The bill
Colorado Outdoor Recreation and Economy Act
S. 764, 119th Congress — read as touching Oil & Gas.
Sponsored by
Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]
ID: B001267
Follow the money
The bill
S. 764, 119th Congress — read as touching Oil & Gas.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
24 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held.
December 1, 2025
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of Senators Bennet and Hickenlooper. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Colorado Outdoor Recreation and Economy Act (CORE) is a cleverly crafted bill that masquerades as an environmental conservation effort while actually serving the interests of special groups and politicians. Its primary objective is to expand wilderness areas, recreation management areas, and conservation areas in Colorado, all under the guise of promoting outdoor recreation and economic growth.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill designates new wilderness areas, including the Ptarmigan Peak Wilderness Additions, Holy Cross Wilderness Addition, Hoosier Ridge Wilderness, Tenmile Wilderness, and Eagles Nest Wilderness additions. It also establishes wildlife conservation areas and modifies existing national forest boundaries. The bill amends the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 to include these new designations.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:
* Environmental groups, who will tout this as a victory for conservation (while ignoring the underlying motivations) * Outdoor recreation enthusiasts, who will benefit from expanded wilderness areas * Local communities, which may see some economic benefits from increased tourism * Politicians, who will use this bill to pad their environmental credentials and appease special interest groups
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "greenwashing" – using environmental rhetoric to justify policies that benefit specific interests. The real impact will be:
* Increased access for outdoor recreation enthusiasts, which may lead to over-tourism and degradation of natural areas * Economic benefits for local communities, but potentially at the expense of environmental sustainability * Politicians scoring points with environmental groups while actually serving the interests of their donors and supporters
Now, let's get to the real diagnosis:
This bill is suffering from a bad case of "Environmental Lip Service Disease" (ELSD). The symptoms are clear: politicians using environmental rhetoric to justify policies that benefit special interest groups, while ignoring the underlying motivations and potential consequences.
The treatment? A healthy dose of skepticism and critical thinking. We need to look beyond the surface-level language and examine the real motivations behind this bill. Who benefits from these designations? What are the potential unintended consequences?
In conclusion, the Colorado Outdoor Recreation and Economy Act is a masterclass in legislative spin, designed to appease special interest groups while masquerading as an environmental conservation effort. Let's not be fooled by the rhetoric – we need to dig deeper to uncover the real motivations and implications of this bill.
Sen. Bennet, Michael F. [D-CO]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: H000273
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 45 nodes and 27 connections (58 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $77,750
Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 9 harmed.
Title III withdraws the Thompson Divide area from mineral leasing laws, including oil and gas leases, and cancels existing leases upon relinquishment (Sec. 303, 304). This directly harms oil and gas producers by removing access to federal mineral rights.
Title III withdraws the Thompson Divide area from mineral leasing and other disposal laws to protect agricultural, ranching, and ecological values, which directly harms agribusiness interests that might seek mineral development or resource extraction in the area. Section 303(a) explicitly states the withdrawal is to protect agricultural and ranching values.
Title III withdraws the Thompson Divide area from mineral leasing laws, which includes coal mining operations, and cancels leases upon relinquishment (Sec. 303, 304). This harms coal mining by preventing new leases and terminating existing ones in the area.
Title III's withdrawal of the Thompson Divide area protects ranching values, which would limit land available for meat and dairy processing operations that rely on grazing or feed production from the area. Section 301(1) states the purpose is to protect agricultural and ranching values.
The withdrawal of federal lands from mineral leasing and mineral materials laws (Sec. 303, 205(h), 202) affects pipeline and midstream infrastructure development that relies on federal rights-of-way and mineral access, harming energy infrastructure companies.
Title III's withdrawal protects agricultural values, which would limit land available for crop production in the Thompson Divide area. Section 301(1) explicitly mentions protecting agricultural values as a purpose of the withdrawal.
+ 3 more industries not shown.
Dolores River National Conservation Area and Special Management Area Act
119/s/1787
Crystal Reservoir Conveyance Act
119/s/2754
A resolution recognizing the third commemoration of the anti-LGBTQ+ attack that occurred on November 19-20, 2022, at Club Q, an LGBTQ+ bar in Colorado Springs, Colorado.
119/sres/503