALVESTON, TX

$12,500

Jan 7, 2023

Sen. Cortez Masto, Catherine [D-NV]

ID: C001113

Top Contributors

LAS VEGAS PAIUTE TRIBE

OrganizationLAS VEGAS, NV

$3,300

Nov 28, 2023

MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$2,500

Dec 20, 2023

ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE

OrganizationLIVINGSTON, TX

$1,500

Oct 2, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Apr 26, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jul 11, 2023

MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION

OrganizationOKMULGEE, OK

$1,000

Sep 18, 2024

MOHEGAN TRIBE OF INDIANS OF CONNECTICUT

OrganizationUNCASVILLE, CT

$1,000

Aug 12, 2024

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$550

Oct 2, 2023

LONGTIN, LUANN

IndividualPOTOMAC, MD

$17,325

Jun 30, 2024

SLIFKA, ROSALYN

IndividualWALTHAM, MA

$5,800

Jun 30, 2024

Sen. Warnock, Raphael G. [D-GA]

ID: W000790

Top Contributors

JME GROUP

OrganizationSTONE MOUNTAIN, GA

$2,900

Jun 30, 2023

JME GROUP

OrganizationSTONE MOUNTAIN, GA

$2,900

Jul 18, 2024

PORTFOLIO ONE

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$1,250

Mar 17, 2023

MCKENNEY HOUSE LLC

OrganizationFORT WASHINGTON, MD

$1,000

Jun 30, 2023

WATKINS WATKINS & WATKINS LLC

OrganizationCARROLLTON, GA

$1,000

Feb 17, 2023

SCR CONSULTING LLC

OrganizationATLANTA, GA

$500

Feb 17, 2023

GIBSON, DAVID H.

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$26,750

Mar 31, 2023

ROBBINS, BONNIE

IndividualSEATTLE, WA

$12,118

Mar 31, 2023

ROBBINS, BONNIE

IndividualSEATTLE, WA

$12,118

Jul 18, 2024

KERR, WILLIAM G.

IndividualOKLAHOMA CITY, OK

$9,625

Mar 31, 2023

Donor Network - Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 47 nodes and 55 connections

Total contributions: $55

Top Donors - Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN]

Showing top 23 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC3 Orgs19 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.

+Surface Transportationconfidence 0.90
SEC. 2 amends title 49 to allow eligibility for projects installing human trafficking awareness signs at rest stops and welcome centers along the Interstate System, and adds such projects to the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program, benefiting surface transportation infrastructure stakeholders.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Blackburn, Marsha [R-TN])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Surface Transportation$840
from 16 contributions
- MOYNIHAN, PATRICK$250
- LAO, CELY Y.$165
- COX, ILA MAE$150
- MCKNIGHT, KEITH W.$115
- LANGHAM, BILL$100

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Health and Human Services

Moderate

Vector: 59%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 policy address human trafficking; the bill focuses on transportation‑sector awareness while Project 2025 includes the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act and related HHS initiatives, showing moderate thematic overlap."

Key themes:human traffickingvictim protectionawareness/preventionfederal coordination

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Department of Homeland Security

Weak

Vector: 58%

Pages: 183-185AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on raising human trafficking awareness through transportation infrastructure, while the Project 2025 DHS section centers on immigration enforcement, border restrictions, and limiting asylum pathways; they share only a tangential concern with human trafficking and law enforcement coordination."

Key themes:human traffickinglaw enforcement coordinationvictim assistancetransportation security

— 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government. — 152 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Designate USCIS as Intelligence Community–adjacent, ensuring that it has access to national security and law enforcement databases. 4. Rescind all memoranda limiting enforcement of immigration laws including those identifying sensitive zones. 5. End ICE’s widespread use of termination and administrative closure of cases in immigration court. l Averting or curtailing a mass migration event 1. Provide that whenever the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that an actual or anticipated mass migration of aliens en route to or arriving off the coast of the U.S. presents urgent circumstances requiring an immediate federal response, the Secretary may make, subject to the approval of the President, rules and regulations prohibiting in whole or in part the introduction of persons from such countries or places as he or she shall designate in order to avert or curtail such mass migration and for such period of time as is deemed necessary, including through the expulsion of such aliens. Such rule and regulation making shall not be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act. 2. Provide that notwithstanding any other provision of law, when the Secretary makes such a determination and then promulgates, subject to the approval of the President, such rules and regulations, the Secretary shall have the authority to waive all legal requirements of Title 8 that the Secretary, in his or her sole discretion, determines are necessary to avert or curtail the mass migration. Subregulatory Matters l USCIS priorities/structural changes 1. Ensure that focus is returned to vetting, base eligibility of applicants, and fraud detection. 2. Realign the Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) to ensure agencywide consistency on implementation of fraud detection and vetting policies. 3. Review and repeal any internal agency memo that is inconsistent with the priorities described in this chapter.

Department of Transportation

Weak

Vector: 58%

Pages: 673-675AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill addresses human trafficking awareness at transportation facilities, which is only tangentially related to Project 2025's DOT focus on deregulation, infrastructure investment, and reducing DEIA initiatives; there is limited overlap in safety and state coordination themes."

Key themes:transportation safetypublic awarenessstate coordinationhuman trafficking prevention

— 640 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2023 Budget Highlights, p. 1, https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot. gov/files/2022-03/Budget_Highlights_FY2023.pdf (accessed March 3, 2023). 2. U.S. Department of Transportation, DEIA [Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility] Strategic Plan FY22– FY26, p. 2, https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2022-09/DOT%20DEIA%20Strategic%20Plan. pdf (accessed March 3, 2023). 3. 23 U.S. Code §§ 601–609, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/23 (accessed March 3, 2023). 4. U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary, “Administrative Rulemaking, Guidance, and Enforcement Procedures,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 248 (December 27, 2019), pp. 71714–71734, https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/regulations/361831/fed-reg-published-final-admin- rule.pdf (accessed March 3, 2023). 5. U.S. Department of Transportation, Build America Bureau, “About the Build America Bureau,” last updated October 24, 2022, https://www.transportation.gov/buildamerica/about (accessed March 3, 2023). 6. S. 622, Energy Policy and Conservation Act, Public Law No. 94-163, 94th Congress, December 22, 1995, https:// www.congress.gov/94/statute/STATUTE-89/STATUTE-89-Pg871.pdf (accessed March 3, 2023). 7. 42 U.S. Code Chapter 85, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/chapter-85 (accessed March 3, 2023). 8. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, “Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards for Model Years 2024–2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 84 (May 2, 2022), pp. 25710–26092, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-05- 02/pdf/2022-07200.pdf (accessed March 10, 2023). 9. U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary, “Defining Unfair or Deceptive Practices,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 235 (December 7, 2020), pp. 78707–78718, https://www.transportation.gov/ sites/dot.gov/files/2020-12/Defining%20Unfair%20or%20Deceptive%20Practices%20Final%20Rule%20-%20 85%20FR%2078707.pdf (accessed March 3, 2023). 10. U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary, “Procedures in Regulating Unfair or Deceptive Practices,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 22 (February 2, 2022), pp. 5655–5659, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-02-02/pdf/2022-01589.pdf (accessed March 3, 2023). 11. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Budget Estimates Fiscal Year 2023, p. 1, https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2022-04/FAA_Budget_Estimates_FY2023.pdf (accessed March 3, 2023). 12. Robert W. Poole, Jr., Organization and Innovation in Air Traffic Control, Hudson Institute Initiative on Future Innovation, November 2013, https://www.hudson.org/sites/default/files/researchattachments/ attachment/1199/poole_hi_res.pdf (accessed March 3, 2023). Also published subsequently as Reason Foundation Policy Study No. 431, January 2014, https://reason.org/wp-content/uploads/files/air_traffic_ control_organization_innovation.pdf (accessed March 3, 2023). 13. H.R. 3684, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law No. 117-58, 117th Congress, November 15, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ58/PLAW-117publ58.pdf (accessed March 3, 2023). 14. S. 6, Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, Public Law 88-365, 88th Congress, July 9, 1964, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-78/pdf/STATUTE-78-Pg302-2.pdf (accessed March 3, 2023). 15. U.S. Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration, “About Us,” last updated March 23, 2022, https:// www.maritime.dot.gov/about-us (accessed March 4, 2023). 16. H.R. 10378, Merchant Marine Act of 1920, Public Law 66-261, 66th Congress, June 5, 1920, https://govtrackus. s3.amazonaws.com/legislink/pdf/stat/41/STATUTE-41-Pg988.pdf (accessed March 3, 2023).

Department of Homeland Security

Weak

Vector: 58%

Pages: 177-179AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on human trafficking awareness in transportation infrastructure, while the Project 2025 policy emphasizes immigration enforcement, denaturalization, and reform of temporary work visa programs to combat forced labor trafficking. Both address human trafficking, but the bill's approach is public awareness and signage, whereas Project 2025 prioritizes enforcement, adjudication, and systemic immigration reforms."

Key themes:human traffickingforced labortemporary work visa programslaw enforcement coordination

— 144 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise prosecuting criminal and civil denaturalization cases, in combination with the Department of Justice, for aliens who obtained citizenship through fraud or other illicit means. Additionally, USCIS should create a criminal enforcement compo- nent within the agency to investigate immigration benefits fraud under Title 8 (perhaps requiring additional legislative and regulatory authorities for the offi- cers themselves) and to prosecute cases through Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys (SAUSAs) with substantive knowledge in the field. Particular attention should be given to addressing increasing incidents of forced labor trafficking in temporary work visa programs. While the Biden regulatory agenda has focused on at least two major rules—the credible fear rule and the public charge rule—USCIS has utilized other policy and internal procedural mechanisms to extend employment authorization to large groups of people who are in the country without legal status. The agency has taken quiet steps to cut corners and lessen adjudicatory standards. During a tran- sition period, a complete audit of agency policies, memoranda, and management directives issued during the Biden Administration should be completed, and rescis- sion documents should be prepared for issuance within the first few days of the incoming Administration. Additionally, regulatory documents should be drafted to review or reverse all regulations promulgated during the Biden Administration. New Policies To advance the national interest, the three core immigration agencies—USCIS, ICE, and CBP—should remerge and have immigration elements outside of DHS (such as ORR of HHS) included. The fragmented immigration enforcement frame- work that developed in the wake of the Homeland Security Act has weakened each agency and should be remediated. Combining these critical agencies would strengthen their capabilities, ensure cooperation, and promote information-shar- ing. Agency responsibilities and the delineation of authorities, such as inconsistent use of deferred action and issuance of NTAs by each agency, have long been a point of contention that would be addressed much more easily if they were recombined into a single entity. Alternatively, new policies for USCIS as it currently exists should focus on mat- ters that can be addressed through administrative action. l The workforce should be realigned and, as necessary, retrained on base eligibility and fraud detection rather than speed in processing. l Training should be returned to Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (FLETC), which would underscore the enforcement role of USCIS as a vetting agency, and be rebranded accordingly. — 145 — Department of Homeland Security l Management Directives and policies should realign to ensure that the workforce, while adaptable and able to handle the bulk of the USCIS mission, is not allowed to be pulled off mission work to focus on unlawful programs (DACA, mass parole for Afghans, Ukrainians, Venezuelans, etc.), which divert resources away from nuclear family and employment programs. The regulatory agenda should include the immediate submission of notices of proposed rulemaking for the Trump Administration’s public charge rule (includ- ing aspects from its original notice of proposed rulemaking), temporary work visa reform, employment authorization reform rules, asylum bars rule, and a third-country transit rule. At a minimum, an enhanced regulatory agenda should include rules strengthening the integrity of the asylum system, parole reform, and U visa reform that prioritizes relief for victims of heinous crimes and ensures that we protect the truest and most deserving victims of crime. Not all policy changes require formal rulemaking, however, as internal guidance documents are generally exempt under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).7 In this subregulatory space, USCIS policy memos and operational guidance should reduce the validity of employment authorization documents and end the COVID flexibilities, including the reliance on biometrics reuse. USCIS should also enforce existing regulations by rejecting incomplete applications and petitions, ensuring both that they are completed before accepted for filing and that FDNS signs off on all approved applications and petitions before approval notices are sent to the alien or petitioner. Other efforts should be focused on adjudication standards returning to nearly 100 percent interview requirements for all appropriate cases. The incoming Administration should spearhead an immigration legislative agenda focused on creating a merit-based immigration system that rewards high- skilled aliens instead of the current system that favors extended family–based and luck-of-the-draw immigration. To that end, the diversity visa lottery should be repealed, chain migration should be ended while focusing on the nuclear family, and the existing employment visa program should be replaced with a system to award visas only to the “best and brightest.” Internal efforts to limit employment authorization should be matched by con- gressional action to narrow statutory eligibility to work in the United States and mitigate unfair employment competition for U.S. citizens. The oft-abused H-1B program should be transformed into an elite program through which employers are vying to bring in only the top foreign workers at the highest wages so as not to depress American opportunities. Additionally, Congress should: l Improve the integrity of the temporary work visa programs; l Repeal Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations;

Department of Transportation

Weak

Vector: 58%

Pages: 658-660AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on human trafficking awareness in transportation infrastructure, while the Project 2025 DOT section emphasizes automated vehicles, regulatory reform, spectrum allocation, and technology neutrality—there is minimal thematic overlap between the two."

Key themes:Department of Transportationtransportation safety

— 625 — Department of Transportation security, and privacy without hampering innovation. DOT can oversee the testing and deployment of a wide variety of new technologies, allowing communities and individuals to choose what best fits their needs. It is the role of the private sector, not the government, to pick winners and losers in technology development. If a technology underperforms, the private sector should be liable, not the government. The department should ensure a tech-neutral approach to addressing any emerging transportation technology while keeping safety as the number one priority. As part of this, it should work to facilitate the safe and full integration of automated vehicles into the national transportation system. Over time, these advanced technologies can save lives, transform personal mobility, and provide additional transportation opportunities—including for people with disabili- ties, aging populations, and communities where car ownership is expensive or impractical. NHTSA’s and FMCSA’s current regulations were written before the advent of automated vehicles and driving systems. Both operating administrations have issued Advance Notices of Proposed Rulemakings (ANPRMs) that begin the pro- cess of updating their regulations to reflect this new technology. However, these regulations have stalled under the Biden Administration, which has chosen to use the department’s tools to get people to take transit and drive electric vehicles instead of helping people to choose the transportation options that suit them best. l NHTSA should work to remove regulatory barriers by focusing on updating vehicle standards as well as publishing performance-based rules for the operations of automated vehicles (AVs). l FMCSA should work to clarify the regulations to align with DOT’s AV 3.0 guidance, which would allow the drivers to be safely removed from the operations of a commercial motor vehicle. From a nonregulatory point of view, DOT has pivoted from a successful focus on the voluntary sharing of data to improve safety outcomes to adoption of a more compulsory and antagonistic approach to mandating data collection and publica- tion through a Standing General Order related to automated vehicles. This needs to be reversed. Many of these new and innovative technologies rely on wireless communica- tions that depend on the availability and purchase of radio frequency spectrum, a trend that is consistent with what we see in connectivity in our everyday lives. There is a role for DOT in ensuring that in the fight over spectrum, transportation gets its fair share. For technologies to work in transportation, and in particular to work for transportation safety, they have to meet the unique needs of a transportation

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Blackburn, Marsha

American Music Tourism Act of 2025

119/s/195

Safe Cloud Storage Act

119/s/3023

Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act

119/s/307

Back to All Bills