The bill
GUARD Act
S. 2544, 119th Congress β read as touching Crypto & Fintech.
Sponsored by
Sen. Britt, Katie Boyd [R-AL]
ID: B001319
Follow the money
The bill
S. 2544, 119th Congress β read as touching Crypto & Fintech.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
26 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 317.
February 8, 2026
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
(sigh) Oh joy, another bill that's going to "protect" the vulnerable and "fight" crime. How original.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The GUARD Act (S 2544) is a congressional attempt to sound like they care about elder financial fraud, pig butchering, and general financial scams. The main purpose is to permit state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies to use federal grant funds for investigating these crimes. Because, you know, that's not already being done.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill defines various terms like "elder financial fraud" (because we didn't know what that meant before) and "pig butchering" (no, it's not about actual pigs). It also clarifies that federal law enforcement agencies can assist state, local, and tribal agencies in using tracing tools for blockchain technology. Wow, how cutting-edge.
The bill allows grant recipients to use funds for hiring personnel, training, software, and technical tools related to financial fraud investigations. Because what we really need is more bureaucracy and paperwork.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** State, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies will be affected by this bill, as well as federal agencies that provide grants. Financial institutions might also be impacted, but only if they're willing to share information with law enforcement (good luck with that).
Oh, and let's not forget the real stakeholders: the lobbyists who pushed for this bill and the politicians who get to claim they "did something" about financial scams.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will likely have a negligible impact on actual crime rates or protecting vulnerable populations. It's just another example of legislative theater, designed to make politicians look good while doing nothing meaningful.
The real implications are that this bill will:
1. Increase bureaucratic red tape and paperwork for law enforcement agencies. 2. Provide more opportunities for grant recipients to waste taxpayer money on "training" and "software." 3. Give politicians a talking point to claim they're "tough on crime."
In short, the GUARD Act is a classic case of legislative placebo: it makes you feel like something's being done, but in reality, it's just a sugar pill.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than analyze this drivel. Next!
Sen. Britt, Katie Boyd [R-AL]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: G000555
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001217
Top Contributors
10
ID: L000575
Top Contributors
10
ID: W000790
Top Contributors
10
ID: C001088
Top Contributors
10
ID: K000367
Top Contributors
10
ID: M001244
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
ID: G000386
Top Contributors
10
ID: C001098
Top Contributors
10
ID: K000383
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 67 nodes and 41 connections (66 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $210,745
Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
Section 3(a)(2)(C) and (D) authorize use of eligible federal grant funds for training on blockchain intelligence tools and emerging technologies, and Section 7 clarifies federal law enforcement may assist in use of tracing tools for blockchain and related technology, which benefits crypto/fintech firms by increasing demand for blockchain analysis tools and services.
Section 5(b) requires solicitation of public comment from telecommunications companies when preparing the report on scams, indicating engagement with the industry and potential influence on regulatory approaches, which could be seen as a benefit through increased involvement in policy discussions.
Section 5(b) requires solicitation of public comment from social media companies and email providers when preparing the report on scams, indicating engagement with big tech platforms and potential influence on their policies regarding scam prevention, which could be seen as a benefit through collaborative efforts.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Britt, Katie Boyd [R-AL])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.