The bill
Transportation Security Administration Pay Act of 2026
S. 4127, 119th Congress — read as touching Airlines.
Sponsored by
Sen. Rosen, Jacky [D-NV]
ID: R000608
Follow the money
The bill
S. 4127, 119th Congress — read as touching Airlines.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
The alignment
This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 652-654 of the Mandate for Leadership.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 362.
March 17, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
The Transportation Security Administration Pay Act of 2026 is a bill that screams "desperation" and " CYA" (Cover Your Anatomy). It's a stopgap measure to fund TSA personnel during a lapse in appropriations, because, you know, Congress couldn't be bothered to pass a real budget on time.
Total funding amounts? Oh boy, it's a whopping... unspecified amount! That's right; the bill doesn't bother to mention how much money is actually being allocated. I guess that's what happens when you're too busy patting yourself on the back for "supporting our brave TSA agents" to worry about pesky details like budget numbers.
Key programs and agencies receiving funds? Well, it's all about the TSA, baby! Because, clearly, the most pressing issue facing America is ensuring that airport security personnel get paid. I mean, who needs roads, education, or healthcare when you can have a fully funded TSA?
Notable increases or decreases from previous years? Ha! Don't make me laugh. This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It's a temporary fix to avoid a government shutdown, not a serious attempt at fiscal responsibility.
Riders or policy provisions attached to funding? Oh, you bet your sweet bippy there are! Section 2(c) of the bill allows for "charge[s] to future appropriations," which is just a fancy way of saying "we'll worry about paying for it later." It's like putting a credit card charge on your great-grandchildren's tab.
Fiscal impact and deficit implications? *Cue maniacal laughter* This bill is a fiscal time bomb waiting to go off. By not specifying funding amounts, Congress is essentially giving itself a blank check to spend whatever it wants, whenever it wants. And with the "charge to future appropriations" provision, they're ensuring that the bill's true costs will be hidden from public scrutiny.
In short, this bill is a masterclass in legislative malpractice. It's a cynical attempt to paper over the cracks of a broken budget process while pretending to care about TSA personnel. Newsflash: Congress doesn't care about anyone except themselves and their donors.
Diagnosis? Terminal case of Congressional Stupidity Syndrome (CSS), with symptoms including:
* Inability to pass a real budget * Addiction to stopgap measures * Willingness to ignore fiscal responsibility * Tendency to prioritize self-interest over public good
Prognosis? Grim. This bill will likely become law, and the American people will be left to foot the bill for Congress's incompetence.
Sen. Rosen, Jacky [D-NV]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: C000127
Top Contributors
10
ID: W000790
Top Contributors
10
ID: L000570
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
ID: P000145
Top Contributors
10
ID: R000122
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001267
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001181
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001277
Top Contributors
10
ID: D000563
Top Contributors
10
ID: P000595
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 68 nodes and 42 connections (76 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $167,210
Showing top 17 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.
Section 2 provides continuing appropriations for essential Transportation Security Administration pay and operations, which would help ensure the continuity of airport security screening and thus support the operations of airlines, citing the need for standard rates of pay and benefits for TSA employees during the lapse in appropriations.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Rosen, Jacky [D-NV])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.
— 619 — 19 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Diana Furchtgott-Roth INTRODUCTION America needs transportation that is more abundant and affordable as well as dignified, accessible, and family friendly. Transportation plays a vital role in the prosperity and flourishing of the United States. Americans use trucks, tankers, and trains to keep our supply chains running and cars, transit, and planes to go where we want to go. Two hundred and forty years ago, Adam Smith recognized that connections were a bedrock of society because they stimulate specialization, innovation, and capital investment. In the following decades, America’s growth was made possible by transportation—first ports and transatlantic shipping, then roads, canals, and eventually railroads pushing westward to create the nation we call home. Access to transportation is part of what made our country great. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), with a requested fiscal year (FY) 2023 budget of $142 billion,1 was originally intended simply to provide a policy framework for transportation safety, rulemaking, and regulation. However, it has evolved to believe that its role is “to deliver the world’s leading transportation system”2—that is, to select individual projects and allocate taxpayer funds in the actual planning, developing, and building of transportation assets. Such a role is held more appropriately by transportation asset owners: primarily states, munic- ipalities, and the private sector. In addition to providing a safety and regulatory framework through its 11 sub- components, known as modes, the department has become a de facto grantmaking and lending organization. DOT provides approximately $50 billion in discretionary
— 619 — 19 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Diana Furchtgott-Roth INTRODUCTION America needs transportation that is more abundant and affordable as well as dignified, accessible, and family friendly. Transportation plays a vital role in the prosperity and flourishing of the United States. Americans use trucks, tankers, and trains to keep our supply chains running and cars, transit, and planes to go where we want to go. Two hundred and forty years ago, Adam Smith recognized that connections were a bedrock of society because they stimulate specialization, innovation, and capital investment. In the following decades, America’s growth was made possible by transportation—first ports and transatlantic shipping, then roads, canals, and eventually railroads pushing westward to create the nation we call home. Access to transportation is part of what made our country great. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), with a requested fiscal year (FY) 2023 budget of $142 billion,1 was originally intended simply to provide a policy framework for transportation safety, rulemaking, and regulation. However, it has evolved to believe that its role is “to deliver the world’s leading transportation system”2—that is, to select individual projects and allocate taxpayer funds in the actual planning, developing, and building of transportation assets. Such a role is held more appropriately by transportation asset owners: primarily states, munic- ipalities, and the private sector. In addition to providing a safety and regulatory framework through its 11 sub- components, known as modes, the department has become a de facto grantmaking and lending organization. DOT provides approximately $50 billion in discretionary — 620 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise and formula grants, known as obligations, annually in areas ranging from transit systems to road construction to universities and has lent or subsidized more than $60 billion since the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) program,3 now managed by the Build America Bureau, was created in 1998. This evolved role as a major, and often primary, funding and financing source is far from the department’s original policy framework. It also removes incentives for state and local officials to ensure that investments are worthwhile, because federal money removes the need to get public buy-in to build and maintain infrastructure projects as funding becomes “someone else’s money.” Despite the department’s tremendous resources, congressional mandates and funding priorities have made it difficult for DOT to focus on the pressing trans- portation challenges that most directly affect average Americans, such as the high cost of personal automobiles, especially in an era of high inflation; unpredictable and expensive commercial shipping by rail, air, and sea; and infrastructure spend- ing that does not match the types of transportation that most Americans prefer. Transforming the department to address the varied needs of all Americans more effectively remains a central challenge. DOT is particularly difficult to manage because its 11 major components—nine modal administrations, the Office of the Secretary, and the Office of the Inspector General—all have their own sets of personnel including administrators, deputy administrators, chiefs of staff, and general counsels. Most grants flow through the modes, such as the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administra- tion, and Federal Aviation Administration. The Office of the Secretary contains its own grantmaking operation that funds research and some special grants, as well as a major lending operation, the Build America Bureau, that functions as an infrastructure bank. The Office of the Sec- retary has department-wide offices for such functions as Budget and Financial Management, the General Counsel, Policy, the Office of Research and Technology, Government Affairs, Administration, the Office of the Chief Information Officer, Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, Public Affairs, Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance, and Civil Rights. The modal administrations include the: l Federal Aviation Administration (FAA); l Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); l Federal Railroad Administration (FRA); l National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA); l Federal Transit Administration (FTA);
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel of certain defense articles and services.
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.
HELP Response and Recovery Act