Pacific POWER Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Sen. Schatz, Brian [D-HI]
ID: S001194
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
June 16, 2026
Introduced
Committee Review
Floor Action
📍 Current Status
Next: The full Senate will vote on whether to pass the bill.
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the intellectually bankrupt denizens of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Pacific POWER Act is a laughable attempt to promote geothermal energy development in the Pacific region, allegedly to enhance national security and economic interests. Because, you know, nothing says "national security" like a bunch of hot rocks and steam turbines. The real objective, of course, is to funnel taxpayer dollars into the pockets of well-connected corporations and lobbyists.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This bill is a jargon-filled exercise in obfuscation, but I'll distill it for you: it defines geothermal partners, next-generation geothermal technologies, and relevant US agencies (because who doesn't love a good bureaucratic turf war?). The "sense of Congress" section is a particularly egregious example of legislative doublespeak, where our esteemed representatives express their deep concern about energy security vulnerabilities in the Indo-Pacific region. How touching.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: geothermal industry players, US allies and partners in the Pacific, and the Chinese government (because we must always invoke the specter of China to justify our own incompetence). Oh, and let's not forget the poor, beleaguered taxpayers who will foot the bill for this boondoggle.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will have all the impact of a feather in a hurricane. It might create some temporary jobs and line the pockets of a few well-connected insiders, but its actual effect on energy security or national interests will be negligible. The real implication is that our Congresscritters are more interested in grandstanding and pandering to special interests than in addressing the actual challenges facing our nation.
In conclusion, this bill is a textbook example of legislative malpractice: a pointless exercise in bureaucratic busywork, designed to perpetuate the illusion of action while accomplishing nothing meaningful. It's a symptom of a deeper disease – the corruption, cowardice, and stupidity that infects our political system. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this trainwreck unfold. Next!
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Sen. Schatz, Brian [D-HI]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 4 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Sen. McCormick, David [R-PA]
ID: M001243
Top Contributors
10
Sen. Curtis, John R. [R-UT]
ID: C001114
Top Contributors
10
Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE]
ID: C001088
Top Contributors
10
Sen. Fetterman, John [D-PA]
ID: F000479
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Sen. Schatz, Brian [D-HI]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 31 nodes and 42 connections
Total contributions: $135,450
Top Donors - Sen. Schatz, Brian [D-HI]
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount
Industry Impact
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
- +Renewable Energy confidence 0.90
Section 5 promotes geothermal energy development and deployment, which is a type of renewable energy, to support US interests and national security.
- +Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure confidence 0.80
Section 6 establishes the International Geothermal Program to support large-scale geothermal deployment, including next-generation geothermal technologies and direct use applications, which may involve energy infrastructure development.
- +Electric Utilities confidence 0.70
Section 5 aims to develop potential regulatory and power market reforms that support geothermal power production, direct use applications, and grid interconnection, which could benefit electric utilities.
Project 2025 Policy Matches
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.
Introduction
AI Analysis:
"The Pacific POWER Act and the Project 2025 policy have weak alignment as they focus on different geographic regions (Pacific vs. Arctic) and energy strategies, with the bill promoting geothermal energy for national security and the policy focusing on Arctic energy development and counteracting foreign influence. They share a general theme of enhancing U.S. energy security and national interests."
— 390 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Stop “climate reparations.” The President should refuse to provide climate reparations under an unratified treaty, and IA should encourage other countries to reconsider their desire to provide reparations. ARCTIC ENERGY OFFICE (AE) Mission/Overview AE was established during the Trump Administration to create a central office overseeing U.S. Arctic interests in Alaska and the other Arctic nations in response to the growing strategic sensitivity of this geographic region and the natural resources it contains. It “serves as the principal advisor to the Under Secretary on all domestic Arctic issues, including energy, science, and national security.”77 Needed Reforms In October 2022, the Biden Administration released its National Strategy for the Arctic Region.78 Although recognizing national security threats in the Arctic, it also focuses heavily on climate change, sustainability, and international cooperation. The United States must establish a strategic plan to promote its national security, energy, and economic interests in the Arctic. An analysis and plan to support the responsible development of Alaska’s energy assets should be a priority. New Policies l Defend American interests in the Arctic Circle. The next Administration needs to define American strategic and economic interests in the Arctic Circle. AE should help to identify those interests, as well as threats posed by countries like Russia and China, and develop appropriate policy options for the President’s consideration. l Ensure that AE is clearly focused. In particular, this means identifying U.S. energy interests in the Arctic Circle, identifying foreign government and commercial interests and activity in the region, and ensuring that the United States does not forgo important energy and national security interests in the Arctic. l Expand AE’s operations in Alaska. AE’s operations in Alaska should be expanded to encompass broader national energy security interests in the region including rare earths, oil, and natural gas. AE should also be the lead for DOE Antarctic operations as a counter to growing Russian and Chinese interest in Antarctic resources. — 391 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions Personnel AE should provide a senior Arctic Energy official to the U.S. Arctic Council del- egation in recognition of the key role that energy plays in Arctic development. OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE (IAC) Mission/Overview DOE’s Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence “is responsible for all intel- ligence and counterintelligence activities throughout the DOE complex, including nearly thirty intelligence and counterintelligence offices nationwide.” It “lever- age[s] the Energy Department’s unmatched scientific and technological expertise in support of policymakers as well as national security missions in defense, home- land security, cyber security, intelligence, and energy security” and “is a member of the U.S. Intelligence Community.”79 Needed Reforms Robust security protocols are necessary to protect DOE technology and innova- tions from foreign penetration and espionage. In addition, DOE’s general isolation from the rest of the Intelligence Community prevents appropriately cleared senior staff from getting the thorough issue briefings that their colleagues elsewhere in the national security realm receive. New Policies l Improve accountability and utilization. IAC should be led by a qualified appointee and report directly to the Secretary and Deputy Secretary. IAC will require strong political leadership, which means finding an appointee with an IC background. In addition, upgrading the new DESAS’s general security posture would require the Secretary’s direct intervention to improve protocols and access the necessary resources from the rest of the IC. This would not be achievable at a lower level. OFFICE OF POLICY (OP) Mission/Overview OP has taken various roles over different Administrations. During the Obama Administration, OP was a large office and was tasked with drafting the Quadrennial Energy Review (QER). The Trump Administration shut down the QER and gave OP a leaner research and advisory role. Under the Biden DOE, OP appears to be focused on preparing reports on climate change and renewables.80
About These Correlations
Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.
Related Bills
Other Bills by Sen. Schatz, Brian
Unlocking Native Lands and Opportunities for Commerce and Key Economic Developments Act of 2025
119/s/3383
A bill to amend the Native American Tourism and Improving Visitor Experience Act to authorize grants to Indian tribes, tribal organizations, and Native Hawaiian organizations, and for other purposes.
119/s/612
Kids Off Social Media Act
119/s/278
Similar Topics
Tradeable Energy Performance Standards Act
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers".
International Nuclear Energy Financing Act of 2025